Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2025 Sep 28:2025.09.26.678370. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2025.09.26.678370

Parkinson’s disease LRRK2 mutations dysregulate iron homeostasis and promote oxidative stress and ferroptosis in human neurons and astrocytes

Adamantios Mamais 1,*, Richard D Batchelor Jr 1, Aravindraja Chairmandurai 1, Nitya Subrahmanian 1, Nunziata Maio 2, Christopher D Vulpe 3, Matthew J LaVoie 1,*
PMCID: PMC12802402  PMID: 41542458

Abstract

Background:

Iron accumulation is a hallmark of sporadic and familial Parkinson’s disease (PD) pathology and correlates with clinical motor symptom severity. The biochemical mechanisms driving iron dyshomeostasis in PD brain and whether these are early or late event in the neurodegenerative process remain unknown. Elevated nigral iron levels have been reported in LRRK2 mutation carriers, both in PD patients compared to idiopathic PD and in asymptomatic carriers relative to controls, suggesting that iron accumulation precedes clinical onset in LRRK2-associated PD. However, the precise consequence of pathogenic LRRK2 mutations on cellular iron handling within neurons and glial cells remains unclear.

Methods:

Here, we investigated different readouts of iron homeostasis in iPSCs and iPSC-derived neurons and astrocytes from PD patients harboring G2019S or R1441C/G LRRK2 mutations or healthy controls, as well as an isogenic iPSC panel with the same variants. By using high-content and super-resolution microscopy of iron-specific probes, we assayed iron content and distribution in cells and examined the downstream effects of iron dyshomeostasis on ferroptosis signaling.

Results:

We show that heterozygous LRRK2 mutations dysregulate cellular iron across iPSCs, neurons and astrocytes, in a kinase-dependent manner. Lysosomal ferrous iron storage was consistently elevated across iPSCs, iPSC-derived neurons and astrocytes carrying LRRK2 mutations. LRRK2 regulates Rab GTPase function through their direct phosphorylation, and our prior work revealed significant but divergent lysosomal phenotypes between Rab8a and Rab10 knockout models. Here, we report that Rab8a knockout recapitulates key aspects of LRRK2 mutation phenotypes on intracellular iron and ferritin levels, although with differences in magnitude and specificity. By contrast, Rab10 deficiency showed opposing effects, suggesting distinct roles for these well-established LRRK2 substrates in iron homeostasis. Finally, we show that basal lipid peroxidation and ROS levels are elevated in isogenic LRRK2 mutant neurons, while iron chelation was sufficient to reduce LRRK2-dependent ROS.

Conclusions:

Together, our findings demonstrate that LRRK2 mutations disrupt iron homeostasis across disease-relevant cell types and establish a discrete biochemical pathway linking LRRK2 signaling and vulnerability to ferroptosis. Ongoing work aims to further dissect the roles of Rab substrates in these pathways.

Keywords: LRRK2, Parkinson’s disease, iron, lysosomes, ferroptosis, Rab8a, iPSC, neurons, astrocytes

Background

Iron accumulation in the substantia nigra is a well-recognized pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD), observed in both sporadic and familial forms of the disorder and in other neurodegenerative conditions17. This iron overload correlates with neuromelanin loss in post-mortem PD brains8 and is detectable in vivo through advanced MRI techniques, such as quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), where iron deposition in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) has been correlated with motor symptom severity9. Notably, iron-sensitive imaging aids in distinguishing PD from other parkinsonian syndromes such as multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP)1013. Despite decades of evidence linking iron dyshomeostasis to PD pathogenesis, the molecular underpinnings that drive brain iron accumulation and neuronal vulnerability remain incompletely understood.

Iron’s potential to promote oxidative stress through Fenton chemistry and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) makes it a likely contributor to dopaminergic (DA) neuron degeneration14,15. Ferroptosis, a regulated form of iron-dependent cell death, has emerged as a key mechanism linking iron overload to neuronal loss1620, but how genetic risk factors for PD intersect with ferroptotic pathways is not fully defined. Among these genetic factors, mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), the most common cause of familial PD21, have been implicated in vesicular trafficking defects and lysosomal dysfunction2228, processes that could plausibly disrupt iron handling. Indeed, clinical imaging studies reveal that individuals carrying pathogenic LRRK2 mutations, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic, exhibit elevated nigral iron levels compared to idiopathic PD patients and healthy controls29, suggesting that iron dyshomeostasis could be an early and important feature in LRRK2-associated PD. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these observations remain unknown.

Autosomal dominant missense mutations in LRRK2 cause a late-onset form of familial PD while genome-wide association studies have identified risk-factor variants of LRRK2 linked to idiopathic PD21. PD-linked mutations segregate within the kinase domain (e.g. G2019S) and the Roc-COR tandem domain (e.g. R1441C, Y1699C) of LRRK2 and increase phosphorylation towards a subset of Rab GTPases including Rab8a and Rab1030,31 disrupting endolysosomal dynamics2225. Given that Rab GTPases govern critical steps in membrane trafficking and receptor recycling32 these pathways offer a potential intersection between LRRK2 function and iron regulation. In our previous work we observed alterations in trafficking of the transferrin receptor (TfR), that mediates iron uptake in most cell types33,34(p1),35(p13),36, in mutant LRRK2 overexpression models28. Importantly, we reported increase in brain ferritin and iron load in homozygous G2019S KI mice compared to WT controls, in acute pro-inflammatory conditions28. Whether such disturbances occur across different LRRK2 mutations, particularly in human neurons and glia when expressed in the heterozygous state, remains unclear. Astrocytes are key regulators of brain iron levels and availability as well as being implicated in PD neuropathology3743. While LRRK2 expression is enriched in astrocytes and we and others have reported effects of LRRK2 mutations on astrocytic function44,45, how endogenous LRRK2 mutations affect cellular iron status and distribution in human astrocytes and neurons as well as the role of altered iron in neuronal damage remain unexplored.

In this study, we leverage patient-derived and isogenic induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) models to investigate how pathogenic LRRK2 mutations influence iron regulation in human neurons and astrocytes. By examining a wide panel of iron-related phenotypes, we reveal convergent effects of heterozygous R1441C, Y1699C and G2019S LRRK2 mutations on intracellular and lysosomal iron content that were rescued by LRRK2 inhibition. Furthermore, we report distinct effects of LRRK2 mutations on ferritin and a concomitant effect on basal IRP activity, suggesting alterations in ferritin expression and regulation. Rab8a deficiency recapitulated key iron-related defects observed in LRRK2 mutant cells while Rab10 KO cells showed opposite phenotypes, consistent with work from us and others supporting divergent Rab8a/Rab10 biology. Lastly, LRRK2 mutant neurons showed ROS accumulation and lipid peroxidation that was reversed by iron chelation, supporting the engagement of the ferroptotic pathway. Our data highlight integral cellular iron regulation pathways that are dysregulated by LRRK2 mutations in human iPSC models, mechanistically link a direct LRRK2 kinase substrate to these effects, and suggest a central role for iron dyshomeostasis in the reported interplay between LRRK2 signaling and ROS in neurons.

Methods

Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSCs) cultures

We used iPSC lines carrying heterozygous LRRK2 mutations from three independent sources. BR33 were derived from a Caucasian donor, who was deeply phenotyped as part of the ROS/MAP longitudinal aging studies46,47 and determined to not be cognitively impaired at death at age >89 and free from genetic variants that confer risk of PD. ND35371 (R1441C heterozygous) and ND50051 (G2019S heterozygous) were obtained by the NINDS Repository. Five G2019S heterozygous, two R1441G heterozygous and five WT iPSC lines were obtained from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative dataset (PPMI, ppmi-info.org) along with longitudinal clinical data. The isogenic mutant LRRK2 lines (all heterozygous) were a kind gift from Dr Mark Cookson (NIA, NIH)48.

CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing of iPSCs and HEK293 cells

Rab8a and Rab10 knock out lines were generated in iPSCs and HEK293 cells as described before49. Briefly, single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were selected using a web-based design tool (http://crispr.mit.edu). Rab8a sgRNA: 5’ GAACTGGATTCGCAACATTG 3’; Rab10 sgRNA: 5’ ATGGCTTAGAAACATAGATG 3’. These were cloned into pXPR_003 (Addgene #52963), modified to express the neomycin resistance gene instead of the puromycin resistance gene and sequenced using the primer 5′-GATACAAGGCTGTTAGAGAGATAATT-3′ to determine clones that successfully integrated the sgRNA. BR33 iPSCs were generated and characterized in collaboration with the New York Stem Cell Foundation (NYSCF) using described methods 47,50,51. iPSCs were co-transfected with plasmids that express dCas9 (Addgene 61425) and the sgRNA plasmid. After 2 days, cells that were successfully transfected with the two plasmids were selected by puromycin treatment for 4 days. Individual clones were identified by plating ∼1 cell per well in a 96-well dish and allowed to grow for 2 weeks. Monoclonal lines were expanded, sequenced and stocked. Amplification of Rab8a and Rab10 genes was conducted according to manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen K2030–01) and homozygous gene editing was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalW in BioEdit.

iPSC differentiation into mature astrocytes

iPSCs were differentiated into iAs using the protocol developed by Canals and colleagues52. Briefly, iPSCs were maintained in mTeSR media and transduced with lentivirus to stably express pTet-O-NFIB (hygromycin), pTet-O-SOX9 (puromycin) and FUdelta GW-rtTA. Differentiation of pure human iA cultures was achieved by culturing transduced cells in doxycycline to induce expression of Sox9 and Nfib and to select against non-differentiated cells with selection media (puromycin and hygromycin). Human iAs were studied at day ~21 post-differentiation. iAs show marked expression of GFAP by staining and immunoblot and robust expression of LRRK2 and relevant Rab GTPases.

iPSCs differentiation into cortical neurons

iPSCs were differentiated into mature cortical neurons, as before49Sanyal, et al, Lee, Feenster et al.. Briefly, iPSCs were cultured in StemFlex (A33493) media and co-transduced with lentivirus packaged with pTet-O-NGN2-puro and Fudelta GW-rtTA plasmids (Zhang et al., 2013) for 2 days and passaged for expansion. NGN2-transduced iPSCs were thawed in StemFlex media with ROCK inhibitor (10 μM; Stemcell Technologies, 72304) and plated at 2 × 106 cells/10 cm plate and grown until 75% confluent. For differentiation, on day 1 cells were fed with KnockOut media (Gibco 10829.018) supplemented with KnockOut Serum Replacement (Invitrogen 10928–028), 1% MEM non-essential amino acids (Invitrogen 11140), 1% GlutaMAX (Gibco 35050061) and 0.1% BME (Invitrogen 21985–023) (KSR) with doxycycline (2 μg/ml, Sigma, D9891–5g) to induce NGN2 expression. On day 2, they were fed with a 1:1 ratio of KSR:N2B media (DMEM F12 supplemented with 1% GlutaMAX, 3% dextrose and N2-Supplement B; StemCell Technologies 07156) with puromycin (5 μg/ml; Life Technologies, A11138–03) and doxycycline to select for transduced cells. On day 3, the cells were fed with N2B media with B27 (1:100; Life technologies, 17504–044), puromycin, and doxycycline. On day 4, induced neurons (iNs) were frozen down in 10% DMSO/FBS in Neurobasal media (NBM Gibco 21103–049) supplemented with B27, BDNF (Peprotech, 450–02), CNTF (Peprotech, 450–13), and GDNF (Peprotech, 450–10) all at 100 ng/uL, ROCK inhibitor (10 μM), puromycin, and doxycycline. iNs were plated and grown in NBM with B27, BDNF, CNTF, GDNF, puromycin, and doxycycline until day 21.

PPMI UPDRSIII data

Data used in the preparation of this article was obtained from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database (www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data), RRID:SCR_006431. Openly available UPDRSIII data for five G2019S and two R1441G mutations carriers were used (Tier 1 data downloaded between 03 November 2023 and 10 November 2023).

IRE-binding activity assays

IRP activity was assessed using biotinylated IRE RNA probes, as previously described53. Briefly, probes were 3’-biotinylated and sourced from Eurofins Genomics or IDT. Cell/tissue lysates were prepared in lysis buffer (40 mM KCl, 25 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100) with protease inhibitors (ThermoFisher #78430), 1 mM DTT, and 20 U/ml RNase inhibitor (ThermoFisher #AM2696). For binding, 5 pmol of annealed IRE probes were incubated with 100 μg DynaBeads M280 for 20 min at room temp, washed three times, then mixed with 100 μg lysates for another 20 min. IRP-bound complexes were isolated magnetically, washed, and resuspended in 100 μL LDS buffer, denatured at 95 °C for 5 min, and analyzed by western blot (25 μL on 4–12% Bis-Tris gels) for IRP1 and IRP2.

ICP-MS

iPSCs in culture were collected in cold PBS and divided equally into two tubes for ICP-MS and biochemical analysis of protein levels, pelleted and frozen in dry ice. iPSC frozen pellets were resuspended in 200 μl PBS and mixed with 200 μl of concentrated trace-metal-grade nitric acid (Fisher) in 15 ml Falcon tube. The samples were digested at 85°C overnight, diluted to 4 ml with deionized water, and then analyzed by Agilent 7900 ICP-MS at the Analytical Toxicology Core Laboratory (ATCL) at the University of Florida. Metal amounts were normalized to protein amounts for cell number.

Cell Treatments

For iron overload or chelation, cells were treated with 150μM ferric ammonium citrate (FAC) (SIGMA) or 100μM of deferoxamine in normal media overnight prior to analysis by imaging or western blotting. For rescue experiments, cells were treated with 100nM MLi2 (Tocris) for 7 days in culture prior to analysis.

Western Blot

Cells were lysed in cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5% (v/v) sodium deoxycholate, 1% (v/v) NP-40, pH 8) with protease and phosphatase inhibitors for 30 min. Lysates were centrifuged at 14,000g for 15 min at 4°C, and supernatants were quantified using the BCA assay. Samples were prepared in 1x SDS-PAGE loading buffer, denatured at 65°C for 10 min, resolved on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and transferred to PVDF membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% BSA (Sigma) prior to probing with primary antibodies against Fth1 (Cell Signaling 4393S), Ftl (abcam AB69090), TfR1 (13–6800), DMT1 (abcam AB123085), Cyclophilin B (abcam AB16045). Secondary LiCOR antibodies were used for detection using the LiCOR model M scanner.

Immunocytochemistry

iPSCs, neurons or astrocytes were seeded at 120,000 cells/well (24 well plate) on 12 mm coverslips precoated with Geltrex basement membrane matrix (A1413201, Thermo) and cultured as described above. Cells were fixed in 4% (w/v) formaldehyde/PBS for 15 minutes, permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS for 10 minutes at RT, blocked in 5% (v/v) FBS in PBS, and incubated with primary antibodies in 1% (v/v) FBS/PBS overnight at 4C. Following 3 washes in PBS, the cells were incubated for 1 hour with secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488, 568, 647-conjugated; ThermoFisher). After 3 PBS washes, the coverslips were mounted, and the cells were imaged by confocal microscopy (Nikon CSU-W1-SORA).

Live Imaging of Cellular Probes

For confocal microscopy of live iron probes, cells were plated at 120,000 cells/well in the center of MatTek glass bottom dishes (p35g-1.5–14-c) precoated with Geltrex basement membrane matrix (A1413201, Thermo) and cultured as described above. Cells were labeled with FerroOrange (Dojindo), HMRhoNox-M (Lumiprobe), Liperfluo (Thermo), LysoTracker Red (Invitrogen), CellROX (Thermo) and Hoechst according to the manufacturer’s specifications, and imaged on a Nikon CSU-W1 SoRa Spinning Disk confocal. CellLight Lamp1-emGFP BacMam 2.0 (Thermo) was used to visualize lysosomes. For high-content imaging of iron probes, iPSCs, neurons or astrocytes were plated at 10,000 cells per well in 96-well black-wall clear-bottom plates (Greiner). Live cells were labeled as above and imaged at 10x or 20x magnification, six fields per well, in the DAPI, GFP, RFP and Cy5 channels using the Lionheart FX high-content automated microscope (Agilent). Images were analyzed on the Gen5 software.

Imaris analysis

Following confocal microscopy, the Imaris platform (Bitplane, Zürich, Switzerland) was used to analyze the localization and distribution of lysosomal iron in lysosomes. Z-stack confocal images of iAs were processed through the Imaris Surface Contour module to render lysosomal iron, lysosomes and nuclear staining to surfaces and measure the distance between lysosomes and proximity to the nuclear edge throughout z planes in the 3D volume.

Statistical Analyses

All experiments were conducted at least three independent times for three differentiations. Error bars indicate mean +SD. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software, using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test.

Results

LRRK2 mutations dysregulate iron-related pathways in patient-derived iPSCs in a kinase-dependent manner

In our previous work, we identified a signature of altered iron pathways in the kidneys of G2019S knockin mice by unbiased proteomics, highlighting divergent expression of endolysosomal and mitochondrial factors involved in iron regulation in vivo31. Separately, we reported increased accumulation of iron in the brains of homozygous G2019S LRRK2 mice following inflammation compared to WT controls28. These data were the first to suggest that G2019S LRRK2 dysregulates aspects of intracellular iron homeostasis in LRRK2 models. To examine whether these pathways are affected by endogenous LRRK2 mutations beyond G2019S, and when present in the heterozygous state associated with PD, we assessed different aspects of iron homeostasis in iPSCs from LRRK2 mutation carriers. We quanitified cytosolic iron levels in six WT, six G2019S, one R1441C, and two R1441G LRRK2 iPSC lines (all heterozygous) by high-content imaging of the FerroOrange probe, a fluorescent indicator of labile iron. We observed an increase of the steady state labile ferrous iron pool across different LRRK2 mutant lines compared to WT lines (Figure 1A, B). Each iPSC line is depicted in a different color to reflect the biological variability observed across the different patient-derived lines (Figure 1B). Upregulation of iron load in R1441C LRRK2 mutant iPSCs was further confirmed by ICP-MS (Figure 1C). Lastly, LRRK2 kinase inhibition reversed the increase in labile iron in heterozygous G2019S iPSC lines compared to WT with partial rescue on R1441C LRRK2 iPSCs (Figure 1D, E). Next, we investigated the levels of proteins involved in iron import (TfR1, DMT1) and iron storage (ferritin light chain; Ftl). We observed an overall increase in Ftl levels across the R1441C/G and G2019S mutant lines compared to WT iPSC controls (Figure 1F, G), while levels of TfR1 and DMT1 were comparable between lines (Figure 1F, H, I). Despite an overall effect of mutations on iron-related readouts, we noted biological variability in the levels of labile iron (Figure 1B) and ferritin (Figure 1G) across the different patient-derived iPSC lines. We noted moderate-to-strong correlation between labile iron levels (FerroOrange) and Ftl levels (R2=0.5660, F(1,13), p=0.0012) (Figure 1J), and a strong correlation between labile iron (FerroOrange) and total iron levels detected by ICP-MS (R2=0.8805. F(1,1), p=0.2247) (Figure 1K). Abnormal iron deposition in the SNc of PD patients is positively correlated to peripheral ferritin levels in the CSF and serum as well as motor symptom severity54,55. We did not observe a correlation between observed ferritin levels in the iPSC lines and motor symptom severity (UPDRS III scores) in LRRK2 PD or control groups reported for the iPSC donors (Figure 1L).

Figure 1. LRRK2 mutations dysregulate iron-related pathways in human iPSCs in a kinase-dependent manner.

Figure 1.

(A, B) Cytosolic free iron imaging and imaging (FerroOrange) in six WT, six G2019S, one R1441C, and two R1441G LRRK2 iPSC lines (PPMI, NINDS Repository) (N=6 wells each line; each line represented in a different color within each genotype group; one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s post-hoc pair-wise comparison). (C) Quantitation of total iron in WT, R1441C and G2019S iPSCs (NINDS Repository) by ICP-MS. (D, E) Imaging and quantitation of cytosolic free iron (FerroOrange) in mutant LRRK2 iPSCs (NINDS Repository) following Mli-2 treatment (100μM, 7 days) (two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc; N=9 biological replicates (>800 cells per N), Genotype ****p=0.0001, Treatment ****p<0.0001, Interaction p=0.2318). (F, G, H, I) Western blot and quantitation of levels of iron-related factors in WT, heterozygous R1441C/G, and G2019S iPSCs (N=2 biological replicates per line; 6 WT, 2 R1441G, 1 R1441C and 6 G2019S lines, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s post-hoc; *p<0.05). (J) Scatter plot showing a positive correlation between cytosolic iron (FerroOrange) and Ftl levels (r=0.7523). (K) Scatter plot showing a positive correlation between cytosolic iron (FerroOrange) and total iron levels by ICP-MS (r=0.93845; means of N>5 biological replicates shown per genotype). (L) Scatter plot showing no significant correlation between Ftl levels and clinical severity of patient donors (UPDRS-III).

LRRK2 mutations increase cellular iron in iPSC-derived neurons

Since iron dyshomeostasis is a key feature in PD pathology and our data support altered iron levels in LRRK2 mutant iPSCs, we next examined human iPSC-derived neurons to understand how this change translates in post-mitotic cells. iPSCs (NINDS Repository) were differentiated into mature cortical glutamatergic neurons (iNs) by forced expression of NGN2 via lentiviral gene delivery, according to published protocols25,49,56. We detected an increase in the labile iron pool across heterozygous R1441C and G2019S LRRK2 neurons compared to WT controls (Figure 2A, B). Considering the biological variability observed in these patient-derived iPSC lines (Figure 1), we next tested this phenotype in a series of isogenic heterozygous LRRK2 mutant iPSC lines. These lines were generated by CRISPR/Cas9 in a single female iPSC background, A18945, editing validated and subsequently characterized for morphology, karyotype abnormalities and differentiation potential48. NGN2-induced cortical neurons generated from the isogenic LRRK2 lines validated the phenotype with an increase in the labile iron pool across R1441C, Y1699C and G2019S LRRK2 compared to WT controls (Figure 2C), supporting an effect of diverse LRRK2 mutations on iron homeostasis.

Figure 2. LRRK2 mutations increase lysosomal iron in isogenic neurons and astrocytes.

Figure 2.

Cytosolic iron imaging and quantitation in mature iNs carrying heterozygous LRRK2 mutations (A, B) as well as isogenic iNs versus controls (NIA, NIH) (C). Representative images of lysosomal iron (HMRhoNox-M) and Lamp1-emGFP by super-resolution confocal microscopy in (D) iNs and (E) iAs. Cytosolic free iron imaging and quantitation in heterozygous LRRK2 mutant isogenic iPSCs (F, G), isogenic iNs (H, I), and isogenic iAs (J, K) (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s post-hoc, N=8 biological replicates, (>800 cells per N), *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). (L) Lysosomal iron quantitation in iAs following treatment with MLi-2 in culture (100nM, 7 days) (two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc; N=8 biological replicates (>800 cells per N), Genotype ****p=0.0001, Treatment ****p<0.0001, Interaction p=0.0844). (M) Super-resolution imaging of Lysosomal iron and Lamp1-emGFP in WT and isogenic R1441C iAs. Z-stack confocal images were 3D reconstructed in Imaris (Bitplane) and the frequency distribution of lysosomal iron content versus proximity to the nucleus (N) as well as lysosome size (O), were plotted.

LRRK2 mutations cause lysosomal iron accumulation in neurons and astrocytes

While our data indicate changes in labile and overall cellular iron levels, we did not initially assess subcellular distribution of iron with the FerroOrange iron probe. This probe detects free ferrous iron in the cytosol as well as in different organelles including ER, mitochondria and endolysosomes5759 (Supplementary Figure 1). Given the role of lysosomes as sites of cellular iron storage regulating intracellular iron availability6062, as well as studies by us and others demonstrating effects of LRRK2 mutations on lysosome-related pathways24,25,28,6365, we initially focused on evaluating perturbation of lysosomal iron levels in LRRK2 mutant cells.

We employed an iron probe (HMRhoNox-M) that specifically detects ferrous iron (Fe2+) in lysosomes and assessed lysosomal iron load across iPSCs, cortical NGN2-induced neurons (iNs) and induced-astrocytes (iAs)52 by high-content imaging and super-resolution microscopy (Figure 2E to O). iAs were generated by viral induction of SOX9 and NFIB expression52, and expression of astrocytic markers and LRRK2 was confirmed at ~21 days in vitro (Supplementary Figure 2). Initially, we tested specificity of HMRhoNox-M to lysosomes by comparing HMRhoNox-M staining to Lamp1-emGFP localization (Figure 2D, E). In both iPSC-derived human neurons (Figure 2D) and astrocytes (Figure 2E), HMRhoNox-M showed exclusive localization within Lamp1-emGFP positive structures, validating specificity to the lysosomal compartment. Assaying lysosomal iron levels in iPSCs carrying heterozygous LRRK2 mutations, revealed an increase in R1441C, Y1699C and G2019S LRRK2 mutant lines compared to isogenic WT controls (Figure 2F, G). This LRRK2 mutation-driven increase in lysosomal iron load was conserved in mature iNs (Figure 2H, I) and astrocytes (Figure 2J, K) generated from these isogenic lines. To test whether lysosomal iron increase in LRRK2 mutant iAs is dependent on LRRK2 kinase activity, iAs were treated with MLi-2 for 7 days prior to analysis (Figure 2L). Inhibition of LRRK2 kinase activity reduced lysosomal iron levels in all mutant lines but not WT, with partial rescue in the R1441C and Y1699C lines and complete rescue in the G2019S line (Figure 2L). LRRK2 is active on the lysosomal membrane with studies suggesting that lysosomal positioning modulates LRRK2 activity towards Rab GTPases66. We therefore assessed the distribution of iron content in lysosomes in relation to distance from the nucleus in mature iAs. We found that the increase in lysosomal iron content with the R1441C mutation was more prominent in perinuclear compared to peripheral lysosomes and also primarily observed in smaller (< 3 μm3) lysosomes (Figure 2 M, N, O). These data are consistent with perinuclear lysosomes being sites of active LRRK2 signaling66, as demonstrated by our work and that of others showing LRRK2-dependent effects on their function and proteolytic activity22,49,67,68. Together these results provide evidence for altered lysosomal ferrous iron levels associated with LRRK2 mutations.

Ferritin levels are dysregulated in isogenic LRRK2 mutant iPSCs

Altered cytosolic and lysosomal iron demonstrate an impairment in how cells regulate their iron levels and distribution, so we further evaluated expression of key proteins involved in these processes. Iron uptake, transport, and storage are finely regulated at the post-transcriptional level by the iron regulatory protein (IRP) and iron-responsive element (IRE) signaling pathways69. IRP1 and IRP2 are RNA-binding proteins that interact with IREs located within the untranslated regions of specific mRNAs, to modulate iron homeostasis. These interactions repress ferritin (both Fth1 and Ftl) and Fpn mRNA translation while stabilizing TfR mRNA7072. In proliferating iPSCs cultured without iron supplements, we observed an increase in total Fth1 and Ftl levels in G2019S LRRK2 cells compared to isogenic WT controls, while R1441C LRRK2 iPSCs showed a trend of lower Fth1 (Figure 3A, B, C). Consistent with an IRP1-mediated increase in ferritin protein levels, G2019S iPSCs also had lower basal TfR1 levels as compared to WT (Figure 3A, D). We therefore directly measured IRP1 and IRP2 levels and activity in these LRRK2 mutants. We observed a trend of downregulation of IRP1 in the ROC-COR domain mutants that reached significance in Y1699C iPSCs, supporting impairment in IRP1 signaling (Figure 3A, E). Separately, the G2019S iPSCs showed lower IRP2 expression levels with the ROC-COR domain mutants showing a trend toward decrease (Figure 3F). To evaluate IRE-binding activities of IRP1 and IRP2, we used a biotinylated-IRE probe to separate IRE-binding IRPs from cell lysates and analyzed by immunoblotting, as before53. The IRE-binding activity of IRP1 was lower in G2019S iPSCs compared to the isogenic WT controls while IRP2 activity showed a high degree of variability in these assays which precluded any determination (Figure 3G, H).

Figure 3. Ferritin heavy chain is dysregulated in isogenic LRRK2 mutant iPSCs.

Figure 3.

(A-F) Western blot analysis of IRPs (IRP1, IRP2) and IRP-regulated proteins (Fth1, Ftl, TfR1) in isogenic LRRK2 mutant iPSCs. (A bottom panel, G, H) Western blot of IRE-bound IRP1 and IRP2 in isogenic LRRK2 mutant iPSCs and quantitation of IRE-binding. (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s post-hoc, N=6 biological replicates, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).

IRP1 activity is regulated by intracellular iron levels but can also be influenced by Fe-S cluster biogenesis as it requires a 4Fe-4S cluster to function as cytosolic aconitase70,73 and loss of Fe-S clusters shifts IRP1 to its IRE-binding form, mimicking iron deficiency. Similarly, IRP2, though not Fe-S dependent, is stabilized when cytosolic iron is low, which can also happen if Fe-S cluster biogenesis is impaired in mitochondria. To evaluate a potential effect of iron dyshomeostasis on mitochondrial function, we assayed levels of mitochondrial Fe-S-containing subunits (Supplementary Fig 3), noting no differences in basal levels of MTCO1, UQCRFS1, UQCRC1, POLD1 and SDHB. While our data suggest a mild effect of LRRK2 mutations on IRP activity, we observe significant effects on ferritin levels, suggesting that separate mechanisms on ferritin homeostasis at the protein level may be at play.

Rab8a deficiency phenocopies LRRK2 mutation-driven iron accumulation

Phosphorylation of Rab GTPases by LRRK2 locks the molecules in an inactive state affecting their function28,32,49,74. Recently, we showed that LRRK2-driven phosphorylation of Rab8a impairs its function in TfR trafficking, linking LRRK2 to iron homeostasis28. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Rab8a KO and Rab10 KO neurons show distinct phenotypes in lysosomal integrity and PD-pathology related proteostasis49. To investigate whether inactivation of Rab8a uniquely drives dysregulation of cellular iron levels, we used CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to generate Rab8a KO and Rab10 KO iPSCs49 and HEK293 cells (Supplementary Figure 4), with matched isogenic controls and assayed cellular iron load as before using the FerroOrange probe. Rab8a KO iPSCs showed increased labile iron compared to isogenic WT controls, mimicking mutant LRRK2, while the opposite effect was seen in Rab10 iPSCs (Figure 4A, B). These data were replicated in iNs, with Rab8a deficiency resulting in accumulation of free cellular iron while this was not mirrored by Rab10 KO iNs (Figure 4C, D). These findings provide additional support to the hypothesis that reduced Rab8a activity is at least in part responsible for LRRK2-dependent changes in cellular iron storage.

Figure 4. Rab8a deficiency phenocopies LRRK2 mutation-driven iron accumulation.

Figure 4.

(A, B) Imaging of cytosolic free iron and quantitation of iron levels in WT, Rab8a KO and Rab10 KO iPSCs by high-content imaging. (C, D) Imaging and quantitation of free cytosolic iron in Rab8a KO and Rab10 KO iNs compared to isogenic controls. (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s post-hoc, N=6 biological replicates, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).

To investigate how Rab8a and Rab10 deficiency affect cellular iron homeostasis, we assayed levels of iron-related proteins at basal conditions, and in conditions of iron overload following overnight incubation in ferric ammonium citrate75. We observed an increase in basal Fth1 levels in Rab8a KO HEK293T cells compared to WT or Rab10 KO cells (Figure 5A, B). In conditions of iron overload, Rab8a cells showed a blunted increase in Fth1 expression compared to Rab10 KO cells, which showed the highest fold increase compared to WT (Figure 5A, C). Basal TfR1 levels were increased in Rab10 KO cells while both Rab KO cell lines showed higher fold decrease in TfR1 levels in iron overload conditions compared to WT (Figure 5A, D, E). Rab8a cells accumulated higher cellular iron levels compared to isogenic WT controls, in exogenous iron overload conditions, while this was ameliorated by iron chelation (Figure 5F, G, H). Taken together, these findings support that Rab8a inactivation mirrors the iron dyshomeostasis seen in LRRK2 mutations, marked by elevated free iron and blunted ferritin upregulation, whereas Rab10 deficiency appears to engage distinct, potentially compensatory trafficking pathways that differentially modulate iron homeostasis.

Figure 5. Rab8a deficiency impairs ferritin heavy chain regulation in HEK293 cells.

Figure 5.

(A-C) Western blot analysis of iron-related proteins in Rab8a KO and Rab10 KO HEK293 cells in basal and iron overload (FAC) conditions (two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc; N=3 biological replicates; Fth1: Genotype ****p=0.0001, Treatment ****p<0.0001, Interaction p=0.0508; TfR1: Genotype ****p=0.0001, Treatment ****p<0.0001, Interaction ****p<0.0001). (F-H) Imaging and quantitation of free iron in Rab8a KO HEK293 cells under iron overload (FAC) and iron chelation (DEF) conditions. (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s post-hoc, N=4 biological replicates, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).

Iron chelation protects against LRRK2-driven ROS accumulation and ferroptosis

Ferroptosis, the process of iron-dependent lipid peroxidation and cell death, is an emerging pathogenetic mechanism of interest in the neurodegeneration in PD16,7577. Iron catalyzes the conversion of hydrogen peroxide to ROS via the Fenton reaction, resulting in oxidative injury. Ferroptosis in neurodegeneration involves the simultaneous accumulation of brain iron and lipid peroxidation which trigger a cascade of pathologic events including inflammation, myelin sheath degeneration, glial dysregulation and cell death78. LRRK2 mutations have been linked to increased ROS in different model systems but how LRRK2 signaling leads to increased cell stress remains largely unclear79,80. To test whether heterozygous LRRK2 mutations result in ROS-induced damage in our systems, we employed Liperfluo, a live cell imaging probe that detects lipid peroxide-specific oxidation81. At basal conditions in proliferating cells, we detected an increase in lipid peroxidation in R1441C and G2019S iPSCs compared to isogenic WT controls (Figure 6A, B). These data are in line with recent work that places LRRK2 in a ferroptosis pathway and highlighting lipid peroxidation relevant to LRRK2 signaling82,83. Erastin is a small molecule ferroptosis inducer that inhibits the cystine/glutamate antiporter leading to depletion of glutathione and accumulation of lipid peroxides and cell damage8487. When challenged with erastin acutely, all lines showed increased lipid peroxidation, as expected (Figure 6B). There were no LRRK2-dependent differences following this exogenous stress. To investigate whether a similar LRRK2-driven phenotype is observed in neurons, mature iNs were stained with Liperfluo and analyzed by confocal microscopy and high-content imaging (Figure 6C, D, E). LRRK2 genotype had a significant effect on lipid peroxidation levels in heterozygous LRRK2 mutant iNs (two-way ANOVA) with an increase in Y1699C and G2019S LRRK2 lines compared to WT (Figure 6D, E). To test whether this LRRK2-driven phenotype is dependent on cellular iron, iNs were treated with deferoxamine overnight prior to imaging. Iron chelation by deferoxamine rescued the increase in lipid peroxidation seen with mutant LRRK2 (Figure 6D, E). Assessing cellular ROS levels by CellROX imaging revealed a genotype-driven accumulation across mutations that was likewise rescued by iron chelation (Figure 6F, G). Lastly, intralysosomal iron chelation was confirmed by imaging that revealed a decrease in lysosomal iron load across WT and mutant iNs following treatment with deferoxamine (Figure 6H, I). These data support an effect of endogenous heterozygous LRRK2 mutations on neuronal ROS and lipid peroxidation that is rescued by iron chelation.

Figure 6. Iron chelation protects against LRRK2-driven ROS accumulation and ferroptosis.

Figure 6.

(A) Isogenic iPSCs carrying LRRK2 mutations stained with Liperfluo to detect lipid peroxidation following treatment with Erastin or vehicle. (B) Quantitation of Liperfluo intensity by high-content imaging (two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc; N=9 biological replicates (>800 cells per N), Genotype *p=0.0105, Treatment ****p<0.0001, Interaction **p=0.0072). (C) Representative confocal image of iNs stained with Liperfluo. (D, E) Lipid peroxidation imaging and quantitation in iNs carrying heterozygous LRRK2 mutations versus isogenic WT control, following treatment with Deferoxamine. (F, G) High-content imaging and analysis of CellROX dye in LRRK2 mutant iNs. (H, I) High-content imaging and analysis of lysosomal iron content (HMRhoNox-M). (Liperfluo: two-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc; N=3 biological replicates (>800 cells per N), Genotype ***p=0.0009, Treatment ****p<0.0001, Interaction *p=0.0497; CellROX: two-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc; N=3 biological replicates (>800 cells per N), Genotype *p=0.02, Treatment ***p=0.0002, Interaction p=0.3923; HMRhoNox-M: two-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc; N=3 biological replicates (>800 cells per N), Genotype ***p=0.0003, Treatment ****p<0.0001, Interaction **p=0.0034).

Discussion

The pathological deposition of iron in the PD brain has been widely documented for over three decades, with early histochemical studies identifying iron accumulation in the substantia nigra of post-mortem PD tissue88,89, and subsequent MRI and spectroscopic studies confirming region-specific iron overload in vivo9,90,91. However, the mechanisms by which genetic risk factors may contribute to intracellular iron mismanagement have remained poorly defined. In this study we show that PD-linked LRRK2 mutations disrupt iron handling in human iPSCs, neurons, and astrocytes, with a striking and convergent increase in lysosomal ferrous iron. This iron accumulation is kinase-dependent and reversible, implicating chronic aberrant LRRK2 signaling in the misregulation of vesicular iron storage. By integrating imaging, biochemical assays, and isogenic models, we report that Rab8a deficiency phenocopies LRRK2-driven iron defects, and demonstrate that LRRK2 mutations sensitize neurons to iron-driven oxidative stress and ferroptosis. These findings provide a mechanistic link between LRRK2 activity and iron toxicity, offering new insight into the cell-autonomous vulnerabilities that may drive neurodegeneration in PD.

Most pathogenic LRRK2 mutations cluster within the kinase and the Roc-COR tandem domains of the protein, and augment the kinase activity of LRRK2 towards a subset of Rab GTPases30. Rab GTPases control many aspects of intracellular vesicle trafficking by acting as regulatable switches that recruit effector molecules to distinct intracellular membranes32,92. We and others, have shown that phosphorylation of Rab GTPase by mutant LRRK2, including Rab8a and Rab10, interferes with their function and alters endolysosomal dynamics22,24,28,30,31,9395. Furthermore, it has been reported that recruitment of LRRK2 to damaged lysosomes along with Rab8a and Rab10 and effects on lysosomal integrity24,28,63(p10). Studies have shown divergent effects of Rab8a and Rab10 in cilliogenesis96 and we recently reported distinct lysosomal phenotypes between Rab8a KO and Rab10 KO cells49. Here, we extend this work by demonstrating that Rab8a, but not Rab10, loss partially mimics aspects of iron impairment observed in LRRK2 mutant cells, including upregulation of labile cellular iron and ferritin. These results highlight a functional divergence between Rab8a and Rab10 in iron handling and point to Rab8a as a likely mediator of LRRK2-dependent iron misregulation, potentially through its role in transferrin receptor trafficking and lysosomal function28,36.

Lysosomes serve as crucial hubs for iron storage and availability61,62. Physiologic delivery of iron to cells is primarily mediated by transferrin, which binds ferric iron in the extracellular environment and is internalized through clathrin-dependent endocytosis via the transferrin receptor, while non-transferrin bound iron (NTBI) uptake can play a role in iron uptake associated with systemic iron overload or trauma97. Within endolysosomes, the acidic environment facilitates the release of iron from transferrin and endolysosomal ferrireductases reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+, allowing iron exit into the cytoplasm through DMT1. This endolysosomal acidification step is critical for iron release and trafficking, and its disruption has been linked to cellular iron deficiency, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation62,98,99. In fact, inhibition of the lysosomal v-ATPase triggers cellular iron dyshomeostasis, resulting in impaired mitochondrial function and non-apoptotic cell death in vivo98. Here, by using a lysosomal-specific iron probe we found that LRRK2 mutations lead to increased lysosomal ferrous iron content, an effect observed in both terminally differentiated neurons and astrocytes. These data, together with previous reports linking LRRK2 to lysosomal function24,28,63, and specifically intralumenal pH22,68, suggest that LRRK2 mutations disrupt normal lysosomal iron handling by altering lysosomal homeostasis. We found that perinuclear lysosomes have a pronounced increase in ferrous iron in LRRK2 mutant astrocytes compared to peripheral lysosomes. Studies have shown that perinuclear lysosomes have lower luminal pH and higher protease activity compared to distal ones67. Lysosomal positioning provides regulation of LRRK2 activity towards Rab GTPases with perinuclear lysosomes harboring enhanced kinase-driven Rab signaling66. We and others have reported dysregulation of lysosomal acidification by mutant LRRK2 in different cellular models22,27,68,100,101. It is plausible that impairment of endolysosomal iron reduction may be altering cellular iron content and availability in the context of LRRK2 mutations.

Iron-induced oxidative stress is a well-documented contributor to neurodegeneration, and our results support a role for LRRK2 mutations in exacerbating this process. Iron-induced cell death, termed ferroptosis, has emerged as a key mechanism contributing to oxidative damage and neuronal loss in PD models16,7577. The convergence of aberrant brain iron and lipid peroxidation initiates downstream pathology marked by inflammation, glial dysfunction, demyelination, and ultimately neuronal death78. Here, we observed increased lipid peroxidation and ROS levels in mutant LRRK2 neurons, which were reversed by iron chelation. LRRK2 has been linked to ROS accumulation in different cells models79,80, and a recent study reported an effect of LRRK2 mutations in NOX2 activity that in turn has been linked to ferroptosis80,102,103. It is plausible that dysregulation of the labile and lysosomal iron pools by LRRK2 mutations contribute to the reported effects of LRRK2 on cellular ROS. Lysosomal function is key to iron homeostasis and cell health. The lysosomal membrane is exposed to redox-active iron and is an initial target of intracellular oxidant damage, with studies reporting a protective role for intralysosomal iron chelation to ROS damage104. A recent study identified the lysosomal protein prosaposin as an important regulator of lipid peroxidation and neuronal ROS81. LRRK2 signaling has been linked to prosaposin function in vitro and in vivo, highlighting a potential functional interaction that could mediate ferroptosis signaling in this context105,106. What remains to be established is whether dysregulation of lysosomal iron storage by mutant LRRK2 directly drives cellular ROS damage, or whether aberrant transport of endolysosomal iron to the labile or mitochondrial iron pools contributes pathologic effects. Given that deferoxamine attenuated both ROS and lysosomal iron content further strengthens the connection between lysosomal iron mismanagement and oxidative stress in PD-relevant cell types. Ferroptosis inhibitors have shown promise in mitigating neurodegeneration in cell and in vivo preclinical models16,78,107, thus targeting lysosomal LRRK2-mediated iron dysregulation may represent a viable therapeutic strategy.

Cellular iron homeostasis is tightly regulated at the post-transcriptional level by IRPs, which bind to IREs in target mRNAs to control the expression of key iron-handling proteins69,70,72,73. In our models, ferritin levels were dysregulated in G2019S LRRK2 lines, while IRP1/2 activity showed genotype-specific variation. Notably, cytosolic ferritin levels did not correlate strictly with IRP binding activity, implying that lysosomal dysfunction and impaired ferritin turnover may dominate ferritin regulation in this context. Interestingly, G2019S showed stronger effects on IRP/ferritin regulation compared to R1441C and Y1699C, suggesting that distinct LRRK2 mutations may impact iron homeostasis via partially divergent mechanisms. Disruption of ferritinophagy, a lysosome-mediated pathway that regulates ferritin turnover and iron release19,108, may underlie the elevated ferritin levels and lysosomal iron accumulation we observe in LRRK2 mutant cells, suggesting that impaired ferritin degradation contributes to ferroptotic vulnerability via dysregulated iron recycling.

Our data reveal that LRRK2 mutations drive lysosomal iron accumulation in both neurons and astrocytes, supporting a model in which iron dysregulation arises through both cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms. Astrocytes are essential regulators of brain iron homeostasis, not only sequestering and buffering excess iron, but also modulating iron availability at synaptic interfaces by secreting factors that support neuronal iron uptake37,38,4143,109. By shaping the extracellular iron landscape, astrocytes maintain appropriately low synaptic levels and influence neuronal redox balance41,109. Astrocytes are relevant to LRRK2 biology as they express high levels of LRRK227,110,111, and their cytokine profile is modulated by LRRK2 kinase activity39,40,44. The increase in lysosomal ferrous iron observed in LRRK2 mutant astrocytes suggests a failure of astrocytic iron buffering capacity, that in an in vivo setting would translate to alterations of the synaptic iron microenvironment. In parallel, the accumulation of lysosomal iron in LRRK2 mutant neurons may reflect intrinsic defects in iron trafficking and storage, further sensitizing neurons to oxidative injury and ferroptosis. These findings highlight the dual contribution of LRRK2 to neurodegeneration: through direct, cell-autonomous disruption of neuronal iron handling, and indirectly by impairing astrocyte-mediated regulation of extracellular iron homeostasis.

Based on our current findings from human iPSC-derived models, further work will be needed to confirm whether similar lysosomal iron redistribution occurs in vivo in preclinical models where we previously reported effects on global iron pathways28,31. Additionally, while iron chelation and LRRK2 inhibition both rescued aspects of the phenotype, a dual therapeutic strategy remains to be tested in preclinical models. Importantly, iron chelation is an effective treatment in Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation that often includes parkinsonism symptoms112115, but recent clinical trials in PD failed116 suggesting that targeting precise iron pathways in the brain rather than systemic chelation is a promising avenue for altering disease progression

Conclusion

Our results position iron dysregulation as a central node in the pathogenic cascade downstream of LRRK2 mutations. We propose that LRRK2 functions as a key regulator of neuronal and glial iron homeostasis through its effects on lysosomal iron trafficking and that disruption of this function results in redox imbalance and ferroptotic vulnerability. Combined with our findings on the LRRK2 substrate Rab8a, this work offers new mechanistic insight into PD pathogenesis and providing a rational basis for combinatorial therapeutic strategies. Together, these data offer a framework for understanding how genetic PD risk converges on iron homeostasis and highlight new pathogenic pathways and opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (2.9MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and controls who volunteered to the study and the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) for providing access to their samples and data. Data used in the preparation of this article was obtained between 03 November 2023 and 10 November 2023 from the PPMI database (www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data), RRID:SCR_006431. For up-to-date information on the study, visit www.ppmi-info.org. PPMI, a public-private partnership, is funded by The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research and funding partners, including 4D Pharma, AbbVie, AcureX, Allergan, Amathus Therapeutics, Aligning Science Across Parkinson’s, AskBio, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, BIAL, BioArctic, Biogen, Biohaven, BioLegend, BlueRock Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calico Labs, Capsida Biotherapeutics, Celgene, Cerevel Therapeutics, Coave Therapeutics, DaCapo Brainscience, Denali, Edmond J. Safra Foundation, Eli Lilly, Gain Therapeutics, GE HealthCare, Genentech, GSK, Golub Capital, Handl Therapeutics, Insitro, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Lundbeck, Merck, Meso Scale Discovery, Mission Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Neuron23, Neuropore, Pfizer, Piramal, Prevail Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company, Takeda, Teva, UCB, Vanqua Bio, Verily, Voyager Therapeutics, The Weston Family Foundation, and Yumanity Therapeutics.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research (MJFF) grant MJFF-023425 (A.M., M.J.L.), National Institutes of Health grants NS110188 and AG083373 (M.J.L.) and AG077269 (A.M.), ES033625 (C.V) and the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

List of abbreviations

PD

Parkinson’s disease

iPSC

Induced pluripotent stem cell

iNs

Induced neurons

iAs

Induced astrocytes

LRRK2

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

FAC

Ferric ammonium citrate

DEF

Deferoxamine

TfR1

Transferrin receptor 1

DMT1

Divalent metal transporter 1

Fth1

Ferritin heavy chain

Ftl

Ferritin light chain

IRP

Iron regulatory protein

IRE

Iron-responsive element

ICP-MS

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

QSM

Quantitative susceptibility mapping

PPMI

Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

WT

Wild-type

Footnotes

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent for research was obtained from all individuals participating in the PPMI and approved by an ethical standards committee.

Consent for publication

This manuscript was reviewed by the PPMI Data and Publications Committee and is permitted for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Availability of data and materials

Materials and additional details can be made available by the corresponding authors upon request.

References

  • 1.Ayton S, Lei P. Nigral Iron Elevation Is an Invariable Feature of Parkinson’s Disease and Is a Sufficient Cause of Neurodegeneration. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014. doi: 10.1155/2014/581256 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barbosa JHO, Santos AC, Tumas V, Liu M, Zheng W, Haacke EM, Salmon CEG. Quantifying brain iron deposition in patients with Parkinson’s disease using quantitative susceptibility mapping, R2 and R2*. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2015;33(5):559–565. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.02.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Barros A, Arribarat G, Combis J, Chaynes P, Péran P. Matching ex vivo MRI With Iron Histology: Pearls and Pitfalls. Front Neuroanat. 2019;13:68. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2019.00068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guan X, Lancione M, Ayton S, Dusek P, Langkammer C, Zhang M. Neuroimaging of Parkinson’s disease by quantitative susceptibility mapping. NeuroImage. 2024;289:120547. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120547 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lehéricy S, Roze E, Goizet C, Mochel F. MRI of neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2020;33(4):462. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thomas GEC, Zarkali A, Ryten M, Shmueli K, Gil-Martinez AL, Leyland LA, McColgan P, Acosta-Cabronero J, Lees AJ, Weil RS. Regional brain iron and gene expression provide insights into neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2021;144(6):1787–1798. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Virel A, Faergemann E, Orädd G, Strömberg I. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to Study Striatal Iron Accumulation in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(11):e112941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112941 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zecca L, Berg D, Arzberger T, Ruprecht P, Rausch WD, Musicco M, Tampellini D, Riederer P, Gerlach M, Becker G. In vivo detection of iron and neuromelanin by transcranial sonography: a new approach for early detection of substantia nigra damage. Mov Disord. 2005;20(10):1278–1285. doi: 10.1002/mds.20550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wallis LI, Paley MNJ, Graham JM, Grünewald RA, Wignall EL, Joy HM, Griffiths PD. MRI assessment of basal ganglia iron deposition in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2008;28(5):1061–1067. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boelmans K, Holst B, Hackius M, Finsterbusch J, Gerloff C, Fiehler J, Münchau A. Brain iron deposition fingerprints in Parkinson’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord. 2012;27(3):421–427. doi: 10.1002/mds.24926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee JH, Lee MS. Brain Iron Accumulation in Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes: in vivo MRI Evidences for Distinctive Patterns. Front Neurol. 2019;10. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee SH, Lyoo CH, Ahn SJ, Rinne JO, Lee MS. Brain regional iron contents in progressive supranuclear palsy. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;45:28–32. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Y, Butros SR, Shuai X, Dai Y, Chen C, Liu M, Haacke EM, Hu J, Xu H. Different Iron-Deposition Patterns of Multiple System Atrophy with Predominant Parkinsonism and Idiopathetic Parkinson Diseases Demonstrated by Phase-Corrected Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(2):266–273. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Salazar J, Mena N, Hunot S, Prigent A, Alvarez-Fischer D, Arredondo M, Duyckaerts C, Sazdovitch V, Zhao L, Garrick LM, Nuñez MT, Garrick MD, Raisman-Vozari R, Hirsch EC. Divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) contributes to neurodegeneration in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. PNAS. 2008;105(47):18578–18583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804373105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Youdim MBH, Stephenson G, Ben Shachar D. Ironing iron out in Parkinson’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases with iron chelators: a lesson from 6-hydroxydopamine and iron chelators, desferal and VK-28. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1012:306–325. doi: 10.1196/annals.1306.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Do Van B, Gouel F, Jonneaux A, Timmerman K, Gelé P, Pétrault M, Bastide M, Laloux C, Moreau C, Bordet R, Devos D, Devedjian JC. Ferroptosis, a newly characterized form of cell death in Parkinson’s disease that is regulated by PKC. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;94:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu L, Cui Y, Chang YZ, Yu P. Ferroptosis-related factors in the substantia nigra are associated with Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):15365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42574-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wen S, Aki T, Unuma K, Uemura K. Chemically Induced Models of Parkinson’s Disease: History and Perspectives for the Involvement of Ferroptosis. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2020;14. Accessed January 1, 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2020.581191 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zuo Y, Xie J, Li X, Li Y, Thirupathi A, Zhang J, Yu P, Gao G, Chang Y, Shi Z. Ferritinophagy-Mediated Ferroptosis Involved in Paraquat-Induced Neurotoxicity of Dopaminergic Neurons: Implication for Neurotoxicity in PD. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2021;2021:e9961628. doi: 10.1155/2021/9961628 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tong ZB, Kim H, El Touny L, Simeonov A, Gerhold D. LUHMES Dopaminergic Neurons Are Uniquely Susceptible to Ferroptosis. Neurotox Res. 2022;40(5):1526–1536. doi: 10.1007/s12640-022-00538-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kluss JH, Mamais A, Cookson MR. LRRK2 links genetic and sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Biochem Soc Trans. 2019;47(2):651–661. doi: 10.1042/BST20180462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schapansky J, Khasnavis S, DeAndrade MP, Nardozzi JD, Falkson SR, Boyd JD, Sanderson JB, Bartels T, Melrose HL, LaVoie MJ. Familial knockin mutation of LRRK2 causes lysosomal dysfunction and accumulation of endogenous insoluble α-synuclein in neurons. Neurobiol Dis. 2018;111:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.12.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Beilina A, Bonet-Ponce L, Kumaran R, Kordich JJ, Ishida M, Mamais A, Kaganovich A, Saez-Atienzar S, Gershlick DC, Roosen DA, Pellegrini L, Malkov V, Fell MJ, Harvey K, Bonifacino JS, Moore DJ, Cookson MR. The Parkinson’s Disease Protein LRRK2 Interacts with the GARP Complex to Promote Retrograde Transport to the trans-Golgi Network. Cell Rep. 2020;31(5):107614. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107614 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bonet-Ponce L, Beilina A, Williamson CD, Lindberg E, Kluss JH, Saez-Atienzar S, Landeck N, Kumaran R, Mamais A, Bleck CKE, Li Y, Cookson MR. LRRK2 mediates tubulation and vesicle sorting from lysosomes. Science Advances. 2020;6(46):eabb2454. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb2454 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sanyal A, Novis HS, Gasser E, Lin S, LaVoie MJ. LRRK2 Kinase Inhibition Rescues Deficits in Lysosome Function Due to Heterozygous GBA1 Expression in Human iPSC-Derived Neurons. Front Neurosci. 2020;14. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Biskup S, Moore DJ, Celsi F, Higashi S, West AB, Andrabi SA, Kurkinen K, Yu SW, Savitt JM, Waldvogel HJ, Faull RLM, Emson PC, Torp R, Ottersen OP, Dawson TM, Dawson VL. Localization of LRRK2 to membranous and vesicular structures in mammalian brain. Ann Neurol. 2006;60(5):557–569. doi: 10.1002/ana.21019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Henry AG, Aghamohammadzadeh S, Samaroo H, Chen Y, Mou K, Needle E, Hirst WD. Pathogenic LRRK2 mutations, through increased kinase activity, produce enlarged lysosomes with reduced degradative capacity and increase ATP13A2 expression. Human Molecular Genetics. 2015;24(21):6013–6028. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mamais A, Kluss JH, Bonet-Ponce L, Landeck N, Langston RG, Smith N, Beilina A, Kaganovich A, Ghosh MC, Pellegrini L, Kumaran R, Papazoglou I, Heaton GR, Bandopadhyay R, Maio N, Kim C, LaVoie MJ, Gershlick DC, Cookson MR. Mutations in LRRK2 linked to Parkinson disease sequester Rab8a to damaged lysosomes and regulate transferrin-mediated iron uptake in microglia. PLOS Biology. 2021;19(12):e3001480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001480 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pyatigorskaya N, Sharman M, Corvol JC, Valabregue R, Yahia-Cherif L, Poupon F, Cormier-Dequaire F, Siebner H, Klebe S, Vidailhet M, Brice A, Lehéricy S. High nigral iron deposition in LRRK2 and Parkin mutation carriers using R2* relaxometry. Movement Disorders. 2015;30(8):1077–1084. doi: 10.1002/mds.26218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Steger M, Tonelli F, Ito G, Davies P, Trost M, Vetter M, Wachter S, Lorentzen E, Duddy G, Wilson S, Baptista MA, Fiske BK, Fell MJ, Morrow JA, Reith AD, Alessi DR, Mann M. Phosphoproteomics reveals that Parkinson’s disease kinase LRRK2 regulates a subset of Rab GTPases. eLife. 2016;5. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12813 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kluss JH, Mazza MC, Li Y, Manzoni C, Lewis PA, Cookson MR, Mamais A. Preclinical modeling of chronic inhibition of the Parkinson’s disease associated kinase LRRK2 reveals altered function of the endolysosomal system in vivo. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 2021;16(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13024-021-00441-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pfeffer SR. LRRK2 and Rab GTPases. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2018;46(6):1707–1712. doi: 10.1042/BST20180470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hattula K, Furuhjelm J, Tikkanen J, Tanhuanpaa K, Laakkonen P, Peranen J. Characterization of the Rab8-specific membrane traffic route linked to protrusion formation. Journal of Cell Science. 2006;119(23):4866–4877. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sharma M, Giridharan SSP, Rahajeng J, Naslavsky N, Caplan S. MICAL-L1 links EHD1 to tubular recycling endosomes and regulates receptor recycling. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(24):5181–5194. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-06-0535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kobayashi H, Etoh K, Ohbayashi N, Fukuda M. Rab35 promotes the recruitment of Rab8, Rab13 and Rab36 to recycling endosomes through MICAL-L1 during neurite outgrowth. Biology Open. 2014;3(9):803–814. doi: 10.1242/bio.20148771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Burtey A, Wagner M, Hodneland E, Skaftnesmo KO, Schoelermann J, Mondragon IR, Espedal H, Golebiewska A, Niclou SP, Bjerkvig R, Kögel T, Gerdes HH. Intercellular transfer of transferrin receptor by a contact-, Rab8-dependent mechanism involving tunneling nanotubes. The FASEB Journal. 2015;29(11):4695–4712. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-268615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Codazzi F, Pelizzoni I, Zacchetti D, Grohovaz F. Iron entry in neurons and astrocytes: a link with synaptic activity. Front Mol Neurosci. 2015;8. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2015.00018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dringen R, Bishop GM, Koeppe M, Dang TN, Robinson SR. The pivotal role of astrocytes in the metabolism of iron in the brain. Neurochem Res. 2007;32(11):1884–1890. doi: 10.1007/s11064-007-9375-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.di Domenico A, Carola G, Calatayud C, Pons-Espinal M, Muñoz JP, Richaud-Patin Y, Fernandez-Carasa I, Gut M, Faella A, Parameswaran J, Soriano J, Ferrer I, Tolosa E, Zorzano A, Cuervo AM, Raya A, Consiglio A. Patient-Specific iPSC-Derived Astrocytes Contribute to Non-Cell-Autonomous Neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s Disease. Stem Cell Reports. 2019;12(2):213–229. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.12.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sonninen TM, Hämäläinen RH, Koskuvi M, Oksanen M, Shakirzyanova A, Wojciechowski S, Puttonen K, Naumenko N, Goldsteins G, Laham-Karam N, Lehtonen M, Tavi P, Koistinaho J, Lehtonen Š. Metabolic alterations in Parkinson’s disease astrocytes. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14474. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71329-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pelizzoni I, Zacchetti D, Campanella A, Grohovaz F, Codazzi F. Iron uptake in quiescent and inflammation-activated astrocytes: A potentially neuroprotective control of iron burden. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1832(8):1326–1333. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.You L, Yu PP, Dong T, Guo W, Chang S, Zheng B, Ci Y, Wang F, Yu P, Gao G, Chang YZ. Astrocyte-derived hepcidin controls iron traffic at the blood-brain-barrier via regulating ferroportin 1 of microvascular endothelial cells. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(8):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05043-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McCarthy RC, Kosman DJ. Glial Cell Ceruloplasmin and Hepcidin Differentially Regulate Iron Efflux from Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(2):e89003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sanyal A, DeAndrade MP, Novis HS, Lin S, Chang J, Lengacher N, Tomlinson JJ, Tansey MG, LaVoie MJ. Lysosome and Inflammatory Defects in GBA1-Mutant Astrocytes Are Normalized by LRRK2 Inhibition. Mov Disord. 2020;35(5):760–773. doi: 10.1002/mds.27994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.de Rus Jacquet A, Tancredi JL, Lemire AL, DeSantis MC, Li WP, O’Shea EK. The LRRK2 G2019S mutation alters astrocyte-to-neuron communication via extracellular vesicles and induces neuron atrophy in a human iPSC-derived model of Parkinson’s disease. Bellen HJ, Zoghbi HY, eds. eLife. 2021;10:e73062. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73062 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bennett DA, Buchman AS, Boyle PA, Barnes LL, Wilson RS, Schneider JA. Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(s1):S161–S189. doi: 10.3233/JAD-179939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lagomarsino VN, Pearse RV, Liu L, Hsieh YC, Fernandez MA, Vinton EA, Paull D, Felsky D, Tasaki S, Gaiteri C, Vardarajan B, Lee H, Muratore CR, Benoit CR, Chou V, Fancher SB, He A, Merchant JP, Duong DM, Martinez H, Zhou M, Bah F, Vicent MA, Stricker JMS, Xu J, Dammer EB, Levey AI, Chibnik LB, Menon V, Seyfried NT, De Jager PL, Noggle S, Selkoe DJ, Bennett DA, Young-Pearse TL. Stem cell-derived neurons reflect features of protein networks, neuropathology, and cognitive outcome of their aged human donors. Neuron. Published online August 26, 2021:S0896–6273(21)00578-X. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.08.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Beylina A, Langston RG, Rosen D, Reed X, Cookson MR. Generation of fourteen isogenic cell lines for Parkinson’s disease-associated leucine-rich repeat kinase (LRRK2). Stem Cell Res. 2021;53:102354. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2021.102354 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mamais A, Sanyal A, Fajfer A, Zykoski CG, Guldin M, Riley-DiPaolo A, Subrahmanian N, Gibbs W, Lin S, LaVoie MJ. The LRRK2 kinase substrates RAB8a and RAB10 contribute complementary but distinct disease-relevant phenotypes in human neurons. Stem Cell Reports. 2024;19(2):163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Muratore CR, Zhou C, Liao M, Fernandez MA, Taylor WM, Lagomarsino VN, Pearse RV, Rice HC, Negri JM, He A, Srikanth P, Callahan DG, Shin T, Zhou M, Bennett DA, Noggle S, Love JC, Selkoe DJ, Young-Pearse TL. Cell-type Dependent Alzheimer’s Disease Phenotypes: Probing the Biology of Selective Neuronal Vulnerability. Stem Cell Reports. 2017;9(6):1868–1884. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.10.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Paull D, Sevilla A, Zhou H, Hahn AK, Kim H, Napolitano C, Tsankov A, Shang L, Krumholz K, Jagadeesan P, Woodard CM, Sun B, Vilboux T, Zimmer M, Forero E, Moroziewicz DN, Martinez H, Malicdan MCV, Weiss KA, Vensand LB, Dusenberry CR, Polus H, Sy KTL, Kahler DJ, Gahl WA, Solomon SL, Chang S, Meissner A, Eggan K, Noggle SA. Automated, high-throughput derivation, characterization and differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Methods. 2015;12(9):885–892. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Canals I, Ginisty A, Quist E, Timmerman R, Fritze J, Miskinyte G, Monni E, Hansen MG, Hidalgo I, Bryder D, Bengzon J, Ahlenius H. Rapid and efficient induction of functional astrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells. Nature Methods. 2018;15(9):693–696. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0103-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang DL, Ollivierre H, Rouault TA. Using Biotinylated Iron-Responsive Element to Analyze the Activity of Iron Regulatory Proteins. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(9):4852. doi: 10.3390/ijms25094852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.An H, Zeng X, Niu T, Li G, Yang J, Zheng L, Zhou W, Liu H, Zhang M, Huang D, Li J. Quantifying iron deposition within the substantia nigra of Parkinson’s disease by quantitative susceptibility mapping. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2018;386:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu Z, cong Shen H, hong Lian T, Mao L, xian Tang S, Sun L, yan Huang X, Guo P, jie Cao C, yang Yu S, jun Zuo L, Wang XM, Chen SD, Chan P, Zhang W. Iron deposition in substantia nigra: abnormal iron metabolism, neuroinflammatory mechanism and clinical relevance. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14973. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14721-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhang Y, Pak C, Han Y, Ahlenius H, Zhang Z, Chanda S, Marro S, Patzke C, Acuna C, Covy J, Xu W, Yang N, Danko T, Chen L, Wernig M, Südhof TC. Rapid Single-Step Induction of Functional Neurons from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Neuron. 2013;78(5):785–798. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hirayama T, Miki A, Nagasawa H. Organelle-specific analysis of labile Fe(ii) during ferroptosis by using a cocktail of various colour organelle-targeted fluorescent probes†. Metallomics. 2019;11(1):111–117. doi: 10.1039/c8mt00212f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tomita K, Fukumoto M, Itoh K, Kuwahara Y, Igarashi K, Nagasawa T, Suzuki M, Kurimasa A, Sato T. MiR-7–5p is a key factor that controls radioresistance via intracellular Fe2+ content in clinically relevant radioresistant cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2019;518(4):712–718. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.08.117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li X, Wang T, Huang X, Li Y, Sun T, Zang S, Guan K, Xiong Y, Liu J, Yuan H. Targeting ferroptosis alleviates methionine-choline deficient (MCD)-diet induced NASH by suppressing liver lipotoxicity. Liver International. 2020;40(6):1378–1394. doi: 10.1111/liv.14428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chen LL, Huang YJ, tao Cui J, Song N, Xie J. Iron dysregulation in Parkinson’s disease: focused on the autophagy-lysosome pathway. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. Published online December 27, 2018. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00390 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kurz T, Eaton JW, Brunk UT. The role of lysosomes in iron metabolism and recycling. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2011;43(12):1686–1697. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rizzollo F, More S, Vangheluwe P, Agostinis P. The lysosome as a master regulator of iron metabolism. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2021;46(12):960–975. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2021.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Eguchi T, Kuwahara T, Sakurai M, Komori T, Fujimoto T, Ito G, Yoshimura S ichiro, Harada A, Fukuda M, Koike M, Iwatsubo T. LRRK2 and its substrate Rab GTPases are sequentially targeted onto stressed lysosomes and maintain their homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(39):E9115–E9124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812196115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Schapansky J, Nardozzi JD, Felizia F, LaVoie MJ. Membrane recruitment of endogenous LRRK2 precedes its potent regulation of autophagy. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(16):4201–4214. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Liu Z, Bryant N, Kumaran R, Beilina A, Abeliovich A, Cookson MR, West AB. LRRK2 phosphorylates membrane-bound Rabs and is activated by GTP-bound Rab7L1 to promote recruitment to the trans-Golgi network. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(2):385–395. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kluss JH, Beilina A, Williamson CD, Lewis PA, Cookson MR, Bonet-Ponce L. Lysosomal positioning regulates Rab10 phosphorylation at LRRK2+ lysosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;119(43):e2205492119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205492119 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Johnson DE, Ostrowski P, Jaumouillé V, Grinstein S. The position of lysosomes within the cell determines their luminal pH. Journal of Cell Biology. 2016;212(6):677–692. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201507112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wallings R, Connor-Robson N, Wade-Martins R. LRRK2 interacts with the vacuolar-type H+-ATPase pump a1 subunit to regulate lysosomal function. Human Molecular Genetics. 2019;28(16):2696–2710. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rouault TA. The role of iron regulatory proteins in mammalian iron homeostasis and disease. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2(8):406–414. doi: 10.1038/nchembio807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pantopoulos K. Iron metabolism and the IRE/IRP regulatory system: an update. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1012:1–13. doi: 10.1196/annals.1306.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wallander ML, Leibold EA, Eisenstein RS. Molecular control of vertebrate iron homeostasis by iron regulatory proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763(7):668–689. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhang DL, Ghosh MC, Rouault TA. The physiological functions of iron regulatory proteins in iron homeostasis - an update. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:124. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhou ZD, Tan EK. Iron regulatory protein (IRP)-iron responsive element (IRE) signaling pathway in human neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12. doi: 10.1186/s13024-017-0218-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Thirstrup K, Dächsel JC, Oppermann FS, Williamson DS, Smith GP, Fog K, Christensen KV. Selective LRRK2 kinase inhibition reduces phosphorylation of endogenous Rab10 and Rab12 in human peripheral mononuclear blood cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10501-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zhang P, Chen L, Zhao Q, Du X, Bi M, Li Y, Jiao Q, Jiang H. Ferroptosis was more initial in cell death caused by iron overload and its underlying mechanism in Parkinson’s disease. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2020;152:227–234. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Angelova PR, Choi ML, Berezhnov AV, Horrocks MH, Hughes CD, De S, Rodrigues M, Yapom R, Little D, Dolt KS, Kunath T, Devine MJ, Gissen P, Shchepinov MS, Sylantyev S, Pavlov EV, Klenerman D, Abramov AY, Gandhi S. Alpha synuclein aggregation drives ferroptosis: an interplay of iron, calcium and lipid peroxidation. Cell Death & Differentiation. 2020;27(10):2781–2796. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0542-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chen X, Comish PB, Tang D, Kang R. Characteristics and Biomarkers of Ferroptosis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.637162 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Reichert CO, de Freitas FA, Sampaio-Silva J, Rokita-Rosa L, Barros P de L, Levy D, Bydlowski SP. Ferroptosis Mechanisms Involved in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(22):8765. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Heo HY, Park JM, Kim CH, Han BS, Kim KS, Seol W. LRRK2 enhances oxidative stress-induced neurotoxicity via its kinase activity. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(4):649–656. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Keeney MT, Rocha EM, Hoffman EK, Farmer K, Di Maio R, Weir J, Wagner WG, Hu X, Clark CL, Castro SL, Scheirer A, Fazzari M, De Miranda BR, Pintchovski SA, Shrader WD, Pagano PJ, Hastings TG, Greenamyre JT. LRRK2 regulates production of reactive oxygen species in cell and animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Science Translational Medicine. 2024;16(767):eadl3438. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adl3438 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tian R, Abarientos A, Hong J, Hashemi SH, Yan R, Dräger N, Leng K, Nalls MA, Singleton AB, Xu K, Faghri F, Kampmann M. Genome-wide CRISPRi/a screens in human neurons link lysosomal failure to ferroptosis. Nat Neurosci. Published online May 24, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00862-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Oun A, Soliman A, Trombetta-Lima M, Tzepapadaki A, Tsagkari D, Kortholt A, Dolga AM. LRRK2 protects immune cells against erastin-induced ferroptosis. Neurobiology of Disease. 2022;175:105917. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105917 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Z Z, Z S, L X, W X, X C, W X, Z X, X X, L Z, Y L, L G. LRRK2 regulates ferroptosis through the system Xc-GSH-GPX4 pathway in the neuroinflammatory mechanism of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of cellular physiology. 2024;239(5). doi: 10.1002/jcp.31250 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Forcina GC, Dixon SJ. GPX4 at the Crossroads of Lipid Homeostasis and Ferroptosis. Proteomics. 2019;19(18):e1800311. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201800311 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sato M, Kusumi R, Hamashima S, Kobayashi S, Sasaki S, Komiyama Y, Izumikawa T, Conrad M, Bannai S, Sato H. The ferroptosis inducer erastin irreversibly inhibits system xc− and synergizes with cisplatin to increase cisplatin’s cytotoxicity in cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):968. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19213-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Xie Y, Hou W, Song X, Yu Y, Huang J, Sun X, Kang R, Tang D. Ferroptosis: process and function. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(3):369–379. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhao J, Xu B, Xiong Q, Feng Y, Du H. Erastin-induced ferroptosis causes physiological and pathological changes in healthy tissues of mice. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2021;24(4):1–8. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12352 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sofic E, Riederer P, Heinsen H, Beckmann H, Reynolds GP, Hebenstreit G, Youdim MB. Increased iron (III) and total iron content in post mortem substantia nigra of parkinsonian brain. J Neural Transm. 1988;74(3):199–205. doi: 10.1007/BF01244786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hirsch EC, Brandel JP, Galle P, Javoy-Agid F, Agid Y. Iron and aluminum increase in the substantia nigra of patients with Parkinson’s disease: an X-ray microanalysis. J Neurochem. 1991;56(2):446–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb08170.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dexter DT, Wells FR, Agid F, Agid Y, Lees AJ, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Increased nigral iron content in postmortem parkinsonian brain. Lancet. 1987;2(8569):1219–1220. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91361-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bartzokis G, Cummings JL, Markham CH, Marmarelis PZ, Treciokas LJ, Tishler TA, Marder SR, Mintz J. MRI evaluation of brain iron in earlier- and later-onset Parkinson’s disease and normal subjects. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;17(2):213–222. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(98)00155-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Agola J, Jim P, Ward H, BasuRay S, Wandinger-Ness A. Rab GTPases as regulators of endocytosis, targets of disease and therapeutic opportunities. Clin Genet. 2011;80(4):305–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01724.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Greggio E, Jain S, Kingsbury A, Bandopadhyay R, Lewis P, Kaganovich A, van der Brug MP, Beilina A, Blackinton J, Thomas KJ, Ahmad R, Miller DW, Kesavapany S, Singleton A, Lees A, Harvey RJ, Harvey K, Cookson MR. Kinase activity is required for the toxic effects of mutant LRRK2/dardarin. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;23(2):329–341. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Berndsen K, Lis P, Yeshaw WM, Wawro PS, Nirujogi RS, Wightman M, Macartney T, Dorward M, Knebel A, Tonelli F, Pfeffer SR, Alessi DR. PPM1H phosphatase counteracts LRRK2 signaling by selectively dephosphorylating Rab proteins. Harper W, Cole PA, Harper W, Newton AC, McPherson PS, eds. eLife. 2019;8:e50416. doi: 10.7554/eLife.50416 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.West AB, Moore DJ, Choi C, Andrabi SA, Li X, Dikeman D, Biskup S, Zhang Z, Lim KL, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. Parkinson’s disease-associated mutations in LRRK2 link enhanced GTP-binding and kinase activities to neuronal toxicity. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16(2):223–232. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Dhekne HS, Yanatori I, Gomez RC, Tonelli F, Diez F, Schüle B, Steger M, Alessi DR, Pfeffer SR. A pathway for Parkinson’s Disease LRRK2 kinase to block primary cilia and Sonic hedgehog signaling in the brain. Burd CG, Malhotra V, eds. eLife. 2018;7:e40202. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40202 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Silva AMN, Rangel M. The (Bio)Chemistry of Non-Transferrin-Bound Iron. Molecules. 2022;27(6):1784. doi: 10.3390/molecules27061784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Yambire KF, Rostosky C, Watanabe T, Pacheu-Grau D, Torres-Odio S, Sanchez-Guerrero A, Senderovich O, Meyron-Holtz EG, Milosevic I, Frahm J, West AP, Raimundo N. Impaired lysosomal acidification triggers iron deficiency and inflammation in vivo. Pfeffer SR, McPherson PS, eds. eLife. 2019;8:e51031. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Miles AL, Burr SP, Grice GL, Nathan JA. The vacuolar-ATPase complex and assembly factors, TMEM199 and CCDC115, control HIF1α prolyl hydroxylation by regulating cellular iron levels. Chacinska A, ed. eLife. 2017;6:e22693. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22693 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Manzoni C, Mamais A, Dihanich S, McGoldrick P, Devine MJ, Zerle J, Kara E, Taanman JW, Healy DG, Marti-Masso JF, Schapira AH, Plun-Favreau H, Tooze S, Hardy J, Bandopadhyay R, Lewis PA. Pathogenic Parkinson’s disease mutations across the functional domains of LRRK2 alter the autophagic/lysosomal response to starvation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;441(4):862–866. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.10.159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Eguchi T, Sakurai M, Wang Y, Saito C, Yoshii G, Wileman T, Mizushima N, Kuwahara T, Iwatsubo T. The V-ATPase-ATG16L1 axis recruits LRRK2 to facilitate the lysosomal stress response. J Cell Biol. 2024;223(3):e202302067. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202302067 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Feng Y, Wang X, Li P, Shi X, Prokosch V, Liu H. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide and NOX2 inhibition mitigate ferroptosis in pressure-induced retinal ganglion cell damage. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 2025;1871(3):167705. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2025.167705 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Wang Q, Liu J, Zhang Y, Li Z, Zhao Z, Jiang W, Zhao J, Hou L, Wang Q. Microglial CR3 promotes neuron ferroptosis via NOX2-mediated iron deposition in rotenone-induced experimental models of Parkinson’s disease. Redox Biology. 2024;77:103369. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103369 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kurz T, Gustafsson B, Brunk UT. Intralysosomal iron chelation protects against oxidative stress-induced cellular damage. FEBS J. 2006;273(13):3106–3117. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05321.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Boddu R, Hull TD, Bolisetty S, Hu X, Moehle MS, Daher JPL, Kamal AI, Joseph R, George JF, Agarwal A, Curtis LM, West AB. Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 deficiency is protective in rhabdomyolysis-induced kidney injury. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(14):4078–4093. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Dehestani M, Kessler W, Karmali N, Sun W, Volos P, Tsitkov S, Dhingra A, Rodriguez-Nieto S, Tietz J, Schafflick D, Fernandes N, Fitzgerald J, Fraenkel E, Gasser T, Rafiq NM, Kuhlmann T, Bansal V. Single-cell transcriptomic changes in oligodendroglial lineage cells derived from Parkinson’s disease patient-iPSCs with LRRK2-G2019S mutation. bioRxiv. Preprint posted online September 10, 2024:2024.07.01.601392. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.01.601392 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zille M, Karuppagounder SS, Chen Y, Gough PJ, Bertin J, Finger J, Milner TA, Jonas EA, Ratan RR. Neuronal Death After Hemorrhagic Stroke In Vitro and In Vivo Shares Features of Ferroptosis and Necroptosis. Stroke. 2017;48(4):1033–1043. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Quiles Del Rey M, Mancias JD. NCOA4-Mediated Ferritinophagy: A Potential Link to Neurodegeneration. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:238. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ke Y, Ho K, Du J, Zhu L, Xu Y, Wang Q, Wang CY, Li L, Ge X, Chang YZ, Qian ZM. Role of soluble ceruloplasmin in iron uptake by midbrain and hippocampus neurons. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2006;98(4):912–919. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Booth HDE, Hirst WD, Wade-Martins R. The Role of Astrocyte Dysfunction in Parkinson’s Disease Pathogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40(6):358–370. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Dzamko N, Gysbers AM, Bandopadhyay R, Bolliger MF, Uchino A, Zhao Y, Takao M, Wauters S, van de Berg WDJ, Takahashi-Fujigasaki J, Nichols RJ, Holton JL, Murayama S, Halliday GM. LRRK2 levels and phosphorylation in Parkinson’s disease brain and cases with restricted Lewy bodies. Movement Disorders. 2017;32(3):423–432. doi: 10.1002/mds.26892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hogarth P. Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation: Diagnosis and Management. J Mov Disord. 2015;8(1):1–13. doi: 10.14802/jmd.14034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Romano N, Baiardi G, Pinto VM, Quintino S, Gianesin B, Sasso R, Diociasi A, Mattioli F, Marchese R, Abbruzzese G, Castaldi A, Forni GL. Long-Term Neuroradiological and Clinical Evaluation of NBIA Patients Treated with a Deferiprone Based Iron-Chelation Therapy. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4524. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Iankova V, Karin I, Klopstock T, Schneider SA. Emerging Disease-Modifying Therapies in Neurodegeneration With Brain Iron Accumulation (NBIA) Disorders. Front Neurol. 2021;12. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.629414 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Schneider SA, Bhatia KP. Excess iron harms the brain: the syndromes of neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (NBIA). J Neural Transm. 2013;120(4):695–703. doi: 10.1007/s00702-012-0922-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Devos D, Rascol O, Meissner WG, Foubert-Samier A, Lewis S, Tranchant C, Anheim M, Maltête D, Remy P, Eggert K, Pape H, Geny C, Couratier P, Carroll C, Sheridan R, Burn D, Pavese N, Raw J, Berg D, Suchowersky O, Kalia LV, Evans A, Drapier S, Danaila T, Schnitzler A, Corvol JC, Defer G, Temin NT, Fradette C, Tricta F, Moreau C. Therapeutic modalities of deferiprone in Parkinson’s disease: SKY and EMBARK studies. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease. 2025;15(1):72–86. doi: 10.1177/1877718X241300295 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (2.9MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Materials and additional details can be made available by the corresponding authors upon request.


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES