Skip to main content
The Journal of Nutrition logoLink to The Journal of Nutrition
. 2025 Jul 31;155(11):3713–3725. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.015

The Association of Gut Microbiota With TRPM7 Genotype, Colorectal Polyps, and Magnesium

Shan Sun 1,, Xiangzhu Zhu 2,, Xiang Huang 2, Chang Yu 3, Timothy Su 2, Harvey J Murff 4, Reid M Ness 5, M Andrea Azcarate-Peril 6, Martha J Shrubsole 2, Qi Dai 2,
PMCID: PMC12799418  PMID: 40750038

Abstract

Background

We previously reported that individuals with the transient receptor potential melastatin 7 (TRPM7) GA/AA genotype and consumed diets high in Ca:Mg ratio had increased risk of colorectal polyps.

Objectives

The aim was to identify whether the gut microbiota plays a role in the association of TRPM7 genotype, Ca:Mg intake ratio, and risk of colorectal polyps.

Methods

We analyzed the gut microbiota of 240 participants in a double-blind 2 × 2 factorial (TRPM7 genotype and Ca:Mg intake ratios) randomized trial by sequencing the stool, rectal swab, and rectal mucosa tissue samples of each participant.

Results

The gut microbiota of participants with the GA genotype significantly differed from those with the GG genotype in all 3 sample types, with an altered abundance of Prevotella and Bacteroides in swab samples. Prevotella in rectal mucosa and Bacteroides in swab were associated with an increased risk of metachronous colorectal polyps. Optimizing high-diet Ca:Mg ratios to 2.3 through Mg supplementation resulted in a reduced abundance of Prevotella in rectal swabs and Bacteroides in stool samples. We identified multiple microbes in all 3 sample types linked to risk of metachronous colorectal polyps.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that the gut microbiota in stool, rectal swab, and mucosa are associated with risk of metachronous colorectal polyps, and diet changes could modify the abundance of TRPM7-related microbes.

This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01105169 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01105169).

Keywords: gut microbiota, TRPM7, colorectal polyps, magnesium, precision-based randomized trial

Introduction

Transient receptor potential melastatin (TRPM)7, a magnesium-regulated chanzyme [1] possessing both ion channel and kinase activities [2], has a much stronger affinity to Mg2+ than that to Ca2+ [[3], [4], [5]]. We previously reported that the Thr1482Ile functional variant (or G→A) [6] in the TRPM7 was associated with significantly increased risks of both colorectal adenomas and serrated polyps in those with high Ca:Mg intake ratios [7]. The TRPM7 gene was also observed to possess “driver” mutations that contribute to the development of multiple cancers [8]. In recent years, TRPM7 was identified as a downstream effector of mixed lineage kinase like (MLKL)-mediated necroptosis [9], a new form of programmed cell deaths [10]. In contrast to canonical programmed cell death (i.e., apoptosis) [10], MLKL-mediated necroptosis elicits robust adaptive immune responses [11,12], including the inflammatory cascade [10] against bacterial/viral infection [13]. Substantial evidence has linked inflammation in the colorectum to colorectal carcinogenesis [14,15]. In a recent report, expression levels of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, particularly COX-2 combined with TRPM7 and MLKL, in rectal mucosa were longitudinally associated with increased risks of metachronous adenomas and serrated polyps [16].

Gut microbiota plays a crucial role in human health and diseases. It interacts with host immune system and contributes to the transition between inflammatory and noninflammatory states of gut. A dysbiotic microbial community can weaken the intestinal barrier and trigger inflammation [17]. Mucin glycans protect the gut epithelium from potential pathogens [18,19] and regulate the composition of the mucin-degrading microbiota [[20], [21], [22]]. Sulfation provides enhanced protection to mucin glycans from mucin-degrading bacteria without desulfating capacities [18,23] and serves as a mucosal barrier against colorectal inflammation [24]. Overactive mucin degradation activity of gut microbiota can contribute to a thinner and more permeable colonic mucus barrier and increase susceptibility to pathogen infection and inflammation [25]. Microbial desulfating enzymes are highly conserved and are activated by higher Ca:Mg ratios [[26], [27], [28]]. Thus, we hypothesize that high Ca:Mg intake ratios can lead to overgrowth of desulfating microbes in the colorectum and colorectal carcinogenesis, particularly in those with the Thr1482Ile variant of the TRPM7 gene, because the Thr1482Ile variant caused reduced TRPM7 activity [6], whereas TRPM7-deficient cells led to Mg deficiency.

To investigate the potential roles of human gut microbiota in the association of TRPM7 genotype, high Ca:Mg intake ratios, and colorectal adenomas and serrated polyps, we performed whole genome sequencing on stool, rectal swab, and mucosal tissue samples of participants in the Personalized Prevention of Colorectal Cancer Trial (PPCCT) designed to examine the interaction between Ca:Mg intake ratios and the TRPM7 genotype in affecting biomarkers for colorectal carcinogenesis. First, we investigated whether optimizing Ca:Mg intake ratios to 2.3 through Mg supplement modified biomarkers related to colorectal carcinogenesis (e.g., COX-2, TRPM7, and MLKL) in rectal mucosa in a precision-based randomized trial randomly assigned by TRPM7 genotype and Mg treatment. Next, we identified the TRPM7 genotype–associated microbes in a study specifically conducted in participants with Ca:Mg intake ratios of ≥2.6. Among the 227 participants with a history of polyp, adenoma, and serrated polyp diagnosed before the baseline, 124 participants had 1 or more colonoscopy after they completed the trial and were included in the metachronous polyp analysis. Participants without a polyp during the surveillance colonoscopy completed posttrial were defined as metachronous-free controls, and participants with a diagnosis of polyp during the surveillance colonoscopy posttrial were classified as metachronous polyp cases. We examined whether the microbes that were significantly associated with the genotype were associated with risk of metachronous adenoma/serrated polyps. We also evaluated whether optimizing the Ca:Mg intake ratio to 2.3 through Mg supplementation altered the abundance of 2 desulfating microbes that were associated with TRPM7 genotype and risk of metachronous polyps. We also performed an analysis to analyze which other taxa linked to risk of metachronous polyps independent of TRPM7 genotype.

Methods

Precision-based randomized trial

This is an ancillary study of the parent study, the PPCCT (NCT01105169 at clinicatTrials.gov). The PPCCT is a double-blind 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial conducted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, Tennessee, designed to examine the interaction between Ca:Mg intake ratios and the Thr1482Ile functional variant in the TRPM7 gene [7] in affecting biomarkers for colorectal carcinogenesis. The study was approved by the Vanderbilt institutional review board (No.: 100106), and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants. The detailed design has been reported elsewhere [29,30]. In brief, participants aged 40–85 y were recruited from the VUMC patient sources including the following: 1) 236 individuals with adenomas or serrated polyps (i.e., hyperplastic polyps) diagnosed from 1998 to 2014 and 2) 14 polyp-free individuals with a high risk of colorectal cancer. Two 24-h dietary recalls, which recorded all foods and beverages and their amounts over the 24-h period, were performed for all participants at study baseline to calculate intake levels of Ca, Mg, and the Ca:Mg intake ratios for each recall. The means were calculated for the Ca, Mg, and Ca:Mg ratio intakes across the 2 recalls. Eligible participants had a Ca intake of ≥700 and <2000 mg/d and in whom the Ca:Mg intake ratio was ≥2.6.

Eligible participants were assigned to Mg treatment or placebo according to the randomization schedule. The randomization procedure used randomly assigned blocks of 2 or 4 to allocate subjects in a 1:1 ratio to 2 treatment arms—magnesium treatment or placebo—within 3 strata defined by the TRPM7 genotype: GG, GA, and AA. Eligible individuals were enrolled sequentially and were assigned sequentially to receive magnesium treatment or placebo according to the randomization schedule. The participants assigned to magnesium treatment received a personalized dose of Mg supplementation that would reduce the Ca:Mg intake ratio to ∼2.3. This ratio was selected because previous studies suggested that intakes of both calcium and magnesium were beneficial when Ca:Mg intake ratios were between 1.7 and 2.6–2.8 [7,29,[31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]]. Three sizes of Mg glycinate capsules were filled by the Vanderbilt Investigational Pharmacy personnel following USP 797 conditions according to the compounding instructions. Identical-appearing placebos (i.e., microcrystalline cellulose) were made to match Mg capsules. Participants, study investigators, and staff were blinded to the assigned interventions. The intervention period was 12 wk. Anthropometric measurements (weight, height, and waist and hip circumference) were measured at least twice at each study visit. The proposed primary end points for the PPCCT were biomarkers related to colorectal carcinogenesis in rectal mucosa, including necroptosis biomarkers (i.e., TRPM7 and phosphorylated mixed lineage kinase like [pMLKL]), inflammation biomarkers (i.e., COX-2), apoptosis biomarkers (i.e., BCL2-associated X [BAX] and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling [TUNEL]) and cell proliferation biomarkers (i.e., antigen Kiel 67 [Ki67]), as well as the ratios of Ki67:BAX and the ratio of Ki67:TUNEL in rectal mucosa.

Of the 250 randomly assigned participants that started treatments, 239 completed the trial, with 11 participants finishing part of the study before withdrawing [29]. Six of the withdrawals were due to self-reported adverse events (4 withdrawals in the treatment arm and 2 in the placebo arm). One of them had donated biospecimens at baseline and at the end of the trial. Therefore, 240 participants were included who had biospecimens collected at baseline and at the end of the trial. Compliance with the pill regimen was very high for both the placebo and treatment arms [mean (SD)] based on pill counts were 97.3% (4.4) and 97.5% (3.9), respectively; P = 0.83 for difference between the arms).

Genotyping assay for the TRPM7 gene

The detailed approach was previously reported [10]. In brief, DNA was extracted from buffy coat fractions or cheek cells by using a QIAamp DNA mini-kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The allelic discrimination of the rs8042919 polymorphism (i.e., Thr1482Ile functional polymorphism [G→A] genotyping) in the TRPM7 gene was assessed by using the TaqMan genotyping assay (Assay ID: C_25756319_10; Applied Biosystems). Baseline characteristics for continuous variables (mean ± SD, median, and IQR) and categorical variables (count and percentages) were reported for TRPM7 genotype. Generalized linear models and Pearson correlation were used for continuous variables and Kruskal–Wallis and χ2 tests were conducted to compare categorical variables between genotype groups.

Assays for immunohistochemistry biomarkers in rectal biopsies

During the study visits at baseline and the end of the PPCCT, biopsy tissues from the quadrants in the mid-rectum were collected and put in 10% neutral buffered formalin immediately for 24 h, followed by standard paraffin embedding. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was conducted following DAKO EnVision+ System-HRP protocol (Rabbit/Mouse kit, Code K4010/Code K4007) to detect TRPM7, pMLKL, BAX, COX-2, and Ki67. Detailed antibody information and validation data were included in Supplemental Table 1. Positive control tissues included human skin (for pMLKL), liver (for BAX), and a laboratory-constructed tissue microarray with normal and colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues for TRPM7, COX-2, and Ki67. For negative controls, phosphate-buffered saline was used to replace primary antibodies. Both positive and negative control slides were processed concurrently with each staining batch. Apoptosis was detected using the Promega DeadEnd Colorimetric TUNEL Assay (Promega BioScience; Cat# G7130). Biomarker expression was quantified separately in the upper (luminal-facing, 40%) and lower (submucosa-adjacent, 60%) zones of the rectal crypts using a computer-aided imaging analysis system comprising an Olympus BX40 microscope and BioQuant NOVA Prime imaging software (BioQuant). Detailed methodologies for antibody validation, TUNEL assay modification, and zonal quantitative imaging analysis have been published elsewhere [16].

Whole genome shotgun sequencing of stool, swab and rectal biopsies

We collected stool, rectal swab, and mucosal tissue samples through rectal biopsy for the 240 participants at home or in-person study visits at the beginning of the trial (baseline) and at the end of the trial. Whole genome shotgun sequencing was performed on the stool, rectal swab, and mucosal tissue samples collected at both the beginning and the end of the trial as previously described [37,38]. The details of sequencing methods are described in Supplemental Methods. The metagenome sequencing files of stool, rectal swab, and mucosal tissue samples at both the beginning and the end of the trial were processed with KneadData for quality control and removal of human DNA contamination. MetaPhlAn2 was used for analyzing the taxonomic profiles of shotgun metagenome sequences [39], and HUMAnN2 was used for functional profiling including the abundance of functional pathways [40]. The sequences generated in this study can be accessed at National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BioProject PRJNA693850.

Statistical analyses of TRPM7 genotype and magnesium treatment

The primary outcome is the changes of gut microbiota, measured at the community level as β-diversity and at individual taxa level as the relative abundance of each taxon. For each of the 3 sample types (stool, rectal swab, and rectal mucosa), Bray-Curtis dissimilarity between samples was calculated based on the genus abundance, stratified and unstratified pathway abundance, and visualized with principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). Permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) of gut taxonomic and functional profiles was used to test their associations with TRPM7 genotypes. The genus abundance matrix was used as the dependent variable in the taxonomic model, and the functional pathway abundance matrix was used as the dependent variable in the functional model. Because of the insufficient statistical power due to sample size, we combined the pretreatment and posttreatment samples for this analysis. To verify this finding, we also analyzed the pretreatment and posttreatment samples separately with the PERMANOVA test. We also visualized the separations between GG and GA genotypes in the pretreatment and posttreatment samples with PCoA.

In addition, we also tested the association between each taxa/pathway and genotypes with univariate nonparametric Wilcoxon tests, where the abundance of individual taxa/pathway was specified as the dependent variable. P values were adjusted with the Benjamini–Hochberg method to correct for multiple comparisons. Because of the limited statistical power with 240 participants, we pooled the pretrial and posttrial time points for the genotype-related analyses. Because the BMI (in kg/m2) of participants with GG and GA genotypes were different, we also ran a set of linear regression models with adjustment for BMI, where the abundance of individual taxa was used as dependent variable. Linear regression models of gut microbiota and biomarkers in rectal mucosa were used to test their association with assignment arm (Mg supplement compared with placebo) to examine the effect of reducing Ca:Mg intake ratios to 2.3. This model was further stratified by TRPM7 genotype, and the models were repeated after adjustment for age, sex, and baseline levels. In these analyses, the abundance of individual taxa or biomarkers was used as the dependent variable. All P values are 2 sided, and statistical significance was determined using an α level of 0.05. The data analyses were performed with software SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1 (version 9.4; SAS Institute).

Metachronous colorectal polyp/adenoma

The median follow-up time was 3.5 y after the completion of the PPCCT. Metachronous adenoma cases had a history of adenoma and a subsequent metachronous adenoma. Metachronous serrated polyp cases had a history of serrated polyp and a subsequent metachronous serrated polyp. A flow chart of the study population in the PPCCT is shown in Figure 1. During 2017–2018, we completed an extensive review of electronic medical records at VUMC to gather colonoscopy and pathology reports for the 240 PPCCT participants who completed the trial and had biospecimens collected at the baseline and the end of the trial. The colonoscopy and pathology reports provided detailed information on the procedure and on number, size, type, histology, degree of atypia, and location of polyps. In this analysis, 227 participants with a history of polyp, adenoma, and serrated polyp diagnosed before the baseline of the PPCCT were defined as participants with 1) adenoma and/or serrated polyp; 2) tubular or tubulovillous or villous adenoma; and 3) serrated polyp (hyperplastic polyp or sessile serrated lesion), respectively. Further, 124 participants had 1 or more colonoscopy at VUMC after they completed the PPCCT and were included in the metachronous polyp analysis. Participants without a polyp during the surveillance colonoscopy completed post-PPCCT were defined as metachronous-free controls for this analysis, and participants with a diagnosis of polyp during the surveillance colonoscopy post-PPCCT were classified as metachronous polyp cases.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Study population flow diagram (CONSORT). PPCCT, Personalized Prevention of Colorectal Cancer Trial; VUMC, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Statistical analyses of microbial association with metachronous colorectal polyp/adenoma

The secondary outcome in this study is the colorectal polyps. Unconditional logistic regression models of metachronous colorectal adenoma/serrated polyps were used to estimate odds ratios and their 95% CI as a measure of the strength of the associations with the abundance of TRPM7-associated microbiota. Abundance of microbiota were categorized into tertiles based on the distribution of the controls in all analyses. The first model was adjusted only for age. The second model was additionally adjusted for other potentially confounding factors, including sex and BMI. Tests for trend across tertiles were performed in logistic regression models by assigning the score j to the jth level of the variable selected. Stratified analyses by the TRPM7 genotype were conducted. Formal multiplicative interactions were also evaluated in logistic regression models by likelihood ratio tests. For an untargeted analysis, we conducted analyses to test the associations of metachronous colorectal adenoma/serrated polyps with the abundance of all genera and species. As not all microbial abundance met the assumption of normal distribution, we used nonparametric Wilcoxon tests and the continuous abundance of taxa with taxa abundance as the dependent variable. P values were corrected for multiple hypotheses testing with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Results

Baseline demographic characteristics by TRPM7 genotype

We found that the demographic characteristics and other factors, including sex, age, educational achievement, income, use of antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and intakes of total energy, were not significantly different by TRPM7 Thr1482Ile genotype (Supplemental Table 2). However, we found participants with the GA genotype had significantly higher BMI (31.4) than those with the GG genotype (29.6).

Effects of Mg treatment on IHC biomarkers in rectal mucosa by TRPM7 genotype

Compared with the placebo arm, reducing the Ca:Mg intake ratio to 2.3 through Mg supplementation did not significantly affect the levels of necroptosis biomarkers (i.e., TRPM7 and pMLKL), inflammation biomarkers (i.e., COX-2), apoptosis biomarkers (i.e., BAX and TUNEL), and cell proliferation biomarkers (i.e., Ki67), as well as the ratios of Ki67:BAX and the ratio of Ki67:TUNEL in rectal mucosa (Table 1; Supplemental Figure 1). In the stratified analysis by TRPM7 genotype, decreasing the intake Ca:Mg ratio with Mg supplementation did not significantly change the above-mentioned biomarkers in those with either GA or GG genotypes.

TABLE 1.

Changes in rectal mucosa immunohistochemical biomarkers by Mg treatment compared with placebo.

Changes (posttreatment − baseline) By treatment group
P
n Magnesium n Placebo
TRPM7 Mean ± SD 112 0.06 ± 1.31 112 −0.03 ± 1.20 0.92
Median (IQR) −0.07 (−0.73 to 0.74) 0.03 (−0.60 to 0.58)
pMLKL Mean ± SD 112 0.05 ± 0.94 111 0.04 ± 0.90 0.83
Median (IQR) 0.10 (−0.45 to 0.53) −0.02 (−0.43 to 0.64)
TUNEL Mean ± SD 116 0.15 ± 1.14 112 0.16 ± 1.35 0.88
Median (IQR) 0.17 (−0.71 to 0.66) 0.10 (−0.71 to 1.05)
BAX Mean ± SD 116 −0.13 ± 1.29 112 −0.19 ± 1.24 0.46
Median (IQR) −0.13 (−0.79 to 0.82) −0.26 (−0.73 to 0.42)
ki67 Mean ± SD 115 −0.02 ± 0.64 111 0.00 ± 0.77 0.80
Median (IQR) −0.08 (−0.45 to 0.45) −0.01 (−0.48 to 0.32)
COX2 Mean ± SD 111 0.08 ± 0.74 109 −0.04 ± 0.82 0.20
Median (IQR) 0.11 (−0.43 to 0.62) 0.01 (−0.63 to 0.50)
ki67: TUNEL Mean ± SD 110 −0.21 ± 1.33 110 −0.23 ± 1.50 0.80
Median (IQR) −0.10 (−1.07 to 0.78) −0.10 (−1.18 to 0.72)
ki67: BAX Mean ± SD 115 0.15 ± 1.43 111 0.20 ± 1.33 0.66
Median (IQR) 0.14 (−0.62 to 0.86) 0.19 (−0.54 to 0.83)

Values are in log scales. P values were calculated using Kruskal–Wallis tests comparing the mean changes between randomization groups.

Abbreviations: BAX, BCL2-associated X; COX, cyclooxygenase; IHC, immunohistochemical; pMLKL, phosphorylated mixed lineage kinase like; TRPM7, transient receptor potential melastatin 7; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling.

Associations between the TRPM7 genotype and the gut microbiota

We analyzed the associations between the TRPM7 genotype and the relative abundances of gut taxa as measured in stools, rectal swabs, and rectal mucosal tissues. We first analyzed the microbial association with the genotype at the microbial community level using the PERMANOVA test and found that the TRPM7 genotype was significantly associated with taxonomic variation of the individuals’ gut microbiota in all 3 sample types with a modest effect size (stool—R2 = 0.0068; P = 0.003; swab—R2 = 0.0063; P = 0.004; tissue—R2 = 0.0043; P = 0.026) (Figure 2). We used PCoA to visualize the differences between genotypes and found that the 95% confidence limits of the 2 genotypes were not separated at the first 2 PCoA axes except for swab samples. We also observed similar separations between the GG and GA genotypes in pretreatment and posttreatment groups with the PCoA in stool and swab samples (Supplemental Figure 2). However, when we analyzed the microbial association with the genotype in the pretreatment and posttreatment groups separately with PERMANOVA tests, the R2 remained similar but the P values were no longer significant (Supplemental Figure 2). It is likely that the current sample size lacks statistical power, and future studies with a large sample size are needed to verify the findings.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Multidimensional scaling of genus composition of stool, rectal swab, and rectal mucosa tissue samples of study participants. Stool (A), swab (B), and tissue (C) samples were colored based on genotype. The ellipses indicate the 95% confidence limits of each genotype. PCoA, principal coordinate analysis; PERMANOVA, permutational multivariate ANOVA.

In addition to the PERMANOVA tests examining the TRPM7 genotype and gut microbiota composition, we analyzed the associations for each taxon and pathway using the univariate nonparametric Wilcoxon test. A total of 14 taxa (phylum to species level) in stools and swabs had significantly different relative abundance between the TRPM7 genotypes in stools and swabs, but not in tissues after correcting for multiple hypotheses testing [false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.1] (Supplemental Figure 3). The genera significantly associated with TRPM7 included Bacteroides, Prevotella, Alistipes, Parabacteroides, and Odoribacter. Alistipes, Parabacteroides, and Odoribacter in stool samples were higher in individuals with the GG genotype. Prevotella had a higher relative abundance in individuals with the GG genotype in both stool and swab samples (Figure 3). Bacteroides had a higher relative abundance in swab samples for those with the GA genotype. Dialister invisus was more abundant in individuals with the GA genotype in stools and swabs, whereas Lachnospiraceae bacterium 3_1_57FAA_CT1 had a higher abundance in individuals with the GA genotype in stools. Odoribacter splanchnicus and Alistipes finegoldii, and the order Bacteroidales were more abundant in individuals with the GG genotype in stool samples. There were no significantly different taxa in tissue samples. We used linear regression models to test the interactions between TRPM7 genotypes and BMI, and the microbial associations with genotype adjusted for BMI. We found that the interactions were not significant for these taxa in both stool and rectal swab samples. After adjusting for BMI, 8 taxa in stool samples were still significantly associated with genotype, whereas 6 taxa including Odoribacter, Parabacteroides, Alistipes, Lachnospiraceae bacterium 3_1_57FAA_CT1, and Dialister invisus were not significantly associated. The 5 taxa in rectal swab samples remained significant after adjusting for BMI (Supplemental Table 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Boxplots of genus compositions that are significantly different between genotypes in stool and rectal swab samples. There were no significantly different genera in rectal mucosa tissue samples (Wilcoxon test, FDR < 0.1). FDR, false discovery rate.

Similarly, we used PERMANOVA and PCoA to identify potential associations between pathway profiles and the genotype. We analyzed both the pathway abundance stratified by taxa and the unstratified abundance (the total abundance of each pathway across all taxa) (Supplemental Figures 4 and 5). The associations of individual pathways and genotypes were tested with the Wilcoxon test. The significant pathways were only found in tissue samples after correcting for multiple hypotheses testing, including unstratified PWY-6386: UDP−N−acetylmuramoyl−pentapeptide biosynthesis II, stratified PEPTIDOGLYCANSYN-PWY: peptidoglycan biosynthesis I (meso−diaminopimelate containing) and PWY-6387: UDP−N−acetylmuramoyl−pentapeptide biosynthesis I (meso−diaminopimelate containing) in Bacteroides stercoris (Supplemental Figure 6).

TRPM7-related desulfating microbiota and pathways and risk of metachronous colorectal adenoma/serrated polyp

The genera Bacteroides, Prevotella, Alistipes, Parabacteroides, and Odoribacter were significantly associated with the TRPM7 genotype in ≥1 sample type. We next asked whether their relative abundances in mucosa, rectal swabs, and stools at the end of the trial were associated with metachronous colorectal adenoma/serrated polyp risks. Bacteroides and Prevotella were significantly associated with risk of metachronous colorectal polyps (Table 2; Supplemental Figure 7), whereas the other 3 genera, Alistipes, Parabacteroides, and Odoribacter, were not (Supplemental Table 4). Overall, the abundance of Prevotella, but not Bacteroides, in rectal mucosa was associated with a nearly 3-fold increased risk of metachronous colorectal polyps (i.e., colorectal adenoma/serrated polyps) in a dose-response manner (P-trend = 0.01) after adjusting for potential confounding factors (Table 2). The association remained statistically significant after FDR correction. In the stratified analysis by polyp subtype, we observed that the highest abundance of Prevotella in rectal mucosa was associated with a 3.25-fold (95% CI: 1.32, 8.40) increased risk of metachronous adenomas (P-trend = 0.01). The association also remained significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. These associations did not significantly differ by the TRPM7 genotype (P-interaction = 0.50). The highest tertile abundance of Bacteroides in swabs was related to an increased risk of metachronous serrated polyps with an odds ratio of 11.04 (95% CI: 1.18, 103.63; P-trend = 0.02; P-interaction with the TRPM7 genotype = 0.71), whereas the abundance of Prevotella and Bacteroides in stool samples was not significantly associated with risk of adenomas and/or serrated polyps. Alistipes, Parabacteroides, and Odoribacter in mucosa, rectal swabs, and stool samples were not significantly associated with risk of metachronous polyps, regardless of polyp type (Supplemental Table 4). As shown in Supplemental Table 5, the pathway abundance at the end of the trial were not significantly associated with risk of metachronous polyps.

TABLE 2.

Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for risk of metachronous colorectal polyps by posttrial levels of bacteria in mucosal tissue and rectal swab.

Bacteria Cases/controls Biomarker level (Tertile)
P-trend FDR
T1
T2
T3
Reference (low) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) (high)
Rectal mucosa
 Metachronous polyp (adenoma/serrated polyp)
 g_Bacteroides 68/53 1.00 0.45 (0.16, 1.30) 1.46 (0.53, 3.97) 0.40 0.48
 g_Prevotella 68/53 1.00 1.89 (0.10, 35.36) 2.99 (1.10, 8.10) 0.03∗ 0.09
 Metachronous adenoma
 g_Bacteroides 41/53 1.00 0.30 (0.08, 1.14) 1.52 (0.49, 4.77) 0.36 0.48
 g_Prevotella 41/53 1.00 3.47 (0.16, 76.66) 4.80 (1.43, 16.06) 0.01∗ 0.06
 Metachronous serrated polyp
 g_Bacteroides 14/53 1.00 1.19 (0.21, 6.92) 2.85 (0.50, 16.20) 0.20 0.40
 g_Prevotella 14/53 1.00 1.07 (0.20, 5.65) 0.98 0.98
Rectal swab
 Metachronous polyp (adenoma/serrated polyp)
 g_Bacteroides 69/53 1.00 1.21 (0.44, 3.33) 2.18 (0.73, 6.55) 0.16 0.48
 g_Prevotella 69/53 1.00 0.80 (0.29, 2.17) 1.14 (0.36, 3.58) 0.83 0.89
 Metachronous adenoma
 g_Bacteroides 42/53 1.00 0.90 (0.27, 2.95) 1.10 (0.31, 3.96) 0.88 0.89
 g_Prevotella 42/53 1.00 0.80 (0.24, 2.69) 1.80 (0.44, 7.40) 0.41 0.82
 Metachronous serrated polyp
 g_Bacteroides 14/53 1.00 5.97 (0.41, 87.35) 38.94 (1.91, 792.16) 0.009∗∗ 0.05
 g_Prevotella 14/53 1.00 0.93 (0.17, 5.17) 0.89 0.89
Stool
 Metachronous polyp (adenoma/serrated polyp)
 g_Bacteroides 68/50 1.00 1.26 (0.47, 3.38) 1.03 (0.36, 2.93) 0.94 0.94
 g_Prevotella 68/50 1.00 1.20 (0.40, 3.61) 1.62 (0.50, 5.26) 0.43 0.80
 Metachronous adenoma
 g_Bacteroides 41/50 1.00 1.41 (0.44, 4.50) 1.90 (0.55, 6.53) 0.31 0.80
 g_Prevotella 41/50 1.00 1.10 (0.30, 4.06) 1.08 (0.26, 4.45) 0.90 0.94
 Metachronous serrated polyp
 g_Bacteroides 14/50 1.00 0.96 (0.21, 4.49) 0.57 (0.10, 3.17) 0.53 0.80
 g_Prevotella 14/50 1.00 1.89 (0.34, 10.36) 0.41 0.80

Unconditional logistic regression models adjusted for age (continuous), sex, BMI (continuous) and baseline level. Tests for trend across tertiles were performed in logistic regression models by assigning1, 2, and 3 to the levels of bacteria (g_ indicates genus level). Due to small sample sizes for metachronous serrated polyp, there was no cases in the middle tertile for g_Prevotella.

P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01.

Effects of Mg treatment on the abundance of TRPM7-related tumorigenic microbes

Prevotella and Bacteroides are among the most prominent colorectal cancer–associated bacteria, reported in higher abundance in cancer than those in normal tissues [41,42]. Prevotella and Bacteroides are mucin-degrading bacteria [18], and they possess desulfating capacities to desulfate glycans from host and diets [[43], [44], [45]]. Since desulfating enzymes are dependent on Ca:Mg ratios, we hypothesized that compared with the placebo arm, reducing intake Ca:Mg ratios to 2.3 with Mg supplementation may reduce the abundance of Prevotella and Bacteroides. We conducted the analyses in rectal mucosa, rectal swabs, and stool samples (Table 3). Optimizing the Ca:Mg intake ratio to 2.3 through Mg supplementation did not significantly change the abundance of Prevotella and Bacteroides in rectal mucosa but reduced Prevotella by 13.4% in rectal swabs (P = 0.06) and Bacteroides by 1.3% in stool samples (P = 0.03), respectively, compared with placebo. In stratified analysis by the TRPM7 genotype, we found that optimizing the Ca:Mg intake ratio to 2.3 through Mg supplementation did not change Prevotella and Bacteroides abundance in mucosa regardless of TRPM7 genotype (P-interaction = 0.64). On the contrary, compared with the placebo arm, decreasing the intake Ca:Mg ratios to 2.3 with Mg supplementation reduced the abundance of Prevotella by 24.8% in rectal swabs (P = 0.007) and Bacteroides by 1.7% in stool samples (P = 0.03) in those with the GA genotype, but no significant effects were found in those with the GG genotype. The interaction between the TRPM7 genotype and abundance of Prevotella in rectal swabs was statistically significant (P-interaction = 0.03).

TABLE 3.

Changes in Prevotella and Bacteroides by Mg treatment compared with placebo in rectal mucosa, swab, and stool.

Bacteria Change from baseline
P1 P2
Treatment Change (%) Placebo Change (%)
Total (n = 229)
 Rectal mucosa
 g_Bacteroides −0.005 ± 0.208 −0.08 −0.026 ± 0.232 −0.41 0.47 0.51
 g_Prevotella 0.042 ± 2.291 2.03 0.203 ± 2.457 9.87 0.61 0.59
 Rectal swab
 g_Bacteroides −0.000 ± 0.392 −0.01 −0.014 ± 0.406 −0.23 0.79 0.40
 g_Prevotella −0.450 ± 2.057 −13.37 0.074 ± 2.195 1.97 0.06 0.06
 Stool
 g_Bacteroides −0.078 ± 0.483 −1.25 0.046 ± 0.412 0.74 0.04∗ 0.03∗
 g_Prevotella 0.095 ± 1.577 5.55 0.052 ± 1.743 3.05 0.85 0.88
TRPM7 genotype: GG (n = 143)
 Rectal mucosa
 g_Bacteroides −0.030 ± 0.205 −0.48 −0.027 ± 0.252 −0.42 0.93 0.79
 g_Prevotella 0.108 ± 2.268 5.02 0.245 ± 2.686 12.13 0.74 0.84
 Rectal swab
 g_Bacteroides 0.024 ± 0.413 0.39 −0.013 ± 0.465 −0.21 0.61 0.24
 g_Prevotella −0.174 ± 1.954 −4.24 −0.095 ± 2.239 −2.36 0.82 0.83
 Stool
 g_Bacteroides −0.063 ± 0.536 −1.01 0.022 ± 0.410 0.35 0.29 0.24
 g_Prevotella −0.059 ± 1.716 −2.90 −0.001 ± 1.814 −0.04 0.84 0.83
TRPM7 genotype: GA (n = 86)
 Rectal mucosa
 g_Bacteroides 0.039 ± 0.208 0.61 −0.025 ± 0.196 −0.39 0.15 0.07
 g_Prevotella −0.076 ± 2.355 −4.05 0.132 ± 2.034 6.20 0.67 0.54
 Rectal swab
 g_Bacteroides −0.041 ± 0.355 −0.66 −0.017 ± 0.283 −0.27 0.72 0.77
 g_Prevotella −0.919 ± 2.165 −24.84 0.364 ± 2.111 10.84 0.007∗∗ 0.007∗∗
 Stool
 g_Bacteroides −0.105 ± 0.377 −1.68 0.084 ± 0.418 1.37 0.03∗ 0.04∗
 g_Prevotella 0.363 ± 1.276 32.40 0.137 ± 1.639 8.85 0.48 0.68

Data are given as mean ± SD. Generalized linear model were used: P1 was not adjusted; P2 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and baseline level. P values reflect tests comparing the mean changes between randomization groups.

P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01.

Untargeted analysis to identify tumorigenic microbes linked to risk of metachronous colorectal adenoma/serrated polyp independent of genotype

Finally, we conducted an untargeted analysis in addition to the aforementioned TRPM7 genotype–linked microbes to screen the associations of metachronous adenoma/serrated polyps with all nonrare genera (present in >25% samples) and species identified by shotgun metagenomics. After FDR correction, we found 6 taxa in stool samples significantly associated with metachronous colorectal adenoma/serrated polyps, 12 significant taxa in swab samples, and 3 significant taxa in tissue samples (Table 4; Supplemental Figure 8). There were 4 taxa in stool, 5 in swab, and 3 in tissue, which were significantly associated with adenoma, whereas 9 taxa were significantly associated with serrated polyps in rectal swab samples and 1 in stool samples. In stool samples, the associated taxa were mainly Barnesiella spp, Roseburia spp, and Bacteroides spp, with higher abundance in metachronous polyp cases. In rectal swab samples, Barnesiella spp, Bacteroides spp, and Acidaminococcus spp were more abundant in cases, whereas Eggerthella, Clostridium, Anaerotruncus, and Flavonifractor spp were more abundant in controls. In rectal mucosa, the abundance of Bacteroides faecis and Acidaminococcus species were higher in cases, and the abundance of Ruminococcus torques and Blautia sp was lower in cases than that in controls. The taxa significantly associated with metachronous adenoma/serrated polyps were different across the 3 sampling methods. There were 13 taxa unique to rectal swabs, 3 to rectal tissues, and 4 to stool samples (Table 4). Three taxa were significant in both stool and swabs, 1 taxon in both stool and tissue, and 2 in both swabs and tissues.

TABLE 4.

Taxa significantly different between1 metachronous colorectal polyps and controls in stool, rectal swab, and rectal mucosa microbiota in the untargeted analyses.

Stool only Swab only Tissue only Stool and swab Stool and tissue Swab and tissue All
Polyps g_Roseburia
s_Roseburia inulinivorans
g_Eggerthella
s_Eggerthella unclassified ↓
s_Prevotella copri2
g_Clostridium
s_Clostridium symbiosum
g_Anaerotruncus
s_Anaerotruncus colihominis
none s_Bacteroides dorei
g_Barnesiella
s_Barnesiella intestinihominis
s_Bacteroides faecis g_Acidaminococcus
s_Acidaminococcus unclassified ↑
None
Adenoma g_Roseburia
s_Roseburia intestinalis
s_Prevotella copri2
g_Anaerotruncus
s_Anaerotruncus colihominis
s_Bacteroides faecis
s_Ruminococcus torques
g_Barnesiella
s_Barnesiella intestinihominis
None None None
Serrated polyps s_Parabacteroides unclassified ↓ g_Eggerthella
s_Eggerthella unclassified ↓
g_Bacteroides
s_Bacteroides dorei2
g_Clostridium
g_Flavonifractor
s_Flavonifractor plautii
s_Lachnospiraceae bacterium 3 1 57FAA CT1
s_Roseburia inulinivorans
None None None None None
1

Taxa were considered as significant with FDR < 0.1. ↑ indicates significantly increased abundance in cases compared with that in controls, whereas ↓ represents significantly reduced abundance in cases than that in controls. g_ indicates genus level and s_ species level.

2

Based on the latest nomenclature in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) taxonomy (January 2025), Prevotella copri is now named Segatella copri, and Bacteroides dorei is now named Phocaeicola dorei. The original nomenclatures are still used so the findings can be compared with other literatures where the original nomenclatures have been widely used.

Consistent with our findings for the TRPM7-associated microbiota (genera Prevotella and Bacteroides), in the untargeted analysis, we also found that Prevotella spp. (Prevotella copri), genus Bacteroides, and Bacteroides spp. (B faecis and Bacteroides dorei) were positively associated with metachronous adenoma/serrated polyp.

Effects of Mg treatment on the abundance of tumorigenic microbes identified from the untargeted approach

Next, we evaluated whether compared with the placebo arm, reducing intake Ca:Mg ratios to 2.3 through a personalized Mg treatment improved the abundance of microorganisms linked to risk of metachronous adenomas/serrated polyps using the untargeted approach. Again, we examined the effects in rectal mucosa, rectal swabs, and stool samples (Supplemental Table 6). Mg treatment reduced the abundance of P copri and Acidaminococcus spp in rectal swabs (P < 0.01), but it was not significant after FDR correction. These 2 microbes were associated with increased risk of metachronous polyps in those with the GA genotype of the TRPM7 gene. Mg treatment also reduced the abundance of B faecis in stool samples of patients with the GA genotype (P = 0.03), but it was not significant after FDR correction. In an exploratory untargeted analysis screening the changes of all taxa after treatment, no taxa were significant after adjusting for multiple hypotheses testing with an FDR cutoff of 0.1.

Discussion

In the PPCCT participants with a history colorectal adenoma/serrated of polyp, who consumed diets with the Ca:Mg intake ratio of ≥2.6, optimizing the Ca:Mg intake ratio from over 2.6 to 2.3 through Mg supplementation did not change any of the following biomarkers: necroptosis (pMLKL and TRPM7), inflammation (COX-2), apoptosis (TUNEL and BAX), and cell proliferation (Ki67). The TRPM7 polymorphism was significantly associated with overall microbiota assemblage in stool, rectal swab, and rectal mucosal samples. Specifically, the TPRM7 polymorphism was linked to altered relative abundances of Prevotella and Bacteroides in rectal swabs. Increased abundance of Prevotella in rectal mucosa was associated with nearly 3- to 4-fold increased risk of metachronous colorectal polyps, particularly metachronous adenomas. On the contrary, higher abundance of Bacteroides in swabs was prospectively linked to increased risk of metachronous serrated polyps. Optimizing the Ca:Mg intake ratio to 2.3 through Mg supplementation reduced the abundance of Prevotella in rectal swabs and Bacteroides in stool samples compared with the placebo. Furthermore, these effects were only observed in those with the GA genotype.

We used 3 different sample types to estimate the abundances of gut microbiota based on their distances from colorectal mucosa, including stool (the farthest), rectal swab (attached to), and rectal mucosa itself collected for all PPCCT participants [37,38]. Most previous studies have used stool samples and few used tissue samples [46,47]. The colon has the steepest oxygen gradient in the body, with anoxia sharply increasing from the mucosa to the middle of lumen and luminal microbes are more likely to be anaerobic than mucosal communities [37,38]. There is substantial variability in the assessment of the gut microbial community with different sample types [37,38]. Using stool, rectal swab, and rectal mucosa samples, we found multiple microbes from the 3 types of biospecimens were linked to metachronous adenoma/serrated polyps, with the highest number from rectal swabs that have not been widely used in gut microbial research. The rectal swabs are directly attached to gut epithelial cells, which are more responsive to the development of colorectal polyp. In addition, some of the microbes associated with polyp risk were unique in different sampling methods, suggesting that the choice of sampling method should be considered in future research studying the associations between microbiota and polyp risk.

We found that Prevotella in rectal mucosa and Bacteroides in rectal swabs were associated with metachronous adenomas and serrated polys, respectively. It is consistent with previous findings of cross-sectional studies that Prevotella and Bacteroides are among the most prominent colorectal cancer-associated bacteria [41,42]. In healthy individuals, a mucus gel layer envelops the mucosa, acting as a barrier that keeps the epithelial surface separated from luminal bacteria across the colon [48]. Sulfation of mucin provides enhanced protection from mucin-degrading bacteria without desulfating capacity [18,23] and reduces inflammation [24]. It was reported that some Bacteroides species are equipped with gene clusters termed polysaccharide utilization loci that encode all requisite functions to sensor and metabolize dietary and host mucin glycans [21]. Removing sulfate from sulfated mucin glycans is a rate-limiting process. A mucin-desulfating glycosidase was identified in Prevotella (e.g., strain RS2), indicating that some Prevotella species can desulfate sulfated mucin glycans by directly removing a sulfated sugar from mucin oligosaccharide chains [43,44]. Although Bacteriodes can also desulfate mucin glycans, the mucin-degrading power of Prevotella RS2 [18,23,43,44] was stronger than the protumorigenic Bacteroides fragilis [49]. Consistent with this finding, Prevotella spp. have been linked to localized and systemic inflammatory diseases and caused a stronger cytokine response than B fragilis [46,50]. Colonization of mouse gut microbiota with Prevotella spp. increased the host susceptibility to inflammation in mucosa [51]. We hypothesize that Prevotella might initiate the desulfation of sulfated mucin glycans in mucosa and the desulfated mucin glycans could be degraded by Bacteroides directly attached to mucosa that was sampled by rectal swabs.

Optimizing the Ca:Mg intake ratio to 2.3 from over 2.6 through Mg supplementation in this study significantly reduced the abundance of Bacteroides in stool samples and the abundance of Prevotella in rectal swabs, primarily among those with the GA genotype. This finding, together with the associations between Prevotella, Bacteroides, and risk of metachronous adenoma and serrated polyps, implied the role of gut microbiota in the previously reported association of Ca:Mg intake ratios, TRPM7 genotype, and risk of adenoma and serrated polyps [7,[29], [30], [31], [32], [33],52]. Gut microbiota could mediate the effect of Ca:Mg ratio through altering their bioavailability [53], which may contribute to the association between low Mg level and elevated risk of colorectal cancer [7,[54], [55], [56], [57]]. The desulfating enzymes in Prevotella and Bacteroides are highly conserved and depend on Ca concentration, but Mg can compete for Ca-binding sites when Mg levels are high [26,27]. Both high Ca:Mg intake ratios and the GA genotype are linked to Mg deficiency [7,[29], [30], [31], [32], [33],52], which may enhance the growth of desulfating bacteria in the mucin layer. Prevotella in rectal swabs and Bacteroides in stool samples were reduced by Mg treatment compared with those by the placebo arm. However, the intervention, which lasted for only 3 mo, may not be long enough to observe changes in other samples, and a longer treatment period is needed for future studies.

Among the taxa significantly associated with metachronous polyps from untargeted analysis, mucosal Blautia and R torques were less abundant in metachronous adenoma cases than controls. Both Blautia sp. and R torques are butyrate-producing bacteria [58] and decreased in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [59]. The abundances of Acidaminococcus in rectal tissues and rectal swabs and B faecis in rectal tissues and stool samples were more abundant in cases with metachronous polyps than those in controls. A recent study found that abundance of Acidaminococcus increased significantly in colorectal mucosa but not in stool samples in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases than that in controls [60]. Previous studies also observed that microbes belonging to genus Acidaminococcus can use glutamate as the only source of carbon and energy [61]. Glutamate plays an important role in restoring gut barrier function [62,63], and Acidaminococcus may hinder the restoration of gut barrier functions through metabolizing glutamate. The abundance of Roseburia was significantly associated with polyps and adenoma risks in stool samples. Similar to Prevotella and Bacteroides, Roseburia can degrade mucin and the species R. inulinivorans possesses extensive mucolytic functions [64].

The strengths of this study include its randomized, placebo-controlled design to evaluate the effect of optimizing the Ca:Mg intake ratio through Mg supplementation on gut microbiota. With a precision-based design, all background intakes of Mg and Ca from both diet and supplements were measured twice before and 4 times during the treatment, and a personalized dosing strategy of Mg supplementation was provided to each individual and the intake Ca:Mg ratios remained stable in both treatment and placebo arms during the trial. We had high compliance with the study medication, and the dropout rate was very low. In addition, we collected 3 types of gut microbial biospecimens including stool, rectal swabs, and rectal biopsies both before and after treatment.

This current study has limitations. The statistical power may not be sufficient for the analysis although, to our knowledge, this is one of the largest studies on TRPM7 genotype and microbiota. To address this for microbiome data not meeting the assumption of normal distribution, we used both nonparametric tests and linear models and used both targeted and exploratory untargeted approaches for the analysis and verified if the findings were consistent. We performed genotype-related analysis with both pretreatment and posttreatment time points to increase statistical power and verified that the changes of microbial taxa were consistent with those using only pretreatment time points (Supplemental Figure 9). Future studies with a larger sample size are needed to further verify the findings. This study also focused on the analysis at the microbial genus level because of their higher classification accuracy than that of the species level. Future studies identifying individual species with assembly or culture-based approach will provide more insights into the mechanisms of the microbial associations with TRPM7 genotype.

In conclusion, the abundance of Prevotella and Bacteroides was associated with TRPM7 genotype. Abundance of Prevotella in mucosa and Bacteroides in rectal swabs was associated with an increased risk of metachronous colorectal adenomas and serrated polyps, respectively. Reducing high Ca:Mg intake ratios to 2.3 through Mg supplementation also reduced the abundance of Prevotella in rectal swabs and Bacteroides in stool samples. In addition to Prevotella and Bacteroides, multiple microbes in rectal mucosa, rectal swabs, and/or stool samples were prospectively associated with risk of metachronous adenomas and serrated polyps. Optimizing the Ca:Mg intake ratio through Mg supplementation did not change the host biomarkers related to colorectal carcinogenesis in those who consumed diets with the Ca:Mg intake ratio of ≥2.6. In general, these findings indicate that optimizing the Ca:Mg intake ratio through Mg supplementation may alter the microbiota linked to both the TRPM7 genotype and risk of metachronous colorectal polyps but not the host response biomarkers (necroptosis and inflammation).

Author contributions

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows – QD, MJS: contributed to the hypothesis development and the study design; XZ, HJM, RMS, MAA-P, MJS, QD: conducted the research to acquire data; SS: processed the shotgun metagenome sequences for taxonomic and functional profiles and performed the multivariate analyses and the untargeted analysis between gut microbiota and polyp risk; XZ: performed the analyses of demographic characteristic, IHC biomarkers, targeted analysis between gut microbiota and polyp risk, and the effect of Mg treatment; TS: contributed to the IHC assay; XH, CY: contributed to statistical analyses; QD, XZ, SS: drafted the manuscript; and all authors: contributed to writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by R01CA149633 and R01CA202936 from the National Cancer Institute; R01DK110166 from National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Department of Health and Human Services; and the Ingram Cancer Center Endowment Fund. Data collection, sample storage, and processing for this study were partially conducted by the Survey and Biospecimen Shared Resource, which is supported in part by P30CA068485. Clinical visits to the Vanderbilt at the Clinical Research Center were supported in part by the Vanderbilt CTSA grant UL1 RR024975 from NCRR/NIH. The parent study data were stored in Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), and data analyses (VR12960) were supported in part by the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UL1TR000445). The UNC Microbiome Core is funded in part by the Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease (CGIBD P30 DK034987) and the UNC Nutrition Obesity Research Center (NORC P30 DK056350).

Conflict of interest

The author reports no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Douglas Seidner, MD, our beloved colleague, key coinvestigator of the project and long-term collaborator, had worked on the project for 12 years, but died during the development of this manuscript. Without him, our research work would not have been possible. We thank Dr Anthony Fodor for technical assistance, Dr Jay Fowke for his contribution to the study protocol for rectal biopsy, Regina Courtney for laboratory management, and John White for survey and recruitment efforts. We also thank Dr. Carsten Schmitz for providing DT40 (RRID:CVCL 0249) cell lines for selecting and validating anti-TRPM7 antibody.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.015.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (5.1MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Krapivinsky G., Krapivinsky L., Manasian Y., Clapham D.E. The TRPM7 chanzyme is cleaved to release a chromatin-modifying kinase. Cell. 2014;157(5):1061–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ryazanova L.V., Rondon L.J., Zierler S., Hu Z., Galli J., Yamaguchi T.P., et al. TRPM7 is essential for Mg2+ homeostasis in mammals. Nat. Commun. 2010;1(1):109. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hoenderop J.G., Bindels R.J. Epithelial Ca2+ and Mg2+ channels in health and disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005;16(1):15–26. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004070523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gotru S.K., Chen W., Kraft P., Becker I.C., Wolf K., Stritt S., et al. TRPM7 kinase controls calcium responses in arterial thrombosis and stroke in mice. Arterioscl. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018;38(2):344–352. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.310391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mittermeier L., Demirkhanyan L., Stadlbauer B., Breit A., Recordati C., Hilgendorff A., et al. TRPM7 is the central gatekeeper of intestinal mineral absorption essential for postnatal survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2019;116(10):4706–4715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810633116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hermosura M.C., Nayakanti H., Dorovkov M.V., Calderon F.R., Ryazanov A.G., Haymer D.S., et al. A TRPM7 variant shows altered sensitivity to magnesium that may contribute to the pathogenesis of two Guamanian neurodegenerative disorders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005;102(32):11510–11515. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505149102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dai Q., Shrubsole M.J., Ness R.M., Schlundt D., Cai Q., Smalley W.E., et al. The relation of magnesium and calcium intakes and a genetic polymorphism in the magnesium transporter to colorectal neoplasia risk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007;86(3):743–751. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.3.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Trapani V., Wolf F.I. Dysregulation of Mg2+ homeostasis contributes to acquisition of cancer hallmarks. Cell Calcium. 2019;83 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cai Z., Jitkaew S., Zhao J., Chiang H.-C., Choksi S., Liu J., et al. Plasma membrane translocation of trimerized MLKL protein is required for TNF-induced necroptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014;16(1):55–65. doi: 10.1038/ncb2883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pasparakis M., Vandenabeele P. Necroptosis and its role in inflammation. Nature. 2015;517(7534):311–320. doi: 10.1038/nature14191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Snyder A.G., Hubbard N.W., Messmer M.N., Kofman S.B., Hagan C.E., Orozco S.L., et al. Intratumoral activation of the necroptotic pathway components RIPK1 and RIPK3 potentiates antitumor immunity. Sci. Immunol. 2019;4(36) [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Riegler A.N., Brissac T., Gonzalez-Juarbe N., Orihuela C.J. Necroptotic cell death promotes adaptive immunity against colonizing pneumococci. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:615. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Parker D., Prince A. Immunoregulatory effects of necroptosis in bacterial infections. Cytokine. 2016;88:274–275. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Terzić J., Grivennikov S., Karin E., Karin M. Inflammation and colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(6):2101–2114.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schmitt M., Greten F.R. The inflammatory pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021;21(10):653–667. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00534-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Su T., Zhu X., Li Y., Yu C., Deng X., Shubin E., et al. Roles of necroptosis, apoptosis, and inflammation in colorectal carcinogenesis: a longitudinal human study. Cancer Prev. Res. 2025;18(2):93–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zeng M.Y., Inohara N., Nuñez G. Mechanisms of inflammation-driven bacterial dysbiosis in the gut. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10(1):18–26. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Derrien M., van Passel M.W., van de Bovenkamp J.H., Schipper R.G., de Vos W.M., Dekker J. Mucin-bacterial interactions in the human oral cavity and digestive tract. Gut Microbes. 2010;1(4):254–268. doi: 10.4161/gmic.1.4.12778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wheeler K.M., Cárcamo-Oyarce G., Turner B.S., Dellos-Nolan S., Co J.Y., Lehoux S., et al. Mucin glycans attenuate the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in infection. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4(12):2146–2154. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0581-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van Herreweghen F., De Paepe K., Roume H., Kerckhof F.-M., Van de Wiele T. Mucin degradation niche as a driver of microbiome composition and Akkermansia muciniphila abundance in a dynamic gut model is donor independent. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018;94(12) [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Martens E.C., Chiang H.C., Gordon J.I. Mucosal glycan foraging enhances fitness and transmission of a saccharolytic human gut bacterial symbiont. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;4(5):447–457. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pothuraju R., Chaudhary S., Rachagani S., Kaur S., Roy H.K., Bouvet M., et al. Mucins, gut microbiota, and postbiotics role in colorectal cancer. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kim J., Lee B., Lee J., Ji M., Park C.S., Lee J., et al. N-glycan modifications with negative charge in a natural polymer mucin from bovine submaxillary glands, and their structural role. Polymers. 2020;13(1):103. doi: 10.3390/polym13010103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tobisawa Y., Imai Y., Fukuda M., Kawashima H. Sulfation of colonic mucins by N-acetylglucosamine 6-O-sulfotransferase-2 and its protective function in experimental colitis in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285(9):6750–6760. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.067082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Desai M.S., Seekatz A.M., Koropatkin N.M., Kamada N., Hickey C.A., Wolter M., et al. A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility. Cell. 2016;167(5):1339–1353.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Demydchuk M., Hill C.H., Zhou A., Bunkóczi G., Stein P.E., Marchesan D., et al. Insights into Hunter syndrome from the structure of iduronate-2-sulfatase. Nat. Commun. 2017;8(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Berteau O., Guillot A., Benjdia A., Rabot S. A new type of bacterial sulfatase reveals a novel maturation pathway in prokaryotes. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281(32):22464–22470. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602504200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Iseri L.T., French J.H. Magnesium: nature’s physiologic calcium blocker. Am. Heart J. 1984;108(1):188–193. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(84)90572-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dai Q., Zhu X., Manson J.E., Song Y., Li X., Franke A.A., et al. Magnesium status and supplementation influence vitamin D status and metabolism: results from a randomized trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018;108(6):1249–1258. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu S., Liu Q. Personalized magnesium intervention to improve vitamin D metabolism: applying a systems approach for precision nutrition in large randomized trials of diverse populations. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018;108(6):1159–1161. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dai Q., Shu X.-O., Deng X., Xiang Y.-B., Li H., Yang G., et al. Modifying effect of calcium/magnesium intake ratio and mortality: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dai Q., Sandler R.S., Barry E.L., Summers R.W., Grau M.V., Baron J.A. Calcium, magnesium, and colorectal cancer. Epidemiology. 2012;23(3):504–505. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31824deb09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rosanoff A., Dai Q., Shapses S.A. Essential nutrient interactions: does low or suboptimal magnesium status interact with vitamin D and/or calcium status? Adv. Nutr. 2016;7(1):25–43. doi: 10.3945/an.115.008631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dai Q., Cantwell M.M., Murray L.J., Zheng W., Anderson L.A., Coleman H.G. Dietary magnesium, calcium: magnesium ratio and risk of reflux oesophagitis, Barrett’s oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a population-based case–control study. Br. J. Nutr. 2016;115(2):342–350. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515004444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhao J., Zhu X., Shrubsole M.J., Edwards T.L., Giovannucci E.L., Zheng W., et al. Calcium to magnesium intake ratio and colorectal carcinogenesis, results from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian cancer screening trial. Cancer Res. 2016;76(14_Supplement):1739. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao J., Giri A., Zhu X., Shrubsole M.J., Jiang Y., Guo X., et al. Calcium: magnesium intake ratio and colorectal carcinogenesis, results from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Br. J. Cancer. 2019;121(9):796–804. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0579-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jones R.B., Zhu X., Moan E., Murff H.J., Ness R.M., Seidner D.L., et al. Inter-niche and inter-individual variation in gut microbial community assessment using stool, rectal swab, and mucosal samples. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):4139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22408-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sun S., Zhu X., Huang X., Murff H.J., Ness R.M., Seidner D.L., et al. On the robustness of inference of association with the gut microbiota in stool, rectal swab and mucosal tissue samples. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Segata N., Waldron L., Ballarini A., Narasimhan V., Jousson O., Huttenhower C. Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nat. Methods. 2012;9(8):811–814. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Franzosa E.A., McIver L.J., Rahnavard G., Thompson L.R., Schirmer M., Weingart G., et al. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat. Methods. 2018;15(11):962–968. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0176-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ternes D., Karta J., Tsenkova M., Wilmes P., Haan S., Letellier E. Microbiome in colorectal cancer: how to get from meta-omics to mechanism? Trends Microbiol. 2020;28(5):401–423. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dejea C.M., Fathi P., Craig J.M., Boleij A., Taddese R., Geis A.L., et al. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis harbor colonic biofilms containing tumorigenic bacteria. Science. 2018;359(6375):592–597. doi: 10.1126/science.aah3648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rho J.H., Wright D.P., Christie D.L., Clinch K., Furneaux R.H., Roberton A.M. A novel mechanism for desulfation of mucin: identification and cloning of a mucin-desulfating glycosidase (sulfoglycosidase) from Prevotella strain RS2. J. Bacteriol. 2005;187(5):1543–1551. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.5.1543-1551.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wright D.P., Rosendale D.I., Roberton A.M. Prevotella enzymes involved in mucin oligosaccharide degradation and evidence for a small operon of genes expressed during growth on mucin. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000;190(1):73–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wright D.P., Knight C.G., Parkar S.G., Christie D.L., Roberton A.M. Cloning of a mucin-desulfating sulfatase gene from Prevotella strain RS2 and its expression using a Bacteroides recombinant system. J. Bacteriol. 2000;182(11):3002–3007. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.11.3002-3007.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Knippel R.J., Drewes J.L., Sears C.L. The cancer microbiome: recent highlights and knowledge gaps. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(10):2378–2395. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kordahi M.C., Stanaway I.B., Avril M., Chac D., Blanc M.-P., Ross B., et al. Genomic and functional characterization of a mucosal symbiont involved in early-stage colorectal cancer. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29(10):1589–1598.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Swidsinski A., Loening-Baucke V., Theissig F., Engelhardt H., Bengmark S., Koch S., et al. Comparative study of the intestinal mucus barrier in normal and inflamed colon. Gut. 2007;56(3):343–350. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.098160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Roberton A.M., Stanley R.A. In vitro utilization of mucin by Bacteroides fragilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982;43(2):325–330. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.2.325-330.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Larsen J.M. The immune response to Prevotella bacteria in chronic inflammatory disease. Immunology. 2017;151(4):363–374. doi: 10.1111/imm.12760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Iljazovic A., Roy U., Gálvez E.J., Lesker T.R., Zhao B., Gronow A., et al. Perturbation of the gut microbiome by Prevotella spp. enhances host susceptibility to mucosal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2021;14(1):113–124. doi: 10.1038/s41385-020-0296-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Costello R.B., Rosanoff A., Dai Q., Saldanha L.G., Potischman N.A. Perspective: characterization of dietary supplements containing calcium and magnesium and their respective ratio—is a rising ratio a cause for concern? Adv. Nutr. 2021;12(2):291–297. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bielik V., Kolisek M. Bioaccessibility and bioavailability of minerals in relation to a healthy gut microbiome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(13):6803. doi: 10.3390/ijms22136803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Polter E.J., Onyeaghala G., Lutsey P.L., Folsom A.R., Joshu C.E., Platz E.A., et al. Prospective association of serum and dietary magnesium with colorectal cancer incidence. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28(8):1292–1299. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhang X., Giovannucci E.L., Wu K., Smith-Warner S.A., Fuchs C.S., Pollak M., et al. Magnesium intake, plasma C-peptide, and colorectal cancer incidence in US women: a 28-year follow-up study. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;106(7):1335–1341. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Larsson S.C., Bergkvist L., Wolk A. Magnesium intake in relation to risk of colorectal cancer in women. JAMA. 2005;293(1):86–89. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.1.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Folsom A.R., Hong C.-P. Magnesium intake and reduced risk of colon cancer in a prospective study of women. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006;163(3):232–235. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Liu X., Mao B., Gu J., Wu J., Cui S., Wang G., et al. Blautia—a new functional genus with potential probiotic properties? Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhuang X., Liu C., Zhan S., Tian Z., Li N., Mao R., et al. Gut microbiota profile in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Front. Pediatr. 2021;9 [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Altomare A., Putignani L., Del Chierico F., Cocca S., Angeletti S., Ciccozzi M., et al. Gut mucosal-associated microbiota better discloses inflammatory bowel disease differential patterns than faecal microbiota. Dig. Liver Dis. 2019;51(5):648–656. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gough E.K., Stephens D.A., Moodie E.E., Prendergast A.J., Stoltzfus R.J., Humphrey J.H., et al. Linear growth faltering in infants is associated with Acidaminococcus sp. and community-level changes in the gut microbiota. Microbiome. 2015;3:24. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0089-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Beutheu S., Ghouzali I., Galas L., Déchelotte P., Coëffier M. Glutamine and arginine improve permeability and tight junction protein expression in methotrexate-treated Caco-2 cells. Clin. Nutr. 2013;32(5):863–869. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Le Bacquer O., Laboisse C., Darmaun D. Glutamine preserves protein synthesis and paracellular permeability in Caco-2 cells submitted to “luminal fasting.”. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2003;285(1):G128–G136. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00459.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Pichler M.J., Yamada C., Shuoker B., Alvarez-Silva C., Gotoh A., Leth M.L., et al. Butyrate producing colonic Clostridiales metabolise human milk oligosaccharides and cross feed on mucin via conserved pathways. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):3285. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17075-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (5.1MB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES