Childhood obesity is an emerging and multifactorial public health challenge resulting from the interaction of genetic, metabolic, social, and cultural determinants. Dietary habits are particularly relevant, as they are central to the regulation of energy balance. Indeed, gut microbiota seems to be a target factor to prevent and treat obesity. This narrative review aims to evaluate the gut microbiota in children suffering from obesity, and to assess how different dietary patterns affect these children’s gut microbiota. A comprehensive literature review conducted through the PubMed database identified 20 studies on gut microbiota and obesity in children, and 15 studies on the impact of different diets (Vegetarian, Western, Mediterranean) on the gut microbiota, with bacterial taxa names updated to the latest 2024 nomenclature. The bacillota phylum appears to be increased in individuals with obesity, while the bacteroidota phylum, on the contrary, is decreased, resulting in an increased Bacillota/Bacteroidota (B/B) ratio in children leading with obesity. The Mediterranean diet has been shown to improve bacterial diversity and to reduce inflammation, contrary to the Western diet (WD). Vegetarian diets have been shown to be a beneficial way to promote Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFA) production. Additional larger studies are needed to evaluate this issue, as differences in findings are observed, especially in pediatric population, when assessing the gut microbiota.
Keywords: Gut microbiota, Childhood obesity, Dietary patterns, Gut modulation
Key points
Children with obesity show an increased bacillota and a decreased bacteroidota phylum.
Pediatric subjects with obesity appear to have a higher bacillota/bacteroidota (B/B) ratio.
The Mediterranean and Vegetarian diets enhance bacteria diversity, contrary to the Western diet.
Introduction
Childhood obesity
Obesity rates have increased during the last decades, being considered as a crucial public health issue. According to the most recent data published from the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2022 one in eight people lived with obesity. Among children and adolescents between 5 and 19 years of age, more than 390 million suffered from overweight including 160 million living with obesity (1). In Spain, the ALADINO study in 2023 showed that more than 17% of Spanish children aged 6 to 9 suffered from obesity (2).
The WHO defines obesity as an abnormal or excessive fat accumulation [1]. In adults, obesity is defined as having a body mass index (BMI) over 30 kg/m2 [1]. However, in children, BMI reference is not useful for young people, as the age needs to be considered, thus growth curves were developed by the WHO. For children under 5 years old, obesity is defined as presenting a weight-for-height or a BMI for age over 3 standard deviations above the median Child Growth Standards, while for children between 5 and 19 years old, above 2 standard deviations from the WHO reference median [3]. The “Fundación Faustino Orbegozo” developed specific growth curves for children. Those above the 97th percentile, considering the BMI for age, were considered as suffering from obesity [4].
Experiencing obesity at a young age, may increase the risk of adult obesity by five times [5]. Indeed, more than half of children who develop obesity during childhood are likely to continue experiencing obesity into adolescence, and of those adolescents suffering from excess body weight, up to 80% will continue in the adulthood. This early onset of obesity will lead to various health complications, including cardiovascular problems like hypertension and atherosclerosis [6, 7], metabolic disorders such as dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [6, 7], gastrointestinal problems such as reflux [6], pulmonary conditions such as asthma and sleep apnea [6–8], as well as orthopedic complications like osteoarthritis [6].
Causes of obesity are wide ranged [9], and given this multifactorial etiology, many conditions play a role, such as genetics, biological, psychological, behavioral, environmental, individual, sociodemographic, health and socioeconomic status [10]. All these items could affect energy intake, which may result in a caloric imbalance due to consuming more calories than expended, leading to excess body weight [11]. Indeed, another factor that is under study and may play a key role in the development of obesity is the gut microbiota, as it has been lately considered as an endocrine organ with the ability of maintaining energy homeostasis [12], body weight control and inflammation, thus playing a potential role in the onset of obesity [13]. Notably, the gut microbiota has been found to have a relevant impact on overall energy balance, as it is involved in the entire digestion process through interactions between microorganisms and the host´s metabolism [14], so it can be a potential target for treating and preventing obesity [15]. In addition, different dietary patterns seem to alter the composition of the gut microbiota, and thus, have a crucial impact on weight and adiposity [16], as well as in the adequate functioning of the organism, as the interaction with the host leads to the synthesis of metabolites that exert either positive or negative effects on human health [17].
Although gut microbiota undergoes changes along the different stages of life [18], it has fundamental roles in immunological, metabolic, structural and neurological aspects of the human body. In addition, it also plays a role in the physical and mental well-being of individuals [19]. Indeed, gut microbiota not only acts on the digestive tract, but also sends and receives signals to and from the brain which can regulate appetite and act on eating behavior. This is commonly known as the “gut-brain axis”, a bidirectional connection between the gut and brain through the central and the enteric nervous system, mainly by neural, endocrine and immunological pathways [20, 21].
Gut microbiota. Formation, composition and functions
The gut microbiota refers to the complex and diverse community of trillions of microorganisms that reside in the gastrointestinal tract, which include predominantly bacteria, but also viruses, and single-cells eukaryotes as protozoa and fungi [22, 23]. With regards to bacteria, more than 1500 different species exist, with different composition/richness in each part of the gastrointestinal tract, varying in the stomach, small and large intestine [24, 25]. Gut microbiota is composed of numerous bacteria species classified by genus, family, order, class and phylum [26]. Metagenomic studies refer that 90% of the total microbiota is constituted by five different phyla: bacteroidota, bacillota, actinomycetota, pseudomonadota, and verrucomicrobiota, although more than 50 phyla shape the gut microbiota, but the first two are the most prevalent ones [25]. First, bacteroidota stand out the most, both by being one of the most abundant species, up to 30% of the total microbiota, and by participating in numerous physiological processes for optimal body functioning [27]. Bacteroidota phylum, which is gram-negative, is made up by bacteroides and prevotella genera [28]. Going to the next phylum in importance, bacillota is gram-positive and is composed mainly by lactobacillus, bacillus, clostridium, enterococcus and ruminococcus genera [26]. In addition, regarding actinomycetota phylum, bifidobacterium is the most common genus in it [29]. However, it is important to note that up to date, there is no healthy microbiota composition, as it varies between individuals [26]. When studying gut microbiota, we can differentiate between α-diversity, which measures the richness and abundance of microbiota species within one sample; and β-diversity which measures the variability within two different communities, to look for similarities or dissimilarities [30].
To identify the composition of the microbiota, three different methods can be used [31, 32]. The first is bacterial culture, which allows the quantification of viable microorganisms; however, it presents a major limitation, as only around 20% of bacterial species are culturable under standard laboratory conditions [33]. The second approach is metataxonomics, defined as the estimation of the total DNA taxonomic composition through next-generation sequencing of the 16 S rRNA gene. This widely used technique targets conserved and variable regions of the 16 S rRNA gene to enable community-wide taxonomic classification. Nevertheless, it requires PCR amplification, which may cause several methodological limitations and biases. Primer mismatches can result in preferential amplification of certain taxa, as primers bind to regions that are not fully conserved across all bacterial species, leading to distorted estimates of community composition [34]. Moreover, because this method targets only a small region of the bacterial genome, its taxonomic resolution is limited, typically at the genus level, and it cannot reliably discriminate between closely related species. The third approach, metagenomics, overcomes PCR-related biases and is not restricted solely to bacterial sequences. By covering the entire genomic content of the sample beyond the 16 S rRNA gene, shotgun metagenomic sequencing enables comprehensive taxonomic identification and functional characterization across all microbial domains.
The formation of the gut microbiota starts as early as during gestation. Studies have shown that the mothers’ placenta contains these microorganisms, indicating that transmissions between mother and child can occur during this period [35]. The children’s gut microbiota formation is a dynamic process, affected by numerous factors. The mode of delivery influences it, observing more diversity through vaginal delivery than with cesarean one [36]. The type of feeding, more precisely the introduction of complementary feeding or the children´s diet can also modulate the microbiota [37], as well as the consumption of antibiotics, which reduces the diversity of it [36]. Indeed, the microbiota is not firmly established until the age of three, when it can then be compared to the microbiota of adults [38]. This period is essential, since the microbiota of children responds much more to external factors and environmental influences than the one in adults [39]. The age [40], as well as the environment, gender, location, genetics, pets, maternal diet, climate, habits, exercise or BMI are other factors that can affect the composition of the gut microbiota [26, 41]. However, although several factors seem to modulate the microbiota, the diet appears to be the most relevant one, highlighting that the study of it is of great importance for thoroughly understanding the physiological state of children [41].
Gut microbiota and obesity: biological mechanisms
Gut microbiota is thought to play a key role in the development of obesity, as it is involved in energy homeostasis, participating in extracting energy by fermentation and formation of SCFA [42]. Increased concentrations of SCFA, including propionate, acetate and butyrate have been observed in children with obesity. Studies report that the bacillota phylum is the most effective in extracting energy from the bolus that reach the large intestine, which increases the amount of energy absorbed and therefore the probability of gaining weight [42]. This fact may explain why children with obesity appear to have increased concentrations of bacillota phylum, and a decrease in the bacteroidota phylum. In that sense, the B/B ratio in children is of interest and differences in this ratio have been observed when comparing children that present obesity or healthy ones [43]. Indeed, a situation that can be found in the gut microbiota is dysbiosis. This occurs when there is a decrease in beneficial species and an expansion of non-beneficial species, leading to both a loss of diversity and an alteration in the composition and functional activity of the gut microbiota compared to that observed in healthy individuals [44]. In this context, the aim of this narrative review was to examine the microbiota of children with obesity, with a particular focus on the bacillota/bacteroidota ratio, specific microbiota taxa and the relationship between childhood obesity and SCFA. In addition, a secondary objective was to differentiate the gut composition depending on their dietary patterns, regardless of weight status.
Methodology
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed database to identify relevant studies. To ensure the relevance and quality of the selected studies, only articles published in English before May 2024 were included. Studies analyzing gut microbiota in individuals aged 0 to 18 years were selected. The variability in participant age ranges across individual studies is identified as a methodological limitation of this review, which will be addressed in the discussion. For the first objective, we employed a combination of the following keywords: Gut microbiota, child, obesity, firmicutes, bacteroidetes and firmicutes/bacteroidetes ratio. After an extensive and thorough review of the literature, a total of 20 original articles were selected that met the criteria established for this review. Additionally, we further searched for the role of SCFA on specific articles derived from those originally chosen. For the second objective, we searched for studies using the keywords Vegetarian diet, Western diet, Mediterranean diet, child, and gut microbiota. Following a review of the literature, a total of 15 studies were selected based on their relevance to the research question. After careful assessment, we ultimately retained four studies focused on the Vegetarian diet (VD), five studies examining the Western diet (WD), and six studies that investigated the Mediterranean diet (MD). In this review, the names of the bacteria taxa have been updated according to the latest 2024 nomenclature [45], to reflect the most recent taxonomic updates and to promote more inclusive and precise scientific communication. However, it is important to note that the original articles included in this review used previous nomenclature.
Bacillota/Bacteroidota (B/B) in childhood obesity
An increase in the ratio B/B is a condition that appears to be common in population suffering from obesity. Although there are numerous bacterial species, alterations in the bacillota and bacteroidota phyla seem predominant when suffering from obesity. Indeed, one of the first studies performed in 2005 in mice already showed these findings: the B/B ratio was increased in obese mice and decreased in lean ones [46]. One of the latest systematic reviews performed in 2020 included numerous studies in humans and showed the same results: individuals with obesity presented a higher B/B ratio [47]. Thus, B/B ratio seems to be an indicator of obesity in adults. However, in children, few articles have been published about B/B ratio; little is known, and results appear to be contradictory (Table 1).
Table 1.
Bacillota, bacteroidotaandB/B ratio in childhood obesity
* Studies in which cultures have been used.
Abreviations: B/B ratio= Bacillota/Bacteroidota ratio; BMI=body mass index; BF=body fat; perc=percentile
If we compare the bacillota phylum in children with obesity against healthy weight ones, the abundance of this phylum seems to increase along with the BMI [48, 49]. A recent study in southeastern China in 2024 reported that the proportion of bacillota considerably increased from 49.8% in normal-weight children to 63.5% in children suffering from obesity, whereas the proportion of bacteroidota decreased from 37.7% to 18.5% in children living with obesity [50]. Other numerous studies support these same findings [51, 52]. Indiani et al. indicated a decrease in bacteroidota phylum and in bacteroides and prevotella genera among children with higher BMI, as well as an increase in bacillota phylum associated to a higher abundance of clostridium, eubacterium and lactobacillus [52]. Ma et al. reported an increase in bacillota and a decrease in bacteroidota phylum in the intestinal microbiota of children presenting obesity, highlighting some genus as faecalibacterium, tyzzerella or klebsiella, which could be considered as biomarkers for obesity in children aged 3 to 5 years [53]. Another study in older children found that within the phylum bacillota, the species streptococcus thermophilus and the genus acidaminococcus; within the phylum bacteroidota, the species prevotella copri; and within the phylum pseudomonadota, the species sutterella wadsworthensis were all positively associated with obesity [54]. Thus, an increase in bacillota phylum and a decrease in the bacteroidota one entails an increase in B/B ratio, as observed in various studies performed in children [55, 56].
However, not all the bibliography supports these findings. Several studies found no relationship between the B/B ratio and BMI, even finding a lower B/B ratio in children with obesity. Houtman et al. aimed to explore whether the bacillota phylum or the bacteroidota one was each individually associated to obesity during infancy and found no correlation to it [57]. Indeed, a study in Korean children found no significant difference between B/B ratio in children with obesity and those with normal weight [60]. Another study performed only in girls found a positive association between bacillota phylum and waist circumference, but not with BMI or body fat percentage [58]. Cho et al. performed a nutritional intervention in children aged 7 to 18. Children who achieved a reduction in body fat presented a decrease in bacteroidota phylum (bacteroides genus), and an increase in the bacillota phylum (clostridia genus), whereas participants who increased weight and body fat, presented a decrease on the bacillota phylum (clostridia genus), contrary to what was expected [59].
In this sense, although it is common to use the B/B ratio to evaluate the association of gut microbiota with ponderal status, heterogeneity is common when assessing it in children. Indeed, recent findings support the idea that instead of using the B/B ratio for associating the presence of obesity, SCFA production could be of interest [56]. The results obtained from the studies included in this review are highly heterogeneous, which may be explained by several factors. First, the populations analyzed differ in terms of age, developmental stage, and BMI, all of which are known to influence gut microbiota composition. Moreover, lifestyle-related factors such as diet, physical activity, and environmental exposures may also contribute to these discrepancies. Methodological aspects play a crucial role as well, since the studies employed different approaches for microbiota characterization each with distinct taxonomic resolution. In addition, the observed variability might also be related to differences in gender, genetic background, and environmental conditions, as the target population is heterogeneous and undergoing a growth period that involves significant physiological changes affecting gut microbiota stability and composition. Given the limited number of studies addressing this topic in children, further research with larger sample sizes and standardized methodologies is needed to confirm these findings. Therefore, the B/B ratio is not a reliable biomarker for childhood obesity. Given these limitations, examining microbial metabolites such as SCFAs may offer a more precise and mechanistic understanding of how gut microbiota influences pediatric obesity.
Beyond microbiota compositional analyses, the functional effects of the gut microbiota, particularly SCFAs, provide critical insights into the mechanisms that link the microbiota and pediatric obesity. The quantity and quality of dietary fiber strongly influence gut composition and, consequently, SCFA production. SCFAs (mainly acetate, propionate, and butyrate) are essential for metabolic health, contributing up to 10% of daily caloric requirements and serving as the main energy substrate for colonocytes, while also supporting intestinal barrier function by reducing permeability [61]. Through interaction with G protein receptors (GPR41 and GPR43) [62], they modulate enteroendocrine hormones such as GLP-1 and PYY [63], thereby influencing appetite regulation, lipogenesis, glucose homeostasis, and overall energy balance [61, 64]. Early life SCFA exposure, affected by maternal diet, delivery mode or breastmilk composition, may differentially program immune responses and adiposity trajectories in children [65–68]. Additionally, SCFAs act as critical signaling molecules in the gut-brain axis, influencing neurodevelopment, neuroinflammation, and behavior, with implications for pediatric obesity, anxiety, depression, and neurodevelopmental disorders [69]. Across reviewed studies, SCFAs consistently appear as central mediators between gut microbiota composition and obesity in children, but their role is complex and context-dependent. Some studies reported reduced butyrate and isobutyrate and increased caproate concentrations in children with obesity, reflecting disrupted fermentation pathways [70]. These changes were accompanied by a decrease in the abundance of butyrate producing bacteria such as Oscillibacter and increased activity of potentially harmful fecal enzymes (β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase). This supports the idea that obesity-related microbial shifts impair the production of beneficial metabolites and promote gut-derived metabolic stress [71]. In contrast, other studies found elevated fecal SCFA concentrations in children with obesity (notably acetate, propionate, and butyrate) [72], as well as positive correlations between total SCFAs and regional body fat distribution, including android and gynoid regions [73]. These results indicate that elevated SCFA levels may not always reflect protective metabolic activity but could instead represent increased microbial fermentation due to greater substrate availability and caloric intake. Indeed, recent evidence suggests that alterations in SCFA levels observed in obesity may result from gut microbiota dysbiosis, leading to disrupted fermentation processes and metabolic imbalances [74]. Other studies highlight the dual role of SCFAs. On one hand, they serve as an energy source for colonocytes, enhance intestinal barrier integrity, and modulate appetite-regulating hormones such as GLP-1 and PYY through G protein-coupled receptors. On the other hand, excessive SCFA production may contribute additional calories, influence insulin secretion, and promote lipid storage, thereby favoring weight gain under certain metabolic contexts [64]. Overall, the evidence highlights a dual role of SCFAs in pediatric obesity. While adequate SCFA production supports intestinal and metabolic health, excessive or dysregulated SCFA generation may provide additional energy to the host and promote adiposity. Thus, SCFA metabolism may act both as a marker and mediator of obesity-related microbial alterations. The direction of this association, protective or pathogenic, appears to depend on microbial composition, substrate availability, and host metabolic context. Future longitudinal and mechanistic studies are needed to determine whether targeted modulation of SCFA production through dietary or microbiota-based interventions could effectively prevent or manage childhood obesity.
Dietary patterns and gut microbiota
As discussed previously, diet plays a key role in the development, maturation, and modulation of gut microbiota in children. A detailed understanding of how different dietary patterns influence pediatric gut microbiota is still needed. The composition of the diet, the proportion of macro and micronutrients and their sources will thus play a key role in shaping the gut microbiota. Dietary changes can modulate its composition rapidly and thus, affect the host´s health and metabolism [75]. Establishing enduring healthy dietary patterns is vital not only for influencing human health but also for maintaining a rich diversity and abundant microbial ecosystem within the gastrointestinal tract, commonly referred to as “eubiosis,” while preventing the appearance of “dysbiosis” [76].
It is important to note that breastfeeding or milk formulas have a significant impact on the gut composition. Breastfeeding has been associated with increased abundance of beneficial bifidobacterium, improved immune system function, reduced risk of infections, and a more stable gut microbiota [77]. One of the last metanalysis concluded that breastfeeding is essential for the homeostatic development of the infant gut microbiota, highlighting the short- and long-term benefits that entails it [78]. All this is probably due to the presence of human milk oligosaccharides (galactooligosaccharides) which are the third most abundant components and are present in maternal milk [79]. They play a key role for inhibiting the growth of pathogens’ families such as clostridiaceae, enterobacteriaceae, and staphylococcaceae through the production of SCFA [80]. On the other hand, formula feeding has been positively associated with increased microbiota diversity, particularly in clostridiales and pseudomonadales, but with lower levels of bifidobacteriales order. It has also been correlated with a more diverse and mature microbiota, and a gut composition like the adult one [78]. In addition, it has been associated with increased bacterial pathogens, which could have an impact on human health [77].
The introduction of complementary feeding plays an important role in shaping the gut microbiota. After breastfeeding or formula-feeding, the transition to the introduction of solid foods is linked to a change in both the structural and functional microbiota diversity of the infant, whose final goal is the establishment of a mature intestinal microbiota similar to the one of adults [76]. Substantial changes tend to occur in this period, characterized by an increase in diversity, accompanied by alterations in communities of bacteria [81]. This transition involves a shift from a predominance of bifidobacterium (actinomycetota phylum), to communities dominated by bacteroidota and bacillota [82]. The introduction of solid foods fosters the growth of beneficial taxa such as bifidobacterium, lactobacillus, and bacteroides [83]. Vegetable consumption, rich in fermentable fibers, enhances the populations of bacteroides and bifidobacterium [84]; while protein consumption increases levels of clostridium and streptococcus bacteria [85]. Thus, considerable changes tend to happen in microbiota composition. The timing of introducing solid foods is also of relevant interest [82]. Early introduction of complementary feeding has been linked to an increased exposure to allergens, bacterial pathogens as well as possible alterations in the immune system and oxidative stress [86, 87]. Research indicates that introducing complementary feeding before 3 months of age may lead to alterations in gut microbiota composition and SCFA profiles. Although butyrate is generally considered beneficial due to its anti-inflammatory and gut barrier protective properties, early shifts in gut microbiota may indicate imbalances in SCFA production or microbial function, potentially influencing metabolic outcomes and increasing susceptibility to obesity later in life [82]. Conversely, a delayed introduction of complementary feeding has been associated with slower maturation and development of the gut microbiota [87]. Therefore, achieving an optimal timing is essential, with current recommendations from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) suggesting the introduction of complementary foods no later than 6 months of age to ensure the greatest health benefits [88].
After the introduction of complementary feeding, children may adopt various dietary patterns influenced by factors such as family preferences, cultural habits, socioeconomic status, geographic location, and other variables that impact nutritional habits. In that sense, our dietary choices play a significant role in shaping the gut microbiota, with different dietary patterns exerting distinct effects on microbiota composition (Fig. 1; Table 2).
Fig. 1.
Diets, bacillota and bacteroidota phylum, B/B ratio, and SCFA production
Table 2.
Diets and microbiota composition associated to them
MD=Mediterranean Diet; VD=Vegan Diet; WD=Western Diet.
In this context, we opted for examining the Western, Mediterranean and Vegetarian diets. These dietary patterns were selected because they represent distinct dietary approaches with substantial differences in food composition and nutrient intake. The Western diet is typically high in processed foods, saturated fats, and refined sugars, which have been associated with alterations in gut microbiota composition. In contrast, the Mediterranean diet is rich in fiber, healthy fats, and polyphenols, which are known to promote microbial diversity and beneficial gut bacteria. Meanwhile, the vegetarian diet is primarily plant-based, leading to a higher intake of fiber and plant-derived bioactive compounds, which can significantly influence gut microbiota composition. By examining these three contrasting dietary patterns, we aim to better understand their potential impact on the gut microbiota of children, regardless of weight status.
Mediterranean dietary pattern
The Mediterranean Diet (MD) can be defined as a healthy dietary pattern prevalent in Mediterranean countries as Spain, Greece or Italy whose intake is primarily based on cereals, legumes, vegetables, fruits and olive oil [89]. It has countless health benefits, many of them associated to the type of fat present (olive oil, fish, and nuts), to the proportion of macronutrients (carbohydrates = 40–65%; fat = 28–40%; protein = 10–35%) [90] and to the abundance of micronutrients, derived from the consumption of vegetables, aromatic herbs, and spices. The decalogue of the MD encompasses the following statements: elevated consumption of extra virgin olive oil, vegetable origin products, particularly greens, fruits, cereals, nuts, and legumes, with moderated intake of fish, meat, dairy products, and red wine. Additionally, they advocate for a moderate consumption of eggs and a limited and occasional consumption of sweets [91].
In that sense, when evaluating the effect of the MD on gut microbiota, most of the studies were performed in adults. The MD has been associated with greater bacterial diversity, enriching the gut microbiota [92] and being favorable for overall health [93]. Data demonstrate that the microbiota from individuals who tend to adopt a Mediterranean dietary pattern differs drastically from the ones following a western pattern [93], and the MD has even shown effects in reducing dysbiosis [94]. Regarding taxa, the MD has been associated to an increase in bacteroidota phylum. Studies indicate that this may be attributed to the consumption of fiber, present in carbohydrates and vegetables [95], and protein [75]. Indeed, a decrease in bacillota phylum is also typical when following a MD pattern, which all this makes the MD to be associated with a lower B/B ratio [96]. In adults, diets rich in fiber and unsaturated fatty acids, as MD, are associated with high levels of beneficial bacteria that contribute to the reduction of inflammation, oxidative stress and overall health [97], such as bacteroides, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, faecalibacterium, oscillospira, roseburia, ruminococci, clostridium cluster, ruminiclostridium leptum, eubacterium rectale; and lower levels of bacillota, pseudomonadota and blautia [93, 97, 98]. Another study found the MD significantly increased the abundance of enterorhabdus, lachnoclostridium and parabacteroides, as well as increasing the SCFA production, contributing to the protective properties and lower inflammation associated to the MD [99]. One last study mentioned that polyphenols associated to the dietary compounds (fruits, vegetables, cereals, tea, coffee) of the MD increased the number of enterococcus, prevotella, bacteroides, and bifidobacterium [98].
The literature about the impact of diets on microbiota composition in children is still limited. A comparative study was performed to examine microbiota disparities between children and adolescents in Egypt and in the U.S., who adhered to MD and WD, respectively. The findings indicated that Egyptian individuals exhibited a microbiota predominantly composed of prevotella, whereas the U.S. samples were dominated by bacteroides. Children from Egypt showed higher levels of SCFA and tended to experience greater bacteriophage pressure. Conversely, the gut of U.S. children exhibited greater richness in amino acids and lipid metabolism-related compounds; had greater number of microbial genes that encode protein degradation, vitamin biosynthesis, and iron acquisition pathways; and was enriched with protein and starch degrading genera [100]. Interestingly, the abundances of faecalibacterium and akkermansia, two genera recognized for their anti-inflammatory and gut barrier–protective properties, were elevated in the guts of U.S. individuals [100]. This result may appear counterintuitive, as a Western dietary pattern is typically associated with a reduction in akkermansia muciniphila richness, a key mucin-degrading bacterium crucial for maintaining intestinal integrity [101]. However, several factors could explain these findings. First, the Western diet is highly heterogeneous across populations, and its composition may differ substantially depending on fat quality, fiber, and polyphenol intake, which are known to modulate akkermansia and faecalibacterium abundance. For instance, higher consumption of unsaturated fats or polyphenol-rich foods within certain subgroups may counterbalance the detrimental effects of saturated fat intake. Second, akkermansia abundance is strongly influenced by host-related factors such as metabolic status or antibiotic exposure, which may vary between cohorts and partially explain interpopulation differences [102, 103]. Furthermore, genus-level taxonomic resolution derived from 16 S rRNA sequencing might mask species or strain specific responses, as not all akkermansia lineages exhibit the same ecological or metabolic traits. Therefore, the observed enrichment of these beneficial taxa in the U.S. group likely reflects a complex interaction between dietary composition, lifestyle, and host physiology rather than a direct consequence of the Western diet.
Vegetarian and flexitarian dietary patterns
According to the Spanish Paediatric Association, vegetarian diets are “those that are free of meat and meat products and fish (including shellfish and its derivatives)”. According to the type of vegetarian diet, “it can include eggs or dairy products (ovo/lacto-vegetarian) or exclude any products of animal origin, including honey (vegan diet)” [104]. In addition, a flexitarian diet includes all the aforementioned characteristics, but it can include meat consumption in reduced amounts [105]. These dietary patterns, such as the Mediterranean and vegetarian diets, have been associated with a reduced risk of obesity and other non-communicable diseases. However, certain vegan diets may require specific nutrient supplementation, particularly vitamin B12, to ensure adequate nutritional intake and prevent potential deficiencies [106].
A study conducted in children from a rural area of Burkina Faso (BF) and Europe revealed that kids from BF exhibited a higher proportion of bacteroidota phylum and a lower one of bacillota phylum (73% bacteroidota and 12% bacillota), compared to children from different areas of Europe (27% bacteroidota and 51% bacillota) [107]. These differences are likely related to dietary patterns, as children from BF consume diets rich in complex carbohydrates derived from plant-based foods, whereas European diets are increasingly characterized by higher saturated fat intake and lower fiber content due to the global adoption of Westernized eating habits. Although the traditional Mediterranean diet, originating in Europe, is rich in fats, these are predominantly unsaturated and associated with beneficial effects on gut microbiota composition. Consumption of plant-based products containing dietary fibers serves as the primary energy source for gut-residing microorganisms, involved in the production of acetate, propionate, and butyrate [108]. The microbiota species associated with elevated SCFA production include akkermansia, lachnospira, lactobacillus, bifidobacterium, roseburia, ruminococcus, clostridium, faecalibacterium, and dorea [109]. Akkermansia, specially akkermansia muciniphila, plays a key role in maintaining the intestinal barrier by degrading mucin and has been linked to improved metabolic profiles and reduced inflammation [110]. Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium are well-known beneficial genera involved in carbohydrate fermentation, lactic acid production, immune modulation, and protection against pathogens [111, 112]. Lachnospira, dorea, roseburia, faecalibacterium, ruminococcus, and certain clostridium are important SCFAs producers, mainly butyrate, contributing to colonic epithelial health and exhibiting anti-inflammatory properties. Altogether, these taxa contribute to gut homeostasis, metabolic regulation, and host immune balance. Another study found that vegan diets changed the abundance of the following bacteria genera, increasing anaerostipes and decreasing streptococcus, clostridium sensustricto, and odoribacter [99]. This may be beneficial for children, as a higher abundance of anaerostipes has been linked to lower bone age and reduced levels of hormones such as LH and FSH [113]. However, a review performed by Glick-Bauer et al. found that vegan diets are related to lower levels of bacteroides, bifidobacterium and enterobacteriaceae [114], whereas Matijašić et al. referred that a vegetarian diet was associated with higher proportion of bacteroides, prevotella, clostridium, and faecalibacterium [115]. These differences can be associated to the wide variety of vegetarian diets, as the largest variation in microbiota composition is explained by the consumption of foods of animal origin (eggs, white meat, milk, yogurt, other dairy products, fish, and seafood), and thus, several vegetarian diets include and other exclude these dietary compounds [115]. From a physiological perspective, these bacterial shifts may have important implications for host metabolism and intestinal health. Bacteroides can produce all SCFAs, whereas prevotella is able to metabolize a wide variety of proteins and polysaccharides, producing propionate as one of its key fermentation metabolites [116, 117]. Its higher abundance in vegan diets is consistent with the increased fiber intake typical of such diets. Clostridium and faecalibacterium are major butyrate producers with anti-inflammatory properties that support colonocyte energy supply and intestinal homeostasis [117]. Pathogenic bacteria, especially members of the enterobacteriaceae family, and the toxic compounds they produce are associated with increased oxidative stress and inflammatory responses [118]. The reduction of these taxa in vegan diets contributes to lower inflammation and improved metabolic health. Children following vegan diets often show reduced levels of bifidobacterium, likely due to the absence of dairy products, which are a primary dietary source of these beneficial bacteria. This reduction may predispose to dysbiosis, affecting SCFA production and gut homeostasis [119]. Supplementation with bifidobacterium containing probiotics or fortified foods could help mitigate these effects. Consequently, the balance among these microbial groups may influence the overall metabolic and immunological effects of different plant based dietary patterns. It is also interesting to note that the microbiota of children whose mother consumed a vegetarian diet differed slightly. No differences were found in alpha diversity, but beta diversity was reduced in vegetarians. In addition, differences were seen in the abundance of several genera, specifically a reduction in collinsella and holdemania, and increases in the relative abundances of roseburia and lachnospiraceae family [120]. An increase in roseburia genus is particularly beneficial for children, as it has been associated with improvements in language, behavior, and motor cognitive skills [121]. In addition, increased abundance of collinsella has been linked to several conditions, including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, pro-inflammatory dysbiosis, and type 2 diabetes [122]. The lower proportion of this bacterium in vegan diets may therefore contribute to their beneficial metabolic and anti-inflammatory effects. Definitively, available literature articles state that a vegetarian or vegan diet is beneficial to promote the ecosystem and to support the microbiota [123], although significant bacterial differences can be seen depending on the type of vegetarian diet consumed.
Western dietary pattern
A Western Diet is characterized by an elevated consumption of fats, predominantly saturated fatty acids (SFA) and trans fatty acids (TFA), refined carbohydrates, sugar and salt. It includes palatable products such as fast food, soft drinks, highly processed foods, pre-packaged foods, red meat, alcohol, candy, sweets, fried foods, which are all high in unhealthy fats, sugar and salt, although there is no specific definition for it. This type of diet has been associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk [124]. Gut microbiota also suffers alterations when consuming these foods. Available literature regarding WD states that the ratio of B/B increases when high-fat diets are consumed. This is associated to higher bacillota and lower bacteroidota phylum [125]. An increase in B/B ratio when consuming sugary products has also been observed. Lactobacilus and bifidobacterium also appear to decrease when consuming high fats diets, sugar, salt and additives [101, 126, 127]. A decrease richness of akkermansia muciniphila is also a common characteristic of a WD, which is an important bacteria for the maintenance of the gut barrier [101]. A reduced intake of dietary fiber, characteristic of the WD, limits the production of SCFAs, key microbial metabolites with recognized benefits for host metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and weight regulation, as mentioned. The consequent decrease in SCFAs can contribute to gut dysbiosis and impair intestinal barrier integrity, immune regulation, and overall homeostasis, potentially increasing inflammation and susceptibility to metabolic and immune-related disorders [109, 128, 129].
In children, less bibliography is available. However, some studies have assessed the impact of the Westernized dietary pattern on the microbiota. A study conducted in Leyte Island [130] suggests that increased fat consumption correlates positively with the B/B ratio and negatively with the prevalence of the prevotella family. At the species level, fat intake shows a positive association with certain oscillibacter and bacteroides species. Oscillibacter appears to be more prevalent in children with obesity, which may be related to higher intake of a Western diet and the development of obesity [70]. Notably, overweight and obese children with high-fat diets appear to have a microbiota with elevated B/B ratios and reduced prevotella abundance. These changes in gut microbiota composition, specially prevotella, could serve as indicators of obesity, as several articles have shown correlations for it [54, 131, 132]. Another study analyzed the microbiota in children from a rural area from BF compared to children from Florence (Italy) who consumed a WD [133]. It is interesting to note that African children had several unique bacterial associated to rural areas, were westernized dietary patterns are lacking. These include prevotella, treponema, and succinivibrio, species that are responsible for fermenting fibers from vegetables and polysaccharides, and are lacking when consuming a WD. Prevotella, which ferments polysaccharides and proteins to produce propionate, tends to be less abundant under low-fiber conditions [116], potentially reducing its beneficial effects on glucose regulation and satiety. In addition, the same study mentions that the proportion of SCFA was reduced in Florence (WD) in respect to BF, indicating the urbanization and WD are of interest for shaping and modifying the microbiota [133]. Indeed, children with undernutrition, which is a global health issue in non-developed countries from Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, have increased pseudomonadota and decreased bacteroides [134]. This is consistent with other evidence indicating that pseudomonadota is more prevalent in stunted children, where it may contribute to disease, dysbiosis, and increased inflammation [135]. Another study that associated the dietary habits of American children with the microbiota showed that industrialized populations that consume food products high in animal protein and fats (WD) seem to have a lower diversity in the gut community [136].
This narrative review has some limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the inclusion of studies covering a broad pediatric age range (0–18 years) may introduce heterogeneity, as gut microbiota composition undergoes major developmental changes during the first years of life. Additionally, differences in study design, analytical techniques, and reporting methods further limit the comparability of findings across studies. Despite these limitations, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the current evidence linking gut microbiota and obesity in childhood.
Conclusion
B/B ratio tends to be increased in children with obesity, although research is not consistent in this population. Bacillota phylum seems to be increased in children with excess weight, and bacteroidota phylum, on the contrary, decreased. In addition, SCFA production could serve as a potential biomarker of pediatric obesity, reflecting gut microbiota metabolic activity. Current evidence suggests that children with obesity often exhibit higher fecal SCFA levels; however, further studies are needed to confirm these associations and clarify their underlying mechanisms. Diets play a key role for shaping and modulating the microbiota in children. MD has been shown to enhance bacterial diversity and decrease inflammation, whereas WD, which are rich in sugar, fat and salt, have been shown to decrease microbiota diversity and increase inflammation. Vegetarian diets are beneficial for promoting the production of SCFA. However, the differences found in the findings in children may be due to several factors as age, growth, gender or genetics. It is needed to perform larger studies in pediatric individuals due to the significant impact of different diets on children’s microbiota and thus, in overall health status.
Author contributions
All authors contributed actively to the planning and discussion of the paper. N.V-B. participated in the literature search and writing of the manuscript with the help, comment and advise of all other authors. M.C and S.N-C revised the paper.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. N.V-B. appreciates the predoctoral grant received from the Center for Nutrition Research of the University of Navarra. This research was supported by an FPU grant (Formación de Profesorado Universitario) from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation to Natalia Vázquez Bolea (FPU23/01950).
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Clinical trial number
Not applicable.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.WHO. World Health Organization Fact Sheets. Obesity and Overweight. [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 May 30]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight
- 2.Agencia Española de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición (AESAN) Estudio ALADINO 2023 sobre Alimentación, Actividad física, Desarrollo infantil y Obesidad. [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Nov 11]. Available from: https://www.aesan.gob.es/AECOSAN/docs/documentos/nutricion/ALADINO_AESAN.pdf
- 3.World Health Organization Fact sheet. Overweight and obesity. [Internet]. [cited 2024 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight
- 4.C Fernández HLKVUAIRES Estudio de crecimiento de Bilbao. Curvas y tablas de crecimiento. [Internet]. [cited 2024 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.fundacionorbegozo.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/estudios_2011.pdf
- 5.Simmonds M, Llewellyn A, Owen CG, Woolacott N (2016) Predicting adult obesity from childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 17(2):95–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Daniels SR (2009) Complications of obesity in children and adolescents. Int J Obes 33(S1):S60–S65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Koyuncuoğlu Güngör N (2014) Overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 129–143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Kerns J, Fisher M (2020) Epidemiology, pathophysiology and etiology of obesity in children and adolescents. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 50(9):100869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thomas-Eapen N (2021) Childhood obesity. Prim Care Clin Office Pract 48(3):505–515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Safaei M, Sundararajan EA, Driss M, Boulila W, Shapi’i A (2021) A systematic literature review on obesity: understanding the causes & consequences of obesity and reviewing various machine learning approaches used to predict obesity. Comput Biol Med 136:104754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Smith JD, Fu E, Kobayashi MA (2020) Prevention and management of childhood obesity and its psychological and health comorbidities. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 16(1):351–378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gomes AC, Hoffmann C, Mota JF (2018) The human gut microbiota: metabolism and perspective in obesity. Gut Microbes 1–18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Sanchez M, Panahi S, Tremblay A (2014) Childhood obesity: a role for gut microbiota? Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(1):162–175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Abenavoli L, Scarpellini E, Colica C, Boccuto L, Salehi B, Sharifi-Rad J et al (2019) Gut microbiota and obesity: A role for probiotics. Nutrients 11(11):2690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Santos-Paulo S, Costello SP, Forster SC, Travis SP, Bryant RV (2022) The gut microbiota as a therapeutic target for obesity: a scoping review. Nutr Res Rev 35(2):207–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nova E, Gómez-Martinez S, González-Soltero R (2022) The influence of dietary factors on the gut microbiota. Microorganisms 10(7):1368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu J, Tan Y, Cheng H, Zhang D, Feng W, Peng C (2022) Functions of gut microbiota metabolites, current status and future perspectives. Aging Dis 13(4):1106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Cuevillas B, Milagro FI, Tur JA, Gil-Campos M, de Miguel‐Etayo P, Martínez JA et al (2022) Fecal microbiota relationships with childhood obesity: A scoping comprehensive review. Obes Rev 23:S1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Adak A, Khan MR (2019) An insight into gut microbiota and its functionalities. Cell Mol Life Sci 76(3):473–493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Asadi A, Shadab Mehr N, Mohamadi MH, Shokri F, Heidary M, Sadeghifard N et al (2022) Obesity and gut–microbiota–brain axis: a narrative review. J Clin Lab Anal 36(5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Li S, Liu M, Cao S, Liu B, Li D, Wang Z et al (2023) The mechanism of the Gut-Brain axis in regulating food intake. Nutrients 15(17):3728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thursby E, Juge N (2017) Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem J 474(11):1823–1836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Garcia-Bonete MJ, Rajan A, Suriano F, Layunta E (2023) The underrated gut microbiota helminths, bacteriophages, fungi, and archaea. Life 13(8):1765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Faith JJ, Guruge JL, Charbonneau M, Subramanian S, Seedorf H, Goodman AL et al (2013) The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science (1979) 341(6141) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Gomaa EZ (2020) Human gut microbiota/microbiome in health and diseases: a review. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113(12):2019–2040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, Franceschi F, Miggiano G, Gasbarrini A et al (2019) What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across Age, Environment, Diet, and diseases. Microorganisms 7(1):14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.O’Hara AM, Shanahan F (2006) The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Rep 7(7):688–693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sebastián Domingo JJ (2017) Sánchez Sánchez C. From the intestinal flora to the Microbiome. Revista Española De Enfermedades Digestivas 110 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR et al (2011) Enterotypes of the human gut Microbiome. Nature 473(7346):174–180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Walters KE, Martiny JBH (2020) Alpha-, beta-, and gamma-diversity of bacteria varies across habitats. PLoS ONE 15(9):e0233872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hilton SK, Castro-Nallar E, Pérez-Losada M, Toma I, McCaffrey TA, Hoffman EP et al (2016) Metataxonomic and metagenomic approaches vs. Culture-based techniques for clinical pathology. Front Microbiol 7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Costa M, Weese JS (2019) Methods and basic concepts for microbiota assessment. Vet J 249:10–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M et al (1979) Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 2005;308(5728):1635–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gupta S, Mortensen MS, Schjørring S, Trivedi U, Vestergaard G, Stokholm J et al (2019) Amplicon sequencing provides more accurate Microbiome information in healthy children compared to culturing. Commun Biol 2(1):291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wopereis H, Oozeer R, Knipping K, Belzer C, Knol J (2014) The first thousand days – intestinal microbiology of early life: establishing a symbiosis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 25(5):428–438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vandenplas Y, Carnielli VP, Ksiazyk J, Luna MS, Migacheva N, Mosselmans JM et al (2020) Factors affecting early-life intestinal microbiota development. Nutrition 78:110812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Xu J, Lawley B, Wong G, Otal A, Chen L, Ying TJ et al (2020) Ethnic diversity in infant gut microbiota is apparent before the introduction of complementary diets. Gut Microbes 11(5):1362–1373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Avershina E, Lundgård K, Sekelja M, Dotterud C, Storrø O, Øien T et al (2016) Transition from infant- to adult‐like gut microbiota. Environ Microbiol 18(7):2226–2236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Laursen MF, Bahl MI, Licht TR (2021) Settlers of our inner surface – factors shaping the gut microbiota from birth to toddlerhood. FEMS Microbiol Rev 45(4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Odamaki T, Kato K, Sugahara H, Hashikura N, Takahashi S, Xiao J, zhong et al (2016) Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol 16(1):90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Laursen MF (2021) Gut microbiota development: influence of diet from infancy to toddlerhood. Ann Nutr Metab 77(Suppl 3):21–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Krajmalnik-Brown R, Ilhan Z, Kang D, DiBaise JK (2012) Effects of gut microbes on nutrient absorption and energy regulation. Nutr Clin Pract 27(2):201–214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Magne F, Gotteland M, Gauthier L, Zazueta A, Pesoa S, Navarrete P et al (2020) The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio: a relevant marker of gut dysbiosis in obese patients? Nutrients 12(5):1474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Petersen C, Round JL (2014) Defining dysbiosis and its influence on host immunity and disease. Cell Microbiol 16(7):1024–1033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Oren A (2024) On validly published names, correct names, and changes in the nomenclature of phyla and genera of prokaryotes: a guide for the perplexed. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 10(1):20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ley RE, Bäckhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Gordon JI (2005) Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(31):11070–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Crovesy L, Masterson D, Rosado EL (2020) Profile of the gut microbiota of adults with obesity: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr 74(9):1251–1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Da Silva CC, Monteil MA, Davis EM (2020) Overweight and obesity in children are associated with an abundance of firmicutes and reduction of bifidobacterium in their Gastrointestinal microbiota. Child Obes 16(3):204–210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Orbe-Orihuela YC, Lagunas-Martínez A, Bahena-Román M, Madrid-Marina V, Torres-Poveda K, Flores-Alfaro E et al (2017) High relative abundance of firmicutes and increased TNF-α levels correlate with obesity in children. Salud Publica Mex 60(1):5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang J, Zhuang P, Lin B, Li H, Zheng J, Tang W et al (2024) Gut microbiota profiling in obese children from southeastern China. BMC Pediatr 24(1):193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sepp E, Lõivukene K, Julge K, Voor T, Mikelsaar M (2013) The association of gut microbiota with body weight and body mass index in preschool children of Estonia. Microb Ecol Health Dis 24(0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Indiani CM, dos Rizzardi SP, Castelo KF, Ferraz PM, Darrieux LFC, Parisotto M (2018) Childhood obesity and Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the gut microbiota: A systematic review. Child Obes 14(8):501–509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ma T, Wu Z, Lin J, Shan C, Abasijiang A, Zhao J (2023) Characterization of the oral and gut microbiome in children with obesity aged 3 to 5 years. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Squillario M, Bonaretti C, La Valle A, Di Marco E, Piccolo G, Minuto N et al (2023) Gut-microbiota in children and adolescents with obesity: inferred functional analysis and machine-learning algorithms to classify microorganisms. Sci Rep 13(1):11294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bervoets L, Van Hoorenbeeck K, Kortleven I, Van Noten C, Hens N, Vael C et al (2013) Differences in gut microbiota composition between obese and lean children: a cross-sectional study. Gut Pathog 5(1):10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Riva A, Borgo F, Lassandro C, Verduci E, Morace G, Borghi E et al (2017) Pediatric obesity is associated with an altered gut microbiota and discordant shifts in Firmicutes populations. Environ Microbiol 19(1):95–105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Houtman TA, Eckermann HA, Smidt H, de Weerth C (2022) Gut microbiota and BMI throughout childhood: the role of firmicutes, bacteroidetes, and short-chain fatty acid producers. Sci Rep 12(1):3140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Miranda VPN, dos Santos Amorim PR, Bastos RR, de Faria ER, de Castro Moreira ME, do, Carmo Castro Franceschini S et al (2019) Abundance of Gut Microbiota, concentration of short-chain fatty acids, and inflammatory markers associated with elevated body fat, overweight, and obesity in female adolescents. Mediators Inflamm 2019:1–11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 59.Cho KY (2021) Lifestyle modifications result in alterations in the gut microbiota in obese children. BMC Microbiol 21(1):10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Baek C, Kim WJ, Moon J, Moon SY, Kim W, Hu HJ et al (2022) Differences in the gut Microbiome composition of Korean children and adult samples based on different DNA isolation kits. PLoS ONE 17(3):e0264291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Iqbal M, Yu Q, Tang J, Xiang J (2025) Unraveling the gut microbiota’s role in obesity: key metabolites, microbial species, and therapeutic insights. J Bacteriol 207(5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 62.Zhang S, Dang Y (2022) Roles of gut microbiota and metabolites in overweight and obesity of children. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 63.Larraufie P, Martin-Gallausiaux C, Lapaque N, Dore J, Gribble FM, Reimann F et al (2018) SCFAs strongly stimulate PYY production in human enteroendocrine cells. Sci Rep 8(1):74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Murugesan S, Nirmalkar K, Hoyo-Vadillo C, García-Espitia M, Ramírez-Sánchez D, García-Mena J (2018) Gut microbiome production of short-chain fatty acids and obesity in children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37(4):621–625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sindi AS (2025) The association between maternal diet and the human milk microbiome: A review of evidence and methodological challenges. Microorganisms 13(10):2347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Prentice PM, Schoemaker MH, Vervoort J, Hettinga K, Lambers TT, van Tol EAF et al (2019) Human milk short-chain fatty acid composition is associated with adiposity outcomes in infants. J Nutr 149(5):716–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Xi M, Yan Y, Duan S, Li T, Szeto IMY, Zhao A (2024) Short-chain fatty acids in breast milk and their relationship with the infant gut microbiota. Front Microbiol 15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68.Łoniewski I, Skonieczna-Żydecka K, Stachowska L, Fraszczyk-Tousty M, Tousty P, Łoniewska B (2022) Breastfeeding affects concentration of faecal short chain fatty acids during the first year of life: results of the systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Front Nutr 9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 69.Hsu CY, Khachatryan LG, Younis NK, Mustafa MA, Ahmad N, Athab ZH et al (2024) Microbiota-derived short chain fatty acids in pediatric health and diseases: from gut development to neuroprotection. Front Microbiol 15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 70.Li S, Ma X, Mei H, Chang X, He P, Sun L et al (2025) Association between gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in children with obesity. Sci Rep 15(1):483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Śliżewska K, Włodarczyk M, Sobczak M, Barczyńska R, Kapuśniak J, Socha P et al (2023) Comparison of the activity of fecal enzymes and concentration of SCFA in healthy and overweight children. Nutrients 15(4):987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gyarmati P, Song Y, Dotimas J, Yoshiba G, Christison A (2021) Cross-sectional comparisons of gut Microbiome and short‐chain fatty acid levels among children with varied weight classifications. Pediatr Obes 16(6) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 73.Wei Y, Liang J, Su Y, Wang J, Amakye WK, Pan J et al (2021) The associations of the gut microbiome composition and short-chain fatty acid concentrations with body fat distribution in children. Clin Nutr 40(5):3379–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Faradilah A, Bukhari A, Aminuddin A, Syauki AY (2025) The role of obesity in altering the effects of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) on metabolic hormone regulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr Open Sci 60:181–199 [Google Scholar]
- 75.David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE et al (2014) Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut Microbiome. Nature 505(7484):559–563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Moszak M, Szulińska M, Bogdański P (2020) You are what you Eat—The relationship between Diet, Microbiota, and metabolic Disorders—A review. Nutrients 12(4):1096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Di Profio E, Magenes VC, Fiore G, Agostinelli M, La Mendola A, Acunzo M et al (2022) Special diets in infants and children and impact on gut microbioma. Nutrients 14(15):3198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ho NT, Li F, Lee-Sarwar KA, Tun HM, Brown BP, Pannaraj PS et al (2018) Meta-analysis of effects of exclusive breastfeeding on infant gut microbiota across populations. Nat Commun 9(1):4169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hegar B, Wibowo Y, Basrowi RW, Ranuh RG, Sudarmo SM, Munasir Z et al (2019) The role of two human milk oligosaccharides, 2′-Fucosyllactose and Lacto-N-Neotetraose, in infant nutrition. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 22(4):330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Catassi G, Aloi M, Giorgio V, Gasbarrini A, Cammarota G, Ianiro G (2024) The role of diet and nutritional interventions for the infant gut microbiome. Nutrients 16(3):400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Laursen MF, Andersen LBB, Michaelsen KF, Mølgaard C, Trolle E, Bahl MI et al (2016) Infant gut microbiota development is driven by transition to family foods independent of maternal obesity. mSphere 1(1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 82.Differding MK, Benjamin-Neelon SE, Hoyo C, Østbye T, Mueller NT (2020) Timing of complementary feeding is associated with gut microbiota diversity and composition and short chain fatty acid concentrations over the first year of life. BMC Microbiol 20(1):56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Neri-Numa IA, Pastore GM (2020) Novel insights into prebiotic properties on human health: a review. Food Res Int 131:108973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Simpson HL, Campbell BJ (2015) Review article: dietary fibre-microbiota interactions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 42(2):158–179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wu S, Bhat ZF, Gounder RS, Mohamed Ahmed IA, Al-Juhaimi FY, Ding Y et al (2022) Effect of dietary protein and processing on gut Microbiota—A. Syst Rev Nutrients 14(3):453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Caffarelli C, Di Mauro D, Mastrorilli C, Bottau P, Cipriani F, Ricci G (2018) Solid food introduction and the development of food allergies. Nutrients 10(11):1790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Bäckhed F, Roswall J, Peng Y, Feng Q, Jia H, Kovatcheva-Datchary P et al (2015) Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe 17(5):690–703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Fewtrell M, Bronsky J, Campoy C, Domellöf M, Embleton N, Fidler Mis N et al (2017) Complement Feeding J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 64(1):119–132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Davis C, Bryan J, Hodgson J, Murphy K (2015) Definition of the mediterranean diet; a literature review. Nutrients 7(11):9139–9153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Preston M, Clayton AK (2023) P. Macronutrient adequacy of a Mediterranean-type meal examined at recommended and below recommended energy values. J Food Sci Nutr Res 06(02) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 91.Fundación Dieta Mediterránea Decálogo. [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 13]. Available from: https://dietamediterranea.com/nutricion-saludable-ejercicio-fisico/
- 92.Rejeski JJ, Wilson FM, Nagpal R, Yadav H, Weinberg RB (2022) The impact of a mediterranean diet on the gut microbiome in healthy human subjects: a pilot study. Digestion 103(2):133–140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Merra G, Noce A, Marrone G, Cintoni M, Tarsitano MG, Capacci A et al (2020) Influence of mediterranean diet on human gut microbiota. Nutrients 13(1):7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Nagpal R, Shively CA, Register TC, Craft S, Yadav H (2019) Gut microbiome-Mediterranean diet interactions in improving host health. F1000Res 8:699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Krznarić Ž, Vranešić Bender D, Meštrović T (2019) The mediterranean diet and its association with selected gut bacteria. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 22(5):401–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Garcia-Mantrana I, Selma-Royo M, Alcantara C, Collado MC (2018) Shifts on gut microbiota associated to mediterranean diet adherence and specific dietary intakes on general adult population. Front Microbiol 9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 97.Abrignani V, Salvo A, Pacinella G, Tuttolomondo A (2024) The mediterranean diet, its microbiome connections, and cardiovascular health: a narrative review. Int J Mol Sci 25(9):4942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kashtanova DA, Popenko AS, Tkacheva ON, Tyakht AB, Alexeev DG, Boytsov SA (2016) Association between the gut microbiota and diet: fetal life, early childhood, and further life. Nutrition 32(6):620–627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Pagliai G, Russo E, Niccolai E, Dinu M, Di Pilato V, Magrini A et al (2020) Influence of a 3-month low-calorie mediterranean diet compared to the vegetarian diet on human gut microbiota and SCFA: the CARDIVEG study. Eur J Nutr 59(5):2011–2024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Shankar V, Gouda M, Moncivaiz J, Gordon A, Reo NV, Hussein L et al (2017) Differences in gut metabolites and microbial composition and functions between Egyptian and U.S. Children are consistent with their diets. mSystems 2(1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 101.García-Montero C, Fraile-Martínez O, Gómez-Lahoz AM, Pekarek L, Castellanos AJ, Noguerales-Fraguas F et al (2021) Nutritional components in Western diet versus mediterranean diet at the gut Microbiota–Immune system Interplay. Implications for health and disease. Nutrients 13(2):699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Han Y, Teng TM, Han J, Kim HS (2025) Antibiotic-associated changes in Akkermansia muciniphila alter its effects on host metabolic health. Microbiome 13(1):48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Li R, Kurilshikov A, Yang S, van Oortmerssen JAE, van Hilten A, Ahmadizar F et al (2025) Association between gut microbiome profiles and host metabolic health across the life course: a population-based study. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe 50:101195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Redecilla Ferreiro S, Moráis López A, Moreno Villares JM, Redecilla Ferreiro S, Moráis López A, Moreno Villares JM et al (2020) Recomendaciones del Comité de Nutrición y Lactancia Materna de la Asociación Española de Pediatría sobre las dietas vegetarianas. An Pediatr (Engl Ed) 92(5):306.e1-306.e6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Hargreaves SM, Rosenfeld DL, Moreira AVB, Zandonadi RP (2023) Plant-based and vegetarian diets: an overview and definition of these dietary patterns. Eur J Nutr 62(3):1109–1121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Niklewicz A, Smith AD, Smith A, Holzer A, Klein A, McCaddon A et al (2023) The importance of vitamin B12 for individuals choosing plant-based diets. Eur J Nutr 62(3):1551–1559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Poullet JB, Massart S et al (2010) Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(33):14691–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Mazhar M, Zhu Y, Qin L (2023) The interplay of dietary fibers and intestinal microbiota affects type 2 diabetes by generating short-chain fatty acids. Foods 12(5):1023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Myhrstad MCW, Tunsjø H, Charnock C, Telle-Hansen VH (2020) Dietary fiber, gut microbiota, and metabolic regulation—current status in human randomized trials. Nutrients 12(3):859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Mo C, Lou X, Xue J, Shi Z, Zhao Y, Wang F et al (2024) The influence of Akkermansia muciniphila on intestinal barrier function. Gut Pathog 16(1):41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Martinez RM, Hulten KG, Bui U, Clarridge JE (2014) Molecular analysis and clinical significance of Lactobacillus spp. recovered from clinical specimens presumptively associated with disease. J Clin Microbiol 52(1):30–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Gavzy SJ, Kensiski A, Lee ZL, Mongodin EF, Ma B, Bromberg JS (2023) Bifidobacterium mechanisms of immune modulation and tolerance. Gut Microbes 15(2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 113.Wang L, Yi Q, Xu H, Liu H, Tan B, Deng H et al (2024) Alterations in the gut microbiota community are associated with childhood obesity and precocious puberty. BMC Microbiol 24(1):311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Glick-Bauer M, Yeh MC (2014) The health advantage of a vegan diet: exploring the gut microbiota connection. Nutrients 6(11):4822–4838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Matijašić BB, Obermajer T, Lipoglavšek L, Grabnar I, Avguštin G, Rogelj I (2014) Association of dietary type with fecal microbiota in vegetarians and omnivores in Slovenia. Eur J Nutr 53(4):1051–1064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Betancur-Murillo CL, Aguilar-Marín SB, Jovel J (2022) Prevotella: a key player in ruminal metabolism. Microorganisms 11(1):1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Ramos Meyers G, Samouda H, Bohn T (2022) Short chain fatty acid metabolism in relation to gut microbiota and genetic variability. Nutrients 14(24):5361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Al Bander Z, Nitert MD, Mousa A, Naderpoor N (2020) The gut microbiota and inflammation: an overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(20):7618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Jarman JB, Torres PJ, Stromberg S, Sato H, Stack C, Ladrillono A et al (2025) Bifidobacterium deficit in united States infants drives prevalent gut dysbiosis. Commun Biol 8(1):867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Barrett H, Gomez-Arango L, Wilkinson S, McIntyre H, Callaway L, Morrison M et al (2018) A vegetarian diet is a major determinant of gut microbiota composition in early pregnancy. Nutrients 10(7):890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.McMath AL, Aguilar-Lopez M, Cannavale CN, Khan NA, Donovan SM (2023) A systematic review on the impact of Gastrointestinal microbiota composition and function on cognition in healthy infants and children. Front Neurosci 17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 122.Astbury S, Atallah E, Vijay A, Aithal GP, Grove JI, Valdes AM (2020) Lower gut Microbiome diversity and higher abundance of Proinflammatory genus Collinsella are associated with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gut Microbes 11(3):569–580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Tomova A, Bukovsky I, Rembert E, Yonas W, Alwarith J, Barnard ND et al (2019) The effects of vegetarian and vegan diets on gut microbiota. Front Nutr 6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 124.Clemente-Suárez VJ, Beltrán-Velasco AI, Redondo-Flórez L, Martín-Rodríguez A, Tornero-Aguilera JF (2023) Global impacts of Western diet and its effects on metabolism and health: a narrative review. Nutrients 15(12):2749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Velázquez KT, Enos RT, Bader JE, Sougiannis AT, Carson MS, Chatzistamou I et al (2019) Prolonged high-fat-diet feeding promotes non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and alters gut microbiota in mice. World J Hepatol 11(8):619–637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Ramne S, Brunkwall L, Ericson U, Gray N, Kuhnle GGC, Nilsson PM et al (2021) Gut microbiota composition in relation to intake of added sugar, sugar-sweetened beverages and artificially sweetened beverages in the Malmö offspring study. Eur J Nutr 60(4):2087–2097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Schiffman SS, Nagle HT (2019) Revisited: assessing the in vivo data on low/no-calorie sweeteners and the gut microbiota. Food Chem Toxicol 132:110692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Kim CH (2023) Complex regulatory effects of gut microbial short-chain fatty acids on immune tolerance and autoimmunity. Cell Mol Immunol 20(4):341–350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Severino A, Tohumcu E, Tamai L, Dargenio P, Porcari S, Rondinella D et al (2024) The microbiome-driven impact of western diet in the development of noncommunicable chronic disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Nakayama J, Yamamoto A, Palermo-Conde LA, Higashi K, Sonomoto K, Tan J et al (2017) Impact of Westernized diet on gut microbiota in children on Leyte Island. Front Microbiol 8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 131.Li XM, Lv Q, Chen YJ, Yan LB, Xiong X (2024) Association between childhood obesity and gut microbiota: 16S rRNA gene sequencing-based cohort study. World J Gastroenterol 30(16):2249–2257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Du W, Liu L, Ma Y, Zhu Q, Jia R, Han Y et al (2022) Analysis of the gut microbiome in obese native Tibetan children living at different altitudes: a case-control study. Front Public Health 10:963202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.De Filippo C, Di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Albanese D, Pieraccini G, Banci E et al (2017) Diet, Environments, and gut Microbiota. A preliminary investigation in children living in rural and urban Burkina Faso and Italy. Front Microbiol 8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 134.Iddrisu I, Monteagudo-Mera A, Poveda C, Pyle S, Shahzad M, Andrews S et al (2021) Malnutrition and gut microbiota in children. Nutrients 13(8):2727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Chibuye M, Mende DR, Spijker R, Simuyandi M, Luchen CC, Bosomprah S et al (2024) Systematic review of associations between gut Microbiome composition and stunting in under-five children. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 10(1):46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Herman DR, Rhoades N, Mercado J, Argueta P, Lopez U, Flores GE (2020) Dietary habits of 2- to 9-year-old American children are associated with gut microbiome composition. J Acad Nutr Diet 120(4):517–534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.



