Abstract
Background
Endovascular therapy (EVT) is the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. While predictors of 90-day functional outcome are well-established, the determinants of functional recovery remain less clearly defined in the post-discharge period for patients with initial disability. We aimed to identify the predictors of functional outcome at 3 months in patients who underwent EVT and were discharged with an unmet need for recovery (modified Rankin scale (mRS) score > 2).
Methods
A multi-center, observational cohort study was conducted using data from the Big Data Observatory Platform for Stroke in China. We included 836 patients from eight comprehensive stroke centers (August 2018 – December 2024) who received EVT, had a pre-stroke mRS of 0–2, and had an mRS > 2 at discharge. The primary outcome was functional outcome at 3 months post-EVT, defined as an mRS score of 0–2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors.
Results
Of the 836 patients, 151 (18.1%) achieved a favorable functional outcome (mRS 0–2) at 3 months. In univariate analysis, the favorable outcome group was significantly younger, had a lower pre-EVT NIHSS, a lower rate of atrial fibrillation, a higher rate of intravenous thrombolysis, a higher rate of complete recanalization (mTICI 3), and a lower rate of parenchymal hematoma (PH) (all p < 0.05). Multivariate regression confirmed four independent predictors: younger age (aOR: 0.973; 95% CI: 0.958–0.989; p = 0.001), lower pre-EVT NIHSS (aOR: 0.940; 95% CI: 0.912–0.968; p < 0.001), complete recanalization (aOR: 1.921; 95% CI: 1.305–2.826; p = 0.001), and absence of PH (aOR: 0.424; 95% CI: 0.235–0.768; p = 0.005).
Conclusion
A significant proportion of patients discharged with disability experiences meaningful functional recovery by 3 months post-EVT. The key predictors of this subsequent recovery are younger age, milder initial stroke severity, complete reperfusion, and the avoidance of hemorrhagic complications.
Keywords: Endovascular thrombectomy, Functional outcome, Stroke recovery, Prognosis, Reperfusion
Introduction
Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of long-term adult disability and mortality worldwide [28, 36]. The advent of endovascular therapy (EVT), particularly mechanical thrombectomy, has revolutionized the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO), offering unprecedented rates of vascular recanalization and improved clinical outcomes [11, 38, 40]. Landmark randomized controlled trials have unequivocally established EVT, in conjunction with best medical management, as the standard of care for eligible patients, demonstrating significant benefits in functional independence compared to medical therapy alone [5, 13, 14].
The primary efficacy measure in these pivotal studies, and in contemporary clinical practice, is the degree of functional recovery at 90 days, typically assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) [18, 32, 35, 46]. A favorable outcome is conventionally defined as a mRS score of 0–2, denoting functional independence [31, 49]. Consequently, a substantial body of research has been dedicated to identifying predictors of this short-to-medium term functional status, with well-established factors including younger age, lower baseline stroke severity as measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, mTICI 2b-3), and the absence of significant hemorrhagic complications [10, 19, 22, 26, 27, 51, 52, 54].
However, a significant proportion of patients are discharged from acute care with persistent functional dependence (mRS > 2). The clinical trajectory of these patients is dynamic and particularly consequential, yet it remains less well understood. While discharge planning and early post-acute care are often informed by the 90-day prognosis, there is a critical gap in understanding the determinants of functional outcomes specifically between discharge and the 3-month mark for this dependent population [12, 16, 17, 21, 24, 29, 30, 41]. This post-discharge phase is critical as it reflects the period of most intensive rehabilitation and the patient's initial reintegration into their community, directly impacting long-term quality of life [4]. The factors that govern recovery during this subsequent period may differ from those influencing the initial 90-day window, being potentially more influenced by the neurological reserve established during the acute phase, as well as rehabilitation access, social support structures, and long-term complication management [2, 16, 45].
Despite its clinical importance for prognostication and rehabilitation planning, the predictors of continued recovery trajectory specifically after discharge in functionally dependent EVT patients remain less comprehensively characterized. Most studies conclude their follow-up at 90 days, often without focusing on the subpopulation that was dependent at discharge, leaving a gap in knowledge regarding which of these patients are most likely to experience further improvement [33, 39, 43]. Understanding these predictors is essential for optimizing long-term care pathways, setting realistic patient expectations, and efficiently allocating rehabilitation resources.
Therefore, to address this gap in the literature, we designed a multi-center observational study. Our primary objective was to identify the key baseline, clinical, and procedural predictors associated with achieving functional independence by 3 months specifically in patients who were discharged with functional dependence (mRS > 2) after undergoing EVT for acute ischemic stroke. By elucidating these factors, our findings aim to contribute to more stratified and personalized long-term management strategies for this important subgroup of stroke survivors.
Methods
Study design and population
This was a multi-center, observational, retrospective cohort study conducted using data from the Big Data Observatory Platform for Stroke in China. We included consecutive patients with AIS secondary to LVO who underwent EVT at one of eight comprehensive stroke centers in China between August 2018 and December 2024.
The study inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age ≥ 18 years; 2) pre-stroke functional independence, defined by a mRS score of 0–2; 3) presentation within 24 h of symptom onset (or from the last known well time for patients with unwitnessed onset), 4) pre-treatment Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) of ≥ 6 on non-contrast CT imaging; 5) underwent EVT (mechanical thrombectomy with or without prior intravenous thrombolysis). The exclusion criteria were applied as follows: 1) pre-EVT neurological deficit deemed too mild (NIHSS score ≤ 6); 2) in-hospital mortality; 3) discharge to a rehabilitation or chronic care facility with an already-favorable functional status (mRS score 0–2 at discharge), as the study focus was on predicting recovery in those with unmet need; 4) lost to 3-month follow-up.
The time of discharge was determined by the treating clinical team based on standard clinical criteria, including medical stability and completion of acute stroke workup. The median time from EVT to discharge was 14.0 days.
Data collection and variables
Relevant data were obtained retrospectively from the prospectively maintained databases of each participating hospital's stroke registry, which were integrated into the central Big Data Observatory Platform. The collected variables included baseline demographics (age and sex), vascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, previous stroke, and smoking status), stroke severity and imaging (pre-EVT NIHSS score and pre-EVT ASPECTS), treatment parameters (administration of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and onset-to-puncture time (OPT)), and procedural outcome (degree of reperfusion post-thrombectomy, assessed using the mTICI scale). Successful reperfusion was defined as mTICI 2b–3, and complete reperfusion was defined as mTICI 3. Safety outcome was the occurrence of parenchymal hematoma (PH), as defined by the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) criteria [25].
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), when administered, was primarily performed with Alteplase at a standard dose of 0.9 mg/kg (maximum 90 mg), with 10% as an initial bolus, followed by a 60-min infusion of the remaining 90%, in accordance with national guidelines. IVT was administered prior to EVT (bridging therapy) in all eligible patients presenting within the approved time window.
Outcome measures
The primary outcome of the study was the functional outcome, defined as the functional status at 3 months post-EVT. Outcome was assessed during routine clinical follow-up visits or via standardized telephone interviews by certified neurologists or research nurses blinded to the study hypothesis. Functional outcome was measured using the mRS. A favorable functional outcome was defined as an mRS score of 0–2 (functional independence). An unfavorable outcome was defined as an mRS score of 3–6 (functional dependence or death).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were compared using the independent Student’s t-test. Non-normally distributed data are presented as median with interquartile range (IQR) and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages and were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. To identify independent predictors of a favorable functional outcome (mRS 0–2 at 3 months), variables with a p-value < 0.1 in the univariate analysis (as indicated in Table 1) were entered into a multivariate binary logistic regression model using the backwards stepwise (likelihood ratio) method. This relaxed threshold was used to minimize the risk of excluding potential confounding variables from the multivariate model. The results of the regression analysis are presented as adjusted odds ratios (OR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A two-tailed p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all final analyses.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of patients
| mRS 3–6 at 90 days (n, %) | mRS 2 at 90 days (n, %) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 685 | 151 | |
| Age (y), (median, IQR) | 69.0 (59.0–76.0) | 65.0 (54.0–74.0) | 0.001** |
| Male sex | 422 (61.61) | 101 (66.89) | 0.225 |
| Hypertension | 463 (67.59) | 97 (64.24) | 0.428 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 186 (27.15) | 35 (23.18) | 0.316 |
| Coronary artery diseases | 122 (17.81) | 23 (15.23) | 0.449 |
| Smoker | 167 (24.38) | 44 (29.14) | 0.223 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 263 (38.39) | 45 (29.80) | 0.048* |
| Previous stroke | 152 (22.19) | 25 (16.56) | 0.125 |
| Dyslipidemia | 143 (20.88) | 42 (27.81) | 0.063 |
| Pre-EVT NIHSS (median, IQR) | 18.000 (14.0- 22.0) | 15.000 (11.0–19.0) | 0.000** |
| Pre-EVT ASPECTS (median, IQR) | 8.000 (7.0- 10.0) | 9.000 (8.0- 9.0) | 0.355 |
| Intravenous thrombolysis | 232 (33.87) | 64 (42.38) | 0.048* |
| OPT (median, IQR), min | 320.00 (207.5–525.5) | 330.000 (210.0- 570.0) | 0.685 |
| Complete recanalization | 379 (55.33) | 103 (68.21) | 0.004** |
| Parenchymal hematoma | 131 (19.21) | 14 (9.27) | 0.004** |
ASPECTS The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, EVT endovascular thrombectomy, IQR interquartile range, NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, OPT onset-to-puncture time. *Denotes significance
Results
Patient selection and baseline characteristics
From August 2018 to December 2024, a total of 1579 patients who underwent EVT for acute ischemic stroke were initially screened across the eight participating centers. After applying the exclusion criteria, 836 patients were included in the final analysis. Exclusions were for the following reasons: 65 patients had a pre-EVT NIHSS ≤ 6, 94 died during the hospital stay, 563 had a favorable functional status (mRS 0–2) at discharge, and 21 were lost to the 3-month follow-up (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
A flowchart demonstrating patient selection in the current study
The cohort was stratified based on the 3-month functional outcome. A total of 151 patients (18.1%) achieved a favorable functional outcome (mRS 0–2), while 685 patients (81.9%) had an unfavorable outcome (mRS 3–6).
The baseline characteristics of the two groups are summarized in Table 1.
Compared to the unfavourable outcome group, patients with a favorable outcome were significantly younger (median 65.0 vs. 69.0 years, p ≤ 0.001) and had a lower median pre-EVT NIHSS score (15.0 vs. 18.0, p ≤ 0.001). The prevalence of atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the favorable outcome group (29.80% vs. 38.39%, p = 0.048). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the favorable outcome group received intravenous thrombolysis (42.38% vs. 33.87%, p = 0.048) and achieved complete recanalization (mTICI 3) (68.21% vs. 55.33%, p = 0.004). Furthermore, the occurrence of parenchymal hematoma was significantly less frequent in the favorable outcome group (9.27% vs. 19.21%, p = 0.004). No other significant differences were observed in other vascular risk factors, sex, pre-EVT ASPECTS, or onset-to-puncture time between the two groups.
Regarding mortality, the overall rate of death (mRS 6) at 3 months was 26.91%. As expected, all deaths occurred in the unfavorable outcome group, constituting 32.85% of those patients. No patients in the favorable outcome group (mRS 0–2) had died by the 3-month follow-up.”
Multivariate analysis for predictors of functional outcome
Variables with a p-value < 0.1 in the univariate analysis (age, atrial fibrillation, pre-EVT NIHSS, intravenous thrombolysis, complete recanalization, and parenchymal hematoma) were included in a multivariate binary logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of a favorable functional outcome at 3 months.
As presented in Table 2, the analysis identified four independent predictors:
Younger age (adjusted OR: 0.973 per year increase; 95% CI: 0.958–0.989; p = 0.001)
Lower pre-EVT NIHSS Score (adjusted OR: 0.940 per point increase; 95% CI: 0.912–0.968; p ≤ 0.001)
Complete recanalization (mTICI 3) (adjusted OR: 1.921; 95% CI: 1.305–2.826; p = 0.001)
Absence of parenchymal hematoma (adjusted OR: 0.424; 95% CI: 0.235–0.768; p = 0.005)
Table 2.
Factors associated with functional outcome at 3 months after multivariate regression
| Variables | Coefficient | p | OR | OR of 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | −0.027 | 0.001* | 0.973 | 0.958—0.989 |
| Atrial fibrillation | −0.065 | 0.763 | 0.937 | 0.615—1.428 |
| Pre-EVT NIHSS | −0.062 | 0.000* | 0.940 | 0.912—0.968 |
| IVT Thrombosis | 0.319 | 0.095 | 1.375 | 0.946—1.999 |
| Complete Recanalization (mTICI = 3) | 0.653 | 0.001* | 1.921 | 1.305—2.826 |
| Parenchymal hematoma | −0.857 | 0.005* | 0.424 | 0.235—0.768 |
EVT endovascular thrombectomy, IQR interquartile range, mTICI modified treatment in cerebral infarction, NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. *Denotes significance
Atrial fibrillation and intravenous thrombolysis were not independent predictors in the multivariate model (AF: p = 0.763; IVT: p = 0.095).
The modal outcome was an mRS score of 4, indicating moderately severe disability.
Discussion
This multi-center, observational study provides valuable insights into the determinants of functional recovery in the post-discharge period for ischemic stroke patients who were functionally dependent at discharge. Our key finding is that a significant proportion of these patients (18.1%) who were dependent at discharge (mRS > 2) achieved functional independence (mRS 0–2) by the 3-month mark. This highlights that the recovery trajectory does not end at discharge for a clinically relevant minority. We identified four independent predictors of this meaningful recovery: younger age, lower baseline NIHSS, complete recanalization (mTICI 3), and the absence of parenchymal hematoma.
The identification of these predictors specifically within a cohort of patients who all shared a common starting point of disability at discharge is a key strength of our study. It moves beyond predicting the initial 90-day outcome and instead helps answer the clinically pressing question: "Among my patients leaving the hospital disabled, who has the greatest potential for further meaningful recovery?".
The finding that younger age is a powerful predictor of better long-term outcome is one of the most consistent themes in stroke literature, which is strongly reinforced by our results [37]. This neuroplastic potential appears to be a crucial driver for recovery even after the acute phase, enabling a greater response to rehabilitation in the months following discharge [1, 44]. Similarly, a lower pre-intervention NIHSS score, representing a smaller initial ischemic insult, logically portends a higher potential for recovery [20, 42]. Our results confirm that a smaller initial ischemic insult not only predicts a better outcome at 90 days but also identifies a greater latent potential for improvement specifically among those who have not yet recovered by the time of discharge.
The strong association between complete recanalization (mTICI 3) and favorable outcome underscores the paramount importance of achieving the highest possible degree of reperfusion. While successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) is an established goal, our analysis adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that there is a significant clinical gradient between "successful" (mTICI 2b) and "complete" (mTICI 3) reperfusion [15, 34, 53]. A TICI 3 result ensures maximal salvage of the ischemic penumbra, minimizes the final infarct volume, and provides a more substantial neuroanatomical substrate upon which post-stroke rehabilitation can act [6]. Our study suggests that the benefit of complete reperfusion extends beyond preventing early deterioration; it actively enables continued neurological improvement well after discharge by maximizing the preserved neuroanatomical substrate upon which post-stroke rehabilitation can act.
Conversely, the development of parenchymal hematoma was a potent negative predictor, associated with a 58% reduction in the odds of achieving a good later outcome. This complication appears to create a profound and lasting barrier to recovery, significantly diminishing the potential for the functional gains that typically occur in the post-acute period [7, 23]. Parenchymal hematoma typically signifies severe blood–brain barrier disruption and irreversible tissue injury, often leading to clinical deterioration that nullifies the benefits of recanalization and creating a new, often prohibitive, barrier to functional recovery [3, 9].
Interestingly, while intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) showed a positive trend in univariate analysis, it was not an independent predictor in the multivariate model. This suggests that its benefit may be largely mediated through its ability to facilitate higher rates of complete recanalization, an effect that has been observed in other studies [8, 47]. Furthermore, the loss of statistical significance for atrial fibrillation (AF) in multivariate analysis indicates that its negative impact on outcome is likely conveyed through other mechanisms, such as an association with more severe baseline strokes, larger clot burdens, or a higher comorbidity profile, which was accounted for by other variables in the model [48, 50].
Limitations
Our study has several limitations. Firstly, its observational and retrospective design inherently carries risks of unmeasured confounding despite our multivariate adjustments. Factors not captured in our registry, such as the intensity, quality, and type of post-discharge rehabilitation, social support networks, socioeconomic status, and specific post-discharge complication management, likely play a crucial role in long-term recovery. [32] Secondly, while multi-center, the data originated from a single healthcare system in China, which may limit the generalizability of our findings to other populations with different stroke care pathways. Finally, the 3-month follow-up, while standard, may not capture the full extent of long-term recovery, which can continue for up to a year in some patients. Third, the mTICI score was categorized as 0, 1, 2a, 2b, and 3. The potentially distinct category of mTICI 2c was not consistently recorded across all participating centers, precluding a separate analysis of its effect compared to mTICI 2b and 3.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that for patients discharged with disability after EVT, functional recovery is a dynamic process that continues meaningfully for a substantial minority. We have identified key factors that predict this subsequent improvement to functional independence. These findings reinforce that functional status at discharge should not be viewed as a definitive endpoint for prognostication. Instead, in patients discharged with an mRS > 2, factors such as younger age, milder initial stroke severity, complete reperfusion, and the absence of hemorrhagic complication can help clinicians identify those with a significant potential for further recovery by 3 months, thereby guiding rehabilitation strategies and patient counseling.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Mohammad Mofatteh, Xiao Xiao, Yimin Chen, Yuzheng Lai, Wenhong Peng
Investigation: Mohammad Mofatteh, Xiao Xiao, Yimin Chen, Junyi Hu, Mingzhu Feng, Jicai Ma, Lue Chen, Sijie Zhou, Xiuling Zhang, Xu Zunbao, Jiale Wu, Yongting Zhou, Yuzheng Lai, Wenhong Peng
Data curation: Mohammad Mofatteh, Xiao Xiao, Yimin Chen, Junyi Hu, Mingzhu Feng, Jicai Ma, Lue Chen, Sijie Zhou, Xiuling Zhang, Xu Zunbao, Jiale Wu, Yongting Zhou, Yuzheng Lai, Wenhong Peng
Formal analysis: Mohammad Mofatteh, Xiao Xiao, Yimin Chen, Junyi Hu, Mingzhu Feng, Jicai Ma, Lue Chen, Sijie Zhou, Xiuling Zhang, Xu Zunbao, Jiale Wu, Yongting Zhou, Yuzheng Lai, Wenhong Peng
Visualization: Mohammad Mofatteh
Writing and editing- Original Draft: Mohammad Mofatteh
Writing and editing- Review: Mohammad Mofatteh, Xiao Xiao, Yimin Chen, Junyi Hu, Mingzhu Feng, Jicai Ma, Lue Chen, Sijie Zhou, Xiuling Zhang, Xu Zunbao, Jiale Wu, Yongting Zhou, Yuzheng Lai, Wenhong Peng
Supervision: Mohammad Mofatteh, Xiao Xiao, Yimin Chen, Yuzheng Lai, Wenhong Peng
Funding
Yimin Chen was supported by the China Scholarship Council at the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (No.202409310004).
Data availability
Relevant data and materials are available by contacting the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board or research ethics committee of each participating centers. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Human ethics and consent to participate declarations
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board or research ethics committee of each participating centers. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Given the retrospective nature of the analysis utilizing anonymized registry data, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committees.
Consent to participate
Consent to participation was not required due to the retrospective nature of the study according to local and national guidelines. Given the retrospective nature of the analysis utilizing anonymized registry data, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committees.
Clinical trial number
Not applicable.
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mohammad Mofatteh, Xiao Xiao and Yimin Chen contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Mohammad Mofatteh, Email: mmofatteh01@qub.ac.uk.
Yuzheng Lai, Email: linkie936@foxmail.com.
Wenhong Peng, Email: plate20072007@163.com.
References
- 1.Anderson V, Spencer-Smith M, Wood A (2011) Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult. Brain 134:2197–2221. 10.1093/brain/awr103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ballester BR, Maier M, Duff A, Cameirão M, Bermúdez S, Duarte E, Cuxart A, Rodríguez S, San Segundo Mozo RM, Verschure P (2019) A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke. J Neurophysiol 122:350–357. 10.1152/jn.00762.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bernardo-Castro S, Sousa JA, Brás A, Cecília C, Rodrigues B, Almendra L, Machado C, Santo G, Silva F, Ferreira L, Santana I, Sargento-Freitas J (2020) Pathophysiology of blood–brain barrier permeability throughout the different stages of ischemic stroke and its implication on hemorrhagic transformation and recovery. Front Neurol. 10.3389/fneur.2020.594672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boehme C, Toell T, Lang W, Knoflach M, Kiechl S (2021) Longer term patient management following stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke 16:917–926. 10.1177/17474930211016963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Campbell BCV, Khatri P (2020) Stroke. Lancet 396:129–142. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31179-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chamorro Á, Blasco J, López A, Amaro S, Román LS, Llull L, Renú A, Rudilosso S, Laredo C, Obach V, Urra X, Planas AM, Leira EC, Macho J (2017) Complete reperfusion is required for maximal benefits of mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients. Sci Rep 7:11636. 10.1038/s41598-017-11946-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Charbonnier G, Bonnet L, Biondi A, Moulin T (2021) Intracranial bleeding after reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 10.3389/fneur.2020.629920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheng W, Mofatteh M, Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Lu S, Su P, Chen Y, Li L, Qin L, Zuo X, Lan Y, Huang Y, Yu Z, Luo Z, Chen G (2023) Impact of thrombolysis time metrics when participating in National Stroke Center construction project. J Multidiscip Healthc 16:3333–3338. 10.2147/jmdh.S432458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dasari R, Bonsack F, Sukumari-Ramesh S (2021) Brain injury and repair after intracerebral hemorrhage: the role of microglia and brain-infiltrating macrophages. Neurochem Int 142:104923. 10.1016/j.neuint.2020.104923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dhillon PS, Butt W, Marei O, Podlasek A, McConachie N, Lenthall R, Nair S, Malik L, Bhogal P, Makalanda HLD, Dineen RA, England TJ (2023) Incidence and predictors of poor functional outcome despite complete recanalisation following endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 32:107083. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Elfil M, Godeiro Coelho LM, Sabet H, Bayoumi A, Abbas A, Eatz T, Aladawi M, Najdawi Z, Nidamanuri P, Saleem S, Surowiec L, Malik A (2025) Endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke patients with concomitant intracranial hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci 134:111093. 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.French MA, Hayes H, Johnson JK, Young DL, Roemmich RT, Raghavan P (2024) The effect of post-acute rehabilitation setting on 90-day mobility after stroke: a difference-in-difference analysis. medRxiv. 10.1101/2024.01.08.2430102639072023 [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DWJ, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Dávalos A, Majoie CBLM, van der Lugt A, de Miquel MA, Donnan GA, Roos YBWEM, Bonafe A, Jahan R, Diener H-C, van den Berg LA, Levy EI, Berkhemer OA, Pereira VM, Rempel J, Millán M, Davis SM, Roy D, Thornton J, Román LS, Ribó M, Beumer D, Stouch B, Brown S, Campbell BCV, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Saver JL, Hill MD, Jovin TG (2016) Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 387:1723–1731. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Goyal M, Yu AYX, Menon BK, Dippel DWJ, Hacke W, Davis SM, Fisher M, Yavagal DR, Turjman F, Ross J, Yoshimura S, Miao Z, Bhatia R, Almekhlafi M, Murayama Y, Sohn S-I, Saver JL, Demchuk AM, Hill MD (2016) Endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 47:548–553. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Goyal N, Tsivgoulis G, Frei D, Turk A, Baxter B, Froehler MT, Mocco J, Ishfaq MF, Malhotra K, Chang JJ, Hoit D, Elijovich L, Loy D, Turner RD, Mascitelli J, Espaillat K, Alexandrov AV, Arthur AS (2019) Comparative safety and efficacy of modified TICI 2b and TICI 3 reperfusion in acute ischemic strokes treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Neurosurgery 84:680–686. 10.1093/neuros/nyy097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grefkes C, Fink GR (2020) Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives. Neurol Res Pract 2:17. 10.1186/s42466-020-00060-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.de Groot AJ, Smit EB, Keizer D, Hertogh CMPM, van Balen R, van der Wouden JC, Wattel EM (2024) Consensus and controversies on post-acute care decision making and referral to geriatric rehabilitation: A national survey. Int J Nurs Stud Adv 7:100245. 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Havenon A, Tirschwell DL, Heitsch L, Cramer SC, Braun R, Cole J, Reddy V, Majersik JJ, Lindgren A, Worrall BB (2021) Variability of the Modified Rankin Scale Score Between Day 90 and 1 Year After Ischemic Stroke. Neurology Clinical Practice 11:e239–e244. 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Heitkamp C, Heitkamp A, Winkelmeier L, Thaler C, Flottmann F, Schell M, Kniep HC, Broocks G, Heit JJ, Albers GW, Thomalla G, Fiehler J, Faizy TD (2024) Predictors of futile recanalization in ischemic stroke patients with low baseline NIHSS. Int J Stroke 19:1102–1112. 10.1177/17474930241264737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Inoa V, Aron AW, Staff I, Fortunato G, Sansing LH (2014) Lower NIH stroke scale scores are required to accurately predict a good prognosis in posterior circulation stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 37:251–255. 10.1159/000358869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jain E, Harmon EY, Sonagere MB (2021) Functional outcomes and post-discharge care sought by patients with COVID-19 compared to matched controls after completing inpatient acute rehabilitation. PM R 13:618–625. 10.1002/pmrj.12607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kaesmacher J, Chaloulos-Iakovidis P, Panos L, Mordasini P, Heldner MR, Kurmann CC, Michel P, Hajdu SD, Ribo M, Requena M, Maegerlein C, Friedrich B, Costalat V, Benali A, Pierot L, Gawlitza M, Schaafsma J, Pereira VM, Gralla J, Fischer U (2019) Clinical effect of successful reperfusion in patients presenting with NIHSS < 8: data from the BEYOND-SWIFT registry. J Neurol 266:598–608. 10.1007/s00415-018-09172-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kovács KB, Bencs V, Hudák L, Oláh L, Csiba L (2023) Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic strokes. Int J Mol Sci. 10.3390/ijms241814067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kowalkowski M, Chou S-H, McWilliams A, Lashley C, Murphy S, Rossman W, Papali A, Heffner A, Russo M, Burke L, Gibbs M, Taylor SP, Brown R, Burke L, Chou S-H, Cunningham K, Evans SL, Furney S, Gibbs M, Heffner A, Hetherington T, Howard D, Kowalkowski M, Lindblom S, McCall A, McCurdy L, McWilliams A, Murphy S, Papali A, Polk C, Rossman W, Runyon M, Russo M, Spencer M, Taylor B, Taylor S (2019) Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. Trials 20:660. 10.1186/s13063-019-3792-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.von Kummer R, Broderick JP, Campbell BCV, Demchuk A, Goyal M, Hill MD, Treurniet KM, Majoie CBLM, Marquering HA, Mazya MV, Román LS, Saver JL, Strbian D, Whiteley W, Hacke W (2015) The Heidelberg Bleeding Classification. Stroke 46:2981–2986. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lai Y, Jou E, Mofatteh M, Nguyen TN, Ho JSY, Diana F, Dmytriw AA, He J, Yan W, Chen Y, Yan Z, Sun H, Yeo LL, Chen Y, Zhou S (2023) 7-day National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale as a surrogate marker predicting ischemic stroke patients’ outcome following endovascular therapy. Transl Neurosci 14:20220307. 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lai Y, Mofatteh M, Baizabal-Carvallo JF, He J, Wu W, Wang D, Yan W, Ma J, Zhou S, Sun Y, He Y, Li S, Sun H (2025) Identifying the predictors of ultra early neurological improvement and its role in functional outcome after endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 10.3389/fneur.2025.1492013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li X-y, Kong X-m, Yang C-h, Cheng Z-f, Lv J-j, Guo H, Liu X-h (2024) Global, regional, and national burden of ischemic stroke, 1990–2021: an analysis of data from the global burden of disease study 2021. eClinMed. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li S (2023) Stroke recovery is a journey: prediction and potentials of motor recovery after a stroke from a practical perspective. Life. 10.3390/life13102061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li X, He Y, Wang D, Rezaei MJ (2024) Stroke rehabilitation: from diagnosis to therapy. Front Neurol. 10.3389/fneur.2024.1402729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu X, Zhou M, Zhao J, Gao Y, Wang Y, Zhou J, Wan L, Nie G, Wang Y (2022) Functional independence and disability evaluation in stroke patients: optimal cutoff scores for a pictorial-based Longshi Scale, Barthel Index, and Modified Rankin Scale. Front Neurol. 10.3389/fneur.2022.710852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Manchi MR, Venkatachalam AM, Atem FD, Stone S, Mathews AA, Abraham AM, Chavez AA, Welch BG, Ifejika NL (2023) Effect of inpatient rehabilitation facility care on ninety day modified Rankin score in ischemic stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 32:107109. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Migdady I, Johnson-Black PH, Leslie-Mazwi T, Malhotra R (2023) Current and emerging endovascular and neurocritical care management strategies in large-core ischemic stroke. J Clin Med. 10.3390/jcm12206641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nie X, Leng X, Miao Z, Fisher M, Liu L (2023) Clinically ineffective reperfusion after endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 54:873–881. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ospel JM, Brown S, Bosshart S, Stebner A, Uchida K, Demchuk A, Saver JL, White P, Muir KW, Dippel DWJ, Majoie C, Jovin TG, Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Bracard S, Guillemin F, Hill M, Goyal M (2025) Modified Rankin Scale at 90 days versus National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 24 hours as primary outcome in acute stroke trials. J Am Heart Assoc 14:e037752. 10.1161/jaha.124.037752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pu L, Wang L, Zhang R, Zhao T, Jiang Y, Han L (2023) Projected global trends in ischemic stroke incidence, deaths and disability-adjusted life years from 2020 to 2030. Stroke 54:1330–1339. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rådholm K, Arima H, Lindley RI, Wang J, Tzourio C, Robinson T, Heeley E, Anderson CS, Chalmers J (2015) Older age is a strong predictor for poor outcome in intracerebral haemorrhage: the INTERACT2 study. Age Ageing 44:422–427. 10.1093/ageing/afu198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rodriguez-Calienes A, Vivanco-Suarez J, Dibas M, Casanova D, Galecio-Castillo M, Farooqui M, Ortega-Gutierrez S (2023) Current challenges in the endovascular treatment of medium vessel occlusions. Frontiers in Stroke. 10.3389/fstro.2023.1242961 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rogalewski A, Klein N, Friedrich A, Kitsiou A, Schäbitz M, Zuhorn F, Gess B, Berger B, Klingebiel R, Schäbitz WR (2024) Functional long-term outcome following endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Neurol Res Pract 6:2. 10.1186/s42466-023-00301-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sahoo A, Abdalkader M, Yamagami H, Huo X, Sun D, Jia B, Weyland CS, Diana F, Kaliaev A, Klein P, Bui J, Kasab SA, de Havenon A, Zaidat OO, Zi W, Yang Q, Michel P, Siegler JE, Yaghi S, Hu W, Nguyen TN (2023) Endovascular therapy for acute stroke: new evidence and indications. J Neuroendovasc Ther 17:232–242. 10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Saway BF, Palmer C, Hughes C, Triano M, Suresh RE, Gilmore J, George M, Kautz SA, Rowland NC (2024) The evolution of neuromodulation for chronic stroke: from neuroplasticity mechanisms to brain-computer interfaces. Neurotherapeutics 21:e00337. 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Seetge J, Cséke B, Karádi ZN, Bosnyák E, Szapáry L (2025) Stroke-SCORE: personalizing acute ischemic stroke treatment to improve patient outcomes. J Pers Med. 10.3390/jpm15010018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sluis WM, Hinsenveld WH, Goldhoorn RB, Potters LH, Bruggeman AA, van der Hoorn A, Bot JC, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Lingsma HF, Hofmeijer J, van Zwam WH, Blm Majoie C, van der Worp H (2023) Timing and causes of death after endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Eur Stroke J 8:215–223. 10.1177/23969873221143210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Su F, Xu W (2020) Enhancing brain plasticity to promote stroke recovery. Front Neurol. 10.3389/fneur.2020.554089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Szelenberger R, Kostka J, Saluk-Bijak J, Miller E (2020) Pharmacological interventions and rehabilitation approach for enhancing brain self-repair and stroke recovery. Curr Neuropharmacol 18:51–64. 10.2174/1570159x17666190726104139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Taleb S, Ji-hyun Lee J, Asanad S, Starkman S, Hamilton S, Gornbein J, Conwit RA, Sanossian N, Saver JL (2024) Modified Rankin Scale disability status at day 4 poststroke is an informative predictor of long-term day 90 outcome. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 33:107902. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tang H, Yan S, Wu C, Zhang Y (2021) Characteristics and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in mild ischemic stroke patients. Front Neurol 12:744909. 10.3389/fneur.2021.744909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tu HT, Campbell BC, Christensen S, Desmond PM, De Silva DA, Parsons MW, Churilov L, Lansberg MG, Mlynash M, Olivot JM, Straka M, Bammer R, Albers GW, Donnan GA, Davis SM (2015) Worse stroke outcome in atrial fibrillation is explained by more severe hypoperfusion, infarct growth, and hemorrhagic transformation. Int J Stroke 10:534–540. 10.1111/ijs.12007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Weisscher N, Vermeulen M, Roos YB, de Haan RJ (2008) What should be defined as good outcome in stroke trials; a modified Rankin score of 0-1 or 0-2? J Neurol 255:867–874. 10.1007/s00415-008-0796-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wu W, Pitton Rissardo J, Nguyen TN, Mofatteh M, Wei H, Liebeskind DS, Yang S, Li W, Pan W, Zhou S, Lai Y, Gao J, Wang J, Ouyang Z, Mai Y, Meng H, Chen Y, Liao X (2023) Effect of atrial fibrillation on outcomes in patients with anterior circulation occlusion stroke receiving endovascular therapy. Front Aging Neurosci 15:1160265. 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1160265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Xu Z, Grewal S, Mofatteh M, Dmytriw AA, Zhao D, Chen B, Chen H, He W, Luo R, Li Z, Li Q (2024) Can ischemic stroke patients with mTICI of 2b achieve similar outcomes compared to those with complete recanalization following endovascular therapy? Front Neurol. 10.3389/fneur.2024.1486586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yan Z, Mofatteh M, Nguyen TN, Regenhardt RW, Zeng X, Dharmarasu S, Wu J, Chen B, Zeng Z, Gao J, Yang R, Yang S, Liao X (2025) Development and validation of muscle strength improvement in 24 hours to predict ischemic stroke patients’ outcome after endovascular therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine. 10.1097/MD.0000000000042055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zeng H, Zhou J, Huang C, Zhu Q (2025) Clinical application of the modified Pullicino formula in endovascular thrombectomy in acute anterior circulation large cerebral infarction—a two-center retrospective study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 34:108137. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhou S, Mofatteh M, Chen Z, Tang J, Ma J, Ouyang Z, Wang J, Luo S, He Y, Li Z, Lai Y, Liao X (2025) Predictive outcome of late window ischemic stroke patients following endovascular therapy: a multi-center study. Front Neurol. 10.3389/fneur.2025.1489714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Relevant data and materials are available by contacting the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

