Abstract
Some learners with multiple disabilities display idiosyncratic gestures that are interpreted as a means of making choices. In the present study, we assessed the validity of idiosyncratic choice-making behaviors of 3 children with multiple disabilities. Opportunities for each child to choose between food and drink were provided under two conditions. In one condition, the children were given the food or drink item corresponding to their prior choice. In the other condition, the teacher delivered the item opposite to that chosen. It was reasoned that valid choice-making behaviors would be reflected in a greater tendency to accept the chosen item and refuse the unchosen item. Direct observations revealed all children consistently indicated choices during both conditions. Choices of both the food and drink items were made by all 3 children. A reversal design demonstrated that acts of refusal were more frequent when choices were followed by delivery of the item opposite to that chosen. Similar assessment procedures may be effective in determining the function of idiosyncratic gestures exhibited by persons with multiple disabilities. For children lacking such skills, intervention to teach valid choice-making behaviors may be needed to complement assessment procedures.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dattilo J. Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Winter;19(4):445–448. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goetz L., Schuler A., Sailor W. Teaching functional speech to the severely handicapped: current issues. J Autism Dev Disord. 1979 Dec;9(4):325–343. doi: 10.1007/BF01531443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green C. W., Reid D. H., White L. K., Halford R. C., Brittain D. P., Gardner S. M. Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):31–43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mithaug D. E., Hanawalt D. A. The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Spring;11(1):153–162. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mithaug D. E., Mar D. K. The relation between choosing and working prevocational tasks in two severely retarded young adults. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Spring;13(1):177–182. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pace G. M., Ivancic M. T., Edwards G. L., Iwata B. A., Page T. J. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249–255. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parsons M. B., Reid D. H. Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: providing opportunities to make choices. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):183–195. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]