Skip to main content
JAAD Case Reports logoLink to JAAD Case Reports
. 2025 Oct 27;68:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2025.09.049

Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of trichoblastic carcinoma: Case presentation and discussion of clinical outcomes and considerations

Alicia Mizes 1,, Leah Laageide 1, Norhan Shamloul 1, Irina Lerman 1, Glynis Scott 1, Franki Lambert Smith 1, Abigail Franco 1
PMCID: PMC12800429  PMID: 41542304

Introduction

Trichoblastic carcinoma (TC) is a rare malignancy of follicular origin with only 105 previously published cases.1 It commonly affects the scalp or face of middle-aged men and typically presents as a single, smooth, or ulcerated nodule.1, 2, 3 The pathogenesis of TC is considered multifactorial, involving UV radiation, chronic skin irritation, and mutations in TP53, Wnt, and B-catenin that induce malignant transformation of germinative cells of a preexisting trichoblastoma. A comprehensive review reports de novo synthesis in a majority of cases (87.1%; 81/93).2,4 Practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment are not yet published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Current literature recommends surgical resection to obtain clear margins and adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for metastatic or unresectable tumors.2 Given that wide local excision (WLE) of TC frequently results in positive margins, we propose Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) be considered for treatment. Our case outlines a 68-year-old man with TC of the face successfully treated with MMS.

Case report

A 68-year-old White male with no significant past medical history presented to dermatology for a skin-colored nodule on the right jawline. It had gradually increased in size over 4 decades, but more recently he noted intermittent bleeding and inflammation with shaving. The nodule measured 2.2 × 1.5 cm with a firm, rubbery texture (Fig 1). No clinical lymphadenopathy was appreciated, and the differential included a neurofibroma, epidermal inclusion cyst, or lipoma.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Right jawline demonstrating a light pink, firm but mobile, 2.2 × 1.5 cm nodule. A, Clinical presentation at initial clinical visit for biopsy. B, Clinical presentation 3 months later at MMS appointment. C, Final defect after 2 stages of MMS. D, Final reconstruction with primary closure. MMS, Mohs micrographic surgery.

A deep punch biopsy identified multiple lobules of basaloid cells arranged in poorly defined clusters within the dermis with infiltration of cells into a mildly fibroblastic stroma (Fig 2, A). Cells showed a high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio, back-to-back crowding, and heterogeneity in nuclear size and shape (Fig 2, B). Some areas of the lesion showed sheets of basaloid cells with central necrosis forming pseudoglandular spaces. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for cytokeratin 7, GATA3, and BerEP4 but negative for cytokeratin 20, TRPS1, CD56, CDX2, synaptophysin, and chromogranin (Fig 2, C-E).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

A, The 2× magnification hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) pathology slide showing multiple lobules of malignant basaloid cells arranged in balls within the dermis with stranding of cells into a mildly fibroblastic stroma. B, The 10× magnification of H&E with tumor cells showing a high nuclear to cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio with small ducts noted within the groups of cells. C, The 20× magnification of H&E demonstrates closely packed basaloid cells with a high N/C ratio and heterogeneity in nuclear size and shape. Despite the atypia, the organoid morphology of the lesion, mimicking primitive hair germ structures, can be appreciated. D, The 20× and (E) 100× magnification of H&E of positive first Mohs layer. The 10× magnification of immunohistochemistry staining showing positivity for (F) CK7, (G) GATA3, and (H) BerEP4. Additional staining was negative for CK20, CDX2, TRPS1, CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin (not pictured).

The patient subsequently underwent positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) that identified no hypermetabolic adenopathy or fluorodeoxyglucose-avid distant metastases. A left cervical lymph node (LN) of 3 mm with mild uptake was thought to be reactive; fine needle aspiration was nondiagnostic. The case was reviewed at multidisciplinary tumor board with referral to otolaryngology for discussion of sentinel LN biopsy, which the patient declined. MMS with frozen sections was recommended over slow MMS, given the tumor’s clear visibility on hematoxylin and eosin and contiguous nature. During MMS, the tumor cleared after 2 stages with a final defect size of 3.7 × 3.1 cm and was repaired with a primary closure. At a skin examination 5 months later, he had no signs of recurrence or palpable lymphadenopathy.

Case discussion

TC is a rare adnexal neoplasm that often resembles basal cell carcinoma clinically and histologically. It is classified morphologically as either low-grade or high-grade and most commonly occurs de novo on the face. TC can be distinguished from basal cell carcinoma with follicular differentiation by its lack of retraction artifact and epidermal connection and presence of a nonmyxoid, hypercellular, fibrous stroma.2,3 Low-grade TC shows peripheral palisading basophilic cells that may be adjacent to a benign trichoblastoma.3,5 High-grade TC demonstrates brisk mitotic activity, geographical necrosis, invasion of subcutaneous adipose tissue, and may show focal perineural and lymphovascular invasion.4,6 Immunohistochemistry is helpful but not specific, with positive markers including BerEP4 and CK7 and negative markers including synaptophysin, chromogranin, CK20, EMA, CEA, HMB45, and CD10 (Table I).2,5

Table I.

Comparison of clinical and dermoscopic features and H&E and IHC stains for basal cell carcinoma, trichoblastoma, and trichoblastic carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma Trichoblastoma Trichoblastic carcinoma
Clinical features Pearly pink or pigmented (brown, blue, or black) papule or plaque, often ulcerated Well-circumscribed, skin-colored to brown or blue-black papule or nodule Large, growing, sometimes ulcerated, skin-colored to blue-gray, pink, or yellow plaque or nodule
Dermoscopic features7 Arborizing vessels, pink structureless areas, microulcerations, spoke-wheel and leaf-like structures, blue ovoid nests, microulcerations Blue-gray homogenous areas, white-yellow structureless areas, and a pinkish to orange background can have thin, arborizing vessels, but background color is paler and the vessels are thinner than expected in BCC Heterogenous pigmentation with blue and black pigmented areas with whitish veil can have thin arborizing vessels and blue-gray ovoid globules and nests
H&E features1 Blue islands of basaloid cells with peripheral palisading, epidermal connection often present, variable mitotic activity, variable pleomorphism, variable necrosis, tumor-stroma clefting (retraction artifact), fibromyxoid stroma; subtypes include superficial, nodular, infiltrative, micronodular, morpheaform, basosquamous, adenoid, fibroepitheliomatous type Cribriform to solid nodules of basaloid cells with peripheral palisading, no epidermal connection, variable mitotic activity, minimal pleomorphism, absent necrosis, fibrocellular nonmyxoid stroma with papillary mesenchymal bodies, and stroma-stroma clefting (no true retraction artifact) Infiltrative growth pattern of cribriform to solid nodules of basaloid cells with variable peripheral palisading, no epidermal connection, conspicuous mitotic activity, nuclear pleomorphism, focal necrosis, fibrocellular nonmyxoid stroma, occasional papillary mesenchymal bodies, and background benign trichoblastoma may be seen
Positive IHC stains2,5 Androgen receptor, BerEP4, CD10 (stains epithelial cells), BCL2 (diffuse), Variable: GATA3 CD10 (stains stroma), CD34 (stains stroma), BCL2 (foal, peripheral epithelial cells), BerEP4, Variable: CK20 BerEP4, p63, PHLDA1, Variable: GATA3, CK7
Negative IHC stains2,5 CK20, SOX10, CD34, CD44, MART1, S-100, EMA, CK7 (variable) Androgen receptor, CK7, GATA3, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CK20, EMA, CEA, HMB45 CD34, CK7, CK15, CEA, CAM5.2, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CK20, EMA, CEA, HMB45

BCC, Basal cell carcinoma; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

Dermoscopic features can be nonspecific, and in some cases of subcutaneous trichoblastoma or trichoblastic carcinoma, dermoscopy can show normal skin.

Because the risk of metastases ranges from 5% to 11%, WLE with a lateral margin of 1-3 cm to deep fascia is recommended.2,8,9 In a recent systematic review of 127 patients with TC and trichoblastic carcinosarcoma, 75 patients (50.1%) were treated with surgical excision and 22 patients (17.3%) with MMS.1 In a case series by Thomas et al, 65% (14/21) of TCs presented on the face with an average size of 2.3 cm (range 0.7-15 cm). Standard excision attained clear margins in only 38% (8/21) of cases, with an average of 1.6 revisions. Only 5 cases underwent primary closure, 8 required skin grafts, 6 involved local flaps, and 2 combined a flap and graft technique. Despite WLE, 3 of 18 cases recurred over a mean follow-up of 36 months, and 1 developed LN metastases.8 In 93 cases reviewed by Boettler et al, 62.4% presented on the face or scalp with an average size of 4.3 cm (0.7-20.0 cm, SD: 4.4). WLE was performed in 84 cases with an average margin of 0.97 cm (0.5-3.0 cm, SD: 0.42). Among 40 patients with reported follow-up, 4 developed local recurrence, 5 had nodal metastases, 3 had distant metastases, and 1 patient died from metastatic disease.2 Treatment of locally advanced and metastatic TC includes lymphadenectomy, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy. Reported systemic agents include carboplatin, cisplatin with 5-fluorouracil, sunitinib, and vismodegib.1, 2, 3

To date, only 7 studies report MMS for TC in 23 patients (Table II). The largest case series by Gonzalez-Lara et al reports 17 cases of TC treated with slow MMS and with clearance attained in 1 stage for 13 cases, 2 stages for 1 case, 3 in 2 cases, and unattainable in 1 case, despite 9 stages. Seven cases underwent primary closure, 4 required a skin graft, 2 involved local flaps, 2 healed by secondary intention, 1 had a composite graft, and 1 utilized a nasal prosthetic.9 The other 6 studies present single case reports of TC treated with MMS with frozen section involving a maximum of 2 reported MMS stages and closures including linear, skin grafting, and a retroauricular flap (Table II).3,5,10,11

Table II.

Previously reported cases utilizing Mohs surgery for treatment of trichoblastic carcinoma

Article Patient Preoperative size Length present Location Number of stages Closure
Park et al, 20243 65-y-old man 1 × 1 cm 1 y Glabella 1 Complex linear closure
Gonzalez-Lara et al, 20229 (n = 17) 66-y-old (average) male (n = 12), female (n = 5) 1.5 × 1.5 cm Not specified Head and neck (n = 13) 1 (n = 13), 2 (n = 1), 3 (n = 2), unresectable (n = 1) Skin graft (n = 4), direct closure (n = 7), local flap (n = 2), secondary intention (n = 2), composite graft (n = 1), nasal epithesis (n = 1)
Leeman et al, 20215 50-y-old woman 1.5 × 1.5 cm 10 y Chin Not specified Not specified
Garcia et al, 202010 94-y-old woman 0.3 × 0.2 cm 6 mo Nasal tip 2 Full-thickness skin graft
Toberer et al 201712 35-y-old man Not specified Not specified Upper back Not specified Not specified
Cogrel, 201411 77-y-old man Not specified Not specified Concha 2 Retroauricular revolving door island flap
Müller et al, 201313 83-y-old woman 1 cm Not specified Back of nose Not specified Not specified

We report a case of facial TC with no evidence of metastasis on PET/CT and clearance of tumor after two MMS stages. Given the rarity of TC, no National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and a LN metastases rate exceeding 5%, we recommend PET/CT imaging, referral to surgical oncology, and discussion at a multidisciplinary tumor board. Given its contiguous nature, distinct appearance on hematoxylin and eosin staining, high recurrence rates, frequent occurrence in cosmetically sensitive areas, and difficulty attaining margin control with WLE, we propose that MMS be strongly considered as a treatment option for TC.

Conflicts of interest

None disclosed.

Footnotes

Funding sources: None.

Patient consent: The authors obtained written consent from the patient for their photographs and medical information to be published in print and online and with the understanding that this information may be publicly available. Patient consent forms were not provided to the journal but are retained by the authors.

IRB approval status: Not applicable.

References

  • 1.Wan L., Almatroud L., Park A., Khachemoune A. Trichoblastic carcinoma: a systematic review of an aggressive follicular neoplasm with an emphasis on Mohs micrographic surgery in management. Arch Dermatol Res. 2025;317:783. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04275-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boettler M.A., Shahwan K.T., Abidi N.Y., Carr D.R. Trichoblastic carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature. Arch Dermatol Res. 2022;314(5):399–403. doi: 10.1007/S00403-021-02241-Y/METRICS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Park L., Crasto D., Kubicki S.L., Rivlin D. Trichoblastic carcinoma in the glabella treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Cureus. 2024;16(6) doi: 10.7759/CUREUS.63060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Regauer S., Beham-Schmid C., Okcu M., Hartner E., Mannweiler S. Trichoblastic carcinoma (“malignant trichoblastoma”) with lymphatic and hematogenous metastases. Mod Pathol. 2000;13(6):673–678. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leeman A., De Cuba E.M.V., Jaspars L.H., Quint K.D., Genders R.E. A low-grade trichoblastic carcinoma treated with mohs micrographic surgery. Case Rep Dermatol. 2021;13(1):129. doi: 10.1159/000512871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mehta A., Davey J., Wiedemeyer K., Brenn T. Morphologically high-grade trichoblastic carcinoma: a clinicopathological study with long-term clinical follow-up. Histopathology. 2021;78(7):970–975. doi: 10.1111/his.14325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sławińska M., Płaszczyńska A., Lakomy J., et al. Significance of dermoscopy in association with clinical features in differentiation of basal cell carcinoma and benign trichoblastic tumours. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14(16):3964. doi: 10.3390/CANCERS14163964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thomas M., Bruant-Rodier C., Bodin F., Cribier B., Huther M., Dissaux C. De l’intérêt de différencier les carcinomes trichoblastiques (CT) des carcinomes basocellulaires (CBC). À propos de 21 cas. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2017;62(3):212–218. doi: 10.1016/J.ANPLAS.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gonzalez-Lara L., Bonsang B., Zimmermann U., et al. Formalin-fixed tissue Mohs surgery (slow Mohs) for trichoblastic carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(10):e827–e828. doi: 10.1111/JDV.18309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Garcia A., Nguyen J.M., Stetson C.L., Tarbox M.B. Facial trichoblastic carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery: a new indication for Mohs? JAAD Case Rep. 2020;6(6):561. doi: 10.1016/J.JDCR.2020.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cogrel O. Prise en charge chirurgicale d’un carcinome trichoblastique de la conque de l’oreille par lambeau de Gordon-Masson. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2014;141(6-7):474–475. doi: 10.1016/J.ANNDER.2014.04.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Toberer F., Rütten A., Requena L., et al. Eosinophil-rich trichoblastic carcinoma with aggressive clinical course in a young man. J Cutan Pathol. 2017;44(11):986–990. doi: 10.1111/cup.13031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Muller C.S.L., Schiekofer C., Korner R., Pfohler C., Vogt T. Improved patient-centered care with effective use of Integra in dermatologic reconstructive surgery. JDDG-J Ger Soc Dermatology. 2013;11(6):537–548. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAAD Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES