Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2025 Nov 24;15(1):e00920-25. doi: 10.1128/mra.00920-25

Draft genome sequence of Agathobacter rectalis H10.1 isolated from the feces of a child with ulcerative colitis in remission

Sasanka Weerasingha 1,2, David R Mack 3,4, Alain Stintzi 1,2,
Editor: Zhenjiang Zech Xu5
PMCID: PMC12797983  PMID: 41277832

ABSTRACT

Agathobacter rectalis is a beneficial gut bacterium, known to produce butyrate and thereby enhance gut health. Here, we report the draft genome sequence of A. rectalis strain H10.1 isolated from the feces of an individual with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission.

KEYWORDS: Agathobacter, ulcerative colitis

ANNOUNCEMENT

Agathobacter (Eubacterium) rectalis plays a crucial role in colonic resistant starch (RS) fermentation by converting starch breakdown products generated by other bacteria into short-chain fatty acids, especially butyrate (1). A. rectalis relative abundance is reduced in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as compared to healthy individuals (2). An A. rectalis strain was isolated from a fecal sample collected from a participant with the IBD subtype ulcerative colitis in clinical remission. Sample collection was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (REB#20/16E). Following consent, stool was collected at home by the participant and returned to the laboratory in a deoxygenated sterile buffer (1× PBS + 10% wt/vol glycerol, 0.1% wt/vol l-cysteine hydrochloride, pH 7.6). The sample was homogenized to a 20% wt/vol stool slurry, non-bacterial debris was removed by centrifugation, and aliquots were stored at −80°C (3, 4). Bacterial isolation consisted of incubating 300 µL stool slurry anaerobically (5% CO2, 5% H2, and 90% N2) in 1 mL basal medium (5) supplemented with 1.5% ActiStar RT for 4 h at 37°C. After incubation, RS-associated bacteria were isolated as previously described (6). Briefly, the RS-granules underwent multiple cycles of centrifugation at 700 × g followed by PBS washes to isolate bacteria specifically attaching to RS-granules. The washed RS-pellet was resuspended in sterile PBS, vortexed, plated on ATCC medium 1703 plates, and incubated anaerobically for 24 h at 37°C. A single colony was picked and purified using three successive isolation streaks on ATCC medium 1703 agar plates under the same conditions and designated as strain H10.1.

The purified H10.1 strain was cultured anaerobically in ATCC medium 1703 broth at 37°C and genomic DNA was extracted using a Quick-DNA HMW kit (ZymoBIOMICS, D6060) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Unsheared and non-size-selected DNA was used to generate tagmentation libraries in technical triplicate with a Rapid Barcoding Kit (ONT, SQK-RBK114-24) and sequenced on a MinION using a single flow cell (ONT, FLO-MIN114) for 72 h. Subsequent bioinformatic analyses used the default parameters for each program unless otherwise noted. Raw reads were base-called, adapter-trimmed, and demultiplexed using Dorado (v0.9.2, https://github.com/nanoporetech/dorado) with the high accuracy (hac) model to reduce errors. Low-quality reads (Q-score < 8) were discarded. The technical replicates were merged, and a total of 370,004 reads (N50 = 6,800 bp) used for de-novo assembly with Flye (v2.9.3-b1797) (7) employing Flye’s built-in error correction module. The draft genome was polished using Medaka (v1.8.1), and the assembly quality was evaluated with QUAST (v5.0.2) (8). Genome completeness was assessed with BUSCO (v5.8.2_cv1) (9).

H10.1’s draft genome consists of four contigs as summarized in Table 1. Genome annotation using NCBI’s prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline (v6.10) (10) revealed 2,966 protein-coding sequences, 78 RNA genes (15 rRNAs, 59 tRNAs, and 4 ncRNAs), and 97 pseudogenes. H10.1 was confirmed as A. rectalis with FastANI (v1.34) (11) and shared 96.88% nucleotide identity with the A. rectalis ATCC33656 reference genome (NC_012781.1). H10.1’s phylogeny was verified using whole genome taxonomy-based analysis in Type (Strain) Genome Server (12) and visualized using iTOL (v6) (13) (Fig. 1).

TABLE 1.

Basic genomic features of the Agathobacter rectalis H10.1

Parameter Value
Genome size (bp) 3,233,719
No. of contigs 4
Largest contig (bp) 3,222,615
N 50 3,222,615
GC (%) 41.93
Mean coverage 303
BUSCO completeness (%) 97.1

Fig 1.

Phylogenetic tree compares Agathobacter rectalis strains and related species using genomic sequence similarity. Flavonifractor plautii serves as outgroup, with Agathobacter rectalis H10.1 grouped within main cluster of closely related isolates.

Phylogenetic tree of Agathobacter rectalis H10.1 and Agathobacter rectalis strains. Tree inferred with FastME 2.1.6.1 (14) from Genome BLAST Distance Phylogeny (GBDP) distances calculated from genome sequences with Flavonifractor plautii as an outgroup. The branch lengths are scaled in terms of GBDP distance formula d5. The numbers above branches are GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values >60% from 100 replications, with an average branch support of 22.8%. The tree was rooted at the midpoint (15).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Ontario Genomics Institute (OGI-149), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (ECD-144627), and the Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation (Project 13440). This research was enabled by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada (alliancecan.ca) (RRG #5010).

Contributor Information

Alain Stintzi, Email: astintzi@uottawa.ca.

Zhenjiang Zech Xu, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The BioProject for A. rectalis H10.1 is PRJNA1276980. Raw sequencing reads from the three technical replicates are available in the Sequence Read Archive under accessions SRR34286650, SRR34286649, and SRR34286651. The GenBank accession of the H10.1 draft genome is JBPDJD000000000.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Shetty SA, Kuipers B, Atashgahi S, Aalvink S, Smidt H, de Vos WM. 2022. Inter-species metabolic interactions in an in-vitro minimal human gut microbiome of core bacteria. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 8:21. doi: 10.1038/s41522-022-00275-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Vermeiren J, Van den Abbeele P, Laukens D, Vigsnaes LK, De Vos M, Boon N, Van de Wiele T. 2012. Decreased colonization of fecal Clostridium coccoides/Eubacterium rectale species from ulcerative colitis patients in an in vitro dynamic gut model with mucin environment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 79:685–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01252.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhang X, Walker K, Mayne J, Li L, Ning Z, Stintzi A, Figeys D. 2022. Evaluating live microbiota biobanking using an ex vivo microbiome assay and metaproteomics. Gut Microbes 14:2035658. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2035658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Li L, Mayne J, Beltran A, Zhang X, Ning Z, Figeys D. 2024. RapidAIM 2.0: a high-throughput assay to study functional response of human gut microbiome to xenobiotics. Microbiome Res Rep 3. doi: 10.20517/mrr.2023.57 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sanz ML, Gibson GR, Rastall RA. 2005. Influence of disaccharide structure on prebiotic selectivity in vitro. J Agric Food Chem 53:5192–5199. doi: 10.1021/jf050276w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Leitch ECMW, Walker AW, Duncan SH, Holtrop G, Flint HJ. 2007. Selective colonization of insoluble substrates by human faecal bacteria. Environ Microbiol 9:667–679. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01186.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler GQ. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simão FA, Zdobnov EM. 2021. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol 38:4647–4654. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. 2022. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D801–D807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Letunic I, Bork P. 2024. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 52:W78–W82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. 2015. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 32:2798–2800. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Farris JS. 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 106:645–668. doi: 10.1086/282802 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The BioProject for A. rectalis H10.1 is PRJNA1276980. Raw sequencing reads from the three technical replicates are available in the Sequence Read Archive under accessions SRR34286650, SRR34286649, and SRR34286651. The GenBank accession of the H10.1 draft genome is JBPDJD000000000.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES