Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1995 Fall;28(3):245–260. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-245

The costs of eating: a behavioral economic analysis of food refusal.

M E Kerwin 1, W H Ahearn 1, P S Eicher 1, D M Burd 1
PMCID: PMC1279823  PMID: 7592142

Abstract

Behavioral economic concepts were applied to the analysis and treatment of pediatric feeding disorders in a clinical setting. In Experiment 1, children who chronically refused food were presented with varying amounts of food on a spoon (empty, dipped, quarter, half, and level). Each child exhibited a different but orderly demand function of response (acceptance, expulsion, and mouth clean) by cost (increasing spoon volume) for a constant pay-off of toys and social interaction. In Experiment 2, physical guidance or nonremoval of the spoon for food refusal was initiated at the smallest spoon volume with low levels of acceptance, and was subsequently introduced at the largest spoon volume with moderate levels of acceptance. Treatment was effective in increasing acceptance, and these effects generalized hierarchically across untargeted spoon volumes. The results of both studies provide preliminary support that increasing spoon volume can be equated conceptually with increasing response effort, and that the change from differential reinforcement to physical guidance or nonremoval of the spoon appears to have altered the elasticity of each child's demand function.

Full text

PDF
245

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Babbitt R. L., Hoch T. A., Coe D. A., Cataldo M. F., Kelly K. J., Stackhouse C., Perman J. A. Behavioral assessment and treatment of pediatric feeding disorders. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1994 Aug;15(4):278–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum W. M. The correlation-based law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):137–153. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brener J., Mitchell S. Changes in energy expenditure and work during response acquisition in rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989 Apr;15(2):166–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Budd K. S., McGraw T. E., Farbisz R., Murphy T. B., Hawkins D., Heilman N., Werle M., Hochstadt N. J. Psychosocial concomitants of children's feeding disorders. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992 Feb;17(1):81–94. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/17.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CHUNG S. H. EFFECTS OF EFFORT ON RESPONSE RATE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Jan;8:1–7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collier G., Hirsch E., Hamlin P. H. The ecological determinants of reinforcement in the rat. Physiol Behav. 1972 Nov-Dec;9(5):705–716. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(72)90038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fisher W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Hagopian L. P., Langdon N. A. Empirically derived consequences: a data-based method for prescribing treatments for destructive behavior. Res Dev Disabil. 1994 Mar-Apr;15(2):133–149. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(94)90018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foltin R. W. Economic analysis of the effects of caloric alternatives and reinforcer magnitude on "demand" for food in baboons. Appetite. 1992 Dec;19(3):255–271. doi: 10.1016/0195-6663(92)90166-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Geertsma M. A., Hyams J. S., Pelletier J. M., Reiter S. Feeding resistance after parenteral hyperalimentation. Am J Dis Child. 1985 Mar;139(3):255–256. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1985.02140050049020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goltz S. M. A sequential learning analysis of decisions in organizations to escalate investments despite continuing costs or losses. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Fall;25(3):561–574. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoch T., Babbitt R. L., Coe D. A., Krell D. M., Hackbert L. Contingency contacting. Combining positive reinforcement and escape extinction procedures to treat persistent food refusal. Behav Modif. 1994 Jan;18(1):106–128. doi: 10.1177/01454455940181007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hursh S. R. Behavioral economics. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):435–452. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hursh S. R. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):219–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hursh S. R. The economics of daily consumption controlling food- and water-reinforced responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):475–491. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hyman S. L., Coyle J. T., Parke J. C., Porter C., Thomas G. H., Jankel W., Batshaw M. L. Anorexia and altered serotonin metabolism in a patient with argininosuccinic aciduria. J Pediatr. 1986 May;108(5 Pt 1):705–709. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)81046-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. ILLINGWORTH R. S., LISTER J. THE CRITICAL OR SENSITIVE PERIOD, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CERTAIN FEEDING PROBLEMS IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN. J Pediatr. 1964 Dec;65:839–848. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(64)80006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Iwata B. A. Negative reinforcement in applied behavior analysis: an emerging technology. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Winter;20(4):361–378. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kagel J. H., Winkler R. C. Behavioral economics: areas of cooperative research between economics and applied behavioral analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Fall;5(3):335–342. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McDowell J. J., Wood H. M. Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Rate of change of Herrnstein's kappa as a function of response-force requirement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):61–73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Michael J. Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):149–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miller L. K. Some punishing effects of response-force. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):215–220. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mintz D. E., Samuels R. M., Barber N. G. Force and rate relations in responding during variable-interval reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):387–393. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Neef N. A., Shade D., Miller M. S. Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):575–583. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pace G. M., Ivancic M. T., Edwards G. L., Iwata B. A., Page T. J. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249–255. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Riordan M. M., Iwata B. A., Finney J. W., Wohl M. K., Stanley A. E. Behavioral assessment and treatment of chronic food refusal in handicapped children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;17(3):327–341. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES