Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1980;300:89–103. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013153

Saxitoxin binding to sodium channels of rat skeletal muscles.

C M Bay, G R Strichartz
PMCID: PMC1279346  PMID: 6247488

Abstract

1. The saturable binding of exchange-labelled tritiated saxitoxin (STX) to the extensor digitorum longus (e.d.l.), diaphragm and soleus muscles of adult rats was studied. By measuring STX uptake to small pieces of muscle, the dissociation constant (KD) and binding capacity could be determined for individual muscles. 2. The affinity for STX is very similar in all three muscles, with a KD of 4.3 +/- 0.3, 5.1 +/- 0.5 and 4.9 +/- 0.5 nM (mean +/- S.E. of mean) at 4 degrees C for e.d.l., diaphragm and soleus respectively. The maximum binding capacity, which varies between different muscles, is 52.6 +/- 2.5, 40.3 +/- 4.9 and 23.8 +/- 1.1 f-mole.mg wet wt.-1 respectively. 3. The affinity of e.d.l. for tetrodotoxin (TTX), measured by inhibition of STX binding, is 12.1 +/- 1.4 nM at 4 degrees C. Raising the temperature to 37 degrees C increases the KD for STX to 6.8 +/- 0.8 nM and the KD for TTX to 47.5 +/- 4.5 nM. 4. STX binding is pH dependent; protons compete with STX for the binding site as if there were a titratable acidic group with a pK of 5.5. 5. The binding capacity of the diaphragm is not uniform along the length of the muscle fibres. Binding at the ends of the fibres is only 78% of that in the central region. 6. Denervation of e.d.l. for 7 days causes no change in the affinity for STX. There is a slight reduction in the binding capacity from 54 +/- 5 to 43 +/- 3 f-mole.mg wet wt.-1. There is no change in the diameter of the muscle fibres.

Full text

PDF
89

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian R. H., Marshall M. W. Sodium currents in mammalian muscle. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(1):223–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almers W., Levinson S. R. Tetrodotoxin binding to normal depolarized frog muscle and the conductance of a single sodium channel. J Physiol. 1975 May;247(2):483–509. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bastian J., Nakajima S. Action potential in the transverse tubules and its role in the activation of skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Feb;63(2):257–278. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.2.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buckley G. A., Heaton J. A quantitative study of cholinesterase in myoneural junctions from rat and guinea-pig extraocular muscles. J Physiol. 1968 Dec;199(3):743–749. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell D. T., Hille B. Kinetic and pharmacological properties of the sodium channel of frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Mar;67(3):309–323. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.3.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisenberg B. R., Kuda A. M. Discrimination between fiber populations in mammalian skeletal muscle by using ultrastructural parameters. J Ultrastruct Res. 1976 Jan;54(1):76–88. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(76)80010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gauthier G. F., Padykula H. A. Cytological studies of fiber types in skeletal muscle. A comparative study of the mammalian diaphragm. J Cell Biol. 1966 Feb;28(2):333–354. doi: 10.1083/jcb.28.2.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris J. B., Thesleff S. Studies on tetrodotoxin resistant action potentials in denervated skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 Nov;83(3):382–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1971.tb05091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Henderson R., Ritchie J. M., Strichartz G. R. The binding of labelled saxitoxin to the sodium channels in nerve membranes. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):783–804. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jaimovich E., Venosa R. A., Shrager P., Horowicz P. Density and distribution of tetrodotoxin receptors in normal and detubulated frog sartorius muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Apr;67(4):399–416. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.4.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Levinson S. R. The purity of tritiated tetrodotoxin as determined by bioassay. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1975 Jun 10;270(908):337–348. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1975.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Redfern P., Thesleff S. Action potential generation in denervated rat skeletal muscle. II. The action of tetrodotoxin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 May;82(1):70–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1971.tb04943.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ritchie J. M., Rogart R. B. Characterization of exchange-labeled saxitoxin and the origin of linear uptake by excitable tissue. Mol Pharmacol. 1977 Nov;13(6):1136–1146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ritchie J. M., Rogart R. B., Strichartz G. R. A new method for labelling saxitoxin and its binding to non-myelinated fibres of the rabbit vagus, lobster walking leg, and garfish olfactory nerves. J Physiol. 1976 Oct;261(2):477–494. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ritchie J. M., Rogart R. B. The binding of labelled saxitoxin to the sodium channels in normal and denervated mammalian muscle, and in amphibian muscle. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):341–354. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ritchie J. M., Rogart R. B. The binding of saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin to excitable tissue. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1977;79:1–50. doi: 10.1007/BFb0037088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schantz E. J., Lynch J. M., Vayvada G., Matsumoto K., Rapoport H. The purification and characterization of the poison produced by Gonyaulax catenella in axenic culture. Biochemistry. 1966 Apr;5(4):1191–1195. doi: 10.1021/bi00868a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Strichartz G., Cohen I. Vmax as a measure of GNa in nerve and cardiac membranes. Biophys J. 1978 Jul;23(1):153–156. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85440-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thesleff S., Vyskocil F., Ward M. R. The action potential in end-plate and extrajunctional regions of rat skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand. 1974 Jun;91(2):196–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1974.tb05676.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ulbricht W., Wagner H. H. The influence of pH on equilibrium effects of tetrodotoxin on myelinated nerve fibres of Rana esculenta. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;252(1):159–184. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES