Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2025 Dec 12;16:1590. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-30964-9

Increased plasma fibronectin mirrors intimal phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells in moyamoya arteriopathy

Caroline Asselman 1,2,3,#, Jozefien Meersschaut 1,2,3,#, Patrick Willems 1,2,#, Julien Mortier 4,5,6, Frank Vernaillen 4,5,6, Elisabeth Dhondt 7, Anne Sieben 8,9, Sasha Libbrecht 8, Esperánza Fernandez 1,2, Kris Gevaert 1,2, Ward De Spiegelaere 10,11, Evelien Van Hamme 4,5,6, Veerle De Herdt 12,13, Jo Van Dorpe 14,15, Dimitri Hemelsoet 12,16, Bart Dermaut 2,3,16,✉, Francis Impens 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC12800044  PMID: 41387995

Abstract

Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a rare cerebrovascular disorder characterized by progressive stenosis of large intracranial arteries and formation of fragile collateral vessels that can be triggered by a broad range of genetic and immune factors. Central to MMD pathology is excessive proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in the intima of affected arteries associated with contractile-to-synthetic phenotypic switching, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. To identify dysregulated pathways we studied a cohort of 12 patients with well-documented MMD, including one post-mortem autopsy case, using a multi-omics approach combining whole exome sequencing with plasma proteomics. In addition, we conducted an in-depth spatial proteomics analysis of an occluded artery retrieved post-mortem from one idiopathic patient, combining targeted antibody-based imaging with laser capture microdissection coupled to mass spectrometry. Genetic predispositions for MMD was found in 8 out of 12 patients (67%), including three patients with variants in the major susceptibility gene RNF213 and five with varying underlying genetic conditions (trisomy 21, pathogenic variants in ACTA2, SAMHD1, NFIA). Artery spatial proteomics revealed phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells associated with infiltration of these cells in the intima, including loss of contractile and gain of synthetic marker proteins. Most notably, increased expression of cellular fibronectin in the occluded lesion was associated with increased levels in patients’ plasma, providing a rationale for cellular fibronectin as potential tissue leakage biomarker for moyamoya disease. Finally, infiltration of macrophages and antigen-presenting cells in the intima pointed to a role for inflammatory signals in disease progression. Together, our data provide an unprecedented spatial view on protein changes in an occluded moyamoya artery, revealing intimal infiltration of synthetic vascular smooth muscle cells and antigen-presenting immune cells as key pathological findings, opening novel avenues for future diagnosis and research.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-30964-9.

Keywords: Moyamoya disease, Stroke, Cerebrovascular disorder, FN1, Multiomics

Subject terms: Cardiology, Diseases, Neurology, Neuroscience

Introduction

Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a rare and progressive cerebrovascular disorder characterized by the gradual stenosis and occlusion of intracranial arteries, mainly the distal internal carotid artery and proximal middle and anterior cerebral arteries. Occlusion of these arteries is the result of abnormal infiltration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in the intima in response to yet unknown stimuli1. Typical for MMD is the formation of compensatory collateral fragile vessels, angiographically resembling a "puff of smoke" (“moyamoya” in Japanese)2. Clinically, MMD is often characterized by transient or permanent ischemic events or hemorrhagic stroke3. Symptoms include focal neurological deficits related to reduced or absent blood flow to the brain such as dysarthria, aphasia, hemiparesis, sensory disturbances, visual impairments, involuntary movements, seizures, altered consciousness, and cognitive dysfunction. Additionally, non-specific symptoms like vertigo, dizziness, or headaches may occur due to cerebral hemodynamic compromise or meningeal collateral vessel dilation3. When these vascular changes, also referred to as moyamoya angiopathy (MMA), occur in association with another condition the term moyamoya syndrome (MMS) is frequently used3,4.

The precise etiology of MMD is unknown, however, genetic factors have long been suspected to play a crucial role. In 9–15% of patients, a positive family history of MMD is observed5. In addition, the association of MMD or MMA-like changes with multiple genetically transmitted disorders such as trisomy 21, neurofibromatosis type 1 or pathogenic variants in ACTA2 and SAMHD1, as well as the occurrence of a strong ethnic preference in East Asia suggest an important genetic component4. In 2011, a missense variant within the RNF213 gene known as the p.(R4810K) founder variant was found to dramatically increase MMD risk by over 100-fold in East-Asian populations6,7. While homozygous carriers of this variant have a ~ 80% chance of developing MMD, heterozygous carriers show a much lower disease penetrance, suggesting that beyond genetic predisposition, a second environmental and/or genetic ‘hit’ is needed to trigger MMD onset4. Interestingly, recent molecular studies uncovered RNF213 as a multifunctional protein with a pivotal role in the innate immune response against microbial infections4,8–10. In addition, a growing body of clinical evidence shows that MMD often occurs in conjunction with infection or autoimmune conditions. Together, these molecular and clinical observations suggest a role for immune-related triggers as a second hit in moyamoya pathogenesis in genetically predisposed individuals4.

While the RNF213 p.(R4810K) founder variant largely explains the increased MMD prevalence in East Asia, other RNF213 variants and other genes have also been reported in association with MMD within and outside the East-Asian population. However, genome-wide association studies have yet to pinpoint predominant susceptibility variants in Caucasian MMD11. Since comparatively limited research has been conducted on patients with MMA in Western countries12–15, we clinically and genetically characterized a cohort of 12 patients with MMA followed at the University Hospital in Ghent, Belgium, and profiled their plasma proteome in comparison with healthy individuals. In addition, a detailed histopathological and single-cell spatial proteomics analysis of an occluded artery of one of the patients was performed, providing unprecedented insight into VSMC phenotypic switching and immune cell infiltration in MMD development. Upregulation of cellular fibronectin in the occluded artery correlated with increased plasma levels of cellular fibronectin, which we propose here as a potential biomarker for MMD.

Material and methods

Patient cohort

From 2019 until 2022 we recruited a cohort of 12 affected individuals with MMA at Ghent University Hospital (Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent or UZ Gent). All patients were clinically evaluated, including medical and family history, and diagnostic imaging. Cerebral computed tomographic imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, and conventional digital subtraction angiography were performed in these patients at multiple timepoints. MMD/MMS diagnosis was made according to international guidelines16. Blood samples of these 12 patients were taken for multiomics work-up including whole exome sequencing (WES) and plasma proteomics. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) brain autopsy material was generated from one MMD patient and used for spatial omics analysis of an occluded MMD artery.

Genetic studies

Genetic studies were initiated at the Center for Medical Genetics at UZ Gent and included WES of all patients except patient 11 for whom WES had been performed previously in a research setting18. Molecular diagnoses had already been obtained in four more patients during diagnostic work-up prior to the start of this study using different genetic techniques: patient 2 (conventional karyotyping), patient 3 (molecular karyotyping by array CGH and shallow whole genome sequencing) and patients 4 and 8 (targeted gene analysis). WES was performed on the Illumina Novaseq 6000 Platform after enrichment of gDNA with SureSelectXT Low Input Human All Exon v6 and v7 (Agilent Technologies). The BWA-MEM 0.7.17 algorithm was used for read mapping against the human genome reference sequence (NCBI, GRCh38/hg38), duplicate read removal, and variant calling. Variant calling and filtering were performed using Seqplorer, an in-house developed tool for the analysis of WES data. The position of the called variants was based on NCBI build GRCh38. A minimum of 90% of the interrogated genes had a coverage of > 20x. Nucleotide numbering was according to the Human Genome Variation Society guidelines (HGVS). Variant filtering criteria in Seqplorer included a population frequency (gnomAD) < 0.02, impact on the protein predicted to be moderate or high, minimal variant quality of 20, and minimal depth of 2 reads. Low-impact variants such as synonymous variants or intronic splice region variants > 8 nucleotides away from the splice junction were not prioritized using standard settings. Potential copy number variants (CNVs) were called using ExomeDepth, an algorithm which uses WES data to detect read depth differences in coding regions17.

Analysis of candidate genes was performed in all patients in two ways: (1) the application of a small Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)-based candidate gene list of 18 genes previously reported in MMD/MMS-related monogenic disorders (Table 1) and (2) a complete Mendeliome analysis (4878 OMIM genes). Variant classification was performed using an in-house developed tool based on the ACMG and ACGS guidelines18 in the following classes: (1) benign, (2) likely benign (> 95% certainty that the variant is benign), (3) variant of unknown significance, (4) likely pathogenic (> 95% certainty that the variant is pathogenic), and (5) pathogenic18.

Table 1.

Diagnostic OMIM candidate gene list for moyamoya disease/moyamoya syndrome.

Gene OMIM* gene ID OMIM* phenotypes, inheritance and identifier
RNF213 613768 Moyamoya disease 2, susceptibility to, 607151
ACTA2 102620 Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 6, 611788, autosomal dominant; Moyamoya disease 5, 614042; Smooth muscle dysfunction syndrome, 613834, autosomal dominant
GUCY1A3 139396 Moyamoya 6 with achalasia, 615750, Autosomal recessive
ANO1 610108 Intestinal dysmotility syndrome, 620045, autosomal recessive ; Moyamoya disease 7, 620687, autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive
SAMHD1 606754 Chilblain lupus 2, 614415, autosomal dominant ; Aicardi-Goutières syndrome 5, 612952, autosomal recessive
NF1 613113 Leukemia, juvenile myelomonocytic, 607785, autosomal dominant, somatic mutation ; Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome, 601321, autosomal dominant ; Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal, 162210, autosomal dominant ; Neurofibromatosis, type 1, 162200, autosomal dominant ; Watson syndrome, 193520, autosomal dominant
CBL 165360 Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, 607785, autosomal dominant, somatic mutation; Noonan syndrome-like disorder with or without juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, 613563, autosomal dominant
JAG1 601920 Deafness, congenital heart defects, and posterior embryotoxon, 617992, autosomal dominant; Alagille syndrome 1, 118450, autosomal dominant; Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, axonal, type 2HH, 619574, autosomal dominant; Tetralogy of Fallot, 187500, autosomal dominant
YY1AP1 607860 Grange syndrome, 602531, autosomal recessive
SMARCAL1 606622 Schimke immunoosseous dysplasia, 242900, autosomal recessive
CHD4 603277 Sifrim-Hitz-Weiss syndrome, 617159, autosomal dominant
CNOT3 604910 Intellectual developmental disorder with speech delay, autism, and dysmorphic facies, 618672, autosomal dominant
SETD5 615743 Intellectual developmental disorder, autosomal dominant 23, 615761, autosomal dominant
MYH11 160745 Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 4, 132900, autosomal dominant; Megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome, 619351, autosomal recessive; Visceral myopathy 2, 619350, autosomal dominant
PCNT 605925 Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism, type II, 210720, autosomal recessive
DIAPH1 602121 Deafness, autosomal dominant 1, with or without thrombocytopenia, 124900, autosomal dominant; Seizures, cortical blindness, microcephaly syndrome, 616632, autosomal recessive
BRCC3, MTCP1 300617, 300116 Contiguous gene syndrome: Moyamoya disease 4, 300845, X-linked recessive

*Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man.

Brain sample immunohistochemistry and laser capture microdissection

Processing and preservation of brain sample

Tissue samples from the autopsy case were provided by the Pathology Department of UZ Gent. The brain autopsy was performed according to the standardized protocols of UZ Gent. Dissection of the major cerebral arteries and the circle of Willis at the base of the brain was performed on fresh brain tissue. Next, the arteries were fixed in neutral-buffered 4% formaldehyde and subsequently processed for paraffin embedding using an automatic tissue processor (Microm STP 420D, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA).

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin blocks of transverse sections of the large brain arteries and circle of Willis were sectioned into 4 μm thick histological sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Immunohistochemical (IHC) stainings for smooth muscle actin, calponin, H-caldesmon, desmin, CD45, CD3, CD8, CD20, CD4, CD68, ERG and CD31 were performed in routine fashion using a Ventana immunostainer (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).

Laser capture microdissection

Paraffin-embedded tissues were cut into 8 μm thick sections and mounted on PEN membrane slides (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The slides were left in an incubator at 56 °C overnight for optimal adherence of the tissue to the membrane. Slides were dewaxed, rehydrated, and then stained in hematoxylin (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) for 10 s, followed by rinsing in water (10 s) and Scott’s tap water solution (10 s) (Sigma-Aldrich, Diegem, Belgium). Subsequently, the tissue slides were stained with eosin Y (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) for 5 s and dehydrated in graded ethanol concentrations, starting with two baths of 95% for 10 s followed by two baths of isopropanol for 30 s. Finally, the sections were completely dehydrated by immersing the slides in two successive baths of xylene for 60 s each. The slides were air-dried in a laminar flow cabinet and individually placed in sterile 50 ml falcon tubes to prevent rehydration by air. A PALM Microbeam II (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used for laser microdissection. Intimal and medial tissue was microdissected and collected in 200 µl adhesive caps.

Spatial proteomics

For plasma proteomics and laser capture microdissection proteomics analysis methods please see Supplementary Material 1.

Sample preparation and data acquisition

Spatial proteomics analysis was performed using the MACSima™ Imaging System, a fully automated instrument that combines widefield microscopy and liquid handling for cyclic immunofluorescence imaging. Staining cycles consisted of the following automated steps: immunofluorescent staining, sample washing, multi-field imaging, and signal erasure (photobleaching or REAlease). FFPE brain tissue was sectioned on slides and a MACSWell™ imaging frame was mounted immediately on the slide. Ice-cold 4% PFA solution was added according to the MACSWell™ imaging frame datasheet and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The slide was washed three times with MACSima Running Buffer. After washing, the initial sample volume of MACSima Running Buffer was added according to the MACSWell™ imaging frames datasheet. Right before the start of the MACSima™ instrument a DAPI pre-staining was performed. To this end, the MACSima Running Buffer was removed from the sample to be analyzed and stained for 10 min with a 1:10 dilution of a DAPI staining solution. The DAPI staining solution was removed and three washing steps were performed with MACSima Running Buffer. Finally, the initial sample volume of MACSima Running Buffer was added. We used the REAscreen MAX kit, human, FFPE, version 02 (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), in addition to six antibodies against human ISG15, RNF213, MMP2, FN1, IFN-γ and ACTA2 (Supplementary Table 1).

Image analysis

The raw data outputted by the MACSima™ device was preprocessed using the accompanying software suite, MACS IQ View Analysis. Among other imaging corrections (e.g. flatfield correction), this preprocessing step performs stitching and registration based on the DAPI-images in each imaging cycle. Moreover, for each cycle background correction was performed on the biomarker signal images by subtracting the images acquired after signal erasure of the previous cycle. Of the initial 146 markers from the REAscreen MAX panel, 15 (Cytokeratin, CytokeratinHMW, BATF, TIM3, MastCellTryptase, CD209, MelanocytePMEL, CLA, Dnmt3b, PKCalpha, Cytokeratin14, CD66, CD202b, CD100 and CD134) were removed due to clear quality issues. Using custom Python scripts, the resulting TIFF images of the imaged region of interest (ROI) were cropped to focus on a high-quality ROI devoid of major acquisition artifacts (i.e. focusing issues, tissue folds, etc.) and for some channels, the automatic registration from the MACS IQ View was manually corrected by including an extra 15-pixel shift. For the first three cycles (containing the six custom antibodies), a larger correction in registration was needed, which was achieved by placing manual landmarks on the DAPI-image of cycle 1 and the DAPI image of cycle four and transforming the images of the first three cycles using a thin-plate spline transformation in the BigWarp plugin in FIJI (ImageJ v.1.54f)19. Next, tissue regions (lumen, intima, etc.) and artifacts still present in the cropped ROI (out-of-focus, tissue folds and acquisition bleaching) were manually annotated in QuPath (v.0.4.4)20 to remove any cells detected in these regions. Using the python package SPArrOW as an analysis framework, nucleus segmentation was performed by Cellpose21 on the DAPI-channel. Cellpose was also used to estimate a whole-cell segmentation for immune cells based on a combination of immune markers (CD15, CD43, CD45, CD45RA, CD45RB, CD57, CD66b, CD162, HLADR and Syk) that had good signal-to-noise and for which the cell outlines could be detected. Whole-cell segmentation for red blood cells was based on the CD233 marker. For all other cells, the cell outline was approximated by expanding the nucleus segmentation by 10 pixels. Using these cell segmentations, object classifiers were trained for marker positivity using ilastik (v.1.4.0.post1)22 for CD2, CD8a, CD15, CD43, CD45, CD45RA, CD45RB, CD57, CD66b, CD162, HLADR and Syk based on the intensity features of the corresponding marker image.

Single cell analysis

Average intensities per cell for all channels were used to generate a 10X-like input containing 138 features (antibody channels) for 3936 cells to enable single cell analysis with Seurat (v.4.3.0.1)23. A Seurat object was generated using the Read10X function and cell metadata from the spatial proteomics image analysis was added, including the manually annotated tissue region (e.g. intima or tunica media), the presence of technical artefacts and others. Cells presenting outlier intensity values, acquisition bleaching or residing in out-of-focus or tissue folding areas were removed. For data normalization, we performed centered log ratio (CLR) transformation within cells (NormalizeData function, method ‘CLR’, margin 2). Afterwards, we detected highly variable genes (FindVariableGenes function), scaled data (ScaleData function) and performed principal component analysis (runPCA function) using 12 principal components. Subsequently, unsupervised clustering was performed using the FindNeighbours and FindClusters functions (clustering resolution of 0.2) and visualized by uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) using the RunUMAP function. This reveals five clusters corresponding to distinct cell tissues (intima, adventitia, media, endothelium and lumen). Protein markers for each cluster were identified with the FindMarkers function using the ‘roc’ test (upregulated markers only), where we retained the top five ranked proteins with the highest predictive power for each cluster. This procedure was repeated for the subset of 223 immune cells identified by the whole-cell segmentation based on a combination of immune markers described above.

Statistical analysis

Differential protein analysis for plasma (n = 11) and laser capture microdissection (LCM) proteomics (n = 3) was performed using MSqRob2 (v.1.6.1)24. After aggregation of normalized peptide intensities to protein intensities, a robust linear model was fitted and moderated t-tests were performed (for details see Supplementary Material 1). Single cell clustering and marker analysis used built-in functions of the Seurat package23.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data of the laser capture microdissection (LCM) and plasma proteomics have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository25 with the dataset identifiers PXD057183 and PXD063236, respectively.

Results

Patient cohort: clinical and genetic characteristics

The study cohort consisted of twelve patients diagnosed with MMD or MMS, including ten unrelated sporadic cases and two related patients. A summary of the clinical and genetic characteristics of all patients is shown in Table 2 and relevant clinical patient information is provided as Supplementary Material 1. Blood samples were obtained from all twelve patients. The brain of one patient was obtained for further investigation. Nine patients showed bilateral MMD versus unilateral MMD in three patients. All patients had experienced at least one ischemic (nine patients) or hemorrhagic stroke (three patients). Three patients received neurosurgical treatment with revascularization. The most common symptoms reported were migraine without aura (three patients), arterial hypertension (four patients), and recurring viral infections of the upper airway (five patients). Interestingly, five out of twelve patients were diagnosed with other conditions in addition to MMD, such as Down syndrome, Crohn’s disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, and cancer (osteosarcoma in the jaw).

Table 2.

Clinical and genetic characteristics of all patients. For more information see the patient vignettes included in the Supplementary Material 1.

Age range (years) Medical history Clinical presentation Infection/inflammation MMA uni- or bilateral/collaterals Genetic diagnosis ClinVar†/gnomAD‡/
DGV‡
Frequency
1 31–35 No major problems Collaps with stupor and right hemiparesis Aspiration pneumonia & cutaneous herpes simplex in acute phase Bilateral/yes

RNF213

c.14429G > A

p.R4810K,6 class 5

Conflicting/0.000295
2 26–30 Trisomy 21 Ischemic stroke with left hemiparesis Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection Unilateral/yes Trisomy 2160 –
3 31–35 Macrocephaly, mild cognitive impairment, pes planus Ischemic stroke and partial status epilepticus Tonsillectomy Bilateral/yes NFIA intragenic deletion (exon 3–6)63 –/Not found
4 26–30 Persistent open ductus arteriosus with closure Neurological evaluation because of delayed motor development; brain-MRI: periventricular leuko-encephalopathy. Cardiac echo: mild dilatation aorta ascendens Protracted bronchitis during childhood followed by ataxia, problems with fine motor skills, dysarthria, and involuntary movements with tentative diagnosis of relapsing–remitting Sydenham’s chorea Bilateral/yes

ACTA2

c.536G > A

p.R179H,27 class 5

Pathogenic/Not found
5 41–45 Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease) Ischemic stroke Folliculitis, Clostridium difficile enteritis Bilateral/yes
6 61–65 Headache/migraine since adolescence. Myoma uteri with hysterectomy; arterial hypertension, resection benign lip angioma Ischemic stroke with hemiparesis and recurrent TIA No Bilateral/yes

RNF213

g.80364462C > T

p.A3927V26

–/Not found
7 81–85 Inflammatory arthropathy, spinocellular carcinoma oral cavity, coiling MCA aneurysm MCA aneurysm No Unilateral / yes

RNF213

g.80364462C > T

p.A3927V26

–/Not found
8 26–30 Surgery for patent ductus arteriosus with cardiac decompensation at young age, complicated with RSV bronchiolitis; mydriasis Fatigue, sensory changes, mydriasis RSV bronchiolitis at young age Bilateral/yes

ACTA2

c.535C > A

p.R179S,27 class 5

Pathogenic/Not found
9 31–35 Migraine without aura since childhood Intracerebral haemorrhage No Bilateral/yes
10 56–60 Rheumatoid arthritis, migraine Recurrent ischemic stroke Chronic sinusitis, acute cholecystitis Bilateral/yes
11 36–40 Recurrent mitral valve chorda rupture, type I interferonopathy, short stature Migraine, pain in the legs during childhood, TIA Type I interferonopathy Bilateral/yes

SAMHD1

c.676C > 7 p.R226C,28 class 3

 + 

c.1608 + 2 T > C

(Splice site mutation),28 class 4

Uncertain significance/0.0000132

Likely pathogenic/Not found

12 21–25 RSV bronchiolitis and synovitis hip at young age Ischemic stroke at young age RSV bronchiolitis, synovitis Bilateral/yes

MCA, middle cerebral artery; RSV, Respiratory Syncytial Virus; TIA, transient ischemic attack. †Clinical variant database. ‡Genome aggregation database. ‡Database of genomic variants.

RNF213 variants were found in three MMD patients, including patient 1 carrying the East-Asian founder variant p.(R4810K)6,7 and patients 6 and 7 carrying a novel rare variant p.(A3927V) of RNF213. Similar to p.(R4810K), this mutation is located in the E3 module of RNF21326. In addition, five MMS patients had underlying genetic conditions with known moyamoya associations including trisomy 21 (patient 2) as well as monogenic disorders caused by heterozygous de novo pathogenic variants in ACTA2 (patients 4 and 8)27, compound heterozygous variants in SAMHD1 (patient 11, previously reported)28 and a familial heterozygous intragenic deletion in NFIA (patient 3). Genetic analysis revealed no known MMD/MMS-related variants in patients 5, 9, 10, and 12.

Identification of FN1 as a potential biomarker for moyamoya disease

Having established a genetic diagnosis for the majority of our moyamoya patients, we profiled their plasma proteome by untargeted LC–MS/MS analysis to look for immune-related signatures in line with the hypothesis that MMD might be triggered by aberrant immune responses in genetically predisposed individuals4. In addition, quantitative comparison with plasma of sex- and age-matched healthy controls could reveal potential protein biomarkers associated with MMD. Principal component analysis showed coherent clustering of patient and control samples (Fig. 1A) and further statistical analysis revealed significantly regulated proteins between both groups (Fig. 1B). The control group was characterized by consistently higher levels of platelet marker proteins (Fig. 1B–C, Supplementary Fig. 1). These are common contaminations in plasma proteomics data resulting from platelet activation during blood collection29. The absence of these proteins in the MMD group likely results from antiplatelet therapy to which moyamoya patients are subjected as standard of care30. Conversely, we detected six proteins that were significantly upregulated in the moyamoya patient population (Fig. 1B), related to blood hemostasis (VWF)31, immunity (CRP, C4A)32,33, and cell proliferation (OIT3, FBLN5 and FN1)34–36. While upregulation of CRP corroborated earlier observations37,38 in line with a state of low-grade inflammation in MMD39,40, upregulation of FN1 seemed promising in terms of biomarker potential. Of this protein, two distinct isoforms—plasma Fibronectin (pFN1) and cellular Fibronectin (cFN1)—are described41. In contrast to pFN1, cFN1 contains two additional protein domains: extra domain A (EDA) and extra domain B (EDB) (Fig. 1D). pFN1 is produced and secreted by hepatocytes and is abundantly present in plasma, while cFN1 is produced by a broad variety of cell types acting as an extracellular matrix (ECM) protein, with a markedly lower plasma concentration. Interestingly, along with other FN1 peptides, we found an EDA-specific peptide upregulated in moyamoya patients’ plasma (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Plasma proteomics profiling reveals cFN1 as potential moyamoya disease biomarker. (A) Principal component analysis of healthy control (blue, HC) and moyamoya disease (red, MMD) plasma proteomics samples. (B) Volcano plot showing the differential protein abundance of MMD samples and healthy control plasma proteomics samples. Significant upregulated and downregulated proteins were indicated in red and blue, respectively. Platelet quality marker proteins defined by Geyer et al.29 are indicated in dark blue. (C) Platelet contaminant index for each individual sample according to the method described by Geyer et al.29. (D) (Top) Schematic representation of the domain structure of plasma and cellular fibronectin. Regions with FN module type I, II, and III are indicated by blue, green and yellow rectangles, respectively, while the variable region in purple. (Bottom) Box plots showing the log2 peptide intensity in MMD patients and healthy controls (HCs) of all detected FN1 peptides (Left) and the GLAFTDVDVDSIK peptide specific to the FN1-EDA domain (Right). *P < 0.05, Welch t-test, HC (n = 6) vs. MMD (n = 8).

Spatial single cell proteomics analysis of an occluded moyamoya artery

To gain more insight into the disease mechanisms underlying MMD we took advantage of unique brain autopsy material that was collected from patient 5. We used the MACSima™ imaging system to image a cross section of an occluded MMD artery at single cell resolution (Fig. 2A). This targeted proteomics approach allowed to stain with a commercial panel of 146 antibodies validated for FFPE tissue (see Methods), including several tumor and immune markers that fit well with MMD as an immune-related proliferative disease4. In addition, we added six custom antibodies based on previous MMD research (ISG15, RNF213, IFN-γ, ACTA2, MMP2)1,4,9,42 and our plasma proteomics findings (FN1), generating unprecedented spatial protein expression data of the thickened intima and surrounding tissue layers (Fig. 2B). After cell segmentation and data quality filtering in a region of interest spanning the entire vessel, we obtained expression levels of 138 proteins across 2362 cells.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Spatial single cell proteomics analysis of an occluded moyamoya disease artery. (A) The MACSima™ Imaging System consists of a liquid handling robot and widefield microscope and operates by iterative immunofluorescent staining, sample washing, multi-field imaging, and signal erasure, using three fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies per cycle. Standard and novel image processing algorithms were employed to remove imaging artifacts and to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio. Further in-depth analysis allowed to segment the tissue images into single cells and cluster cells according to their expression profiles. Figure created with BioRender.com. (B) Representative image showing staining for DAPI (purple) and five different antibodies recognizing RNF213 (red), ACTA2 (yellow), MMP2 (green), FN1 (light blue), ISG15 (pink).

Single cell analysis using Seurat23 revealed five cell clusters with similar protein expression profiles. Mapping these cells back onto the sample image enabled us to explore the spatial distribution of these cell populations and differentiate between five broad cell types of the vessel: a collagen-rich outer layer consisting of connective tissue, collagen fibers and elastic fibers (adventitia), a middle layer made up of smooth muscle cells and elastic fibers (media) and an innermost layer which in a healthy artery consists of a thin layer of connective tissue (intima) and endothelial cells (endothelium) outlining the lumen (lumen) (Fig. 3A). In the MMD vessel, extreme thickening of the intima is clearly visible, almost completely obliterating the lumen. Nevertheless, the vessel appears to have been partially functional, as evidenced by red blood cells present in the residual lumen.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Phenotypic switching of intimal VSMCs. (A) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) analysis using Seurat23 for 2362 high-quality cells with 138 features (antibody channels) revealed five cell clusters with similar protein expression profiles corresponding to the different tissue layers of the obliterated artery: (0) intima, (1) lumen, (2) adventitia, (3) media and (4) endothelium. (B–D) Normalized protein expression of DES (Desmin), ACTA2 (smooth muscle actin) and FN1 (Fibronectin1) shown in violin plots per cluster and per cell. (E) Hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry validation staining for CD31, Desmin, smooth muscle actin, Calponin and H-Caldesmon. Scale bar, 200 μm.

The observed thickening of the intima is a key pathological hallmark of MMD resulting from abnormal infiltration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in the intima16. When comparing cell expression profiles in the intima and the media, we observed that intima VSMCs were relatively depleted in smooth muscle markers such as ACTA2 (smooth muscle actin) and especially DES (Desmin), while markers such as FN1 (fibronectin), KRT19 (cytokeratin 19), and GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein) showed high expression (Fig. 3B–D and Supplementary Figs. 2–5). This change in protein expression is in line with VSMC switching from a contractile to synthetic phenotype in the media and intima, respectively, as reported before1. Validation by immunohistochemistry (IHC) confirmed the strong downregulation of DES expression in the intima, while cells in both layers stained positive for smooth muscle markers ACTA2, CNN1 (calponin-1), and CALD1 (caldesmon) (Fig. 3E, Supplementary Fig. 6).

Although MMD is not considered an inflammatory disease, a previous study reported infiltration of macrophages and T lymphocytes in the affected vessel wall1. In line with immune triggers as potential second hit for MMD, we also assessed the presence of immune cells in our dataset using various immune cell markers present in our antibody panel. In total, we distinguished 223 immune cells that mainly resided in the intima, adventitia and lumen, and that clustered into four groups based on their protein expression (Fig. 4A). The majority of these immune cells (161 out of 223) resided in the adventitia and divided across two clusters. The adventitia-II cluster showed relatively high expression of T lymphocyte-associated markers CD8a, CD43, CD45RO and CD45RB (Fig. 4B, Supplementary Fig. 7), while cells in the adventitia-I cluster were characterized by expression of CD204, a myeloid cell marker often associated with tissue-resident M2 macrophages (Fig. 4C)43. In contrast, immune cells infiltrating the intima showed elevated expression of HLA-DR-C and CD162 (Fig. 4D), markers for activated antigen presenting cells (APCs), including pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages44. The third cluster comprised circulating immune cells detected in the residual lumen of the vessel that were characterized by expression of the granulocyte markers CD66 and CD15 (Fig. 4E). IHC using additional lymphoid cell markers (CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD20) confirmed the presence of lymphoid cell populations, such as T- and B-lymphocytes, in the outer adventitia layer (Fig. 4F, Supplementary Fig. 6), while CD68-positive macrophages were found both in the adventitia as well as in the intima where they were scattered between the VSMCs (Fig. 4F). Together, these data point to infiltration of macrophages, likely in a pro-inflammatory state, in the proliferating intima, while lymphoid cells remain in the adventitia.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Immune cell infiltration in the occluded artery. (A) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) analysis using Seurat23 on a subset of 223 segmented immune cells revealed four clusters of cells present in the adventitia (cluster 0 and 1 or adventitia-I and -II, respectively), intima (cluster 2) and the lumen (cluster 3). (B–E) Normalized protein expression of CD8a, CD43, CD204, HLA-DR and CD162 and CD66acde is shown in violin plots per cluster and per cell. (F) Immunohistochemistry validation staining for CD3, CD20 and CD68. Scale bar, 200 μm.

Laser capture microdissection proteomics of a moyamoya disease artery

In addition to targeted imaging-based spatial proteomics, we also employed untargeted mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics to compare protein expression levels in the intima and media layer of the occluded MMD artery. To this end, we used laser capture microdissection to cut out pieces of tissue from the intima and media, followed by low-input quantitative LC–MS/MS analysis (Fig. 5A–B). Dimensionality reduction clearly separated intima and media samples (Fig. 5C) and differential analysis revealed four proteins (DES, DCN, HSPB6, SELENBP1) that were significantly downregulated in the intima compared to the media, while five proteins (TAGLN2, TTR, TSP1, FN1, POSTN) were significantly upregulated (Fig. 5D–E). Downregulation of DES corroborated the spatial proteomics and IHC results and together with HSPB6 indicates the loss of smooth muscle cell-specific protein expression1,45. Along with upregulation of TAGLN2 (transgelin-2), an early smooth muscle marker, and upregulation of the ECM proteins such as FN1, POSTN (periostin) and TSP1 (thrombospondin-1), this change in protein expression pattern indicates a dedifferentiation process, in line with phenotypic switching from a contractile to a proliferative and synthetic phenotype of the VSMCs in the intima. Interestingly, the cFN1-EDA specific peptide GLAFTDVDVDSIK that was found upregulated in MMD patient plasma (Fig. 1D), was also higher abundant in the intimal layer together with another EDA-specific peptide (Supplementary Fig. 8).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

MS-based proteomics indicated phenotypic switching of intimal VSMCs. (A) A fixed and paraffin-embedded sample of an occluded MMD brain artery was mounted on a glass slide for microscopy. Regions inside the intima (I-1, I-2 and I-3) and media (M-1, M-2 and M-3) of the obliterated vessel were selected and cut out by laser capture microdissection (LCM). Samples were then analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). (B) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) image indicating the regions selected for LCM and LC–MS/MS analysis. (C) Multidimensional scaling plot of all quantified proteins with percentages of explained data variance shown on the x and y axis. (D) Volcano plot showing nine proteins with significantly different expression levels between intima and media regions (P ≤ 0.01 and absolute log2 fold change > 1). (E) Heatmap visualizing the normalized intensities of the nine significant proteins in each sample after hierarchical clustering. A single missing intensity value is indicated in grey.

Discussion

MMD is a chronic cerebrovascular occlusive disease, accompanied by an abnormal formation of collateral vessels of the vasculature at the base of the brain16. The complex pathogenesis calls for a multiomics approach to elucidate the yet unknown etiology of MMD, integrating genetic information on MMD susceptibility with mRNA- or protein-level information on potential dysregulated pathways and molecular triggers of the disease, in line with a previously suggested two-hit hypothesis4,46–48. Multiomics research on MMD is however limited, so far focusing on analyses of plasma or CSF of MMD patients49–52. Here, we report the genetic results of a moyamoya patient cohort in combination with plasma proteomics and a spatial proteomics analysis of an occluded artery of one of the patients.

RNF213 is a known MMD susceptibility gene with multiple functions6,7,46, including a recently discovered antimicrobial role8–10. In East-Asian cohorts, MMD is mainly caused by the RNF213 variant p.(R4810K), which increases MMD risk by over 100-fold (reviewed in Mertens et al.11) although disease penetrance is still very low with only 0.5% of carriers of heterozygous p.(R4810K) developing MMD11. Our cohort depicted a more heterogeneous genetic architecture. Three patients carried a single nucleotide variant in RNF213, with one patient being a carrier of the founder variant p.(R4810K), while two patients were related and shared the novel rare variant p.(A3927V). A different substitution p.(A3927T) was identified before in a patient from Caucasian descent26, and is located in the E3 module of RNF213, similar to many other MMD variants4. Therefore, this new variant is potentially the genetic hit in these patients although further segregation and functional studies would be needed.

Two patients with moyamoya-like angiopathy who also showed aorta dilatation, patent ductus arteriosus and congenital bilateral mydriasis (Supplementary Material 1) each carried a de novo pathogenic variant in ACTA2, the gene encoding alpha-smooth muscle actin. Pathogenic ACTA2 variants have been reported to cause smooth muscle cell dysfunction and vascular disorders27,53–56. Interestingly, the specific p.(R179S) and p.(R179H) variants found here have been described in multiple Caucasian MMD patients27,53,56. Another patient in the cohort has been reported previously28 and was compound heterozygous for two variants in SAMHD1, a deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) triphosphohydrolase that can restrict HIV replication in certain immune cells57,58. Pathogenic variants in SAMHD1 can lead to Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS), a rare neuroinflammatory disorder, and can also underlie MMD28. These mutations disrupt SAMHD1 regulation of dNTP, triggering chronic type I interferon (IFN) responses that damage endothelial cells and promote vasculopathy28,57–59, likely contributing to MMA. Infants carrying pathogenic SAMHD1 variants presenting with both AGS and MMS have been described28,57,59, however, the SAMHD1 patient in our cohort does not exhibit AGS despite elevated IFN-signaling gene expression28.

Next to pathogenic variants in single genes, MMD is frequently associated with other syndromes or systemic disorders such as Down syndrome (trisomy 21), sickle cell anemia and neurofibromatosis type-160–62. Our cohort includes one MMA patient with trisomy 21, and patient 3 carried a small intragenic deletion in NFIA. NFIA haploinsufficiency leads to NFIA-related disorder, an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental condition63. Interestingly, MMA has been described in patients with 1p32p31 chromosome deletions encompassing NFIA64,65, suggesting that loss of one NFIA copy may predispose to MMA. Together, whole exome sequencing allowed to identify genetic susceptibility factors for most patients, illustrating the broad range of possible genetic triggers in MMA/MMD development.

In plasma samples from eleven patients, six proteins were found significantly upregulated compared to plasma of sex- and age-matched controls. Two of these proteins, CRP and C4A, are known to be elevated during an inflammatory state66,67. These findings are in line with previous observations and a state of low-grade inflammation that is emerging from recent studies37–40, supporting the idea of an important immunological component in the development of MMD4. Another group of upregulated proteins, OIT3, FBLN5 and FN1, are linked to cancer biology and uncontrolled cell growth34–36. This fits with the proliferation of VSMCs and deposition of ECM in affected moyamoya arteries, especially since our spatial analysis also demonstrated FN1 upregulation in the intima. FN1 has two major isoforms, cFN1 and pFN1, which differ by the EDA and EDB domains specific for cFN134. Under normal conditions, cFN1 is locally excreted into surrounding tissues with no or minimal entry into the bloodstream, while pFN1 is the predominant isoform in plasma68. Interestingly, detection of an EDA-specific peptide in moyamoya plasma suggests that the overall increase in circulating FN1 results at least partially from tissue leakage of cFN1. While cFN1 and its EDA/EDB domains have been explored as biomarkers for pneumological, vascular and especially oncological diseases34,68–72, we here propose to extend their use as potential biomarker for MMD. A biomarker for MMD could facilitate early diagnosis of patients, especially in populations at risk, and help with prognosis and treatment monitoring73–75. Among other proteins, previous studies proposed matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as biomarkers42,76,77, likely resulting from chronic ischemia in the brain, with these markers decreasing after successful revascularization. Another proteomics study suggested FLNA and ZYX proteins as potential serum biomarkers, whose upregulation may enhance fibrin–actin remodeling and contribute to intimal thickening52. Interestingly, we identified FN1 upregulation in moyamoya plasma and in the intimal layer of an occluded artery, which together with elevated levels of a cFN1-specific peptide, suggests that cFN1 might leak into the bloodstream near occlusive lesions. In this way, rather than informing on the ischemic state, cFN1 might act as a marker of artery tissue proliferation and correlate with the level of stenosis. This needs to be confirmed in further studies along with a validation cFN1 as a biomarker on larger patient cohorts using orthogonal methods for protein read-out.

In autopsy-derived material of patient 5 we used a targeted antibody-based spatial proteomics imaging approach and observed extensive infiltration and proliferation of cells in the intima layer of the moyamoya artery. In line with their reported origin as VMSCs1,78, these cells stained positive for the smooth muscle marker ACTA2, Calponin and H-caldesmon, but showed a strong downregulation of desmin expression, which was also confirmed by IHC. Change in the expression of these marker proteins was reported before, as the result of phenotypic switching of these intima VSMCs from a contractile to a synthetic phenotype1. Phenotypic switching of cells is a key mechanism in many vascular diseases79. It describes the ability of cells, particularly VSMCs, to shift between different functional states in response to environmental stimuli or stress in the vascular environment, including vessel injury. This adaptability allows VSMCs to transition from a contractile phenotype which maintains vessel tone, to a synthetic phenotype promoting cellular growth, migration, and matrix production79.

A signature of increased ECM production was also apparent from an untargeted MS-based proteomics analysis, where we detected significant upregulation of ECM proteins FN1, TSP1 and POSTN in the intima compared to medial tissue. Interestingly, expression of FN1 by ACTA2-positive fibroblast-like VSMCs, first discovered in human and mouse atherosclerotic lesions80, provides evidence for phenotypic switching of ingrowing VSMCs to this specific subtype of fibroblast-like VSMCs. Similarly, TSP-1 and POSTN promote intimal hyperplasia and ECM deposition characteristic for occluded moyamoya arteries81–84. Next to ECM proteins, TAGLN2 (Transgelin-2) was found upregulated in intimal cells. TAGLN2 is an actin-binding protein constitutively expressed in immune cells, and is responsive to inflammatory signals such as LPS in APCs, indicating a role in activated macrophages and immune protection85,86. TAGLN2 upregulation potentially reflects the inflammatory environment in MMD and hints again at dedifferentiation of intimal VSMCs.

The single cell resolution of our spatial data also allowed to detect immune cells infiltrating the occluded artery. In contrast to a previous study that reported the presence of both macrophages and T cells in the intima1, we only observed macrophages in this layer, while T and B cells were detected in the adventitia, where residing lymphocytes are expected87. This differential recruitment of immune cells warrants further investigation, especially in light of the emerging role of immune and infectious stimuli as potential triggers for MMD4. In this regard, a recent single cell RNA-Seq study showed infiltration of CD56-positive natural killer T (NKT) cells in the superficial temporal artery (STA) of MMD patients, proposed to influence EC and VSMC proliferation88. Although CD56 was not present in our MACSima panel, some cells in the adventitia stained positive for the mature NKT marker CD57. Unlike atherosclerosis, where both macrophages and T cells are commonly found in atherosclerotic plaques89–91, moyamoya is not considered an inflammatory disease. However, the intimal infiltration of CD68-positive macrophages observed here by IHC suggests that low level inflammation cannot be excluded, especially since single cell imaging revealed a similar pattern of activated APCs in the intima. Due to lack of a CD68 antibody in the used MACSima panel we cannot exclude infiltration of other APCs next to macrophages, but in either case the pro-inflammatory (HLA-DR positive) state of these cells is in line with heightened inflammation markers recently found in peripheral blood of MMD patients39,40. While the precise origin and function of these infiltrating APCs remains unclear, they could disturb the normal crosstalk between endothelial cells and VSMCs for instance via nitric oxide47, thereby promoting VSMC phenotypic switching. Of note, in addition to being a marker of phenotypic switching of VSMCs, FN1, a protein that is upregulated in the intimal layer of the artery in our data, can be induced in an inflammatory environment. FN1 can interact with immune cells, including macrophages and fibroblasts, to promote the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the vessel wall92, further supporting its potential as a disease-related biomarker.

A main limitation of our study is the relatively small cohort size of 12 patients, with spatial proteomics conducted on an autopsy specimen of one of these patients. This reflects the extreme rarity of MMA in non-Asian populations11 and ideally our cohort can be extended in the future to strengthen biological conclusions. Another limitation is that the single cell proteomics analysis was restricted to 152 proteins accessible through antibody staining, though this was complemented by untargeted MS-based proteomics profiling as well as immunohistochemistry. A general obstacle in MMD research is the difficulty of collecting relevant samples and the lack of an experimental animal model93. Here, spatial proteomics was conducted on a single occluded MMD brain artery without non-affected control, while in a recent single cell RNA-seq study, which lacks spatial information, the STA of two MMD patients was compared to the STA of three healthy controls88. Interestingly, this study reported an important role for NKT cells in promoting EC and VSMC proliferation, validated through co-culture experiments. Despite the lack of such validation experiments, the spatial analysis reported here provides an unprecedented view on an occluded MMD artery at the single cell level. Our results unveil VSMC phenotypic switching and inflammatory immune cell infiltration in the intima layer and provide a rationale for cellular fibronectin as potential biomarker for MMD in plasma.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (40.3MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the patients and families who participated in this study. We thank Martin Guilliams, Charlotte Scott and the VIB Spatial Catalyst for advice and access to the MACSima™ Imaging System. We acknowledge help from Janick Mathys on the single cell data analysis and we thank the VIB Proteomics Core and Lode Denolf for help with analysis of the mass spectrometry samples.

Abbreviations

ECM

Extracellular matrix

IFN

Interferon

LC–MS/MS

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

MMA

Moyamoya angiopathy

MMD

Moyamoya disease

MMS

Moyamoya syndrome

MS

Mass spectrometry

VSMC

Vascular smooth muscle cell

Author contributions

Investigation: CA, JVD; Formal analysis and data curation: JuM and PW; Visualization: CA, JuM and PW Resources: FV, WDS, EVH, DH; Writing—Original Draft: CA, JoM, PW, BD and FI; Writing—Review & Editing: JuM, FV, ED, AS, SL, WDS, EF, KG, EVH, JVD and DH; Conceptualization: DH, EVH, BD and FI; Supervision: BD and FI. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

F.I. acknowledges support from Ghent University Concerted Research Action grant BOF21/GOA/033 and Starting Grant BOF/STA/202209/011, as well as from the European Research Council (ERC Consolidator Grant #101089193). W.D.S. acknowledges support for a medium scale research infrastructure grant from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; grant number I003318N). B.D. is supported by Odysseus Type 1 grant 3G0H8318 of Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) and the Ghent University Special Research Fund (grants 01N10319 and BOF/BAF/4y/2024/01/505). D.H. and B.D. are members of the European Reference Networks for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND), the Solve-RD Consortium and the European Rare Disease Research Alliance (ERDERA).

Data availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data of the laser capture microdissection (LCM) and plasma proteomics have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository25 with the dataset identifiers PXD057183 and PXD063236, respectively. All code and data tables used to analyze the spatial proteomics data (image, single cell, differential protein statistics) is available in a GitHub repository archived on Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.17158033.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of UZ Gent (EC: 2019/1430). All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of UZ Gent and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written informed consents for multiomics analysis and publication of results were obtained from all patients.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Caroline Asselman, Jozefien Meersschaut and Patrick Willems contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Bart Dermaut, Email: Bart.Dermaut@ugent.be.

Francis Impens, Email: Francis.Impens@vib-ugent.be.

References

  • 1.Masuda, J., Ogata, J. & Yutani, C. Smooth muscle cell proliferation and localization of macrophages and T cells in the occlusive intracranial major arteries in moyamoya disease. Stroke24(12), 1960–1967. 10.1161/01.str.24.12.1960 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kuroda, S. et al. Diagnostic criteria for moyamoya disease—2021 revised version. Neurol. Med. Chir.62(7), 307–312. 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0072 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scott, R. M. & Smith, E. R. Moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.360(12), 1226–1237. 10.1056/NEJMra0804622 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Asselman, C., Hemelsoet, D., Eggermont, D., Dermaut, B. & Impens, F. Moyamoya disease emerging as an immune-related angiopathy. Trends Mol. Med.28(11), 939–950. 10.1016/j.molmed.2022.08.009 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kuriyama, S. et al. Prevalence and clinicoepidemiological features of moyamoya disease in Japan: Findings from a nationwide epidemiological survey. Stroke39(1), 42–47. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490714 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kamada, F. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies RNF213 as the first moyamoya disease gene. J. Hum. Genet.56(1), 34–40. 10.1038/jhg.2010.132 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu, W. et al. Identification of RNF213 as a susceptibility gene for moyamoya disease and its possible role in vascular development. PLoS ONE6(7), e22542. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022542 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Otten, E. G. et al. Ubiquitylation of lipopolysaccharide by RNF213 during bacterial infection. Nature594(7861), 111–116. 10.1038/s41586-021-03566-4 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thery, F. et al. Ring finger protein 213 assembles into a sensor for ISGylated proteins with antimicrobial activity. Nat. Commun.12(1), 5772. 10.1038/s41467-021-26061-w (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Houzelstein, D. et al. The ring finger protein 213 gene (Rnf213) contributes to Rift Valley fever resistance in mice. Mamm. Genome32(1), 30–37. 10.1007/s00335-020-09856-y (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mertens, R. et al. The genetic basis of moyamoya disease. Transl. Stroke Res.13(1), 25–45. 10.1007/s12975-021-00940-2 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Strunk, D., Diehl, R. R., Veltkamp, R., Meuth, S. G. & Kraemer, M. Progression of initially unilateral moyamoya angiopathy in Caucasian Europeans. J. Neurol.270(9), 4415–4422. 10.1007/s00415-023-11793-0 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Church, E. W. et al. Clinical course of unilateral moyamoya disease. Neurosurgery87(6), 1262–1268. 10.1093/neuros/nyaa284 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Savolainen, M. et al. Moyamoya angiopathy: Long-term follow-up study in a Finnish population. J. Neurol.266(3), 574–581. 10.1007/s00415-018-9154-7 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ok, T. et al. RNF213 R4810K variant in suspected unilateral moyamoya disease predicts contralateral progression. J. Am. Heart Assoc.11(15), e025676. 10.1161/JAHA.122.025676 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Research Committee on the P, Treatment of Spontaneous Occlusion of the Circle of W, Health Labour Sciences Research Grant for Research on Measures for Infractable D. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of moyamoya disease (spontaneous occlusion of the circle of Willis). Neurol. Med. Chir. 52(5), 245–66 (2012). 10.2176/nmc.52.245 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Plagnol, V. et al. A robust model for read count data in exome sequencing experiments and implications for copy number variant calling. Bioinformatics28(21), 2747–2754. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts526 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Richards, S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology. Genet. Med.17(5), 405–424. 10.1038/gim.2015.30 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods9(7), 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep.7(1), 16878. 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stringer, C., Wang, T., Michaelos, M. & Pachitariu, M. Cellpose: A generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat. Methods18(1), 100–106. 10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berg, S. et al. ilastik: Interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nat. Methods16(12), 1226–1232. 10.1038/s41592-019-0582-9 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F. & Regev, A. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol.33(5), 495–502. 10.1038/nbt.3192 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sticker, A., Goeminne, L., Martens, L. & Clement, L. Robust summarization and inference in proteome-wide label-free quantification. Mol. Cell. Proteomics19(7), 1209–1219. 10.1074/mcp.RA119.001624 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: A hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res.50(D1), D543–D552. 10.1093/nar/gkab1038 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guey, S. et al. Rare RNF213 variants in the C-terminal region encompassing the RING-finger domain are associated with moyamoya angiopathy in Caucasians. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.25(8), 995–1003. 10.1038/ejhg.2017.92 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lauer, A. et al. Cerebrovascular disease progression in patients with ACTA2 Arg179 pathogenic variants. Neurology96(4), e538–e552. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011210 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karla, A. R. et al. SAMHD1 compound heterozygous rare variants associated with moyamoya and mitral valve disease in the absence of other features of Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A194(4), e63486. 10.1002/ajmg.a.63486 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Geyer, P. E. et al. Plasma Proteome Profiling to detect and avoid sample-related biases in biomarker studies. EMBO Mol. Med.11(11), e10427. 10.15252/emmm.201910427 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Canavero, I. et al. Clinical management of moyamoya patients. J. Clin. Med.10(16), 3628. 10.3390/jcm10163628 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Atiq, F. & O’Donnell, J. S. Novel functions for von Willebrand factor. Blood144(12), 1247–1256. 10.1182/blood.2023021915 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Black, S., Kushner, I. & Samols, D. C-reactive protein. J. Biol. Chem.279(47), 48487–48490. 10.1074/jbc.R400025200 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Simoni, L. et al. Complement C4A regulates autoreactive B Cells in murine lupus. Cell Rep.33(5), 108330. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108330 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hall, R. C., Vaidya, A. M., Schiemann, W. P., Pan, Q. & Lu, Z. R. RNA-Seq analysis of extradomain A and extradomain B fibronectin as extracellular matrix markers for cancer. Cells12(5), 685. 10.3390/cells12050685 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Heo, J. H. et al. Fibulin-5 is a tumour suppressor inhibiting cell migration and invasion in ovarian cancer. J Clin Pathol.69(2), 109–116. 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203129 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wen, J. et al. Increased OIT3 in macrophages promotes PD-L1 expression and hepatocellular carcinogenesis via NF-kappaB signaling. Exp. Cell. Res.428(2), 113651. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2023.113651 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Han, W. et al. Circulating sortilin levels are associated with inflammation in patients with moyamoya disease. Metab. Brain Dis.36(1), 103–109. 10.1007/s11011-020-00616-0 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kim, J. H. et al. Chemical and perfusion markers as predictors of moyamoya disease progression and complication types. Sci. Rep.14(1), 56. 10.1038/s41598-023-47984-y (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu, C. et al. Innate immune cell profiling in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with moyamoya disease. Inflammation10.1007/s10753-024-02201-4 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liu, E. et al. Clinical value of the systemic immune-inflammation index in moyamoya disease. Front. Neurol.14, 1123951. 10.3389/fneur.2023.1123951 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.To, W. S. & Midwood, K. S. Plasma and cellular fibronectin: distinct and independent functions during tissue repair. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair4, 21. 10.1186/1755-1536-4-21 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sesen, J. et al. Non-invasive urinary biomarkers in moyamoya disease. Front Neurol.12, 661952. 10.3389/fneur.2021.661952 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Uchida, Y. et al. CD204-positive monocytes and macrophages ameliorate septic shock by suppressing proinflammatory cytokine production in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Rep.23, 100791. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100791 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Strizova, Z. et al. M1/M2 macrophages and their overlaps—Myth or reality?. Clin. Sci.137(15), 1067–1093. 10.1042/CS20220531 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dreiza, C. M. et al. The small heat shock protein, HSPB6, in muscle function and disease. Cell Stress Chaperones15(1), 1–11. 10.1007/s12192-009-0127-8 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mineharu, Y. et al. Autosomal dominant moyamoya disease maps to chromosome 17q25.3. Neurology70(24 Pt 2), 2357–2363. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000291012.49986.f9 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mineharu, Y. & Miyamoto, S. RNF213 and GUCY1A3 in moyamoya disease: Key regulators of metabolism, inflammation, and vascular stability. Front. Neurol.12, 687088. 10.3389/fneur.2021.687088 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bang, O. Y., Fujimura, M. & Kim, S. K. The pathophysiology of moyamoya disease: An update. J. Stroke18(1), 12–20. 10.5853/jos.2015.01760 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guo, Q. et al. Proteomic and metabolomic characterizations of moyamoya disease patient sera. Brain Behav.13(12), e3328. 10.1002/brb3.3328 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Carrozzini, T. et al. Proteome profiling of the dura mater in patients with moyamoya angiopathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24(13), 11194. 10.3390/ijms241311194 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gatti, L. et al. Multi-omic approaches for biomarker discovery in moyamoya disease. Clin. Transl. Discov.4(2), e270. 10.1002/ctd2.270 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.He, S. et al. Upregulated cytoskeletal proteins promote pathological angiogenesis in moyamoya disease. Stroke54(12), 3153–3164. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044476 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cuoco, J. A. et al. ACTA2 cerebral arteriopathy: Not just a puff of smoke. Cerebrovasc. Dis.46(3–4), 161–171. 10.1159/000493863 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guo, D. C. et al. Mutations in smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2) cause coronary artery disease, stroke, and moyamoya disease, along with thoracic aortic disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet.84(5), 617–627. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.04.007 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Milewicz, D. M. et al. De novo ACTA2 mutation causes a novel syndrome of multisystemic smooth muscle dysfunction. Am. J. Med. Genet. A152A(10), 2437–2443. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33657 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Roder, C. et al. Analysis of ACTA2 in European moyamoya disease patients. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol.15(2), 117–122. 10.1016/j.ejpn.2010.09.002 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Senju, C. et al. Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome with SAMHD1 deficiency can be diagnosed by unscheduled DNA synthesis test. Front. Pediatr.10, 1048002. 10.3389/fped.2022.1048002 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Coggins, S. A., Mahboubi, B., Schinazi, R. F. & Kim, B. SAMHD1 functions and human diseases. Viruses12(4), 382. 10.3390/v12040382 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Xin, B. et al. Homozygous mutation in SAMHD1 gene causes cerebral vasculopathy and early onset stroke. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108(13), 5372–5377. 10.1073/pnas.1014265108 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Abdelgadir, A. et al. A better understanding of moyamoya in trisomy 21: A systematic review. Cureus14(3), e23502. 10.7759/cureus.23502 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Vargiami, E. et al. Moyamoya syndrome and neurofibromatosis type 1. Ital. J. Pediatr.40, 59. 10.1186/1824-7288-40-59 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Phi, J. H., Wang, K. C., Lee, J. Y. & Kim, S. K. Moyamoya syndrome: A window of moyamoya disease. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc.57(6), 408–414. 10.3340/jkns.2015.57.6.408 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dini, G. et al. NFIA haploinsufficiency: Case series and literature review. Front. Pediatr.11, 1292654. 10.3389/fped.2023.1292654 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Prontera, P. et al. Juvenile moyamoya and craniosynostosis in a child with deletion 1p32p31: Expanding the clinical spectrum of 1p32p31 deletion syndrome and a review of the literature. Int. J. Mol. Sci.18(9), 1998. 10.3390/ijms18091998 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pires de Oliveira-Sobrinho, R. et al. Microdeletion 1p32p31 presenting with moyamoya disease and incomplete hippocampal inversion. Mol. Syndromol.15(3), 225–231. 10.1159/000535240 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Levinson, T. & Wasserman, A. C-reactive protein velocity (CRPv) as a new biomarker for the early detection of acute infection/inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23(15), 8100. 10.3390/ijms23158100 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Heurich, M., Focking, M. & Cotter, D. Complement C4, C4A and C4a—What they do and how they differ. Brain Behav. Immun. Health39, 100809. 10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100809 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lieverse, R. I. Y. et al. Human fibronectin extra domain B as a biomarker for targeted therapy in cancer. Mol. Oncol.14(7), 1555–1568. 10.1002/1878-0261.12705 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Castellanos, M. et al. Plasma cellular-fibronectin concentration predicts hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke35(7), 1671–1676. 10.1161/01.STR.0000131656.47979.39 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lemanska-Perek, A. et al. Analysis of soluble molecular fibronectin-fibrin complexes and EDA-fibronectin concentration in plasma of patients with atherosclerosis. Inflammation39(3), 1059–1068. 10.1007/s10753-016-0336-0 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hansen, A. H. et al. A serologically assessed neo-epitope biomarker of cellular fibronectin degradation is related to pulmonary fibrosis. Clin. Biochem.118, 110599. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110599 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Li, F. et al. Evaluation of EDB fibronectin in plasma, patient-derived xenograft formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and fresh frozen tumor tissues using immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS. J. Proteome Res.21(10), 2331–2340. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00182 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ferriero, D. M. et al. Management of stroke in neonates and children: A scientific statement from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke50(3), e51–e96. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000183 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Smith, E. R. Moyamoya biomarkers. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc.57(6), 415–421. 10.3340/jkns.2015.57.6.415 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lehman, L. L. et al. Pediatric moyamoya biomarkers: Narrowing the knowledge gap. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol.43, 101002. 10.1016/j.spen.2022.101002 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gorla, G. et al. Angiopoietin-2 associates with poor prognosis in moyamoya angiopathy. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol.11(6), 1590–1603. 10.1002/acn3.52076 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kang, H. S. et al. Plasma matrix metalloproteinases, cytokines and angiogenic factors in moyamoya disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry81(6), 673–678. 10.1136/jnnp.2009.191817 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Milewicz, D. M. et al. Genetic variants promoting smooth muscle cell proliferation can result in diffuse and diverse vascular diseases: Evidence for a hyperplastic vasculomyopathy. Genet. Med.12(4), 196–203. 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181cdd687 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chen, R., McVey, D. G., Shen, D., Huang, X. & Ye, S. Phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis. J. Am. Heart Assoc.12(20), e031121. 10.1161/JAHA.123.031121 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wirka, R. C. et al. Atheroprotective roles of smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation and the TCF21 disease gene as revealed by single-cell analysis. Nat. Med.25(8), 1280–1289. 10.1038/s41591-019-0512-5 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Stein, J. J., Iwuchukwu, C., Maier, K. G. & Gahtan, V. Thrombospondin-1-induced vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation are functionally dependent on microRNA-21. Surgery155(2), 228–233. 10.1016/j.surg.2013.08.003 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Moura, R., Tjwa, M., Vandervoort, P., Cludts, K. & Hoylaerts, M. F. Thrombospondin-1 activates medial smooth muscle cells and triggers neointima formation upon mouse carotid artery ligation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.27(10), 2163–2169. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.151282 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Alesutan, I. et al. Periostin augments vascular smooth muscle cell calcification via beta-catenin signaling. Biomolecules12(8), 1157. 10.3390/biom12081157 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kim, C. W. et al. Disturbed flow promotes arterial stiffening through thrombospondin-1. Circulation136(13), 1217–1232. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026361 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kim, H. R., Park, J. S., Karabulut, H., Yasmin, F. & Jun, C. D. Transgelin-2: A double-edged sword in immunity and cancer metastasis. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol.9, 606149. 10.3389/fcell.2021.606149 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Na, B. R. et al. TAGLN2 regulates T cell activation by stabilizing the actin cytoskeleton at the immunological synapse. J. Cell. Biol.209(1), 143–162. 10.1083/jcb.201407130 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Cautivo, K. M., Steer, C. A. & Molofsky, A. B. Immune outposts in the adventitia: One foot in sea and one on shore. Curr. Opin. Immunol.64, 34–41. 10.1016/j.coi.2020.03.005 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.He, S. et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals dynamic cell populations and immune infiltration in moyamoya disease. J. Am. Heart. Assoc.14(18), e041168. 10.1161/JAHA.124.041168 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Saigusa, R., Winkels, H. & Ley, K. T cell subsets and functions in atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.17(7), 387–401. 10.1038/s41569-020-0352-5 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Fox, B. M., Dorschel, K. B., Lawton, M. T. & Wanebo, J. E. Pathophysiology of vascular stenosis and remodeling in moyamoya disease. Front. Neurol.12, 661578. 10.3389/fneur.2021.661578 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Tchernychev, B. et al. Inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by ENPP1: The role of CD73 and the adenosine signaling axis. Cells13(13), 1128. 10.3390/cells13131128 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wang, H. et al. FN1 is a prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune infiltrates in gastric cancers. Front. Oncol.12, 918719. 10.3389/fonc.2022.918719 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Cao, L. et al. Experimental animal models for moyamoya disease: A species-oriented scoping review. Front. Surg.9, 929871. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.929871 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (40.3MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The mass spectrometry proteomics data of the laser capture microdissection (LCM) and plasma proteomics have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository25 with the dataset identifiers PXD057183 and PXD063236, respectively.

The mass spectrometry proteomics data of the laser capture microdissection (LCM) and plasma proteomics have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository25 with the dataset identifiers PXD057183 and PXD063236, respectively. All code and data tables used to analyze the spatial proteomics data (image, single cell, differential protein statistics) is available in a GitHub repository archived on Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.17158033.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES