Abstract
TDP-43 pathology frequently co-occurs with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), indicative of Limbic-predominant Age-related TDP-43 Encephalopathy neuropathologic changes (LATE-NC), which is associated with more severe medial temporal lobe (MTL) atrophy and cognitive decline compared to ‘pure’ AD. As both tau and TDP-43 target overlapping MTL structures and are associated with similar clinical manifestations, disentangling their respective contributions to neurodegeneration is essential yet challenging. In this study, we investigated the differential impact of tau and TDP-43 pathologies on MTL subregions, with a focus on the anterior-to-posterior and superior–-to-inferior gradients, and amygdala subnuclei. We analyzed structural MRI data from 85 ADNI participants with autopsy-confirmed neuropathology. Participants were stratified by Braak stage (Low tau: 0–III; High tau: IV–VI) and presence of TDP-43 pathology in the MTL. The presence of TDP-43 pathology was significantly associated with hippocampal head volume (R = −0.47, P < 0.01) and all amygdala subnuclei, while tau pathology was associated with parahippocampal gyrus thickness (R = −0.41, P < 0.01) and the central nucleus of the amygdala (R = −0.32, P < 0.05). In individuals with low tau burden, TDP-43 positivity was linked to widespread MTL atrophy, excluding the parahippocampal cortex (PHC), whereas in TDP-43-negative individuals, high tau pathology was associated with atrophy in the PHC and specific amygdala nuclei. Longitudinally, TDP-43 predicted faster hippocampal head volume loss (β = −6.71 mm3/year, P < 0.001), while tau pathology was associated with greater PHC thinning (β = −0.02 mm/year, P < 0.05). These results highlight an association between TDP-43 and the volume/thickness of anterior MTL regions while tau pathology was more associated with the volume/thickness of posterior MTL. However, it also suggests a superior-to-inferior gradient, TDP-43 predominantly affecting superior regions and tau affecting inferior MTL. Taken together, these findings suggest that the hippocampal head (anterior–superior) atrophy may differentiate AD patients with or without comorbid LATE-NC.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40478-025-02200-y.
Keywords: Tau, TDP-43, Antemortem MRI, Atrophy patterns, Alzheimer’s disease, Limbic-predominent age related TDP-43 Encephalopathy
Introduction
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most frequent cause of dementia in the elderly [18, 33] and is characterized by abnormal aggregation of amyloid-β (Aβ) and hyperphosphorylated tau protein into neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) [6]. About half of AD cases also present with TDP-43 inclusions at autopsy, known as Limbic-predominant Age-related TDP-43 Encephalopathy neuropathologic changes (LATE-NC) [1, 2, 26, 32, 35, 37]. Both tau and LATE pathologies originate in the medial temporal lobe (MTL). Due to their overlap in distribution patterns, they also underlie similar clinical manifestations including progressive cognitive decline starting with memory loss, eventually leading to dementia [37]. Besides the impact of LATE-NC on cognition in the otherwise healthy population, comorbid LATE-NC in AD has been shown to significantly impact clinical features associated with AD [25, 39]. Indeed, AD + LATE patients show higher Braak NFT stages and increased burden of tau NFTs at death [24, 27, 50], develop more severe dementia, greater hippocampal atrophy, and more pronounced memory decline over time compared to ‘pure’ AD patients [23, 24, 37].
A better understanding of how tau and TDP-43 pathologies contribute to MTL atrophy is critical, not only to better understand AD and LATE pathophysiology but also to support the development of biomarkers to distinguishing these entities in vivo. To date, TDP-43 pathology remains without validated in-vivo biomarkers, making LATE-NC diagnosable only at autopsy. This limitation complicates the ability to distinguish LATE from “pure” AD during life, a distinction that is becoming increasingly important in the context of emerging disease-modifying therapies. Given that therapeutic strategies may need to be adjusted to specific underlying pathologies: AD neuropathologic change (ADNC), LATE-NC, or both, identifying differential atrophy signatures associated with tau and TDP-43 could guide both clinical management and research trials [36, 39].
Although PET tracers targeting TDP-43 are under development, their clinical implementation remains distant, and fluid biomarker discovery is complicated by the intranuclear localization of TDP-43 [37]. In contrast, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a non-invasive approach to detect region-specific structural changes in vivo and has shown promise for identifying distinct atrophy patterns associated with tau and TDP-43 pathology. However, the current literature presents inconsistent findings: some studies have reported greater associations between tau and anterior MTL structures [43, 44, 57], others with posterior regions [11]. Similarly, the impact of TDP-43 pathology has been linked to anterior MTL [11, 17, 44] or whole MTL [12, 43, 54]. This variability reflects a lack of clarity regarding how each pathology affects the MTL. So far, only one longitudinal antemortem study investigated global hippocampal atrophy over time in LATE-NC [22] but did not examine anterior–posterior axis of the MTL. Furthermore, despite the early involvement of the amygdala in both AD and LATE, very few studies investigated the relative contributions of tau and TDP-43 to amygdala subnuclei atrophy [31, 53].
The goal of this study was therefore to identify in vivo MRI atrophy patterns associated with post-mortem tau and TDP-43 pathology. First, we examined atrophy along the anterior–posterior axis of the MTL. Second, we focused on the amygdala and its subnuclei. We analyzed data from participants with neuropsychological and longitudinal MRI data acquired during life and neuropathologic assessment obtained after death in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study.
Materials and methods
Data acquisition
Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the ADNI database (adni.loni.usc.edu). The ADNI was launched in 2003 as a public–private partnership, led by Principal Investigator Michael W. Weiner, MD. The primary goal of ADNI has been to test whether serial MRI, PET, other biological markers, and clinical and neuropsychological assessment can be combined to measure the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early AD. For up-to-date information, see www.adni-info.org.
Data was downloaded on April 1, 2024, and encompass data collected from September 2005 through December 2023.
Participants
Participants with available pathology data and at least one structural T1-weighted (T1w) MRI were selected from the ADNI database (N = 101). Ten participants were excluded due to a diagnosis of non-AD neurodegenerative disease (i.e. progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), frontotemporal dementia (FTLD) and six were excluded due to poor image or segmentation quality, leaving 85 participants for the analysis. These included 15 cognitively normal (CN), 41 MCI and 29 individuals with a clinical diagnosis of dementia at last MRI before death.
Neuropsychological data
Neuropsychological evaluations were conducted at participating ADNI sites on average 2.28 ± 2.79 years before death. Composite neuropsychological factor scores were computed based on the last neuropsychological evaluation before death and obtained from the ADNI database and included memory, executive function, language, and visuospatial functions.
The memory factor score included performance on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Logical Memory tests [14].
The executive function factor score included measures from the WAIS-R Digit Symbol Substitution test, Digit Span Backwards, Trail Making Tests A and B, Category Fluency, and the Clock Drawing Test [15].
The language factor score was derived from the Boston Naming Test, animal fluency, and selected items from the MMSE (object naming, sentence repetition, sentence reading and writing, and following a three-step command), the ADAS-Cog (following commands, object naming, ideational praxis), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; phonemic fluency and sentence repetition) [9].
The visuospatial factor score included the Clock Drawing Test, and selected items from the MMSE (copying interlocking pentagons), and the ADAS-Cog (constructional praxis item) [9].
MRI acquisition
3D T1w MRI scans in ADNI were acquired at respective sites from September 2005 to January 2020 using imaging protocols detailed in prior publications [21]. The resolution of the scans ranged from 0.94 × 0.94 × 1.2 to 1.25 × 1.25 × 1.2 mm3.
MRI processing
For each participant, all 3D T1w raw MRI data available from the ADNI database were downloaded from the ADNI archive website and processed locally.
For cross-sectional analysis, subcortical segmentation and cortical parcellation of structural MRI data was performed using FreeSurfer v7.2. Entorhinal cortex (ERC) and parahippocampal cortex (PHC) thickness measures were extracted from the Desikan-Kiliany atlas, and grouped together for some analyses under the term parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) [13]. Detailed segmentation was then performed for the hippocampal subfields and the amygdala subnuclei. The hippocampal formation was divided into hippocampal head, body and tail [19] while the amygdala was divided into nine subnuclei [47].
For longitudinal analysis, volumetric segmentation and parcellation was performed using a developmental toolbox for longitudinal analysis features (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) [19]. The FreeSurfer hippocampal subfield longitudinal processing stream was used to extract reliable longitudinal volumes estimates for both the amygdala and the hippocampus substructures [20].
All regions were averaged over the left and right hemispheres.
Neuropathology
All autopsies were performed at the respective site from April 2008 to December 2023. Most brains were fixed with formalin, except three that were fixed with paraformaldehyde. The tissues from the left hemispheres were then embedded in paraffin blocks and sectioned into 6 μm slices for immunohistochemistry. Hyperphosphorylated tau was stained with PHF-1 primary antibody (except one for which a non-phospho-specific tau antibody was used). Phospho-specific antibodies were used to stain TDP-43, except in one case where a non-phospho-specific antibody was used. However, no further antibody information was available. ADNC was established according to the criteria of Montine et al. [34]. The presence of Lewy body pathology (LBD), aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG), argyrophilic grain disease (AGD), small vessel disease, and microinfarcts was classified using pre-established criteria, respectively [3, 4, 7, 28].
A subset of participants benefited from detailed neuropathologic semi-quantification per anatomical regions (N = 51, autopsies performed before June 2018, scoring system for NFTs and TDP-43 inclusions is shown in Supplementary Table 1), whereas other participants (N = 30, autopsies after June 2018) had more summarized information including Braak stage, Thal phase, CERAD score, as well as dichotomous data on the presence or absence of TDP-43 lesions in the spinal cord, amygdala, hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and frontal cortex according to the Neuropathology NACC Form Version 11.
For the subset of participants with semi-quantitative data, an MTL composite score was calculated by averaging the scores of CA1, DG, ERC, PHC and amygdala for NFTs or TDP-43 inclusions including cytoplasmic inclusions, intranuclear inclusions, dystrophic neurites and glial inclusions.
LATE-NC diagnosis and stages were not formally assessed by the ADNI neuropathology core. We therefore classified individuals as TDP-43 positive if they exhibited at least one TDP-43 inclusion in the MTL (amygdala, ERC, hippocampus) or in the neocortex [37], while those without were classified as TDP-43-negative. Diagnoses of FTLD or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) were excluded. LATE-NC staging system was retrospectively assessed with available data and was based on Nelson et al. [37, 38]: stage 1 was defined as TDP-43 inclusions in the amygdala region or hippocampus, stage 2 as TDP-43 inclusions in the amygdala and hippocampus, and stage 3 in the aforementioned regions and the frontal cortex.
Participants were grouped based on Braak NFT stages and the presence of TDP-43 inclusions in the MTL at autopsy: participants with Braak stage ≤ III were classified as Low tau, while Braak stages ≥ IV were considered as High tau. We did not have enough participants with Braak 0 (n = 2) to include a group without tau pathology. We therefore obtained 4 study groups: (1) Low tau, TDP-43-negative, (2) High tau, TDP-43-negative, (3) Low tau, TDP-43-positive, (4) High tau, TDP-43-positive.
Statistics
Demographics and postmortem data
Demographic data was compared between groups using ANOVA for parametric data, Mann–Whitney tests for non-parametric continuous data and Fisher tests for dichotomous data. Semi quantitative scores for NFTs and TDP-43 inclusions were compared between groups using multiple linear regression models and post-hoc contrast analysis controlling for age and sex.
Neuropsychology factor scores
We compared the last neuropsychology factor score for each domain (memory, executive functions, language and visuospatial functioning) acquired before death between groups based on tau (low/high) and TDP-43 (negative/positive) using linear regression and post-hoc contrast analyses (N = 85), with ‘Low tau, TDP-43-negative' as the reference group and controlling for age, sex, interval between neuropsychological evaluation and death and years of education.
Cross sectional imaging analyses
Cross sectional analyses were performed on the last MRI acquired before death (3 ± 2.95 years before death). We first investigated the association between MTL substructures volume or thickness and TDP-43 and NFTs semi-quantitative scores in the MTL using partial Spearman correlation (subset data, N = 51). To assess independent contribution of these proteinopathies to volume/thickness loss, we controlled for NFTs levels when assessing TDP-43 and for TDP-43 when assessing NFTs. We used one-tailed test, anticipating negative associations. Second, we compared volume/thickness of MTL substructures between groups based on tau (low/high) and TDP-43 (negative/positive) using linear regression and post-hoc contrast analyses (N = 85), with ‘Low tau, TDP-43-negative' as the reference group. Results were then repeated with the first MRI available (6.5 ± 3.5 years before death).
All analyses were FDR corrected and adjusted for age at death, sex, intracranial volume, and the interval between MRI and death.
Longitudinal imaging analyses
Longitudinal analyses were performed on all subjects who had at least two MRI scans acquired before death (number of participants = 82, total number of MRI scans = 452 over an average 4.81 ± 3.24 years of follow-up). We used linear mixed models (LMM) to examine the longitudinal effects of TDP-43 or tau pathologies on MTL volumes or thicknesses. We predicted the volume of the hippocampal head and the thickness of the PHC based on the interaction between TDP-43 (negative/positive) or tau (low/high) groups and time before death, adjusting for the other pathology. LMM included a random intercept for each patient to account for individual variability. We controlled for potential confounders, including age at death, sex, and estimated total intracranial volume. Interaction between time and age was also included to capture the influence on the longitudinal trajectories.
All analyses were FDR corrected for multiple comparisons and computed in R version 4.2.2 (packages ppcor, emmeans and lme4).
Results
Participant characteristics and neuropathologic outcomes
At the time of the last MRI, participants (N = 85) were on average 81.2 years old (SD = 6.9), and 28.2% were female, with no significant demographic differences between groups (Table 1). At death, 74.1% of the participants showed neocortical tauopathy (Braak IV-VI, ‘High Tau’), while 50.6% had TDP-43 inclusions in the MTL (‘TDP-43-positive’). Both 'High Tau' groups included significantly more cognitively impaired individuals than the 'Low Tau' groups (Table 1, Fig. 1A). The presence of TDP-43 did not affect the proportion of clinically impaired individuals.
Table 1.
Demographic and neuropathologic profiles of the participants
| Low tau No TDP-43 |
High tau No TDP-43 |
Low tau TDP-43 MTL |
High tau TDP-43 MTL |
p-Value | Post-Hoc Comparisons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| N | 13 | 29 | 9 | 34 | ||
| Age at death (years) | 83.6 ± 6.8 | 79.6 ± 6.1 | 85.0 ± 3.4 | 80.5 ± 7.9 | 0.11 | / |
| Sex, F (%) | 1 (7.69%) | 9 (31.03%) | 2 (22.22%) | 12 (35.29%) | 0.28 | / |
| Cognitive status at last MRI | 0.004 | |||||
| CN | 5 (38.46%) | 4 (13.79%) | 3 (33.33%) | 3 (8.82%) | Group 1 ≈ 2 ≈ 3 ≈ 4 | |
| MCI | 8 (61.54%) | 16 (55.17%) | 5 (55.56%) | 12 (35.29%) | Group 1 ≈ 3 < 2 ≈ 4 | |
| Dementia | 0 | 9 (31.03%) | 1 (11.11%) | 19 (55.88%) | Group 1 ≈ 3 < 2 ≈ 4 | |
| APOE ε4 carriers (%) | 3 (23.1%) | 22 (75.9%) | 1 (11.1%) | 23 (67.6%) | < 0.001 | Group 1 ≈ 3 < 2 ≈ 4 |
| Braak NFT stage | 1.92 ± 0.86 | 5.21 ± 0.56 | 1.56 ± 0.76 | 5.14 ± 0.70 | < 0.001 | Group 1 ≈ 3 < 2 ≈ 4 |
| 0 | 1 (7.69%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| I | 2 (15.38%) | 0 | 5 (55.56%) | 0 | ||
| II | 7 (53.85%) | 0 | 3 (33.33%) | 0 | ||
| III | 3 (23.08%) | 0 | 1 (11.11%) | 0 | ||
| IV | 0 | 2 (6.89%) | 0 | 6 (17.65%) | ||
| V | 0 | 19 (65.52%) | 0 | 17 (50%) | ||
| VI | 0 | 8 (27.59%) | 0 | 11 (32.35%) | ||
| Thal Aβ Phase | 2.46 ± 1.90 | 4.69 ± 0.54 | 2.67 ± 1 | 4.59 ± 0.78 | < 0.001 | Group 1 ≈ 3 < 2 ≈ 4 |
| 0 | 3 (23.08%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 2 (15.38%) | 0 | 2 (22.22%) | 1 (2.94%) | ||
| 2 | 1 (7.69%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | 2 (15.38%) | 1 (3.45%) | 6 (66.67%) | 0 | ||
| 4 | 3 (23.08%) | 7 (24.14%) | 1 (11.11%) | 10 (29.41%) | ||
| 5 | 2 (15.38%) | 21 (72.41%) | 0 | 23 (67.65%) | ||
| CERAD | 0.15 ± 0.38 | 2.72 ± 0.70 | 0.67 ± 0.50 | 2.64 ± 0.77 | < 0.001 | Group 1 ≈ 3 < 2 ≈ 4 |
| 0 | 11 (84.62%) | 1 (3.44%) | 3 (33.33%) | 1 (2.94%) | ||
| 1 | 2 (15.38%) | 1 (3.44%) | 6 (66.67%) | 3 (8.82%) | ||
| 2 | 0 | 3 (10.34%) | 0 | 3 (8.82%) | ||
| 3 | 0 | 24 (82.76) | 0 | 27 (79 .41%) | ||
| LATE-NC stage | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 2.33 ± 0.5 | 1.94 ± 0.78 | < 0.001 | Group 1 ≈ 2 < 3 ≈ 4 |
| Other neuropathologies | ||||||
| LBD (%) | 4 (30.8%) | 15 (51.7%) | 5 (55.6%) | 19 (55.9%) | 0.47 | / |
| ARTAG (%) | 0 | 3 (10.3%) | 1 (11.1%) | 7 (20.6%) | 0.27 | / |
| AGD (%) | 5 (38.5%) | 3 (10.3%) | 5 (55.6%) | 12 (35.3%) | 0.027 | Group 1 ≈ 2 < 3 ≈ 4 |
| Last MRI – death interval (years) | 1.53 ± 1.53 | 2.25 ± 2.44 | 2.85 ± 3.46 | 4.51 ± 3.10 | 0.002 | Group 1 ≈ 2 ≈ 3 < 4 |
Differences between groups were assessed with the Mann–Whitney or Fisher tests. Braak NFT stages, Thal Aβ Phase, CERAD and LATE-NC stages were evaluated based on previous work respectively (Braak & Braak 1991, 1995; Thal et al. 2002, Montine et al. 2012, Nelson et al. 2019, 2023). LBD, ARTAG and ADG diagnosis were based on established criteria respectively (Braak & Braak 1998; Kovacs et al. 2016; Attems et al. 2021)
Symbol meanings: “≈” indicates no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05); “ < ” indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), with the group on the left having lower values than the group on the right; “ > ” indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), with the group on the left having higher values than the group on the right
CN: Cognitively Normal; MCI: Mild cognitive impairment; NFTs: Neurofibrillary tangles; Aβ: Amyloid-beta; CERAD: Consortium to Established a Registry for Alzheimer’s disease; LATE-NC: Limbic predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathologic changes; LBD: Lewy Body disease; ARTAG: Aging-related tau astrogliopathy; AGD: Argyrophilic grain disease
Fig. 1.

Cognitive and neuropathologic characteristics of the studied population. (A–C) Bar plots illustrate the prevalence of (A) cognitive status (CN/MCI/Dementia), (B) Braak NFT stages, and (C) LATE-NC stages split by groups based on levels of tau pathology and TDP-43 presence. (D, E) Boxplots represent the distribution of (D) neurofibrillary tangles or (E) TDP-43 inclusions within the MTL per group. This analysis includes 85 participants for panel A-C (including 13 Low tau, TDP-43 negative individuals (grey), 29 High Tau, TDP-43 negative individuals (orange), 9 Low tau, TDP-positive individuals (blue) and 34 High Tau, TDP-43 positive individuals (purple)) and 51 participants for panel D,E (including 10 Low tau, TDP-43 negative individuals (grey), 19 High Tau, TDP-43 negative individuals (orange), 5 Low tau, TDP-positive individuals (blue) and 16 High Tau, TDP-43 positive individuals (purple)). Reported p values are p values adjusted for age at death and sex: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. Abbreviations: CN: Cognitively Normal; MCI: Mild cognitive impairment; NFTs: Neurofibrillary tangles; LATE: Limbic predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy; MTL: Medial temporal lobe
‘High tau’ groups showed higher Braak NFT stages but also higher Thal Aβ Phase and CDR than the ‘Low tau’ groups, suggesting a higher AD likelihood. Of note, no difference in the proportion of comorbid neuropathologies, including LBD, AGD, and ARTAG, was observed between groups.
Although a weak association was observed between NFTs and TDP-43 burdens (R = 0.07, P = 0.03), the prevalence of both neuropathologies was independent from each other, i.e., participants with low Braak stages were as likely to have TDP-43 pathology as participants with high Braak stages (Fig. 1B). The semi-quantitative analyses revealed that individuals with high Braak stages had more NFTs deposits in the MTL than individuals with low Braak NFT stages (Fig. 1D, P< 0.001), indicating that Braak stage could serve as a proxy for MTL tau pathology in individuals with no semi-quantitative assessment. As expected based on our group selection, the 'TDP-43-positive' groups also had significantly more TDP-43 inclusions in the MTL compared to the 'TDP-43-negative' groups (Fig. 1E, P< 0.0001). The 'High Tau, TDP-43-positive' group had more TDP-43 inclusions in the MTL than the 'Low Tau, TDP-43-positive' group (P < 0.05). Interestingly, the ‘low tau, TDP-43-postive’ group did not contain any LATE-NC-stage 1 individuals (Fig. 1C).
Neuropsychological factor scores
We first evaluated the contribution of tau and TDP-43 pathologies to impairment in different cognitive domains (N = 85). Individuals with higher levels of tau pathology showed impaired memory (Fig. 2A: β < −2.13, P < 0.0001), executive functions (Fig. 2B: β < −0.93, P < 0.0001), and language (Fig. 2C: β < −1.75, P < 0.0001) compared to the ‘Low tau, TDP-43-negative’ group. In contrast, TDP-43-positive individuals with low tau levels (‘Low tau, TDP-43-positive’) only had memory impairment (Fig. 2A: β = −1.16, P < 0.001) but performed similarly to the ‘Low tau, TDP-43-negative’ group in language and executive functions (Fig. 2B–C).
Fig. 2.

Ante-mortem factor cognitive scores across groups based on postmortem diagnosis. Boxplots represents (A) memory, (B) executive functions, (C) language and (D) visuo-spatial factor scores per group based on the levels of tau pathology and TDP-43 presence. This analysis includes 85 participants including 13 Low tau, TDP-43 negative individuals (grey), 29 High Tau, TDP-43 negative individuals (orange), 9 Low tau, TDP-positive individuals (blue) and 34 High Tau, TDP-43 positive individuals (purple). Reported p values are p values adjusted for age, sex, and years of education: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001
Associations of TDP-43 and NFT levels with MTL substructure volumes
We then performed partial Spearman correlations between substructures volume (i.e. hippocampal head-body-tail, amygdala subnuclei) or thickness (ERC, PHC) and NFTs and TDP-43 semi-quantitative ratings within the MTL (N = 51). When adjusting for NFTs levels, TDP-43 pathology was associated with almost all amygdala subnuclei volumes as well as the volume of the whole amygdala (Fig. 3; R = −0.40, P < 0.05), hippocampal head (R = −0.47, P < 0.05), and hippocampal body (R = −0.43, P < 0.05). After adjusting for TDP-43 levels, NFTs were associated with the volume of central nucleus (R = −0.32, P < 0.05) but not with the whole amygdala volume (R = −0.15, P = 0.20). NFTs were also significantly associated with hippocampal body volume (R = −0.34, P < 0.05) and the ERC thickness (R = −0.36, P < 0.05) and showed a trend toward association with PHC thickness (R = −0.28, P = 0.07). The volume of the hippocampal tail was weakly associated with both neuropathologies (Fig. 3, P < 0.10).
Fig. 3.
Relationship between post-mortem pathology measures and ante-mortem MTL measures. Spearman partial correlations were computed between postmortem semi-quantitative scores of NFT and TDP-43 inclusions that were measured within the medial temporal lobe and ante-mortem medial temporal lobe volumes (N = 51). Medial temporal lobe volumes were first divided into amygdala subnuclei and hippocampal head, body and tail, then regrouped into amygdala and hippocampus. Reported p values are p values adjusted for age, sex, interval between the last MRI and death and either levels of NFTs or TDP-43. Measurements that survived FDR correction are highlighted in bold font. Abbreviations: NFTs: Neurofibrillary tangles; HATA: Hippocampo-amygdala transition; DG: Dentate Gyrus; ERC: Entorhinal Cortex; PHC: Parahippocampal Cortex; PHG: Parahippocampal gyrus; Hip: Hippocampus
Thus, partial correlations suggested a different anatomical effect of both neuropathologies with TDP-43 affecting the anterior MTL (amygdala and hippocampal head) and tau affecting the posterior MTL (hippocampal body and PHG). We also observed that TDP-43 affected the whole volume of the amygdala, whereas NFTs only affected the central nuclei.
Volumetric differences by Tau and TDP-43 groups
To confirm our results on the contributions of both neuropathologies on MTL volume loss, we investigated differences in volume/thickness based on the levels of tau (Low vs. High) and TDP-43 (Negative vs. Positive; N = 85). We first focused on volume loss along the anterior–posterior axis (Fig. 4). Consistent with the correlational analyses, individuals from the ‘Low tau, TDP-43-positive’ group had atrophy in the amygdala (Fig. 4A: β = −346 mm3, P < 0.01), the hippocampal head (Fig. 4B: β = −358 mm3, P < 0.001), and the hippocampal body (Fig. 4C: β = −236 mm3, P < 0.001), but no atrophy in the PHC (P = 0.16) compared to the ‘Low tau, TDP-43-negative’ group. They also had atrophy in the ERC (β = −76 mm], P < 0.001) and the hippocampal tail (β = −109.25 mm3, P < 0.01) compared to the TDP-43-negative individuals with low tau, but not when compared to individuals with TDP-43-negative and high tau levels (PERC = 0.26; PHippocampal Tail = 0.14), indicating that these structures were less vulnerable for TDP-43 related atrophy. In contrast, individuals with high tau, but TDP-43-negative had atrophy in the hippocampal body (β = −137 mm3, P < 0.05), the ERC (β = −0.49 mm, P < 0.01), and the PHC (β = −0.28 mm, P < 0.01), compared to low tau, TDP-43-negative individuals. Finally, when looking at data per Braak and LATE-NC stages, we noted that volumetric differences were observed from Braak NFT stage V (Sup. Figure 1) and LATE-NC stage 2 (Sup. Figure 2), i.e., with neocortical tau and hippocampal TDP-43 deposits, respectively.
Fig. 4.
Cross sectional ante-mortem MTL volumes difference across groups based on postmortem diagnosis. Boxplots represent (A) amygdala, (B) hippocampal head, (C) hippocampal body, (D) and hippocampal tail volumes as well as (E) entorhinal and (F) parahippocampal cortices thickness per group based on the levels of tau pathology and TDP-43 presence. This analysis includes 85 participants including 13 Low tau, TDP-43 negative individuals (grey), 29 High Tau, TDP-43 negative individuals (orange), 9 Low tau, TDP-positive individuals (blue) and 34 High Tau, TDP-43 positive individuals (purple). Reported p values are p values adjusted for age, sex, intracranial volume and interval between the last MRI and death: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001
We then focused on the amygdala subnuclei atrophy (Fig. 5). Individuals from the ‘Low tau, TDP-43-positive’ group had atrophy in all amygdala subnuclei compared to the ‘Low tau, TDP-43-negative’ group. They also had atrophy in the anterior amygdaloid area (β = −7.40 mm3, P < 0.05), basal nucleus (β = −67.25 mm3, P < 0.05) and paralaminar nucleus (β = −9.01 mm3, P < 0.01) compared to the TDP-43-negative individuals with higher levels of tau. In contrast, individuals with high tau, but TDP-43-negative only had atrophy in the anterior amygdaloid area (β = −6.68 mm3, P < 0.05), central (β = −9.41 mm3, P < 0.001), cortical (β = −4.01 mm3, P < 0.01) and accessory basal nuclei (β = −41.85 mm3, P < 0.01) compared to low tau, TDP-43-negative individuals.
Fig. 5.
Cross sectional ante-mortem amygdala volumes difference across groups based on postmortem diagnosis. Boxplots represent amygdala subnuclei volume per group based on the levels of tau pathology and TDP-43 presence. This analysis includes 85 participants including 13 Low tau, TDP-43 negative individuals (grey), 29 High Tau, TDP-43 negative individuals (orange), 9 Low tau, TDP-positive individuals (blue) and 34 High Tau, TDP-43 positive individuals (purple). Reported p values are p values adjusted for age, sex, intracranial volume and interval between the last MRI and death: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001
To confirm that amygdala atrophy was non-uniform in individuals with high levels of tau pathology, we replicated the analyses while accounting for the global volume of the amygdala. We found that the volumes of the accessory basal nucleus (β = −14.02 mm3, P < 0.05), and the central nucleus (β = −6.01 mm3, P < 0.05), were further reduced compared to the whole amygdala in the presence of elevated NFTs levels. We reproduced the analysis using the first MRI available (6.5 ± 3.5 years before death). Observations were similar to those obtained using the last MRI before death.
Cross sectional results (partial correlations and volume differences among the groups) were slightly less significant but similar when adjusting for years of education, MRI scanner strength, or other neuropathologic disease including Thal phases, LBD, ARTAG, AGD and vascular pathology (including small vessel disease and microinfarcts; Sup. Tables 2–3). Analyses separating right and left volumes and thickness measures were also conducted and showed similar results across both hemispheres (Sup. Tables 4–5).
Longitudinal atrophy patterns in relation to pathology
We then conducted a longitudinal analysis to assess how atrophy progressed before death, based on pathology determined after death (N = 82). Consistent with the cross-sectional analyses, both TDP-43 and tau pathology affected longitudinal atrophy of the amygdala (TDP-43: β = -9.99 mm3/year, P < 0.001; Tau: β = −12.06 mm3/year, P < 0.001, Fig. 6A–B) and ERC (TDP-43: β = −0.03 mm3/year, P < 0.05; Tau: β = −0.03 mm3/year, P < 0.05, Fig. 6C–D) while only TDP-43 affected longitudinal atrophy in the hippocampal head (β = −8.14 mm3/year, P < 0.001, Fig. 6E) and tau pathology affected atrophy in the PHC (β = −0.02 mm/year, P < 0.001, Fig. 6J). Interestingly, the hippocampal body volume was reduced at baseline in both TDP-43 positive and Tau-positive groups compared to the TDP-43 negative or tau negative groups, but longitudinal rate of atrophy did not differ between the negative and positive groups.
Fig. 6.
Longitudinal antemortem MTL volumes difference based on the levels of tau pathology or TDP-43 presence. Changes in the volume/thickness of the sub-structures of the medial temporal lobe over time before death (with 0 representing the time of death), categorized either by the presence of TDP-43 (left) or by levels of tauopathy (right). Structures with significantly faster volume reduction in TDP-43-positive compared to TDP-43-negative groups are highlighted in blue, while those with significantly faster volume reduction in high-tau compared to low-tau groups are highlighted in orange. Number of participants included in the analysis = 82, total number of MRI scans = 452 over an average 4.81 ± 3.24 years of follow-up. Reported p values are p values adjusted for age at death, sex, and intracranial volume: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. Abbreviations: ERC: entorhinal cortex; PHC: Parahippocampal cortex
Although the longitudinal plots suggested a potential increase in volume for the Low tau / TDP-43-negative group, statistical analyses confirmed that none of the trajectories were significantly different from zero.
We also accounted for the presence of other proteinopathies including LBD, AGD and ARTAG. Although ARTAG pathology significantly affected the volume loss of hippocampal head over time (β = −4.88 mm3/year, P < 0.05), TDP-43 was still the main driver of hippocampal head atrophy over time (β = −6.02 mm3/year, P < 0.01). Similarly, AGD affected the thickness loss of the PHC over time (β = −0.002 mm/year, P < 0.01), just as tau pathology (β = −0.002 mm/year, P < 0.01).
When excluding LATE-NC stage 1 cases (as mild TDP-43 pathology is not usually associated with dementia [10]), the results remained similar.
Discussion
Using antemortem MRI and neuropathologic data of the ADNI cohort, we highlight an association between TDP-43 and the volume/thickness of anterior–superior MTL regions (i.e. hippocampal head) while tau pathology was more associated with the volume/thickness of posterior-inferior MTL (i.e. PHC). In addition, we showed that the amygdala is homogeneously affected by TDP-43 while tau has a more pronounced effect on the medial amygdala.
Participants were classified based on tau distribution (Low/High) and the presence of TDP-43 (positive/negative) groups did not perfectly align with the diagnoses of AD, LATE, AD + LATE and controls, they served as proxies for these pathologies. Indeed, the 'High tau' groups exhibited higher Braak NFT stages, increased Thal Aβ phases, higher CDR scores, and a greater proportion of individuals with dementia compared to 'Low tau' groups, reflecting more severe AD pathology. Additionally, these groups showed higher NFT burdens in the MTL, supporting the validity of Braak staging as a proxy for MTL tau pathology.
Similar neuropsychological profiles
TDP-43 was primarily associated with memory impairment, while tau pathology was linked to multi-domain cognitive decline [37, 39]. These results align with the expected brain–behavior relationships: when only the MTL is affected, as in LATE, cognitive impairment is largely restricted to memory functions, whereas involvement of more widespread brain regions by pathology (e.g., tau) is associated with multi-domain cognitive deficits [41].
Atrophy patterns in the MTL
Our results do not fully align with previous similar studies showing an anterior-to-posterior gradient [11, 17] (see Wisse et al. 2025 [55] for review). Instead, they suggest an overlap between the previously described anterior-to-posterior gradient—where TDP-43 more predominantly affects anterior MTL structures (including the amygdala, ERC, and hippocampal head) and tau more predominantly affects posterior structures (including the hippocampal body and ERC)—and a newly observed superior-to-inferior gradient that has not been reported in the literature (Fig. 7). In this pattern, TDP-43 more predominantly affects superior MTL regions (including the amygdala and hippocampus, Fig. 7A), whereas tau more predominantly affects inferior MTL regions (including the ERC and PHC, Fig. 7B). This dual-gradient framework explains why anterior but inferior structures such as the ERC are also affected by tau, while posterior but superior structures such as the hippocampal body are also affected by TDP-43. Notably, hippocampal head volume (anterior–superior) emerged as the only structure consistently affected by TDP-43, while posterior-inferior structures as the PHC was uniquely affected by tau.
Fig. 7.
Illustration of the effect of TDP-43 and tau pathology on medial temporal atrophy. Structures shown in blue are specifically atrophied in the presence of TDP-43. Structures shown in orange are specifically atrophied in the presence of tau. The intensity of the coloring reflects how consistently each structure was identified as affected across up to three analyses performed in this study: partial correlations (Fig. 3), group-wise volume differences (Fig. 4), and longitudinal volume changes (Fig. 6). Structures colored more intensely were identified in all three analyses, whereas lighter shades indicate involvement in only one or two analyses
Although such a superior-to-inferior gradient has not yet been explicitly described in the literature, our findings align with previous studies. De Flores and colleagues (2020) reported that tau was best associated with the PHC (posterior-inferior) and TDP-43 with the anterior hippocampus (anterior–superior) [11]. Similarly, Denning and colleagues observed TDP-43 effects on hippocampal volumes in regions comparable to those identified in our study (anterior and posterior hippocampus as well as the ERC; they did not investigate the amygdala), all of which are anterior or superior structures [12]. In addition, postmortem MRI studies have shown stronger associations between tau and the lateral ERC [30, 43]. These observations suggest that the anterior-to-posterior model may be incomplete and that a potential superior-to-inferior gradient in the distribution of tau and TDP-43 pathology warrants further investigation.
Using longitudinal analyses, we found progressive hippocampal head atrophy in patients with TDP-43 pathology, and progressive PHC atrophy in those with tau pathology. To date, only one prior longitudinal study had observed faster global hippocampal atrophy in AD patients with TDP-43 than in those without [22]. Our results refine this observation by demonstrating that the atrophy is primarily localized to the hippocampal head.
Taken together, these results suggest that hippocampal head atrophy in AD patients may reflect the presence of comorbid LATE-NC. Our results support the recent use of the hippocampal head volume/PHC thickness ratio as an MRI-based proxy of TDP-43 pathology [29].
These findings may also guide future neuropsychological research. Specifically, one may assume that tests targeting anterior hippocampal functions could highlight differences between patients with AD and those with AD + LATE. The anterior hippocampus is known to support pattern completion [45] (i.e., the ability to recall associated items), emotional processing [40], and social cognition due to its connections with the amygdala and anterior temporal lobe [16]. Similarly, semantic deficits have been observed in LATE and are associated with the anterior temporal pole [56]. Future studies should examine whether tasks assessing these aspects can reveal distinct profiles while minimizing the influence of other cognitive domains.
Interestingly, we did not observe a synergistic effect of tau and TDP-43 pathologies, i.e., no greater atrophy or increased memory deficits in individuals presenting with both pathologies compared to those with only one. This finding contrasts with previous literature suggesting that the combination of tau and TDP-43 pathologies worsens cognitive decline, neuronal loss, and medial temporal lobe atrophy [24, 25, 50]. This discrepancy may be explained by methodological differences. Specifically, the High Tau, TDP-43 positive group included fewer individuals with advanced LATE stages, whereas the Low Tau, TDP-43 positive group included some participants with more advanced LATE-NC stages. This disparity in pathology severity could influence the differences in atrophy observed between groups. Moreover, the Low Tau, TDP-43 positive group included only 9 participants, which likely limited our statistical power to detect significant differences between groups.
Differential effect of TDP-43 and tau on amygdala atrophy
Beyond the anterior–superior to posterior-inferior gradient in the MTL, our results emphasize a differential impact of TDP-43 and tau on amygdala atrophy. Specifically, TDP-43 appears to affect the whole amygdala volume, whereas tau pathology is associated with selective atrophy of specific subnuclei, including the central, medial, cortical, and accessory basal nuclei, as well as the anterior amygdaloid area, corresponding to the medial section of the amygdala (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8.
Illustration of the effect of TDP-43 and tau pathology on amygdala subnuclei atrophy. Structures shown in blue are specifically atrophied in the presence of TDP-43. Structures shown in orange are specifically atrophied in the presence of tau. The intensity of the coloring reflects how consistently each structure was identified as affected across up to two analyses performed in this study: partial correlations (Fig. 3) and group-wise volume differences (Fig. 5). Structures colored more intensely were identified in both analyses, whereas lighter shades indicate involvement in only one analysis. Abbreviations: AB: Accessory Basal nucleus; B: Basal nucleus; CAT: Cortico-amygdaloid transition; Ce: Central nucleus; Co: Cortical nucleus; M: Medial nucleus; Lat: Lateral nucleus; P: Paralaminar nucleus
Little is known about the distribution of TDP-43 burden within the amygdala. However, our findings align with recent evidence showing a relatively uniform distribution of TDP-43 inclusions across the amygdala in LATE-NC. They are also partially consistent with earlier work [31, 53] suggesting that TDP-43 affects lateral and medio-central amygdala regions. Another study investigating subnuclear amygdala atrophy across FTLD subtypes found that, except for FTLD-TDP type B, most TDP-43 subtypes were associated with global amygdala involvement. Divergences across studies may reflect differences in postmortem diagnostic classification. Further research is needed to confirm the effects of TDP-43 on amygdala subnuclei [5].
In contrast, the effect of tau on amygdala subnuclei is well documented. Our findings are consistent with previous neuropathologic [8, 51, 52], postmortem imaging [48, 57] and in vivo MRI studies [46] demonstrating selective vulnerability of certain nuclei to tau pathology. Specifically, the volumes of the central, cortical, medial, and accessory basal nuclei are consistently associated with tau burden, whether measured via tau-PET or postmortem analysis [46]. These findings support the hypothesis that distinct amygdala subregions exhibit variable susceptibility to tau pathology, possibly due to differences in their structural and functional connectivity. Indeed, the identified nuclei structural connections the locus coeruleus [6], olfactory bulbs [49], CA1 and ERC [42] who all show early tau deposition in the context of AD [6].
Given the distinct patterns of amygdala involvement by tau and TDP-43, future studies should investigate their clinical implications. For instance, it would be of interest to assess whether these different atrophy patterns translate into distinct memory, olfaction or anxiety profiles between AD and LATE.
Limitations
First, most patients were diagnosed with ADNC, limiting the ability to study pure LATE-NC cases. This reflects that these processes often overlap and interact, making it challenging to study their effects as fully independent. Our group-based comparisons should therefore be interpreted as reflecting relative contributions of each pathology rather than demonstrating true independence. To overcome this limitation, the analyses were controlled for the opposing pathology.
Regarding our selection criteria, we grouped patients based on TDP-43 presence and Braak NFT stages but small sample sizes in the ‘low tau’ groups reduced statistical power. Moreover, neuropathologic data was semi-quantitative, and for only a subset of participants (N = 51), further reducing statistical power. Finally, formal LATE-NC diagnosis was not assessed and was therefore inferred based on the presence or absence of TDP-43 inclusions in the MTL, without clear information about the level of pathology.
Additionally, the groups investigated in this study were based on Braak NFT and LATE-NC staging, which reflect the distribution, rather than the actual burden of tau and TDP-43 lesions. Therefore, one cannot exclude that slightly additional atrophy patterns could be observed when considering quantitative neuropathologic data. Nevertheless, data shows that the high tau groups (i.e. high Braak NFT stages) show higher burdens of tau in the MTL, compared to the low tau groups. Consistently, a recent study suggested a strong correlation between Braak NFT stages and tau and pathological burden in the MTL, respectively [12].
Second, antemortem MRI data was acquired up to ten years before death. While we accounted for this delay, neuropathologic changes during this interval could have influenced our findings. Nevertheless, antemortem MRI allows longitudinal analyses, and is easier to generalize to in vivo biomarkers than postmortem MRI.
Finally, automatic amygdala segmentation using FreeSurfer is relatively recent and has not yet been extensively validated. The lack of clear anatomical landmarks makes it difficult for the human eye to reliably correct automatic segmentations in the absence of post-mortem validation. Nevertheless, our conclusions do not relate to a specific nucleus, but rather to a broader region of the amygdala, in this case, the medial amygdala. Even if one nucleus were ultimately misclassified or omitted from our cluster, the general conclusion that the medial portion of the amygdala is more affected by tau pathology would remain valid. Despite these limitations, our study has strengths. Postmortem neuropathologic data were used to classify patients, instead of relying on the probable presence of TDP-43 and to exclude cases with FTLD, ALS, or non-AD tauopathies, ensuring our results are specific to tau and TDP-43 in the context of AD and LATE. More importantly, we leveraged longitudinal data covering up to 15 years of imaging history, enabling a comprehensive longitudinal study.
Conclusion
By combining antemortem MRI and neuropathologic data, we confirmed the already described anterior to posterior gradient of TDP-43 and tau with TDP-43 mostly affecting anterior MTL and tau predominantly affecting posterior MTL. We also denoted a superior-to-inferior gradient with TDP-43 preferentially affecting superior MTL and tau affecting posterior MTL. This pattern highlights hippocampal head atrophy (anterior–superior) as a potential imaging marker to identify patients with comorbid ADNC LATE-NC.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Anika Wuestefeld, PhD, for the amygdala subnuclei figure. Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the ADNI database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf.
Abbreviations
- Aβ
Amyloid-β
- AD
Alzheimer’s disease
- ADAS-Cog
Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive subscale
- ADNC
Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic change
- ADNI
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study
- AGD
Argyrophilic grain disease
- ALS
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- ARTAG
Aging-related tau astrogliopathy
- CBD
Corticobasal degeneration
- CERAD
Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s disease
- CN
Cognitively normal
- DG
Dentate Gyrus
- ERC
Entorhinal cortex
- FTLD
Frontotemporal dementia
- HATA
Hippocampo-amygdala transition area
- Hip
Hippocampus
- LATE
Limbic-predominant Age-related TDP-43 Encephalopathy
- LATE-NC
Limbic-predominant Age-related TDP-43 Encephalopathy neuropathologic change
- LBD
Lewy body disease
- LMM
Linear mixed models
- MCI
Mild cognitive impairment
- MoCA
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MTL
Medial temporal lobe
- NFTs
Neurofibrillary tangles
- PHC
Parahippocampal cortex
- PHG
Parahippocampal gyrus
- PSP
Progressive supranuclear palsy
- RAVLT
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
- T1w
T1-weighted
Author contributions
Y.S., J.G., S.O.T., and B.H. contributed to the study conception and design. Y.S. and J.G. performed the data analyses. Y.S. drafted the first version of the manuscript, B.H and S.O.T equally supervised the work. L.H. and L.Q. contributed to the discussion section. All authors critically revised the manuscript, provided feedback on previous versions, and approved the final version.
Funding
Y.S. was funded by the Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS), grant number FRIA40014635. L.H. was funded by the FNRS, grant number FNRS40016560. L.Q. was funded by a Fondation Recherche Alzheimer/Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek grant until September 2025 (SAO20240044) and has been a postdoctoral research fellow of the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique – FNRS (FC 95854) since October 2025. B.H. was funded by the FNRS, grant number CCL40010417, the FRFS-WELBIO, grant number 40010035 and Fondation Recherche Alzheimer/Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek, grant number SAO20210026 & SAO20240044. We also thank the Fondation Louvain and Saint-Luc Foundation who provided in-kind contributions. S.O.T. was funded by Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO), grant number 1225725N and Alzheimer’s Association (AARF-24-1300693). Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: AbbVie, Alzheimer’s Association; Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech; BioClinica, Inc.; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir, Inc.; Cogstate; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.; Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (http://www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute at the University of Southern California. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of Southern California.
Data availability
The ADNI dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available through the LONI Image and Data Archive (IDA), a secure research data repository.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The ADNI study was conducted according to Good Clinical Practice guidelines, the Declaration of Helsinki, US 21CFR Part 50 – Protection of Human Subjects, and Part 56 – Institutional Review Boards, and pursuant to state and federal HIPAA regulations. Written informed consent for the study was obtained from all subjects and/or authorized representative. More information can be found in the ADNI documentation.
Conflict of interest
S.O.T. received consultant honorary from Muna Therapeutics (Belgium).
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Sandra O. Tomé and Bernard Hanseeuw have equally supervised this work.
References
- 1.Amador-Ortiz C, Lin W, Ahmed Z, Personett D, Davies P, Duara R, Graff-Radford NR, Hutton ML, Dickson DW (2007) TDP-43 immunoreactivity in hippocampal sclerosis and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 61:435–445. 10.1002/ana.21154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arai T, Mackenzie IRA, Hasegawa M, Nonoka T, Niizato K, Tsuchiya K, Iritani S, Onaya M, Akiyama H (2009) Phosphorylated TDP-43 in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 117:125–136. 10.1007/s00401-008-0480-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arvanitakis Z, Capuano AW, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA, Schneider JA (2016) Relation of cerebral vessel disease to Alzheimer’s disease dementia and cognitive function in elderly people: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol 15:934–943. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30029-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Attems J, Toledo JB, Walker L, Gelpi E, Gentleman S, Halliday G, Hortobagyi T, Jellinger K, Kovacs GG, Lee EB, Love S, McAleese KE, Nelson PT, Neumann M, Parkkinen L, Polvikoski T, Sikorska B, Smith C, Grinberg LT, Thal DR, Trojanowski JQ, McKeith IG (2021) Neuropathological consensus criteria for the evaluation of Lewy pathology in post-mortem brains: a multi-centre study. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 141:159–172. 10.1007/s00401-020-02255-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bocchetta M, Iglesias JE, Cash DM, Warren JD, Rohrer JD (2019) Amygdala subnuclei are differentially affected in the different genetic and pathological forms of frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimers Dement Diagn Assess Dis Monit 11:136–141. 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Braak H, Braak E (1991) Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 82:239–259. 10.1007/BF00308809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Braak H, Braak E (1998) Argyrophilic grain disease: frequency of occurrence in different age categories and neuropathological diagnostic criteria. J Neural Transm 105:801–819. 10.1007/s007020050096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brady DR, Mufson EJ (1990) Amygdaloid pathology in Alzheimer’s disease: qualitative and quantitative analysis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1:5–17. 10.1159/000107115 [Google Scholar]
- 9.Choi S, Mukherjee S, Gibbons LE, Sanders RE, Jones RN, Tommet D, Mez J, Trittschuh EH, Saykin A, Lamar M, Rabin L, Foldi NS, Sikkes S, Jutten RJ, Grandoit E, Mac Donald C, Risacher S, Groot C, Ossenkoppele R, Crane PK (2020) Development and validation of language and visuospatial composite scores in ADNI. Alzheimer’s Dementia Transl Res Clin Intervent. 10.1002/trc2.12072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cykowski MD, Arumanayagam AS, Powell SZ, Rivera AL, Abner EL, Roman GC, Masdeu JC, Nelson PT (2022) Patterns of amygdala region pathology in LATE-NC: subtypes that differ with regard to TDP-43 histopathology, genetic risk factors, and comorbid pathologies. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 143:531–545. 10.1007/s00401-022-02416-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.De Flores R, Wisse LEM, Das SR, Xie L, McMillan CT, Trojanowski JQ, Robinson JL, Grossman M, Lee E, Irwin DJ, Yushkevich PA, Wolk DA (2020) Contribution of mixed pathology to medial temporal lobe atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 16:843–852. 10.1002/alz.12079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Denning AE, Ittyerah R, Levorse LM, Sadeghpour N, Athalye C, Chung E, Ravikumar S, Dong M, Duong MT, Li Y, Ilesanmi A, Sreepada LP, Sabatini P, Lowe M, Bahena A, Zablah J, Spencer BE, Watanabe R, Kim B, Sørensen MH, Khandelwal P, Brown C, Hrybouski S, Xie SX, De Flores R, Robinson JL, Schuck T, Ohm DT, Arezoumandan S, Porta S, Detre JA, Insausti R, Wisse LEM, Das SR, Irwin DJ, Lee EB, Wolk DA, Yushkevich PA (2024) Association of quantitative histopathology measurements with antemortem medial temporal lobe cortical thickness in the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Acta Neuropathol 148:37. 10.1007/s00401-024-02789-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, Buckner RL, Dale AM, Maguire RP, Hyman BT, Albert MS, Killiany RJ (2006) An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31:968–980. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crane PK, Carle A, Gibbons LE, Insel P, Mackin RS, Gross A, Jones RN, Mukherjee S, Curtis SM, Harvey D, Weiner M, Mungas D (2012) Development and assessment of a composite score for memory in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Brain Imaging Behav 6:502–516. 10.1007/s11682-012-9186-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gibbons LE, Carle AC, Mackin RS, Harvey D, Mukherjee S, Insel P, Curtis SM, Mungas D, Crane PK (2012) A composite score for executive functioning, validated in Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants with baseline mild cognitive impairment. Brain Imaging Behav 6:517–527. 10.1007/s11682-012-9176-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grady CL (2020) Meta-analytic and functional connectivity evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging for an anterior to posterior gradient of function along the hippocampal axis. Hippocampus 30:456–471. 10.1002/hipo.23164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Heywood A, Stocks J, Schneider JA, Arfanakis K, Bennett DA, Beg MF, Wang L (2022) The unique effect of TDP-43 on hippocampal subfield morphometry and cognition. Neuroimage Clin 35:103125. 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Carrillo MC, Dickson DW, Duyckaerts C, Frosch MP, Masliah E, Mirra SS, Nelson PT, Schneider JA, Thal DR, Thies B, Trojanowski JQ, Vinters HV, Montine TJ (2012) National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 8:1–13. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Iglesias JE, Augustinack JC, Nguyen K, Player CM, Player A, Wright M, Roy N, Frosch MP, McKee AC, Wald LL, Fischl B, Van Leemput K (2015) A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI. Neuroimage 115:117–137. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Iglesias JE, Van Leemput K, Augustinack J, Insausti R, Fischl B, Reuter M (2016) Bayesian longitudinal segmentation of hippocampal substructures in brain MRI using subject-specific atlases. Neuroimage 141:542–555. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jack CR, Bernstein MA, Fox NC, Thompson P, Alexander G, Harvey D, Borowski B, Britson PJ, Whitwell JL, Ward C, Dale AM, Felmlee JP, Gunter JL, Hill DLG, Killiany R, Schuff N, Fox-Bosetti S, Lin C, Studholme C, DeCarli CS, Krueger G, Ward HA, Metzger GJ, Scott KT, Mallozzi R, Blezek D, Levy J, Debbins JP, Fleisher AS, Albert M, Green R, Bartzokis G, Glover G, Mugler J, Weiner MW (2008) The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:685–691. 10.1002/jmri.21049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Josephs KA, Dickson DW, Tosakulwong N, Weigand SD, Murray ME, Petrucelli L, Liesinger AM, Senjem ML, Spychalla AJ, Knopman DS, Parisi JE, Petersen RC, Jack CR, Whitwell JL (2017) Rates of hippocampal atrophy and presence of post-mortem TDP-43 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 16:917–924. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30284-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Knopman DS, Hu WT, Stroh DA, Baker M, Rademakers R, Boeve BF, Parisi JE, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Petersen RC, Jack CR, Dickson DW (2008) Abnormal TDP-43 immunoreactivity in AD modifies clinicopathologic and radiologic phenotype. Neurology 70:1850–1857. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000304041.09418.b1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Weigand SD, Murray ME, Tosakulwong N, Liesinger AM, Petrucelli L, Senjem ML, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Ivnik RJ, Smith GE, Jack CR, Parisi JE, Petersen RC, Dickson DW (2014) TDP-43 is a key player in the clinical features associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 127:811–824. 10.1007/s00401-014-1269-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kapasi A, Yu L, Boyle PA, Barnes LL, Bennett DA, Schneider JA (2020) Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy, ADNC pathology, and cognitive decline in aging. Neurology. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.King A, Sweeney F, Bodi I, Troakes C, Maekawa S, Al-Sarraj S (2010) Abnormal TDP-43 expression is identified in the neocortex in cases of dementia pugilistica, but is mainly confined to the limbic system when identified in high and moderate stages of Alzheimer’s disease: TDP-43 expression in dementia pugilistica. Neuropathology 30:408–419. 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2009.01085.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Koper MJ, Tomé SO, Gawor K, Belet A, Van Schoor E, Schaeverbeke J, Vandenberghe R, Vandenbulcke M, Ghebremedhin E, Otto M, Von Arnim CAF, Balusu S, Blaschko MB, De Strooper B, Thal DR (2022) LATE-NC aggravates GVD-mediated necroptosis in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 10:128. 10.1186/s40478-022-01432-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kovacs GG, Ferrer I, Grinberg LT, Alafuzoff I, Attems J, Budka H, Cairns NJ, Crary JF, Duyckaerts C, Ghetti B, Halliday GM, Ironside JW, Love S, Mackenzie IR, Munoz DG, Murray ME, Nelson PT, Takahashi H, Trojanowski JQ, Ansorge O, Arzberger T, Baborie A, Beach TG, Bieniek KF, Bigio EH, Bodi I, Dugger BN, Feany M, Gelpi E, Gentleman SM, Giaccone G, Hatanpaa KJ, Heale R, Hof PR, Hofer M, Hortobágyi T, Jellinger K, Jicha GA, Ince P, Kofler J, Kövari E, Kril JJ, Mann DM, Matej R, McKee AC, McLean C, Milenkovic I, Montine TJ, Murayama S, Lee EB, Rahimi J, Rodriguez RD, Rozemüller A, Schneider JA, Schultz C, Seeley W, Seilhean D, Smith C, Tagliavini F, Takao M, Thal DR, Toledo JB, Tolnay M, Troncoso JC, Vinters HV, Weis S, Wharton SB, White CL, Wisniewski T, Woulfe JM, Yamada M, Dickson DW (2016) Aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG): harmonized evaluation strategy. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 131:87–102. 10.1007/s00401-015-1509-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lavrova A, Pham NTT, Vernon CJ, Carlos AF, Petersen RC, Dickson DW, Lowe VJ, Jack CR, Whitwell JL, Josephs KA (2024) A multimodal clinical diagnostic approach using MRI and 18F-FDG-PET for antemortem diagnosis of TDP-43 in cases with low–intermediate Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes and primary age-related tauopathy. J Neurol 271:4105–4118. 10.1007/s00415-024-12312-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Llamas-Rodríguez J, Oltmer J, Greve DN, Williams E, Slepneva N, Wang R, Champion S, Lang-Orsini M, Fischl B, Frosch MP, Van Der Kouwe AJW, Augustinack JC (2022) Entorhinal subfield vulnerability to neurofibrillary tangles in aging and the preclinical stage of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 87:1379–1399. 10.3233/JAD-215567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Makkinejad N, Schneider JA, Yu J, Leurgans SE, Kotrotsou A, Evia AM, Bennett DA, Arfanakis K (2019) Associations of amygdala volume and shape with transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) pathology in a community cohort of older adults. Neurobiol Aging 77:104–111. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.01.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McAleese KE, Walker L, Erskine D, Thomas AJ, McKeith IG, Attems J (2017) TDP-43 pathology in Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and ageing. Brain Pathol 27:472–479. 10.1111/bpa.12424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, Klunk WE, Koroshetz WJ, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rossor MN, Scheltens P, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Weintraub S, Phelps CH (2011) The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:263–269. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Montine TJ, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, Duyckaerts C, Frosch MP, Masliah E, Mirra SS, Nelson PT, Schneider JA, Thal DR, Trojanowski JQ, Vinters HV, Hyman BT (2012) National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease: a practical approach. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 123:1–11. 10.1007/s00401-011-0910-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nag S, Yu L, Capuano AW, Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA, Schneider JA (2015) Hippocampal sclerosis and TDP -43 pathology in aging and A lzheimer disease. Ann Neurol 77:942–952. 10.1002/ana.24388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nelson PT (2025) New criteria to predict LATE-NC in the clinical setting: probable/possible LATE and LANS. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 84:2–7. 10.1093/jnen/nlae113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nelson PT, Dickson DW, Trojanowski JQ, Jack CR, Boyle PA, Arfanakis K, Rademakers R, Alafuzoff I, Attems J, Brayne C, Coyle-Gilchrist ITS, Chui HC, Fardo DW, Flanagan ME, Halliday G, Hokkanen SRK, Hunter S, Jicha GA, Katsumata Y, Kawas CH, Keene CD, Kovacs GG, Kukull WA, Levey AI, Makkinejad N, Montine TJ, Murayama S, Murray ME, Nag S, Rissman RA, Seeley WW, Sperling RA, White CL, Yu L, Schneider JA (2019) Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE): consensus working group report. Brain 142:1503–1527. 10.1093/brain/awz099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nelson PT, Lee EB, Cykowski MD, Alafuzoff I, Arfanakis K, Attems J, Brayne C, Corrada MM, Dugger BN, Flanagan ME, Ghetti B, Grinberg LT, Grossman M, Grothe MJ, Halliday GM, Hasegawa M, Hokkanen SRK, Hunter S, Jellinger K, Kawas CH, Keene CD, Kouri N, Kovacs GG, Leverenz JB, Latimer CS, Mackenzie IR, Mao Q, McAleese KE, Merrick R, Montine TJ, Murray ME, Myllykangas L, Nag S, Neltner JH, Newell KL, Rissman RA, Saito Y, Sajjadi SA, Schwetye KE, Teich AF, Thal DR, Tomé SO, Troncoso JC, Wang S-HJ, White CL, Wisniewski T, Yang H-S, Schneider JA, Dickson DW, Neumann M (2023) LATE-NC staging in routine neuropathologic diagnosis: an update. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 145:159–173. 10.1007/s00401-022-02524-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nelson PT, Schneider JA, Jicha GA, Duong MT, Wolk DA (2023) When Alzheimer’s is LATE : why does it matter? Ann Neurol 94:211–222. 10.1002/ana.26711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nichols ES, Blumenthal A, Kuenzel E, Skinner JK, Duerden EG (2023) Hippocampus long-axis specialization throughout development: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 44:4211–4224. 10.1002/hbm.26340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ossenkoppele R, Schonhaut DR, Schöll M, Lockhart SN, Ayakta N, Baker SL, O’Neil JP, Janabi M, Lazaris A, Cantwell A, Vogel J, Santos M, Miller ZA, Bettcher BM, Vossel KA, Kramer JH, Gorno-Tempini ML, Miller BL, Jagust WJ, Rabinovici GD (2016) Tau PET patterns mirror clinical and neuroanatomical variability in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 139:1551–1567. 10.1093/brain/aww027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pikkarainen M, Rönkkö S, Savander V, Insausti R, Pitkänen A (1999) Projections from the lateral, basal, and accessory basal nuclei of the amygdala to the hippocampal formation in rat. J Comp Neurol 403:229–260. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990111)403:2%3c229::AID-CNE7%3e3.0.CO;2-P [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ravikumar S, Denning AE, Lim S, Chung E, Sadeghpour N, Ittyerah R, Wisse LEM, Das SR, Xie L, Robinson JL, Schuck T, Lee EB, Detre JA, Tisdall MD, Prabhakaran K, Mizsei G, De Onzono Martin MMI, Arroyo Jiménez MDM, Mũnoz M, Marcos Rabal MDP, Cebada Sánchez S, Delgado González JC, De La Rosa Prieto C, Irwin DJ, Wolk DA, Insausti R, Yushkevich PA (2024) Postmortem imaging reveals patterns of medial temporal lobe vulnerability to tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun 15:4803. 10.1038/s41467-024-49205-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ravikumar S, Wisse LEM, Lim S, Ittyerah R, Xie L, Bedard ML, Das SR, Lee EB, Tisdall MD, Prabhakaran K, Lane J, Detre JA, Mizsei G, Trojanowski JQ, Robinson JL, Schuck T, Grossman M, Artacho-Pérula E, De Onzoño Martin MMI, Del Mar Arroyo Jiménez M, Muñoz M, Romero FJM, Del Pilar Marcos Rabal M, Sánchez SC, González JCD, De La Rosa Prieto C, Parada MC, Irwin DJ, Wolk DA, Insausti R, Yushkevich PA (2021) Ex vivo MRI atlas of the human medial temporal lobe: characterizing neurodegeneration due to tau pathology. Acta Neuropathol Commun 9:173. 10.1186/s40478-021-01275-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Robin J, Moscovitch M (2017) Details, gist and schema: hippocampal–neocortical interactions underlying recent and remote episodic and spatial memory. Curr Opin Behav Sci 17:114–123. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.016 [Google Scholar]
- 46.Salman Y, Gérard T, Huyghe L, Colmant L, Quenon L, Malotaux V, Ivanoiu A, Lhommel R, Dricot L, Hanseeuw BJ (2024) Amygdala atrophies in specific subnuclei in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 10.1002/alz.14235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Saygin ZM, Kliemann D, Iglesias JE, Van Der Kouwe AJW, Boyd E, Reuter M, Stevens A, Van Leemput K, McKee A, Frosch MP, Fischl B, Augustinack JC (2017) High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging reveals nuclei of the human amygdala: manual segmentation to automatic atlas. Neuroimage 155:370–382. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Stouffer KM, Chen C, Kulason S, Xu E, Witter MP, Ceritoglu C, Albert MS, Mori S, Troncoso J, Tward DJ, Miller MI (2023) Early amygdala and ERC atrophy linked to 3D reconstruction of rostral neurofibrillary tau tangle pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin 38:103374. 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Swanson LW, Petrovich GD (1998) What is the amygdala? Trends Neurosci 21:323–331. 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01265-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tomé SO, Tsaka G, Ronisz A, Ospitalieri S, Gawor K, Gomes LA, Otto M, Von Arnim CAF, Van Damme P, Van Den Bosch L, Ghebremedhin E, Laureyssen C, Sleegers K, Vandenberghe R, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J, Thal DR (2023) TDP-43 pathology is associated with increased tau burdens and seeding. Mol Neurodegener 18:71. 10.1186/s13024-023-00653-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tsuchiya K, Kosaka K (1990) Neuropathological study of the amygdala in presenile Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci 100:165–173. 10.1016/0022-510X(90)90029-M [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Vogt LJK, Hyman BT, Van Hoesen GW, Damasio AR (1990) Pathological alterations in the amygdala in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience 37:377–385. 10.1016/0306-4522(90)90408-V [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wesseling A, Calandri IL, Bouwman MMA, Reijner N, Deshayes NAC, Barkhof F, Ossenkoppele R, Van De Berg WDJ, Rozemuller AE, Pijnenburg YAL, Hoozemans JJM, Jonkman LE (2025) Amygdalar and hippocampal volume loss in limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy. Brain. 10.1093/brain/awaf201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wisse LEM, Ravikumar S, Ittyerah R, Lim S, Lane J, Bedard ML, Xie L, Das SR, Schuck T, Grossman M, Lee EB, Tisdall MD, Prabhakaran K, Detre JA, Mizsei G, Trojanowski JQ, Artacho-Pérula E, De Iñiguez De Onzono Martin MM, M. Arroyo-Jiménez M, Muñoz Lopez M, Molina Romero FJ, P. Marcos Rabal M, Cebada Sánchez S, Delgado González JC, De La Rosa Prieto C, Córcoles Parada M, Wolk DA, Irwin DJ, Insausti R, Yushkevich PA (2021) Downstream effects of polypathology on neurodegeneration of medial temporal lobe subregions. Acta Neuropathol Commun 9:128. 10.1186/s40478-021-01225-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wisse LEM, Wuestefeld A, Murray ME, Jagust W, La Joie R (2025) Role of tau versus TDP‐43 pathology on medial temporal lobe atrophy in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 21:e14582. 10.1002/alz.14582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wolk DA, Nelson PT, Apostolova L, Arfanakis K, Boyle PA, Carlsson CM, Corriveau-Lecavalier N, Dacks P, Dickerson BC, Domoto-Reilly K, Dugger BN, Edelmayer R, Fardo DW, Grothe MJ, Hohman TJ, Irwin DJ, Jicha GA, Jones DT, Kawas CH, Lee EB, Lincoln K, Maestre GE, Mormino EC, Onyike CU, Petersen RC, Rabinovici GD, Rademakers R, Raman R, Rascovsky K, Rissman RA, Rogalski E, Scheltens P, Sperling RA, Yang H, Yu L, Zetterberg H, Schneider JA (2025) Clinical criteria for limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy. Alzheimers Dement. 10.1002/alz.14202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yushkevich PA, Muñoz López M, Iñiguez De Onzoño Martin MM, Ittyerah R, Lim S, Ravikumar S, Bedard ML, Pickup S, Liu W, Wang J, Hung LY, Lasserve J, Vergnet N, Xie L, Dong M, Cui S, McCollum L, Robinson JL, Schuck T, De Flores R, Grossman M, Tisdall MD, Prabhakaran K, Mizsei G, Das SR, Artacho-Pérula E, Arroyo Jiménez MDM, Marcos Raba MP, Molina Romero FJ, Cebada Sánchez S, Delgado González JC, De La Rosa-Prieto C, Córcoles Parada M, Lee EB, Trojanowski JQ, Ohm DT, Wisse LEM, Wolk DA, Irwin DJ, Insausti R (2021) Three-dimensional mapping of neurofibrillary tangle burden in the human medial temporal lobe. Brain 144:2784–2797. 10.1093/brain/awab262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The ADNI dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available through the LONI Image and Data Archive (IDA), a secure research data repository.






