Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Dec 8;17(12):e98717. doi: 10.7759/cureus.98717

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Hypophysitis and Pituitary Dysfunction: A Systematic Review of Diagnosis and Management

Pooja SirDeshpande 1,, Soorya Bavikeri Shivakumara Hegde 2, Hassan Akhtar 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC12777828  PMID: 41510421

Abstract

With an objective to review the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi)-associated hypophysitis and pituitary dysfunction, we conducted a systematic review of 84 studies (2005-2025) involving 7,259 patients evaluated pituitary immune-related adverse events (irAEs) linked to CTLA-4 inhibitors, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, and combination therapies. Data included ICPi type, demographics, cancer type, treatment duration, imaging, pituitary dysfunction, symptoms and management.

Following statistical analysis, the weighted mean of male patients was 68.3%, with a pooled mean age of 63.9 years. Common symptoms included fatigue, headache, hyponatraemia, nausea, anorexia, and neuropsychiatric changes. While MRI is a key diagnostic tool, it may not always detect subtle or early-stage pituitary involvement.

In the CTLA-4 group, patients received ipilimumab for 2-12 cycles (mean: 3.3) before hypophysitis onset. In the PD-1/PD-L1 group, median time to onset was 28 weeks (range: 10-46 weeks). Hypophysitis induced by CTLA-4 inhibitors, particularly ipilimumab and CTLA-4-based combination therapies, were more commonly associated with hypopituitarism. In contrast, isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency, often linked to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, presents as secondary adrenal insufficiency without distinct MRI abnormalities.

Reported MRI abnormalities included hypophysitis, pituitary stalk abnormalities, pituitary enlargement, microadenoma, pituitary atrophy, and empty sella. The most common biochemical abnormalities in the combination group were hypopituitarism and secondary adrenal insufficiency. High-dose glucocorticoid initiation, careful tapering, and tailored long-term hormone replacement remained the mainstays of management.

In conclusion, our systematic review highlights hypopituitarism as a frequent and often persistent consequence of ICPi-associated hypophysitis. Early recognition through combined clinical, biochemical, and radiological assessment is essential to reduce long-term endocrine morbidity and optimise patient outcomes.

Keywords: atezolizumab, cemiplimab, ctla-4 inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitor, ipilimumab, nivolumab, pd-1 inhibitors, pd-l1 inhibitors, pembrolizumab, tremelimumab

Introduction and background

Discovered in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) have revolutionised cancer treatment in recent years. Immune checkpoints are small molecules on the surface of immune cells involved in maintaining immune homeostasis [1]. ICPis are the monoclonal antibodies that work by targeting immune checkpoints such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PDL-1), thereby enhancing T-cell activation and promoting a robust antitumor immune response. Their introduction has ushered in a new era of immuno-oncology with durable responses across a range of malignancies [2]. ICPi therapy can also trigger autoimmune adverse effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Endocrinopathies are among the most common irAEs associated with ICPi therapy and include hypophysitis, thyroid dysfunction (thyroiditis, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor hypothyroidism, or Grave’s disease), insulin-deficient diabetes mellitus (DM), adrenal insufficiency (AI), hypoparathyroidism and rarely AVP deficiency, prolactin deficiency or hyperprolactinemia [3]. Hypophysitis, or inflammation of the pituitary gland, is one of the most common ICPi-related endocrinopathies and is mainly associated with anti-CTLA-4 therapy, but can also be encountered with PD1 and PDL-1 or combination therapies. With the growing use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy in oncology and the potentially life-threatening consequences of untreated endocrinopathies, it is essential that clinical practitioners are well-informed about the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of ICPi-induced endocrine disorders [4,5]. The aim of our study was to perform a systematic review of ICPi-associated pituitary dysfunction, including its clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management.

Review

This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines (Figure 1). Literature search was carried out using the advanced search option in PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid, Medline and Embase from 2005 to 2025. Original articles that have published results were identified by a literature search and by examining the references of published articles by two authors (PS and SH). The following keywords or corresponding Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were used: “Immune checkpoint inhibitor,” “CTLA-4,” “Ipilimumab,” “Tremelimumab,” “PD-1,” “Nivolumab,” “Pembrolizumab,” “Cemiplimab,” “PD-L1,” “Atezolizumab,” “Durvalumab,” “Avelumab,” “Hypophysitis,” “Hypopituitarism,” “Pituitary dysfunction.”

Figure 1. Summary of literature search and selection.

Figure 1

The search focused on original studies investigating pituitary dysfunction induced by ICPi monotherapy or combination therapy. Our inclusion criteria encompassed all prospective or retrospective single- or multicentre randomised case-control studies, cohort studies, observational audits or quality improvement studies, case series with literature reviews, and meta-analyses. Only articles published in English with available results were included. We excluded single case reports, abstracts without full-text published articles, expert opinions, editorials, and narrative reviews.

Individual case reports were included for the PD-L1 inhibitor category due to the limited availability of higher-quality evidence within this class. These reports were presented separately in the review and were not included in the statistical analysis. In cases of duplicate publications, ambiguity, or multiple reports on the same study population, only the most recent, relevant, or comprehensive publication was included in the analysis. Any discrepancies in study selection were resolved by consensus.

A total of 907 articles were identified through the literature search, of which 117 met the eligibility criteria. Ultimately, 84 articles were included in the final review (Figure 1).

Data were extracted under the following headings: type of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi), name of the drug, dose of ICPi, duration or number of cycles administered, total number of patients, number of patients analysed, sex distribution (number of males/females), type of cancer, imaging modality used, imaging results, type of pituitary dysfunction or immune-related adverse events (irAEs), clinical symptoms, and treatment administered (Tables 1-3) Individual case reports within the PD-L1 category were excluded from the final statistical analysis and instead summarised in a separate table (Table 4).

Table 1. Literature included and analysed for CTLA-4 monotherapy category.

Literature included and analysed for the CTLA-4 monotherapy category

HRT: hormone replacement therapy; IIH: idiopathic intracranial hypertension; ICPi: immune checkpoint inhibitor; NR: not reported

Author (Year of Publication) Type of ICPi Name of the Drug Dose of ICPi Duration of ICPi Total Number of Analysed Patients Age (Years) Gender Type of Cancer Results of Imaging Type of Pituitary Dysfunction Symptomatology Treatment Given
Blansfield et al. (2005) [6] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3-9 mg/kg 5-9 doses 8 31-61 100% Male Melanoma, RCC IIH - 8/163 (4.5%) Hypopituitarism Fatigue, headache, diarrhoea, insomnia, constipation Intravenous dexamethasone (4 mg every 6 hours) for 7 days and then tapered to maintenance doses of hydrocortisone with HRT
Yang et al. (2007) [7] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg stat f/b 1 mg/kg in cohort A 3 mg/kg in cohort B Every 3 weeks - total of 4 doses 61 31-70 45/61 (73.7%) Male RCC IIH - 2/61 (3.27%) Hypopituitarism Diarrhoea, rash, arthritis Systemic dexamethasone and steroid enemas for enteritis, Hydrocortisone for hypophysitis
Dillard et al. (2010) [8] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg in case 1. No mention of case 2 4 doses in case 1. No mention in case 2 2 50, 67 Both males Prostate cancer IIH Hypopituitarism Headache with eye pain, asthenia, anorexia, labile moods, insomnia, fever and chills Case 1 - Prednisone 60 mg daily and tapered to 10 mg/day. Case 2 - Prednisone 120 mg/day
Lammert et al. (2013) [9] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in 6 and 10 mg/kg in 1 patient 1-4 cycles 7 31-77 6/7 (85.71%) Male Melanoma and prostate cancer IIH Hypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, dizziness Corticosteroids + HRT
Chodakiewitz et al. (2014) [10] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg 4 cycles 3 45-65 3 females Melanoma Hypophysitis in all 3 patients Hypopituitarism Headache, fatigue Glucocorticoid and HRT
Iwama et al. (2014) [11] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in 4 patients, 10 mg/kg in 16 patients 3 - 12 cycles 20 34-78 15/20 (75%) Male Melanoma, prostate cancer Hypophysitis in 4/20 (20%) patients Hypopituitarism Fatigue, headache, vision changes and weakness NR
Faje et al. (2014) [12] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (13 patients) 10 mg/kg (4 patients) Every 3 weeks - total of 4 doses 17 68.2 +/- 2.4 15/17 (88.2%) Male Melanoma IIH in 17/154 (11%) Hypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, nausea, reduced appetite, cold intolerance, hot flashes, dizziness, confusion, blurry vision High-dose glucocorticoids (prednisone 60 mg daily) followed by physiological replacement dose
Araujo et al. (2015) [13] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in 49.1% and >3 mg/kg in 50.9% >3 vs<3 71 Median 60 (31-82) 56/71 (78.87%) Male Melanoma Hypophysitis in 44/57 (77.1 %) Hypopituitarism Fatigue, headache, arthritis, low libido Glucocorticoids in 46/54 (85.2 %) and HRT in 62/66 (93.9 %)
Lam et al. (2015) [14] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg × 3 doses in nine 10 mg/kg × 4 doses in one 4 cycles in 8 patients, 2 cycles in 2 patients 10 46-70 9/10 (90%) Male Melanoma Hypophysitis in 5 patients (50%) Hypopituitarism Fatigue, nausea, weakness, hyponatraemia High-dose glucocorticoids - 6 patients with visual compromise (Physiological doses in 4 patients)
Albarel et al. (2015) [15] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3-10 mg/kg 2-4 cycles 15 55.5+/-11.2 10/15 (66%) Male Melanoma Hypophysitis in 15 patients (11.45%) Hypopituitarism Headache, asthenia, weakness, dizziness, reduced libido Glucocorticoid therapy
Le Min et al. (2015) [16] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in 17 patients, 10 mg/kg in 25 patients Every 3 weeks - total of 4 doses 25 NR 19/25 (76%) Male Melanoma IIH 16.1% (19/118) in males, 8.7% (6/69) in females, NET - 13.3% (25/187) Hypopituitarism Headache and fatigue High-dose glucocorticoid (30 mg hydrocortisone) in 15 patients
Faje (2016) [17] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 or 10 mg/kg NR 57 Mean 68.2 44/57 (77.19%) Male Melanoma IIH - in 44 patients Hypopituitarism Headache and fatigue Physiologic or moderately supraphysiologic doses of glucocorticoids
Mahzari et al. (2015) [18] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in 5 patients, 10 mg/kg in 1 patient NR 6 54-80 years 4 males and 2 females Melanoma IIH Hypopituitarism Headache High-dose prednisone in case 1
Brilli et al. (2017) [19] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg Every 3 weeks for a total of four doses 273 64.13 ± 9.6 years 165/273 (60.44%) male Melanoma, prostate cancer Hypophysitis in 9/273 patients (3.3%) Hypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, general discomfort Physiological replacement therapy (cortisone acetate 37.5 mg/day)
De Sousa et al. (2018) [20] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Every 3 weeks - total of 4 doses 46 63+/-4.2 6/9 Male (66%) Melanoma IIH - 9/46 (19.56%) Hypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, anorexia, light-headedness, low mood, weight loss Supraphysiological glucocorticoid therapy in 7 patients and replacement doses in 2 patients
Faje et al. (2018) [21] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab 1, 3 or 10 mg/kg No. of treatment cycles at time of diagnosis 3.3 +/- 0.1 Total no. of treatment cycles 4.4+/-0.5 98 63.4 +/- 1.3 67/98 (68.36%) Male melanoma IIH Hypopituitarism Headache, Fatigue, nausea/appetite loss, dizziness, altered mental status, myalgias/arthralgias Median glucocorticoid doses were 5.5 mg (IR - interquartile range, 3.75-7.5 mg) and 22.4 mg (IR, 11.0-35.7 mg) in the low-dose and high-dose groups
Snyders et al. (2019) [22] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab (13/15) had 3 mg/kg (2/15) had 10 mg/kg 3.0 cycles (95% CI 2.6 to 3.4) vs. 3.5 cycles (95% CI 3.3 to 3.7), P=0.087 15 Median of 62.1 yrs 10/15 (66.7%) Male Melanoma 15/117 (12.8%) developed IIH Hypopituitarism headaches, fatigue, hyponatraemia, blurry vision, weakness, and decreased libido High-dose corticosteroids were administered to 12 of the patients (≥40 mg prednisone daily). Low-dose corticosteroids in 3 patients (<80 mg prednisone daily)
Atkins and Ur (2020) [23] CTLA-4 Ipilimumab NR NR 2 59 and 69 years 1 male, 1 female 1 RCC and 1 melanoma Normal in one and enlarged stalk with loss of bright spot in the other Adrenal insufficiency Panhypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, loss of libido, erectile dysfunction, diplopia, nausea, hypotension 69/F: Only HRT 59/F: discontinuation + supraphysiological doses of steroids + HRT

Table 3. Literature included and analysed for combination therapy category.

Literature included and analysed for the combination therapy category

NR: not reported; AML: acute myeloid leukaemia; HPA: hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal

Author Type of ICPi Name of the drug Dose of ICPi Duration of ICPi Total analysed patients Age (years) Gender Type of cancer Results of imaging Type of Pituitary dysfunction Symptomatology Treatment given
Miller et al (2016) [34] CTLA-4, CTLA-4+PD-1 Ipilimumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR 3-4 doses 5 52-72 3/5 (60%) male Melanoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma and RCC IIH Hypopituitarism severe fatigue, confusion, hypotension, headache, hyponatremia Stress-dose glucocorticoids (eg, hydrocortisone 100 mg)
Caturegli et al (2016) [35] CTLA4, CTLA4+PD1 Tremelimumab, Ipilimumab + Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab + Nivolumab Tremelimumab 10mg/kg every 4 weeks, Ipilimumab 3mg/kg every 3 weeks No mention for the rest Case 3: 3 doses of Tremelimumab, 1 dose of Ipilimumab Case 4- 4 doses of ipilimumab Case 5 - 4 doses 6 79, 30,59, 65,67,58 2/5(40%) Males Pleural mesothelioma, melanoma for combi therapy IIH Hypopituitarism Diarrhoea, profound fatigue and vomiting Glucocorticoids (hydrocortisone, 100 mg four times per day; and methylprednisolone, 250 mg/day)
Ariyasu et al (2017) [36] PD1, PD1+CTLA4 NR NR NR 5 Mean age of 65.4 years (range=58-72 years) All 5 male NSCLC and SCLC Hypophysitis (in 1/5) Hypopituitarism (isolated ACTH deficiency) Fatigue and anorexia NR
Malikova et al (2018) [37] CTLA-4, PD-1 Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab Ipilimumab 3 or 10mg/kg Pembrolizumab 200mg/dose Ipilimumab: 4 cycles in patient 1 NR in the rest 28 58±13 years 9/28 (32.1%) Male Melanoma Swollen, enlarged or normal pituitary Hypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, fever, malaise, photophobia, anorexia Corticosteroid therapy at immunosuppression dose
Di Dalmazi et al (2019) [38] CTLA4, PD1, PDL-1 Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab, Atezolizumab Avelumab, Durvalumab NR NR 273 Older ages (61 ± 11.7) 199/273(72%) male Skin, Lung, Genitourinary IIH (MRI normal in 36% patients) Hypopituitarism Headache, visual changes and hormonal disturbances High-dose glucocorticoids to be considered to patients with compressive symptoms
Guerrero et al (2019) [39] CTLA-4, CTLA-4+PD-1, PD-1 Ipilimumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Nivolumab NR 3 doses (median 3, range 1-69) 689 63(20-88) 409/633 (64.6%) Male Melanoma, lung and renal IIH Hypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, visual defects High dose steroids may be considered for patients with compressive symptoms + HRT
Garon-Czmil et al (2019) [40] CTLA-4, PD-1, CTLA-4+PD-1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab Ipilimumab: 235(15-330)mg per course Nivolumab: 242(123-354)mg per course Pembrolizumab: 136(88-190)mg per course Ipilimumab+Nivolumab: 74(60-90) +229(190-260)mg per course Ipilimumab: 4(1-7) courses, Nivolumab: 10(1-33) courses Pembrolizumab: 7(1-19) courses Ipilimumab+Nivolumab: 3(2-4) courses 94 64·5 years (+/−14·1) 45/94 (47.87%) Male Melanoma, RCC, Colon, Pleural, NSCLC, SCLC IIH - Empty Sella turcica or normal pituitary imaging Hypopituitarism Fatigue and cephalalgia Hydrocortisone supplementation and HRT
Mekki et al (2019) [41] CTLA-4+PD-1, CTLA-4 Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Ipilimumab NR NR 82 56.9 +/- 12 years, with range of 23-87 years 66 (55.5%) males Melanoma, NSCLC, RCC, Oesophageal, Breast, Thyroid Rectal, NET IIH Hypopituitarism Headaches NR
Zhong Wei et al (2019) [42] CTLA-4, PD-1 Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab 3mg/kg in 5 patients 2mg/kg in 1 patient 3,3,4,2,3,35 cycles in the 6 patients 6 67 ± 14.3 38/51 (74.5%) Male Melanoma IIH (MRI normal in 3) Hypopituitarism Headache, nausea, Syncope, tiredness, vomiting, tiredness, rash Dexamethasone (8-16 mg) in 4 patients. Not given in the other 2
Leiter et al (2020) [43] CTLA-4, PD-1 Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab Case 1: Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg Case 2: pembrolizumab 200 mg/dose case 1: 8 weeks case 2: 4 cycles 2 75 1/2 (50%) male urothelial cancer case 1: Enhancing pituitary nodule case 2: NR Hypopituitarism fatigue and headaches. Prednisolone
Siddiqui et al (2020) [44] CTLA4 +PD1 Ipilimumab + Nivolumab 3mg/kg 3 cycles (3-4) in 25 patients with hypophysitis 25 Median 65 (32-79) 12/25 48%) Male Melanoma Hypophysitis in 25 patients Hypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, visual defects (unrelated to hypophysitis) NR
Bai et al (2020) [45] CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4+PD1, CTLA4+PDL1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab Ipilimumab: 3 or 10mg/kg Nivolumab: 1-2 or >/3 mg/kg Pembrolizumab: 2mg/kg NR 1144 18-44: 7.2% 45-64: 44.99% >65: 47.78% ~64% male Melanoma, Lung, RCC, Prostate, Gastric, Head/neck, Ovarian IIH - MRI normal in 93% patients Hypopituitarism NR NR
Kobayashi et al (2020) [46] CTLA-4, PD-1, PDL-1, CTLA-4+PD-1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab Ipilimumab 3mg/kg every 3 weeks Nivolumab 2-3mg/kg every 2-3 weeks Pembrolizumab 2mg/kg or 200mg every 3 weeks Atezolizumab 1200mg every 3 weeks Ipilimumab for 4 cycles NR for the rest 16 67±10 (NSCLC) 69±12 (MM) 79 (73.1%) Male in NSCLC 39 (59.1%) Male in MM NSCLC and MM IIH Hypopituitarism Fatigue, appetite loss, and weight loss, Physiological doses of hydrocortisone (10–20mg/day) with HRT
Yano et al (2020) [47] CTLA-4, PD-1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab NR NR 11 39-70 61.9+/- 9.5 for pituitary irAEs 6/11 (54.54%) Male MM, NSCLC or gastric IIH - Thickening of the pituitary stalk, enlargement of the pituitary gland Hypopituitarism - secondary adrenal sufficiency NR Physiological dose of hydrocortisone
Kurokawa et al (2020) [48] CTLA-4, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR NR 20 Mean 57.7 (30-86) yrs 10/20 (50%) male Melanoma IIH - Enlargement of the pituitary gland and stalk, hypo enhancing lesions Hypopituitarism Fatigue, malaise, vomiting, anorexia, numbness, oedema NR
Seejore et al (2021) [49] CTLA4 +PD1 Ipilimumab + Nivolumab Ipilimumab: 3mg/kg 4 weekly Nivolumab: 1mg/kg 1-4 cycles 24 Median 58.8 (23.5-80.9) 125/188 (66%) Male Melanoma Hypophysitis in 24 patients (13%) Hypopituitarism Fatigue, headache and dizziness Glucocorticoid therapy in all patients
Kotwal et al (2021) [50] CTLA4, PD1, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR NR 26 Mean 61.7 (19.9–93.4) 14/26 (53%) Male Melanoma and solid organ tumours IIH in 30/48 (62.5%) Hypopituitarism, thyroiditis Headache, diplopia and visual symptoms High-dose glucocorticoids patients with mass effect symptoms
Kanie et al (2021) [51] CTLA-4+PD-1, PD-1, PDL-1 NR NR NR 20 35 - 87 (Average 66.9) 16/20 (80%) male NSCLC, RCC, melanoma, stomach, urinary tract, oesophageal, large cell NET, submandibular Pituitary enlargement, atrophy or no change Isolated ACTH deficiency NR NR
Amereller et al (2021) [52] CTLA-4, PD-1, CTLA-4+PD-1 Ipilimumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, Ipilimumab+Pembrolizumab NR Median of 4 doses (range 2–14) 56 (60 were primary hypophysitis) 60±14 (22–87) in IIH and 45±16 (15–83) in PH Male sex - 36/56 (64%) in IIH and 16/60 (27%) in PH NR IIH Pituitary enlargement, thickened pituitary stalk or space-occupying intrasellar lesions Hypopituitarism Fatigue, headache, nausea, dizziness, visual impairment, Polyuria with polydipsia NR
Iglesias et al (2021) [53] CTLA-4, PD-1, PDL-1, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Durvalumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR NR 60 Mean age at diagnosis was 63.2±11.6 37/60 (61.7%) Male Melanoma, lung, breast, kidney, ovary, gastric, urothelial and colon IIH Isolated ACTH deficiency Fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea Hydrocortisone replacement therapy
Iglesias et al (2021) [54] PD-1, CTLA-4, PDL-1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab, Durvalumab, Atezolizumab, Tremelimumab, Spartalizumab NR NR 37 64.7 ± 8.3 years (Range 46–79) 23/37 (62.2%) Male Lung, melanoma, Head/neck, Urothelial, RCC, Colon IIH - abnormal MRI in 3 patients Hypopituitarism - IAD Fatigue, malaise, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, syncope Hydrocortisone (n=31, median 50mg), followed by prednisone (n=5, median 60mg) and methylprednisolone (n=1, median 50mg)
Takagi et al (2021) [55] CTLA-4+PD-1 Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR NR 22 66+/- 13 17/22 (77%) Male RCC NR Hypopituitarism Fatigue, weakness, fever Maintenance dose of steroids
Nguyen et al (2021) [56] CTLA4, PD1, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab + Ipilimumab NR NR 62 Mean 64 (57–67) 48/62(77.4%) male Melanoma, prostate, RCC, NSCLC, PTC and CMML IIH in 47/61 (77%) Hypopituitarism - central adrenal insufficiency Headache, fatigue, visual defects, polyuria, polydipsia Glucocorticoid therapy (either physiologic or high dose) at diagnosis
Kobayashi et al (2021) [57] CTLA-4, PD-1, PDL-1, CTLA-4+PD-1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR NR 22 NR NR Melanoma, NSCLC, RCC IIH Hypopituitarism NR NR
Takayasu et al (2022) [58] CTLA-4+PD-1, PD-1, PDL-1 Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, Durvalumab NR NR 17 67.1±9.8 12/17 (70.58%) Male RCC, Lung, Melanoma NR Hypopituitarism - Secondary adrenal insufficiency General fatigue and general weakness, appetite/weight loss, gastrointestinal symptoms, hypotension, apathy, lethargy, anxiety, fever, arthralgia NR
Druce et al (2022) [59] CTLA-4, PD-1, CTLA-4+PD-1 NR NR NR 265 Median 65.5 178/265 (67.1%) Male Melanoma, Genitourinary, head/neck and GI NR Central adrenal insufficiency Fatigue, weakness, poor oral intake, low blood pressure, nausea and vomiting Glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid treatment regimens are suggested at physiologic doses
Jessel et al (2022) [60] CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Atezolizumab Ipilimumab 3mg/kg NR for the rest Ipilimumab +Nivolumab: Median 4 Atezolizumab: Median 6.5 Ipilimumab: Median 4.5 49 Median 64(32-83) 47/69(68%) male Melanoma, RCC and Merkel cell carcinoma IIH Hypopituitarism Fatigue, headache, nausea, vomiting Steroids
Lu et al (2022) [61] CTLA4, PD1, PDL-1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Cemiplimab, Atezolizumab, Avelumab and Durvalumab NR NR 1180 61.9±12.4 (Confirmed PAI) 65.1±10.8(Suspected PAI) 738/1180 (62.5%) male Melanoma, NSCLC, RCC NR Primary adrenal insufficiency NR NR
Barnabei et al (2022) [62] CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR NR 11 Median 62 10/11(91%) male Melanoma, prostate, Bladder, AML, hypopharynx MRI high-signal intensity of the posterior pituitary may be absent Anterior + posterior central diabetes insipidus Weakness, fatigue, headache, visual impairment, anorexia, confusion, memory loss, loss of libido and erectile dysfunction, labile mood, insomnia, temperature intolerance, subjective sensation of fever, and chills High-dose corticosteroids
Barnabei et al (2022) [63] CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4+PD1, CTLA4+PDL1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Sintilimab, Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Tremelimumab+ Durvalumab 3mg/kg every 21 days in two patients for 4 doses 10mg/kg every 21 days in one patient for 4 doses Tremelimumab 1 mg/Kg 4-weekly for four cycles Durvalumab 20 mg/Kg every four weeks NR 11 30-74 10/11 Male (90.9%) Melanoma, Acute myeloid leukemia, Mekel cell carcinoma, Bladder IIH Central diabetes insipidus in isolation or as a part of panhypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, weakness, visual blurriness, and decreased libido, polydipsia and polyuria Glucocorticoid treatment in all but 2 patients + Vasopressin in 5 patients
Yamada et al (2022) [64] CTLA-4, PD-1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab NR 2-4 cycles 12 65(62-79) 8/12 (67%) Male RCC (Clear cell /Chromophobe) IIH Hypopituitarism Fatigue, loss of appetite, light-headedness, weight loss, weakness, muscle pain, joint pain Hydrocortisone at physiological doses.
Ono et al (2022) [65] CTLA-4, PD-1, PDL-1, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR 2-39 courses 13 A: 71.3±9.1 B: 57.8±11.4 A: 11/13 (84.6%) Male B: 4/4 (50%) Male NSCLC, malignant melanoma, bladder cancer, RCC and nasal cancer IIH Hypopituitarism Anorexia, fever, fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea, weight loss NR
Quandt et al (2023) [66] CTLA4, PD1, PDL1, CTLA-4+PD-1 NR NR NR 49 Mean age was 61.3 years 30/49 (61.22%) Male Melanoma-19/49 (38.8%) and other cancers-30/49 (61.22%) IIH - enlarged pituitary or empty Sella Central adrenal insufficiency, abnormal prolactin, Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism headache, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue, weakness NR
Cooksley et al (2023) [67] CTLA-4, PD1, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR 1-13 cycles 14 Median 64 (40–77) 10/14(74.1%) male Melanoma, RCC, Colorectal, gastric and NSCLC IIH- normal MRI in 9 patients Hypopituitarism Fatigue, headache, nausea and postural dizziness Oral hydrocortisone (20 mg in the morning, 10 mg at lunchtime and 10 mg in the evening)
Johnson et al (2023) [68] CTLA-4, PD-1, or PD-L1 or CTLA4+PD1/PDL1 NR NR NR 16 Mean 64.9 56.6% Male Melanoma, RCC, NSCLC, SCLC, NET IIH Hypopituitarism NR High-dose glucocorticoids
Chiloiro et al (2023) [69] CTLA-4, PD-1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab Ipilimumab: 3mg/kg Nivolumab: 240mg every 15 days Mean 7.5 cycles 9 Median 59 (SD: 16.8, minimum: 41, maximum: 83) 6/9 (66.66%) male Melanoma, lung / kidney adenocarcinoma IIH Hypopituitarism Asthenia, diarrhoea, fever Replacement hydrocortisone
Amylidi et al (2023) [70] PD-1, CTLA-4+PD-1 Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR NR 4 Median 57 2/4 males Melanoma, NSCLC, mesothelioma IIH in 2 patients (Enlargement / enhancement / mild swelling of the pituitary gland) Hypopituitarism Case 3 - muscle weakness and fatigue Case 4 - Exhaustion, anorexia, dizziness, and nausea. Case 3 - only HRT Case 4 - Hydrocortisone
Aviv-Shimoni et al (2023) [71] CTLA-4, PD-1, PDL-1, CTLA-4+PD-1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Durvalumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab+Pembrolizumab NR NR 19 56 (IQR 51–69) 7/19 (36.84%) Male Melanoma, RCC, Kidney, breast, Ovary, Lung NR Isolated autoimmune ACTH deficiency Asthenia, weakness, loss of appetite and/or diarrhoea Glucocorticoids in a physiologic dose (usually 5 mg prednisone daily)
Galligan et al (2023) [72] Single-agent ICI(NR), BRAF+MEK inhibitor before ICI NR NR median of 3 cycles (range 1–14) 31 Median age of 60 (IQR 49– 69) 32/51 (62.7%) Male Melanoma IIH in 31 patients Hypopituitarism Lethargy, headache, anorexia, nausea, visual disturbance, weight loss Prolonged supraphysiological doses of Glucocorticoids
Hara et al (2023) [73] CTLA-4, PD-1, PDL-1, CTLA-4+PD-1 Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR Median cycles 8.79 ± 9.64 15 70.0 ± 7.86 10/14 (71.42%) Male Lung cancer, Malignant melanoma Hodgkin lymphoma, RCC Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 11 cases of PD, none of which showed pituitary enlargement. Hypopituitarism Fatigue, weight loss, thirst, loss of appetite, and weakness NR
Fischer et al (2024) [74] CTLA-4+PD-1, PD-1 Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab NR NR 28 69.6, 46.2–76.6 (Cases) 66.4, 45.1–79.5 (Controls) 57% male in both groups Melanoma (Overall, 10 patients received an MRI of the brain within 24 days prior to diagnosis and 6 days after diagnosis. Among them, 6/10 (60%) had positive findings on MRI). The diagnosis of hypophysitis was made at a median of 83 (range, 26–210) days after the initiation of ICI treatment. FDG PET/CT was acquired at a median of 71 days (range, 5–158) after starting ICI therapy in the case group and a median of 77 days (range, 26–149) in the control group. Hypopituitarism Fatigue, weakness, headache, disturbed vision, nausea NR
Iwama et al (2024) [75] CTLA4 +PD1 Ipilimumab + Nivolumab 3mg/kg (1mg/kg for NSCLC, RCC mesothelioma) Ipilimumab: 2.8±1.2(Multi-D) and 2.9±0.9 (IAD) cycles Nivolumab: 3.0 (2.0–6.0) cycles for Multi-D and 4.0 (3.0–7.0) cycles in IAD 41 A - 71 (64–76) B - 68 (63–74) A - 75% Male (12/16) B- 60% male (15/25) A - Melanoma >NSCLC, RCC, mesothelioma B - NSCLC > Melanoma >RCC IIH A - 16 out of 74 (21.6%) B - 25 out of 748 (3.3%) Hypopituitarism (multi-hormone deficiency) NR Brief mention of HRT
Patel et al (2024) [76] CTLA4, PD1, PDL-1, PD1+CTLA4 NR NR Average 37 cycles 37 Mean 65 70% Male Melanoma, kidney, lung Pleura, Prostate IIH Hypopituitarism: HPA axis dysfunction Fatigue, Nausea, Headache, new-onset confusion, Vomiting, Joint discomfort Glucocorticoid therapy
Mitri et al (2024) [77] CTLA4, PD1, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab Ipilimumab (10 mg/kg; 3 mg/kg) or ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) plus Nivolumab (1 mg/kg) or pembrolizumab (200 mg fixed dose) vs. matched controls NR 40 Median 59 (20-77) 27/40 (68%) Male Melanoma IIH Hypopituitarism Weakness, dizziness, altered mental status, abdominal pain, nausea, cephalgia NR
Van der Leij et al (2024) [78] CTLA4, PD1, CTLA4+PD1 NR NR NR 67 60.4 years (SD 11.3) 63% male Melanoma, RCC, Lung cancer IIH Hypopituitarism Malaise, fatigue, nausea, anorexia, dizziness, headache, visual symptoms Low-dose corticosteroids (18/67) Medium-dose corticosteroids (38/67) High-dose corticosteroids (11/67)
Sang et al (2024) [79] CTLA4, PD1, PDL-1, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Durvalumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab Nivolumab: 3mg/kg every 2 weeks Pembrolizumab: 100-200mg every 3 weeks Ipilimumab: 1mg/kg every 3 weeks Nivolumab: 7 cycles Pembrolizumab: 7-20 cycles Ipilimumab: 3 cycles 13 (no iRAEs) Mean 59(irH) and 57(non-irH) irH(69.2% male), non-irH(62.5% male) Solid organ cancers IIH - No remarkable finding / normal / poorly enhancing lesion posterior pituitary Hypopituitarism Anorexia, nausea, fatigue, dizziness, weight loss, headache NR
Wang et al (2024) [80] CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4+PD1 Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab + Ipilimumab NR NR 123 64.3 ± 12.6 79/123 (64.22%) Male Melanoma and other solid organ tumours IIH - 88 cases reported normal pituitary gland, 10 cases reported swelling or enlarged pituitary gland or hypophyseal stalk, and 4 cases reported atrophy of the pituitary gland Hypopituitarism - Isolated ACTH deficiency Fatigue, nausea, loss of appetite, vomiting, weight loss, diarrhoea, somnolence, malaise NR
Bando et al (2024) [81] CTLA-4, PD-1, PDL-1, CTLA4+PD1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab,Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab NR NR 26 68 (62–71) 19/26 (73.08%) Male Kidney, Lung, Pharynx, Skin, Oesophagus, Stomach, Uterus Normal MRI Hypopituitarism NR NR
Theiler-Schwetz et al (2024) [82] CTLA-4+PD-1, PD-1, PDL-1, LAG-3 + PD-1 Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Relatlimab + Nivolumab NR NR 18 Replacement dose group: 64 ±12.6 High dose group: 68.3±5.7 11/18 (61.1%) female (6/10 in replacement group 5/8 in high dose group) Malignant melanoma, NSCLC, SCC (Skin), RCC, breast cancer, Gastric or Colorectal cancer IIH in 2 patients. Pituitary microadenomas in 2 cases Hypopituitarism Fatigue/ asthenia, loss of appetite, weight loss, hyponatraemia High-dose glucocorticoid treatment consisted of prednisolone at a dose of 1mg/kg for two weeks followed by taper + HRT
Tang et al (2024) [83] CTLA4, PD1, PDL1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab, Atezolizumab Ipilimumab: 3 or 10mg/kg NR for the rest NR 1252 45 to 65 (Pembrolizumab: 65 to 80) NR Melanoma, NSCLC, Lung, RCC IIH (Moderately enlarged / enhanced pituitary, thickening of the pituitary stalk) Hypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, and weight loss HRT
Damien Qi et al (2025) [84] CTLA-4+PD-1, PD-1 Ipilimumab+Nivolumab+Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab+Nivolumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab NR Median treatment duration 11.1 (3.0, 15.0) months 54 64 (54, 70) 38/54 (70%) Male Melanoma, NSCLC, Gastric, Prostate, Anal SCC, RCC IIH Hypopituitarism Headache, fatigue, GI symptoms Suggested - Physiological doses of glucocorticoids

Table 4. Literature included (but not analysed) for the PDL-1 case reports category.

Literature included (but not analysed) for the PDL-1 case reports category

PD-L1: programmed death-ligand 1; ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone; NR: not reported

Author (Year of Publication) Kanie et al. (2018) [85] Matthys et al. (2022) [86] Ogbue et al. (2023) [87] Furuichi et al. (2023) [88] Al-Hiari et al. (2024) [89]
Class of ICPi PD-L1 PD-L1 PD-L1 PD-L1 PD-L1
Name of the drug Atezolizumab Durvalumab Durvalumab Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab
Dose/frequency of ICPi 1200 mg every 3 weeks 1500mg 1500 mg every 4 weeks Not mentioned Not mentioned
Duration/cycles 19 doses (56 weeks) in case 1, 18 doses (52 weeks) in case 2 2 cycles 5 cycles 8–13 cycles (24–39 weeks) 8 cycles
Total patients 2 1 1 3 1
Gender Both males Female Male All 3 males Male
Type of cancer Non-small cell lung cancer Neuroendocrine tumour Non-small cell lung cancer Hepatocellular carcinoma Hepatocellular carcinoma
Type of imaging MRI MRI MRI MRI and CT MRI
Result of imaging Hypophysitis Lymphocytic hypophysitis and limbic encephalitis Hypophysitis No abnormality Hypophysitis
Type of pituitary dysfunction / IRAE Hypopituitarism Hypopituitarism Hypopituitarism (Isolated ACTH deficiency) Hypopituitarism (secondary adrenal insufficiency) Hypopituitarism (secondary adrenal insufficiency)
Symptoms General malaise, appetite loss, diarrhoea, eosinophilia Memory deficit Headaches, light-headedness, photophobia, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, night sweats, postural drop, syncope General fatigue, appetite loss, muscle weakness, weight loss, diarrhoea, eosinophilia, difficulty walking Generalised weakness, fatigue, confusion, poor oral intake
Acute treatment Hydrocortisone 15 mg/d Not mentioned High-dose prednisone 90 mg/d Hydrocortisone 15-20 mg/d Hydrocortisone 100 mg IV loading dose and 50 mg IV doses every 6 hours for 48 hours

Statistical analysis: All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28.0. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarise the data. Categorical/qualitative variables are presented as frequencies and corresponding percentages. Quantitative variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data, or as median and interquartile range (IQR) for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

Results

A total of 907 articles were identified through the literature search, of which 123 met the eligibility criteria. Ultimately, 84 articles were included in the final review (Figure 1). There were a total of 18 papers, including 1,823 patients who were treated with CTLA-4 agents, out of which 699 were analysed for CTLA-4-associated hypophysitis (Tables 1) [6-23]. Similarly, there were 10 papers including 469 patients who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 agents, out of which 362 were included in the final analysis for PD-1/PD-L1-associated hypophysitis (Table 2) [24-33]. In comparison, 51 papers included 25,708 patients who were treated with combination therapy involving CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 agents, out of which 6,198 were included in the final analysis (Table 3) [34-84].

Table 2. Literature included and analysed for PD-1/PD-L1 category.

Literature included and analysed for the PD-1 / PD-L1 category

ICPi: immune checkpoint inhibitors; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; RCC: renal cell carcinoma; ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; NR: not reported; ICI-HP: immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hypopituitarism

Author (Year) Type of ICPi Name of the Drug Dose of ICPi Duration of ICPi Total Analysed Patients Age (years) Gender Type of Cancer Results of Imaging Type of Pituitary Dysfunction Symptomatology Treatment Given
Baxi et al. (2018) [24] PD1, PDL-1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab NR Median of nine courses (Range: 3–21) 13 NR NR NSCLC, Melanoma, RCC, bladder cancer of head and neck, SCC NR Hypopituitarism Fatigue, arthralgia NR
Faje et al (2019) [25] PD1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab NR NR 22 NR NR Melanoma, Lung cancer, Ovarian cancer, Colorectal, Breast and squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx Hypophysitis Hypopituitarism Fatigue, nausea, loss of appetite, myalgias/arthralgias, headaches, dizziness, and altered mental status Physiologic glucocorticoid doses or mildly supraphysiologic doses
Lupi et al. (2019) [26] PD1, PDL1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab Case 1: Atezolizumab: 1200mg/3 weeks, Case 2: Nivolumab: 3mg/kg every 2 weeks, Case 3: Pembrolizumab: 2mg/kg every 3 weeks, Case 4: Nivolumab: 3mg/kg every 2 weeks Case 1: After the fourth dose, Case 2: After the sixth cycle, Cases 3 and 4: 4 months 4 78,80,43, 60 3 males and 1 female 2 metastatic melanoma, 2 NSCLC Did not reveal specific signs of pituitary inflammation Hypopituitarism: central hypoadrenalism and hyponatraemia Nausea, headache, vomiting, drowsiness, fatigue, muscle weakness, fever, asthenia Hydrocortisone
Levy et al. (2020) [27] PD1, PDL-1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Tislelizumab, Atezolizumab Pembrolizumab every three weeks at a dose of 2 mg/kg for 1 patient with melanoma. NR for other 16 patients Median of nine courses (Range: 3–21) 17 64 ± 8.2 years 13/17(76.5%) Male Melanoma, NSCLC, HCC, RCC, cutaneous T cell lymphoma No pituitary abnormality Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency; other pituitary deficiencies were less common Fatigue, nausea or loss of appetite, headache High-dose hydrocortisone followed by oral hydrocortisone at replacement doses (15 to 20 mg per day)
Bellastella et al. (2021) [28] PD1, PDL-1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Avelumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab NR NR 37 PD1 and 17 PDL1 65 ± 10.7 Longitudinal study- 70.6 ± 10.4 35/54 (64.81%) Male Longitudinal study: 10/13(76.92%) Male Lung cancer, Melanoma NR Hypopituitarism: Low ACTH and IGF-1, raised prolactin NR NR
Han et al. (2022) [29] PD1 Camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks with oral Apatinib 250 mg daily 11 cycles of Camrelizumab in 1st case 10 cycles of Camrelizumab in 2nd case 8 cycles of Camrelizumab in 3rd case 3 60,68,69 years All 3 males NSCLC, HCC, RCC Hypophysitis, empty Sella Hypopituitarism General malaise and appetite loss, syncope, hypotension, diarrhoea Methylprednisolone (2 mg/kg) for maximum of 5 days, followed by maintenance dose of hydrocortisone/prednisolone
Chen et al. (2023) [30] PD-1, PDL-1 Sintilimab, Pembrolizumab, Toripalimab, Camrelizumab, Tislelizumab, Nivolumab, Atezolizumab Sintilimab (200 mg, 3 weekly), Pembrolizumab (200 mg, 3 weekly), Toripalimab (240 mg, 3 weekly), Camrelizumab (200 mg, 2 weekly), Tislelizumab (240 mg, 2 weekly), Nivolumab (unknown, 2 weekly), Atezolizumab (1200 mg, 3 weekly), drug A/B in clinical trial (unknown, 3 weekly) NR 28 61.2±10.9 16/28 (57.14%) Male Cervical, Nasopharyngeal, Lung, Oesophageal, Gastric HCC, cholangiocarcinoma, RCC, Melanoma, Breast cancer Hypophysitis Isolated ACTH deficiency, Primary hypothyroidism, Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus Fatigue, nausea, headache, thirst, polydipsia Intravenous corticosteroids, with a median dose of 200 (50–250) mg
Yang et al. (2024) [31] PD1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Sintilimab, Camrelizumab, Tislelizumab NR Average duration of the use of PD‐1 inhibitors: 13.50 weeks (range: 3.00–56.00 weeks) 14 65.00 ± 6.82 (Age range: 51.00–75.00 yrs old) 11/14 (78.57%) Male Malignant melanoma, Oesophageal, Lung ca, Colorectal, HCC, Bladder No abnormalities on MRI Isolated ACTH deficiency Fatigue, loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, fever, memory loss, disturbance of consciousness, visual impairment, headache Glucocorticoid replacement therapy (Prednisolone 2.5 to 7.5 mg/day or equivalent)
Suzuki et al. (2024) [32] PD-1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab NR NR 194 <75 =156 (80.4%) ≥75 = 38 (19.6%) 146/194(75.3%) Male NSCLC NR Pituitary dysfunction, thyroiditis NR None of the patients with pituitary dysfunction was treated with high-dose glucocorticoids
Iwamoto et al. (2024) [33] PD1, PDL-1 Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Avelumab NR Time from ICI administration to diagnosis of ICI-HP was 125 (56-212) days 13 66 (57-69) 10/13 (76.92%) Male Melanoma, RCC, HCC, GI, NSCLC, Gingival, unknown primary Empty Sella, thickening of pituitary stalk, hypophysitis, normal pituitary Isolated ACTH deficiency General malaise, decreased appetite, headache, hypoglycaemia, decreased consciousness, high fever, amenorrhoea, mood disturbance NR

Demographics

In the CTLA-4 group, 69% of participants were male (n = 485) [6-23]. In the PD-1/PD-L1 group, 8 out of 10 studies (n = 327) reported gender-specific data, with males comprising 72% of participants (n = 237) [26-33]. In comparison, the combination therapy group reported 68% male participants (n = 3,283) across 49 of the 51 studies that included gender analysis (n = 4,839) [34-57, 59-82, 84]. Age data were reported with varying completeness and formats across the included studies. In the CTLA-4 group, 17 out of 18 studies (n = 674) reported participant age [6-15, 17-23], with mean ages ranging from 55.5 to 68.2 years and a pooled (unweighted) mean of approximately 63.4 years. Reported age ranges spanned from 31 to 82 years, with standard deviations (SD) ranging from ±1.3 to ±11.2 years, indicating moderate variability. Median ages, where reported, were consistent with the means (60 and 62.1 years). In the PD-1/PD-L1 group, 8 of 10 studies (n = 146) provided age data [26-33], with mean ages ranging from 61.2 to 70.6 years and a pooled unweighted mean of approximately 65.5 years. Age ranges spanned 43 to 80 years, and SDs varied widely (±4.03 to ±15.02). One study using categorical bands reported that 80.4% of participants were younger than 75 years [32]. In the combination therapy group, age was reported in 50 studies (n = 6,176), though formats varied (means, medians, ranges, and age bands) [34-57, 59-84]. Mean ages ranged from 57.7 to 70.0 years, with an unweighted pooled mean of approximately 63.9 years. SDs ranged from ±5.7 to ±14.3 years, and median ages (where reported) ranged from 57 to 65 years. Reported age ranges were broad (15 to 93.4 years), though most participants were between 45 and 80 years.

Dosing

All patients in the CTLA-4 group (n = 699) were treated with ipilimumab [6-23]. Out of 18 papers reviewed, 17 reported dosing information [6-22], with 13 of those specifying exact doses for a total of 268 patients. However, dosing was not specified for 428 patients, and dosing details were not reported (NR) for 3 patients [8,23]. Among the 268 patients with specified doses, 157 received 3 mg/kg, while 111 patients were administered doses greater than 3 mg/kg. Dosing of ipilimumab typically started at 3 mg/kg, with dose escalation to 9 or 10 mg/kg if no objective tumour response was observed after initial doses, provided no grade III/IV toxicity occurred. Several patients received between 3 and 10 mg/kg, with common regimens including 3 mg/kg alone or followed by lower maintenance doses (e.g., 1 mg/kg). Across multiple studies, approximately half of patients were treated with the standard 3 mg/kg dose, while the remainder received escalated doses above 3 mg/kg. Dose escalation protocols and variations were common, with the maximum dose reaching 9 or 10 mg/kg in many cases.

Duration of treatment before development of hypophysitis: 15 out of 18 papers reported the total duration of ipilimumab administration before patients developed hypophysitis (n = 634) [6-16, 19-22]. Ipilimumab is typically given every three weeks for a standard induction of four doses. While most studies followed this schedule, the total number of cycles varied widely, ranging from one to twelve before hypophysitis onset. The average number of cycles usually falls between two and four. Some studies also described maintenance dosing every three months for up to three years after induction. Mean cycles at diagnosis were around 3.3, with total cycles near 4.4, and no significant differences were observed between groups. Overall, patients with hypophysitis showed notable variation in treatment duration, with some receiving as few as two cycles and others up to twelve. Despite this variability, most papers adhered to the every-three-week schedule up to four cycles, with an average of two to four cycles reported before hypophysitis onset.

In the PD-1/PDL1 group (n = 362), the most used PD-1 inhibitors associated with hypophysitis were nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, tislelizumab, and toripalimab. The PD-L1 inhibitors used included avelumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab.

Dosing

In the PD-1/PD-L1 group, 4 out of 10 studies reported treatment regimens (n = 52), with common regimens including fixed doses or weight-based dosing [26,27,29,30]. Nivolumab was frequently administered at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, while pembrolizumab was often given at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks or as a fixed 200 mg dose every 3 weeks. Camrelizumab and tislelizumab were typically dosed at 200 mg and 240 mg every two weeks, respectively, whereas sintilimab and toripalimab were administered at 200 mg and 240 mg every three weeks, respectively. For PD-L1 inhibitors, atezolizumab was commonly given as a fixed dose of 1200 mg every three weeks. Dosing information for avelumab and durvalumab was NR.

Duration of treatment before development of hypophysitis: Across multiple studies, including data reported in half of the reviewed papers (5 out of 10), the median duration to onset of hypophysitis was approximately 28 weeks after starting PD-1/PDL1 therapy, though this varies widely from 10 to 46 weeks [26,27,29,31,33]. Individual cases demonstrate variability, with symptoms developing after as few as four to six cycles, and others after several months. For example, patients treated with camrelizumab experienced onset between eight and eleven cycles, roughly 16 to 22 weeks [29].

Among a total of 6,198 patients in the combination group, the CTLA-4 inhibitors administered were ipilimumab and tremelimumab; the PD-L1 inhibitors included atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab; and the PD-1 inhibitors used were nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, cemiplimab, and spartalizumab.

Dosing

Among combination group therapies reported in 21 out of 51 papers [34,35,37,39,40,42-46,49,58,60,63,69-71,75,77,79,83,84], ipilimumab dosing varied between 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg every 3 to 4 weeks, typically for four cycles, with higher doses associated with an increased risk of hypophysitis. Tremelimumab was typically given at 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Nivolumab doses ranged from 1 to 3 mg/kg or a fixed 240 mg every 2 to 3 weeks, often used alone or in combination with ipilimumab. Combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab involves lower ipilimumab doses (1-3 mg/kg) alongside nivolumab, administered over 3 to 4 cycles. Pembrolizumab was administered at 2 mg/kg or 100-200 mg every 3 weeks. Additionally, atezolizumab was dosed at 1200 mg every 3 weeks, and durvalumab at 20 mg/kg every 4 weeks. These regimens reflect the diversity of dosing strategies used in combination ICPi treatments across studies. Treatment durations and cumulative doses vary widely, reflecting different protocols and patient populations. Overall, the dosing regimens highlight a balance between efficacy and immune-related adverse event risks, particularly with higher ipilimumab doses.

Duration of treatment before development of hypophysitis: Out of 51 reviewed studies, 22 reported treatment duration data for immune checkpoint inhibitors (n = 1273) [34,35,37,39,40,42-46,49,58,60,63,69-71,75,77,79,83,84]. Median treatment cycles before they developed hypophysitis varied by drug: nivolumab was administered for approximately 7 cycles, pembrolizumab ranged from 7 to 20 cycles, and ipilimumab was typically given for 3 to 4.5 cycles. Combination therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab showed a median of 4 cycles before hypophysitis onset. For anti-PD-1 agents overall, the median treatment duration was about 6.5 cycles. These data suggest that hypophysitis often occurs within the first several cycles, particularly with ipilimumab-containing regimens, which tend to have shorter treatment durations compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapies. This highlights the importance of close monitoring during early treatment cycles to manage potential toxicities effectively.

Imaging

In the CTLA-4 group, all 699 patients underwent MRI [6 to 23], out of which 235 had radiological evidence of hypophysitis. The most common biochemical abnormality in the CTLA-4 group was hypopituitarism. Similarly, in the PD-1/PD-L1 group, imaging modalities were reported in 8 out of 10 studies (n = 101) [25,26-31,33]. MRI was used in all reported cases, with 53 patients showing radiological evidence of hypophysitis. Additionally, 13 patients exhibited nonspecific abnormalities such as stalk abnormalities or empty sella, while 35 patients had normal scans. The most common biochemical abnormality in the PD-1/PD-L1 group was isolated ACTH deficiency. In the combination group, imaging modalities were reported in 46 out of 51 studies [34,36-54,56,57,60,62-70,72-84], comprising a total of 4,685 patients. Among these, 44 studies used MRI, one study used biopsy [35], and one study used FDG-PET/CT in combination with either CT or MRI [72]. Reported abnormalities included radiological evidence of hypophysitis, pituitary stalk abnormalities, pituitary enlargement, microadenoma, pituitary atrophy, and empty sella. Some patients showed no radiological abnormalities. The most common biochemical abnormalities in the combination group were hypopituitarism and secondary AI. Overall, while MRI is a key diagnostic tool, it may not always detect subtle or early-stage pituitary involvement, underscoring the importance of integrating clinical, biochemical, and radiological data in the evaluation of ICI-related pituitary dysfunction. Treatment: In CTLA-4-associated hypophysitis, reported in 17 out of 18 studies [6-10, 12-23], high-dose glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone or prednisolone at 1 mg/kg for approximately two weeks are commonly administered, followed by a tapering regimen to reach a physiological maintenance dose. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is often necessary, including hydrocortisone or low-dose prednisolone, fludrocortisone, thyroxine, desmopressin (DDAVP), and sex hormone replacements, depending on the specific hormone deficits. Isolated ACTH deficiency (IAD), a frequent outcome, is generally irreversible and requires lifelong corticosteroid replacement. In PD-1/PD-L1 associated hypophysitis, reported in 7 out of 10 studies [25-27,29-32], treatment typically involves intravenous corticosteroids with a median dose of 200 mg (range: 50-300 mg), followed by maintenance therapy using low-dose prednisolone or hydrocortisone (2.5-7.5 mg/day). For combination therapy (CTLA-4 plus PD-1/PD-L1), 35 out of 51 studies [34,35,37-40,42,43,46,47,49,50,53-56,59,60,62-64,67-72,75,76,78,80-84] reported similar use of high-dose supraphysiological corticosteroids with a taper to physiological doses, along with comprehensive HRT as needed. Across all ICI types, high-dose glucocorticoid initiation, careful tapering, and tailored long-term hormone replacement remain the mainstays of management.

Discussion

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) has significantly transformed the therapeutic landscape of oncology, with an ever-growing number of indications across a wide spectrum of malignancies. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remain a substantial clinical concern, among which endocrinopathies are particularly common [90,91]. Hypophysitis is a notable endocrine irAE linked to ICPi therapy, presenting diagnostic and management challenges due to its nonspecific symptomatology, frequent concomitant use of exogenous glucocorticoids, and the potential for long-term or permanent multi-hormonal deficiencies resulting from panhypopituitarism [92].

Demographically, the weighted average percentage of male participants across all three treatment groups was approximately 68.3%. Age distributions were similar, with pooled mean ages in the early to mid-60s, though reporting heterogeneity was noted.

All patients in the CTLA-4 inhibitor group received ipilimumab, with 3 mg/kg being the most commonly used dose in clinical practice. Higher doses were reserved for escalation in selected responsive and tolerable cases. Hypophysitis associated with ipilimumab, or CTLA-4 combination therapy, tended to be more severe and occurred earlier compared to that associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Our analysis confirms that ICPi-induced hypophysitis typically emerges within the first few months of therapy but may present at variable time points depending on treatment modality and patient-specific factors.

In terms of cancer types treated, the CTLA-4 inhibitor group primarily included melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and prostate cancer (Table 1). The PD-1/PD-L1 group covered a broader range of malignancies, including metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), oesophageal cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, breast cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)(Table 2). The combination therapy group included the full spectrum of cancers treated with PD-1/PD-L1 agents, in addition to malignancies such as pleural mesothelioma, acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), Hodgkin lymphoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) (Table 3). This distribution reflects the expanding use of ICPis across both solid tumours and haematologic malignancies, with combination therapy employed in the most diverse range of indications.

Clinical presentations showed overlapping but distinct symptom profiles across treatment groups. In the CTLA-4 group, commonly reported symptoms included headache, fatigue, visual disturbances, dizziness, hyponatraemia, decreased libido, nausea or anorexia, confusion, mood changes, weight loss, hot flushes, and myalgias/arthralgias (Table 1). The PD-1/PD-L1 group presented with fatigue, headaches, nausea or vomiting, anorexia, hyponatraemia, hypotension, and myalgias/arthralgias. Some reports also described dizziness, altered mental status, visual changes, fever, amenorrhoea, hypoglycaemia, aspergillosis, and memory loss (Table 2). The combination therapy group exhibited the broadest symptom spectrum, including fatigue, confusion, hypotension, headache, visual disturbances, hyponatraemia, anorexia, weight loss, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, somnolence, dizziness, altered mental status, eosinophilia, fever, rash, syncope, psychiatric symptoms (e.g., apathy, anxiety, memory loss, labile mood, lethargy), insomnia, loss of libido, erectile dysfunction, and myalgias/arthralgias (Table 3).

Our systematic review highlights hypopituitarism as a frequent and often persistent consequence of ICPi-associated hypophysitis, emphasising the importance of early recognition to mitigate long-term endocrine morbidity. Hypophysitis induced by CTLA-4 inhibitors, particularly ipilimumab and CTLA-4-based combination therapies, is more commonly associated with hypopituitarism than that caused by other ICPi classes. In contrast, isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency, more frequently observed with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, typically presents as secondary AI, often without distinct abnormalities on early MRI imaging. High-dose glucocorticoid initiation, careful tapering, and tailored long-term hormone replacement remained the mainstays of management.

Limitations

Several limitations should be acknowledged in this review. First, significant heterogeneity existed among the included studies in terms of study design, patient populations, cancer types, dosing regimens, and follow-up durations, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Reporting inconsistencies, particularly regarding dosing details, duration of therapy, and timing of hypophysitis onset, constrained the ability to perform quantitative meta-analysis and may introduce bias.

Age and gender data were variably reported, and some studies used categorical age bands rather than continuous measures, complicating pooled demographic analyses. Imaging modalities and criteria for radiological diagnosis of hypophysitis also varied, potentially affecting the sensitivity and specificity of detection across cohorts.

Moreover, most data were derived from retrospective observational studies and case series, which are subject to selection bias, incomplete data capture, and variable diagnostic criteria. The lack of standardised protocols for the diagnosis and management of ICI-related hypophysitis across studies further complicates direct comparisons and synthesis of therapeutic outcomes.

Finally, long-term follow-up data on endocrine recovery and patient outcomes post-hypophysitis were limited, impeding a comprehensive understanding of prognosis and optimal hormone replacement strategies. Future prospective multicentre studies employing standardised diagnostic criteria, uniform treatment protocols, and systematic long-term monitoring are essential to enhance understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical course, and optimal management of ICI-associated hypophysitis.

Future scope/research

The future scope of ICPi-associated hypophysitis involves several key areas to enhance diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Prospective, multicentre studies with standardised diagnostic criteria-encompassing clinical, biochemical, and radiological parameters-are essential to ensure consistency and improve generalisability across diverse populations and cancer types. Longitudinal follow-up is crucial to better understand the natural history, rates of endocrine recovery, and long-term outcomes such as quality of life and survival. Further research into predictive biomarkers and underlying mechanisms will support early detection and risk stratification. Comparative studies examining different immune checkpoint inhibitor dosing regimens and treatment durations are needed to optimise oncologic efficacy while minimising endocrine toxicity. Finally, the development and validation of standardised management protocols, including glucocorticoid therapy and hormone replacement strategies, will be critical for improving the care and outcomes of affected patients.

Conclusions

This systematic review delineates the distinct clinical, radiological, and therapeutic profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi)-associated hypophysitis across CTLA-4 inhibitor monotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy, and combination ICPi regimens.CTLA-4 inhibitors, particularly ipilimumab, are linked to earlier onset and multifaceted hypopituitarism with more frequent MRI abnormalities, while PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors typically cause delayed, isolated ACTH deficiency with variable imaging findings. Combination therapy presents the widest clinical variability and greatest risk of hypophysitis. High-dose glucocorticoid therapy remains the primary intervention, with subsequent tapering to physiological maintenance doses complemented by individualised HRT. Notably, MRI sensitivity is limited for early or subtle pituitary involvement, necessitating a multidisciplinary diagnostic approach integrating clinical assessment and endocrine evaluation. Vigilant monitoring and early, multidisciplinary diagnosis are essential to reduce morbidity and optimise outcomes in patients receiving immune checkpoint therapy.

Acknowledgments

Pooja SirDeshpande and Soorya Bavikeri Shivakumara Hegde contributed equally to the work and should be considered co-first authors.

Disclosures

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Pooja SirDeshpande, Soorya Bavikeri Shivakumara Hegde, Hassan Akhtar

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Pooja SirDeshpande, Soorya Bavikeri Shivakumara Hegde

Drafting of the manuscript:  Pooja SirDeshpande, Soorya Bavikeri Shivakumara Hegde

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Pooja SirDeshpande, Soorya Bavikeri Shivakumara Hegde, Hassan Akhtar

Supervision:  Hassan Akhtar

References

  • 1.Endocrine toxicity of cancer immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoints. Chang LS, Barroso-Sousa R, Tolaney SM, Hodi FS, Kaiser UB, Min L. Endocr Rev. 2019;40:17–65. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Science. 2018;359:1350–1355. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Endocrine toxicity of cancer immunotherapy: Clinical challenges. Anderson B, Morganstein DL. Endocr Connect. 2021;10:0–24. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.French Endocrine Society Guidance on endocrine side effects of immunotherapy. Castinetti F, Albarel F, Archambeaud F, et al. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2019;26:0. doi: 10.1530/ERC-18-0320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Endocrine-related adverse conditions in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibition: An ESE clinical practice guideline. Husebye ES, Castinetti F, Criseno S, et al. Eur J Endocrinol. 2022;187:0. doi: 10.1530/EJE-22-0689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 blockage can induce autoimmune hypophysitis in patients with metastatic melanoma and renal cancer. Blansfield JA, Beck KE, Tran K, et al. J Immunother. 2005;28:593–598. doi: 10.1097/01.cji.0000178913.41256.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4 antibody) causes regression of metastatic renal cell cancer associated with enteritis and hypophysitis. Yang JC, Hughes M, Kammula U, et al. J Immunother. 2007;30:825–830. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e318156e47e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy associated autoimmune hypophysitis: Serious immune related adverse events across a spectrum of cancer subtypes. Dillard T, Yedinak CG, Alumkal J, Fleseriu M. Pituitary. 2010;13:29–38. doi: 10.1007/s11102-009-0193-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hypophysitis caused by ipilimumab in cancer patients: Hormone replacement or immunosuppressive therapy. Lammert A, Schneider HJ, Bergmann T, et al. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2013;121:581–587. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1355337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ipilimumab treatment associated pituitary hypophysitis: Clinical presentation and imaging diagnosis. Chodakiewitz Y, Brown S, Boxerman JL, Brody JM, Rogg JM. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;125:125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pituitary expression of CTLA-4 mediates hypophysitis secondary to administration of CTLA-4 blocking antibody. Iwama S, De Remigis A, Callahan MK, Slovin SF, Wolchok JD, Caturegli P. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:230. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis: A detailed longitudinal analysis in a large cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma. Faje AT, Sullivan R, Lawrence D, Tritos NA, Fadden R, Klibanski A, Nachtigall L. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:4078–4085. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis: Review of the literature. Araujo PB, Coelho MC, Arruda M, Gadelha MR, Neto LV. J Endocrinol Invest. 2015;38:1159–1166. doi: 10.1007/s40618-015-0301-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis in melanoma patients: An Australian case series. Lam T, Chan MM, Sweeting AN, et al. Intern Med J. 2015;45:1066–1073. doi: 10.1111/imj.12819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Long-term follow-up of ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis, a common adverse event of the anti-CTLA-4 antibody in melanoma. Albarel F, Gaudy C, Castinetti F, et al. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172:195–204. doi: 10.1530/EJE-14-0845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Systemic high-dose corticosteroid treatment does not improve the outcome of ipilimumab-related hypophysitis: A retrospective cohort study. Min L, Hodi FS, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:749–755. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Immunotherapy and hypophysitis: Clinical presentation, treatment, and biologic insights. Faje A. Pituitary. 2016;19:82–92. doi: 10.1007/s11102-015-0671-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy associated hypophysitis. Mahzari M, Liu D, Arnaout A, Lochnan H. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2015;8:21–28. doi: 10.4137/CMED.S22469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Prevalence of hypophysitis in a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma and prostate cancer treated with ipilimumab. Brilli L, Danielli R, Ciuoli C, et al. Endocrine. 2017;58:535–541. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1289-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fall in thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) may be an early marker of ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis. De Sousa SM, Sheriff N, Tran CH, Menzies AM, Tsang VH, Long GV, Tonks KT. Pituitary. 2018;21:274–282. doi: 10.1007/s11102-018-0866-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.High-dose glucocorticoids for the treatment of ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis is associated with reduced survival in patients with melanoma. Faje AT, Lawrence D, Flaherty K, et al. Cancer. 2018;124:3706–3714. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis, a single academic center experience. Snyders T, Chakos D, Swami U, et al. Pituitary. 2019;22:488–496. doi: 10.1007/s11102-019-00978-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Primary and ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis: A single-center case series. Atkins P, Ur E. Endocr Res. 2020;45:246–253. doi: 10.1080/07435800.2020.1817064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Immune-related adverse events for anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 drugs: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Baxi S, Yang A, Gennarelli RL, Khan N, Wang Z, Boyce L, Korenstein D. BMJ. 2018;360:0. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hypophysitis secondary to nivolumab and pembrolizumab is a clinical entity distinct from ipilimumab-associated hypophysitis. Faje A, Reynolds K, Zubiri L, et al. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;181:211–219. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Clinical heterogeneity of hypophysitis secondary to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: Insights from four cases. Lupi I, Brancatella A, Cosottini M, et al. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2019;2019 doi: 10.1530/EDM-19-0102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1-induced hypophysitis: A cohort study of 17 patients with longitudinal follow-up. Levy M, Abeillon J, Dalle S, et al. J Clin Med. 2020;9:3280. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hypothalamic-pituitary autoimmunity in patients treated with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Bellastella G, Carbone C, Scappaticcio L, et al. Cancers. 2021;13:4036. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hypophysitis: A rare but noteworthy immune-related adverse event secondary to camrelizumab therapy. Han X, Meng M, Zhang T, et al. J Cancer Res Ther. 2022;18:1440–1443. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_831_21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency following immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment often occurs in polyglandular endocrinopathies. Chen H, Zhang L, Zhao L, Li X. BMC Endocr Disord. 2023;23:139. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01397-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pituitary-related immune adverse events induced by programmed death Protein-1 inhibitors differ clinically from hypophysitis. Yang L, Zhang Y, Chen X, Liu K, Zhou Y, Wang S. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2024;101:130–139. doi: 10.1111/cen.15075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Development of pituitary dysfunction and destructive thyroiditis is associated with better survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with programmed cell death-1 inhibitors: A prospective study with immortal time bias correction. Suzuki K, Kobayashi T, Izuchi T, et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024;15:1490042. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1490042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging features between programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor-induced hypopituitarism and idiopathic hypopituitarism in Japanese subjects. Iwamoto Y, Kimura T, Dan K, et al. Cureus. 2024;16:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pituitary dysfunction: A case series of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hypophysitis in an emergency department. Miller AH, Brock P, Jim Yeung SC. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;68:249–250. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.03.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hypophysitis secondary to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 blockade: Insights into pathogenesis from an autopsy series. Caturegli P, Di Dalmazi G, Lombardi M, et al. Am J Pathol. 2016;186:3225–3235. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Adrenal insufficiency related to anti-programmed death-1 therapy. Ariyasu R, Horiike A, Yoshizawa T, et al. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:4229–4232. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hypophysitis and other autoimmune complications related to immune checkpoints inhibitors´ treatment: Spectrum of imaging appearances. Malikova H, Holesta M, Fialova A, Arenbergerova M, Weichet J. http://chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.nel.edu/userfiles/articlesnew/1545601520_39_3_malikova_196-pdf.pdf. Neur Endocrinol Lett. 2018;39:196–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hypophysitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: A 10-year assessment. Di Dalmazi G, Ippolito S, Lupi I, Caturegli P. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2019;14:381–398. doi: 10.1080/17446651.2019.1701434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated hypophysitis-World Health Organisation VigiBase report analysis. Guerrero E, Johnson DB, Bachelot A, Lebrun-Vignes B, Moslehi JJ, Salem JE. Eur J Cancer. 2019;113:10–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Immune check point inhibitors-induced hypophysitis: A retrospective analysis of the French Pharmacovigilance database. Garon-Czmil J, Petitpain N, Rouby F, et al. Sci Rep. 2019;9:19419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56026-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Machine learning defined diagnostic criteria for differentiating pituitary metastasis from autoimmune hypophysitis in patients undergoing immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Mekki A, Dercle L, Lichtenstein P, et al. Eur J Cancer. 2019;119:44–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hypophysitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors in a Scottish melanoma population. Wei KZ, Baxter M, Casasola R. Melanoma Manag. 2019;6:0. doi: 10.2217/mmt-2018-0009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.A common pituitary autoantibody in two patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated hypophysitis: ZCCHC8. Leiter A, Gnjatic S, Fowkes M, Kim-Schulze S, Laface I, Galsky MD, Gallagher EJ. AACE Clin Case Rep. 2020;6:0–60. doi: 10.4158/ACCR-2019-0585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Predicting development of ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis: Utility of T4 and TSH index but not TSH. Siddiqui MS, Lai ZM, Spain L, Greener V, Turajlic S, Larkin J, Morganstein DL. J Endocrinol Invest. 2021;44:195–203. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01297-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pituitary adverse events: An observational, retrospective, disproportionality study. Bai X, Chen X, Wu X, et al. J Endocrinol Invest. 2020;43:1473–1483. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01226-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pituitary dysfunction induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with better overall survival in both malignant melanoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma: A prospective study. Kobayashi T, Iwama S, Yasuda Y, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:0. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Human leucocyte antigen DR15, a possible predictive marker for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced secondary adrenal insufficiency. Yano S, Ashida K, Sakamoto R, et al. Eur J Cancer. 2020;130:198–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.MRI findings of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hypophysitis: Possible association with fibrosis. Kurokawa R, Ota Y, Gonoi W, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41:1683–1689. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Characterisation of the onset and severity of adrenal and thyroid dysfunction associated with CTLA4-related hypophysitis. Seejore K, Giannoudi M, Osborn D, et al. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;186:83–93. doi: 10.1530/EJE-21-0760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hypophysitis: Lessons learnt from a large cancer cohort. Kotwal A, Rouleau SG, Dasari S, et al. J Investig Med. 2022;70:939–946. doi: 10.1136/jim-2021-002099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mechanistic insights into immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hypophysitis: A form of paraneoplastic syndrome. Kanie K, Iguchi G, Bando H, et al. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021;70:3669–3677. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-02955-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Differences between immunotherapy-induced and primary hypophysitis—a multicenter retrospective study. Amereller F, Deutschbein T, Joshi M, et al. Pituitary. 2022;25:152–158. doi: 10.1007/s11102-021-01182-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Isolated ACTH deficiency induced by cancer immunotherapy: A systematic review. Iglesias P, Sánchez JC, Díez JJ. Pituitary. 2021;24:630–643. doi: 10.1007/s11102-021-01141-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Immunotherapy-induced isolated ACTH deficiency in cancer therapy. Iglesias P, Peiró I, Biagetti B, et al. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2021;28:783–792. doi: 10.1530/ERC-21-0228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hypopituitarism in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy. Takagi T, Yoshida K, Kondo T, et al. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021;51:1744–1750. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyab141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Immune checkpoint inhibitor related hypophysitis: Diagnostic criteria and recovery patterns. Nguyen H, Shah K, Waguespack SG, et al. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2021;28:419–431. doi: 10.1530/ERC-20-0513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Anti-pituitary antibodies and susceptible human leukocyte antigen alleles as predictive biomarkers for pituitary dysfunction induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Kobayashi T, Iwama S, Sugiyama D, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:0. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Eosinophil counts can be a predictive marker of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced secondary adrenal insufficiency: A retrospective cohort study. Takayasu S, Mizushiri S, Watanuki Y, et al. Sci Rep. 2022;12:1294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05400-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Routine screening for central and primary adrenal insufficiency during immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy: An endocrinology perspective for oncologists. Druce I, Tawagi K, Shaw JL, Ibrahim A, Lochnan H, Ong M. Curr Oncol. 2022;29:4665–4677. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29070370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hypophysitis and patterns of loss of pituitary function. Jessel S, Weiss SA, Austin M, et al. Front Oncol. 2022;12:836859. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.836859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated new-onset primary adrenal insufficiency: A retrospective analysis using the FAERS. Lu D, Yao J, Yuan G, Gao Y, Zhang J, Guo X. J Endocrinol Invest. 2022;45:2131–2137. doi: 10.1007/s40618-022-01845-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Immune checkpoint inhibitors as a threat to the hypothalamus-pituitary axis: A completed puzzle. Barnabei A, Corsello A, Paragliola RM, Iannantuono GM, Falzone L, Corsello SM, Torino F. Cancers. 2022;14:1057. doi: 10.3390/cancers14041057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced central diabetes insipidus: Looking for the needle in the haystack or a very rare side-effect to promptly diagnose? Barnabei A, Strigari L, Corsello A, et al. Front Oncol. 2022;12:798517. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.798517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hypereosinophilia is a predictive biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hypopituitarism in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Yamada H, Washino S, Suzuki D, et al. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22:110. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01024-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.HLA analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced and idiopathic isolated ACTH deficiency. Ono M, Fukuda I, Nagao M, et al. Pituitary. 2022;25:615–621. doi: 10.1007/s11102-022-01231-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Spectrum of clinical presentations, imaging findings, and HLA types in immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hypophysitis. Quandt Z, Kim S, Villanueva-Meyer J, et al. J Endocr Soc. 2023;7:0. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated hypophysitis: No place like home. Cooksley T, Knight T, Lindsay D, et al. Clin Med (Lond) 2023;23:81–84. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hypophysitis and secondary adrenal insufficiency from immune checkpoint inhibitors: Diagnostic challenges and link with survival. Johnson J, Goldner W, Abdallah D, Qiu F, Ganti AK, Kotwal A. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21:281–287. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pituitary enlargement and hypopituitarism in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Two sides of the same coin? Chiloiro S, Giampietro A, Bianchi A, et al. J Pers Med. 2023;13:415. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Exploring a rarity: Incidence of and therapeutic approaches for neurological complications and hypophysitis in cancer patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors—A single-center study. Amylidi AL, Gogadis A, Yerolatsite M, et al. Curr Oncol. 2023;30:10509–10518. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Isolated autoimmune adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency: A positive predictor of survival among cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Aviv-Shimoni S, Uri I, Milloh-Raz H, Percik R. Autoimmun Rev. 2023;22:103387. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Imaging for assessment of cancer treatment response to immune checkpoint inhibitors can be complementary in identifying hypophysitis. Galligan A, Iravani A, Lasocki A, et al. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1295865. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1295865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Clinical characteristics and human leukocyte antigens in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes and pituitary dysfunction: A single center prospective study. Hara N, Suwanai H, Yakou F, et al. Endocrine. 2023;81:477–483. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03394-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.18 F-FDG PET/CT for detection of immunotherapy-induced hypophysitis—A case-control study. Fischer A, Martínez-Gómez JM, Mangana J, et al. Clin Nucl Med. 2024;49:0–63. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Combined PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade increases the risks of multiple pituitary hormone deficiency and isolated adrenocorticotropic deficiency: A prospective study. Iwama S, Kobayashi T, Izuchi T, et al. Endocrinol Metab. 2025;40:459–468. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2024.2180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Immune checkpoint inhibitor induced hypophysitis: A specific disease of corticotrophs? Patel N, Hirwa K, Gardner G, Pearce K, Jeffery J, Iqbal F, Flanagan D. Endocr Connect. 2024;13 doi: 10.1530/EC-24-0223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Early serum markers for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced hypophysitis in melanoma patients. Mitri F, Machiraju D, Naoum C, Hassel JC. Cancers. 2024;16:1340. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Differences in checkpoint-inhibitor-induced hypophysitis: Mono- versus combination therapy induced hypophysitis. van der Leij S, Suijkerbuijk KP, van den Broek MF, Valk GD, Dankbaar JW, van Santen HM. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024;15:1400841. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1400841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Patterns of hormonal changes in hypophysitis by immune checkpoint inhibitor. Sang H, Cho YK, Go SH, Kim HJ, Koh EH. Korean J Intern Med. 2024;39:801–812. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency: A systematic review. Wang F, Shi X, Yu X, Yang Y. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024;15:1326684. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1326684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Fluctuations in plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone concentration may predict the onset of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hypophysitis. Bando H, Yamamoto M, Urai S, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2024;12:0. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.High-dose glucocorticoid treatment vs. glucocorticoid replacement in immune checkpoint inhibitor associated hypophysitis (CORTICI): an open, randomised controlled trial. Theiler-Schwetz V, Trummer C, Schmitt L, Terbuch A, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Richtig E, Pilz S. Ann Med. 2025;57:2453829. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2453829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.The association of hypophysitis with immune checkpoint inhibitors use: Gaining insight through the FDA pharmacovigilance database. Tang Q, Han Y, Song M, Peng J, Zhang M, Ren X, Sun H. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024;103:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.The utility of magnetic resonance imaging for hypophysitis secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitor use. Qi QY, Vettivel J, Solanki K, Davis A, Russell AW, Bach LA. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2025;102:699–705. doi: 10.1111/cen.15240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Two cases of atezolizumab-induced hypophysitis. Kanie K, Iguchi G, Bando H, et al. J Endocr Soc. 2018;2:91–95. doi: 10.1210/js.2017-00414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Anti-PD-L1 therapy-associated hypophysitis and limbic encephalitis. Matthys A, Demeret S, Leclercq D, Di Meglio L. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48:1807–1808. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06911-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Durvalumab-associated hypopituitarism. Ogbue O, Garisa M, Furqan M, Alqaisi S, Patel R. Am J Ther. 2023;30:0–6. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Three cases of immune-related hypopituitarism after atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Furuichi N, Naganuma A, Kaburagi T, et al. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2023;16:422–431. doi: 10.1007/s12328-023-01775-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Iatrogenic pituitary shutdown: A rare adverse event of programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitor. Al-Hiari M, Workman A, Ezeh E, Teka S. JCEM Case Rep. 2024;2:0. doi: 10.1210/jcemcr/luad157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Diagnostic criteria and proposed management of immune-related endocrinopathies following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer. Percik R, Criseno S, Adam S, Young K, Morganstein DL. Endocr Connect. 2023;12 doi: 10.1530/EC-22-0513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hypophysitis: An update on the novel forms, diagnosis and management of disorders of pituitary inflammation. Gubbi S, Hannah-Shmouni F, Verbalis JG, Koch CA. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;33:101371. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2019.101371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Endocrinopathies associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor use. Kotwal A, Kennedy R, Kikani N, Thosani S, Goldner W, Shariff A. Endocr Pract. 2024;30:584–591. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES