Abstract
We compared questionnaire and choice measures of acceptability while evaluating effects of staff familiarity versus unfamiliarity with the system used to monitor performance during a training program. Staff members rated both monitoring formats equally favorably on the questionnaire, whereas when given a choice, they frequently chose the familiar format and never chose the unfamiliar format. These results suggest that traditional questionnaire evaluations may not be sufficiently sensitive measures of acceptability relative to choice measures.
Keywords: acceptability, choice, staff training, organizational behavior management, questionnaires
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a88b6/a88b6c8bbef7c262c2d6684e7ebe831df7b4f2c9" alt="95"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/562da/562da9cc51b3d0153dbd422e9cce627c1afbffc4" alt="96"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Schwartz I. S., Baer D. M. Social validity assessments: is current practice state of the art? J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Summer;24(2):189–204. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]