Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1980 Feb;299:85–99. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013112

The adequacy of stretch receptors in the cat knee joint for signalling joint angle throughout a full range of movement.

W R Ferrell
PMCID: PMC1279212  PMID: 7381780

Abstract

1. The present experiments were performed to resolve the discrepancy between the experiments of Boyd & Roberts (1953) in which receptors active at intermediate angles (mid range units) were frequently encountered, and the experiments of Burgess & Clark (1969) where mid range units were rarely encountered. 2. The discharge of knee joint afferents in the cat posterior articular nerve was recorded from both the dorsal roots and from the intact joint nerve. 3. No receptors were isolated which exhibited intermediate adaptation rates (similar to the "phasic" receptors described by Burgess & Clark, 1969). 4. The proportion of mid range units isolated in the present experiments (17.8%) was substantially larger than in the experiments of Burgess & Clark (4.8%). 5. Direct recordings from the posterior articular nerves of a series of cats revealed that there were always receptors tonically active at all intermediate positions. 6. Afferents from the popliteus muscle did not make a major contribution to the population of mid range units in the posterior articular nerve as removal of the popliteus muscle did not significantly alter the mean number of mid range units in the joint nerves of a series of nine cats. 7. Succinylcholine (SCh) in low doses (0.05-0.1 mg/kg) was found not to be specific for spindle afferents as these doses of SCh could elevate the resting discharge of mid range units of true articular origin. 8. It is concluded that slowly adapting joint receptors can adequately signal joint angle throughout the full normal range of movement and hence could make an important contribution to position sense.

Full text

PDF
85

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOYD I. A., ROBERTS T. D. Proprioceptive discharges from stretch-receptors in the knee-joint of the cat. J Physiol. 1953 Oct;122(1):38–58. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burgess P. R., Clark F. J. Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat. J Physiol. 1969 Aug;203(2):317–335. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark F. J., Burgess P. R. Slowly adapting receptors in cat knee joint: can they signal joint angle? J Neurophysiol. 1975 Nov;38(6):1448–1463. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.6.1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dutia M. B. Activation of cat spindle secondary sensory endings by intravenous infusion of suxamethonium [proceedings]. J Physiol. 1977 Dec;273(2):89P–90P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferrell W. R. The discharge of mechanoreceptors in the cat knee joint at intermediate angles [proceedings]. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(1):23P–24P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GRANIT R., SKOGLUND S., THESLEFF S. Activation of muscle spindles by succinylcholine and decamethonium, the effects of curare. Acta Physiol Scand. 1953;28(2-3):134–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1953.tb00964.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Godwin-Austen R. B. The mechanoreceptors of the costo-vertebral joints. J Physiol. 1969 Jun;202(3):737–753. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goslow G. E., Jr, Reinking R. M., Stuart D. G. The cat step cycle: hind limb joint angles and muscle lengths during unrestrained locomotion. J Morphol. 1973 Sep;141(1):1–41. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051410102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grigg P. Mechanical factors influencing response of joint afferent neurons from cat knee. J Neurophysiol. 1975 Nov;38(6):1473–1484. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.6.1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lundberg A., Malmgren K., Schomburg E. D. Role of joint afferents in motor control exemplified by effects on reflex pathways from Ib afferents. J Physiol. 1978 Nov;284:327–343. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McCall W. D., Jr, Farias M. C., Williams W. J., BeMent S. L. Static and dynamic responses of slowly adapting joint receptors. Brain Res. 1974 Apr 19;70(2):221–243. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90314-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McCloskey D. I. Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol Rev. 1978 Oct;58(4):763–820. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1978.58.4.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Millar J. Flexion-extension sensitivity of elbow joint afferents in cat. Exp Brain Res. 1975 Dec 22;24(2):209–214. doi: 10.1007/BF00234064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SKOGLUND S. Anatomical and physiological studies of knee joint innervation in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1956;36(124):1–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES