Skip to main content
Cell Transplantation logoLink to Cell Transplantation
. 2026 Jan 13;35:09636897251411597. doi: 10.1177/09636897251411597

Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model

Jian Jiang 1,2, Min Ji Lee 1,2, Daeun Lee 1,2, Kwi-Hoon Jang 2, Tae Woo Kim 2, Chris Hyunchul Jo 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC12799995  PMID: 41527861

Abstract

The effective application of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has the potential to enhance cartilage regeneration. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of intra-articular (IA) injections of small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells (smumf cells) combined with magnesium (Mg2+) in a rat model of full-thickness cartilage defects (FTDs). Adhesion of smumf cells was assessed on type I collagen-coated surfaces in vitro, in an uncontained ex vivo model, and via cell tracking in a rat FTD model. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated using histological analyses of macroscopic and microscopic in vivo (at 4 and 8 weeks, n = 6). Mg2+ improved the adhesion of smumf cells by up to 1.89-fold in the ex vivo model, and by 2.80-fold in cell tracking. A single injection of smumf cells alone improved histological scores by 2.33-fold at 4 weeks, whereas the combination with Mg2+ resulted in further improvements in both macroscopic (1.30-fold) and microscopic (1.26-fold) scores at 8 weeks. Moreover, the smumf cells + Mg2+ group showed significant increases in tissue thickness (1.40-fold), safranin O-positive area (2.88-fold), and type II collagen synthesis (1.22-fold) in rat model. This study demonstrates that a single IA injection of smumf cells combined with Mg² enhances cell homing and functional adhesion at the defect site, thereby promoting superior cartilage regeneration compared with smumf cells alone.

Keywords: small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells, mesenchymal stem cells, magnesium, articular cartilage, cartilage diseases


Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) has the highest global prevalence among all joint diseases and is characterized by the presence of cartilage defects, making early treatment crucial to prevent or delay disease progression1,2. Cartilage defects can generally be classified into three types based on the depth of the damage: osteochondral defect (OCD), full-thickness defect (FTD), and partial-thickness defect, each associated with a distinct microenvironment3,4. In FTD, an intact subchondral bone plate blocks the migration of endogenous bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM MSCs) into the defect area 5 . Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), whether autologous or allogeneic, have shown great potential in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders due to their immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and multipotent nature69. Recent evidence also suggests that stem cells exert paracrine effects, facilitating the endogenous reparative process by secreting numerous cytokines and growth factors 10 . The selection of the source of MSCs should meet the requirements for clinical applications. However, it is even more critical to isolate cells with both high quality and sufficient quantity and to culture them in a manner that preserves robust proliferative capacity while preventing cellular senescence 11 .

The use of autologous MSCs has been criticized for several disadvantages including invasive harvesting techniques, low collection efficiency, and decreased quality with donor age and comorbidities1215. Umbilical cord–derived MSCs (UC MSCs) are fetal MSCs isolated from umbilical cord tissue, which can overcome the limitations associated with MSCs derived from other tissues 16 . Over the past decade, UC MSCs have emerged as a dominant source of MSCs for clinical trials17,18. MSCs isolated from fetal tissues have been shown to secrete higher levels of growth factors than obtained from adult tissues19,20. Previous studies have established a suitable method for clinical scale production of MSCs from human umbilical cord tissue—namely, small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells (smumf cells), which demonstrate excellent proliferative capacity without transformation 11 . Moreover, studies have shown regenerative effects in tendon injury following injection of smumf cells, even without the use of carrier materials21,22. For cartilage regeneration, a few studies have shown regenerative potential using hyaluronic acid (HA) in an OCD animal model23,24. However, the regenerative efficacy of UC MSCs for cartilage defects via direct intra-articular (IA) injection has not yet been reported.

For clinical trials, key challenges extend beyond selecting an appropriate MSC type to include choosing suitable carrier for delivery into injured joints 25 . A strategy that facilitates the attachment of allogeneic MSCs to the lesion site through a clinically translatable method is crucial 26 . The direct cell-to-cell communication and paracrine signaling are considered key mechanisms in MSC-mediated regeneration 27 . Studies have shown that direct cell-to-cell contact between MSCs and chondrocytes may facilitate the deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) in cartilage tissue28,29. Moreover, reduced cell survival and engraftment rates lead to a diminished paracrine effect of the stem cells 30 . Therefore, rapid and sufficient adhesion of MSCs to the defect site is important after injection. In addition, IA injection of MSCs is a simple, minimally invasive, and efficient delivery procedure 31 . Research focusing on the homing and adhesion of UC MSCs is limited, particularly studies investigating the effects of rapid adhesion on cartilage regeneration. Among the candidate agents that may enhance adhesion potential of MSCs, an appropriate concentration of magnesium (Mg2+) has been shown to have potential under local adhesion 32 . Mg2+ is an important factor in both the growth and maintenance of live cells, which also enhances the adhesion of cells by integrin pathway 33 . Moreover, studies have confirmed Mg2+ injection promotes cartilage matrix synthesis and exhibits anti-inflammatory properties 34 . However, the combined effects of UC MSCs and Mg2+ on cartilage repair have not yet been investigated. The ultimate goal of MSC-based therapies is clinical translation; therefore, the translational relevance of the selected carrier must be considered. Mg2+-containing isotonic solutions are balanced electrolyte intravenous fluids that are used to provide volume replacement and correct electrolyte imbalances, and they may serve as an ideal carrier given their widespread clinical use and well-established safety profile 35 .

Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of smumf cells combined with Mg2+ in regenerating FTDs in a rat model. We hypothesized that the addition of Mg2+ would enhance cartilage regeneration through cell adhesion, resulting in superior macroscopic and histological outcomes compared to smumf cells treatment alone.

Materials and methods

The smumf cells isolation and cryopreservation

The institutional ethical review board approved tissue collection for this research. Human umbilical cords were obtained from healthy full-term deliveries by cesarean section after informed consent at SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (IRB No. 06–2011–211), and smumf cells were isolated and cultured using the minimal cube explant method 11 . The smumf cells were continuously cultured up to passage 8, and smumf cells were cryopreserved with a STEM-CELLBANKER® (ZENOGEN PHARMA CO., LTD., Fukushima, Japan) 36 . Cryovials were stored at −80°C in a deep-freezer and transferred to a −196°C liquid nitrogen tank for preservation for at least 1 month. For use in experiments, cryopreserved smumf cells were thawed immediately in the 37°C water bath within 1 min and cultured in a 5% CO2 incubator with humidified air at 37°C. The subculture protocol was the same as the smumf cells isolation protocol 11 . The smumf cells at passage 10 were used for all experiments, and characterization including morphology, growth kinetics, colony-forming-unit fibroblasts (CFU-F) assays, flow cytometry, and trilineage differentiation was performed as previously reported 37 .

The adhesion of smumf cells on type I collagen-coated surfaces

In vitro cell adhesion assay was performed on type I collagen-coated 96 well plates. The details are described in the Supplemental Material (S4). The detached smumf cells were resuspended with saline containing different doses of Mg2+ and Mg2+-containing isotonic solution (MgIS, Plasma solution-A, HK inno.N Co., Ltd., Cheongju, Korea). A total of 32,000 cells with carrier were injected per well, and the procedure was repeated in triplicate. The plate was incubated in a 5% CO2, 37°C incubator for 30 min, and then washed twice with Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline(DPBS). Cell viability was assessd using the EZ-CyTox cell viability assay kit (Daeil Lab Service, Seoul, Korea) with a 3-h incubation. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader to quantify the number of adhered cells. A standard curve was generated using the same procedure, and the number of adhered cells was calculated based on OD values. The cell morphologies were observed under a microscope (CKX53 Olympus culture microscope; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

The adhesion test of smumf cells in human osteochondral explant

Tissue collection was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center (IRB No. 30-2019-124). Human osteochondral samples were obtained from patients undergoing knee replacement surgery. Cylindrical osteochondral explants (4 mm in diameter, 4 mm in height) were extracted using a bur, and the cartilage layer was completely removed with a surgical blade to mimic a cartilage defect. A 2% agarose gel (Agarose MP, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was loaded into 48-well plates to a height of 4 mm. After solidification, a 4-mm diameter hole was created using a biopsy punch, and an osteochondral explant without the cartilage layer was inserted into the agarose hole (Fig. 1c). Depending on the group, smumf cells were suspended in different carriers—including saline, MgIS, HA (1%; LG Life Sciences, Seoul, Korea), and fibrin glue (FG; Tisseel, Baxter korea, Seoul, Korea) and injected into the wells. After the 30 min of incubation to cell adhesion, the explants were carefully removed and washed twice thoroughly with DPBS to eliminate unattached cells. The explants were then immersed in the EZ-CyTox cell viability assay kit and incubated for 1 h. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader to quantify the number of adhered cells. A standard curve was generated using the same procedure, and the number of adhered cells was calculated based on optical density (OD) values.

Figure 1.

Multi-part image with cells on collagen, organ explants, ex vivo model, and adhesion tests with bars and magnification views.

Cell adhesion test of smumf cells in vitro and ex vivo. (a) Morphology of smumf cells adhered to type I collagen condition; Scale bar:100 µm. (b) Quantitative analysis of smumf cells adhesion on type I collagen surface under varying concentrations of magnesium ions and Mg2+-containing isotonic solution (MgIS). (c) Schematic representation of bone explant preparation to the ex vivo model setup. (d) Comparative analysis of early adhesion in the ex vivo model. (e) Comparison of adhesion test using other carriers. Data represent mean ± standard deviation (SD); n > 5. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Animal model of FTD

All procedures were conducted following the ARRIVE guidelines and approved by the Institutional Animal Studies Committee (IACUC No. 2022-0016). Forty-eight healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats (12 weeks old, weight 360–380 g) were using for modeling surgery. Animals were anesthetized with zoletil and rompun (30 mg/kg + 10 mg/kg), and surgery was performed on the right hind limb only, following a unilateral design. A parapatellar medial surgical approach was used with lateral dislocation of the patella to expose the trochlear groove of the femur. The FTD model (defect: 1.75 mm × 1.5 mm, oval) was created by using a 1.5-mm biopsy punch. The cartilage defect was debrided using a biopsy curette to remove the calcified cartilage layer without damaging the subchondral bone and bleeding. The patella was relocated, and the joint capsule, subcutaneous tissue was closed layer by layer. All animals were allowed free cage activity before being sacrificed.

The cell tracking of PKH26 labeled-smumf cells in vivo

The smumf cells were labeled with the fluorescent PKH26 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol to facilitate in vivo cell trafficking 38 . The details are described in Supplemental Material (S4). After labeling, the cells were counted by hemocytometer, and confirmation of red fluorescence was obtained using a fluorescence microscope (Leica DMI 4000B, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) before injection 12 . For a cell-tracking study, six FTD model rats were divided into two groups (smumf cells or smumf cells + Mg2+) for tracking at 1 and 3 days after injection. For IA injection, 1 × 106 PKH26-labeled smumf cells were suspended in either saline or MgIS to a final volume of 100 μL. At 1 and 3 days after injection, the entire right knee joint was harvested (Supplemental Material S4). To evaluate the adhesion of PKH26-labeled smumf cells at defect sites, specimens were sectioned at 6 μm thickness using a freezing microtome (Leica CM3050S, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and carefully trimmed. Slides were mounted with VECTASHIELD® mounting medium containing 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA). High-magnification images (×100) of the defect sites were obtained using fluorescence microscopy, and PKH26-positive cells were counted per image.

In vivo study for IA injection of smumf cells

For in vivo study, 36 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups (n = 6 in each group for two time points) as follows: (1) FTD + MgIS (control group); (2) smumf cells + saline (smumf cells group); (3) smumf cells + MgIS (smumf cells + Mg2+ group). The cryo-preserved and cultured smumf cells were suspended in either saline or MgIS to a final volume of 1 × 106/100 μL. A 31-gauge needle was used to inject the cells through the patellar ligament into the IA space of the right knee. The control group was injected to 100-μL MgIS by the same protocol. Exclusion criteria included unexpected death, surgical or injection failure, severe local or systemic complications, inability to complete the follow-up period, or technical inadequacy of tissue samples for analysis.

Histological evaluation and immunohistochemical evaluation

Four and 8 weeks after the surgery, the animals were sacrificed. Tissues surrounding the trochlear groove were harvested, and macroscopic evaluations were independently performed in a blind manner by two researchers using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) macroscopic evaluation scoring system 39 . The distal femurs were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 48 h at 4°C, followed by decalcification in 5% formic acid (Biosesang, Korea) for 3–4 days. After decalcification, tissues were embedded in paraffin, and serial sections of 4 µm thickness were prepared. For microscopic evaluation, slides were stained with safranin-O and fast green (Saf’O), observed under light microscopy, and assessed independently by two blinded researchers according to the O’Driscoll histologic grading system 40 . For glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) content analysis, the initial cartilage defect area, the total area of regenerated tissue filling the defect, and the Saf’O-positive stained areas within the regenerated tissue were measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Behesda, MD, USA). Values for total regenerated tissue were expressed as percentages relative to the original cartilage defect area (set as 100%). Values for Saf’O-positive areas were expressed as percentages of the total regenerated tissue. For measurement of thickness, the initial cartilage thickness, the total thickness of regenerated tissue was measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Behesda, MD, USA). Thickness values of regenerated tissue were expressed as percentages of initial cartilage thickness (set as 100%).

The same measurement method was used to quantify collagen-positive areas within the regenerated tissue 38 . For immunohistochemistry (IHC), slides were blocked with Superblock (Scytek, Logan, UT, USA; NC944219), incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against Collagen I (LSBio, Seattle, WA, USA; LS-C343921-100) or Collagen II (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; ab34712), and subsequently incubated with secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG, HRP(horseradish peroxidase)-linked antibody, Cell Signaling, 7074) at room temperature for 30 min. Finally, sections were incubated with Liquid DAB+ substrate (GBI Labs, Rockville, MD, USA; C09-100) for detection of HRP enzyme activity, dehydrated, and mounted.

Analysis of short-term repeat

To identify the human-derived gene of the repair tissue at 8 weeks, genomic DNA was isolated from rat cartilage tissue from the smumf cells + Mg2+ group. DNA amplification and genotyping were performed using the AmpFlSTR® Identifiler® PCR Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The prepared samples were loaded into the appropriate wells of a genetic analyzer plate and analyzed using a 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The resulting data were processed using GeneMapper ID-X Software (Applied Biosystems).

Statistics

Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The t test was used for statistical analysis of in vitro and ex vivo studies, results of histological evaluations were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test followed by Bonferroni corrections. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Adhesion of smumf cells on type I collagen-coated surface in vitro

After 30 min of initial adhesion, smumf cells exhibited a rounded morphology while adhering to the type I collagen-coated plate surfaces. A greater number of round-adhered cells were observed in the Mg2+ and MgIS groups compared to the control group (Fig. 1a). Quantitative analysis revealed that Mg2+ enhanced smumf cells adhesion by 3.26- to 4.49-fold (P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the different Mg2+ ion concentrations and the MgIS group (Fig. 1b).

Adhesion of smumf cells to human osteochondral explants ex vivo

In an ex vivo model using human bone explants, the MgIS group showed a 1.46-fold and 1.87-fold increase in cell adhesion at 0.5 h and 1 h, respectively, compared to the control group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1d). In comparison of cell adhesion among different carrier types, the MgIS group demonstrated a 1.89-fold increase compared to the HA group and a 1.39-fold increase compared to the FG group (Fig. 1e). The differences in adhesion between MgIS and both HA and FG groups were statistically significant.

In vivo tracking image of smumf cells after IA injection

PKH26-labeled smumf cells were clearly observed on the defect surface and remained detectable at the site on day 3 (Fig. 2b). One day after injection, in the smumf cells group, the average number of PKH26-positive cells was 20.33 ± 5.68/0.05 mm², whereas in the smumf cells + Mg2+ group, it increased to 28.0 ± 6.55/0.05 mm². Although the number of PKH26-positive cells in the smumf cells + Mg2+ group showed a 1.38-fold increase compared to that in the smumf cells group, the difference was not statistically significant. Three days after injection, the number of PKH26-positive cells in the smumf cells + Mg2+ group increased to 50.3 ± 17.01/0.05 mm2, showing a more than 2.80-fold increase compared to the smumf cells group (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2c).

Figure 2.

Experiment with labeled smumf cells in rats; microscopic photos and PKH26-positive cell plots at 1 and 3 days; bar graph shows more PKH26-positive cells at 3 days.

Cell tracking of labeled smumf cells after IA injection in a rat model. (a) Gross morphology of in vivo samples and microscopic images; scale bar: 2 mm. (b) Tracking of smumf cells at early time points after intra-articular injection; scale bar: 50 µm. (c) Quantification of smumf cells exhibiting PKH26-positive cells at the defect site. Data represent mean ± SD; n = 3, **P < 0.01.

Histological outcomes at 4 weeks after the IA injection

At 4 weeks after the injection, the defects in the control group were still depressed, although reparative tissue filled the defect site partially in best case. However, the filled tissue appeared opaque or showed irregularity of the articular surface, and the borders of the defect remained visible in all cases (Fig. 3a). In contrast, the defects in both smumf cells–treated groups were nearly completely filled with repaired tissue, and the neo-cartilage-like tissue was observed in all cases. Unlike the control groups, the tissues exhibited a transparent, shiny, and smooth articular surface and were integrated with the adjacent tissue. The ICRS macroscopic score showed significantly worse repair in the control group than in the other two smumf cells groups at 4 weeks. The macroscopic scores in the two smumf cells–treated groups were higher than those in the control group (2.83 ± 1.47 vs 6.6 ± 1.14, P < 0.01; vs 6.33 ± 1.37, P < 0.05) at 4 weeks (Fig. 3b). In addition, the heatmap of ICRS scores provided the numerical distribution of reparative levels the best, moderate, or worst outcomes in each group. Treatment with smumf cells improves the overall regenerative effects compared to the control group (Fig. 3c). For microscopic evaluation, the control group showed irregular thickness and cracks in the defect, along with hypocellularity at the integration sites. In contrast, the smumf cells group exhibited more GAGs content, which integrated well with the surrounding cartilage and subchondral bone. Surprisingly, the smumf cells + Mg2+ group exhibited nearly normal hyaline cartilage structures with rich GAGs content and a smooth surface in both the best and moderate cases. Even in the worst case, GAGs content was observed compared to that in the other groups. In addition, the repaired tissue remained intact in the subchondral bone region and integrated with the normal cartilage. In total O’Driscoll scores, both the smumf cells and smumf cells + Mg2+ groups showed significant differences compared to the control group (10.33 + 1.21 vs 15.00 + 2.35, P < 0.05; vs 15.83 + 3.19, P < 0.01) (Fig. 3d). However, no statistically difference was observed between the two smumf cells–treated groups at 4 weeks. The heatmap of O’Driscoll scores provided the numerical distribution of reparative levels the best, moderate, and worst outcomes in each group (Fig. 3e). Treatment with smumf cells improved the overall regenerative effects, similar to the macroscopic outcomes in each case. In particular, the smumf cells + Mg2+ group demonstrated markedly higher scores in the Saf’O and cellular parameters compared to the control group (1.67 + 0.82 vs 0.00 + 0.00, P < 0.01), while the smumf cells group showed significantly higher thickness than the control group (1.60 + 0.55 vs 0.33 + 0.52, P < 0.05) (Supplemental Table S1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Histological evaluation of articular cartilage defects regenerated using smumf cells at 4 weeks after injection. (a) Macroscopic images representing the best, moderate, and worst outcomes in each group; scale bar: 2 mm. (b) Total International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scores; n = 6. (c) Heatmap visualization of ICRS scores corresponding to the best, moderate, and worst outcomes. (d) Total O’Driscoll scores; n = 6. (e) Heatmap visualization of O’Driscoll scores corresponding to the best, moderate, and worst outcomes. (f) Representative microscopic images of best, moderate, and worst outcomes in each group; scale bar: 500 µm. (g) Immunohistochemical staining for type II collagen expression; scale bar: 500 µm. n = 3. Data are represented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Histological outcomes at 8 weeks after IA injection

At 8 weeks after injection, the defects were macroscopically filled to the original cartilage height in the control group, but defects or cracks were observed in the filled tissue (Fig. 4a). In contrast, the defects in both smumf cells–treated groups remained nearly completely filled, and the tissues also exhibited a transparent, shiny, and smooth articular surface in all cases. The ICRS macroscopic score showed the best repair remaining in the smumf cells + Mg2+ group, which was higher than that in the control group at 8 weeks (9.00 ± 1.26 vs 4.83 ± 1.17, P < 0.01) (Fig. 4b). In addition, the heatmap of ICRS scores demonstrated that the smumf cells + Mg2+ group showed improved overall regenerative effects compared to the control group (Fig. 4c). For microscopic evaluation, the control group exhibited poor GAGs content and obvious cracks in the repaired tissue at the center or at integration sites (Fig. 4f). In addition, abnormal subchondral bone bonding and hypocellularity were also observed in the worst case. Although the smumf cells group exhibited less GAGs content and cracks with an irregular thickness, it remained well integrated with the surrounding tissue and subchondral bone. In contrast, the smumf cells + Mg2+ group exhibited nearly normal thickness, maintaining a smooth surface in both the best and moderate cases. In the worst case, there was irregular thickness in the center, but hypocellularity or abnormal integration with the normal cartilage was not observed. The smumf cells + Mg2+ group showed significant differences in total O’Driscoll scores compared to the control group (15.14 ± 1.26 vs 9.33 ± 2.42, P < 0.01) (Fig. 4d). In the sub-parameters, the smumf cells + Mg2+ group exhibited significantly higher scores in cellularity (P < 0.05), surface, and thickness (P < 0.01) than the control group (P < 0.01) (Supplemental Table S1). The heatmap of O’Driscoll scores demonstrated that the smumf cells + Mg2+ group showed improved overall regenerative effects compared to the other groups (Fig. 4e).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Histological evaluation of articular cartilage defects regenerated using smumf cells at 8 weeks after injection. (a) Macroscopic images representing the best, moderate, and worst outcomes in each group; scale bar: 2 mm. (b) Total International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scores; n = 6. (c) Heatmap visualization of ICRS scores corresponding to the best, moderate, and worst outcomes. (d) Total O’Driscoll scores; n = 6. (e) Heatmap visualization of O’Driscoll scores corresponding to the best, moderate, and worst outcomes. (f) Representative microscopic images of best, moderate, and worst outcomes in each group; scale bar: 500 µm. (g) Immunohistochemical staining for type II collagen expression; scale bar: 500 µm. Data are represented as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Quantitative analysis of regenerated tissue at 4 and 8 weeks

For the quantitative quality of the repaired tissue, the smumf cells + Mg2+ group exhibited superior hyaline-like cartilage formation (Fig. 5a), which was significantly thicker (64.21% vs 38.74%, P < 0.05) and had richer Saf’O positive area than the control group (42.83% vs 3.05%, P < 0.01) and the smumf cells group at 4 weeks (vs 14.52%, P < 0.01) (Fig. 5b, c). Type II collagen formation showed no significant difference among all groups (Fig. 5d), and the same was observed for type I collagen at 4 weeks (Supplemental Fig. S2). However, the smumf cells + Mg2+ group exhibited significantly superior type II collagen formation (69.52% vs 42.84%, P < 0.05) and tissue thickness (68.78% vs 35.29%, P < 0.01) than the control group at 8 weeks (Fig. 5f, h).

Figure 5.

Microscopic images of cartilage regeneration, thickness metrics over 4 and 8 weeks, type II collagen expression, and statistical data on cartilage repair, plus immunohistochemistry, all depicted and compared in scientific study.

Quantitative analysis of articular cartilage defects regenerated using smumf cells at 4 and 8 weeks after injection. (a) Microscopic images showing regenerated tissue thickness and GAGs content in the best outcomes of each group; scale bar: 250 µm. (b) Percentage of normal cartilage thickness repaired in regenerated tissue. (c) Percentage of Safranin O-positive area in regenerated tissue. (d) Immunohistochemical analysis showing areas positive for type II collagen; n = 3. (e) Microscopic images showing regenerated tissue thickness and type II collagen expression of each group; scale bar: 250 µm. (f) Percentage of normal cartilage thickness repaired in regenerated tissue. (g) Percentage of Safranin O-positive area in regenerated tissue. (h) Immunohistochemical analysis showing areas positive for type II collagen; n = 3. Data are represented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Short Tandem Repeat analysis

At the final time point, no human-specific short tandem repeat (STR) profiles were detected in the smumf cells + Mg2+ group. Detailed information can be found in the accompanying report (Supplemental data S3).

Discussion

The most important findings of this study were that Mg2+ increased the adhesion of smumf cells in an ex vivo model and enhanced their local homing and adhesion to the defect site in a rat model. In the in vivo study, a single injection of smumf cells improved histological outcomes, and the combination with Mg2+ further enhanced regenerative effects, showing significant increases in tissue thickness, Safranin O–positive area, and type II collagen–positive area compared with the smumf cell group. Taken together, these findings suggest that Mg2+ enhances the homing and initial adhesion of smumf cells within cartilage defects. Furthermore, while a single injection of smumf cells can promote cartilage regeneration through endogenous regenerative process in the rat FTD model, the combination with Mg2+ further improves both the quantity (tissue thickness) and quality (GAGs synthesis and type II collagen deposition) of the regenerated tissue.

Magnesium is an important factor in both the growth and maintenance of live cells, and it also enhances the adhesion of cells by integrin pathway 33 . Mg2+ concentrations of 1.25–10 mM were shown to promote rabbit chondrocyte proliferation in culture, and 10 mM Mg2+ in an OCD ex vivo model increased the number of adherent synovial-derived MSCs approximately 2-fold compared to Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)32,41. To mimic the homing process within a joint cavity, we developed an uncontained ex vivo model that simulates cell homing and targeted attachment to the defect surface rather than local adhesion (Fig. 3c). The smumf cells suspended in MgIS—a clinically applicable carrier containing 3.15 mM Mg2+ and without Ca2+—were injected into the ex vivo model to compare their initial attachment ability. We first compared the early adhesive rates of smumf cells on type I collagen-coated plates, which simulated FTD surface condition, and observed no significant differences among the different concentrations of Mg2+, also including MgIS. Compared with the other carriers, HA and FG, the MgIS group also showed a significant increase in cell adhesion. HA serves as a scaffold with anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects, and FG enhances MSC viability and tissue adhesion but is technically challenging to deliver via minimally invasive IA injection42,43. Increasing evidence supports that mitochondrial dysfunction plays an essential role in MSC senescence, also impacting the quantity and quality of MSCs and limiting their clinical use44,45. Meanwhile, mitochondrial loss in MSCs can decrease their secretory capacity and interfere with cytokine secretion46,47. In our study, tracking of PKH26-labeled smumf cells showed increased retention when combined with Mg2+, with signals detected at the lesion site for up to 3 days in the rat FTD model. Using a mitochondrial activity assay to confirm MSC adhesion, rather than cell counting, demonstrates that the cells are not just physically attached but are also viable and functionally adhering to the surface. Although most of the injected cells may adhere to the synovial tissue rather than the cartilage, the regenerative effect is likely to depend more directly on the direct adhesion of MSCs to the defect site 48 . Such adhesion is of particular importance because, only after MSCs adhere to a target site, they release various paracrine factors with immunomodulatory, angiogenic, and antiapoptotic properties, all of which exert therapeutic effects on cartilage tissue49,50. Collectively, these data confirm that smumf cells successfully homed to and persisted at the defect site even in vivo, and we further demonstrate that Mg2+ enhanced the initial attachment capacity of the injected smumf cells rather than merely causing them to be physically attached.

For cartilage defects, increased thickness or volume of regenerated tissue can provide additional mechanical support to the joint, which will result in improved function and reduced pain51,52. Clinical studies have shown that patients with thinner fibrocartilage repair tissue are more susceptible to subsequent cartilage degeneration 52 . Several studies have demonstrated that, without scaffolds, achieving sufficient tissue thickness to adequately fill the defect remains challenging53,54. However, the use of scaffolds may often lead to the invasion of bony structures into the repaired cartilage, causing the cartilage to become thinner than the surrounding normal articular cartilage 54 . In contrast, the use of scaffold-free carriers for MSC administration may minimize the potential impact on the surrounding microenvironment or the implanted MSCs 55 . In our animal experiments, smumf cells—either alone or in combination with an MgIS—were injected into rat FTDs, and cartilage regeneration was first observed at 4 weeks after single injection. As observed in the best and moderate histological images, the defects in both smumf cells–treated groups were uniformly filled and resembled the surrounding normal articular cartilage. Notably, by 8 weeks, the smumf cells + Mg2+ group exhibited a significantly greater thickness in the regenerated tissue—up to 1.95-fold—compared to the control group. When human MSCs are used for cell therapy, extensive preclinical culture expansion inevitably drives the cells toward replicative “aging,” leading a consequent decline in quality 56 . These cells display senescence signatures, including reduced proliferative and immunosuppressive capacity, weakened regenerative potential, and proinflammatory features56,57. Our previous study reported that when smumf cells were cultured up to passage 10, no difference was observed in the expression of p16, p21, or p53, whereas the expression levels of these genes were significantly increased in BM MSCs 11 . Research also demonstrates that aged BM MSCs produce significantly less cartilage matrix than younger cells 58 . Unlike aged MSCs, which tend to produce fibrocartilage rather than hyaline cartilage, the smumf cells used in this study may not have this limitation 58 . These findings suggest that injection of smumf cells not only promotes regeneration and restores the thickness of defects, when combined with Mg2+, it also prevents further degradation of the newly formed tissue.

Articular cartilage is a type of hyaline cartilage that is rich in aggrecan and type II collagen, which provide compressive, tensile, and shear strength 38 . GAGs contained within aggrecan also play a vital role in ECM assembly, influencing the mechanical properties of cartilage 59 . At later stages, insufficient type II collagen formation may lead to the formation of fibrocartilage instead of hyaline cartilage, thereby compromising long-term functional integrity 60 . It remains unclear whether there is a specific temporal relationship between GAGs deposition and collagen formation; however, both are closely associated with the functional properties and quality of the regenerated tissue. In canine OCD model, the combined treatment of microfracture (MFx) and ultra-purified alginate gel resulted in an Saf-O positive area that was nearly 3-fold more than that of the control group at 27 weeks 61 . In addition, enriched type II collagen was observed; however, the majority of it was localized in the subchondral bone region rather than the cartilage layer. In another study using a rabbit OCD model, synovial MSCs were delivered either via IA injection or through a local adherent method 62 . Although more cartilage matrix was observed in the IA group at an early time point, the defects were filled with fibrous tissue and showed minimal GAGs formation by a late timepoint. Magnesium has been shown to promote not only cell adhesion but also the anabolic synthesis of GAGs 63 . Previous studies have reported that Mg2+ concentrations within the range of 2–5 mM exhibit significant effects on GAGs production and cartilage regeneration, suggesting this range as an optimal concentration for such biological activities 64 . In an additional in vivo study, the combination of MFx with magnesium injection demonstrated that a Mg2+ injection dose of 0.5 mol/L was the most effective in enhancing MFx-mediated cartilage repair 65 . However, the study employed a multi-injection protocol (three times) and showed a type II collagen–positive rate of approximately 50% at the late time point. Although differences in animal species and defect models may have influenced the outcomes, the OCD model is generally expected to produce superior regenerative effects 64 . In our study of the rat FTD model, the smumf cells group showed a 4.76-fold increase in GAGs synesis compared to the control group. Notably, the smumf cells + Mg2+ group showed a significant 14.0-fold increase at 4 weeks, indicating a pronounced early enhancement in cartilage matrix synthesis. In this study, a relatively small number of cells (1 million smumf cells delivered via a single injection) was sufficient to achieve effective adhesion at the defect site, leading to increased GAG synthesis at early time points and a marked improvement in type II collagen formation (69.52%) within the cartilage region. These findings indicate that a single IA injection of smumf cells, when combined with Mg2+ as a carrier, further improves the quality of the regenerated tissue.

The STR analysis revealed that the origin of the cells from regenerated tissue was not human-derived, consistent with the findings reported in previous references 66 . Studies have demonstrated that positive effects of MSCs come from the paracrine mechanism by secretion of cytokines and growth factors 66 . Consistent with these findings, our study and several others observed that although the injected smumf cells gradually disappeared over time, the local environment modulated by the smumf cells may continue to exert tissue regenerative effects. On the other hand, the anti-inflammatory effects are also involved in tissue regeneration. Previous studies have shown that the conditioned medium from smumf cells contains elevated levels of bioactive factors related to inflammation, such as interleukin-4 (IL-4, 28.58-fold increase) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF, 16.78-fold increase), compared to the control 11 . Moreover, MSCs possess the ability to modulate the local inflammatory environment by inducing macrophage recruitment and polarization 67 . This is particularly relevant, as inflammation and cartilage damage are accompanied by the degradation of type II collagen, with these localized lesions being primarily mediated by macrophages 68 . Although the mechanisms by which smumf cells modulate IA macrophages to improve the inflammatory microenvironment remain unclear, further investigation is required. Taken together, the exact mechanism by which the injected and adhered smumf cells form articular cartilage would be through endogenous regeneration, not by direct differentiation of the injected cells.

There are several limitations to this study. First, we primarily focused on early cell adhesion and did not perform long-term tracking of the fate of the injected MSCs. Although STR analysis was performed at the final regeneration time point to detect the presence of human-derived gene, this approach was insufficient to fully elucidate the contribution of the injected smumf cells to the regenerated tissue, and long-term tracking and more sensitive fate mapping approaches will be needed for further studies. Second, as mentioned earlier that inflammation modulation also plays a crucial role in tissue regeneration, our study did not directly assess the anti-inflammatory effects of smumf cells. Comparative analyses involving synovial tissue or synovial fluid were not performed. These concerns need to be addressed through further studies to comprehensively evaluate both the regenerative mechanisms and the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs prior to considering their clinical application. Third, future studies should incorporate functional evaluations to provide a more comprehensive understanding of therapeutic efficacy. Finally, because the study used a small-animal preclinical model, validation in larger animal models will be required before translation to clinical application.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that a single IA injection of smumf cells combined with Mg2+ improves cell homing and functional adhesion to defect site, leading to superior macroscopic and histological outcomes compared to smumf cells treatment alone.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 – Supplemental material for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model by Jian Jiang, Min Ji Lee, Daeun Lee, Kwi-Hoon Jang, Tae Woo Kim and Chris Hyunchul Jo in Cell Transplantation

sj-docx-2-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 – Supplemental material for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model by Jian Jiang, Min Ji Lee, Daeun Lee, Kwi-Hoon Jang, Tae Woo Kim and Chris Hyunchul Jo in Cell Transplantation

sj-docx-4-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 – Supplemental material for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model

Supplemental material, sj-docx-4-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model by Jian Jiang, Min Ji Lee, Daeun Lee, Kwi-Hoon Jang, Tae Woo Kim and Chris Hyunchul Jo in Cell Transplantation

sj-tif-3-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 – Supplemental material for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model

Supplemental material, sj-tif-3-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model by Jian Jiang, Min Ji Lee, Daeun Lee, Kwi-Hoon Jang, Tae Woo Kim and Chris Hyunchul Jo in Cell Transplantation

Footnotes

Ethical Considerations: Human umbilical cords were obtained from healthy full-term deliveries by cesarean section under the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center (IRB No. 06–2011–211, approval data: 2012-02-18), and after written informed consent was obtained. All donors received a full explanation of the study purpose, procedures, and potential risks.

Author contributions: Jian Jiang: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft. Min Ji Lee, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology. Daeun Lee, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology. Kwi-Hoon Jang, Project administration, Writing—editing. Tae Woo Kim: Investigation, Methodology. Chris Hyunchul Jo: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing—review & editing.

Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by a grant (2022R1A2C2092854, RS-2025-16071722) of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korea government (MSIT), a grant (22C0608L1) of the Korean Fund for Regenerative Medicine funded by Ministry of Science and ICT and Ministry of Health and Welfare, a grant (RS-2023-00302383) from Technology and Information Promotion Agency funded by Ministry of SMEs and Startups, a grant (S3283968) of the Technology Development Program funded by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups.

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Chris Jo owns shares of AcesoStem Biostrategies Inc. The other authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Data availability statement: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Statement of human and animal rights: Human bone tissue collection was also approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center (IRB No. 30-2019-124, approval data: 2019-11-08). The animal protocol of this study has been approved by the Institutional Animal Studies Committee (IACUC No. 2022-0016, approve data: 2021-07-07).

Statement of informed consent: Written informed consent for the collection and research use of umbilical cord tissue was obtained from all participating mothers prior to sample acquisition.

Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  • 1. Bi Z, Cai Y, Sun C, Shi X, Liao S, Liu J. Different radiological indices of patellar height predict patients’ diverse outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2024;16(5):741–50. doi: 10.4055/cios23346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Schäfer N, Grässel S. New refinements aim to optimize articular cartilage tissue engineering. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023;19(2):66–67. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-00889-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Liao J, Tian T, Shi S, Xie X, Ma Q, Li G, Lin Y. The fabrication of biomimetic biphasic CAN-PAC hydrogel with a seamless interfacial layer applied in osteochondral defect repair. Bone Res. 2017;5:17018. doi: 10.1038/boneres.2017.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wei W, Ma Y, Yao X, Zhou W, Wang X, Li C, Lin J, He Q, Leptihn S, Ouyang H. Advanced hydrogels for the repair of cartilage defects and regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(4):998–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zhang W, Chen J, Tao J, Jiang Y, Hu C, Huang L, Ji J, Ouyang HW. The use of type 1 collagen scaffold containing stromal cell-derived factor-1 to create a matrix environment conducive to partial-thickness cartilage defects repair. Biomaterials. 2013;34(3):713–23. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Li Y, Han Q, Chen Y, Huang W, Chen Y, Wu Z, Tan F, Liu M, Zou J. Effect of intraarticular human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells transplantation on cartilage degradation and matrix metalloproteinases in OA rat model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025;26(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08797-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nakao Y, Fukuda T, Zhang Q, Sanui T, Shinjo T, Kou X, Chen C, Liu D, Watanabe Y, Hayashi C, Yamato H, et al. Exosomes from TNF-α-treated human gingiva-derived MSCs enhance M2 macrophage polarization and inhibit periodontal bone loss. Acta Biomater. 2021;122:306–24. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kushioka J, Chow SK-H, Toya M, Tsubosaka M, Shen H, Gao Q, Li X, Zhang N, Goodman SB. Bone regeneration in inflammation with aging and cell-based immunomodulatory therapy. Inflamm Regen. 2023;43(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s41232-023-00279-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, Rybak Z. Stem cells: past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1165-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Żylińska B, Silmanowicz P, Sobczyńska-Rak A, Jarosz Ł, Szponder T. Treatment of articular cartilage defects: focus on tissue engineering. In Vivo. 2018;32(6):1289–1300. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lee AY, Jang KH, Jo CH. Minimal cube explant provides optimal isolation condition of mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2022;19(4):793–807. doi: 10.1007/s13770-022-00440-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lee MJ, Jiang J, Kim SH, Jo CH. Second generation multiple channeling using platelet-rich plasma enhances cartilage repair through recruitment of endogenous MSCs in bone marrow. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2024;13(12):1213–27. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szae075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Song JS, Hong KT, Kim NM, Park HS, Choi NH. Human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell implantation for osteoarthritis of the knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(4):503–509. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03349-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Saha A, Shah S, Waknis P, Bhujbal P, Aher S, Vaswani V. Comparison of minimally invasive versus conventional open harvesting technique for iliac bone graft in secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft palate patients: a systematic review. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;45(5):241–53. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.5.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yea JH, Kim Y, Jo CH. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, and umbilical cord tissue in regeneration of a full-thickness tendon defect in vitro and in vivo. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2023;34:101486. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2023.101486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Troyer DL, Weiss ML. Wharton’s jelly-derived cells are a primitive stromal cell population. Stem Cells. 2008;26(3):591–99. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Matas J, Orrego M, Amenabar D, Infante C, Tapia-Limonchi R, Cadiz MI, Alcayaga-Miranda F, González PL, Muse E, Khoury M, Figueroa FE, et al. Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) for knee osteoarthritis: repeated MSC dosing is superior to a single MSC dose and to hyaluronic acid in a controlled randomized phase I/II trial. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8(3):215–24. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Couto PS, Shatirishvili G, Bersenev A, Verter F. First decade of clinical trials and published studies with mesenchymal stromal cells from umbilical cord tissue. Regen Med. 2019;14(4):309–19. doi: 10.2217/rme-2018-0171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Klüter H, Bieback K. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells (Dayton, Ohio). 2006;24(5):1294–1301. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Amable PR, Teixeira MVT, Carias RBV, Granjeiro JM, Borojevic R. Protein synthesis and secretion in human mesenchymal cells derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue and Wharton’s jelly. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5(2):53. doi: 10.1186/scrt442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Yea J-H, Bae TS, Kim BJ, Cho YW, Jo CH. Regeneration of the rotator cuff tendon-to-bone interface using umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells and gradient extracellular matrix scaffolds from adipose tissue in a rat model. Acta Biomater. 2020;114:104–16. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yea JH, Jo CH. Dose- and sex-dependent effects on umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell efficacy in regeneration of a full-thickness tendon defect in a rat model. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025;28(1):49–59. doi: 10.5397/cise.2024.00626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wu KC, Chang YH, Liu HW, Ding DC. Transplanting human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and hyaluronate hydrogel repairs cartilage of osteoarthritis in the minipig model. Tzu Chi Med J. 2019;31(1):11–19. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_87_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Łabędź-Masłowska A, Wieczorek J, Mierzwiński M, Sekuła-Stryjewska M, Noga S, Rajca J, Duda P, Milian-Ciesielska K, Karnas E, Kmiotek-Caller K, Szkaradek A, et al. Evaluation of the safety and regenerative potential of human mesenchymal stem cells and their extracellular vesicles in a transgenic pig model of cartilage—bone injury in vivo—preclinical study. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2025;21(4):1075–95. doi: 10.1007/s12015-025-10853-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zhang R, Ma J, Han J, Zhang W, Ma J. Mesenchymal stem cell related therapies for cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(10):6275–89. http://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31737182/. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zhang J, Huang X, Wang H, Liu X, Zhang T, Wang Y, Hu D. The challenges and promises of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for use as a cell-based therapy. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:234. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0240-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Liang X, Ding Y, Zhang Y, Tse HF, Lian Q. Paracrine mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy: current status and perspectives. Cell Transplant. 2014;23(9):1045–59. doi: 10.3727/096368913X667709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Wu L, Leijten JC, Georgi N, Post JN, van Blitterswijk CA, Karperien M. Trophic effects of mesenchymal stem cells increase chondrocyte proliferation and matrix formation. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17(9–10):1425–36. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. de Windt TS, Saris DB, Slaper-Cortenbach IC, van Rijen MH, Gawlitta D, Creemers LB, de Weger RA, Dhert WJ, Vonk LA. Direct cell-cell contact with chondrocytes is a key mechanism in multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell-mediated chondrogenesis. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21(19–20):2536–47. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Li X, Li X, Yang J, Lin J, Zhu Y, Xu X, Cui W. Living and injectable porous hydrogel microsphere with paracrine activity for cartilage regeneration. Small. 2023;19(17):e2207211. doi: 10.1002/smll.202207211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Satué M, Schüler C, Ginner N, Erben RG. Intra-articularly injected mesenchymal stem cells promote cartilage regeneration, but do not permanently engraft in distant organs. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46554-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Shimaya M, Muneta T, Ichinose S, Tsuji K, Sekiya I. Magnesium enhances adherence and cartilage formation of synovial mesenchymal stem cells through integrins. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(10):1300–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yin D, Huang C, Liang C, Zhuang J, Chen H, He Y, Yu H, Xiao J, Huang Y, Zhou J, Chen X. Magnesium regulates the migration and differentiation of NPMSCs via the integrin signaling pathway. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025;20:738–783. doi:10.2174/011574888X304570240705094512. http://www.eurekaselect.com/article/141733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yao H, Xu JK, Zheng NY, Wang JL, Mok SW, Lee YW, Shi L, Wang JY, Yue J, Yung SH, Hu PJ, et al. Intra-articular injection of magnesium chloride attenuates osteoarthritis progression in rats. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27(12):1811–21. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Woo J-H, Lim YS, Cho JS, Yang HJ, Jang JH, Choi JY, Choi WS. Saline versus plasma solution-a in initial resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2023;12(15):5040. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Yea J-H, Park J-K, Kim IJ, Sym G, Bae T-S, Jo CH. Regeneration of a full-thickness defect of rotator cuff tendon with freshly thawed umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a rat model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01906-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Jo CH, Kim OS, Park EY, Kim BJ, Lee JH, Kang SB, Lee JH, Han HS, Rhee SH, Yoon KS. Fetal mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord sustain primitive characteristics during extensive expansion. Cell Tissue Res. 2008;334(3):423–33. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0696-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Jung M, Kaszap B, Redöhl A, Steck E, Breusch S, Richter W, Gotterbarm T. Enhanced early tissue regeneration after matrix-assisted autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in full thickness chondral defects in a minipig model. Cell Transplant. 2009;18(8):923–32. doi: 10.3727/096368909X471297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. van den Borne MP, Raijmakers NJ, Vanlauwe J, Victor J, de Jong SN, Bellemans J, Saris DB, International Cartilage Repair Society. International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) and Oswestry macroscopic cartilage evaluation scores validated for use in Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) and microfracture. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15(12):1397–1402. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. O’Driscoll SW, Keeley FW, Salter RB. Durability of regenerated articular cartilage produced by free autogenous periosteal grafts in major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(4):595–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Li Z, Zheng X, Wang Y, Tao T, Wang Z, Yuan L, Han B. The biomimetics of Mg(2+)-concentration-resolved microenvironment for bone and cartilage repairing materials design. Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;7(4):227. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7040227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Sarsenova M, Mukhambetova A, Saginov B, Raimagambetov Y, Ogay V. Synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells in combination with low molecular weight hyaluronic acid for cartilage repair. Int J Biomed. 2022;12(4):548–53. doi: 10.21103/Article12(4)_OA4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Patel S, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Haddad FS. The use of fibrin glue in surgery of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(10):1325–31. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wang Y, Liu Y, Chen E, Pan Z. The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in mesenchymal stem cell senescence. Cell Tissue Res. 2020;382(3):457–62. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03272-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Li Y, Wu Q, Wang Y, Li L, Bu H, Bao J. Senescence of mesenchymal stem cells (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2017;39(4):775–82. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.2912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Wang J, Liu X, Qiu Y, Shi Y, Cai J, Wang B, Wei X, Ke Q, Sui X, Wang Y, Huang Y, et al. Cell adhesion-mediated mitochondria transfer contributes to mesenchymal stem cell-induced chemoresistance on T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0554-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Islam MN, Das SR, Emin MT, Wei M, Sun L, Westphalen K, Rowlands DJ, Quadri SK, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya J. Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury. Nat Med. 2012;18(5):759–65. doi: 10.1038/nm.2736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Numata H, Nakase J, Oshima T, Tsuchiya H. Effectiveness of adhering adipose-derived stem cells to defective cartilage in promoting cartilage regeneration in a rabbit model. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(9):2619–26. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hocking AM, Gibran NS. Mesenchymal stem cells: paracrine signaling and differentiation during cutaneous wound repair. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(14):2213–19. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Sajjad U, Ahmed M, Iqbal MZ, Riaz M, Mustafa M, Biedermann T, Klar AS. Exploring mesenchymal stem cells homing mechanisms and improvement strategies. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2024;13(12):1161–77. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szae045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Bacon K, LaValley MP, Jafarzadeh SR, Felson D. Does cartilage loss cause pain in osteoarthritis and if so, how much. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(8):1105–10. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Konopka JA, Finlay AK, Eckstein F, Dragoo JL. Effects of unloader bracing on clinical outcomes and articular cartilage regeneration following microfracture of isolated chondral defects: a randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(9):2889–98. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06228-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Nakamura T, Sekiya I, Muneta T, Hatsushika D, Horie M, Tsuji K, Kawarasaki T, Watanabe A, Hishikawa S, Fujimoto Y, Tanaka H, et al. Arthroscopic, histological and MRI analyses of cartilage repair after a minimally invasive method of transplantation of allogeneic synovial mesenchymal stromal cells into cartilage defects in pigs. Cytotherapy. 2012;14(3):327–38. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2011.638912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Ishihara K, Nakayama K, Akieda S, Matsuda S, Iwamoto Y. Simultaneous regeneration of full-thickness cartilage and subchondral bone defects in vivo using a three-dimensional scaffold-free autologous construct derived from high-density bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:98. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0098-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Koga H, Muneta T, Ju YJ, Nagase T, Nimura A, Mochizuki T, Ichinose S, von der Mark K, Sekiya I. Synovial stem cells are regionally specified according to local microenvironments after implantation for cartilage regeneration. Stem Cells. 2007;25(3):689–96. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Zhang Y, Ravikumar M, Ling L, Nurcombe V, Cool SM. Age-related changes in the inflammatory status of human mesenchymal stem cells: implications for cell therapy. Stem Cell Rep. 2021;16(4):694–707. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Szychlinska MA, Stoddart MJ, D’Amora U, Ambrosio L, Alini M, Musumeci G. Mesenchymal stem cell-based cartilage regeneration approach and cell senescence: can we manipulate cell aging and function? Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2017;23(6):529–39. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2017.0083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Beane OS, Fonseca VC, Cooper LL, Koren G, Darling EM. Impact of aging on the regenerative properties of bone marrow-, muscle-, and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e115963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ayerst BI, Day AJ, Nurcombe V, Cool SM, Merry CL. New strategies for cartilage regeneration exploiting selected glycosaminoglycans to enhance cell fate determination. Biochem Soc Trans. 2014;42(3):703–709. doi: 10.1042/BST20140031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Alizadeh Sardroud H, Wanlin T, Chen X, Eames BF. Cartilage tissue engineering approaches need to assess fibrocartilage when hydrogel constructs are mechanically loaded. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:787538. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.787538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Baba R, Onodera T, Matsuoka M, Hontani K, Joutoku Z, Matsubara S, Homan K, Iwasaki N. Bone marrow stimulation technique augmented by an ultrapurified alginate gel enhances cartilage repair in a canine model. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(8):1970–79. doi: 10.1177/0363546518770436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Koga H, Shimaya M, Muneta T, Nimura A, Morito T, Hayashi M, Suzuki S, Ju YJ, Mochizuki T, Sekiya I. Local adherent technique for transplanting mesenchymal stem cells as a potential treatment of cartilage defect. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(4):R84. doi: 10.1186/ar2460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Hagandora CK, Tudares MA, Almarza AJ. The effect of magnesium ion concentration on the fibrocartilage regeneration potential of goat costal chondrocytes. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40(3):688–96. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0433-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Hu T, Xu H, Wang C, Qin H, An Z. Magnesium enhances the chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by inhibiting activated macrophage-induced inflammation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21783-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Chen Z, Zhou T, Yin Z, Duan P, Zhang Y, Feng Y, Shi R, Xu Y, Pang R, Tan H. Promotion of microfracture-mediated cartilage repair by the intra-articular injection of Mg2. Bone Joint Res. 2025;14(1):20–32. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.141.BJR-2024-0017.R2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. de Windt TS, Vonk LA, Slaper-Cortenbach IC, van den Broek MP, Nizak R, van Rijen MH, de Weger RA, Dhert WJ, Saris DB. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells stimulate cartilage regeneration and are safe for single-stage cartilage repair in humans upon mixture with recycled autologous chondrons. Stem Cells. 2017;35(1):256–64. doi: 10.1002/stem.2475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. El Omar R, Beroud J, Stoltz J-F, Menu P, Velot E, Decot V. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: the new gold standard for mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies? Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2014;20(5):523–44. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2013.0664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Xu R, Wu J, Zheng L, Zhao M. Undenatured type II collagen and its role in improving osteoarthritis. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;91:102080. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-docx-1-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 – Supplemental material for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model by Jian Jiang, Min Ji Lee, Daeun Lee, Kwi-Hoon Jang, Tae Woo Kim and Chris Hyunchul Jo in Cell Transplantation

sj-docx-2-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 – Supplemental material for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model by Jian Jiang, Min Ji Lee, Daeun Lee, Kwi-Hoon Jang, Tae Woo Kim and Chris Hyunchul Jo in Cell Transplantation

sj-docx-4-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 – Supplemental material for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model

Supplemental material, sj-docx-4-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model by Jian Jiang, Min Ji Lee, Daeun Lee, Kwi-Hoon Jang, Tae Woo Kim and Chris Hyunchul Jo in Cell Transplantation

sj-tif-3-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 – Supplemental material for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model

Supplemental material, sj-tif-3-cll-10.1177_09636897251411597 for Regeneration of full-thickness cartilage defects using small umbilical cord–derived fast proliferating cells combined with magnesium in a rat model by Jian Jiang, Min Ji Lee, Daeun Lee, Kwi-Hoon Jang, Tae Woo Kim and Chris Hyunchul Jo in Cell Transplantation


Articles from Cell Transplantation are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES