Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Jan 7;21(1):e0337346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337346

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from human carriage, the human-polluted environment, and food: Molecular epidemiology of two prospective cohorts in five European metropolitan areas

Tess D Verschuuren 1,2,*, Julia Guther 3, Maria Eugenia Riccio 4, Daniel Martak 5,6, Elena Salamanca 7,8,9, Siri Göpel 10, Nadine Conzelmann 10, Jelle Scharringa 11, Patrick Musicha 12, Ingo B Autenrieth 13, Ben S Cooper 12, Didier Hocquet 5,6, Evelina Tacconelli 8,14, Jesús Rodríguez-Baño 7,8,9, Stephan Harbarth 4, Ad C Fluit 11, Silke Peter 3, Jan A J W Kluytmans 2,11
Editor: Gabriel Trueba15
PMCID: PMC12779062  PMID: 41499459

Abstract

Objectives

For 475 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec), and 171 ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-Kp) collected from human carriers, the human-polluted (hp)-environment, and food: (i) to compare the antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) content, and (ii) to assess clonal relationships between human and non-human isolates.

Materials and methods

Two prospective multicenter cohorts were assessed: colonized hospitalized index-subjects and household contacts, and long-term care facility (LTCF) residents. Additionally, linked hp-environment and food samples were collected. Presence of ARGs were assessed using pairwise comparisons and proportional similarity index (PSI). Clonal relationships were assessed using cgMLST distance visualizations and maximum likelihood phylogeny.

Results

ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp co-occurred in 14/65 households, 3/6 LTCFs, and in 33/202 of ESBL-positive participants. Thirty-nine percent of detected ARG types were found in both species (36/93). Frequencies of beta-lactamase, ESBL, aminoglycoside, and sulfonamide ARG types from human ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp overlapped considerably: PSIs 0.59–0.75, and were equal or higher compared to the overlap between ESBL-Ec from humans and food isolates: PSIs 0.33–0.72. Isolates from humans and the hp-environment were frequently clonally related, indicating human contamination of the environment. Links with food isolates were observed less frequently. For ESBL-Ec both interregional and regional clonal dissemination were observed, while for ESBL-Kp clonal dissemination was mainly regional.

Conclusions

ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp from human carriage showed considerable overlap in ARG content. Furthermore, clonal links were observed frequently between humans and hp-environment, and with lower frequency between humans and food. These findings are consistent with human-to-human transmission as an important driver of ARG spread in humans.

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance was declared as one of the top 10 public health threats facing humanity by the World Health Organization in 2019 [1]. In Europe, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-Kp) are of particular concern, as these species are the most frequent causative agents of infections with antimicrobial resistant pathogens [2]. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that intestinal carriage of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales will result in infection in 8% of carriers [3]. Scientific effort has been put into elucidating reservoirs of human carriage for these bacteria, but the data on the relevance of sources outside humans are conflicting [47]. Most antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) that have been observed in E. coli also occur in K. pneumoniae, and vice versa, which is indicative of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) [4,6,8,9]. However, ARG types have rarely been compared systematically between multidrug-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae [1014]. Five studies have been performed in a retrospective way and were mostly single-center (n = 3), with relatively small sample sizes (n = 71–150) [1014]. Here, we statistically compare the ARG types occurring in ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp from human carriers with a close relationship to healthcare, the human-polluted (hp)-environment, and food. Additionally, we assess clonal relationships between human and non-human isolates.

Materials and methods

Study design, and data-collection

Two prospective cohort studies were conducted between November 1st 2017 and August 31st 2019 in five European metropolitan areas: Besançon (France), Geneva (Switzerland), Seville (Spain), Tübingen (Germany), and Utrecht (the Netherlands). Data collection, sample processing, and microbiological methods have been described previously [7,15,16]. Briefly, the household study recruited ESBL-Ec- and ESBL-Kp-positive index patients during hospitalization. Participants were followed up at home for four months after discharge, together with ≥1 other household member, and provided a fecal sample at four time points during follow-up. In the long-term care facility (LTCF) study, participating residents were followed for eight months, and provided a fecal sample or perianal swab at eight time points during follow-up (S1, p1-2). Additionally, food and hp-environment samples were collected: (i) food was sampled at three time points in supermarkets where participating households reported shopping, and eight times in the kitchen of the participating LTCFs, (ii) samples from the hp-environment were collected from: a) LTCF U-bends, b) LTCF surfaces, c) LTCF wastewater, d) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) inflow connected to the LTCF, and e) river downstream to the WWTP. Reservoirs a) and b) were sampled twice, the other reservoirs eight times (S1, p1-2).

Ethics

The institutional review board of the university hospitals of Besançon, Geneva, Seville, Tübingen, and Utrecht reviewed, and approved the studies or waived the need for further ethical review. In Geneva only the household cohort study was conducted, and thus reviewed. All enrolled participants or their legal representatives provided written informed consent for participation in this study.

Microbiological methods

The microbiology laboratory of each participating center used selective culture media, and selective enrichment broth with standardized methods for the collected human, environmental surface, wastewater, and food samples. Subsequently, identification of ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp was performed (S1, p3).

Sequencing and selection of unique isolates

Isolates identified as ESBL-Ec or ESBL-Kp were shipped to Tübingen or Utrecht. DNA isolation (DNeasy UltraClean Microbial Kit, Qiagen), sequencing (NextSeq and MiSeq platforms, Illumina, San Diego, USA), and de novo assembly (Spades v3.11.1) was performed on all isolates. Quality of assembled sequences was assessed (S1, p3). In this study, only unique isolates were included (S1, p3).

In silico molecular typing

ARGs conferring resistance to clinically relevant antimicrobials were identified using ResFinder (v3.2) (S1, p3) [17]. These included ARGs conferring resistance to: (i) penicillins only (small- or broad-spectrum), from here on referred to as beta-lactams, (ii) penicillins and cephalosporins, from here referred to as ESBLs, (iii) penicillins and carbapenems, referred to as carbapenemases, (iv) fluoroquinolones, (v) aminoglycosides, (vi) fosfomycin, (vii) trimethoprim, (viii) sulfonamides, and lastly (ix) colistin. Classifications were made according to genotype-phenotype (antimicrobial and class) translations available in the ResFinder database (https://bitbucket.org/genomicepidemiology/resfinder_db/src/master/phenotypes.txt) and EUCAST Clinical Breakpoint Tables (v13.0) to further subgroup the ‘β-lactam’ class provided by ResFinder [18,19]. A list of all detected ARG types with classifications is included in the supplement (S1, p4). Sequence types (STs) were identified using published tools, and sub-clades were assigned to ST131 (ESBL-Ec) isolates (S1, p3) [20,21].

Analysis

The proportions of the 10 most frequently occurring ARG types per class were compared using a two-proportion z-test. The pairwise overlap between sampled reservoirs of acquired ARG type distributions was quantified with Czekanowski’s proportional similarity index [4].

PSI=1  0.5 k|p(reservoir[n])kq(reservoir[nx])k|

Where p corresponded to the relative frequency of gene type k in reservoir n, and q corresponded to the relative frequency of the same gene type in reservoir nx [4,22]. The denominator of the relative frequency was the total number of genes in the corresponding ARG class. The PSI is a proportion, with 0 being interpreted as no overlap, and 1 as perfect overlap in ARG type distributions between two reservoirs. Bootstrap iterations (5,000) were used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (boot R-package, v1.3.23) [4]. Clonal transmission between humans was described previously [15]. Here, we assessed clonal relationships between human and non-human isolates, with a visualization where isolates were ordered based on epidemiological setting (qgraph R-package, v1.9.4). To prevent detection of spurious relationships between human and non-human isolates, a cgMLST threshold was chosen for ESBL-Ec of ≤0.0040 (~10 alleles) for definition of clonally related pairs, based on previous studies [7,22]. The threshold for ESBL-Kp was set at ≤0.0035 (~10 alleles) [22,23]. A sensitivity analysis with increased thresholds was performed. Lastly, maximum likelihood (ML) trees were created for ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp (S1, p5).

Results

In total, 196 participants were included (110 household members, and 86 LTCF residents), carrying 205 ESBL-Ec, and 101 ESBL-Kp isolates (Table 1). Furthermore, 232 hp-environment and 108 food isolates were included, consisting of 270 ESBL-Ec, and 70 ESBL-Kp isolates (Table 1). A list of all included strains is provided in the supplement (S2). During follow-up, both species were detected in human samples from 14/65 (22%) households, and 3/6 LTCFs, and 17% of participants were colonized with both ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp. A mean of 1.6 isolates (range: 1–10) were detected in participants during follow-up (Table 1). On average, participants from Utrecht were colonized with 1.1 unique isolates, while participants from Seville were colonized with 1.7 unique isolates (p < 0.0001), mostly due to more frequent carriage of ESBL-Kp isolates.

Table 1. Characteristics of the included first unique ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from humans, the human-polluted environment, and food.

ESBL+ ESBL-Ec ESBL-Kp
ESBL-positive participantsa (n) 196 151 78
 household members 110 82 41
 LTCF-residents 86 69 37
Number of unique isolates per participant (mean; range) 1.6 (1-10) 1.1 (0-7) 0.52 (0-3)
 household membersb 1.4 (1-10) 1.0 (0-7) 0.43 (0-3)
 LTCF residentsc 1.7 (1-5) 1.1 (0-5) 0.60 (0-3)
Unique isolates (n) 646 475 171
 human 306 205 101
 human-polluted environment 232 175 57
 food 108 95 13
Composition human-polluted environment (n)
 LTCF surface 15 7 8
 LTCF U-bend 26 13 13
 LTCF wastewater outflow 34 19 15d
 wastewater treatment plant inflow 73 64 9
 downstream river 84 72 12

an: number of participants carrying ESBL-E. coli or ESBL-K. pneumoniae on at least one time-point. bThe maximum follow-up of a household member was four months. cThe maximum follow-up of LTCF residents was eight months. dseven isolates were retrospectively identified as Klebsiella variicola.

Comparison of ARG content

Of a total of 93 detected ARG types, 39% (n = 36) were detected in both species, demonstrating overlap of resistance genes from all classes, except carbapenems and colistin (Table 2). ARGs encoding for carbapenemases (ESBL-Ec (n = 2): blaOXA-48, blaOXA-181, ESBL-Kp: blaKPC-2 (n = 2)) and colistin-resistance (ESBL-Kp: mcr-1 (n = 1)) were rare. When assessing the 10 most frequently occurring ARG types per class, we observed similar frequencies for ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp from human isolates. However, overall proportions of ARGs were higher for ESBL-Kp (Fig 1 and S1, p7). For example, compared to ESBL-Ec, ESBL-Kp were more likely to harbor ARGs from the blaSHV family (77% vs 12%), resistance genes aac(6’)-Ib-cr (51% vs 14%), aac(3)-IIa (45% vs 8%), and blaOXA-1 (50% vs 15%), and fosA genes (75% vs 1%) (Fig 1 and S1, p7). When assessing the sampled reservoirs separately, ESBL-Ec from food showed differences in detected ARG types compared to other groups. For example, ESBL-Ec from food harbored less blaOXA-1 (2% vs 28%), blaCTX-M-15 (12% vs 59%), aac(6’)-Ib-cr (2% vs 27%), aac(3)-IIa (2% vs 21%), and more blaSHV-12 (39% vs 6%), blaCTX-M-1 (32% vs 5%), ant(3”)-Ia (38% vs 9%), and sul3 (26% vs 3%) compared to the cumulative frequencies in other groups (Fig 1 and S1, p7).

Table 2. Detected antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) types grouped per antimicrobial class of conferred resistance.

ESBL-Ec ESBL-Kp Both species
Antimicrobial class ARG type ARG type ARG type
beta-lactamsa blaCARB-2, blaDHA-1, blaOXA-1, blaOXA-2, blaTEM-1, blaTEM-122, blaTEM-2, blaTEM210, blaTEM-33 blaDHA-1, blaLEN-24, blaOKP-A-12, blaOKPA3, blaOKP-B-1, blaOKP-B-15, blaOKP-B-3, blaOKP-B-9, blaOXA-1, blaSCO-1, blaSHV-1, blaSHV-11, blaSHV-110, blaSHV145, blaSHV-172, blaSHV-178, blaSHV-187, blaSHV-27, blaSHV-62, blaSHV75, blaSHV-76, blaTEM-1 blaDHA-1, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1
ESBLs blaCTX-M-1, blaCTX-M-14, blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-27, blaCTX-M-3, blaCTX-M-32, blaCTX-M-55, blaCTX-M-65, blaCTX-M-8, blaSHV-12, blaSHV-2, blaTEM-106, blaTEM-52 blaCTX-M-1, blaCTX-M-14, blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-209, blaCTX-M-27, blaCTX-M-3, blaCTX-M-9, blaSHV-106, blaSHV-12, blaSHV129, blaSHV-13, blaSHV-2, blaSHV-5, blaTEM-169 blaCTX-M-1, blaCTX-M-14, blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-27, blaCTX-M-3, blaSHV-12, blaSHV-2
carbapenems blaOXA-181, blaOXA-48 blaKPC-2
fluoroquinolones aac(6’)-Ib-cr, qepA4, qnrB1, qnrB19, qnrB4, qnrS1, qnrS2 aac(6’)-Ib-cr, qnrA1, qnrB1, qnrB19, qnrB4, qnrB52, qnrS1, qnrS2 aac(6’)-Ib-cr, qnrB1, qnrB19, qnrB4, qnrS1, qnrS2
aminoglycosides aac(3)-IIa, aac(3)-IId, aac(3)-IVa, aac(3)-VIa, aac(6’)-Ib-cr, aadA1, aadA2, aadA5, ant(2’‘)-Ia, ant(3’‘)Ia, aph(3’)-Ia, aph(3’‘)-Ib, aph(3’)-Id, aph(4)-Ia, aph(6)-Id aac(3)-IIa, aac(3)-IId, aac(6’)-Ib-cr, aadA1, aadA16, aadA2, aadA4, aadA5, ant(2’‘)-Ia, ant(3’‘)-Ia, aph(3’)-Ia, aph(3’‘)-Ib, aph(6)-Id aac(3)-IIa, aac(3)-Iid, aac(6’)-Ib-cr, aadA1, aadA2, aadA5, ant(2’‘)-Ia, ant(3’‘)-Ia, aph(3’)-Ia, aph(3’‘)-Ib, aph(6)-Id
fosfomycin fosA, fosA3 fosA, fosA6, fosA5 fosA
trimethoprim dfrA1, dfrA12, dfrA14, dfrA16, dfrA17, dfrA5, dfrA7, dfrA8 dfrA1, dfrA12, dfrA14, dfrA15, dfrA16, dfrA17, dfrA27 dfrA1, dfrA12, dfrA14, dfrA16, dfrA17
sulfonamides sul1, sul2, sul3 sul1, sul2, sul3 sul1, sul2, sul3
colistin mcr-1

aIncludes antimicrobial resistance genes conferring resistance to small or broad-spectrum penicillins, excluding ESBLs and carbapenemases.

Fig 1. Proportions (95% CI) of the ten most frequent antimicrobial resistance gene types per isolate.

Fig 1

Panel (a) beta-lactamases, panel (b) ESBLs, panel (c) fluoroquinolones, panel (d) aminoglycosides.

The PSI was calculated in order to quantify the total overlap of observed ARG types (grouped per antimicrobial class) between the sampled reservoirs. Overall, the ARG types from the same species observed in human and human-polluted environment isolates were most similar, ranging between 0.76 (95% CI 0.7–0.8) for beta-lactams from ESBL-Kp to 0.94 (0.9–1.0) for fosfomycin from ESBL-Ec (Fig 2 and S1, p8). However, ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp from humans also showed considerable similarity in beta-lactams (PSI 0.63; 0.5–0.7), ESBLs (PSI 0.59; 0.5–0.7), aminoglycosides (PSI 0.68; 0.6–0.7), and sulfonamides (PSI 0.75; 0.6–0.9) ARG types. In fact, for these ARGs, PSIs were equal or higher to PSIs from humans and food harboring ESBL-Ec. Lastly, less overlap was observed between ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp from humans for fluoroquinolone (PSI 0.37; 0.3–0.5), fosfomycin (PSI 0.24; 0.1–0.3), and trimethoprim (PSI 0.36; 0.3–0.5) ARG types (Fig 2 and S1, p8).

Fig 2. Czekanowski’s proportional similarity index (PSI) (95% confidence interval) of detected antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) types.

Fig 2

Panel (a) beta-lactamases conferring resistance to penicillins only (small and broad spectrum), panel (b) ESBL, panel (c) fluoroquinolones, and panel (d) aminoglycosides. The PSI is calculated with the following formula: 1 0.5 k|p(reservoir[n])kq(reservoir[nx])k| where p corresponded to the relative frequency of gene type k (e.g. blaCTX-M-15) in reservoir n (e.g., ESBL-E. coli from humans), and q corresponded to the relative frequency of the same gene type in reservoir nx (e.g., ESBL-K. pneumoniae from humans). The numerator of the relative frequency was the count of each ARG type. The denominator of the relative frequency was the total number of genes of the corresponding ARG class. The PSI is a proportion, with 0 interpreted as no overlap, and 1 as perfect overlap in ARG type distributions between two reservoirs. 95% confidence intervals were calculated with 5,000 bootstrap iterations. PSI analysis for fosfomycin, trimethoprim, and sulfonamides ARGs are described in the supplement (S1 Fig 4 in S1 Appendix).

Comparison of core genome content of isolates from humans, the hp-environment, and food

The three most frequent STs within ESBL-Ec were: ST131 (28%; 44% in human isolates, 23% hp-environment, 0% food), ST10 (11%; 10% human, 10% hp-environment, 12% food), ST69 (5.1%; 2.8% human, 5.1% hp-environment, 9.5% food). For ESBL-Kp, the three most frequent STs were ST405 (22%; 27% in human isolates, 18% hp-environment, 0% food), ST307 (10%; 10% human, 12% hp-environment, 0% food), ST323 (5.8%; 3.0% human, 12% hp-environment, 0% food). During follow-up, eight participants were colonized with >1 ST131 isolate, often harboring different ESBL genes (S1, p6).

A pattern of clonally related isolates between humans and the hp-environment was observed (Fig 3a-b). This observation was most pronounced in Seville for both ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp, where isolates from residents were regularly related to LTCF surfaces, U-bends, and LTCF wastewater outflow (Fig 3c-d). These connections reflected spread from LTCF residents to the LTCF-associated environments, and potentially human acquisition through contaminated surfaces (and U-bends). Furthermore, similar patterns were observed for ESBL-Ec isolates from Besançon, Tübingen, and Geneva (Fig 3a, and S1, p9). Observed clonally related isolates from humans and WWTP inflow or downstream rivers likely reflected spread of certain genetically conserved strains in a larger geographical area. Lastly, we found two clonally related human-food pairs for ESBL-Ec, both without a known epidemiological link (Fig 3a).

Fig 3. Visualization of clonally related isolate pairs.

Fig 3

Nodes represent isolates and are grouped based on epidemiological setting, lines represent genetically similar isolate pairs. Panel (a) ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-Ec), panel (b) ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (including seven K. variicola isolates) (ESBL-Kp), panel (c) ESBL-Ec Seville, panel (d) ESBL-Kp Seville. Grey boxes I and II are displayed enlarged in S1 Fig 5 in S1 Appendix, I: Panel A, II panel B.

The ML-tree of ESBL-Ec showed no evident clustering based on sample group, with the exception of the absence of food isolates within the ST131 and ST1193 phylogeny (Fig 4a). Both STs were retrieved in all cities, potentially indicating clonal human-to-human spread in a large geographic area. For ST131, clade A (24/138), B (5/138), and C (108/138) clustered separately, and most of these isolates carried the blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-27, or blaCTX-M-14 blaESBL (Fig 4a). Clade C1 and C2 were distributed evenly with 51 and 57 isolates, respectively. Most of C1 isolates carried blaCTX-M-27 (n = 40). For ESBL-Kp, most STs were specific to a metropolitan area, likely reflecting local clonal dissemination (Fig 4b). However, ST405 and ST323 were observed in two countries, and ST219 (n = 6) was observed in four countries from human, river, and chicken and turkey isolates, potentially reflecting widespread clonal dissemination. The few food-related isolates (n = 13) were scattered throughout the tree (Fig 4b).

Fig 4. Maximum likelihood core genome phylogenies.

Fig 4

Panel (a) ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-Ec) (n = 475 isolates), panel (b) ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (ESBL-Kp) (n = 171 isolates, including seven K. variicola isolates). Online access interactive trees: ESBL-Ec: https://microreact.org/project/wSXSAfjgAH1Xr9af46Hbcb-modern-project-esbl-e-coli-n475.

ESBL-Kp: https://microreact.org/project/vRJHCdos8zWcv4yHMTKjak-modern-project-esbl-k-pneumoniae.

Discussion

In this multicentre prospective study, ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp regularly co-occurred in humans who, by the design of this study, were in close contact with healthcare. The majority of blaESBL types were found in both species. blaESBL distributions of ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp sampled from humans were more similar than ESBL-Ec sampled from humans and food. Non-ESBL-ARGs occurrence was highest in ESBL-Kp from any source and lowest in ESBL-Ec from food. While ESBL-Kp did more often carry ARGs, substantial overlap was observed for ARGs encoding resistance to beta-lactams, and aminoglycosides between ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp from humans.

A relatively low similarity in blaESBL type distributions was observed between ESBL-Ec from food and humans, which was mainly explained by a lower occurrence of blaCTX-M-15, and higher occurrence of blaCTX-M-1 and blaSHV-12 in food [4]. Furthermore, ST131, the most prevalent ST in the dataset, was absent in food, and ARG proportions were lowest in food-related ESBL-Ec. Early research showed potential links between ESBL-Ec from food and humans [5]. However, more recent studies found that, at least in high income countries, ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp mainly spread through human-to-human transmission, while transmission of ESBL-Ec from food is less frequently observed and does probably not play an important role for ST131 the most frequently observed ST in humans. The role of food can be considered as spill-over events (potentially introducing new resistance traits into humans which may subsequently spread) [4,6,23].

The blaCTX-M-15 gene has been widely observed as the most frequently occurring blaESBL in both E. coli and K. pneumoniae from human carriage and infection [4,6,20]. In this study, the majority of the detected blaESBL types occurred in both species, with blaCTX-M-15 detected in more than half of the included isolates. Furthermore, we observed considerable similarity in ARG content encoding resistance to beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and sulfonamides. These observations are supported by studies that statistically compared ARG content between E. coli and K. pneumoniae, demonstrating overlap in ARGs conferring resistance to several antimicrobial classes [1014].

Hospital and LTCF environments are well-established as significant reservoirs and amplifiers of multi-drug resistant bacteria, contributing to the persistence and spread of these organisms within healthcare settings and the broader community [16,24,25]. To our knowledge this is the first study to genetically compare ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp that were prospectively and longitudinally sampled from humans, the hp-environment, and food in five European metropolitan areas. Due to the sampling strategy, we were able to give unique insight in the co-occurrence of these species. Furthermore, the availability of short read sequences of all isolates enabled us to compare the assessed reservoirs on several genetic levels.

Several limitations must be acknowledged. Firstly, horizontal gene transfer of ARGs could not be assessed due to limitations of short-read sequencing technology in reconstructing mobile genetic elements such as plasmids [26]. Ongoing MODERN studies using previously completed nanopore sequencing aim to address plasmid characterization, overcoming any issues with repetitive sequence elements. Secondly, sample size and sampling strategies hampered comparisons between species and reservoirs. Fewer ESBL-Kp isolates were collected than ESBL-Ec, largely due to a lower prevalence, especially in food. Additionally, while LTCF food items came directly from participating LCTFs, household food items were sampled from nearby supermarkets. A higher similarity between human carriage and food may have been observed if the food items came directly from participating households. As a result, this study could not reliably determine the exact relation between contamination of specific food items and ESBL carriage in participating individuals. Thirdly, two different cgMLST thresholds were used: one to select unique intra-individual isolates, and one to determine clonal transmission between humans and non-human groups. Using a single threshold would have either overestimated the number of unique intra-individual isolates, or the clonal relationships between humans and non-human groups. The optimal threshold for the sampled groups likely varies across settings and remains unknown. Finally, the generalizability of the results to community dwellers is likely limited, due to the included health-care associated study population, where a higher ESBL prevalence, and thus clonal and horizontal transmission, may have led to overestimation of ARG similarity between ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp in humans.

Our data suggest the importance of public health interventions on prevention of human-to-human clonal and horizontal transmission through (i) implementation of adequate infection prevention in healthcare centers like LTCFs, and (ii) development of hygienic advice for households of colonized patients discharged from hospitals. Future research should elucidate to which extent, and under which circumstances, members of the Enterobacterales family share ARGs through HGT, and how this contributes to endemicity of ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp.

In conclusion, ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp regularly co-occurred in human populations with a close relationship with healthcare throughout Europe. Considerable overlap in ARG content was observed between ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp. Furthermore, clonal links were frequently observed between humans and the human-polluted environment, and at a lower frequency between humans and food. These findings are consistent with human-to-human transmission as an important driver of the dissemination of ARGs in humans.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Supplementary appendix.

(DOCX)

pone.0337346.s001.docx (7.1MB, docx)
S1 Table. Strainfile.

Contains data of all included strains in this study.

(XLSX)

pone.0337346.s002.xlsx (144.8KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff and residents from the LTCFs of Bellevaux in Besançon – France; Ferrusola and El Recreo in Seville – Spain; Luise-Wetzel-Stift and Samariterstift in Tübingen, Germany; and Altenahove in Almkerk – The Netherlands for their involvement in the study. We would like to thank Mercedes Delgado from Seville – Spain; Caroline Brossier from Geneva – Switzerland, for assistance in collecting and processing the samples. We would like to thank Judith Vlooswijk, and Heike Schmitt from Utrecht – the Netherlands; Marion Broussier, Jeanne Celotto, and Alexandre Meunier from Besançon – France; John Poté, Gesuele Renzi, Abdessalam Cherkaoui, and Siva Lingam from Geneva, Switzerland; Michael Eib from Tübingen – Germany for their help on microbiological analyses of the samples, Elisabeth Stoll and Steffen Ganß from Tübingen – Germany for collecting the samples. We thank the Institut Pasteur teams for the curation and maintenance of BIGSdb-Pasteur databases at http://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/. We thank the Enterobase team for the curation and maintenance of Enterobase Escherichia coli MLST database at https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk. We thank the academic editors and reviewers, for providing commentary and constructive feedback.

Data Availability

Raw reads are available on the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA), under the accession number PRJEB50545. Metadata with accession numbers are available in the supplementary material. Online access interactive maximum-likelihood trees: ESBL-Ec: https://microreact.org/project/wSXSAfjgAH1Xr9af46Hbcb-modern-project-esbl-e-coli-n475, ESBL-Kp: https://microreact.org/project/vRJHCdos8zWcv4yHMTKjak-modern-project-esbl-k-pneumoniae.

Funding Statement

“The MODERN studies (Understanding and modelling reservoirs, vehicles and transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community and long term care facilities) were funded under the Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance 2016 Joint Call. Funding was provided by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (grant nos. 681055 and 547001004 to T.D.V., J.S., A.C.F., J.A.J.W.K.); the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 40AR40-173608 to M.E.R., S.H.); the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01KI1701 to J.G., S.G., N.C., I.B.A., E.T., S.P.); the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-16-JPEC-0007-03 to D.M., D.H.); the UK Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/R004536/1 to P.M., B.S.C.); and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant no. AC16/00076 to E.S., J.R.B.). E.S. and J.R.B. also received support from the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001), co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund. There was no additional external funding received for this study.”.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Thirteenth general programme of work. 2019. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/324775/WHO-PRP-18.1-eng.pdf
  • 2.Cassini A, Högberg LD, Plachouras D, Quattrocchi A, Hoxha A, Simonsen GS, et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: A population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):56–66. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30605-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Willems RPJ, van Dijk K, Vehreschild MJGT, Biehl LM, Ket JCF, Remmelzwaal S, et al. Incidence of infection with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in carriers: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(6):719–31. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00811-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dorado-García A, Smid JH, van Pelt W, Bonten MJM, Fluit AC, van den Bunt G, et al. Molecular relatedness of ESBL/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli from humans, animals, food and the environment: a pooled analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(2):339–47. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kluytmans JAJW, Overdevest ITMA, Willemsen I, Kluytmans-van den Bergh MFQ, van der Zwaluw K, Heck M, et al. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli from retail chicken meat and humans: Comparison of strains, plasmids, resistance genes, and virulence factors. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(4):478–87. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ludden C, Moradigaravand D, Jamrozy D, Gouliouris T, Blane B, Naydenova P, et al. A one health study of the genetic relatedness of Klebsiella pneumoniae and their mobile elements in the East of England. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(2):219–26. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Martak D, Guther J, Verschuuren TD, Valot B, Conzelmann N, Bunk S, et al. Populations of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are different in human-polluted environment and food items: A multicentre European study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(3):447.e7-447.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.07.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hendrickx AP, Landman F, de Haan A, Witteveen S, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Schouls LM. blaOXA-48-like genome architecture among carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Netherlands. Microb Genom. 2021;7(5):000512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nang SC, Li J, Velkov T. The rise and spread of mcr plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2019;45(2):131–61. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2018.1492902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abdel-Rahim MH, El-Badawy O, Hadiya S, Daef EA, Suh S-J, Boothe DM, et al. Patterns of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae Isolated from the Assiut University Hospitals, Egypt: A comparative study. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25(4):509–19. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2018.0249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li P, Liu D, Zhang X, Tuo H, Lei C, Xie X, et al. Characterization of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in gram-negative bacterial strains from animals and humans in China. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25(7):1050–6. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2018.0405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mitra S, Mukherjee S, Naha S, Chattopadhyay P, Dutta S, Basu S. Evaluation of co-transfer of plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance genes and blaNDM gene in Enterobacteriaceae causing neonatal septicaemia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:46. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0477-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang Y, Yang J, Ye L, Luo Y, Wang W, Zhou W. Characterization of clinical multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, 2007-2009, China. Microb Drug Resist. 2012;18(5):465–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou H, Zhang K, Chen W, Chen J, Zheng J, Liu C, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae collected from 17 hospitals in Nanjing district of China. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0674-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Riccio ME, Verschuuren T, Conzelmann N, Martak D, Meunier A, Salamanca E, et al. Household acquisition and transmission of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) -producing Enterobacteriaceae after hospital discharge of ESBL-positive index patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(9):1322–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Göpel S, Guther J, Gladstone BP, Conzelmann N, Bunk S, Terzer T, et al. Drivers of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- producing Enterobacterales colonization among residents of long-term care facilities: A European multicentre prospective cohort study. J Hosp Infect. 2025;157:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(11):2640–4. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 13, 2022, The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Available from: https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_13.0_Breakpoint_Tables.xlsx [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(12):3491–500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Verschuuren TD, van Hout D, Arredondo-Alonso S, Fluit AC, Reuland EA, Top J. Comparative genomics of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) reveals a similar distribution of the 10 most prevalent ESBL-Ec clones and ESBL genes among human community faecal and extra-intestinal infection isolates in the Netherlands (2014–17). J Antimicrob Chem. 2021;76(4):901–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1355–61. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wolda H. Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia. 1981;50(3):296–302. doi: 10.1007/BF00344966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Perestrelo S, Correia Carreira G, Valentin L, Fischer J, Pfeifer Y, Werner G, et al. Comparison of approaches for source attribution of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Germany. PLoS One. 2022;17(7):e0271317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kizny Gordon AE, Mathers AJ, Cheong EYL, Gottlieb T, Kotay S, Walker AS, et al. The hospital water environment as a reservoir for carbapenem-resistant organisms causing hospital-acquired infections-A systematic review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(10):1435–44. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Talon D. The role of the hospital environment in the epidemiology of multi-resistant bacteria. J Hosp Infect. 1999;43(1):13–7. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1999.0613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arredondo-Alonso S, Willems RJ, van Schaik W, Schürch AC. On the (im)possibility of reconstructing plasmids from whole-genome short-read sequencing data. Microb Genom. 2017;3(10):e000128. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gabriel Trueba

21 Jul 2025

Dear Dr. Verschuuren,

plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Gabriel Trueba, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating in your Funding Statement:

[The MODERN studies (Understanding and modelling reservoirs, vehicles and transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community and long term care facilities) were part of a Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance collaborative  research project, under the 2016 Joint Call framework (Transnational Research Projects on the Transmission Dynamics of Antibacterial Resistance). It received funding from the following national research agencies: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant no. AC16/00076), Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant no. 681055, 547001004), Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 40AR40-173608), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01KI1701), the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-16-JPEC-0007-03), and UK Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/R004536/1). Elena Salamanca, and Jesús Rodríguez-Baño received support for research from by the Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001), co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014–2020.].

Please provide an amended statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support (whether external or internal to your organization) received during this study, as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now.  Please also include the statement “There was no additional external funding received for this study.” in your updated Funding Statement.

Please include your amended Funding Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

[The MODERN studies (Understanding and modelling reservoirs, vehicles and transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community and long term care facilities) were part of a Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance collaborative  research project, under the 2016 Joint Call framework (Transnational Research Projects on the Transmission Dynamics of Antibacterial Resistance). It received funding from the following national research agencies: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant no. AC16/00076), Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant no. 681055, 547001004), Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 40AR40-173608), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01KI1701), the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-16-JPEC-0007-03), and UK Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/R004536/1). Elena Salamanca, and Jesús Rodríguez-Baño received support for research from by the Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001), co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014–2020.].

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. Thank you for stating the following in your manuscript:

[The MODERN studies (Understanding and modelling reservoirs, vehicles and transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community and long term care facilities) were part of a Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance collaborative  research project, under the 2016 Joint Call framework (Transnational Research Projects on the Transmission Dynamics of Antibacterial Resistance). It received funding from the following national research agencies: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant no. AC16/00076), Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant no. 681055, 547001004), Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 40AR40-173608), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01KI1701), the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-16-JPEC-0007-03), and UK Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/R004536/1). Elena Salamanca, and Jesús Rodríguez-Baño received support for research from by the Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001), co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014–2020.]

We note that you have provided funding information that is currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

[The MODERN studies (Understanding and modelling reservoirs, vehicles and transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community and long term care facilities) were part of a Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance collaborative  research project, under the 2016 Joint Call framework (Transnational Research Projects on the Transmission Dynamics of Antibacterial Resistance). It received funding from the following national research agencies: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant no. AC16/00076), Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant no. 681055, 547001004), Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 40AR40-173608), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01KI1701), the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-16-JPEC-0007-03), and UK Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/R004536/1). Elena Salamanca, and Jesús Rodríguez-Baño received support for research from by the Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001), co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014–2020.].

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

6. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include authors TD Verschuuren, J Guther, ME Riccio, D Martak, E Salamanca, S Göpel, N Conzelmann, J Scharringa, P Musicha, IB Autenrieth, BS Cooper, D Hocquet, E Tacconelli, J Rodriguez-Baño, S Harbarth, AC Fluit, S Peter, and JAJW Kluytmans.

7. Please amend your authorship list in your manuscript file to include authors Tess Verschuuren, Julia Guther, Maria Eugenia Riccio, Daniel Martak, Elena Salamanca, Siri Göpel, Nadine Conzelmann, Jelle Scharringa, Patrick Musicha, Ingo B. Autenrieth, Ben S. Cooper, Didier Hocquet, Evelina Tacconelli, Jesus Rodriguez-Baño, Stephan Harbarth, Ad C. Fluit, Silke Peter, and Jan A.J.W. Kluytmans.

8. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The authors present a study on the epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae. The work is based on isolates collected from five European metropolitan areas, which were genome-sequenced and analyzed using in silico approaches. Analyses of antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) content, core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST), and core genome comparisons allowed the authors to explore clonal relationships between isolates. The topic is of public health relevance, and the manuscript is generally well-written and easy to follow.

Minor comments:

The possible role of the hospital or LTCF environment as a reservoir or amplifier of multidrug-resistant bacteria is not discussed. This would be particularly relevant given the healthcare-associated nature of the study population.

The limitations section occupies more than half of the discussion and could be slightly condensed to improve balance with the rest of the text.

While the authors mention the need for long-read sequencing, they could elaborate more specifically on the types of questions that such technology would enable (e.g., plasmid structure, transmission dynamics of mobile genetic elements).

Would the authors consider routine genomic surveillance in hospitals or LTCFs useful? This could be suggested as a potential recommendation for future practice.

Reviewer #2: The study addresses a very important and pertinent issue. Epidemiological, laboratory and statistical methodology was great and innovative. As far as results are concerned, there was a bit if discrepancy between the text on line 158 and the table where text says Table 1 shows mrc-1 gene in an ESBL-EC strain while text indicates it is in an ESBL- Kp!!! Otherwise the results are well represented and easy to understand. The discussion analyses the results notes the limitations. Overall study is well designed, done and excellently written.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Henry Mawerere Kajumbula

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org

PLoS One. 2026 Jan 7;21(1):e0337346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337346.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


22 Oct 2025

Journal Requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

We adjusted the manuscript based on PLOS ONE’s style requirements. Including font, lay-out of headers, from British English to American English, and reference style.

2. Thank you for stating in your Funding Statement:

[The MODERN studies (Understanding and modelling reservoirs, vehicles and transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community and long term care facilities) were part of a Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance collaborative research project, under the 2016 Joint Call framework (Transnational Research Projects on the Transmission Dynamics of Antibacterial Resistance). It received funding from the following national research agencies: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant no. AC16/00076), Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant no. 681055, 547001004), Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 40AR40-173608), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01KI1701), the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-16-JPEC-0007-03), and UK Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/R004536/1). Elena Salamanca, and Jesús Rodríguez-Baño received support for research from by the Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001), co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014–2020.].

Please provide an amended statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support (whether external or internal to your organization) received during this study, as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now. Please also include the statement “There was no additional external funding received for this study.” in your updated Funding Statement.

Please include your amended Funding Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

We have amended the funding statement, and included ‘there was no additional external funding received for this study, see below.

Funding statement

The MODERN studies (Understanding and modelling reservoirs, vehicles and transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community and long term care facilities) were part of a Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance collaborative research project, under the 2016 Joint Call framework (Transnational Research Projects on the Transmission Dynamics of Antibacterial Resistance). It received funding from the following national research agencies: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant no. AC16/00076), Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant no. 681055, 547001004), Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 40AR40-173608), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01KI1701), the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-16-JPEC-0007-03), and UK Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/R004536/1). Elena Salamanca, and Jesús Rodríguez-Baño received support for research from by the Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001), co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014–2020. There was no additional external funding received for this study.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

[The MODERN studies (Understanding and modelling reservoirs, vehicles and transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community and long term care facilities) were part of a Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance collaborative research project, under the 2016 Joint Call framework (Transnational Research Projects on the Transmission Dynamics of Antibacterial Resistance). It received funding from the following national research agencies: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant no. AC16/00076), Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant no. 681055, 547001004), Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 40AR40-173608), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01KI1701), the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-16-JPEC-0007-03), and UK Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/R004536/1). Elena Salamanca, and Jesús Rodríguez-Baño received support for research from by the Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001), co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014–2020.].

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

We have amended ‘Role of Funder statement’

Role of Funder statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

5. Thank you for stating the following in your manuscript:

[The MODERN studies (Understanding and modelling reservoirs, vehicles and transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community and long term care facilities) were part of a Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance collaborative research project, under the 2016 Joint Call framework (Transnational Research Projects on the Transmission Dynamics of Antibacterial Resistance). It received funding from the following national research agencies: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant no. AC16/00076), Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant no. 681055, 547001004), Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 40AR40-173608), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01KI1701), the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-16-JPEC-0007-03), and UK Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/R004536/1). Elena Salamanca, and Jesús Rodríguez-Baño received support for research from by the Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001), co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014–2020.]

We note that you have provided funding information that is currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

[The MODERN studies (Understanding and modelling reservoirs, vehicles and transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community and long term care facilities) were part of a Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance collaborative research project, under the 2016 Joint Call framework (Transnational Research Projects on the Transmission Dynamics of Antibacterial Resistance). It received funding from the following national research agencies: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant no. AC16/00076), Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant no. 681055, 547001004), Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 40AR40-173608), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01KI1701), the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant no. ANR-16-JPEC-0007-03), and UK Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/R004536/1). Elena Salamanca, and Jesús Rodríguez-Baño received support for research from by the Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0001), co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund A way to achieve Europe, Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014–2020.].

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

We removed the funding statement from the manuscript.

6. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include authors TD Verschuuren, J Guther, ME Riccio, D Martak, E Salamanca, S Göpel, N Conzelmann, J Scharringa, P Musicha, IB Autenrieth, BS Cooper, D Hocquet, E Tacconelli, J Rodriguez-Baño, S Harbarth, AC Fluit, S Peter, and JAJW Kluytmans.

It’s not clear what needs to be amended here, the author list is correct. Should first names be replaced to first letter only? The author list form in the submission data in the editorial manager page seems to request full first names.

7. Please amend your authorship list in your manuscript file to include authors Tess Verschuuren, Julia Guther, Maria Eugenia Riccio, Daniel Martak, Elena Salamanca, Siri Göpel, Nadine Conzelmann, Jelle Scharringa, Patrick Musicha, Ingo B. Autenrieth, Ben S. Cooper, Didier Hocquet, Evelina Tacconelli, Jesus Rodriguez-Baño, Stephan Harbarth, Ad C. Fluit, Silke Peter, and Jan A.J.W. Kluytmans.

We amended authorship list to

Tess D. Verschuuren1,2, Julia Guther3, Maria Eugenia Riccio4, Daniel Martak5,6, Elena Salamanca7, Siri Göpel8, Nadine Conzelmann8, Jelle Scharringa9, Patrick Musicha10, Ingo B. Autenrieth11, Ben S. Cooper10, Didier Hocquet5,6, Evelina Tacconelli8,12, Jesús Rodríguez-Baño7, Stephan Harbarth4, Ad C. Fluit9, Silke Peter3, Jan A. J. W. Kluytmans2,9

8. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

A supporting information section was added to the manuscript

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Not applicable

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Done

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The authors present a study on the epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae. The work is based on isolates collected from five European metropolitan areas, which were genome-sequenced and analyzed using in silico approaches. Analyses of antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) content, core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST), and core genome comparisons allowed the authors to explore clonal relationships between isolates. The topic is of public health relevance, and the manuscript is generally well-written and easy to follow.

Reviewer 1, thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript.

Minor comments:

The possible role of the hospital or LTCF environment as a reservoir or amplifier of multidrug-resistant bacteria is not discussed. This would be particularly relevant given the healthcare-associated nature of the study population.

We have added the following sentence to the discussion (L265) ‘Hospital and LTCF environments are well-established as significant reservoirs and amplifiers of multi-drug resistant bacteria, contributing to the persistence and spread of these organisms within healthcare settings and the broader community [16, 24, 25].’

The limitations section occupies more than half of the discussion and could be slightly condensed to improve balance with the rest of the text.

Agreed, we have shortened the limitations section to about 2/3rds of the original length.

While the authors mention the need for long-read sequencing, they could elaborate more specifically on the types of questions that such technology would enable (e.g., plasmid structure, transmission dynamics of mobile genetic elements).

Thank you for this suggestion. We find that this point is the main limitation of the study, and future results from nanopore sequencing analyses are of interest to the scientific community.

We have added a few details on challenges with assembly due to repetitive sequences (L272), but refrained from adding more information on long-read sequencing for the sake of brevity. ‘Several limitations must be acknowledged. Firstly, horizontal gene transfer of ARGs could not be assessed due to limitations of short-read sequencing technology in reconstructing mobile genetic elements such as plasmids [26]. Ongoing MODERN studies using previously completed nanopore sequencing aim to address plasmid characterization, overcoming any issues with repetitive sequence elements.’

Would the authors consider routine genomic surveillance in hospitals or LTCFs useful? This could be suggested as a potential recommendation for future practice.

As the consideration of genomic surveillance as a routine procedure would ensuite a more detailed discussion about the appropriateness of the effort and the benefits, and should furthermore incorporate discussion about AMR in mobile genetic elements, we refrain from elaborating such recommendations within this manuscript.

Reviewer #2: The study addresses a very important and pertinent issue. Epidemiological, laboratory and statistical methodology was great and innovative. As far as results are concerned, there was a bit if discrepancy between the text on line 158 and the table where text says Table 1 shows mrc-1 gene in an ESBL-EC strain while text indicates it is in an ESBL- Kp!!! Otherwise the results are well represented and easy to understand. The discussion analyses the results notes the limitations. Overall study is well designed, done and excellently written.

Reviewer 2, thank you for taking the time to read and comment on our MS, many thanks for pointing this discrepancy out. The mrc-1 gene indeed belonged to an ESBL-Kp from food collected in Tübingen (isolate_625 in S2_Table). Table 2 was incorrect and has been adjusted accordingly.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0337346.s004.docx (115.1KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Gabriel Trueba

6 Nov 2025

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from human carriage, the human-polluted environment, and food: molecular epidemiology of two prospective cohorts in five European metropolitan areas

PONE-D-25-20088R1

Dear Dr. Verschuuren,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Gabriel Trueba, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Gabriel Trueba

PONE-D-25-20088R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Verschuuren,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Gabriel Trueba

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix. Supplementary appendix.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0337346.s001.docx (7.1MB, docx)
    S1 Table. Strainfile.

    Contains data of all included strains in this study.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0337346.s002.xlsx (144.8KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0337346.s004.docx (115.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    Raw reads are available on the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA), under the accession number PRJEB50545. Metadata with accession numbers are available in the supplementary material. Online access interactive maximum-likelihood trees: ESBL-Ec: https://microreact.org/project/wSXSAfjgAH1Xr9af46Hbcb-modern-project-esbl-e-coli-n475, ESBL-Kp: https://microreact.org/project/vRJHCdos8zWcv4yHMTKjak-modern-project-esbl-k-pneumoniae.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES