Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
letter
. 2005 Nov;49(11):4807–4808. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.11.4807-4808.2005

Mutations Conferring Drug Resistance in Malaria Parasite Drug Transporters Pgh1 and PfCRT Do Not Affect Steady-State Vacuolar Ca2+

Giancarlo A Biagini 1,*, David A Fidock 1, Patrick G Bray 1, Stephen A Ward 1
PMCID: PMC1280173  PMID: 16251339

Resistance to chloroquine (CQ) by the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum has been observed in every region where P. falciparum occurs (20). The exact mode of action of CQ has not been fully elucidated, but it is generally accepted that a crucial step in this process is the binding of the drug to ferriprotoporphyrin IX (heme), a by-product of hemoglobin degradation which occurs in the parasite digestive food vacuole (DV).

A number of studies have contributed to pinpointing the pfcrt gene as the major determinant of CQ resistance (1, 3, 4, 6, 14, 15, 17-19). In addition, mutations of the pfmdr1 gene (expressing Pgh1) have been shown to modulate the level of CQ resistance (11), as well as being partially responsible for the acquired resistance to other drugs such as mefloquine (10). Currently there are two hypotheses as to the function of PfCRT in CQ resistance. The first of these proposes that PfCRT actively removes CQ from the DV, either as an ATP-dependent pump or as a secondary active transporter (12, 13). Alternatively, the “charged drug leak model” proposes that diprotonated CQ (CQ++) leaves the DV via mutated PfCRT passively down its concentration gradient (5). Both theories are in agreement, however, that CQ is transported out of the DV and that this is the key mechanism of CQ resistance.

Little is known of the functional role of the PfCRT transporter in P. falciparum physiology. PfCRT is localized to the DV membrane (4), and bioinformatic studies indicate that PfCRT is a member of the drug/metabolite transporter superfamily (7, 16), other members of which are known to transport a variety of substrates, including amino acids, weak bases, and organic cations. Studies which have heterologously expressed PfCRT into yeast (Pichia pastoris) (21) and Xenopus oocytes (9) have suggested that PfCRT is able to modulate host transport systems. In yeast, PfCRT is reported to function in the passive movement of Cl (21), while in the Xenopus system, PfCRT-expressing oocytes exhibit a depolarized membrane potential (Ψm) and a higher intracellular pH (pHi) compared to control oocytes (9). One possibility is that PfCRT interferes with second messengers such as Ca2+ (9). In addition, Ca2+ channel blockers such as verapamil are believed to block PfCRT, resulting in a chemosensitization of CQ-resistant parasites (for examples, see references 5 and 8). Given that the DV of P. falciparum has been shown to contain elevated levels of free Ca2+ relative to the cytosol (2), this study was undertaken to determine whether PfCRT has a role in DV Ca2+ homeostasis.

The resting concentrations of free DV Ca2+ ([Ca2+]DV) from a number of P. falciparum isolates and allelically exchanged pfcrt and pfmdr1 strains (14) were measured. Measurements were carried out using confocal laser-scanning single-cell imaging as described before (2), with the exception that Fluo 5AM was used in preference to Fluo 4AM due to its higher Kd for Ca2+. In addition, in situ [Ca2+]DV calibrations were carried out on erythrocyte-free parasites, as nigericin induces parasites to exit from their host cell. Results shown in Table 1 show that the measured [Ca2+]DV of all the strains was in the region of 2 μM. These values are a little higher than those reported previously (∼0.4 μM) and probably reflect the higher external [Ca2+] experienced by free parasites (in RPMI medium) compared to the lower [Ca2+] experienced by the intraerythrocytic parasites measured previously (2). There was, however, no correlation between the steady-state [Ca2+]DV values and the CQ sensitivity status of the various Plasmodium strains.

TABLE 1.

Resting vacuolar Ca2+ concentration of P. falciparum strains with various chloroquine sensitivities

Straina CQ 50% inhibitory concn (nM)b Verapamil effectc Resting vacuolar [Ca2+] (μM)b
TM6 93 ± 7 Yes 1.68 ± 0.97
3D7 8 ± 2 No 2.34 ± 0.35
C3Dd2 50 ± 3 Yes 1.84 ± 0.71
C2GCO3 10 ± 3 No 1.93 ± 0.28
D10D10 23 ± 2 No 1.95 ± 0.10
D107G8 16 ± 2 No 2.12 ± 0.60
a

TM6 is a laboratory-adapted CQ-resistant strain; 3D7 is a laboratory-adapted CQ-sensitive strain. In clone C3dd2, the pfcrt allele of a CQ-sensitive clone (GCO3) has been replaced by the pfcrt allele of the CQ-resistant clone Dd2 (14). In clone C2GCO3, the sensitive pfcrt allele from a CQ-sensitive clone has been replaced by another CQ-sensitive pfcrt allele (14) (as a control for any basal effect of pfcrt allelic exchange). In clone D10D10, the pfmdr allele from a CQ-sensitive isolate (D10) was replaced by the pfmdr allele from the same CQ-sensitive clone (11). In clone D107G8, the pfmdr allele from a CQ-sensitive clone (D10) was replaced with a pfmdr allele from a CQ-resistant clone (7G8) (11).

b

Values represent means ± standard error from at least three independent measurements.

c

Ability of verapamil (5 μM) to chemosensitize the parasite clone to CQ (8).

We conclude that mutations in pfcrt or pfmdr1, conferring drug resistance, do not affect the [Ca2+]DV. We further propose that it is unlikely therefore that the functional role of PfCRT is connected to Ca2+ homeostasis, unless redundancy in the pathways maintaining DV Ca2+ homeostasis masked any effect on this process conferred by PfCRT.

Acknowledgments

G.A.B. is supported by an Early Career Leverhulme Trust Fellowship. P.G.B. and S.A.W. are supported by BBSRC, MRC, and Wellcome Trust grants.

We thank staff and patients of Ward 7Y and the Gastroenteritis Unit, Royal Liverpool Hospital, for their generous donation of blood.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Basco, L. K., and P. Ringwald. 2001. Analysis of the key pfcrt point mutation and in vitro and in vivo response to chloroquine in Yaounde, Cameroon. J. Infect. Dis. 183:1828-1831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Biagini, G. A., P. G. Bray, D. G. Spiller, M. R. White, and S. A. Ward. 2003. The digestive food vacuole of the malaria parasite is a dynamic intracellular Ca2+ store. J. Biol. Chem. 278:27910-27915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen, N., B. Russell, J. Staley, B. Kotecka, P. Nasveld, and Q. Cheng. 2001. Sequence polymorphisms in pfcrt are strongly associated with chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. J. Infect. Dis. 183:1543-1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fidock, D. A., T. Nomura, A. K. Talley, R. A. Cooper, S. M. Dzekunov, M. T. Ferdig, L. M. Ursos, A. B. Sidhu, B. Naude, K. W. Deitsch, X. Z. Su, J. C. Wootton, P. D. Roepe, and T. E. Wellems. 2000. Mutations in the P. falciparum digestive vacuole transmembrane protein PfCRT and evidence for their role in chloroquine resistance. Mol. Cell 6:861-871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Johnson, D. J., D. A. Fidock, M. Mungthin, V. Lakshmanan, A. B. Sidhu, P. G. Bray, and S. A. Ward. 2004. Evidence for a central role for PfCRT in conferring Plasmodium falciparum resistance to diverse antimalarial agents. Mol. Cell 15:867-877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lakshmanan, V., P. G. Bray, D. Verdier-Pinard, D. J. Johnson, P. Horrocks, R. A. Muhle, G. E. Alakpa, R. H. Hughes, S. A. Ward, D. J. Krogstad, A. B. Sidhu, and D. A. Fidock. 2005. A critical role for PfCRT K76T in Plasmodium falciparum verapamil-reversible chloroquine resistance. EMBO J. 24:2294-2305. (First published 9 June 2005; doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600681.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Martin, R. E., and K. Kirk. 2004. The malaria parasite's chloroquine resistance transporter is a member of the drug/metabolite transporter superfamily. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1938-1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Martin, S. K., A. M. Oduola, and W. K. Milhous. 1987. Reversal of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum by verapamil. Science 235:899-901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nessler, S., O. Friedrich, N. Bakouh, R. H. Fink, C. P. Sanchez, G. Planelles, and M. Lanzer. 2004. Evidence for activation of endogenous transporters in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter, PfCRT. J. Biol. Chem. 279:39438-39446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Price, R. N., A. C. Uhlemann, A. Brockman, R. McGready, E. Ashley, L. Phaipun, R. Patel, K. Laing, S. Looareesuwan, N. J. White, F. Nosten, and S. Krishna. 2004. Mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and increased pfmdr1 gene copy number. Lancet 364:438-447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reed, M. B., K. J. Saliba, S. R. Caruana, K. Kirk, and A. F. Cowman. 2000. Pgh1 modulates sensitivity and resistance to multiple antimalarials in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 403:906-909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sanchez, C. P., J. E. McLean, W. Stein, and M. Lanzer. 2004. Evidence for a substrate specific and inhibitable drug efflux system in chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum strains. Biochemistry 43:16365-16373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sanchez, C. P., W. Stein, and M. Lanzer. 2003. Trans stimulation provides evidence for a drug efflux carrier as the mechanism of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Biochemistry 42:9383-9394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sidhu, A. B., D. Verdier-Pinard, and D. A. Fidock. 2002. Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites conferred by pfcrt mutations. Science 298:210-213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Su, X., M. T. Ferdig, Y. Huang, C. Q. Huynh, A. Liu, J. You, J. C. Wootton, and T. E. Wellems. 1999. A genetic map and recombination parameters of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Science 286:1351-1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tran, C. V., and M. H. Saier, Jr. 2004. The principal chloroquine resistance protein of Plasmodium falciparum is a member of the drug/metabolite transporter superfamily. Microbiology 150:1-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Walker-Jonah, A., S. A. Dolan, R. W. Gwadz, L. J. Panton, and T. E. Wellems. 1992. An RFLP map of the Plasmodium falciparum genome, recombination rates and favored linkage groups in a genetic cross. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 51:313-320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wellems, T. E., L. J. Panton, I. Y. Gluzman, V. E. do Rosario, R. W. Gwadz, A. Walker-Jonah, and D. J. Krogstad. 1990. Chloroquine resistance not linked to mdr-like genes in a Plasmodium falciparum cross. Nature 345:253-255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wellems, T. E., A. Walker-Jonah, and L. J. Panton. 1991. Genetic mapping of the chloroquine-resistance locus on Plasmodium falciparum chromosome 7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3382-3386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wongsrichanalai, C., A. L. Pickard, W. H. Wernsdorfer, and S. R. Meshnick. 2002. Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2:209-218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang, D., W. Pan, D. Lu, and L. Jiang. 2002. Synthesis and expression of 42 kD C-terminal region of the major merozoite surface protein (MSP1-42) of P. falciparum 3D7 strain in Pichia pastoris. Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi 82:198-202. (In Chinese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES