Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1980 Jan;298:235–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013078

Summation of rod signals within the receptive field centre of cat retinal ganglion cells.

C Enroth-Cugell, T H Harding
PMCID: PMC1279113  PMID: 7359397

Abstract

1. The processing of rod signals within the receptive field centre of cat retinal ganglion cells was investigated in two spot summation experiments by using the analytical methods of response and sensitivity summation. 2. The rod system was isolated by presenting test stimuli of short wave-length light against either a completely dark background or a dim background of long wave-length light. 3. Stimulus--response curves were obtained for two small, square-wave modulated test spots applied at points in the receptive field centre of equal sensitivity. The test spots were presented either singly or simultaneously. 4. In the absence of surround antagonism, the flux required to evoke a weak criterion response was the same whether the spots were presented singly or together. However, the flux required to evoke larger responses was typically half as great when the two spots were delivered together as it was when either was presented alone. 5. Over a moderate response range, the magnitude of response to the two test spots presented together equalled the algebraic sum of the two responses to the test spots presented alone. However, for responses of large magnitude, the algebraic sum was larger. 6. Permitting the surround to contribute substantially to the cell's response changed the outcome of the two spot summation experiment. 7. The data are consistent with a three stage model of signal processing within the receptive field centre: an early compressive power law transformation (within each sub-area) of illuminance into a neural signal which is followed by linear summation of sub-area signals and then a second compressive transformation.

Full text

PDF
235

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow H. B., Levick W. R. Three factors limiting the reliable detection of light by retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1969 Jan;200(1):1–24. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cleland B. G., Enroth-cugell C. Quantitative aspects of sensitivity and summation in the cat retina. J Physiol. 1968 Sep;198(1):17–38. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cleland B. G., Levick W. R., Sanderson K. J. Properties of sustained and transient ganglion cells in the cat retina. J Physiol. 1973 Feb;228(3):649–680. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Creutzfeldt O. D., Sakmann B., Scheich H., Korn A. Sensitivity distribution and spatial summation within receptive-field center of retinal on-center ganglion cells and transfer function of the retina. J Neurophysiol. 1970 Sep;33(5):654–671. doi: 10.1152/jn.1970.33.5.654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Easter S. S., Jr Excitation in the goldfish retina: evidence for a non-linear intensity code. J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(2):253–271. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Enroth-Cugell C., Hertz G., Lennie P. Cone signals in the cat's retina. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):273–296. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Enroth-Cugell C., Lennie P., Shapley R. M. Surround contribution to light adaptation in cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1975 Jun;247(3):579–588. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Enroth-Cugell C., Robson J. G. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1966 Dec;187(3):517–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grüsser O. J. A quantitative analysis of spatial summation of excitation and inhibition within the receptive field of retinal ganglion cells of cats. Vision Res. 1971;Suppl 3:103–127. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(71)90034-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grüsser O. J., Schaible D., Vierkant-Glathe J. A quantitative analysis of the spatial summation of excitation within the receptive field centers of retinal neurons. Pflugers Arch. 1970;319(2):101–121. doi: 10.1007/BF00592490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harding T. H., Enroth-Cugell C. Absolute dark sensitivity and center size in cat retinal ganglion cells. Brain Res. 1978 Sep 15;153(1):157–162. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)91138-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hochstein S., Shapley R. M. Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(2):265–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KUFFLER S. W. Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol. 1953 Jan;16(1):37–68. doi: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.1.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levine M. W., Abramov I. An analysis of spatial summation in the receptive fields of goldfish retinal ganglion cells. Vision Res. 1975 Jul;15(7):777–789. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(75)90255-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rodieck R. W., Stone J. Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Sep;28(5):832–849. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.5.833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stone J., Fabian M. Summing properties of the cat's retinal ganglion cell. Vision Res. 1968 Aug;8(8):1023–1040. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90075-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. de Monasterio F. M. Center and surround mechanisms of opponent-color X and Y ganglion cells of retina of macaques. J Neurophysiol. 1978 Nov;41(6):1418–1434. doi: 10.1152/jn.1978.41.6.1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES