Skip to main content
Thieme Open Access logoLink to Thieme Open Access
. 2026 Jan 13;58(Suppl 1):E53–E54. doi: 10.1055/a-2760-9595

A novel robotic traction system for endoscopic submucosal dissection – achieving en bloc resection of an extensive laterally spreading tumor in the lower rectum

Zhiyong Zhai 1,2, Chongju Bao 1,2, Wanjun Li 1,2, Chao Yang 1,2, Wei Gong 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12799310  PMID: 41529714

Colonoscopy revealed a 5.5 × 4.0 cm laterally spreading tumor in the lower rectum near the anal verge, with a well-demarcated line and relatively regular nodules ( Fig. 1 ). Indigo carmine staining displayed a glandular pattern consistent with Kudo type IV pits ( Fig. 2 ), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was deemed feasible.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A laterally spreading tumor (5.5 cm × 4.0 cm) with Parisian Type 0-IIa in the lower rectum.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Indigo carmine staining displayed a glandular pattern consistent with Kudo type IV pits.

Given the lesion’s large size, location in the lower rectum, and rich vascularity, submucosal layer visualization was expected to be suboptimal during dissection, elevating the risks of intraoperative bleeding and incomplete resection. To overcome these challenges, the EndoFaster robotic traction system was employed ( Fig. 3 ). Following submucosal injection and circumferential mucosa incision using a hybrid knife, the device’s white soft hood was attached to the endoscope tip. Grasping forceps were fixed at the 12 o’clock direction to grasp the lesion edge, providing upward traction. The submucosal layer was in full exposure and blood vessels were clearly visible ( Fig. 4 ). The operation progressed with an antegrade approach from the anal to the oral side. By dynamically adjusting the position of the forceps, they can exert a controlled pulling force in multiple directions, which allowed precise electrocoagulation hemostasis and systematic dissection. Finally, the lesion was successfully completely removed ( Fig. 5 ). The total duration of the submucosal dissection was significantly reduced to approximately 30 minutes, with no intraoperative complications ( Video 1 ).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The scheme of the EndoFaster robotic traction system.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

With robot-assisted traction, the submucosal layer was in full exposure (left) and blood vessels were clearly visible (right).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The lesion was successfully completely removed.

Download video file (115.6MB, mp4)

A novel robotic traction system for endoscopic submucosal dissection – achieving en bloc resection of an extensive laterally spreading tumor in the lower rectum.

Video 1

Compared with conventional traction methods (e.g. dental floss 1 2 and figure-of-eight clip 3 4 ), EndoFaster enables multiple-position and multiple-angle traction due to its flexibility, which improves dissection efficiency for large lesions in anatomically challenging locations, increases en bloc resection rates, and reduces intraoperative complications, as evidenced by its successful use in a gastric angle lesion by Cui et al. 5 in 2024. Our presented case further exemplifies these advantages and marks its first application in colorectal ESD in China. EndoFaster facilitates ESD procedures, enhancing their safety and thereby offering a novel strategy for colorectal ESD. More cases and a longer follow-up are required to validate the advantages of this technique.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD_3AD

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributorsʼ Statement Zhiyong Zhai: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Chongju Bao: Resources, Visualization. Wanjun Li: Writing – original draft. Chao Yang: Methodology. Wei Gong: Conceptualization, Supervision.

References

  • 1.Tsuji K, Yoshida N, Nakanishi H et al. Recent traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:5917–5926. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mizutani H, Ono S, Ohki D et al. Recent Development of Techniques and Devices in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Clin Endosc. 2017;50:562–568. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yoshida M, Takizawa K, Nonaka S et al. Conventional versus traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for large esophageal cancers: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (with video) Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:55–6500. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy. 2023;55:361–389. doi: 10.1055/a-2031-0874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cui C, Lu X, Zuo XL et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric angle cancer by using a simplified robot-assisted device for traction. Endoscopy. 2024;56 01:E49–E50. doi: 10.1055/a-2227-6465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Endoscopy are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES