Skip to main content
Open Forum Infectious Diseases logoLink to Open Forum Infectious Diseases
. 2026 Jan 11;13(Suppl 1):ofaf695.2152. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2152

P-1985. Multi-pathogen screening of lesion swab specimens submitted for clinical testing at a national reference laboratory

Anuradha Rao 1, Courtney Sabino 2, Heather Bowers 3, Julie Sullivan 4, Leda Bassitt 5, Kaleb McLendon 6, Sharmila Talekar 7, Joseph Najjar 8, Evelyn K Williams 9, Nira Pollock 10, Carlos L Aparicio 11, Pamela A Miller 12, Eric Lai 13, Wilbur A Lam 14, Gregory L Damhorst 15,1,2
PMCID: PMC12793563

Abstract

Background

Infections presenting with localized or generalized lesions have a broad range of etiologies with different treatment implications. Targeted molecular testing is not always pursued for lesion swabs but is feasible using FDA-authorized assays or laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). As part of the NIH/NIBIB Independent Test Assessment Program (ITAP) for Diagnostic Mpox Lesion Panel Test Validation, we screened de-identified remnant lesion swab specimens from a reference laboratory for the primary purpose of identifying negative specimen matrix for test validation activities. This screening provided insight into the pathogens present in lesion specimens that tested negative on the originally ordered clinical test.

Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of screening of remnant lesion swabs specimens performed for our test validation program. Specimens were sourced from a national reference laboratory where they had tested negative on a molecular test for Mpox or a multiplex molecular Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)–1&2 and Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV) test as part of clinical care.

Methods

346 specimens (Copan swabs in Universal Transport Media (UTM)) in which Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)–1&2 and Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV) or Mpox were not detected at the source reference laboratory were screened for our program with at least one assay. Most specimens were further diluted 1:10 in transport media prior to testing on one or more of the following: the Xpert® Mpox assay (GeneXpert), a Treponema pallidum quantitative PCR LDT, and the Simplexa® HSV 1&2 Direct and VZV Swab Direct kits (LIAISON® MDX). Specimens producing positive results on any assay were not tested further, and 15 specimens with invalid results were excluded from further testing and analysis.

Results

For specimens originally negative for HSV and VZV, 3 discordant results (1 HSV-2+, 2 VZV+), no Mpox, and 1 T. pallidum were detected (Table 1). For specimens originally negative for Mpox, 17 HSV-1+, 21 HSV-2+, 11 VZV+, 1 specimen HSV-1+ and HSV-2+, 1 specimen HSV-2+ and VZV+, 4 T. pallidum, and no Mpox were detected.

Conclusion

Although limited by dilution procedures and lack of clinical information, our data suggest that specimens primarily tested for HSV-1/2 and/or VZV rarely exhibit T. pallidum or Mpox as an alternative etiology. In contrast, more than one quarter of specimens originally tested for Mpox and found to be negative were from lesions potentially attributable to T. pallidum, HSV, or varicella infections. In part due to the emergence of Mpox as a sexually transmitted infection in the United States, multiplex NAATs for microbial causes of lesions may be clinically useful.

Disclosures

Evelyn K. Williams, PhD, Diasorin: Grant/Research Support Wilbur A. Lam, MD, PhD, Sanguina, Inc: Board Member|Sanguina, Inc: several patents that have come from my lab|Sanguina, Inc: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)


Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES