Abstract
Adaptability is an important aspect of human behavior that determines the successful accomplishment of a task. The objective to study was to compare the patterns of Adaptive Behavior (AB) in older adults of both sexes according to age range and schooling. A cross-sectional descriptive (comparative) study was designed on 65 older adults (30 males and 35 females) of the Maule region (Chile). The sample was non-probabilistic. The age range was 70 to 85 years. Weight and height were evaluated and Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated. A scale of self-perception of AB in older adults was applied. BMI in males was 29.5±3.9kg/m2 and in females was 28.4±5.0kg/m2. The AB values in males were 150.0±13.0 points and in females 57.0±15.0 points (p<0.05). The values of AB by schooling were: In males: High School Education 142.3±11.5 points and Secondary Education 151.6±14.6 points (p <0.05). In females: High School 149.6±15.2 points and Secondary Education 159.8±15.1 points (p <0.05). This study found that females performed better in AB, specifically in self-care, home life, self-direction, and socialization than their male counterparts; in addition, older adults of both sexes with higher education had better scores in AB than those with secondary education.
Key Words: adaptive behavior, educational level, older adults, Chile
Adaptive Behavior (AB) is defined as the set of conceptual, social, and practical skills that have been learned and performed by people throughout their daily lives.1 Understanding the construct of adaptive behavior in older adults has to do with communication, safety, leisure, use of recreational spaces, self-care, self-direction, home life, functional skills, socialization, health, and ability to function.2
These skills allow us to meet social expectations according to our age group.3 Adaptability is an important aspect of human behavior, which often determines who will, and who will not, successfully perform a given task.4
In fact, old age is characterized by the loss of physical and cognitive functions, deterioration of quality of life, and increased prevalence of chronic and metabolic diseases,5 among others, which affect effective adaptation as human beings move towards senescence.
As adults age, they respond more slowly to simple stimuli and take longer to learn new behaviors, which potentially decreases their adaptive capacity.4
Several studies have reported that older adults underestimate their health status, so they are more likely to show adaptive behavior related to reductions in mobility,6 lifestyle deterioration, frailty, prevalence of sedentary lifestyle, musculoskeletal disorders, are some of the factors that predominate during old age and cause serious consequences for overall health and well-being.6,7
These factors lead older adults to high dependency rates and the transformation of health and social care to adapt to new behaviors during old age,8 so studying AB according to age and schooling in older adults in a region of Chile is highly relevant.
In fact, some previous studies have reported that a higher level of education, including social and material resources, reflect better favorable experiences across the lifespan,9,10 even, those with low educational and socioeconomic status experience poorer psychosocial functioning than their highly educated counterparts.11
Therefore, this study aimed to compare patterns of AB in older adults of both sexes according to age range and schooling.
Materials and Methods
Type of study and sample
A descriptive (comparative) study was designed on 65 older adults (30 males and 35 females) from the Maule region (Chile). The sample was non-probabilistic (accidental). The age range was 70 to 85 years.
All volunteers participated in a physical activity project organized by the municipality of Talca, Maule region (Chile) during the year 2023. All those who authorized informed consent and those who were self-sufficient and did not need assistance to reach the municipality’s program were included in the study. Adults who were not in the established age range and those who had difficulty in moving, listening, reading, and moving alone were excluded. The study conducted was approved by the ethics committee of the Universidad Católica del Maule (Chile) (UCM 105-2022).
Techniques and procedures
Data collection was carried out in the facilities of the National Sports Institute IND (closed environment). Data collection was organized in two stages: The anthropometric evaluation and the application of the AB survey.
Anthropometric measurements were collected according to the recommendations of the International Society for the Advancement of Kineanthropometry,12 Body weight was assessed using a digital scale (SECA, BMI 804, Hamburg, Germany) with an accuracy of 0.1 kg. Height was measured according to the Frankfurt plane using a portable stadiometer (Seca 216, Gmbh and Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany) with an accuracy of 0.1 mm. Body Mass Index BMI was calculated using the formula: [BMI = weight (kg)/height (m) 2].
AB was assessed using the survey technique. The instrument used was the AB Self-Perception Scale for Chilean females aged 60 to 88 years proposed by Gómez-Campos et al.8 The scale presented some sociodemographic variables such as age, sex, occupation, schooling (secondary and higher education), and type of housing. This scale in the original study showed a Cronbach’s Alpha of r = 0.83, however, in this study, it showed r= 0.87.
The scale was applied in a traditional pencil and paper form. It was administered by two of the researchers. The older adults were previously informed about the contents of the scale and the time to respond (20 to 30 minutes approximately). At all times, the interviewers were together with the volunteers to resolve any type of doubt and/or difficulty.
Statistics
The normal distribution of the data was verified by Shapiro-Wilk. All data were normal. Subsequently, descriptive statistical values (mean, standard deviation, range) were calculated. Differences between sexes were verified through the t-test for independent samples. Differences between age categories were verified by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test of specificity. The effect size of the differences was determined by Cohen’s d test.13 The effect size was considered to be no effect (Cohen’s d < 0.20), small (Cohen’s d = 0.21 to 0.49), medium (Cohen’s d = 0.50 to 0.79), and large (Cohen’s d > 0.80). All calculations were performed in Excel spreadsheets and SPSS 18.0.
Results
The anthropometric variables and AB dimensions of older adults of both sexes are observed in Table 1. There were significant differences between both sexes in body weight, height, home life, and self-care (p<0.05). Males presented higher weight and height than females (median effect size d= 0.54 and 0.74), however, females presented higher values in the home life and personal care dimension than their male counterparts (effect size d= -0.46 and -0.48). There were no differences between the sexes in age, BMI, and the other AB dimensions (p>0.05).
The AB values and anthropometric measurements according to age ranges are shown in Table 2. In both sexes, we verified small effect sizes in the anthropometric measures and the 11 dimensions of AB (Cohen’s d <0.45). The mean values and deviations remained relatively stable throughout the three age ranges, except for body weight, where the effect size between the 70 to 75 years and 80 to 85 years categories was median (Cohen’s d 0.59).
The comparisons of AB and BMI according to the schooling of older adults of both sexes are shown in Figure 1. For example, males with secondary education presented 142.3 11.5 points with those with higher education 151.6±14.6 points (p<0.05), while females with secondary education obtained 149.4±15.2 points and with higher education 159.8±15.1 points (p<0.05).
Concerning BMI there were no differences in both sexes, in males the BMI with middle education was 29.5±2.3kg/m2, and with higher education was 29.5†5.1kg/m2 (p>0.05), and in women with middle education was 29.4†4.5kg/m2 and with higher education was 28.0±5.3kg/m2 (p>0.05).
Discussion
This study aimed to compare the AB patterns in older adults of both sexes according to age range and schooling. The results indicate that women presented a better performance in four of the AB dimensions (self-care, home life, self-direction, and socialization) compared to males. In addition, older adults of both sexes categorized with higher education evidenced better performance on the AB relative to their peers with secondary education.
In general, it is widely known that experiences acquired in older adults throughout life as they age, e.g., ways of coping with the environment, management of economic and social resources, relationships, and support systems could profoundly affect longevity and quality of life in older adults.14
In fact, in this study, females reflected better performance in self-care, home life, self-direction, and socialization, which evidences that gender seems to play a relevant role in AB. For example, self-care refers to the rational way, a positive attitude to maintain health and constancy during life,15 especially with basic hygiene (includes oral hygiene, bathing, defecation, shaving, brushing and combing hair), which procedures are vital for health.16 Some studies have evidenced that older adults (patients with heart failure), had lower self-care behaviors than women,17,18 which could explain the results of this study.
Home living activities refer to activities that have to do with cleaning at home, food preparation, and use of household appliances. These activities are characterized by living independently19 and there are often different social roles by gender, where females generally manage these activities more than males, although the increase in males participation is currently not exclusive to females.20
Figure 1.

Comparison of AB and BMI of older adults according to schooling.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the sample studied.
| Variables | Males (n= 30) | Females (N= 35) | Differences | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | SD | CI | X | SD | CI | P | d cohen | |
| Age (years) | 77.1 | 3.7 | 75.7-78.5 | 77.2 | 3.5 | 76.1-78.4 | 0.841 | -0.01 |
| Anthropometry | ||||||||
| Weight (kg) | 79.6 | 12 | 75.1-84.0 | 65 | 11 | 61.3-68.8 | 0.000 | 0.54 |
| Height (cm) | 164 | 6.2 | 161.9-166.6 | 152 | 5.3 | 149.6-153.3 | 0.000 | 0.74 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.5 | 3.9 | 28.0-30.9 | 28.4 | 5.0 | 26.7-30.1 | 0.332 | 0.12 |
| Adaptative behaviour | ||||||||
| Comunication | 13 | 1.8 | 12.3-13.6 | 13.5 | 1.7 | 12.9-14.1 | 0.243 | -0.14 |
| Use of resources | 15 | 1.7 | 14.3-15.6 | 15 | 2.1 | 14.3-15.7 | 0.896 | 0 |
| Home life | 12.2 | 2.1 | 11.4-12.9 | 14.3 | 1.9 | 13.6-14.9 | 0.000 | -0.46 |
| Health | 10.3 | 1.5 | 9.8-10.9 | 10.8 | 1.5 | 10.3-11.4 | 0.201 | -0.01 |
| Safety | 12.7 | 1.4 | 12.2-13.3 | 12.9 | 5.4 | 11.0-17.7 | 0.903 | -0.02 |
| Personal care | 16.7 | 1.7 | 16.0-17.3 | 18.6 | 1.8 | 18.0-19.2 | 0.000 | -0.48 |
| Functional skills | 16.8 | 2 | 16.0-17.6 | 15.6 | 2.8 | 14.7-16.6 | 0.059 | 0.24 |
| Leisure | 13.3 | 2.2 | 12.5-14.1 | 14 | 2.5 | 13.2-14.9 | 0.24 | -0.15 |
| Self-direction | 15.4 | 3 | 14.3-16.5 | 16.7 | 1.8 | 16.0-17.3 | 0.034 | -0.25 |
| Socialization | 12.1 | 2.3 | 11.2-13.0 | 13.1 | 1.4 | 12.7-13.6 | 0.026 | -0.25 |
| Functional capacity | 13 | 1.7 | 12.3-13.6 | 12.8 | 1.7 | 12.2-13.4 | 0.694 | 0.06 |
| Total scale (puntos) | 150 | 13 | 145.7-155.1 | 157 | 15 | 152.2-162.3 | 0.049 | -0.24 |
BMI, body mass index; X, mean; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.
Table 2.
Comparison of anthropometric means and AB values according to age ranges.
| Males | Differences | Females | Differences | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | 70 to 75 | 75 to 80 | 80 to 85 | 70 to 75 | 75 to 80 | 80 to 85 | ||||||||||||
| years (n=8) |
years (n=16) | years (n=6) |
years (n=10) | years (n=17) |
years (n=8) |
|||||||||||||
| X SD | X SD | X SD | a-b | a-c | b-c | X SD | X SD | X SD | a-b | a-c | b-c | |||||||
| Age (years) | 73 | 1 | 76.9 | 1.3 | 83.1 | 2.1 | -0.86 | -0.95 | -0.87 | 72.9 | 1.5 | 77.7 | 1.3 | 81.6 | 1.2 | -0.86 | -0.95 | -0.84 |
| Anthropometry Weight (kg) | 82.6 | 5 | 80.9 | 14 | 72.1 | 8.8 | 0.07 | 0.59 | 0.35 | 63 | 8.6 | 65.2 | 13 | 67 | 8.7 | -0.1 | -0.23 | -0.08 |
| Height (cm) | 166 | 6 | 164 | 6.5 | 164 | 5.3 | 0.45 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 149 | 5.8 | 152 | 4.5 | 153 | 6.2 | -0.27 | -0.27 | -0.05 |
| BMO (kg/m2) | 30 | 3 | 30.2 | 4.3 | 27 | 3.1 | -0.02 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 28.3 | 4.4 | 28.2 | 6 | 28.8 | 3.7 | 0 | -0.06 | -0.06 |
| Adaptive behaviour Communication | 13.3 | 1 | 13.1 | 1.6 | 12.2 | 2.9 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 12.9 | 1.8 | 13.6 | 2 | 14 | 0.8 | -0.18 | -0.37 | -0.13 |
| Use of resources | 14.8 | 1 | 14.8 | 2 | 15.8 | 1.2 | 0.00 | -0.37 | -0.29 | 15.7 | 1.6 | 14.9 | 1.5 | 14.5 | 3.3 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.08 |
| Home life | 11.6 | 2 | 12.7 | 2.1 | 11.5 | 2 | -0.25 | 0.02 | 0.28 | 14.6 | 0.7 | 14.1 | 2.5 | 14.1 | 1.8 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.00 |
| Health | 10.4 | 2 | 10.4 | 1.6 | 10.2 | 1.5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 10.6 | 1.6 | 11.2 | 1.5 | 10.3 | 1.5 | -0.19 | 0.09 | 0.29 |
| Safety | 12.6 | 1 | 12.6 | 1.7 | 13.5 | 1.5 | -0.07 | -0.3 | -0.05 | 11.9 | 2.4 | 12.1 | 2.2 | 15.6 | 1.5 | -0.04 | -0.23 | -0.22 |
| Personal care | 16.5 | 2 | 17.1 | 1.7 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 18.8 | 1.6 | 18.8 | 1.6 | 17.9 | 2.4 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
| Functional skills | 17.6 | 1 | 16.4 | 2.1 | 16.7 | 2.6 | 0.32 | 0.21 | -0.06 | 16.1 | 2.3 | 15.5 | 2.2 | 15.4 | 4.2 | 0.27 | 0.1 | 0.01 |
| Lesiure | 12.5 | 1 | 13.7 | 2.5 | 13.5 | 2.2 | -0.3 | -0.25 | 0.04 | 14.1 | 3.2 | 14.1 | 2.1 | 13.8 | 2.7 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Self-direction | 15.6 | 3 | 15 | 3.5 | 16 | 1.1 | 0.09 | -0.09 | -0.19 | 15.8 | 3 | 17.1 | 0.9 | 16.8 | 0.9 | -0.28 | -0.22 | 0.16 |
| Socialization | 12.6 | 2 | 12.1 | 2.6 | 11.3 | 1.9 | 0.11 | 0.33 | 0.17 | 12.6 | 1.9 | 13.2 | 1 | 13.6 | 1.1 | -0.19 | -0.31 | -0.15 |
| Functional sapacity | 12.5 | 2 | 13.3 | 1.4 | 12.7 | 2.4 | -0.27 | -0.05 | 0.15 | 13.2 | 1.3 | 13.2 | 1.5 | 11.5 | 2.1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Total scale (points) | 150 | 10 | 151 | 15 | 149 | 11 | -0.05 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 156 | 13 | 158 | 11 | 157 | 23 | -0.06 | -0.03 | 0.01 |
BMI, body mass index, X, mean, SD, standard deviation.
Regarding Self-direction activities, these refer to the organization and/or coordination of their own life,21 for example, to the organization and planning of activities at home, such as appointments and meetings. This avoids setbacks and delays in their daily activities, which is apparently determinant for the females in this study. In general, females are more likely to implement protective behaviors towards self-care.22
As for socialization, it is classically known for the beneficial effects of real life support.23 These have to do with relationships with relatives, bonds of friends, group meetings, and others. Female socialization often emphasizes verbal expressiveness and focuses on warmth and intimacy seeking24 and some studies have even highlighted gender differences in socialization, where higher levels of social participation are observed more in older females than males.25,26
In sum, apparently, about these five dimensions of AB, the «stay alive» theory proposed by Anne Campbell is fulfilled in this study, since it is highlighted that females produce stronger self-protective reactions than men to aggressive threats because self-protection tends to have a higher AB value for females than for males,27 which evidences a higher AB in favor of females.
In this study, we also verified that older adults of both sexes categorized with higher education presented elevated AB values relative to their peers with secondary education. This shows that demographic and contextual factors are closely linked to the AB of the studied older adults. Some studies related to quality of life have shown that demographic factors and educational level achieved, race/ethnicity,28 and financial security have reached higher levels of quality of life in older adults.29
This shows that the level of schooling (higher education) plays a relevant role among older adults, as it guarantees a better AB. These findings may provide an important point for intervention in quality of life among older adults.30 In addition, schooling may have a profound impact on older adults’ AB, as it may aid in the adoption of preventive behaviors during senescence. An increase in educational attainment is accompanied by increased awareness, a greater sense of responsibility, improved self-efficacy, and increased judgment and decision-making ability31 among older adults.
The study has some limitations, these have to do with the sample selection (non-probabilistic), as the results cannot be generalized to other sociocultural contexts. The type of cross-sectional study does not allow for cause and effect relationships, which future studies should take into consideration and project longitudinal studies. Some strengths are also highlighted, given that this study is one of the first in Chile to investigate AB in three age ranges, whose information can serve as a baseline for future comparisons, as well as for implementing possible intervention programs to improve some AB domains (self-care, home life, self-direction, and socialization).
Conclusions
In conclusion, the results indicate that women performed better in adaptive capacities (AC). Particularly in areas such as self-care, family life, self-direction and socialization, compared to their male counterparts. In addition, it was observed that older adults of both genders with higher education achieved higher scores on AC compared to those with only high school education. These findings suggest that both gender and educational level play a significant role in the development of adaptive capacities in the older population.
List of abbreviations
- AC
adaptive capacities
- AB
adaptive behavior
- BMI
Body Mass Index
Contributor Information
Catalina Tapia Albornoz, Email: catalina.fta@gmail.com.
Rubén Vidal-Espinoza, Email: rvidale@gmail.com.
Andrew Philominraj, Email: andrew@ucm.cl.
Lilian Méndez Méndez, Email: lmendezm@alu.ucm.cl.
Wilbert Juvenal Cossio-Bolaños, Email: wilbert_dam@yahoo.com.
Rossana Gomez-Campos, Email: rossaunicamp@gmail.com.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
- 1.Schalock R, Borthwick-Duffy S, Bradley V, et al. Intellectual disability: Diagnosis, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). 2021; American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gomez-Campos R, Vidal-Espinoza R, Castelli Correia de Campos LF, et al. Validation of a Self-Perceived Adaptive Behaviors Scale in Older Chilean Women and Percentiles for Evaluation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tassé M. Adaptive Behavior. In: Shogren K, Wehmeyer M, Singh N. (eds) Handbook of Positive Psychology in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Springer Series on Child and Family Studies. Springer, Cham. 2017. 10.1007/978-3-319-59066-0_14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stern P, Carstensen L. The Aging Mind: Opportunities in Cognitive Research. National Academies Press (US). 2000. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ books/NBK44840/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Paterson DH, Warburton DE. Physical activity and functional limitations in older adults: a systematic review related to Canada’s Physical Activity Guidelines. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7:38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Spitzer S, Shaikh M, Weber D. Older Europeans’ health perception and their adaptive behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Public Health 2022;32: 322-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McPhee JS, French DP, Jackson D, et al. Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology 2016;17:567-80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gómez-Gómez ME, Zapico SC. Frailty, Cognitive Decline, Neurodegenerative Diseases and Nutrition Interventions. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:2842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mirowsky J, Ross CE. Education, personal control, lifestyle and health: A human capital hypothesis. Res Aging 1998;20:415–49. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mitchell UA, Ailshire JA, Brown LL, et al. Education and psychosocial functioning among older adults: 4-year change in sense of control and hopelessness. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2018;73:849-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Harper S, Lynch J, Hsu WL, et al. Life course socioeconomic conditions and adult psychosocial functioning. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:395-403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.International Society For The Advancement Of Kinanthropometry (Isak). International Standards for Anthropometic Assessment; ISAK: Underdale, SA, Australia. 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. 1988. 10.4324/9780203771587 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Poon LW, Martin P, Bishop A, et al. Understanding centenarians’ psychosocial dynamics and their contributions to health and quality of life. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 2010;2010:680657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Backman K, Hentinen M. Model for the self-care of home-dwelling elderly. J Adv Nurs 1999;30:564-72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goldenhart A, Nagy H. Assisting Patients with Personal Hygiene. StatPearls. 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/books/NBK563155/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dickson V, Worrall-Carter L, Kuhn L, Riegel B. Whose job is it? Gender differences in perceived role in heart failure self-care. J Nurs Healthcare Chronic Illness 2011;3:99–108. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Abe R, Sakata Y, Nochioka K, et al. Gender differences in prognostic relevance of self-care behaviors on mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure -A report from the CHART-2 Study. J Cardiol 2019;73:370-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Edemekong P, Bomgaars B, Sukumaran S, Schoo C. Activities of Daily Living. StatPearls. 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470404/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cerrato J, Cifre E. Gender inequality in household chores and work-family conflict. Front Psychol 2018;9:1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Döpp CME, Drenth H, Verkade PJ, et al. Interventions for improving self-direction in people with dementia: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2021;21:195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bruine de Bruin W, Bennett D. Relationships Between Initial COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Protective Health Behaviors: A National Survey. Am J Prev Med 2020;59:157-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Helgeson VS. Two important distinctions in social support: kind of support and perceived versus received. J Appl Soc Psychol 1993;23:825–45. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Olson DA, Shultz KS. Gender differences in the dimensionality of social support. J Appl Soc Psychol 1994;24:1221–32. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Agahi N, Parker MG. Leisure activities and mortality: does gender matter? J Aging Health 2008;20:855-71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Xiao S, Lin H, Zhao C, et al. Impact of different type and frequency of social participation on depressive symptoms among older chinese adults: is there a gender difference? Front Psychiatry 2021;12:758105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Benenson JF, Webb CE, Wrangham RW. Self-protection as an adaptive female strategy. Behav Brain Sci 2021;45:e128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Netuveli G, Wiggins RD, Hildon Z, Montgomery SM, Blane D. Quality of life at older ages: evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:357-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wiggins R, Higgs P, Hyde M, Blane D. Quality of life in the third age: Key predictors of the CASP-19 measure. Ageing Soc 2004;24:693–708. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schwartz RM, Bevilacqua KG, Alpert N, et al. Educational attainment and quality of life among older adults before a lung cancer diagnosis. J Palliat Med 2020;23: 498-505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Khorsandi M, Fekrizadeh Z, Roozbahani N. Investigation of the effect of education based on the health belief model on the adoption of hypertension-controlling behaviors in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging 2017;12:233-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
