Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1991 Fall;24(3):459–471. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-459

Increasing habilitative services for persons with profound handicaps: an application of structural analysis to staff management.

C W Green 1, D H Reid 1, L I Perkins 1, S M Gardner 1
PMCID: PMC1279597  PMID: 1752837

Abstract

We evaluated a structural analysis methodology for enhancing the utility of a staff management program. In Experiment 1, a structural analysis of direct-care staff behavior in a mental retardation facility revealed differences in work patterns over time. Specific times were identified when few basic care duties were necessary and staff engaged in nonwork activity. In Experiment 2, a management program was implemented to increase staff members' training activities during periods identified through the structural analysis. The program was accompanied by increases in training activities and decreases in nonwork behavior. The improvements were maintained during a 43-week period while the most labor-intensive component of the program was withdrawn. Staff acceptability measures indicated a positive response to the management intervention, although responses varied across components within the multifaceted program. The increased training was accompanied by beneficial changes among clients with profound handicaps. Results are discussed regarding practical considerations for improving staff performance and for adopting innovations resulting from applied research.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Axelrod S. Functional and structural analyses of behavior: approaches leading to reduced use of punishment procedures? Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(2):165–178. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burgio L. D., Whitman T. L., Reid D. H. A participative management approach for improving direct-care staff performance in an institutional setting. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;16(1):37–53. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Green C. W., Reid D. H., Canipe V. S., Gardner S. M. A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;24(3):537–552. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Green C. W., Reid D. H., White L. K., Halford R. C., Brittain D. P., Gardner S. M. Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):31–43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Greene B. F., Willis B. S., Levy R., Bailey J. S. Measuring client gains from staff-implemented programs. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Fall;11(3):395–412. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ivancic M. T., Reid D. H., Iwata B. A., Faw G. D., Page T. J. Evaluating a supervision program for developing and maintaining therapeutic staff-resident interactions during institutional care routines. J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Spring;14(1):95–107. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. King L. Comment on "Adoption of innovations from applied behavioral research: ;Does anybody care?'". J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Winter;14(4):507–511. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Korabek C. A., Reid D. H., Ivancic M. T. Improving needed food intake of profoundly handicapped children through effective supervision of institutional staff. Appl Res Ment Retard. 1981;2(1):69–88. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(81)90007-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Landesman-Dwyer S., Sackett G. P. Behavioral changes in nonambulatory, profoundly mentally retarded individuals. Monogr Am Assoc Ment Defic. 1978;(3):55–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pace G. M., Ivancic M. T., Edwards G. L., Iwata B. A., Page T. J. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249–255. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Panyan M., Boozer H., Morris N. Feedback to attendants as a reinforcer for applying operant techniques. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Spring;3(1):1–4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Repp A. C., Felce D., de Kock U. Observational studies of staff working with mentally retarded persons: a review. Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(2):331–350. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90011-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rusch F. R., Kazdin A. E. Toward a methodology of withdrawal designs for the assessment of response maintenance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Summer;14(2):131–140. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stolz S. B. Adoption of innovations from applied behavioral research: "Does anybody care?". J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Winter;14(4):491–505. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Touchette P. E., MacDonald R. F., Langer S. N. A scatter plot for identifying stimulus control of problem behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Winter;18(4):343–351. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Welsch W. V., Ludwig C., Radiker J. E., Krapfl J. E. Effects of feedback on daily completion of behavior modification projects. Ment Retard. 1973 Aug;11(4):24–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van Den Pol R. A., Reid D. H., Fuqua R. W. Peer training of safety-related skills to institutional staff: benefits for trainers and trainees. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Summer;16(2):139–156. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES