Abstract
Assessment and treatment of covert self-injurious behavior are complicated because it is difficult to quantify and apply differential consequences to covert responses. In this study, both tangible and social reinforcers were identified using reinforcer assessment methods. These reinforcers were then provided contingent upon the absence of tissue damage identified during physical examinations, resulting in near 100% success in physical assessment checks that was maintained over 10 months.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0f0a/f0f0a089c832deb1f0d69cbda3ee20f3ff410b23" alt="239"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc9b1/bc9b1fa5f436997997243aa863e341e57c98b287" alt="240"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5caa/f5caaf9f884891f3430e32b7c45b235f4b34231b" alt="241"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f524/7f524f54704384030eef4f67c6d7850108d08fd5" alt="242"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Fisher W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Hagopian L. P., Owens J. C., Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491–498. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]