Skip to main content
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society logoLink to Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
. 2004 Dec;102:107–122.

AUTISM WITH OPHTHALMOLOGIC MALFORMATIONS: THE PLOT THICKENS

Marilyn T Miller 1,*,§, Kerstin Strömland 1, Liana Ventura 1, Maria Johansson 1, Jose M Bandim 1, Christopher Gillberg 1
PMCID: PMC1280092  PMID: 15747750

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To review the association of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in individuals manifesting thalidomide embryopathy and Möbius sequence and compare them with three new studies in which ASD was also associated with ocular and systemic malformations: (1) a Swedish study of individuals with CHARGE association (Coloboma, Heart, choanal Atresia, developmental or growth Retardation, Genital anomaly, and Ear involvement); (2) a Swedish study of Goldenhar syndrome; and (3) Brazilian Möbius syndrome (sequence) study.

Methods

In the Swedish CHARGE study, 31 patients met the inclusion criteria (3+ or 4 of the common characteristics of the CHARGE syndrome). The same team of investigators also evaluated 20 Swedish patients with Goldenhar syndrome. In the Brazilian Möbius study, 28 children with a diagnosis of Möbius sequence were studied; some children had a history of exposure during their mother’s pregnancy to the abortifacient drug misoprostol in an unsuccessful abortion attempt

Results

In the CHARGE study, five patients had the more severe autism disorder and five had autistic-like condition. In the Goldenhar study, two had autism disorder and one had autistic-like condition. In the Brazilian Möbius study, the systemic findings of the misoprostol-exposed and misoprostol-unexposed patients were almost undistinguishable, and ASD was present in both groups (autism disorder in five and autistic-like condition in three).

Conclusion

Autism spectrum disorder has been reported in two conditions with known early pregnancy exposure to the teratogenic agents thalidomide and misoprostol. In the Brazilian Möbius study, autism also occurred in both the misoprostol-exposed and misoprostol-unexposed groups. Autism also was present in patients with both CHARGE association and Goldenhar syndrome.

INTRODUCTION

The beginning of the story was an unanticipated finding of autism while the investigators were engaged in the study of 86 Swedes who had been identified in the early 1960s as having the typical findings of thalidomide embryopathy and a maternal history of thalidomide intake during early pregnancy.13 Because of the large number of affected individuals described in the literature, including many informative cases in which the time of drug intake was known, it has been previously determined that the teratogenic-sensitive period extended from day 20 to day 36 after fertilization.46 The literature also indicated that early exposure to the drug (days 20 to 25) resulted in involvement of the cranial nerves (especially VI and VII) and external ear, abnormal ocular movement such as Duane syndrome, aberrant lacrimation, and thumb anomalies.79 The four cases of autism in the Swedish study manifested the characteristic effects of early exposure.10

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by impairment in social interaction and communication and associated with repetitive behaviors and interests. There are several clinical ASD phenotypes, including autistic disorder, childhood autism, Asperger syndrome, and atypical autism (also referred to as autistic-like condition and pervasive developmental disorders not otherwise specified). The pathophysiology of ASD remains elusive, despite clues from genetic studies, neurochemistry, autopsy reports, functional research, radiologic imaging, research on environmental influences, and many other approaches.1114

A subset of individuals with ASD have associated medical conditions (eg, syndromes, chromosomal anomalies).11 Insight into these comorbid conditions may give some insight into the pathophysiology of autism, and the thalidomide association has provided unique information into the timing factors of the developmental insult in some cases.11,12

Intrigued by the association of autism with an uncommon type of strabismus (Duane syndrome) and facial nerve palsy in the thalidomide-exposed individuals, and by a few case reports of a connection between Möbius syndrome with its involvement of cranial nerves VI and VII and autism,1517 a multidisciplinary team further explored these associations in another Swedish study.18 Möbius syndrome has more recently been designated “Möbius sequence,” since the term “sequence” defines a cascade of secondary events that occur after a single embryonic insult from heterogeneous causes. Although many functional anomalies may coexist in Möbius sequence, the most accepted clinical criterion is evidence of congenital sixth and seventh cranial nerve involvement. The systemic and ocular findings of the 25 Swedish patients in the 1995–1998 study were similar to those described in the Möbius literature, except for the remarkable finding that 7 of 22 (32%) had autistic disorder or autistic-like condition.18,19 As in the thalidomide study, the neuropsychiatric evaluations were performed by child psychiatrists. No consistent etiologic event could be ascertained through history of other tests, except that there appeared to be more than the usual adverse pregnancy events, such as bleeding (8 patients), a chronic villi sampling procedure (1), and history of drug use (1).18

After the Swedish Möbius study, the multidisciplinary team decided to study other conditions in which ASD had been noted with craniofacial syndrome. They selected Goldenhar syndrome (oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia syndrome) and the CHARGE association because of case reports of autism in these conditions2022 and the similarity of some of the craniofacial malformations. The findings of these two studies will be described here.

Another related chapter to the ophthalmology-autism connection was reported in the early 1990s in the literature from South America, especially from Brazil. A number of papers described a group of children who had limb anomalies and whose mothers had taken an abortifacient drug, misoprostol (Cytotec), early in pregnancy.2328 Alone, misoprostol appears to be a poor abortifacient drug; it often only causes some bleeding or uterine contraction but with the pregnancy continuing to term. In addition to limb anomalies, many of these affected individuals had cranial nerve malformations and manifested the characteristic findings of Möbius sequence.2932 Most of these cases were from Brazil, where abortion is illegal, except for a few reasons, but where there are a large number of self-induced attempts at abortion, often with the use of misoprostol early in pregnancy. To further investigate this misoprostol-Möbius connection, a prospective study of patients with the diagnosis of Möbius syndrome/sequence was undertaken by Ventura33 in Pernambuco, Brazil. The purpose of her study was to describe systemic, neuropsychiatric, and ophthalmic findings of these patients with Möbius sequence. The study included children with Möbius sequence from pregnancies both with and without misoprostol exposure. The results will be described.

METHODS

Swedish CHARGE Study (1998–2002)

A multidisciplinary study in Sweden evaluated patients referred by the medical profession with a diagnosis of CHARGE association or with a registered diagnosis of CHARGE. Although the literature is not consistent as to what clinical characteristics are necessary to make the diagnosis, the original description of CHARGE association by Pagon and associates34 (Coloboma, Heart, choanal Atresia, Retarded growth and/or development, Genital hypoplasia, and Ear anomalies and/or deafness) was used to establish the key characteristics. Most patients had four characteristics, but a few had three with other frequently associated systemic anomalies. Thirty-one patients were considered to meet the minimal requirements for CHARGE association. The ophthalmic and systemic evaluations were performed with predetermined protocols similar to those of the Swedish Möbius study, and by essentially the same multidisciplinary team. In the CHARGE and Goldenhar studies, the criteria for autistic disorder from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) were used, in addition to the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), the Autistic Behavior Checklist (ABC), and the Autism Diagnostic Interview—Revised (ADIR).3538

Goldenhar/Hemifacial Microsomia Study (oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia spectrum) (1998–2002)

The Goldenhar/hemifacial microsomia (HFM) study of 20 patients was done concurrently with the CHARGE study, and by the same team. Certain modifications were necessary because of the differences in clinical characteristics of these two entities. Vertebral anomalies, ocular dermoids, and mandibular hypoplasia are characteristic of the Goldenhar syndrome but not as frequent in the CHARGE association. In contrast, ocular coloboma and genitourinary and cardiovascular malformations are more frequently noted in the CHARGE syndrome. However, a comprehensive physical examination was done on all patients. In the neuropsychiatric evaluation, the methodology used was the same as in the CHARGE study.

In the neuropsychiatric evaluations of all individuals reported here, care was taken to remove items and criteria in diagnostic instruments when scoring for autism spectrum disorders might be affected by cranial nerve palsy and severe visual and hearing impairment (eg, items and criteria concerned with facial mimicry, eye contact, and intonation of speech).

The relevant ethics committees approved all Swedish studies.

Brazilian Möbius Study (2000–2001)

A prospective multidiscipline study was performed in Pernambuco, Brazil, an area in northeastern Brazil. Detailed pregnancy and social history was collected, with particular attention to the timing, dosage, and method of taking misoprostol or other abortifacient drugs. The inclusion criterion of Möbius sequence was evidence of involvement of the sixth and seventh cranial nerves.

The study was initiated in August 2000, and most of the patients were recruited in the first 6 months. Of the 31 patients presented with a possible diagnosis of Möbius, 28 met the criteria of the study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 was composed of children without known exposure to misoprostol, and group 2 consisted of children with a history of misoprostol exposure by their mothers in early pregnancy. Detailed social, demographic, and psychological data were obtained on 26 patients and ophthalmologic data on 28 patients. Initially, the mother was interviewed and a database of information about the pregnancy, including medical history, genetic background, and drug exposure, was created. The importance of truth and confidentiality and the purpose and methods of the study were explained to the mother, and an informed consent was signed. The investigators had some concern that there might be reluctance on the part of the mother to admit to taking the drugs. However, the observation of the team was that most mothers were very desirous of discussing their problems with nonjudgmental medical staff. On separate days the children were examined by a multidisciplinary team representing the specialties of pediatrics, ophthalmology, neurology, cardiology, otolaryngology, dentistry, genetics, psychiatry, speech and language, and radiology. All examinations were performed using a constant database similar to that of the Swedish Möbius study.

Psychiatric and intellectual evaluations were performed on children old enough to be formally evaluated. These included an interview utilizing the DSM IV and CARS.

The study met the requirements established by the Brazilian National Health Council for Research in Humans.

RESULTS

Swedish CHARGE Study

Table 1 indicates the systemic and functional abnormalities in 31 study patients with CHARGE association and compares them to estimates reported in the literature. Colobomas, often with microphthalmia, were prominent and observed in about 90% of the patients, which is slightly higher than reports in the literature and may represent some study ascertainment bias. In 19 patients the colobomas were bilateral but showed great variation in type, ranging from an isolated iris or disk coloboma to complex colobomas involving all uveal tissues (Table 2). Severe visual impairment was common. Sixteen patients had cardiovascular anomalies, with persistent ductal arteriosus being the most frequent type. Vestibular symptoms were surprisingly frequent. The ear anomalies and hearing loss included a “characteristic CHARGE ear,” other external ear malformation, and involvement of the inner ear structures. Although not part of the diagnostic criteria, the fairly frequent findings of facial nerve palsy, cleft lip or palate, and short stature have been documented also in the literature.3941

Table 1.

Swedish charge study: summary of most frequent malformations and functional problems, with comparison to a literature summary (n = 31)

Problem No. (%) Literature estimates*
Inclusion criteria anomalies
 Coloboma (19 bilateral, 4 unilateral) 28/31 (90) 80%–90%
 Microphthalmos (13) 27/31 (87) 80%–90%
 Heart 16/31 (52) 75%–80%
 Choanal atresia 11/31 (35) 59%–60%
 Retardation (severe 12) 21/28 (75) 100%
 Genital hypoplasia: cryptorchism (8), micropenis (8), small labia (1) 12/31 (39) 70%–80%
 External ear 28/31 (90) 90%
Other anomalies
 Short stature 15/31 (48) 70%
 Facial nerve 11/31 (35) Significant
 Cleft lip/palate 6/31 (19) 15%–20%
 Spine 8/31 (26) Rare
 Renal 4/31 (13) 15%–25%
Functional problems
 Eating 25/31 (81)
 Vestibular (balance) 21/24 (88)
 Speech 21/26 (81)
 Autism spectrum disorders (AD or ALC) 10/26 (38)
 Visual impairment§ 11/19 (58)
 Ear malformations 23/31 (74)
 Severe developmental delay 12/28 (43)

AD, autistic disorder; ALC, autistic-like condition.

*

Blake et al,39 Byerly and Pauli.40

Clinical estimate; no ultrasound done. In four patients there was obvious unilateral colobomas, but fellow microphthalmic eye was too small to evaluate formally. In a few, it was not clear whether there was an associated coloboma.

Six patients could not be evaluated for autism spectrum disorders; three were too young and three were completely deaf and blind.

§

Corrected visual acuity in best eye ≤0.3; 12 patients unable to test because of mental disability, although clinical impression was that eight of these had poor visual acuity from structural anomalies.

Eleven had inner ear malformations.

Table 2.

Swedish charge study: description of types of coloboma and microphthalmos

Condition No. of eyes
Coloboma (27 patients, 19 bilateral) 46
 Iris 4
 Iris + uvea 2
 Iris + uvea + optic nerve 15
 Uvea 5
 Uvea + optic nerve 10
 Optic nerve 10
Microphthalmos (13 patients, 8 bilateral) 21
Microphthalmos + coloboma 15
Iris + uvea 2
 Iris + uvea + optic nerve 10
 Uvea + optic nerve 1
 Optic nerve 2
 Microphthalmos (coloboma indeterminable) 4

Five individuals manifested characteristics of the full autistic disorder, and five had fewer characteristics and thus a diagnosis of autistic-like condition. Other patients showed only autistic traits but are not reported here. A comprehensive neuropsychiatric evaluation will be reported elsewhere (Johansson M, et al, “Autism spectrum disorders and underlying brain pathology in CHARGE association,” unpublished data, 2004). Table 3 summarizes the diagnostic characteristics and other findings in these 10 patients. They do not appear to have a unique set of systemic malformations compared to the other study patients, and more detailed evaluations will be reported elsewhere.42

Table 3.

Swedish charge study: findings associated with patients with autism spectrum disorder

Ocular findings
Ear§
Case Age (yr)/sex Autism Coloboma* Microphthalmos Heart Choanal atresia Development delay Genital Ext Hearing Other anomalies/functional problems
1 5M AD ++ + 0 0 ++ Cryptorchism micropenis + + Short stature, spine, hand, dysphagia
2 6F AD ++ + PDA, Fallot + ++ Labial hypoplasia + + Short stature, spine, dysphagia
3 7F AD ++ + ASD, VSD, PDA 0 ++ 0 + 0 Cleft palate, anal atresia, renal, spine, dental, dysphagia
4 13M AD ++ 0 PDA + ++ Cryptorchism + + Cleft palate, trachea esophageal fistula, dental, short stature, dysphagia
5 16F AD ++ + PDA, ASD 0 + 0 + 0 Cleft lip/palate, short stature, dental, dysphagia
6 4M ALC + 0 0 0 + 0 + + Short stature, dysphagia, facial nerve
7 5F ALC ++ 0 PDA, VSD, PS + ++ 0 + + Facial nerve, TE fistula, anal atresia, limb, dysphagia
8 14M ALC 0 0 0 0 0 Cryptorchism, micropenis + + Facial nerve palsy, delayed puberty, balance, short stature, spine
9 17F ALC ++ + 0 + ++ 0 + + Craniosynostosis, balance
10 18F ALC ++ 0 0 + ++ Labial, hypoplasia + + Delayed puberty, limb, dysphagia

AD, autistic disorder; ALC, autistic-like condition; ASD, atrial septal defect; EXT, external; PDA, patent ductus arteriosis; PS, pulmonary stenosis; TE, tracheoesophageal; VSD, ventricular septal defect.

*

++ = bilateral; + = unilateral; 0 = absent.

+ = present; 0 = absent. − =

++ = severe; + = mild; 0 = not present.

§

+ = malformation or functional deficit present; 0 = no malformation or functional deficit present.

Goldenhar/HFM Syndrome Study

Table 4 summarizes the systemic findings of the 20 study patients. The observed malformations and functional findings were as expected in the diagnostic characteristics, such as ear tags, microtia, lipodermoids, epibulbar dermoids, and vertebral malformations. The many associated malformations underline that this is a multisystem and not only a craniofacial syndrome.

Table 4.

Goldenhar/HFM study: Summary of most frequent malformations and functional problems (n = 20)

Problem No. (%)
Cranial nerve involvement
 Facial nerve palsy 8/20 (40)
 Neurosensory deafness 3/20 (15)
Systemic/ocular malformations
 Microsomia 15/20 (75)
 Ear tags 14/20 (70)
 Ocular dermoids 13/20 (65)
 Lipodermoid 13/20 (65)
 Epibulbar dermoids 10/20 (50)
 Gastrointestinal 11/20 (55)
 Microtia 10/20 (50)
 Vertebral anomaly 10/20 (50)
 Genitourinary 7/20 (35)
 Developmental delay 7/20 (35)
 Cardiovascular 6/20 (30)
 Fistula 4/20 (20)
Functional problems
 Hearing 14/20 (70)
 Severe developmental delay 4/19 (21)
 Autism spectrum disorder 3/18 (17)

HFM, hemifacial microsomia.

Autistic disorder was present in two cases and autistic-like condition in one case (Table 5). The associated anomalies did not seem to distinguish this subgroup from the rest of the study patients. More details of the psychiatric evaluations will be reported elsewhere.

Table 5.

Goldenhar/HFM study: Findings associated with patients with autism spectrum disorder

Case Age(yr)/sex Abnormal ear (external) Decreased hearing Dermoid Autism type Other malfunctions/symptoms
1 4/M 0 + Epibulbar lipodermoid AD Cardiovascular, gastrointestinal anomalies, mandibular hypoplasia, microphthalmos
2 16/F + + Epibulbar lipodermoid AD Limb, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, vertebral
3 6/M (Microtia, ear tags, fistula) + Epibulbar lipodermoid ALC Vertebral, facial palsy, gastrointestinal

AD, autistic disorder; ALC, autistic-like condition; OAV, oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia syndrome; symbols: + = present, 0 = normal.

Brazilian Möbius Study

Table 6 summarizes the major systemic findings of the 28 patients; findings are not separated by groups because there was minimal difference between groups 1 and 2. In the 17 patients with misoprostol exposure (group 2), 13 mothers had taken misoprostol only and four had taken misoprostol plus tea, which was a culturally popular drug felt (but not proven) to induce abortion. Three patients took misoprostol plus injection of an unidentified medication. One patient in the unexposed group (group 1) also had taken tea. A few patients in each group took other unidentifiable medications, which may have been misoprostol. Misoprostol was taken both orally and vaginally alone or together. The average number of pills ingested was 4.8 (each pill was 200 mg). In the group with misoprostol exposure, 15 patients had a history of bleeding early in pregnancy, compared to four in the unexposed group. The average duration of bleeding was approximately 9 to 10 days in both groups. Not surprisingly, bleeding was more frequent in the “attempted abortion” group than the “etiology unknown” group.

Table 6.

Brazilian möbius study: Summary of most frequent systemic malformations and functional problems* (n = 28)

Problem No. (%)
Cranial nerve involvement
 Abducens (sixth) 28/28 (100)
 Facial (seventh) 28/28 (100)
 Trigeminal (fifth) 5/28 (18)
 Hypoglossal (twelfth) 5/28 (18)
 Tearing symptoms 21/28 (75)
Systemic malformations
 Cleft lip/palate/uvula 13/28 (46)
 Micrognathia 18/28 (64)
 Limb 22/28 (79)
 Tongue (microglossia/asymmetry/function) 14/25 (56)
 Poland syndrome 1/28 (4)
Functional problems
 Mental retardation 14/23 (61)
 Hearing 8/28 (29)
 Sucking in infancy 18/28 (64)
 Dysphagia 9/28 (32)
 Autism spectrum disorder (AD, ALC) 7/23 (30)
 Seizures 12/27 (44)

AD, autistic disorder; ALC, autistic-like condition.

*

Some patients did fail appointments for some examinations, and some were too young or difficult to examine.

Inclusion criteria.

A few were suggestive of abnormal innervation of the lacrimal system, and some may have been secondary to facial nerve palsy.

Common associated anomalies were micrognathia and posterior rotated ear; there was no difference in prevalence between the two groups. Limb anomalies were present in 22 of the 28 patients in the study, with clubfoot and clinodactyly the most frequent. Abnormal tearing was present in both groups. Many patients had oral or dental malformations, including cleft palate, abnormal tongue anatomy, altered tongue tone, and poor sucking. There were only slight differences in a few malformations. A detailed analysis of this study is reported elsewhere by Ventura.33

Radiologic imaging was done on 25 of the 28 patients. The main findings were brain-stem calcification in six patients, Dandy-Walker or variant in two, arachnoid cyst in two, hydrocephalus in three, cerebral atrophy in four, and a variety of other single anomalies. There did not seem to be a significant difference between the misoprostol-exposed and the unexposed groups.

Of the 28 patients, 23 had an evaluation for ASD (Table 7). In 23 patients examined, five met the diagnostic criteria for autistic disorder according to DSM-IV and two had autistic-like condition. There was a positive history of misoprostol in three of the five with autism disorder and in one of the two with autistic-like condition. In the “etiology unknown” group, two had autistic disorder and one had autistic-like condition. Because the misoprostol cohort had more cases than the group with unknown diagnosis (17 versus 11), the percentage of ASD seems to be comparable in the two groups. Bandim and associates43 have reported the detailed psychiatric evaluation.

Table 7.

Brazilian möbius study: Findings in patients with autism spectrum disorder

Case Age (y)/sex Misoprostol exposure Strabismus primary position Facial nerve palsy Other cranial nerves Autism type Cars score* Mental retardation Other anomalies/functional problems
1 4F + Straight + 9th, 10th AD 39 + Cleft palate, micrognathia, clindactyly, calcification of brain stem
2 2F 0 ET + 9th, 10th ALC 38 + Arthrogryposis, micrognathia, club foot, clindactyly, arachnoid cyst, hydrocephaly, polymicrogyria, cerebral atrophy, cleft uvula
3 11M + ET + 9th – 12th AD 45 + Cleft palate, club foot, arthrogryposis, normal MRI
4 9F 0 XT + 9th, 10th AD 46.5 + Mitral valve prolapse, clindactyly, club foot, Dandy-Walker anomaly
5 3M 0 ET + 9th, 10th AD 47.5 + Cerebral atrophy, calcification of brain stem, cleft uvula
6 2M + ET + 9th, 10th ALC 29 + Cleft uvula, micrognathia, club foot, normal MRI
7 2F + Straight + 9th, 10th AD 38 + Clindactyly, stenosis of aqueduct of Sylvus, hydrocephalus

AD, autism disorder (DSM IV criteria); ALC, autistic-like condition; CARS, Childhood Autism Rating Scale; ET, esotropia; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; XT, exotropia; symbols: + = anomaly present, 0 = absent.

*

Median score for Möbius cases without autism, 18.4.

Per Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children.

Although the number of patients with ASD in groups with and without exposure to misoprostol is not sufficient for accurate statistical comparison of subgroups, clinodactyly, equinovarus, mitral prolapse, and involvement of cranial nerves IX and X occurred in each group. This finding provides support for a final common pathophysiology that produces the manifestations of the condition designated as Möbius sequence.

Other malformations and functional disorders also showed a fairly similar percentage in both the misoprostol and the “etiology unknown” group. Psychosocial data, economic information, and more detailed clinical reports are found in Ventura’s thesis.33

DISCUSSION

Autistic disorder is not a rare condition; estimated prevalence is about 1 to 2 individuals per 1,000. If one expands the diagnosis to include all variants of ASDs, the estimate increases to about 0.5% to 1% of the general population.4446 Even if we consider only the patients with the full autism syndrome (autistic disorder), the rates of autism in thalidomide exposure, Möbius sequence, CHARGE association, and Goldenhar syndrome are unquestionably significant.

The diagnosis of ASD is based on clinical characteristics and an established interview questionnaire with parents. The clinical behavioral characteristics include difficulties in social interaction, often with impaired verbal and nonverbal communication. Often individuals with ASD show very restrictive habits of behavior and interests and a need for routine schedules. There is often a lack in cognitive play and poor interpersonal sensitivity. Mental retardation is common, but a subset of those with ASD have normal or about average intelligence (Asperger syndrome).

There is no recognized biomarker, no consistent radiologic imaging abnormalities, and no consistent evidence of a time or location of developmental disturbance of the brain responsible for ASD. The evidence for a genetic component is high but complex, with many genes implicated as risk factors. Whereas most individuals with ASD do not have obvious systemic malformations, there is a subset of individuals with autism that have recognizable associated conditions.

This report summarizes two previous studies in the literature and three newer studies in which there is a group of individuals with the characteristic findings of ASD and also the systemic and functional findings indicating an early insult in embryonic development. This does not imply or mean to suggest that most cases of ASD result from a similar developmental disturbance, but the observations add a few more pieces of the puzzle of this complex neuropsychiatric disorder.

The research interest in this area was initiated by a somewhat serendipitous observation of four individuals with thalidomide embryopathy who demonstrated the classic behavior of severe autistic disorder. Although this Swedish study of 86 individuals with thalidomide embryopathy was prospective, it was ophthalmologically oriented and psychiatric data were not collected in an organized manner; psychiatric consultation was required to confirm autism in these four individuals.1,3,10 A search of the literature on thalidomide embryology indicated that teratogenicity occurred only in days 20 to 36± after fertilization and that the cranial nerve involvement and autism by association were in the early sensitive period of about days 20 to 25 after fertilization.4,5,7,8,10 Some literature evidence of ASD in a condition with similar findings, Möbius sequence, prompted a follow-up prospective multidisciplinary study, which revealed a surprisingly high presence of ASDs.

The three studies reported here are a natural extension of interest in syndromes/sequences with characteristic evidence of early developmental errors of ocular structures, cranial nerves, and systemic organs and more than chance presence of autism syndrome disorders. The Swedish team involved in the Möbius study decided to continue and selected CHARGE association and Goldenhar syndrome because of a few case reports of ASD in these conditions.

An “association” is a characteristic group of anomalies observed in patients seemingly more than by chance, but usually without a definite etiologic diagnosis. One example is the CHARGE association initially described by Pagon and associates.34 They proposed the acronym “CHARGE” be used to describe the characteristic findings (Coloboma, Heart, choanal Atresia, Retardation, Genital and Ear anomalies). The diagnostic criteria in this CHARGE study were the presence of four of these six characteristics, or three characteristics plus other malformations that have been frequently reported by other investigators. Subsequent reports in the CHARGE literature have suggested some modifications of the core diagnostic group.39,40,4752 Since the findings cover multiple disciplines of medicine, there is often a bias of ascertainment in any series reflecting the population evaluated, the interest of the investigators, or the sophistication of the examination of any given organ or structure. Even with that caveat that the most frequent malformations reported in this association are colobomas, choanal atresia, and heart defects, there is a strong suggestion from a recent review of cases by Källén and associates47 that microphthalmia/anophthalmia be included in the “C”; that penis hypoplasia was frequently associated; that “R” includes other brain malformations; and that growth retardation or developmental delay was common and heart defects were frequent but nonspecific. Also, cleft lip or palate occurred in 15% to 20% of CHARGE patients. Blake and associates39 estimated the prevalence of CHARGE at about 1 in 10,000. Byerly and Pauli40 brought attention to the many children with CHARGE association who have facial nerve palsies and feeding and swallowing difficulties and reported a case of CHARGE association with Möbius sequence. Blake and associates39 proposed that cranial nerve dysfunction (anosmia, facial nerve palsy, sensorineural deafness and vestibular problems, swallowing difficulties) be considered a major criterion. The involvement of cranial nerves may be a thread that exists with CHARGE association, thalidomide embryopathy, and Möbius sequence. A common pathway for CHARGE and oculoauriculovertebral spectrum has been suggested by Van Meter and Weaver.53

Whereas most cases of CHARGE are sporadic with unknown etiology, there are some familial cases and some associated with chromosomal anomalies.5456 Many features suggest defects in neural crest cell development or migration, which led some investigators to suggest that CHARGE association should be considered in the group of neurocristopathies.57 Why ASD exists in a significant number of cases is still a mystery. However, the time of initial embryonic insult is necessarily early, because ocular colobomas, a significant characteristic, are caused by failure of closure of the embryonic fetal fissure by about the sixth week, although according to the thalidomide study, an earlier insult (25 to 27 days ±) can result in an ocular coloboma.

Hemifacial microsomia is a descriptive term used by Gorlin58,59 and others to characterize a group of patients who manifest a spectrum of malformations involving the ear, mandible, mouth, eye, and, often, the cervical spine. The findings occur unilaterally in most, but not all, patients. It is usually sporadic, but family occurrences, especially with only a few anomalies, have been reported. Goldenhar syndrome has been proposed to represent a variant of this entity.59 Initially, Goldenhar60 described a number of patients with a combination of epibulbar dermoids, lipodermoids, and preauricular skin tags and fistula. Later, upper lid coloboma and facial and vertebral anomalies became appreciated as part of the syndrome. Duane syndrome has been reported in a number of patients with Goldenhar syndrome but is not a common characteristic. Although no consistent evidence of pathophysiology or etiology is accepted, disruption of embryonic vasculature has been suggested as one mechanism to explain the observed findings. The time of embryonic insult is more difficult to pinpoint in Möbius sequence or Goldenhar syndrome than it is in thalidomide embryopathy, but best estimates are early in pregnancy, probably around 4 to 6 weeks of development. Lam61 proposed that ectodermal nondisjunction involving the otic placode could produce the malformations seen in Goldenhar syndrome. If correct, this would explain the multisystem findings and also place the time early in the fourth week. Another suggestion is that Goldenhar syndrome can be a result of “reproductive wastage” in high-risk conceptions, based on one case of possible monozygotic twins conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.62 There were a few in vitro fertilization cases in our series also. These observations support the concept of a nonspecific early embryonic event resulting in a malformation complex. If correct, this makes the association with ASD even more intriguing. Although the number of cases of autistic disorder or autistic-like condition in our Goldenhar group (3 in 18) was not as high as in the Möbius studies, it certainly is more than chance, with the estimated prevalence of autism being 1 to 2 per 1,000.

In the early 1990s there were a number of case reports in the Brazilian literature of infants born with malformations involving limbs, cranial nerves, and other anomalies following self-induced but failed abortions.2328 The abortifacient drug used was misoprostol, a prostaglandin type E analogue. In some of these reports, the children exhibited the typical findings of Möbius syndrome with and without limb anomalies.2932

Misoprostol as a drug for self-induced abortions has gained much popularity in South America, especially Brazil, where abortions are not legal except in a few situations.27,63 It was estimated to be used in more than 50% of attempted abortions in some areas of Brazil. Misoprostol was cheap and readily available because of its accepted use in medical conditions such as gastric ulcers and arthritis.64,65 Medically induced abortions have advantages over clandestine abortion from unlicensed “professionals.” They avoid risk of anesthesia and surgical complications in unclean environments and, perhaps most important, can be done in privacy. Misoprostol is also utilized for planned abortions, conducted by medical professionals in many countries, but almost always combined with another drug, such as mifepristone.66,67 However, misoprostol alone is a poor abortifacient drug, and many pregnancies continue to term. It appears to be a fairly weak teratogen, since the reported percentage of malformation is low, but because of its tremendous popularity as an abortifacient drug for self-induced abortions, even low-incidence complications such as Möbius sequence occurred in sizable numbers.

The Swedish study of Möbius, along with reports in the Brazilian literature of the association of Möbius sequence and misoprostol, prompted a prospective multidisciplinary study in Brazil by Ventura and associates.33 It was designed to be descriptive of malformations and functional disorders in all study patients and also to compare the findings of those whose mothers took misoprostol early in pregnancy with the findings of those with no exposure history. Additionally, there was interest to see if ASD occurred in some patients.

The Brazil study is the pièce de résistance with new, key pieces to the puzzle of autism, reaffirming observations in the other four studies of ASD associated with cranial nerve, ophthalmic, and craniofacial malformations. In addition to thalidomide, it introduced a second teratogen, misoprostol, associated with ASD. It supports the conclusions of the Swedish Möbius study that ASD has a significant association with Möbius sequence, but in another ethnic group with another research team.18 And perhaps the most exciting observation in the South America study was that ASD occurred in individuals with and without known exposure to misoprostol during their mother’s pregnancy.

Another very interesting finding is the marked increase in cases of Möbius sequence in some areas of South America after misoprostol became a commonly used abortifacient drug. The fact that Ventura33 and her multidisciplinary team were able to recruit 28 cases of Möbius sequence in 6 months from only one surrounding region is remarkable. It is probably explained by the 17 cases that had known misoprostol exposure.

A number of questions come to mind when looking at these three present studies and the previous thalidomide and Swedish Möbius study. The first might be whether the cases with ASD in these conditions were chance occurrences or represented some study bias. To answer this concern, the prevalence of autism must be analyzed along with the methodology of all studies. In the thalidomide study, the rate of ASD was the lowest, with four of 86 proven by formal neuropsychiatric examinations to have the full-blown autistic disorder.2 Since only five individuals with severe neuropsychiatric behavior noted by the pediatric ophthalmologists doing the study were referred for psychiatric evaluation, these numbers could easily be an underestimation of what might be present if the study would have included neuropsychiatric behavior data in all study patients. Even so, this rate of 46 per 1,000 is significant. The Swedish Möbius study in the literature was more dramatic, reporting six of 23 study patients showing the full autistic disorder and one with autistic-like condition (a prevalence of 260 in 1,000). The Brazilian Möbius/misoprostol study had five of 23 patients meet the criteria for the full autistic disorder and two for autistic-like condition. The Swedish CHARGE association indicated that in the individuals old enough to be evaluated, five had autistic disorder and five autistic-like condition. In the 18 patients able to be tested in the Goldenhar/HFM study, two had autistic disorder and one had autistic-like condition. The diagnosis in all studies was made by experienced child psychiatrists utilizing more than one of the accepted diagnostic tools of the DSM-III-R and DSM-IV criteria and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, tenth revision (ICD-10) criteria as operationalized in the ADI-R, CARS, and ABC. The recruitment was based on the diagnostic characteristics of the condition and not autism, so there seems little bias of ascertainment.

Why is the coexistence of ASD and systemic conditions not more widespread in a large body of autism literature? The thalidomide observation may be explained by the fact that most of the literature involved infants or young children in whom the extensive limb and other systemic anomalies were more pertinent issues for the individual. There were a few multidiscipline studies of adults, but although there were psychological symptoms, the diagnosis of autism was not made.

Autism coexisting in individuals with Möbius sequence, CHARGE association, and Goldenhar syndrome is reported in the literature, but not in the degree noted in these four studies. However, after attention had been drawn to the possibility of this association, we have been informed of a number of unreported cases, especially with Möbius sequence. For example, there is a Möbius support group, and requests have been made to address the subject of autism at their meeting because of a number of parents with concerns about the behavior of their children.

Another question might be, Is there a common thread or pathway that ties the patients with Möbius sequence, CHARGE association, and Goldenhar syndrome together? The most common characteristic of the anomalies associated with autism in these studies is that they result from an early adverse embryonic event. The literature can be confusing and must be read carefully when it relates to embryonic timing issues. “Gestational age,” used by obstetricians and many others, is calculated from the last menstrual period. A gestational age of 1 month of an embryo is actually 2 weeks postconception/fertilization. These 2 weeks are certainly not trivial when looking at early embryonic events. The final studies described events by the actual age of development of the fetus. The most reliable timing is developmental insult, as in the thalidomide data, in which the four individuals with autism were exposed to thalidomide 20 to 25 days postfertilization because of their associated malformations (Duane syndrome, facial nerve palsy, ear anomalies). The next evidence of embryonic timing is from the misoprostol group. Although less precise, it appears that exposure was at 4 to 6 weeks (6 to 8 weeks from the last menstrual cycle). In Möbius patients with unknown etiology, there is no definite information except that it seems consistent with the misoprostol group to be early (eg, 4 to 6 weeks). There are cases reported with later adverse pregnancy events associated with Möbius sequence, so one has to be careful not to make absolute conclusions. The least established timing is in the CHARGE group, although we know the ocular embryonic fissure is closed in around the sixth week of embryogenesis, so the insult must be some time before that date. From the thalidomide timetable it could be as early as the late fourth week. The Goldenhar group seems to be at 4 to 6 weeks of embryogenesis, based on associated anomalies.

Although the coexistence of ASD with these reported conditions is quite convincing, the proposed pathophysiology mechanisms are not clear. Comprehensive reviews of possible pathophysiology in thalidomide have not resolved the issue. Stephens and associates68 noted that although there were 2,000 papers published in the last 40 years concerning thalidomide teratogenicity, the mechanism of action still remains elusive.

In the sporadic cases of Möbius sequence, there is some agreement in the literature as to possible causal mechanisms. A popular theory is that it belongs in a group of “disruption syndromes,” although there is disagreement as to the causes of the embryonic disruption. The most frequently stated cause is that of a vascular disruption in the early embryonic period. Some investigators refer to it as the “subclavian disruption syndrome.”69,70 They postulate a primary vascular disruption causing hypoxia, ischemia,7173 edema, and hemorrhage, followed by secondary events that may affect other organs. The timing extent of this hypoxic event will determine the ultimate malformations based on the sensitive tissues at the time of the hypoxia.

There are clinical case reports that support the vascular disruption concept. For example, malformations suggestive of Möbius sequence have been reported in fetuses exposed to cocaine, presumably causing vasoconstriction of the uterine vessels.74,75 Also, chorionic villi sampling has been suggested as an occasional cause of limb anomalies and of Möbius sequence, although there are reports both supporting and refuting this association.7679 Möbius cases have been associated with hypovolemia in a splenic bleed during pregnancy and inadvertent exposure to ergotamine with apparent uterine constriction.8082 A few children with Möbius sequence have a history of polyhydramnios in pregnancy.72 In the Swedish Möbius study and other studies, there was an apparent increase of bleeding in early pregnancy reported without known precipitating causes, and also one case with a history of chorionic villi sampling procedure. Courtens and associates83 reported a case associated with a history of exposure to benzodiazepines. The apparent common characteristic of all these cases in the literature is an early adverse pregnancy event resulting in a possible short period of hypoxia brought on by disturbance in the blood supply from uterine constriction. This line of reasoning received support by the association of misoprostol taken early in pregnancy in failed abortion attempts resulting in infants with characteristic findings of Möbius sequence.

Another type of disruption was proposed by Bamforth,84 who described a process termed “organizational disruption” (blastogenic disruption) as an explanation for some of the observed malformations, suggesting that it is a better explanation for some phenotypes. He proposes that there are a group of organizational molecules (morphogenes), highly conserved and determined by chromosomes in a sequential manner, that are important in the early stage of organization. This organization is imposed on embryonic cells by activation determined by homebox genes. If something interferes with the organization of these morphogenes, higher or lower concentrations may cause activation of genes at inappropriate times, which could result in malformation of organs or histologic development. This theory is perhaps compatible with the observations that some of the HOX gene defects in the animal models result in the same brain-stem malformations that are sometimes associated with autism in humans.

How do we get from early-onset insult that seems to affect multiple brain-stem structures to autism disorders that involve higher centers not yet formed? Is there a group of unidentified cells that are even at this time programmed for a higher brain center, which are damaged, or is there an interruption in a series of connections ultimately crucial for higher centers to develop correctly? These are key questions, but we may only be able to speculate about answers at this time on some evidence from other studies of the associated conditions or malformations.

Rodier and associates85 noted almost complete absence of facial nuclei and shortening of brain stem in a patient with autism. In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies by Hashimoto and associates86 and Cody and associates,14 the MRI findings in individuals with autism are noted. Radiologic abnormalities, albeit not consistent or conclusive, have also been reported in Möbius syndrome. Some include abnormalities of the brain stem.8789 There are a number of literature reports of central hypoventilation, brain-stem changes, and, in some, Möbius sequence.90,91 Marques-Dias and associates92 reported neuropathologic findings in three cases of Möbius syndrome related to misoprostol, finding calcification of the brain stem involving some of the cranial nerve nuclei. They felt this was due to vascular disruption. In the Brazilian Möbius study, there was a variety of MRI abnormalities, the most common being brain-stem calcification.

Aberrant innervation does not occur frequently in nature, and yet examples of aberrant innervation of brainstem structures appear throughout these studies; the most striking is in thalidomide embryopathy with Duane syndrome and paradoxical lacrimation. We note aberrant lacrimation in patients with Möbius sequence. Abnormal tearing symptoms were also present in many in the Brazilian study, in both the misoprostol related and “etiology unknown” groups. Amaya and associates93 noted excessive lacrimation in 11 of 18 cases in a series of Möbius cases, with three patients also manifesting tearing when eating. It is interesting that early in embryogenesis the sixth and seventh cranial nerve nuclei and lacrimal nuclei are in close proximity. Destruction or failure of development of these structures might result in aberrant repair processes with inappropriate innervation. There is also a literature report of another type of paradoxical innervation, Marcus Gunn jaw winking, with CHARGE association.94 Local vulnerability and critical time may be the necessary factors for these neurologic mismatches to occur.

In conclusion, although autism may result from a variety of mechanisms and causes, evidence from the thalidomide, Möbius, CHARGE, and Goldenhar studies seems to establish quite firmly that early insults in embryogenesis, often involving brain-stem structures, may be associated with ASD.

DISCUSSION

Dr Gerhard W. Cibis

The lead authors of this presentation, Drs Miller and Strömland, were the first to report the association of autism in 5 percent of Thalidomide victims.1 Most importantly, they were able to pinpoint the timing of toxicity to days 20–24 after conception based on their autism patients having external ear anomalies but no involvement of the limbs, which occurs days 25–35. In this study, the relationship of autism with ophthalmic disorders involving cranial nerves, specifically CHARGE syndrome, MOEBEUS sequence GOLDENHAR syndrome and MISOPROSTOL exposure, are added. The Brazilian cases show autism in a racially different population than the more homogenous Swedish population.

The cause of autism is unknown.2 Very few neurons form as early as the fourth week of gestation; most that do are cranial. The brainstem in autism is shorter than normal. The facial nucleus and trapezoid body are closer to the hypoglossal nucleus and inferior olive. The superior olive is missing and the facial nucleus is smaller than normal. Such changes can occur only in early gestation. Behaviors disturbed in autism such as language and planning and interpretation of social cues are of course not brainstem but higher brain functions of the cerebral cortex and hippocampus.

This study links autism to cranial nerve disruption from early embryologic events before the higher regions of the brain are even formed. As the authors point out, presumably the evolution of unidentified cells into higher brain structures is somehow damaged or altered. It need not be the cells themselves directly that are damaged but the evolutionarily highly conserved homeobox control genes that determine embryogenesis. Rodier2 has found variants in HOXA1 allele to be twice as common in autism patients as in their non-autistic family members. HOXA1 is thought to be only one of many genes involved in the spectrum of autism disorders. Patients with autism have a reduction in the number of neurons in the cerebellum that controls muscle movement. Parts of the cerebellum are activated during certain tasks requiring high-level cognitive processing. Some symptoms common in autism, such as lack of facial expression, hypersensitivity to touch, sound and sleep disturbances, could be associated with the more primitive brain stem functions. Our understanding of the neurologic sources of autism is still poor.

Fetal alcohol mouse model confirms a similar disruption of later brain and eye formation. In ETOH patients, the electroretinogram shows abnormalities reflecting abnormal retinal circuitry.3 An ERG study of autism patients might be of interest in that regard.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Miller MT, Strömland K. Ocular motility in thalidomide embryopathy. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1991;28:47–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rodier PM. The early origins of autism. Sci Am. 2000;282:56–63. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0200-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hug TE, Fitzgerald KM, Cibis GW. Clinical and electroretinographic findings in fetal alcohol syndrome. J AAPOS. 2000;4:200–204. doi: 10.1067/mpa.2000.105278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Dr Irene H. Ludwig

A number of years ago, I reported on a group of patients who were somewhat similar: They had congenital, central hypoventilation syndrome, which is a brain stem disorder affecting respiratory control, and they also had similar eye findings to your thalidomide groups. In the studies of those families, the pulmonologists were never able to identify a genetic cause. But, they did find geographic clustering, suggesting that there may be an environmental influence. Have you looked for environmental teratogens in your groups? The group of hypoventilation syndrome patients also had very high incidence of autism and ADD-type disorders.

Dr John T. Flynn

Marilyn Miller is like Archibald Garad, the great English teratologist, who by minute observation of these abnormalities began the whole study of teratology in the 19th century. Marilyn has taken us on a tour of the brain stem and the malformations that occur by exposure to different kinds of teratogens. I think the central thread of your studies is similar to a generalization that John Opitz, the American teratologist, made: the organism reacts to a whole series of insults in very stereotyped ways. The insults can be many, but it is the time when the insults are delivered that causes these different anomalies.

Dr Marilyn T. Miller

Dr Ludwig brings up something interesting. A number of the Möbius patients also have difficulty with ventilation and there’s no question there is a spectrum of problems that are somehow related to the time of insult. We probably did not look sufficiently for environmental factors; we queried extensively the pregnancy histories in both the Swedish study and the Brazilian study. In the Swedish study, there did not seem to be any factors except that there were more histories of bleeding early in pregnancy. The Brazilian study was also not fruitful in the pregnancy history, except in that case we were dealing with the misoprostol exposure, so obviously these women had histories of bleeding because they attempted abortions. Most of them had about 12 or 24 hours of uterine contractions and some bleeding, but they didn’t abort and they went on to term.

Dr Flynn, that is my favorite quote from Opitz. There’s no question that we’re dealing with time sensitivity and structures that are developing. There is a lot of speculation in the literature what these reasons are, but the brain stem structures seem to be very sensitive to hypoxia at that time. That is also the time that the embryo is folding, and some people have speculated that makes it even more sensitive. It is probably a matter of the sensitivity of the area and the timing. Whether autism is related to other structures or to the brainstem is not known. In the Brazilian study, we performed MRIs and CTs on 25 of the 28 with 15 demonstrating abnormalities, mostly with signs of necrosis or calcification, but also a variety of nonspecific findings too.

Footnotes

Supported in part by grant U19HD/DC35466, a Collaborative Program of Excellence in Autism; core grant EY 1792 from the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; an unrestricted research grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, New York; and the Lions of Illinois Foundation, Maywood, Illinois (Dr Miller). Also supported in part by the Göteborg Medical Society, Göteborg, Sweden (Dr Strömland) and the Altino Ventura Foundation, Recife, Brazil (Dr Ventura).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Miller MT. Thalidomide embryopathy: a model for the study of congenital incomitant horizontal strabismus. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1991;89:623–674. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miller MT, Strömland K. Ocular motility in thalidomide embryopathy. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1991;28:47–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Strömland K, Miller M. Thalidomide embryopathy: revisited 27 years later. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1993;71:238–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1993.tb04997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lenz W, Knapp K. Die Thalidomid-embryopathie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1962;87:1232–1242. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1111892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Papst W. Thalidomid und kongenitale Anomalien der Augen. Ber Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges. 1964;65:209–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Papst WE, Esslen E. Symptomatology and therapy in ocular motor disturbance. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964;58:275–291. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(64)91577-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nowack E. Die sensible Phase bei der Thalidomid-embryopathie. Humangenetik. 1965;1:516–536. doi: 10.1007/BF00338341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kida M, ed. Thalidomide Embryopathy in Japan. Tokyo: Kodansha Ltd; 1987.
  • 9.Arimoto Y. Ophthalmology in thalidomide embryopathy. In: Kida M, ed. Thalidomide Embryopathy in Japan. Tokyo: Kodansha Ltd; 1987:143–153.
  • 10.Strömland K, Nordin V, Miller M, et al. Autism in thalidomide embryopathy: a population study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994;36:351–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1994.tb11856.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rodier PM. 2003 Warkany Lecture, Autism as a birth defect. Birth Defects Res Clin Mol Teratol. 2004;70:1–6. doi: 10.1002/bdra.10152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rodier PM. The early origins of autism. Sci Am. 2000;282:56–63. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0200-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gillberg C, Coleman M. Autism and medical disorders: a review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38:191–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cody H, Pelphrey K, Piven J. Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging of autism. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2002;20:421–438. doi: 10.1016/s0736-5748(02)00053-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gillberg C, Steffenburg S. Autistic behaviour in Moebius syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 1989;79:314–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1989.tb11076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ornitz EM, Guthrie D, Farley AH. The early development of autistic children. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1977;7:207–229. doi: 10.1007/BF01538999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gillberg C, Winnergärd I. Childhood psychosis in a case of Moebius syndrome. Neuropaediatrics. 1984;15:147–149. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1052359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Strömland K, Sjöogreen L, Miller M, et al. Möbius sequence—a Swedish multidiscipline study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2002;6:35–45. doi: 10.1053/ejpn.2001.0540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Johansson M, Wentz E, Fernell E, et al. Autistic spectrum disorders in Möbius sequence: a comprehensive study of 25 individuals. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:338–345. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201000627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Landgren M, Gillberg C, Strömland K. Goldenhar syndrome and autistic behaviour. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992;34:999–1005. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1992.tb11405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fernell E, Olsson VA, Karlgren-Leitner C, et al. Autistic disorders in children with CHARGE association. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999;4:270–272. doi: 10.1017/s0012162299000572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brodsky MC, Barber LG, Lam BL, et al. Neuro-ophthalmologic findings in Asperger disorder. J Neuroophthalmol. 1996;16:185–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fonseca W, Alencar AJC, Mota FSB, et al. Misoprostol and congenital malformations. Lancet. 1991;338:56. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90046-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Costa SH, Vessey MP. Misoprostol and illegal abortion in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Lancet. 1993;341:1258–1261. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91156-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Genest DR, Di Salvo D, Rosenblatt MJ, et al. Terminal transverse limb defects with tethering and omphalocele in a 17-week fetus following first trimester misoprostol exposure. Clin Dysmorphol. 1999;8:53–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coêlho HLL, Misago C, Fronseca WVC. Selling abortifacients over the counter in pharmacies in Fortaleza, Brazil. Lancet. 1991;338:247. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90379-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Coêlho HLL, Teixeira AC, Santos AP, et al. Misoprostol and illegal abortion in Fortaleza, Brazil. Lancet. 1993;341:1261–1263. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91157-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Coêlho KEFA, Sarmento MF, Veiga CM, et al. Misoprostol embryotoxicity: clinical evaluations of fifteen patients with arthrogryposis. Am J Med Genet. 2000;95:297–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gonzalez CH, Vargas FR, Perez AB, et al. Limb deficiency with or without Möbius sequence in seven Brazilian children associated with misoprostol use in the first trimester of pregnancy. Am J Med Genet. 1993;47:59–64. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320470113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gonzalez CH, Marques-Dias MJ, Kim CA, et al. Congenital abnormalities in Brazilian children associated with misoprostol misuse in first trimester of pregnancy. Lancet. 1998;351:1624–1627. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)12363-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Blanchard K, Winikoff B, Ellertson C. Use of misoprostol during pregnancy and Möbius’ syndrome in infants [comment] New Engl J Med. 1998;339:1553–1554. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811193392114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Marques-Dias MJ. Fisipathogenia da syndrome de Mobius e da artrogripose decorrentes da exposicao in utero ao misoprostol [Tese]. Sao Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; 1999.
  • 33.Ventura LMVO. Seqüência de Möbius: estudo comparative das anomalias e distúrbios funcianais em crianças com ou sem uso de misoprostol, durante e gestação [Tese]. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 2001.
  • 34.Pagon RA, Graham JM, Jr, Zonana J, et al. Coloboma, congenital heart disease and choanal atresia with multiple anomalies: CHARGE association. J Pediatr. 1981;99:223–227. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(81)80454-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Associaiton; 1994.
  • 36.Schopler E, Reichler RJ, Renner BR. The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1988.
  • 37.Krug DA, Arick J, Almond P. Behaviour checklist for identifying severely handicapped individuals with high levels of autistic behaviour. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1980;21:221–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1980.tb01797.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A. Autism diagnostic interview—revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994;24:659–685. doi: 10.1007/BF02172145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Blake KD, Davenport SL, Hall BD, et al. CHARGE association: an update and review for the primary pediatrician [review] Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1998;37:159–173. doi: 10.1177/000992289803700302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Byerly KA, Pauli RM. Cranial nerve abnormalities in CHARGE association. Am J Med Genet. 1993;45:751–757. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320450617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lacombe D. Facial palsy and cranial nerve abnormalities in CHARGE association [comment letter] Am J Med Genet. 1994;49:351–353. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320490324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Strömland K, Sjögreen L, Johansson M, et al. CHARGE association in Sweden—malformations, functional deficits and developmental timing implications. Am J Med Genet 2004. In press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 43.Bandim JM, Ventura LO, Miller MT, et al. Autism and Möbius sequence: an exploratory study of children in northeastern Brazil. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2003;61:181–185. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2003000200004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gillberg C, Wing L. Autism: not an extremely rare disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999;99:399–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1999.tb00984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fombone E. Prevalence of childhood disintegrative disorder. Autism. 2002;6:149–157. doi: 10.1177/1362361302006002002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wing L, Potter D. The epidemiology of autistic spectrum disorders. Is the prevalence rising? Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8:151–161. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Källén K, Robert E, Mastroiacovo P, et al. CHARGE association in newborns: a registry-based study. Teratology. 1999;60:334–343. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199912)60:6<334::AID-TERA5>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Brock KE, Mathiason MA, Rooney BL, et al. Quantitative analysis of limb anomalies in CHARGE syndrome: correlation with diagnosis and characteristic CHARGE anomalies. Am J Med Genet. 2003;123A:111–121. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Russell-Eggitt HI, Blake K, Taylor D, et al. The eye in the CHARGE association. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:421–426. doi: 10.1136/bjo.74.7.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Davenport SL, Hefner MA, Mitchell JA. The spectrum of clinical features in CHARGE syndrome. Clin Genet. 1986;29:298–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1986.tb01258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Oley CA, Baraitser M, Grant DB. A reappraisal of the CHARGE association. J Med Genet. 1988;25:147–156. doi: 10.1136/jmg.25.3.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chestler RJ, France TD. Ocular findings in CHARGE syndrome: six case reports and a review. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:1613–1619. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)32968-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Van Meter TD, Weaver DD. Oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum and the CHARGE association: clinical evidence for a common pathogenetic mechanism. Clin Dysmorphol. 1996;5:187–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wieczorek D, Bolt J, Schwechheimer K, et al. A patient with interstitial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 3 (pterÆp21. 2::p12Æqter) and a CHARGE-like phenotype. Am J Med Genet. 1997;69:413–417. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19970414)69:4<413::aid-ajmg15>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Devriendt K, Swillen A, Fryns JP. Deletion in chromosome region 22q11 in a child with CHARGE association. Clin Genet. 1998;53:408–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1998.tb02755.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sanlaville D, Romana SP, Lapierre JM, et al. A CGH study of 27 patients with CHARGE association. Clin Genet. 2002;61:135–138. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2002.610208.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Siebert JR, Graham JM, Jr, MacDonald C. Pathologic features of the CHARGE association: support for involvement of the neural crest. Teratology. 1985;31:331–336. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420310303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gorlin RJ, Jue KI, Jacobson U, et al. Oculoauriculo-vertebral syndrome. J Pediatr. 1963;63:991–999. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(63)80233-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM, Levin LS. Syndromes of the Head and Neck. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990:641–649, 666–672.
  • 60.Goldenhar M. Associations de malformaties l’oeil et de l’oreille en particulier le syndrome: dermoide epibulbaire, appendices auriculaires, fistula auri congenita et ses relations avec la dysostose mandibule-faciale. J Genet Hum. 1952;1:243–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lam C. A theory on the embryogenesis of oculo-auricular-vertebral (Goldenhar) syndrome. J Craniofacial Surg. 2000;11:547–552. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200011060-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jongbloet PH. Goldenhar syndrome and overlapping dysplasias, in vitro fertilization and ovopathy. J Med Genet. 1987;24:616–620. doi: 10.1136/jmg.24.10.616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Blanchard K, Winikoff B, Ellertson C. Use of misoprostol during pregnancy and Mobius’ syndrome in infants. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1553–1554. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811193392114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Grazioli I, Avossa M, Bogliolo A, et al. Multicenter study of the safety/efficacy of misoprostol in the prevention and treatment of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal lesions. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1993;11:289–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Raskin JB, White RH, Jaszewski R, et al. Misoprostol and ranitidine in the prevention of NSAID-induced ulcers: a prospective, double-blind, multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:223–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Norman JE, Thong KJ, Baird DT. Uterine contractility and induction of abortion in early pregnancy by misoprostol and mifepristone. Lancet. 1991;338:1233–1236. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92102-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Spitz IM, Bardin CW, Benton L, et al. Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1241–1247. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804303381801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Stephens TD, Bunde CJ, Fillmore BJ. Mechanism of action in thalidomide teratogenesis. Biochem Pharm. 2000;59:1489–1499. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00388-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bavinck JN, Weaver DD. Subclavian artery supply disruption sequence: hypothesis of a vascular etiology for Poland, Klippel-Feil, and Möbius anomalies. Am J Med Genet. 1986;23:903–918. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320230405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Issaivanan M, Virdi VS, Parmar VR. Subclavian artery supply disruption sequence-Klippel-Feil and Mobius anomalies. Indian J Pediatr. 2002;69:441–442. doi: 10.1007/BF02722639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Shepard TH. Editorial reply to “Comments on ‘Moebius syndrome: animal model-human correlations and evidence for a brainstem vascular etiology’”: case observation vs epidemiology studies. Teratology. 1991;43:559–560. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420430609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.St Charles S, DiMario FJ, Jr, Grunnet ML. Möbius sequence: further in vivo support for the subclavian artery supply disruption sequence. Am J Med Genet. 1993;47:289–293. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320470230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Matsui A, Nakagawa M, Okuno M. Association of atrial septal defect with Poland-Moebius syndrome: vascular disruption can be a common etiologic factor. Angiology. 1997;48:269–271. doi: 10.1177/000331979704800311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hoyme HE, Jones KL, Dixon SD, et al. Prenatal cocaine exposure and fetal vascular disruption. Pediatrics. 1990;85:743–747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kankirawatana P, Tennison MB, D’Cruz O, et al. Möbius syndrome in infant exposed to cocaine in utero. Pediatr Neurol. 1993;9:71–72. doi: 10.1016/0887-8994(93)90016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Firth HV, Boyd PA, Chamberlain P, et al. Severe limb abnormalities after chorion villus sampling at 56–66 days’ gestation. Lancet. 1991;337:762–763. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91374-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Burton BK, Schulz CJ, Burd LI. Spectrum of limb disruption defects associated with chorionic villus sampling. Pediatrics. 1993;91:989–993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Froster UG, Jackson L. Limb defects and chorionic villus sampling: results from an international registry, 1992–94. Lancet. 1996;347:489–494. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91136-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Holmes LB. Teratogen-induced limb defects. Am J Med Genet. 2002;112:297–303. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lipson AH, Gillerot Y, Tannenberg AE, et al. Two cases of maternal antenatal splenic rupture and hypotension associated with Moebius syndrome and cerebral palsy in offspring: further evidence for in utero placental vascular aetiology for the Moebius syndrome and some cases of cerebral palsy. Eur J Pediatr. 1996;55:800–804. doi: 10.1007/BF02002911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hughes HE, Goldstein DA. Birth defects following maternal exposure of ergotamine, beta-blockers and caffeine. J Med Genet. 1988;25:396–399. doi: 10.1136/jmg.25.6.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Verlos A, Emonts P, Dubois M, et al. Paraplegia and arthrogryposis multiplex of the lower extremities after intrauterine exposure to ergotamine. J Med Genet. 1990;27:213–214. doi: 10.1136/jmg.27.3.213-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Courtens W, Vamos E, Hainaut M, et al. Moebius syndrome in an infant exposed in utero to benzodiazepines. J Pediatr. 1992;121:833–834. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81934-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Bamforth JS. Disruption sequences: embryonic vascular accident or blastogenic disruption sequence? Am J Med Genet. 1993;47:284–288. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320470229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rodier PM, Ingram JL, Tisdale B, et al. Embryological origin for autism: developmental anomalies of the cranial nerve motor nuclei. J Comp Neurol. 1996;370:247–261. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960624)370:2<247::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hashimoto T, Tayama M, Murakawa K, et al. Development of the brainstem and cerebellum in autistic patients. J Autism Dev Disord. 1995;25:1–18. doi: 10.1007/BF02178163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Thakkar N, O’Neill W, Duvally J, et al. Möbius syndrome due to brain stem tegmental necrosis. Arch Neurol. 1977;34:124–126. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1977.00500140078018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lengyel D, Zaunbauer W, Keller E, et al. Mobius syndrome: MRI findings in three cases. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2000;37:305–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Pedraza S, Gamez J, Rovira A, et al. MRI findings in Möbius syndrome: correlation with clinical features. Neurology. 2000;55:1058–1060. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.7.1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Cohen SR, Thompson JW. Variants of Mobius’ syndrome and central neurologic impairment. Lindeman procedure in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1987;96:93–100. doi: 10.1177/000348948709600122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Igarashi M, Rose DF, Storgion SA. Moebius syndrome and central respiratory dysfunction. Pediatr Neurol. 1997;16:237–240. doi: 10.1016/s0887-8994(97)00012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Marques-Dias MJ, Gonzalez CH, Rosemberg S. Mobius sequence in children exposed in utero to misoprostol: neuropathological study of three cases. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003;67:1002–1007. doi: 10.1002/bdra.10144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Amaya LG, Walker J, Taylor D. Möbius syndrome. A study and report of 18 cases. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 1990;5:119–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Weaver RG, Jr, Seaton AD, Jewett T. Bilateral Marcus Gunn (jaw winking) phenomenon occurring with CHARGE association. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1997;34:308–309. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19970901-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society are provided here courtesy of American Ophthalmological Society

RESOURCES