Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2025 Jun 20;378:107925. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2025.107925

Using Solid-State MRI and a Double-Tuned RF Coil to Quantify Bone Matrix and Mineral Densities in Rat Bones

Victor B Kassey a,b,c, Matthias Walle a, Diana Yeritsyan a, Daniel V Kassey a,c, Yaotang Wu b,c, Brian D Snyder a,b, Edward K Rodriguez a, Jerome L Ackerman c,d, Ara Nazarian a,e
PMCID: PMC12801613  NIHMSID: NIHMS2128358  PMID: 40578137

Abstract

Quantitative information on the composition of bone, specifically the content of calcium phosphate mineral and organic matrix, is essential for accurate diagnosis of metabolic bone diseases such as osteoporosis, osteomalacia, and renal osteodystrophy, as well as for differentiating among these conditions. Conventional MRI fails to provide this information because these substances are solid and, therefore, yield no signal in conventional MRI scans, which typically employ spin or gradient echoes. In this report, we show how phosphorus and proton solid-state MRI yield the desired compositional information in bone specimens with ZTE and WASPI pulse sequences, respectively, coupled with the use of a two-port double-tuned solenoidal RF coil.

Electrical network simulations and construction details of the RF coil are detailed. Electrical performance was simulated using QUCS software to find the circuit component values that minimize reflected power and maximize interport isolation. Phantoms of known composition, as well as ex vivo femurs from normal, low bone density, and vitamin D-deficient rats, were included in the study. A simple correction for B1 inhomogeneity was applied to achieve quantitative accuracy in the image intensity values.

Bone matrix and mineral densities derived from MRI strongly correlated (R2 = 0.84) with chemical analysis, demonstrating the ability to measure compositional differences relevant to osteoporosis and osteomalacia.

Keywords: Solid-state MRI, Bone MRI, Double-tuned single RF coil, Metabolic bone disease, Osteoporosis, Osteomalacia

1. Introduction

Metabolic bone diseases—including osteoporosis, osteomalacia, and renal osteodystrophy (ROD)—impact more than 55 million Americans, contributing to skeletal fragility, chronic pain, deformities, and increased fracture susceptibility [1-3]. These conditions represent a major public health burden, with estimated healthcare costs exceeding $22 billion annually [4].

Metabolic bone diseases include conditions with underlying abnormalities in bone mineralization, formation, resorption, or a combination [5]. Osteoporosis and related metabolic bone diseases have become increasingly prevalent with age and are a current healthcare concern among postmenopausal women and the elderly population, with a global prevalence of 18.3% [6]. On the other hand, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is also associated with metabolic bone diseases, afflicting approximately 10% of the global population. This condition burdens patients with mineral metabolism alterations, resulting in bone abnormalities [7, 8].

Specifically, chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) is a systemic complication of CKD that includes bone turnover, mineralization, volume, linear growth or strength abnormalities, as well as vascular disorders [9]. CKD-MBD involves multiple components in bone metabolism alterations, collectively called renal osteodystrophy [9-11]. ROD can occur in different patterns according to the bone formation process and the cell lines affected. Osteocytes, which represent 95% of all bone cells, occupy the lacunar space and are surrounded by an unmineralized osteoid matrix, becoming important precursors that detect mechanical and metabolic signals to activate either osteoblasts (promoting bone formation) or osteoclasts (promoting bone resorption). In adults, bone tissue requires dynamic remodeling to maintain adequate biomechanical properties, being replaced with new tissue in an organized process orchestrated by multicellular units [12-16]. Hormonal factors, particularly parathyroid hormone (PTH), are critical in regulating calcium, phosphate, vitamin D, and bone metabolism [17]. Extremely high or low PTH levels lead to abnormal bone turnover, causing adynamic bone disease (ABD), osteomalacia, or osteitis fibrosa, all linked to higher mortality and fracture risk [9].

Given the fundamental differences between disorders of bone density (e.g., osteoporosis) and mineralization defects (e.g., osteomalacia, ROD), accurate discrimination between these conditions is crucial for effective clinical management. Currently, diagnosis and screening rely primarily on serum biomarkers and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), yet both modalities present significant limitations [8, 18-25]. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines fracture risk based on areal bone mineral density (aBMD, g·cm−2), as measured by DXA and referenced to a young adult norm. However, aBMD is not a reliable predictor of fracture risk and lacks the specificity to distinguish between different types of bone pathology [26-30].

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers the potential to image both the mineral and matrix phases of bone quantitatively. The obvious choice of MR-active isotopes is 31P and 1H to measure bone mineral and matrix components, respectively [31-33]. Since both phases are solid materials, the MR signals will be characterized by very short T2. Therefore, solid-state short-T2 MRI techniques offer the potential for measuring the mineral and matrix quantitatively and noninvasively to diagnose these diseases and monitor treatment progression [34, 35]. While MRI is well established for soft tissue (long T2s) as a standard diagnostic imaging modality in clinical MRI, bone MRI is at a relatively early development phase due to a lack of suitable techniques for hard tissue (very short T2s), owing to intrinsic short spin-spin relaxation times (T2) resulting in hardware limitations [35, 36]. In bone MRI, the signals are derived from the bone substance—matrix or mineral, where the T2s are unfavorable. Conventional MRI pulse sequences generally employ spin or gradient echoes and require a multiplicity of switched gradients during the signal readout. However, with their very short T2 signals, solid materials preclude magnetic field gradient switching during the signal readout because of the limited speed at which the gradients may be switched. As a result, pulse sequences that do not employ gradient switching during the signal readout are required.

Our team and others have demonstrated the potential of bone matrix imaging, commonly employing a variety of zero echo time radial k-space acquisition techniques such as Water And fat Suppressed Projection Imaging (WASPI), Ultrashort Echo time (UTE), and Zero Echo Time (ZTE) imaging. WASPI in particular was designed to selectively image the short T2 solid-state proton signals in the collagen fibers of the matrix by suppressing free water and fat signals within the tissue with various water and fat suppression techniques [31, 37-39]. Wehrli has likewise used ZTE sequences with long-T2 suppression in a study of cortical bone water [40].

Similarly, solid-state 31P MRI specifically targets and quantifies phosphorus (31P) in bone mineral, and has been tested in preclinical and clinical settings [32, 40-51]. Both 1H and 31P solid-state imaging techniques operate with a single broadband excitation followed by immediate signal acquisition under a static gradient, with successive acquisitions covering k-space in a 3D radial trajectory to detect the short T2 signals in the solid materials. In the case of 1H, the broadband excitation is preceded by chemical shift selective liquid water and fat suppression pulses to suppress these substances while retaining the solid matrix signal. The standard Fourier-domain encoding and reconstruction methods are unsuitable for signals acquired under a static gradient. Alternatively, the radial acquisitions in k-space are remapped onto Cartesian coordinates for Fourier transformation, allowing over-sampling for central k-space and providing sufficient spatial resolution for accurate image reconstruction. Integrating high spatial resolution 3D conventional MRI into the protocol provides detailed analyses of cortical and trabecular structures [52-75], aiding in evaluating bone strength and fracture risk when subjected to impact configurations such as falls [65-69, 76, 77].

Advanced MRI techniques are emerging as powerful tools for evaluating bone health, offering isotope-specific insights into both mineral and organic matrix composition [31, 32, 37-51], where our group has demonstrated the utility of solid-state 1H (proton) and 31P (phosphate) MRI in quantifying bone matrix (MAT) and mineral (MIN) densities, providing precise data on tissue composition. These measurements enable the calculation of the extent of bone mineralization (EBM)—the ratio of MIN to MAT—a critical parameter for distinguishing osteomalacia and ROD from osteoporosis. Importantly, EBM and matrix density are not measurable by DXA, CT, or serum biomarkers, and matrix assessment otherwise requires invasive bone biopsy.

To acquire proton and phosphorus signals, various RF coil designs have been used in multinuclear MR imaging and spectroscopy. For measurements that require the recording of signals from two isotopes from the same specimen or body part, the optimum design choice is for the same coil to excite and acquire the signals of both isotopes to guarantee that the imaged volumes and spatial dependence of the RF fields match at both frequencies.

In this study, we report the performance of a solenoidal double-tuned single RF coil developed for small rat bone specimens at 7T field strength in a preclinical magnet. We used femurs from control, ovariectomized, and partially nephrectomized plus vitamin D-deficient diet Sprague-Dawley rats. The latter two models were used to simulate osteoporosis and osteomalacia.

2. Methods

MRI experiments were performed on a preclinical Bruker 7T, 30 cm horizontal bore MRI scanner (Bruker Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with a 450 mT/m gradient system and Paravision 5.1 and 6.0.1 with approval from the BIDMC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Image post-processing and data analysis were done using an in-house user interface package developed in MATLAB [78].

2.1. Probe-Head Design

Figure 1a shows the mechanical design of the DTSC, based on the design by Cross et al. [79]. The tuning and matching capacitors are adjustable while the coil is in place in the magnet, and their settings are easily reproduced using lockable multi-turn dials with digital readouts.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

a) Mechanical design of the coil. b) QUCS schematic for simulation of the coil tuning circuit. The proton port is on the left (V1), and the phosphorus port is on the right (V2).

2.2. Circuit and S-Parameter Simulations with QUCS

Figure 1b shows the schematic diagram of the tuning and matching circuit for the QUCS (Quite Universal Circuit Simulator) [80] software package that was used to simulate the electrical performance of the coil. The purpose of the simulation was to find a compromise between optimizing the coil performance by maximizing its current, minimizing the reflected power at both ports, and maximizing the inter-port isolation by varying the component values. Equal weight was given to the target optimizations. The resonance frequencies of 1H and 31P were 300.131 MHz and 121.123 MHz, respectively. The C1 and C3 are matching and tuning capacitors (0.8pF - 38pF) of ωHF; C7 and C9 are tuning and matching capacitors (0.8pF - 38pF) of ωLF. The C4, C5 (3.7pF) and C2, C6, C8 (5.6 pF) are fixed capacitors in the symmetric and lumped circuits, respectively, balancing and isolating the two channels, and L2, L3, and L4 are three inductor coils (50 nH) in the three trap circuits.

Figure 2 shows a scattering parameters plot simulated with the QUCS for the double-tuned single coil with excellent isolation between the two frequencies. In the QUCS, the 1H and 31P channels were set to the respective resonance frequencies of 300.131 MHz and 121.123 MHz and matched to 50Ω impedance where S11 = 33.5 and S22 = 34. The blue peaks represent 31P, and the red peaks represent 1H resonance frequencies at 7T. We used commercially available fixed and variable non-magnetic high ‘Q’ capacitors. The values of individual parameters have been chosen depending on their availability. Figure 2 shows excellent isolation between 1H (33.5 dB) and 31P (34dB) resonance frequencies and successful tuning and matching with the following values: C1=1.15 pF, C3=6.8 pF, C7=8.8 pF, and C9=23 pF (Figure 1b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The S-parameters plot obtained using the QUCS simulation program shows excellent isolation between 1H (33.5 dB) and 31P (34dB) resonance frequencies. The blue peaks represent 31P, and the red peaks represent 1H resonance frequencies at 7T.

2.3. Design of PCB and Solenoid Coil

Figure 3 shows the PCB layout designed with the EAGLE freeware (a) and the physical PCB developed in the laboratory (b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

a) The PCB layout for a 7T double-tuned single solenoid coil designed by EAGLE, and b) The PCB was fabricated in the laboratory with all the electronic components.

Given the size of the rat femurs, the dimensions of the solenoid coil, L1 (20 mm length, 10 mm diameter, and four turns), were chosen to accommodate both cortical and trabecular bones with a better filling factor (distal epiphysis of the rat femurs fills 10 mm NMR tube, and the tube fits tightly in the RF coil). The coil was designed with 16-gauge copper wire for mechanical stability and to withstand high-power RF pulses. The coil's inductance (110 nH) was chosen for better isolation between 1H and 31P ports (Figure 1b). All parameters, particularly length, inner and outer diameters of the solenoid coil, the gauge of the copper wire (diameter), and the number of turns, including the coil pitch, were chosen for the best filling factor to achieve optimum SNR in the solid-state 1H and 31P short-T2 rat bone imaging.

2.4. Double-Tuned RF Probe-Head

The probe head was constructed with non-magnetic variable and fixed ceramic, high-Q, low heat, low-noise, and non-magnetic capacitors (Voltronics Corporation, Denville, NJ, USA). The PCB layout was simulated using Easily Applicable Graphical Layout Editor (EAGLE, CadSoft Computer, Germany) [81], fabricated and secured to the body of the probe head with non-magnetic and non-metallic screws in adjustable slots for iso-centering the RF coil in x- and y- directions. The variable tuning and matching capacitors were connected with lockable 4-digit dials to tune and match 1H and 31P channels with two different resonance frequencies (Figure 4b). The 1H and 31P channels coupled to the solenoid coil were connected with high-precision semi-rigid coaxial cables (Huber+Suhner Inc., Herisau, Switzerland) for maximum transmission and reception of RF and MR signals to reduce parasitic capacitance and minimize radiation tendency from the RF coil. The RF coil has detuning circuits with three traps for isolating and enabling transmit-receive operations in the 1H and 31P channels. The design ensures maximum RF delivery to rat femurs without reflected residual power [82].

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

a) Double-tuned single solenoid coil assembly with PCB,1H/31P channels, solenoid coil (b). Lockable 4-digit dials.

2.5. Linearity, Resolution, and B1 Maps with Phantoms

Two sets of three equal-density (1:1:1) polyethylene glycol (PEG), (1H) and hydroxyapatite (HA), (31P) pellets were prepared to evaluate the B1 field of the DTSC and the partial volume effects in 1H and 31P imaging. Another two sets of pellets, one with polyethylene glycol (PEG, representing the organic matrix component of the bone) and the second with hydroxyapatite (HA, representing the mineral component of the bone) in varying mass densities in 1:2:4 ratios, were prepared to check PEG (1H) and HA (31P) pellet image intensities proportional to their physical mass densities. Proton (1H) and phosphorus (31P) B1 maps were obtained with pure water (H2O) and pure hydroxyapatite (HA) phantoms using the ZTE pulse sequences used in rat femur imaging to evaluate the homogeneity of the B1 field. Figure 5 shows coronal, sagittal, and axial profiles of the middle slice of the B1 maps of pure water 1H (top) and pure hydroxyapatite 31P (bottom) phantom images before and after B1 correction applied with B1 correction matrices.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Coronal, sagittal, and axial images of homogeneous water (top) and hydroxyapatite (bottom) phantoms before and after B1 corrections.

2.6. Bone Specimens for Testing and Validation

Rat femurs from skeletally mature female Sprague Dawley (SD) strain (250–275g, 15 weeks old, Charlestown, MA, USA) were chosen and divided into three equally sized groups: control (CON), ovariectomized (OVX), and partially nephrectomized with vitamin D deficient diet (Vit-D). The SD strain is commonly used in musculoskeletal research, and female rats were chosen as osteoporosis is more prevalent in the female sex. The control (CON) group animals were not subjected to surgical or dietary interventions. The animals allocated to the ovariectomized (OVX) group underwent ovariectomy to induce a state of low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration (similar to osteoporosis). The vitamin D-deficient (Vit-D) group animals underwent a 5/6 nephrectomy. Then, they were placed on a modified diet of 0.4% calcium and 0% vitamin D (modified Basal Diet 5755, TestDiet, Richmond, IN, USA) to induce inadequate bone mineralization. All animals were euthanized via CO2 inhalation at 8, 10, and 12 weeks for CON, OVX, and Vit-D groups, respectively. These time points were chosen to ensure a state of reduced bone density and mineralization in the two disease groups, respectively [83, 84].

2.7. 1H and 31P MR Spectroscopy and Imaging on Phantoms and Rat Femurs

1H and 31P MR spectroscopy and imaging studies were conducted on liquid (water and phosphoric acid) and solid (PEG and HA pellets) samples to test DTSC performance. Subsequently, proton (1H) and phosphorus (31P) T1 measurements were carried out on rat femurs with a single pulse (acquisition of free induction decays (FIDs)), a series of progressive saturation, and ZTE imaging sequences (3D radial coverage of k-space) on the 7T preclinical scanner [32, 43, 85]. The signals were averaged over 64 scans for 1H and 128 scans for 31P, with 64 dummy scans in 1H and 31P measurements. Initially, 1H ZTE imaging was performed on rat femurs covering cortical and trabecular bones with water + fat suppression using VAPOR saturation elements added to the 1H ZTE sequence [86]. The short-T2 bone matrix (1H) signals were acquired with optimized TR values computed from the Ernst angle calculations [87]. Rat femur 1H images were obtained with SW = 250,000 Hz, TR = 20 ms, radial projections = 13,030, matrix size = 64 × 64 × 64 and FOV = 30 × 30 × 30, No. of averages (NA) = 8 under a fixed gradient of 170 mT/m with 0.468 mm resolution in 35 minutes. Immediately after completing 1H ZTE imaging, the long-T1 bone mineral (31P) images were acquired with 31P ZTE sequence on the same rat femur with TR = 1000 ms, number of averages (NA) = 2, and the rest of the parameters were the same as 1H ZTE imaging with 0.468 mm resolution, obtained in 7 hours. For quantitative results, an internal dual calibration phantom (DP) was kept in all 1H and 31P rat femur imaging measurements. 1H and 31P ZTE imaging was carried out on cortical and trabecular bones together in all control (CON), ovariectomized (OVX), and vitamin-D deficient (Vit-D) rat femurs to compute bone matrix and mineral densities [88].

2.8. Density Calculations with 3-Density Pellets and Dual Calibration Phantom

The physical and MRI-derived densities of the three-density PEG and HA phantoms and the dual calibration phantom pellets were plotted together, which confirmed linear correlations (rPG2 = 0.99 and rHA2 = 0.97) [78, 86, 88, 89]. Each rat femur specimen's bone matrix density (BMDMAT) was determined by dividing the total sum of the 1H MRI voxel intensities by the total bone volume (TV). Similarly, bone mineral densities (BMD) were computed by dividing the total sum of 31P MRI voxel intensities by the total volume (TV) of the same rat bone. The MRI-derived bone matrix and mineral densities were converted to DP-PEG-HA phantom equivalent mass densities using linear regressions and converted to true bone matrix (MAT) and mineral (MIN) densities [32, 86, 89] to calculate EBM.

2.9. Chemical Analysis

Gold standard chemical analysis was performed on all cortical and trabecular rat bone specimens. Bone tissue volumes were determined using a gas pycnometer (Accupyc 1330, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). The dry bone mass of each specimen was determined by drying it in an oven at 75 °C for 24 hours. Ash mass from each specimen was obtained after they were turned to ash at 600° C to burn off the organic matrix over 96 hours until no change in mass was observed. Tissue mineral density was calculated as the mass of ash divided by the volume of bone tissue (TV) measured from pycnometer studies. Tissue matrix density was calculated as (dry bone mass–ash mass)/TV.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Student’s t-test was used to compare bone matrix and mineral densities from cortical and trabecular bones. Regression analysis and Blan-Altman plotting demonstrated the correlation of EBM values measured from MRI and chemical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (version 9.3.1 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Two-tailed p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. 1H and 31P images with B1 Corrections

The MR image intensities of the three-density PEG and HA phantom pellets were improved with B1 correction, which showed linearity proportional to the weight fraction ratio 1:2:4. Figure 6 shows 1H (a) and 31P (b) 3-density PEG and HA phantom images before (top) and after (bottom) B1 corrections. After B1 correction, PEG (1H) and HA (31P) 3-density pellet image intensities show improved linearity with histograms of the pellet volumes within each ROI before and after B1 corrections, respectively. The B1 corrections improved the linearity of the 3-density phantom image intensities, and the histograms highlighted the B1 effect of enhanced linearity.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Impact of B1 correction on 1H and 31P images. The 3-density PEG (1H) (a) and HA (31P) (b) pellet images and histograms.

3.2. Linearity Tests with Density Pellets

The 3-density PEG (1H) and HA (31P) pellet MRI image intensities acquired by DTSC showed linearity with their physical densities, which confirmed the linearity proportional to the physical densities and the homogeneity of the DTSC B1 field. The MRI-derived densities (DCMi) of the three-density PEG and HA pellets and their physical densities (DCPi) demonstrated significant linear relationships with a strong positive correlation (r2 = 0.99) [90, 91]. In addition, the B1 profiles of the B1 maps obtained with homogenous PEG and HA phantoms confirmed the B1 field homogeneity of the double-tuned solenoid coil [86, 89].

3.3. Co-registration of 1H and 31P Bone Images

Figure 7 shows representative rat femur 1H images with water+fat suppression (left) and 31P images (right) acquired sequentially in a single imaging session at 7T. The two-color images in the middle of the bottom row are rat femur 1H (left) and 31P (right) images of the same transverse slice (ROI) acquired by DTSC with 0.468mm resolution. Notably, DTSC sequentially acquired 1H and 31P rat femur images with exact FOV, matrix size, and spatial resolution to co-register them precisely at any specific 3D spatial location (ROI) (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Top row: 1H images of rat femur with water + fat suppression (left) and 31P images of rat femur (right): coronal and sagittal views. Bottom row: 1H (left) and 31P (right) transverse images of rat femur. The two (color) images in the middle of the bottom row are 1H (left) and 31P (right) images of the same slice (ROI) acquired by the double-tuned single RF coil.

3.4. Quantitative Bone Matrix and Mineral Densities

Rat bone matrix and mineral densities were measured by MRI and chemical analysis. The DTSC facilitated the acquisition of bone matrix and mineral densities from cortical and trabecular bones, providing EBM on any 3D spatial location (ROI) (Figure 7). Bone matrix and mineral densities obtained by MRI and the gold-standard chemical analysis were similar across all femurs and ROIs (p=0.11), demonstrating good agreement with negligible (3-6%) variation. The regression analysis (R2=0.84) and the Bland-Altman plot confirmed a strong correlation between the EBMs derived from MRI and chemical analysis, showcasing DTSC efficacy (Figure 8), while demonstrating data grouping along the regression line.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Regression (top) and Bland-Altman plot (bottom) of rat femur bone Extent of bone mineralization (EBM), measured by chemical analysis and MRI for CON, OVX, and Vit-D specimens.

4. Discussion

This study presents a versatile DTSC probe head for preclinical magnetic resonance imaging at 7T, designed to measure rat bone matrix and mineral densities with the same FOV and matrix size in a single session without interrupting the imaging study. Our results demonstrate the DTSC’s capabilities to provide high spatial resolution with optimum SNR, enabling simultaneous and sequential acquisition of cortical and trabecular bone matrix (1H) and mineral (31P) imaging in a single session. The findings highlight the utility of this technique in advancing non-invasive and quantitative diagnosis of bone health.

The DTSC was engineered with a solenoid coil architecture with high B1 homogeneity optimized for short-T2 rat femur imaging. The lockable 4-digit dials integrated with variable capacitors provide precise tuning and matching for the resonance frequencies. Individual shielding traps in the 1H and 31P channels avoid possible cable resonance without additional decoupling mechanisms. DTSC has excellent isolation of 30dB between the 1H and 31P channels. The isolation of approximately 30 dB ensures minimal crosstalk and maximizes RF transmission efficiency, which is critical for accurately imagining short-T2 and long-T1 1H and 31P MR signals in hard tissue. Unlike conventional dual-coil systems, this double-tuned single-coil approach eliminates discrepancies in field-of-view (FOV) and matrix size, providing precise co-registration of multinuclear (1H/31P or 1H/23Na) images with exact ROI (Figure 7).

Linearity tests using PEG and HA phantoms confirmed the probe head’s sensitivity and efficiency to measure mass density ratios accurately (Figure 6). MR Imaging experiments showed strong correlations between MRI-derived and chemically determined bone matrix and mineral densities, with negligible variance. This accuracy validates the DTSC for quantitative imaging and extends its potential, differentiating between metabolic bone diseases such as osteoporosis and osteomalacia.

By allowing sequential acquisition of solid-state 1H and 31P MRI from the exact same volume and spatial resolution, this system facilitates precise co-registration of bone matrix and mineral signals—an essential advance for studying metabolic bone diseases. For the first time, this standardizable RF coil design supports accurate, quantitative measurements of both bone mineral and organic matrix densities from cortical and trabecular regions in the same imaging session, without repositioning the specimen or compromising signal integrity. This technological integration provides a means to compute the EBM, a composite parameter critical for distinguishing between osteomalacia and osteoporosis. In doing so, it introduces a capability to non-invasively assess the biological state of bone tissue composition. Furthermore, because the probe is engineered for optimal B1 homogeneity, signal linearity, and field matching at both resonance frequencies, it eliminates spatial mismatches that traditionally limited dual-nucleus studies. This improves diagnostic precision in preclinical models and lays the foundation for personalized assessment of skeletal disease progression and response to treatment. The standardized and reproducible RF platform enables high-throughput studies across experimental models, extending the biological utility of solid-state MRI beyond basic research to translational and potentially clinical domains. This unified coil architecture fundamentally redefines how bone health and mineralization disorders can be noninvasively studied and characterized in vivo.

The DTSC’s capability to measure bone matrix and mineral densities from the same region of interest enhances diagnostic precision. By acquiring 1H and 31P images sequentially in the same scanning session and the RF probe head without needing to change or reposition samples, the DTSC reduces scan time and improves workflow efficiency.

While DTSC demonstrated excellent performance in preclinical settings, challenges remain in adapting this technology for in vivo studies. The solenoid coil’s orientation requirements limit its use in superconducting MRI systems. Birdcage or array coils are required for the larger volumes of live animal and human imaging.

5. Conclusions

This study establishes the feasibility of solid-state MRI for quantitative bone imaging of small specimens, offering significant advancements in preclinical and potentially clinical diagnostics. By providing precise measurements of bone matrix and mineral densities, the technology represents a transformative tool for understanding bone health and addressing the global burden of metabolic bone diseases.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the National Institutes of Health (AN: K99/R00 AR057093; JA: R01 AR075077) and internal grants from the Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, BIDMC (EKR), and Boston Children’s Hospital Orthopaedic Surgery Foundation (BDS). The Small Animal Imaging Facilities at Boston Children’s Hospital and the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital supported the MR imaging work for this project.

Abbreviations

1H

Hydrogen or proton

31P

Phosphorus

2D

Two Dimensional

3D

Three Dimensional

B0

Main Magnetic Field

B1

Magnetic field generated by RF coil

BMD

Bone Mineral Density

C

Calibration /Cortical

0C

Centigrade (temperature)

CF

Conversion Factor

cm

Centimeter

CO2

Carbone dioxide

CON

Control

CON-Cort

Control-Cortical (Bone)

CON-Trab

Control-Trabecular (Bone)

cROI

cortical Region Of Interest

D

Density

DXA

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

EBM

Extent of bone mineralization

C

Chemical

HA

Hydroxyapatite

kHz

Kilohertz

MATLAB

Matrix Laboratory software program

mg

Milligram

mm

Millimeter

MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ms

milliseconds

mn

mineral

mx

matrix

nH

nano henry (capacitance)

μCT

Micro-computed tomography

μs

Microseconds

OM

Osteomalacia

OP

Osteoporosis

OVX

Ovariectomized

OVX-Cort

Ovariectomized-Cortical (Bone)

OVX-Trab

Ovariectomized-Trabecular (Bone)

PEG

Polyethylene glycol

pF

pico-farad

RF

Radio Frequency

ROI

Region of Interest

SNR

Signal-to-noise ratio

T

Tesla (magnetic field strength)/True

T1

Spin-lattice relaxation time

T2

Spin-Spin relaxation time

TV

Tissue Volume (bone)

VAPOR

VAriable Power RF pulses with Optimized Relaxation delays

Vit-D

Vitamin D deficient

Vit-D-Cort

Vitamin D deficient-Cortical (Bone)

Vit-D-Trab

Vitamin D deficient-Trabecular (Bone)

ZTE

Zero Time Echo/Zero Echo Time

Footnotes

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors have no interest in disclosing information pertaining to this work.

Declaration of Generative AI in Scientific Writing

While preparing this work, the authors used no generative AI tools.

References

  • [1].Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A, Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025, J Bone Miner Res, 22 (2007) 465–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Kling JM, Clarke BL, Sandhu NP, Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review, J Womens Health (Larchmt), 23 (2014) 563–572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Sozen T, Ozisik L, Basaran NC, An overview and management of osteoporosis, Eur J Rheumatol, 4 (2017) 46–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Ford JC, Wehrli FW, In vivo quantitative characterization of trabecular bone by NMR interferometry and localized proton spectroscopy, Magn Reson Med, 17 (1991) 543–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].El Demellawy D, Davila J, Shaw A, Nasr Y, Brief Review on Metabolic Bone Disease, Acad Forensic Pathol, 8 (2018) 611–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Salari N, Darvishi N, Bartina Y, Larti M, Kiaei A, Hemmati M, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M, Global prevalence of osteoporosis among the world older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, J Orthop Surg Res, 16 (2021) 669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Aguilar A, Gifre L, Urena-Torres P, Carrillo-Lopez N, Rodriguez-Garcia M, Masso E, da Silva I, Lopez-Baez V, Sanchez-Baya M, Prior-Espanol A, Urrutia M, Paul J, Bustos MC, Vila A, Garnica-Leon I, Navarro-Gonzalez JF, Mateo L, Bover J, Pathophysiology of bone disease in chronic kidney disease: from basics to renal osteodystrophy and osteoporosis, Front Physiol, 14 (2023) 1177829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Malluche HH, Porter DS, Pienkowski D, Evaluating bone quality in patients with chronic kidney disease, Nat Rev Nephrol, 9 (2013) 671–680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].C.K.D.M.B.D.U.W.G. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes, KDIGO 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD), Kidney Int Suppl (2011), 7 (2017) 1–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Llach F, Fernandez E, Overview of renal bone disease: causes of treatment failure, clinical observations, the changing pattern of bone lesions, and future therapeutic approach, Kidney Int Suppl, (2003) S113–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Hruska KA, Sugatani T, Agapova O, Fang Y, The chronic kidney disease - Mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD): Advances in pathophysiology, Bone, 100 (2017) 80–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Bonewald LF, Osteocytes as dynamic multifunctional cells, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1116 (2007) 281–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Bonewald LF, Johnson ML, Osteocytes, mechanosensing and Wnt signaling, Bone, 42 (2008) 606–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J, Smit TH, Strain-derived canalicular fluid flow regulates osteoclast activity in a remodelling osteon--a proposal, J Biomech, 36 (2003) 1453–1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Katsimbri P, The biology of normal bone remodelling, Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 26 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Martin TJ, Sims NA, Osteoclast-derived activity in the coupling of bone formation to resorption, Trends Mol Med, 11 (2005) 76–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Jang MG, Lee JY, Yang JY, Park H, Kim JH, Kim JE, Shin CS, Kim SY, Kim SW, Intermittent PTH treatment can delay the transformation of mature osteoblasts into lining cells on the periosteal surfaces, J Bone Miner Metab, 34 (2016) 532–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Dousdampanis P, Trigka K, The importance of bone biopsy in chronic kidney disease-Mineral bone disorders, Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl, 28 (2017) 992–996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Eastell R, Hannon RA, Biomarkers of bone health and osteoporosis risk, Proc Nutr Soc, 67 (2008) 157–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Qaseem A, Snow V, Owens DK, Shekelle P, Clinical P Guidelines Committee of the American College of, The development of clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements of the American College of Physicians: summary of methods, Ann Intern Med, 153 (2010) 194–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Jergas M, Breitenseher M, Gluer CC, Yu W, Genant HK, Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry, J Bone Miner Res, 10 (1995) 1101–1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Bolotin HH, DXA in vivo BMD methodology: an erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling, Bone, 41 (2007) 138–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Bolotin HH, Sievanen H, Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral density can seriously mislead diagnostic/prognostic interpretations of patient-specific bone fragility, J Bone Miner Res, 16 (2001) 799–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Leonard MB, Propert KJ, Zemel BS, Stallings VA, Feldman HI, Discrepancies in pediatric bone mineral density reference data: potential for misdiagnosis of osteopenia, J Pediatr, 135 (1999) 182–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Bachrach LK, Osteoporosis and measurement of bone mass in children and adolescents, Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 34 (2005) 521–535, vii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Cho G, Wu Y, Ackerman JL, Detection of hydroxyl ions in bone mineral by solid-state NMR spectroscopy, Science, 300 (2003) 1123–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Chrischilles EA, Butler CD, Davis CS, Wallace RB, A model of lifetime osteoporosis impact, Arch Intern Med, 151 (1991) 2026–2032. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Hong J, Hipp JA, Mulkern RV, Jaramillo D, Snyder BD, Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of bone density and cross-sectional geometry, Calcif Tissue Int, 66 (2000) 74–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Jara H, Wehrli FW, Chung H, Ford JC, High-resolution variable flip angle 3D MR imaging of trabecular microstructure in vivo, Magn Reson Med, 29 (1993) 528–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd, The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology, Bone, 17 (1995) 505S–511S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Wu Y, Dai G, Ackerman JL, Hrovat MI, Glimcher MJ, Snyder BD, Nazarian A, Chesler DA, Water- and fat-suppressed proton projection MRI (WASPI) of rat femur bone, Magn Reson Med, 57 (2007) 554–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Cao H, Nazarian A, Ackerman JL, Snyder BD, Rosenberg AE, Nazarian RM, Hrovat MI, Dai G, Mintzopoulos D, Wu Y, Quantitative (31)P NMR spectroscopy and (1)H MRI measurements of bone mineral and matrix density differentiate metabolic bone diseases in rat models, Bone, 46 (2010) 1582–1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Cao H, Ackerman JL, Graham L, Glimcher MJ, Wu Y, Quantitative bone matrix density measured by water and fat suppressed proton projection MRI (WASPI) using a polymer phantom. , in: Joint Annual Meeting, International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology, Berlin, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Westbrook C, Roth C, Talbot J, MRI in Practice, Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Wehrli FW, Magnetic resonance of calcified tissues, J Magn Reson, 229 (2013) 35–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Seifert AC, Wehrli FW, Solid-State Quantitative (1)H and (31)P MRI of Cortical Bone in Humans, Curr Osteoporos Rep, 14 (2016) 77–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Wu Y, Ackerman JL, Chesler DA, Graham L, Wang Y, Glimcher MJ, Density of organic matrix of native mineralized bone measured by water- and fat-suppressed proton projection MRI, Magn Reson Med, 50 (2003) 59–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Cao H, Nazarian A, Ackerman JL, Snyder BD, Rosenberg AE, Nazarian RM, Hrovat MI, Dai G, Glimcher MJ, Quantitative 31P NMR spectroscopy and 1H MRI measurements of bone mineral and matrix density differentiate metabolic bone diseases in rat models, Bone, Under review (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Wu Y, Hrovat MI, Ackerman JL, Reese TG, Cao H, Ecklund K, Glimcher MJ, Bone matrix imaged in vivo by water- and fat-suppressed proton projection MRI (WASPI) of animal and human subjects, J Magn Reson Imaging, 31 (2010) 954–963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Jones BC, Lee H, Cheng CC, Al Mukaddam M, Song HK, Snyder PJ, Kamona N, Rajapakse CS, Wehrli FW, MRI Quantification of Cortical Bone Porosity, Mineralization, and Morphologic Structure in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, Radiology, 307 (2023) e221810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Wu Y, Ackerman JL, Chesler DA, Li J, Neer RM, Wang J, Glimcher MJ, Evaluation of bone mineral density using three-dimensional solid state phosphorus-31 NMR projection imaging, Calcif Tissue Int, 62 (1998) 512–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Wu Y, Chesler DA, Glimcher MJ, Garrido L, Wang J, Jiang HJ, Ackerman JL, Multinuclear solid-state three-dimensional MRI of bone and synthetic calcium phosphates, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96 (1999) 1574–1578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Wu Y, Reese TG, Cao H, Hrovat MI, Toddes SP, Lemdiasov RA, Ackerman JL, Bone mineral imaged in vivo by 31P solid state MRI of human wrists, J Magn Reson Imaging, 34 (2011) 623–633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Ackerman JL, Wu Y, Reese TG, Cao H, Hrovat MI, Toddes SP, Lemdiasov RA, In vivo 31P solid state MRI of human wrists: short-T2 MRI using the scanner 1H channel, in: Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, 2011, pp. 427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Anumula S, Magland J, Wehrli S, Zhang H, Ong H, Song H, Wehrli F, Measurement of phosphorus content in normal and osteomalacic rabbit bone by solid-state 3D radial imaging, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 56 (2006) 946–952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Seifert AC, Li C, Rajapakse CS, Bashoor-Zadeh M, Bhagat YA, Wright AC, Zemel BS, Zavaliangos A, Wehrli FW, Bone mineral 31P and matrix-bound water densities measured by solid-state 31P and 1H MRI, NMR in Biomedicine, 27 (2014) 739–748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Zhao X, Song HK, Seifert AC, Li C, Wehrli FW, Feasibility of assessing bone matrix and mineral properties in vivo by combined solid-state 1H and 31P MRI, PLoS One, 12 (2017) e0173995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Seifert AC, Wright AC, Wehrli SL, Ong HH, Li C, Wehrli FW, 31P NMR relaxation of cortical bone mineral at multiple magnetic field strengths and levels of demineralization, NMR Biomed, 26 (2013) 1158–1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Robson MD, Gatehouse PD, Bydder GM, Neubauer S, Human imaging of phosphorus in cortical and trabecular bone in vivo, Magn Reson Med, 51 (2004) 888–892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Wu Y, Ackerman J, Chesler D, Wang J, Glimcher M, In vivo solid state 31P MRI of human tibia at 1.5 T, in: Proc 7th Annual Meeting ISMRM (Philadelphia), ISMRM Berkeley, CA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Ackerman JL, Raleigh DP, Glimcher MJ, Phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance imaging of hydroxyapatite: a model for bone imaging, Magn Reson Med, 25 (1992) 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Griffin LM, Honig S, Chen C, Saha PK, Regatte R, Chang G, 7T MRI of distal radius trabecular bone microarchitecture: How trabecular bone quality varies depending on distance from end-of-bone, J Magn Reson Imaging, 45 (2017) 872–878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Carballido-Gamio J, Majumdar S, Clinical utility of microarchitecture measurements of trabecular bone, Curr Osteoporos Rep, 4 (2006) 64–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Wehrli FW, Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging, J Magn Reson Imaging, 25 (2007) 390–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Majumdar S, Kothari M, Augat P, Newitt DC, Link TM, Lin JC, Lang T, Lu Y, Genant HK, High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties, Bone, 22 (1998) 445–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Genant HK, Gordon C, Jiang Y, Link TM, Hans D, Majumdar S, Lang TF, Advanced imaging of the macrostructure and microstructure of bone, Horm Res, 54 Suppl 1 (2000) 24–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Wehrli FW, Saha PK, Gomberg BR, Song HK, Snyder PJ, Benito M, Wright A, Weening R, Role of magnetic resonance for assessing structure and function of trabecular bone, Top Magn Reson Imaging, 13 (2002) 335–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Magland JF, Wehrli FW, Trabecular bone structure analysis in the limited spatial resolution regime of in vivo MRI, Academic radiology, 15 (2008) 1482–1493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Genant HK, Majumdar S, High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure, Osteoporos Int, 7 Suppl 3 (1997) S135–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Techawiboonwong A, Song HK, Magland JF, Saha PK, Wehrli FW, Implications of pulse sequence in structural imaging of trabecular bone, J Magn Reson Imaging, 22 (2005) 647–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Banerjee S, Choudhury S, Han ET, Brau AC, Morze CV, Vigneron DB, Majumdar S, Autocalibrating parallel imaging of in vivo trabecular bone microarchitecture at 3 Tesla, Magn Reson Med, 56 (2006) 1075–1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Magland J, Vasilic B, Wehrli FW, Fast low-angle dual spin-echo (FLADE): a new robust pulse sequence for structural imaging of trabecular bone, Magn Reson Med, 55 (2006) 465–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Krug R, Carballido-Gamio J, Burghardt AJ, Kazakia G, Hyun BH, Jobke B, Banerjee S, Huber M, Link TM, Majumdar S, Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo, Osteoporos Int, 19 (2008) 653–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Siffert RS, Luo GM, Cowin SC, Kaufman JJ, Dynamic relationships of trabecular bone density, architecture, and strength in a computational model of osteopenia, Bone, 18 (1996) 197–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Newitt DC, van Rietbergen B, Majumdar S, Processing and analysis of in vivo high-resolution MR images of trabecular bone for longitudinal studies: reproducibility of structural measures and micro-finite element analysis derived mechanical properties, Osteoporos Int, 13 (2002) 278–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Hwang SN, Wehrli FW, Williams JL, Probability-based structural parameters from three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance images as predictors of trabecular bone strength, Med Phys, 24 (1997) 1255–1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Zhang N, Magland JF, Rajapakse CS, Lam SB, Wehrli FW, Assessment of trabecular bone yield and post-yield behavior from high-resolution MRI-based nonlinear finite element analysis at the distal radius of premenopausal and postmenopausal women susceptible to osteoporosis, Acad Radiol, 20 (2013) 1584–1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Ouyang X, Selby K, Lang P, Engelke K, Klifa C, Fan B, Zucconi F, Hottya G, Chen M, Majumdar S, Genant HK, High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the calcaneus: age-related changes in trabecular structure and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements, Calcif Tissue Int, 60 (1997) 139–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Sharma GB, Robertson DD, Laney DA, Gambello MJ, Terk M, Machine learning based analytics of micro-MRI trabecular bone microarchitecture and texture in type 1 Gaucher disease, J Biomech, 49 (2016) 1961–1968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Link TM, Majumdar S, Grampp S, Guglielmi G, van Kuijk C, Imhof H, Glueer C, Adams JE, Imaging of trabecular bone structure in osteoporosis, Eur Radiol, 9 (1999) 1781–1788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Pothuaud L, Porion P, Lespessailles E, Benhamou CL, Levitz P, A new method for three-dimensional skeleton graph analysis of porous media: application to trabecular bone microarchitecture, J Microsc, 199 (2000) 149–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Wehrli FW, Gomberg BR, Saha PK, Song HK, Hwang SN, Snyder PJ, Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis, J Bone Miner Res, 16 (2001) 1520–1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Laib A, Newitt DC, Lu Y, Majumdar S, New model-independent measures of trabecular bone structure applied to in vivo high-resolution MR images, Osteoporos Int, 13 (2002) 130–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Jinnai H, Watashiba H, Kajihara T, Nishikawa Y, Takahashi M, Ito M, Surface curvatures of trabecular bone microarchitecture, Bone, 30 (2002) 191–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Sornay-Rendu E, Boutroy S, Munoz F, Delmas PD, Alterations of cortical and trabecular architecture are associated with fractures in postmenopausal women, partially independent of decreased BMD measured by DXA: the OFELY study, J Bone Miner Res, 22 (2007) 425–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Chang G, Rajapakse CS, Diamond M, Honig S, Recht MP, Weiss DS, Regatte RR, Micro-finite element analysis applied to high-resolution MRI reveals improved bone mechanical competence in the distal femur of female pre-professional dancers, Osteoporos Int, 24 (2013) 1407–1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Court-Brown CM, Age-related changes in the compressive strength of cancellous bone. The relative importance of changes in density and trabecular architecture, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 79 (1997) 421–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].V K, M W, J E, D Y, Y W, BD S, E R, JL A, A N, A Versatile MRI Post-Processing Package with Graphical User Interface in MATLAB, in: ENC Conference, Florida, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • [79].VR C, RK H, JS W, Single coil probe with transmission-line tuning for nuclear magnetic double-resonance, Review of Scientific Instrument, 47 (1976). [Google Scholar]
  • [80].QUCS “Quite Universal Circuit Simulator”, in.
  • [81].EAGLE (Easily Applicable Graphical Layout Editor), in, pp. CadSoft Computer, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • [82].V K, J E, Y W, B S, E R, J A, A N, Design and Development of a Versatile Double Tuned RF Probe Head Coil for Quantification of Bone Mineral and Matrix, in: The Annual Meeting of Orthopedic Research Society, New Orleans, LA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Yousefzadeh N, Kashfi K, Jeddi S, Ghasemi A, Ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis: a practical guide, EXCLI J, 19 (2020) 89–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].de Braganca AC, Canale D, Goncalves JG, Shimizu MHM, Seguro AC, Volpini RA, Vitamin D Deficiency Aggravates the Renal Features of Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease in 5/6 Nephrectomized Rats, Front Med (Lausanne), 5 (2018) 282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Weiger M, Stampanoni M, Pruessmann KP, Direct depiction of bone microstructure using MRI with zero echo time, Bone, 54 (2013) 44–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Kassey VB, Walle M, Egan J, Yeritsyan D, Beeram I, Kassey SP, Wu Y, Snyder BD, Rodriguez EK, Ackerman JL, Nazarian A, Quantitative (1)H Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Normal and Pathologic Rat Bones by Solid-State (1)H ZTE Sequence with Water and Fat Suppression, J Magn Reson Imaging, 60 (2024) 2423–2432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].RR E, G B, A W, Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • [88].V K, M W, J E, Y W, B S, E R, J A, A N, A Combined Solid-State 1H and 31P Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Bone Mineral and Matrix Densities in Rat bones, in: ISMRM, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Kassey VB, Walle M, Egan J, Yeritsyan D, Beeram I, Wu Y, Snyder BD, Rodriguez EK, Ackerman JL, Nazarian A, Quantitative (31)P magnetic resonance imaging on pathologic rat bones by ZTE at 7T, Bone, 180 (2024) 116996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Webb AG, Grant SC, Signal-to-noise and magnetic susceptibility trade-offs in solenoidal microcoils for NMR, J Magn Reson B, 113 (1996) 83–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Lee HS, Woo DC, Min KH, Kim YK, Lee HK, Choe BY, Development of a solenoid RF coil for animal imaging in 3 T high-magnetic-field MRI, Scanning, 30 (2008) 419–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES