Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1990 Feb;57(2):209–221. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82524-8

New insights into the behavior of muscle during active lengthening.

D L Morgan 1
PMCID: PMC1280663  PMID: 2317547

Abstract

A muscle fiber was modeled as a series-connected string of sarcomeres, using an A. V. Hill type model for each sarcomere and allowing for some random variation in the properties of the sarcomeres. Applying stretches to this model led to the prediction that lengthening of active muscle on or beyond the plateau of the length tension curve will take place very nonuniformly, essentially by rapid, uncontrolled elongation of individual sarcomeres, one at a time, in order from the weakest toward the strongest. Such a "popped" sarcomere, at least in a single fiber, will be stretched to a length where there is no overlap between thick and thin filaments, and the tension is borne by passive components. This prediction allows modeling of many results that have previously been inexplicable, notably the permanent extra tension after stretch on the descending limb of the length tension curve, and the continued rise of tension during a continued stretch.

Full text

PDF
209

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altringham J. D., Bottinelli R. The descending limb of the sarcomere length-force relation in single muscle fibres of the frog. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1985 Oct;6(5):585–600. doi: 10.1007/BF00711916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong R. B., Ogilvie R. W., Schwane J. A. Eccentric exercise-induced injury to rat skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Jan;54(1):80–93. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.1.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bottinelli R., Eastwood J. C., Flitney F. W. Sarcomere 'give' during stretch of frog single muscle fibres with added series compliance. Q J Exp Physiol. 1989 Mar;74(2):215–217. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1989.sp003258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavagna G. A., Dusman B., Margaria R. Positive work done by a previously stretched muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1968 Jan;24(1):21–32. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1968.24.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarkson P. M., Tremblay I. Exercise-induced muscle damage, repair, and adaptation in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1988 Jul;65(1):1–6. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.65.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Colomo F., Lombardi V., Piazzesi G. The mechanisms of force enhancement during constant velocity lengthening in tetanized single fibres of frog muscle. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1988;226:489–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edman K. A., Elzinga G., Noble M. I. Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractions of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:139–155. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edman K. A., Elzinga G., Noble M. I. Residual force enhancement after stretch of contracting frog single muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Nov;80(5):769–784. doi: 10.1085/jgp.80.5.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Edman K. A., Reggiani C. Redistribution of sarcomere length during isometric contraction of frog muscle fibres and its relation to tension creep. J Physiol. 1984 Jun;351:169–198. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Flitney F. W., Hirst D. G. Cross-bridge detachment and sarcomere 'give' during stretch of active frog's muscle. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:449–465. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fridén J., Sjöström M., Ekblom B. Myofibrillar damage following intense eccentric exercise in man. Int J Sports Med. 1983 Aug;4(3):170–176. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldspink G. Malleability of the motor system: a comparative approach. J Exp Biol. 1985 Mar;115:375–391. doi: 10.1242/jeb.115.1.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. HUXLEY A. F., PEACHEY L. D. The maximum length for contraction in vertebrate straiated muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Apr;156:150–165. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Harry J. D., Ward A. W., Heglund N. C., Morgan D. L., McMahon T. A. Cross-bridge cycling theories cannot explain high-speed lengthening behavior in frog muscle. Biophys J. 1990 Feb;57(2):201–208. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82523-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huxley A. F. The activation of striated muscle and its mechanical response. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1971 Jun 15;178(1050):1–27. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1971.0049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Julian F. J., Morgan D. L. Intersarcomere dynamics during fixed-end tetanic contractions of frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1979 Aug;293:365–378. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Julian F. J., Morgan D. L. The effect on tension of non-uniform distribution of length changes applied to frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1979 Aug;293:379–392. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Katz B. The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction. J Physiol. 1939 Jun 14;96(1):45–64. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McCully K. K., Faulkner J. A. Injury to skeletal muscle fibers of mice following lengthening contractions. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1985 Jul;59(1):119–126. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1985.59.1.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Morgan D. L., Mochon S., Julian F. J. A quantitative model of intersarcomere dynamics during fixed-end contractions of single frog muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1982 Aug;39(2):189–196. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84507-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Newham D. J., McPhail G., Mills K. R., Edwards R. H. Ultrastructural changes after concentric and eccentric contractions of human muscle. J Neurol Sci. 1983 Sep;61(1):109–122. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(83)90058-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schwane J. A., Armstrong R. B. Effect of training on skeletal muscle injury from downhill running in rats. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Sep;55(3):969–975. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.55.3.969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tsuchiya T., Sugi H. Muscle stiffness changes during enhancement and deficit of isometric force in response to slow length changes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1988;226:503–511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES