Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1979 Aug;293:379–392. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012895

The effect on tension of non-uniform distribution of length changes applied to frog muscle fibres.

F J Julian, D L Morgan
PMCID: PMC1280719  PMID: 315465

Abstract

1. The stability of sarcomere lengths along single frog twitch fibres was examined, during lengthening and shortening, using a spot follower appparatus to monitor or control the length of a central segment. 2. During active shortening from sarcomere lengths beyond 2.2 micrometer the end sarcomeres shortened dramatically, while much of the fibre did not shorten at all. It is proposed that this is the cause of the tension failing to recover, after the shortening ceased, to the value of isometric tension at the shorter length. 3. During active lenghtening from sarcomere lengths beyond 2.2 micrometer, non-uniformity of stretch was seen, with the middle stretching more than the ends. Some maintained extra tension after stretch above that appropriate to the longer length was found, as were consistent changes in internal movement, and in the shape of the tension record during relaxation. 4. Measurements of stiffness during and after a lengthening suggest that no increased activation is involved. Observation of internal movement during the raised tension after a lengthening contradicts theories involving 'locked on' bridges. 5. From these and other observations, an explanation for the extra tension in terms of non-uniformity of sarcomeres is proposed. The explanation is in accord with that previously suggested for the creep phase of tension rise seen at these lengths.

Full text

PDF
379

Images in this article

392-1Plate 1
on p.392-1

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABBOTT B. C., AUBERT X. M. The force exerted by active striated muscle during and after change of length. J Physiol. 1952 May;117(1):77–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edman K. A., Elzinga G., Noble M. I. Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractions of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:139–155. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edman K. A., Elzinga G., Noble M. I. Further characterization of the enhancement of force by stretch during activity in single muscle fibres of the frog [proceedings]. J Physiol. 1978 Jul;280:35P–36P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edman K. A., Elzinga G., Noble M. I. Proceedings: Force enhancement induced by stretch of contracting single isolated muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1976 Jun;258(2):95P–96P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Flitney F. W., Hirst D. G. Cross-bridge detachment and sarcomere 'give' during stretch of active frog's muscle. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:449–465. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. Tension development in highly stretched vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):143–169. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HILL A. V. The mechanics of active muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1953 Mar 11;141(902):104–117. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1953.0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUXLEY A. F. MUSCLE. Annu Rev Physiol. 1964;26:131–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.26.030164.001023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HUXLEY A. F., PEACHEY L. D. The maximum length for contraction in vertebrate straiated muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Apr;156:150–165. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUXLEY H. E. X-ray analysis and the problem of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1953 Mar 11;141(902):59–62. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1953.0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill L. A-band length, striation spacing and tension change on stretch of active muscle. J Physiol. 1977 Apr;266(3):677–685. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Julian F. J., Morgan D. L. Intersarcomere dynamics during fixed-end tetanic contractions of frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1979 Aug;293:365–378. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Julian F. J., Sollins M. R., Moss R. L. Sarcomere length non-uniformity in relation to tetanic responses of stretched skeletal muscle fibres. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978 Jan 24;200(1138):109–116. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1978.0009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peachey L. D., Eisenberg B. R. Helicoids in the T system and striations of frog skeletal muscle fibers seen by high voltage electron microscopy. Biophys J. 1978 May;22(2):145–154. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85480-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pringle J. W. The Croonian Lecture, 1977. Stretch activation of muscle: function and mechanism. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978 May 5;201(1143):107–130. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1978.0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES