Abstract
Non-peripheral (displaced) myonuclei are characteristic of skeletal muscle pathology and severe injury but also appear after exercise and with aging. Displaced myonuclei are typically attributed to the activity of muscle stem cells, or satellite cells. We sought to address whether displaced myonuclei in adult skeletal muscle are exclusively from an exogenous source such as satellite cells or can result from resident myonuclear migration. To address this question, we used a murine recombination-independent muscle fibre-specific doxycycline-inducible fluorescent myonuclear labelling approach, EdU stem cell fate tracking, two durations of plantaris muscle mechanical overload (MOV, 3 days and 7 days), and fluorescent histology. Our findings show that: 1) displaced myonuclei emerge early during MOV in adult mice, 2) resident myonuclear movement occurs rapidly during MOV, and 3) the contribution of resident versus exogenous displaced myonuclei depends on the preferential effects of MOV for specific fibre types or fibre sizes with a given MOV duration. These observations provide fundamental insights on myonuclear motility in response to stress in vivo and reframe our understanding of how a recognized feature of mammalian skeletal muscle can emerge in response to stressors such as mechanical loading.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13395-025-00407-0.
Introduction
In healthy adult skeletal muscle, nuclei in syncytial muscle fibres (myonuclei) are situated on the periphery of the cell. In model systems, this peripheral positioning arises during development [51] when centralized myonuclei are squeezed by the contractile apparatus towards the periphery, reducing the space for myonuclei in the centre of the muscle fibre [51, 52]. Myonuclei are then reportedly “anchored” by dystrophin to restrict their movement [47]. Myonuclear peripheral placement may facilitate their role as mechanosensors in muscle fibres [7, 60], be related to vascular organization [50, 57], and/or contribute to proper regulation of the “myonuclear domain” [1, 18]. A preponderance of displaced and centralized myonuclei characterize degenerative disease states such as muscular dystrophy [7, 28]. Displaced myonuclei also manifest during conditions of extreme muscle stress such as chemical injury and severe trauma [4, 19, 48]. Since muscle stem cells – or satellite cells – are indispensable for muscle regeneration [29, 33, 45, 56], the presence of displaced myonuclei is classically attributed to the activities of these cells [48]. Regenerating muscle fibres are initiated by satellite cell fusion resulting in displaced or centralized myonuclei in myotubes that may ultimately relocate peripherally when the muscle fibre matures [7, 28, 48].
Satellite cells are widely accepted as the explanation for displaced and centralized myonuclei in nearly all contexts; however, there is a growing understanding that resident myonuclei are more mobile than previously appreciated in mature muscle fibres [1, 53]. Recent evidence shows that resident non-satellite cell-derived myonuclei migrate to the site of injury after focal membrane damage to support repair in mature muscle fibres [54]. Furthermore, displaced myonuclei are a feature of muscle fibres after high-volume primarily concentric voluntary exercise [12, 25], appear concomitant with muscle aging independent from severe injury [8, 55], emerge during muscle loading in the absence of overt degeneration/regeneration [44], and are characteristic of denervation as well as certain non-degenerative myopathies [7, 17] and cancer cachexia [9, 66]. Displaced myonuclei are lower in prevalence during mechanical loading in the absence of satellite cells relative to satellite cell replete muscle, but not eliminated [33]. These observations collectively suggest that displaced myonuclei may originate from non-satellite cell sources. Against this background, we ask: what is the source of displaced myonuclei in healthy adult skeletal muscle undergoing stress?
To address this fundamental question, we used our recombination-independent muscle fibre-specific doxycycline-inducible murine genetic model of fluorescent myonuclear labelling, called HSA-GFP (human skeletal actin reverse tetracycline transactivator tetracycline response element histone 2b green fluorescent protein) [22, 36, 39, 63, 64]. With this model, we can fluorescently-label myonuclei in the presence of doxycycline and the GFP signal will remain once the GFP transgene is inactivated following the removal of doxycycline. To encourage the appearance of displaced myonuclei without complete regeneration, we utilized the synergist ablation mechanical overload (MOV) approach. MOV is a loading and lengthening hypertrophic stimulus for skeletal muscle [5, 6, 40] that can cause the appearance of displaced myonuclei above levels observed in unperturbed muscle [33, 44]. In our hands, most muscle fibres during MOV remain intact, do not degenerate, and undergo appreciable hypertrophy after several weeks, [11, 42, 43, 46]. Hypertrophy without widespread degeneration and regeneration during MOV is evidenced by muscle fibre adaptation and growth in the absence of satellite cells [14, 15, 33, 37, 38, 44]. Myonuclei of adult mice (~ 10-month-old) were labelled with GFP prior to a washout period, then muscle was subjected to MOV for 3 or 7 days; sham operated mice served as controls (Fig. 1A). We quantified displaced myonuclei (defined as non-adjacent to the sarcolemma on the interior of the muscle fibre) that were derived from pre-existing resident myonuclei (GFP+) versus those that were acquired from an outside source such as satellite cell fusion (GFP-) during MOV. We delivered 5-Ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) during MOV to quantify DNA synthesis and infer stem cell fate and analysed displaced myonuclei according to myosin heavy chain (MyHC) fibre type and overall fibre size.
Fig. 1.
A Study design where 10-month-old HSA-GFP mice (M/F=6/6) were treated with doxycycline to label myonuclei for 5 days followed by a 14-day wash-out. Synergist ablation mechanical overload (MOV) surgery to overload the plantaris muscle was performed and mice were treated with 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU) in drinking water to assess DNA synthesis during overload. MOV muscles were collected after 3 days (N=4; M/F=2/2) and 7 days (N=4; M/F=2/2) with sham controls collected at 7 days (N=4; M/F=2/2, images not shown). 3-day MOV (B-B’’’’), and 7-day MOV (C-C’’’’) were probed for dystrophin (pink) and DAPI (blue) with GFP resident myonuclei in green and exogenous myonuclei (EdU+/GFP-) in white. Quantification of absolute (number of displaced nuclei per cross-section) and relative (percentage of fibres with one or more displaced myonuclei) number of fibres with GFP+ displaced myonuclei (discernibly within but not adjacent to the dystrophin boarder) is shown in D&E. Data are presented as Mean ± SEM. (*p≤0.05; **p≤0.01,***p≤0.001, ****p≤0.0001; 2-way ANOVA Treatment x Nuclei Label). EdU – 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine, DYS – dystrophin, GFP – green fluorescent protein. White boxes and arrows = EdU+, green boxes and arrows = GFP+
Results and discussion
Displaced myonuclei have differential contributions from resident versus exogenous sources depending on MOV duration
Representative images of GFP+ (EdU-) and EdU + (GFP-) displaced myonuclei (all DAPI+ and within the dystrophin border) were quantified and reported as the absolute number of displaced myonuclei and relative to the total number of fibres per cross-section (585 ± 164, 1058 ± 229, and 1100 ± 78 fibres for sham, 3-day, 7-day respectively), and are shown in Fig. 1B & C (3d & 7 d MOV), 1B-B’’’ (3-day MOV), and 1C-C’’’ (7-day MOV). The increase in fibre number on cross-section with MOV is consistent with what is reported by us and others, and is likely predominantly related to muscle fibre lengthening during MOV [23, 24, 35]. The sham condition was time-matched to the 7-day MOV time point, and average muscle fibre size was similar between groups (sham: 1244 ± 137 um2 and 7-day MOV: 1218 ± 157 um2 average cross-sectional area, CSA; sham: 956 ± 93 um2 and 7-day MOV: 1027 ± 84 um2 non-IIb fibre CSA; sham: 1623 ± 154 um2 and 7-day MOV: 1332 ± 163 um2 IIb fibre CSA, mean ± standard deviation). Displaced myonuclei in the sham condition were very infrequent but almost exclusively GFP+ (images not shown); this means they were resident myonuclei that migrated during the 7 days after sham surgery or, more likely, were already in a non-peripheral location prior to the doxycycline labelling period (Fig. 1D & E).
We found a significantly higher proportion of fibres with displaced myonuclei at 3 days of MOV relative to sham (~ 25 fibres per cross section, or ~ 3% of all fibres, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1D & E). Of those displaced myonuclei after 3 days of MOV, a larger proportion were GFP+ versus EdU+ (Fig. 1D & E). Resident myonuclear migration is therefore an early-emerging feature of the muscle adaptive response to MOV. By 7 days of MOV, the contribution of EdU+ myonuclei (exogenous, presumably from satellite cells) was similar to that of GFP+ displaced myonuclei (~ 20 fibres per cross section of each type, ~ 4% of all fibres, p = 0.009) (Fig. 1D & E). Recent studies show that satellite cells can fuse to muscle fibres during the early phase of MOV without a prior round of cell division [16, 21]. We therefore quantified GFP-/EdU- displaced myonuclei, which could be indicative of direct satellite cell fusion. There were slightly more double-negative events after 3 days of MOV versus sham (Fig. 1D & E). It is possible that GFP-/EdU- displaced myonuclei are attributable to unlabelled resident myonuclei as opposed to direct satellite fusion during MOV, so we also quantified non-displaced (peripheral) GFP-/EdU- myonuclei. Their occurrence was low and accounted for 0.5% of all peripheral myonuclei analyzed on cross-sections (1.1% ± 0.5% sham, 0.4% ± 0.1% 3-day, and 0.2% ± 0.1% 7-day MOV, mean ± standard deviation). The overall number of displaced GFP+/EdU+ myonuclei was negligible across conditions, suggesting that displaced resident myonuclei did not undergo measurable DNA synthesis over a 3-to-7-day MOV duration according to our detection methods. We quantified GFP+/EdU+ peripheral myonuclei in an effort to corroborate a recent report of DNA synthesis in resident myonuclei after MOV [2]. These events were infrequent but detectable (Supplemental Fig. 1). It is worth mentioning that the majority of displaced myonuclei that we observed were not in an anatomically centralized location in the muscle fibre. Perhaps more displaced myonuclei would ultimately assume a central position with longer MOV duration. Centralized myonuclei are classically associated with a satellite cell-mediated regenerative response but could also potentially be related to cell-autonomous muscle healing processes, as described by Roman et al. [54]. Alternatively, myonuclear positioning near the muscle fibre membrane, but not abutting it as we mostly observe here, may be a feature of longitudinal myonuclear movement along the sarcolemma versus transverse movement toward the centre of the fibre. Additional time-resolved experimentation is required to clarify the significance of varied positioning of displaced myonuclei.
Fiber type-specific differences in displaced myonuclei during MOV
Since the plantaris muscle has a mix of MyHC IIb and non-IIb muscle fibres, we determined the occurrence of displaced myonuclei according to adult myosin fibre type. Representative images of fibre type-specific displaced myonuclei after MOV are shown in Fig. 2A & A’ (3d) and 2B&B’ (7d), with the absolute number of displaced myonuclei per fibre type per cross section (Fig. 2C) and relative to the number of IIb + or IIb- fibres (256 ± 118 IIb+ fibres and 330 ± 50 IIb- fibres for sham, 449 ± 208 IIb+ fibres and 563 ± 133 IIb- fibres for 3-day MOV, and 762 ± 203 IIb+ fibres and 501 ± 156 IIb- fibres for 7-day MOV, Fig. 2D). After 3 days of MOV, there was a similar proportion of MyHC IIb+ and IIb- muscle fibres with displaced GFP+ myonuclei (Fig. 2C & D). GFP- displaced myonuclei were lower in proportion relative to GFP+ after 3 days of MOV, but the contribution from both sources was similar in MyHC IIb+ and IIb- fibres (Fig. 2C & D). At 7 days of MOV, MyHC IIb+ fibres had more displaced myonuclei than MyHC IIb- fibres. These data generally align with observations of fibre type-specific sensitivity to loading-induced muscle damage in a given muscle [31, 32, 62], which is perhaps due to ultrastructural differences between fibre types [49]. The relative contribution of GFP+ versus GFP- displaced myonuclei after 7 days of MOV was similar across fibre types (Fig. 2C & D).
Fig. 2.
Immunohistochemical representative images of the plantaris muscle for fibre type-specific quantification of displaced myonuclei for 3-day MOV (A&A’) and 7-day MOV (B&B’). Images show dystrophin (pink), myosin heavy chain IIb (MyHC IIb, red), GFP resident myonuclei (green), and DAPI nuclei (blue). Quantification of displaced myonuclei according to fibre type and condition is reported in C&D with the absolute number of myonuclei per cross-section in panel C and relative number of IIb + or IIb- fibres with one or more displaced myonuclei in panel D. Data are presented as Mean ± SEM and is reported relative to each respective fibre type. (*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001,****p ≤ 0.0001; 2-way ANOVA Treatment x Nuclei Label). MOV – mechanical overload, EdU – 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine, DYS – dystrophin, GFP – green fluorescent protein. Yellow arrows – GFP-, Green arrows – GFP+
The origin of displaced myonuclei during MOV is fibre size-dependent
We next asked whether the appearance of displaced GFP+ versus GFP- myonuclei varied according to muscle fibre size. In sham mice, relatively infrequent GFP+ displaced myonuclei tended to be dispersed across fibre sizes (Fig. 3A & B). At 3 days of MOV, a pattern began to emerge where larger muscle fibres featured displaced GFP+ myonuclei and smaller fibres tended to have displaced GFP- myonuclei (Fig. 3C & D). After 7 days of MOV, it became clear that the largest fibres mostly contained displaced GFP+ myonuclei, and smaller fibres (< 1,000 µm2) tended to have displaced EdU+ myonuclei (Fig. 3E & F). At the 3-day time point, our observations may be driven by displaced EdU+/GFP- myonuclei emerging in inherently smaller MyHC IIa fibres (see Fig. 2). The early stage of muscle regeneration would result in the appearance of smaller calibre fibres with centralized myonuclei, but the 3-day time point is likely too early for muscle fibre regeneration to have progressed appreciably. By 7 days, however, the appearance of smaller muscle fibres with GFP- displaced myonuclei could be the result of nascent muscle fibre formation from a satellite cell-mediated regenerative response that can sometimes occur during MOV. To this point, there was one 7-day MOV sample with the appearance of widespread mononuclear cell infiltration and areas lacking muscle fibres with GFP+ myonuclei (i.e. muscle fibre degeneration), and a high density of EdU+ mononuclear cells in interstitial spaces. Within the infiltrated regions, very small muscle fibres tended to be positive for embryonic myosin heavy chain (eMyHC, a sign of satellite cell-mediated muscle fibre regeneration) and featured GFP-/EdU+ displaced myonuclei (Fig. 4A-A’’’). In the other 7-day MOV muscles (n = 3), less frequent and more regionalized eMyHC+ muscle fibres either contained no displaced myonuclei, or the displaced myonuclei in these fibres were majority EdU+ (Fig. 4B-D). Overall, our data suggest that larger muscle fibres tend to experience resident myonuclear migration (GFP+) that results in displaced myonuclei, whereas smaller and/or regenerating muscle fibres have displaced myonuclei due to stem cell contributions (GFP- or EdU+).
Fig. 3.
Frequency distributions show the occurrences of GFP+ (green) and EdU+ (white) displaced nuclei according to fibre cross sectional area (A, C, E). Panels B, D, & F show these frequencies as a proportion of total fibre counts on entire plantaris cross sections. Data are presented as Mean ± SEM and frequency distributions. (*p ≤ 0.05; 2-way ANOVA Treatment x Nuclei Label). MOV – mechanical overload, EdU – 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine, CSA – cross sectional area, DYS – dystrophin, GFP – green fluorescent protein, MyHC IIb – myosin heavy chain type IIb
Fig. 4.
Image of a 7-day MOV (n = 1) case study of degeneration/regeneration during MOV showing dystrophin (pink), EdU labelled nuclei (white), and DAPI (blue) with GFP resident myonuclei in green (A-A’’). Several fibres in the region of interest (yellow box in A) show displaced GFP+ myonuclei in both eMyHC+ and eMyHC- fibres surrounded by smaller fibres where displaced myonuclei are GFP-. Panels B-D show EdU+ displaced myonuclei occurring in the smaller eMyHC+ fibres of the “normal” 7 d MOV muscles, which emerged in a limited capacity and regionally on the muscle cross-section. eMyHC—embryonic myosin heavy chain
Study limitations
There are limitations to our investigation that should be considered. While GFP labelling in the doxycycline-inducible HSA-GFP model is highly specific to myonuclei, there is very rare off-target labelling of satellite cells [22]. It is possible that GFP+/EdU- displaced myonuclei are the result of errantly labelled GFP+ satellite cells, and that these same cells were the ones that fuse without a prior division (thus lacking EdU) [16, 21]. However, the overall abundance of GFP+/EdU- displaced myonuclei in context with the similar abundance of GFP-/EdU+ displaced myonuclei makes a potentially small amount off-target satellite cell labelling an unlikely explanation for the appearance of all displaced GFP+ myonuclei. We delivered EdU in drinking water to identify DNA synthesis and cell fate. The half-life of EdU in rodents in vivo is short (a matter of hours) [58]. A more rigorous approach that would label more EdU+ events is to use a mini osmotic pump that delivers EdU continuously throughout MOV [16, 21]. Recent evidence suggests that resident myonuclei can synthesize DNA, and that myonuclear DNA synthesis is elevated during MOV [2, 3]. The usage of a mini osmotic pump approach to deliver EdU could potentially capture DNA synthesis in displaced resident myonuclei provided off-target GFP labelling of satellite cells or alternative progenitors [10, 13, 30, 34]—followed by proliferation and fusion—does not explain the result. Notwithstanding, a preponderance of EdU+ events in regenerating areas of muscle during MOV in our experiments (see Fig. 4A-A’’) confirms that our labelling was robust. The proportion of muscle fibres with displaced myonuclei is relatively low in the MOV condition (up to 4% of all fibres), but it is important to consider that our analyses were performed on 7 µm sections. If extrapolated to the entire length of the plantaris muscle, this would equate to an appreciable number of displaced myonuclei.
Perspectives
We previously associated the appearance of a displaced myonucleus – in the absence of an overt regenerative response – to the occurrence of what appeared to be fibre “splitting” during MOV [44]. A provocative hypothesis is that displaced resident (non-stem cell-derived) myonuclei could be a biomarker for, or even a contributor to the rare “splitting” of an adult muscle fibre that might occur during MOV [35]. An alternative explanation for displaced resident myonuclei as an indicator of fibre splitting in adult muscle fibres is that these myonuclei mark the point of recent fibre fusion event between branched and parent sarcolemma [20]. This interpretation aligns with the possibility of “myocyte grafting” that may occur with MOV – distinct from de novo fibre splitting – but would also involve satellite cell contributions [35]. Future investigations may further explore these possibilities.
The results from the current study build on our preliminary observations of displaced resident myonuclei with muscle damage in the soleus muscle [41] and provide new perspectives on the source, timing, myosin type, and size characteristics of fibres containing non-peripheral myonuclei in adult muscle fibres. Given the role resident myonuclear migration plays in muscle fibre membrane repair [1, 53, 54], our work provides rationale to study the origin and function of displaced myonuclei across different conditions such as muscle disease and aging. This work may also encourage a re-evaluation of the classification of regenerating muscle fibres based solely on centralized or internalized myonuclear placement [17]. The molecular characteristics of resident versus exogenous displaced myonuclei should also be explored. Resident displaced myonuclei during MOV could be the same transcriptionally unique myonuclei that emerge during MOV in single myonucleus RNA-sequencing data and are enriched for Atf3 and muscle repair and sarcomere assembly-related markers such as Flnc, Enah, and Ankrd1 [26, 59]. These myonuclei share some of the transcriptional features of migrating resident myonuclei described previously – specifically enrichment for Flnc [54] – and are not derived from satellite cells [26, 59]. More granular information on the source and function of displaced myonuclei in adult skeletal muscle could further illuminate etiology and treatment approaches for muscle damage and pathology, as well as myonuclear contributions to exercise adaptation [27, 39].
Methods
Ethical approval
All animal procedures were approved by the IACUC of the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. The human skeletal actin reverse tetracycline transactivator tetracycline response element histone 2b green fluorescent protein (HSA-GFP) mice were generated by our laboratory. Mouse pups were genotyped as previously described [22]. Mice were housed in a temperature and humidity-controlled facility with 12:12 h light–dark cycle with food and water provided ad libitum. Animals were sacrificed by being placed under general anaesthesia with isoflurane followed by cervical dislocation.
Experimental design
The experimental design is illustrated in Fig. 1A. 10 month old mice (N = 12; M/F = 6/6) were assigned to either a 3- (n = 4; M/F = 2/2) or 7-day MOV (n = 4; M/F = 2/2) protocol with a 7-day time matched sham group (Sham) (n = 4; M/F = 2/2). One 7-day MOV mouse had the appearance of overt degeneration/regeneration and was treated as a “case study”, separate from the rest of the group (see Fig. 4) and not included in other analyses. Mice were treated with 0.5 mg/ml doxycycline and 2% sucrose for 5 days in drinking water to fluorescently label resident myonuclei. After a 14-day washout period, mice underwent synergist ablation mechanical overload surgery where the lower 2/3 of the gastrocnemius and soleus complex were removed. Mice returned to normal ambulation within ~ 24 h. At the time of MOV surgery, mice were delivered an intraperitoneal “priming dose” of EdU (~ 2 mg in water), then given 0.5 mg/ml EdU (Biosynth, NE08701) with 2% sucrose in drinking water that was refreshed every other day, similar to our prior approach [41].
Histology/Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out on whole plantaris muscles after embedding in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound and snap freezing in liquid nitrogen chilled isopentane as previously described by us using appropriate antibodies [41]. For assessment of displaced nuclei, plantaris muscles were cryosectioned at 7 µm on a Epredia Cryostar NX50 Cryostat and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized in 0.5% Triton-X. EdU detection was carried out with CLICK-iT detection buffer for 30 min that contained 100 mM Tris, 5 mM Copper Sulphate, 100 mM ascorbic acid, and TAMRA-Azide (Vector, CCT-AZ109-1). Anti-dystrophin primary was then applied and an appropriate secondary antibody followed by DAPI prior to mounting and imaging. For fibre type assessments, sections were incubated in primaries for MyHC IIb (BF-F3, DSHB) and dystrophin then the appropriate secondary antibodies (isotype-specific for MyHC IIb) before applying DAPI. Displaced myonuclei were defined as myonuclei that are not adjacent to the sarcolemma (dystrophin) and manually assessed in Zen software.
Embryonic Myosin Heavy Chain (eMyHC) immunohistochemistry
Separate sections were blocked with 10% normal horse serum and 1% BSA in PBS for 30 min at room temperature before applying eMyHC (F1.652, DSHB) and dystrophin primary antibody incubated at 4 °C. Secondary antibody was then applied before post-fixing in 4% PFA and continuing with EdU detection as described in the previous section.
Image capture and analysis
All images were captured using an upright fluorescent microscope at 20X magnification (Zeiss Axiolmager M2, Oberkochen, Germany) where whole muscle sections were imaged using the mosaic function in Zeiss Zen 3.8.3 for Microsoft. Muscle fibre counts on whole muscle sections were assessed in MyoVision semi-automated analysis software [61, 65]. Displaced myonuclei and GFP+/EdU + and GFP-/EdU- peripheral myonuclei were manually counted in Zen software and fibres with displaced nuclei were then manually assessed for cross-sectional area (CSA) using the fibre tracing tool as well as fibre type. Total myonuclear number was also assessed using MyoVision.
Statistics
Displaced nuclei counts were analysed using GraphPad statistical software (Prism, version 10.6.0 for Windows). A 2-way ANOVA was performed on the GFP+, EdU+, GFP+/EdU+, and GFP-/EdU- displaced myonuclear counts per section and the percentage of nuclei relative to total fibre counts with a Tukey’s post hoc correction. A separate 2-way ANOVA on the displaced myonuclei per fibre type (type IIb vs non-IIb) with a tukey’s post hoc correction and significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Finally, frequency distributions were collected and incrementally binned using the manually traced fibre CSA data from the Zeiss Zen software and personalized Excel macros. All figures were created using GraphPad.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Material 1. Supplemental Figure 1. Images from 3-day (A-A”) and 7-day (B-B”) MOV showing GFP+/EdU+ peripheral myonuclei, indicating DNA synthesis in resident myonuclei. Peripheral GFP+/EdU+ myonuclei are shown in yellow boxes
Acknowledgements
Thank you to Cory Dungan, PhD, of Baylor University for helpful discussions regarding EdU detection. F1.652 was deposited to the DSHB by Blau, H.M. (DSHB Hybridoma Product F1.652). BF-F3 was deposited to the DSHB by Schiaffino, S. (DSHB Hybridoma Product BF-F3).
Authors’ contributions
N.S. and K.A.M. designed the study. All authors contributed to executing the study procedures. N.S. collected data and performed the analysis. N.S. and K.A.M. prepared the manuscript text and figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by NIH R01 AG080047 and K02 AG088465 to KAM.
Data availability
Data can be made available with a reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Nathan Serrano, Email: ns097@uark.edu.
Kevin A. Murach, Email: kmurach@uark.edu
References
- 1.Bagley JR, Denes LT, McCarthy JJ, Wang ET, Murach KA. The myonuclear domain in adult skeletal muscle fibres: past, present and future. J Physiol. 2023;601:723–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Borowik AK, Davidyan A, Frederick F, Peelor I, Voloviceva E, DGE S, Bubak MP, Mobley CB, Mccarthy JJ, Dupont-Versteegden EE, Miller BF. Skeletal muscle nuclei in mice are not post-mitotic. Function. 2022;4:zqac059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Borowik AK, Murach KA, Miller BF. The expanding roles of myonuclei in adult skeletal muscle health and function. Biochem Soc Trans. 2024;52:2603–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Buckley KH, Nestor-Kalinoski AL, Pizza FX. Positional context of myonuclear transcription during injury-induced muscle regeneration. Front Physiol. 2022. 10.3389/fphys.2022.845504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burke BI, Ismaeel A, McCarthy JJ. The utility of the rodent synergist ablation model in identifying molecular and cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2024;327:C601-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Burke BI, Ismaeel A, von Walden F, Murach KA, McCarthy JJ. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy: cell growth is cell growth. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2024;327:C614-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Castellano L, Caillol D, Streichenberger N, Gache V. Interplay between microtubule interactome, myonuclei mechanotransduction, and positioning in myopathies. Nucleus. 2025;16:2524909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cristea A, Qaisar R, Edlund PK, Lindblad J, Bengtsson E, Larsson L. Effects of aging and gender on the spatial organization of nuclei in single human skeletal muscle cells. Aging Cell. 2010;9:685–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Daou N, Hassani M, Matos E, De Castro GS, Galvao Figueredo Costa R, Seelaender M, et al. Displaced myonuclei in cancer cachexia suggest altered innervation. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dellavalle A, Maroli G, Covarello D, Azzoni E, Innocenzi A, Perani L, et al. Pericytes resident in postnatal skeletal muscle differentiate into muscle fibres and generate satellite cells. Nat Commun. 2011;2:499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dungan CM, Figueiredo VC, Wen Y, Vonlehmden GL, Zdunek CJ, Thomas NT, et al. Senolytic treatment rescues blunted muscle hypertrophy in old mice. GeroScience. 2022. 10.1007/s11357-022-00542-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dungan CM, Murach KA, Frick KK, Jones SR, Crow SE, Englund DA, et al. Elevated myonuclear density during skeletal muscle hypertrophy in response to training is reversed during detraining. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2019;316:C649–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Flynn CG, Ginkel PRV, Hubert KA, Guo Q, Hrycaj SM, Mcdermott AE, et al. Hox11-expressing interstitial cells contribute to adult skeletal muscle at homeostasis. Development. 2023;150:dev201026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fry CS, Kirby TJ, Kosmac K, McCarthy JJ, Peterson CA. Myogenic progenitor cells control extracellular matrix production by fibroblasts during skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20:56–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fry CS, Lee JD, Jackson JR, Kirby TJ, Stasko SA, Liu H, et al. Regulation of the muscle fiber microenvironment by activated satellite cells during hypertrophy. FASEB J. 2014;28:1654–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goh J, Williams JG, Ogle SE, Joshi JK, Scott LN, Burke BI, Keeble AR, Thomas NT, Fry CS, Ismaeel A. Skeletal muscle stem cell mitochondria are transferred to muscle fibers in response to a hypertrophic stimulus. Function. 2025;6:zqaf031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Grounds MD. The need to more precisely define aspects of skeletal muscle regeneration. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;56:56–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hansson K-A, Solbrå AV, Gundersen K, Bruusgaard JC. Computational assessment of transport distances in living skeletal muscle fibers studied in situ. Biophys J. 2020;119:2166–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hastings RL, Massopust RT, Haddix SG, Lee YI, Thompson WJ. Exclusive vital labeling of myonuclei for studying myonuclear arrangement in mouse skeletal muscle tissue. Skelet Muscle. 2020;10:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Højfeldt G, Sorenson T, Gonzales A, Kjaer M, Andersen JL, Mackey AL. Fusion of myofibre branches is a physiological feature of healthy human skeletal muscle regeneration. Skelet Muscle. 2023;13:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ismaeel A, Goh J, Mobley CB, Murach KA, Brett JO, de Morrée A, et al. Division-independent differentiation of muscle stem cells during a growth stimulus. Stem Cells. 2024;42:266–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Iwata M, Englund DA, Wen Y, Dungan CM, Murach KA, Vechetti IJ, et al. A novel tetracycline-responsive transgenic mouse strain for skeletal muscle-specific gene expression. Skeletal Muscle. 2018;8:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jorgenson KW, Hornberger TA. The overlooked role of fiber length in mechanical load-induced growth of skeletal muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2019;47:258–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jorgenson KW, Phillips SM, Hornberger TA. Identifying the structural adaptations that drive the mechanical load-induced growth of skeletal muscle: a scoping review. Cells. 2020;9:1658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Konopka AR, Castor WM, Wolff CA, Musci RV, Reid JJ, Laurin JL, et al. Skeletal muscle mitochondrial protein synthesis and respiration in response to the energetic stress of an ultra-endurance race. J Appl Physiol. 2017;123:1516–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Koopmans PJ, Jones RG, Cabrera AR, Morena F, Greene NP, Mccarthy JJ, et al. The age-dependent resident myonuclear multi-omic response to a skeletal muscle hypertrophic stimulus. bioRxiv. 2025:2025.10. 29.685384.
- 27.Koopmans PJ, Zwetsloot KA, Murach KA. Going nuclear: Molecular adaptations to exercise mediated by myonuclei. Sports Med Health Sci. 202;5:2–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Korb A, Tajbakhsh S, Comai GE. Functional specialisation and coordination of myonuclei. Biol Rev. 2024;99:1164–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lepper C, Partridge TA, Fan C-M. An absolute requirement for Pax7-positive satellite cells in acute injury-induced skeletal muscle regeneration. Development. 2011;138:3639–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu N, Garry GA, Li S, Bezprozvannaya S, Sanchez-Ortiz E, Chen B, et al. A Twist2-dependent progenitor cell contributes to adult skeletal muscle. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19:202–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lloyd EM, Pinniger GJ, Murphy RM, Grounds MD. Slow or fast: implications of myofibre type and associated differences for manifestation of neuromuscular disorders. Acta Physiol. 2023;238:e14012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Macaluso F, Isaacs AW, Myburgh KH. Preferential type II muscle fiber damage from plyometric exercise. J Athl Train. 2012;47:414–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.McCarthy JJ, Mula J, Miyazaki M, Erfani R, Garrison K, Farooqui AB, et al. Effective fiber hypertrophy in satellite cell-depleted skeletal muscle. Development. 2011;138:3657–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mitchell KJ, Pannérec A, Cadot B, Parlakian A, Besson V, Gomes ER, et al. Identification and characterization of a non-satellite cell muscle resident progenitor during postnatal development. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:257–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Murach KA, Dungan CM, Peterson CA, McCarthy JJ. Muscle fiber splitting is a physiological response to extreme loading in animals. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2019;47:108–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Murach KA, Dungan CM, Von Walden F, Wen Y. Epigenetic evidence for distinct contributions of resident and acquired myonuclei during long-rerm exercise adaptation using timed in vivo myonuclear labeling. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2021;32:C86-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Murach KA, Fry CS, Dupont-Versteegden EE, Mccarthy JJ, Peterson CA. Fusion and beyond: satellite cell contributions to loading-induced skeletal muscle adaptation. FASEB J. 2021;35:e21893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Murach KA, Fry CS, Kirby TJ, Jackson JR, Lee JD, White SH, et al. Starring or supporting role? Satellite cells and skeletal muscle fiber size regulation. Physiology (Bethesda). 2018;33:26–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Murach KA, Liu Z, Jude B, Figueiredo VC, Wen Y, Khadgi S, et al. Multi-transcriptome analysis following an acute skeletal muscle growth stimulus yields tools for discerning global and MYC regulatory networks. J Biol Chem. 2022;298:102515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Murach KA, McCarthy JJ, Peterson CA, Dungan CM. Making mice mighty: recent advances in translational models of load-induced muscle hypertrophy. J Appl Physiol. 2020;129:516–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Murach KA, Mobley CB, Zdunek CJ, Frick KK, Jones SR, Mccarthy JJ, et al. Muscle memory: myonuclear accretion, maintenance, morphology, and miRNA levels with training and detraining in adult mice. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020. 10.1002/jcsm.12617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Murach KA, Peck BD, Policastro RA, Vechetti IJ, van Pelt DW, Dungan CM, et al. Early satellite cell communication creates a permissive environment for long-term muscle growth. iScience. 2021;24:102372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Murach KA, Vechetti JR, I. J, Van Pelt DW, Crow SE, Dungan CM, et al. Fusion-independent satellite cell communication to muscle fibers during load-induced hypertrophy. Function. 2020;1:zqaa009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Murach KA, White SH, Wen Y, Ho A, Dupont-Versteegden EE, Mccarthy JJ, et al. Differential requirement for satellite cells during overload-induced muscle hypertrophy in growing versus mature mice. Skelet Muscle. 2017. 10.1186/s13395-017-0132-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Murphy MM, Lawson JA, Mathew SJ, Hutcheson DA, Kardon G. Satellite cells, connective tissue fibroblasts and their interactions are crucial for muscle regeneration. Development. 2011;138:3625–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nolt GL, Keeble AR, Wen Y, Strong AC, Thomas NT, Valentino TR, et al. Inhibition of p53-MDM2 binding reduces senescent cell abundance and improves the adaptive responses of skeletal muscle from aged mice. Geroscience. 2023;46(2):2153–76. 10.1007/s11357-023-00976-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Padilla JR, Qiu Y, Kimmel G, Aleck G, Ferreira L, Wu S, et al. Dystrophin interacts with Msp300 to regulate myonuclear positioning and microtubule organization. J Cell Sci. 2025;138:jcs263712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pizza FX, Buckley KH. Regenerating myofibers after an acute muscle injury: what do we really know about them? Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:12545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Qaisar R, Bhaskaran S, van Remmen H. Muscle fiber type diversification during exercise and regeneration. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016;98:56–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ralston E, Lu Z, Biscocho N, Soumaka E, Mavroidis M, Prats C, et al. Blood vessels and desmin control the positioning of nuclei in skeletal muscle fibers. J Cell Physiol. 2006;209:874–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Roman W, Gomes ER. Nuclear positioning in skeletal muscle. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;82:51–56. Elsevier. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 52.Roman W, Martins JP, Carvalho FA, Voituriez R, Abella JV, Santos NC, et al. Myofibril contraction and crosslinking drive nuclear movement to the periphery of skeletal muscle. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19:1189–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Roman W, Muñoz-Cánoves P. Muscle is a stage, and cells and factors are merely players. Trends Cell Biol. 2022. 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Roman W, Pinheiro H, Pimentel MR, Segalés J, Oliveira LM, García-Domínguez E, et al. Muscle repair after physiological damage relies on nuclear migration for cellular reconstruction. Science. 2021;374:355–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Roth SM, Martel GF, Ivey FM, Lemmer JT, Metter EJ, Hurley BF, et al. Skeletal muscle satellite cell populations in healthy young and older men and women. Anat Rec. 2000;260:351–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sambasivan R, Yao R, Kissenpfennig A, van Wittenberghe L, Paldi A, Gayraud-Morel B, et al. Pax7-expressing satellite cells are indispensable for adult skeletal muscle regeneration. Development. 2011;138:3647–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sequeira C, Wackerbarth LM, Pena A, Sá-Pereira M, Franco CA, Gomes ER. Myonuclear position and blood vessel organization during skeletal muscle postnatal development. Development. 2024;151:dev202548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Solius GM, Maltsev DI, Belousov VV, Podgorny OV. Recent advances in nucleotide analogue-based techniques for tracking dividing stem cells: an overview. J Biol Chem. 2021. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sun C, Swoboda CO, Morales FM, Calvo C, Petrany MJ, Parameswaran S, et al. Lineage tracing of nuclei in skeletal myofibers uncovers distinct transcripts and interplay between myonuclear populations. Nat Commun. 2024;15:9372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Van Ingen MJ, Kirby TJ. LINCing nuclear mechanobiology with skeletal muscle mass and function. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:690577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Viggars MR, Wen Y, Peterson CA, Jarvis JC. Automated cross-sectional analysis of trained, severely atrophied, and recovering rat skeletal muscles using MyoVision 2.0. J Appl Physiol. 2022;132:593–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Vijayan K, Thompson JL, Norenberg KM, Fitts R, Riley DA. Fiber-type susceptibility to eccentric contraction-induced damage of hindlimb-unloaded rat AL muscles. J Appl Physiol. 2001;90:770–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Von Walden F, Rea M, Mobley CB, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Mccarthy JJ, Peterson CA, et al. The myonuclear DNA methylome in response to an acute hypertrophic stimulus. Epigenetics. 2020;15:1151–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wen Y, Dungan CM, Mobley CB, Valentino T, Von Walden F, Murach KA. Nucleus type-specific dna methylomics reveals epigenetic “Memory” of Prior adaptation in skeletal muscle. Function. 2021;2:zqab038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 65.Wen Y, Murach KA, Vechetti IJJR, Fry CS, Vickery CD, Peterson CA, et al. Myovision: software for automated high-content analysis of skeletal muscle immunohistochemistry. J Appl Physiol. 2017;124:40–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zampieri S, Doria A, Adami N, Biral D, Vecchiato M, Savastano S, et al. Subclinical myopathy in patients affected with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer at clinical onset of disease: evidence from skeletal muscle biopsies. Neurol Res. 2010;32:20–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material 1. Supplemental Figure 1. Images from 3-day (A-A”) and 7-day (B-B”) MOV showing GFP+/EdU+ peripheral myonuclei, indicating DNA synthesis in resident myonuclei. Peripheral GFP+/EdU+ myonuclei are shown in yellow boxes
Data Availability Statement
Data can be made available with a reasonable request to the corresponding author.




