Skip to main content
Aging Cell logoLink to Aging Cell
. 2026 Jan 16;25(2):e70385. doi: 10.1111/acel.70385

Aging of the Hematopoietic System: Mechanisms, Consequences, and Systemic Interactions

Masashi Miyawaki 1, Seiji Hashimoto 1, Sumito Ogawa 1,, Yoshitaka Kase 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12809054  PMID: 41540894

ABSTRACT

The aging of the hematopoietic system is central to physiological aging, with profound consequences for immune competence, tissue regeneration, and systemic health. Age‐related changes manifest as altered blood cell composition, functional decline in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), and deterioration of the bone marrow niche. Beyond hematologic dysfunction, hematopoietic aging acts as a systemic amplifier of age‐related diseases through clonal hematopoiesis and inflammatory remodeling. This review integrates recent insights into the mechanisms and systemic impacts of hematopoietic aging, reframing it as a modifiable axis of systemic aging. We highlight emerging rejuvenation strategies—senolytics, metabolic reprogramming, and microbiota‐targeted therapies—that aim to restore hematopoietic and immune function, offering promising avenues to improve healthspan and reduce age‐related multimorbidity.

Keywords: aging, healthspan, hematopoiesis, hematopoietic stem cells, inflammation


Hematopoietic aging arises from intrinsic stem‐cell decline and bone‐marrow niche dysfunction, leading to myeloid skewing, immunosenescence, and clonal hematopoiesis. These changes drive systemic inflammation and multi‐organ disease, which in turn further disrupt the bone‐marrow niche and hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) function, creating a vicious cycle that accelerates organismal aging.

graphic file with name ACEL-25-e70385-g001.jpg

1. Introduction

Hematopoiesis is a lifelong process in which the body maintains the production of blood and immune cells from a reservoir of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) (Pinho and Frenette 2019). This dynamic system maintains homeostasis and ensures immune surveillance, tissue repair, and oxygen transport throughout life. However, aging imposes significant challenges on the hematopoietic system, resulting in functional impairments and increased susceptibility to illness.

The aging hematopoietic system is characterized by several hallmark features: myeloid‐biased differentiation, reduced lymphopoiesis, diminished regenerative capacity, and increased incidence of clonal hematopoiesis (Pang et al. 2011; De Haan and Lazare 2018; Jaiswal et al. 2014; Evans and Walsh 2023). These changes result from a complex interplay of intrinsic HSC alterations—including DNA damage, epigenetic drift, and metabolic dysfunction—and extrinsic factors, such as niche aging and systemic inflammation. While systemic inflammation is often regarded as a hallmark of aging (“inflammaging”), recent evidence suggests that its extent may be amplified by industrialized lifestyles rather than being an inevitable consequence of aging itself (Franck et al. 2025). This perspective underscores that some extrinsic drivers of hematopoietic aging may be environmentally modifiable.

Clinically, hematopoietic aging contributes to immunosenescence, increased vulnerability to infections, poor responses to vaccines, and a higher risk of hematologic malignancies (Liu et al. 2023). Notably, the discovery of clonal hematopoiesis with indeterminate potential (CHIP) has established direct links between aging hematopoietic clones and systemic diseases, particularly cardiovascular disease (Jaiswal et al. 2017; Evans and Walsh 2023). These findings highlight that hematopoietic aging is not confined to the hematologic domain but exerts widespread effects on organismal health.

This review comprehensively compiles the available data about the molecular mechanisms driving hematopoietic aging and reframes the aging hematopoietic system as a modifiable axis of organismal aging. We highlight emerging evidence that hematopoietic aging reflects and amplifies systemic pathology through chronic inflammation, clonal expansion, and inter‐organ communication. Furthermore, we discuss promising rejuvenation strategies—including senolytics, metabolic reprogramming, and microbiota‐targeted therapies—that aim to restore hematopoietic and immune function, offering novel avenues to extend healthspan and counteract age‐related multimorbidity.

2. Age‐Related Changes in the Peripheral Blood of the Elderly

2.1. Myeloid Skewing

In elderly humans, peripheral blood often shows relative myeloid predominance and reduced lymphocyte counts (Pang et al. 2011; Pellegrino et al. 2024).

Recent lineage‐tracing studies of aged mice showed that HSC‐derived differentiation declines across all lineages with only partial compensation in the myeloid compartment (Säwen et al. 2018; Jang et al. 2023; Konturek‐Ciesla et al. 2023). Consistently, in situ barcoding of physiologically aged mice demonstrated that the increased abundance of myeloid cells during aging results from a higher number of HSPC clones contributing to myelopoiesis, rather than enhanced myeloid output per clone, refining the interpretation of “myeloid bias” from intrinsic lineage skewing to a clonal compensation mechanism (Urbanus et al. 2023).

Consistently in humans, recent single‐cell analyses of healthy bone marrow revealed that myeloid shift is not driven by an expansion of myeloid progenitors but rather by a decline in overall differentiation activity and a disproportionate loss of lymphoid potential (Komic et al. 2025). Finally, high‐resolution clonal tracking across both mice and humans has demonstrated that clonal expansions—rather than uniform lineage shifts—account for much of the apparent myeloid bias (Scherer et al. 2025). Together, these findings redefine age‐associated myeloid skewing as an emergent property of impaired differentiation and clonal imbalance, rather than a simple shift in lineage priming.

Alterations in HSPC composition and clonal architecture during aging may also underlie the dysregulated megakaryopoiesis and platelet function that accompany myeloid skewing (Reusswig et al. 2024). Single‐cell transcriptomic analyses in mice have shown that aging increases the proportion of HSCs committing to the megakaryocyte–erythroid differentiation trajectory (Hérault et al. 2021). Interestingly, studies in mice have shown that aged HSCs can exhibit a direct differentiation pathway toward megakaryocyte progenitors, bypassing canonical progenitor stages (Poscablo et al. 2024). Extending this paradigm, a recent study identified a rare population of HSC‐derived noncanonical megakaryocyte progenitors that expands with age and exhibits enhanced platelet‐generating capacity, directly linking HSC heterogeneity to age‐related thrombopoiesis (Manso et al. 2025). Complementing these mouse studies, recent single‐cell and in vivo barcoding analyses in humans have demonstrated that platelet‐biased HSCs increase in frequency and transcriptional priming with age, directly linking HSC heterogeneity to age‐associated thrombopoiesis in the human hematopoietic system (Aksöz et al. 2024). At the clinical level, aging is associated with changes in platelet reactivity, turnover, and activation profiles, potentially fostering a pro‐thrombotic, pro‐inflammatory state (Martin et al. 2006; White 2003).

2.2. Immunosenescence and Its Manifestations

In humans, immunosenescence denotes a progressive reduction in adaptive immune competence with age. Thymic involution reduces naive T‐cell output, resulting in diminished T‐cell receptor (TCR) diversity (Nikolich‐Žugich 2018; Liu et al. 2023). The peripheral T cells shift toward memory and senescent phenotypes, particularly CD8+ T cells, which accumulate DNA damage and exhibit impaired function. B‐cell output and diversity decline with reduced class‐switch recombination and somatic hypermutation. Consequently, elderly individuals experience poor responses to vaccination, increased infection susceptibility, and elevated cancer risk.

A specific subset of T cells termed senescence‐associated T (SA‐T) cells has also been implicated as a key contributor to chronic inflammation and age‐associated diseases (Shimatani et al. 2009; Fukushima et al. 2018). SA‐T cells were first described in mice and are characterized by the loss of co‐stimulatory molecules like CD28, high expression of inhibitory receptors, and release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as osteopontin (Tahir et al. 2015). With advancing age, these cells accumulate and reside in inflamed tissues, promoting the inflammaging phenotype. Consistent with this, in humans, expansions of highly differentiated/senescent T cell subsets are associated with metabolic and autoimmune pathology (Robertson and Hansson 2006; Lee et al. 2019; Lu et al. 2023). Their pro‐inflammatory activity exacerbates tissue damage, sustains chronic inflammation, and represents a potential therapeutic target for mitigating immunosenescence‐related pathology and improving immune resilience in aging populations.

Moreover, in mice, recent studies have suggested that bacteria‐induced B cell senescence contributes to immune decline with age. Persistent stimulation by commensal gut bacteria such as Bacteroides acidifaciens induces senescence in germinal center (GC) B cells, particularly in Peyer's patches and isolated lymphoid follicles (Kawamoto et al. 2023). This leads to reduced production and diversity of IgA, impairing mucosal immunity and altering the gut microbiota composition, thereby creating a feedback loop of inflammation and immune dysregulation.

Supercentenarians, individuals aged 110 years or older, provide further unique insights into successful hematopoietic aging (Hashimoto et al. 2019). Despite their extreme age, supercentenarians exhibit remarkable immune competence. Studies have shown expanded cytotoxic CD4+ T‐cell populations and reduced clonal hematopoiesis compared to younger individuals (Hashimoto et al. 2019).

Beyond the adaptive arm, innate compartments also age. In mice, p16+ senescent cells including alveolar macrophages upregulate PD‐L1, enabling immune evasion and sustaining inflammation (Majewska et al. 2024). In mice and humans, senescent cells broadly upregulate the ganglioside GD3, which suppresses NK cell–mediated clearance via Siglec interactions; blockade of GD3 restores NK cytotoxicity and mitigates age‐related tissue fibrosis in vivo (Iltis et al. 2025).

These age‐associated changes in peripheral blood reflect the broader remodeling of the hematopoietic system and establish the foundation for understanding downstream impacts on immunity, disease risk, and potential rejuvenation strategies.

3. Intrinsic Aging of Hematopoietic Stem Cells

3.1. Impaired Self‐Renewal, Repopulating Capacity, and Differentiation Bias in Aging HSCs

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) exhibit progressive functional decline with age and are marked by reduced self‐renewal, diminished engraftment potential, and lineage skewing. Although the count of phenotypically defined HSCs increases with age, their quality and regenerative capacity deteriorate (De Haan and Lazare 2018; Sudo et al. 2000; Ogawa et al. 2000; Beerman et al. 2010). Aged HSCs exhibit reduced capacity to remain in a quiescent, non‐cycling state, leading to exhaustion and hematopoietic dysfunction, which is supported by the fact that increasing donor age is associated with worse outcome in HSC transplantation (Pruitt et al. 2023).

An integrative meta‐analysis of murine HSC transcriptomes defined an aging signature enriched for membrane molecules such as P‐selectin and skewed toward gene upregulation, consistent with a transcriptionally activated state in aged HSCs supported by increased RNA polymeraseII activity and chromatin accessibility (Flohr Svendsen et al. 2021).

Transcriptomic analyses in both mice and humans demonstrate age‐associated reduction in lymphoid gene programs and increased myeloid output, consistent with functional skewing (Beerman et al. 2010; Kowalczyk et al. 2015). However, accumulating evidence suggests that these alterations do not simply reflect a binary deregulation of lymphoid versus myeloid differentiation programs at the transcriptional level. Instead, single‐cell analyses of murine HSC indicate that aging is prominently associated with defects in cell cycle regulation, including altered G1 phase dynamics and proliferation‐driven functional decline, which secondarily influence lineage output (Kowalczyk et al. 2015; Kirschner et al. 2017). Notably, recent analyses of human HSCs demonstrate a progressive, intrinsic impairment in mitogenic responsiveness and cell cycle entry with advancing age, characterized by delayed G1 progression and reduced AKT signaling, providing direct evidence that dysregulated cell cycle control is a conserved hallmark of intrinsic HSC aging across species (Hammond et al. 2023). Florian et al. further showed that disruption of HSC polarity through Cdc42 dysregulation impairs self‐renewal, highlighting cytoskeletal changes as a causal mechanism (Florian et al. 2018). More recently, Su et al. identified CD49b‐defined subsets with differential vulnerability to aging: myeloid‐biased CD49b HSCs expand and dominate with age, while lymphoid‐biased CD49b+ HSCs decline (Su et al. 2024). Notably, CD49b HSCs retain relatively preserved self‐renewal capacity even in aged mice, yet their differentiation output remains predominantly myeloid‐biased, indicating that preservation of stemness does not equate to maintenance of balanced lineage potential. Together, these findings from murine and human studies indicate that intrinsic functional decline and shifts in HSC subset composition converge to impair hematopoiesis with aging.

3.2. DNA Damage Accumulation and Genomic Instability

One major driver of intrinsic HSC aging is the accumulation of DNA damage from replication stress, oxidative injury, and declining repair capacity. In mice, aged or DNA‐repair–deficient HSCs accumulate damage and lose function, and a p53‐dependent differentiation checkpoint limits self‐renewal after genotoxic stress (Rossi et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2012). Replication stress has been shown to be a potent cause of functional decline in murine aging HSCs (Flach et al. 2014).

Mitochondrial ROS and impaired quality control further exacerbate genomic instability. Mouse studies demonstrate that FOXO3A‐driven autophagy protects HSCs from stress, and its disruption compromises HSC maintenance (Bratic and Larsson 2013; Warr et al. 2013).

In humans, accumulation of DNA damage with age is detectable in CD34+ HSPCs (γH2AX foci) from older individuals (Rübe et al. 2011). Moreover, human HSCs subjected to repeated proliferation (serial transplantation/xenotransplant settings) develop progressive ROS‐mediated oxidative DNA damage with activation of ATM–CHK2–FOXO3a pathways, leading to cell‐cycle arrest and senescence‐like changes; antioxidant treatment with N‐acetylcysteine mitigated this damage and preserved function (Yahata et al. 2011).

3.3. Clonal Hematopoiesis: Somatic Mutation and Chromosomal Mosaicism

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) arises from somatic mutations in genes such as DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1, which confer a competitive advantage to mutant HSC clones. CHIP prevalence rises with advancing age and correlates with elevated risks of hematologic malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and overall mortality (Jaiswal et al. 2017; Evans and Walsh 2023). Large cohort studies have demonstrated that CHIP is detectable in over 10%–20% of individuals over 70 years (Jaiswal et al. 2014; Young et al. 2016; Watson et al. 2020).

CHIP exemplifies how age‐related intrinsic changes in HSCs contribute to systemic pathologies. Recent studies have suggested that CHIP‐associated mutations alter immune cell function, driving chronic inflammation and age‐related disease, as will be examined more fully in a dedicated section below.

In addition to single nucleotide mutations, chromosomal abnormalities contribute significantly to clonal hematopoiesis. Mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs), including copy number gains, losses, and loss of heterozygosity, as well as mosaic loss of the Y chromosome (mLOY), are key components of somatic mosaicism in hematopoietic cells. These abnormalities increase in prevalence with age and represent an alternative driver of clonal expansion distinct from classical gene mutations (Forsberg et al. 2014; Bruhn‐Olszewska et al. 2025). By the age of 70, up to 40% of men may exhibit mLOY in their hematopoietic cells. Importantly, individuals with mCAs exhibit greater susceptibility to hematologic malignancies and cardiovascular events, similar to CHIP (Forsberg et al. 2014; Bruhn‐Olszewska et al. 2025; Thompson et al. 2019; Sano and Walsh 2025). mLOY, in particular, is considered the most frequent somatic mosaicism observed in blood cells and serves as a biomarker for genomic instability and age‐related disease.

Recent high‐resolution genomic analyses have further advanced our understanding of age‐related clonal hematopoiesis. A pivotal study utilizing whole‐genome sequencing of over 3500 single‐cell–derived hematopoietic colonies revealed that although hematopoiesis remains polyclonal up to around 65 years of age, a marked reduction in clonal diversity occurs thereafter (Mitchell et al. 2022). In individuals > 70 years of age, 30%–60% of hematopoiesis cases were driven by only 12–18 dominant clones. These clones typically began expanding decades earlier, often before age 40, and the majority lacked known driver mutations. This suggests that the accumulation of moderate‐effect mutations under lifelong positive selection gradually primes the hematopoietic system for an abrupt shift toward oligoclonality in late life.

3.4. Epigenetic Drift and Transcriptional Dysregulation

Aging induces widespread epigenetic alterations in HSCs. Genome‐wide DNA‐methylation studies show that aging is accompanied by hypermethylation and repression of lymphoid‐associated genes, whereas a substantial subset of HSC identity‐defining genes–many of which are linked to myeloid‐biased output–exhibit relative hypomethylation with increased expression, consistent with lineage skewing (Beerman and Rossi 2015; Sun et al. 2014). Chromatin remodeling defects, loss of histone modification, and altered non‐coding RNA expression further intensify HSC dysfunction (Sun et al. 2014; Itokawa et al. 2022). In parallel, aged human HSCs undergo extensive epigenetic reprogramming of enhancers and promoters that mirror leukemic transformation.

Notably, the genes most frequently mutated in CHIP—DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1—are epigenetic regulators identified in human population studies (Jaiswal et al. 2014; Young et al. 2016; Watson et al. 2020). Mechanistic work in mice shows that DNMT3A and TET2 cooperate to maintain DNA‐methylation homeostasis; loss‐of‐function perturbs heterochromatin organization and dysregulates immune/retroelement programs, changes that impair HSC function and favor myeloid output (Hong et al. 2023).

Together, cross‐species data support a model in which epigenetic drift within HSCs—amplified by mutations in epigenetic regulators—contributes to age‐associated transcriptional bias and functional decline.

3.5. Metabolic and Stress‐Response Pathway in Aging HSCs

In addition to increased reliance on OXPHOS, recent studies have revealed that aged HSCs acquire complex metabolic adaptations involving mitochondrial pathways. Morganti and Ito reported that aged murine HSCs display increased mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and excessive ROS production, contributing to DNA damage, myeloid skewing, and loss of regenerative capacity (Morganti and Ito 2021) (Figure 1). Mitochondrial quality control mechanisms, including the FOXO3 and SIRT3 pathways, become impaired with age, intensifying oxidative stress and metabolic dysfunction.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Mitochondrial and metabolic reprogramming in aged hematopoietic stem cells. Conceptual model illustrating mitochondrial and metabolic alterations accompanying hematopoietic stem cell aging. Young hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) maintain quiescence and balanced lineage output through tightly regulated oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and autophagy. In contrast, aged HSCs exhibit increased reliance on OXPHOS, elevated ROS, and impaired quality‐control pathways, leading to DNA damage, myeloid‐biased differentiation, reduced quiescence, diminished regenerative capacity, and clonal dominance. Age‐associated inflammation in the bone marrow niche further disrupts glycolytic metabolism in HSCs, while adaptive changes in mitochondrial metabolism can confer a relative fitness advantage to specific mutant HSC clones (e.g., DNMT3A).

Interestingly, Watanuki et al. demonstrated that aged HSCs gain metabolic resilience by upregulating mitochondrial ATP production via SDHAF1 accumulation (Watanuki et al. 2024). This adaptation allows aged HSCs to maintain energy production and survive independently of glycolysis, particularly under physiological low‐cytokine conditions, but may promote clonal dominance and functional decline.

Moreover, Dellorusso et al. found that persistent inflammation within the aged bone marrow niche impairs glycolysis in HSCs through SOCS3‐mediated AKT/FoxO inhibition in murine models (Dellorusso et al. 2024). In response, autophagy is activated as a protective mechanism to preserve HSC quiescence and function. Inducing autophagy transiently through fasting followed by refeeding rejuvenates glycolytic activity and enhances the regenerative capacity of aged HSCs, highlighting autophagy as a potential therapeutic target to reverse age‐related hematopoietic decline.

Interestingly, a new report highlighted that a subpopulation of aged murine HSCs exhibiting elevated mitochondrial mass demonstrates enhanced self‐renewal capacity, suggesting functional heterogeneity within the aged HSC pool (Totani et al. 2025). These mitochondria‐enriched HSCs exhibited elevated OXPHOS activity and ATP production without excessive ROS generation, suggesting potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Their study also identified GPR183 as a marker of high‐functioning aged HSCs, linking mitochondrial dynamics directly to stem cell aging and resilience.

Moreover, recent evidence has revealed DNMT3A‐mutant HSCs exhibit increased mitochondrial metabolism and one‐carbon flux, providing a clonal fitness advantage under inflammatory stress. Hosseini et al. demonstrated that metformin, by targeting mitochondrial complex I, reverses both the metabolic and epigenetic aberrations in these mutant HSCs, suppressing their clonal expansion in a murine model (Hosseini et al. 2025).

4. Aging of the Hematopoietic Niche

4.1. Structural and Functional Alterations in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment

The hematopoietic niche in the bone marrow (BM) undergoes substantial age‐related changes that impair its ability to support HSC function. Histologically, aged BM is characterized by reduced vascular density, increased adipogenesis, and a decline in osteoblastic niche cells (Stucker et al. 2020; Ambrosi et al. 2017; Morrison and Scadden 2014). These structural changes alter oxygen gradients and metabolic stress, promote HSC dysfunction, and contribute to myeloid bias.

Age‐associated reductions in classical niche‐derived factors such as CXCL12, IGF‐1, SCF, and G‐CSF have long been recognized as drivers of impaired HSC maintenance and biased differentiation (Nakatani et al. 2023; Pinho and Zhao 2024). Beyond these well‐established mediators, recent work has identified Netrin‐1 as a novel factor whose loss further weakens vascular integrity and exacerbates adipogenesis and DNA damage in the aged niche. The restoration of Netrin‐1, in a murine model, rejuvenates aged niches, restores DNA damage responses (DDR), and improves the capacity of HSCs to self‐renew and reconstitute multilineage hematopoiesis (Ramalingam et al. 2023).

Recent studies have highlighted that not all bone marrow compartments age uniformly. In mice, the calvarial bone marrow shows resistance to several classical hallmarks of niche aging (Koh et al. 2024). Unlike the femoral BM, which exhibits vascular rarefaction, adipogenic replacement, and compromised niche integrity, the skull BM undergoes progressive expansion of marrow space and sinusoidal networks during adulthood with maintained sinusoidal integrity and low adiposity; human calvarial marrow shows analogous features by imaging although mechanistic data are largely murine (Koh et al. 2024). This compartment maintains low adiposity and is less prone to the upregulation of inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1 and TNF‐α with age, potentially preserving a more supportive environment for hematopoiesis and offering a unique microenvironmental resilience against aging‐induced HSC dysfunction.

Concomitantly, biomechanical changes within the BM niche also contribute to hematopoietic aging. In mice, in situ atomic force microscopy has revealed that BM matrix stiffness increases with age, which negatively regulates the expression of HSC niche factors by bone marrow stromal cells (Zhang, Cao, et al. 2023). Mechanistically, this stiffening activates Yap/Taz signaling, impairing the stromal support of HSCs. Soft matrix conditions, in contrast, promote niche factor expression and facilitate HSC maintenance and lymphopoiesis, suggesting that matrix stiffness represents a previously underappreciated yet targetable dimension of the aging niche.

In humans, aging is also associated with altered spatial relationships between hematopoietic cells and adipocytes within the marrow (Aguilar‐Navarro et al. 2020). Increased BM adiposity correlates with higher density and proximity of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors to adipocytes, potentially promoting myeloid skewing through paracrine or metabolic mechanisms. Despite stable stromal cell numbers, the redistribution of HSPCs toward adipocyte‐rich areas may contribute to the functional decline of hematopoiesis observed in aged individuals. Parallel observations in human femoral bone marrow have shown that increased marrow fat with age is linked to reduced side population HSCs and diminished levels of IGF‐1 and CXCL12, key cytokines involved in HSC maintenance and homing (Tuljapurkar et al. 2011).

4.2. Age‐Associated Inflammatory Remodeling of the Hematopoietic Niche

Aging profoundly alters the BM microenvironment. In mice, age‐related deterioration of the niche includes a reduction in osteoprogenitor cells, expansion of pro‐inflammatory LepR+ mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), and degradation of sinusoidal vasculature, creating a chronically inflamed environment that disrupts HSC quiescence and self‐renewal (Mitchell et al. 2023). Notably, in aged mice, IL‐1β produced by damaged endosteal cells drives inflammation and stress‐induced myelopoiesis in HSPCs, resulting in myeloid‐biased differentiation and impaired regeneration; genetic or pharmacologic blockade of IL‐1 signaling in mice alleviates these defects (Mitchell et al. 2023).

Chronic inflammatory stress is a well‐established driver of HSC dysfunction. Models involving sustained TNF‐α or IFN‐α exposure have shown that prolonged inflammatory signaling induces irreversible HSC proliferation, functional exhaustion, and myeloid skewing, thereby recapitulating features of aged hematopoiesis (Esplin et al. 2011; Pietras et al. 2016; Mitroulis et al. 2018). Building on this, recent murine work has provided definitive evidence that even discrete and temporally separated inflammatory episodes cause long‐lasting and cumulative impairments in HSC self‐renewal capacity, with no recovery observed up to 1 year post‐challenge (Bogeska et al. 2022). This study provides direct proof‐of‐principle that even transient inflammatory insults, when repeated, can program irreversible aging‐like features into the hematopoietic system, including functional exhaustion, myeloid‐skewed differentiation, and reduced clonal complexity.

The gut microbiota also emerges as a key regulator of this inflammatory remodeling. Transplantation of the fecal microbiota from young mice into aged recipients rejuvenates aged HSCs by attenuating inflammatory signaling and restoring lymphoid potential (Zeng et al. 2023). This rejuvenation is associated with reduced IL‐1 signaling, increased expression of Foxo‐associated genes, and reshaped metabolite profiles, particularly involving tryptophan derivatives and SCFA‐producing bacteria such as Lachnospiraceae. Recent work using Dnmt3a‐mutant mouse models has further revealed that impaired gut barrier integrity with age permits systemic dissemination of the bacterial metabolite ADP‐heptose, which activates ALPK1–NF‐κB signaling in pre‐leukemic HSCs, promoting their clonal expansion and niche inflammation (Agarwal et al. 2025). Collectively, these murine data establish causal links between inflammation, microbiome dysregulation, and HSC aging. Yet, whether similar interventions can modulate human BM niches remains an open question, highlighting an important translational frontier.

4.3. Endothelial and Osteoblastic Niche Decline

Bone marrow endothelial cells (BMECs) and osteoblasts are essential components of the hematopoietic niche, supporting vascular integrity and HSC maintenance (Morrison and Scadden 2014; Kopp et al. 2005; Poulos et al. 2015; Taichman and Emerson 1994; Calvi et al. 2003). In mice, aging impairs BMEC function, leading to enhanced vascular permeability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, hypoxia, and reduced expression of critical support factors, such as SCF and CXCL12 (Poulos et al. 2017). These changes disrupt angiocrine signaling and skew HSC differentiation toward myeloid lineages (Boueya et al. 2024). Experimental infusion of aged ECs into young mice confirms their detrimental effects on hematopoietic recovery and lineage balance.

In parallel, murine studies have shown that aging reduces osteoblast numbers and function, particularly impairing the support of lymphoid‐biased HSCs (Calvi et al. 2003). Osteoblastic decline exacerbates the shift toward myeloid dominance and diminishes regenerative capacity. Furthermore, the intrinsic composition of HSCs shifts with age, favoring the expansion of myeloid‐biased over lymphoid‐biased clones—an imbalance reinforced by niche deterioration.

Emerging human studies provide correlative evidence for similar processes. Spatial transcriptomic and histological analyses of aged human bone marrow reveal loss of arteriolar endosteal niches, reduced CXCL12+ stromal populations, and increased marrow adiposity, each associated with altered HSPC localization and lineage bias (Kovtonyuk et al. 2016; Ho et al. 2019). However, direct functional evidence in humans that endothelial or osteoblastic aging causally impairs HSC support remains limited, with most mechanistic data still derived from murine models.

5. Systemic Interactions—Hematopoietic Aging and Other Organs

5.1. Hematopoietic Aging and Clonal Hematopoiesis in Systemic Aging

CHIP is associated with a significant increase in all‐cause mortality, primarily driven by cardiovascular events rather than hematologic malignancy. Age‐associated somatic mutations such as TET2, DNMT3A, and ASXL1 promote the expansion of mutant hematopoietic clones, driving systemic inflammation and vascular dysfunction (Jaiswal et al. 2017; Jaiswal and Ebert 2019; Cook et al. 2020; Jaiswal and Libby 2020) (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Clonal hematopoiesis as a systemic amplifier of aging‐related disease. With aging, hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) populations progressively lose clonal diversity, while a subset of clones acquires a fitness advantage, leading to clonal dominance. This process is frequently driven by clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP)–associated somatic mutations, including TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, and JAK2, as well as by age‐related chromosomal mosaicism such as mosaic loss of the Y chromosome (mLOY). Expanded mutant HSC‐derived clones promote mutation‐dependent inflammatory programs in circulating myeloid cells, contributing to systemic inflammation and increased risk of age‐related diseases, particularly cardiovascular diseases. *AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; PAD, peripheral artery disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Mechanistic research using murine models has revealed that mutant myeloid cells harboring CHIP‐associated mutations secrete elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1β and IL‐6, promoting vascular inflammation and atherogenesis (Fuster et al. 2017; Sano et al. 2018; Fidler et al. 2021; Sato et al. 2024). Consistently, large‐scale human genomic analyses have shown that individuals with CHIP exhibit elevated circulating IL‐6 levels, further supporting the presence of a systemic proinflammatory state in CHIP carriers (Bick et al. 2020). However, not all CHIP‐associated mutations confer identical biological behavior or therapeutic responsiveness. For example, IL‐1β levels are significantly elevated only in TET2‐mutant CHIP, whereas IL‐18 is selectively upregulated in JAK2‐mutant CHIP, suggesting that distinct driver mutations engage divergent inflammatory pathways (Bick et al. 2020). Consistent with this, a secondary analysis of the CANTOS trial demonstrated that treatment with the IL‐1β‐neutralizing antibody canakinumab significantly reduced recurrent cardiovascular events in individuals harboring TET2 mutations, but not in those with non‐TET2 mutations or in CHIP‐negative individuals (Svensson et al. 2022). Analyses of the UK Biobank cohort revealed that CHIP is associated with an increased risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (Tan et al. 2025). This excess risk was attenuated in individuals carrying the IL6R p.Asp358Ala polymorphism, which is known to reduce IL‐6 signaling. Notably, however, among the major CHIP driver mutations, ASXL1‐mutant CHIP conferred the highest AAA risk, and this risk was not mitigated by the IL6R p.Asp358Ala variant. These observations suggest that CHIP is not a uniform entity and that its pathogenic and therapeutic implications may be highly mutation‐specific.

CHIP has also been causally linked to multiple forms of CVD, including coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), stroke, and peripheral artery disease (PAD) as well as non‐vascular disease like chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic liver disease (Jaiswal et al. 2017; Dorsheimer et al. 2019; Pascual‐Figal et al. 2021; Yu et al. 2021; Tan et al. 2025; Arends et al. 2023; Büttner et al. 2023). Although CHIP is most often discussed as a deleterious, pre‐malignant state, emerging data indicate that its impact may not be uniformly harmful. For instance, certain mutations, particularly in TET2, have been associated with a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease, possibly via altered microglial activity (Bouzid et al. 2023; Vicario et al. 2025). While recent studies report that the prevalence of CHIP increases notably among long‐lived individuals and have speculated about possible homeostatic benefits under aging‐related stress, these observations remain correlative and do not establish a causal or protective role for CH in longevity (Wang et al. 2024; Mitchell et al. 2022). These findings suggest that CHIP may exert context‐dependent effects, occasionally conferring advantages, even while overall it remains a major age‐related risk factor for hematologic and cardiovascular disease.

In addition to CHIP, other age‐related hematopoietic alterations contribute to cardiovascular pathology. For instance, mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs) and mosaic loss of the Y chromosome (mLOY) have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk via mechanisms overlapping with CHIP, such as impaired immune regulation and heightened vascular inflammation (Forsberg et al. 2014; Bruhn‐Olszewska et al. 2025).

Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that systemic inflammatory signals from non‐hematopoietic organs can also influence hematopoietic stem cell behavior. Notably, a murine stroke model revealed that acute cerebral ischemia triggers inflammatory cascades that epigenetically reprogram bone marrow HSCs, inducing sustained myeloid bias and contributing to remote cardiac fibrosis (Simats et al. 2024). This finding highlights a bidirectional axis between injured organs and the hematopoietic system, further emphasizing the central role of hematopoiesis in orchestrating age‐related disease across multiple organ systems.

5.2. Parabiosis Studies and Rejuvenation Insights

Heterochronic parabiosis—linking the bloodstreams of young and old animals—has revealed that youthful systemic factors can broadly rejuvenate aged tissues. Old mice paired with young partners exhibit enhanced muscle regeneration, improved hepatic regenerative capacity, revitalized neurogenic activity in the brain, and restored hematopoietic function (Conboy et al. 2005; Conboy et al. 2015). Such systemic rejuvenation has been observed in both mice and rats, spanning multiple organ systems. These benefits extend to mitotically active progenitors (e.g., neural stem/progenitor cells, muscle satellite cells, and HSCs) as well as post‐mitotic cells such as neurons, highlighting that age‐related decline is largely due to an adverse extrinsic milieu rather than irreversible intrinsic damage (Rando and Chang 2012; Conboy et al. 2013; Kase et al. 2019).

Mechanistically, exposure to young blood modulates key signaling pathways associated with aging. For example, elevated Wnt signaling in old muscles skews stem cells toward fibrogenic fates at the expense of regeneration, a change driven by age‐related systemic factors. In a young circulatory environment, this pro‐fibrotic influence is diminished, allowing aged muscle stem cells to resume youthful myogenesis (Brack et al. 2007). Moreover, the rejuvenation effects can persist even after parabiotic pairing, implying that youthful factors induce durable molecular changes—possibly a partial epigenetic reprogramming of aged cells—that reset tissue repair and maintenance programs (Conboy et al. 2005). Furthermore, Ma et al. and Pálovics et al. both performed single‐cell RNA‐seq atlases across multiple organs in heterochronic parabiosis, showing that exposure to young circulation partially reverses aging‐associated transcriptional programs in a cell type– and tissue‐specific manner (Ma et al. 2022; Pálovics et al. 2022). Notably, inflammatory and interferon response pathways were attenuated, whereas mitochondrial and proteostasis networks shifted toward more youthful states.

Within the hematopoietic system, heterochronic parabiosis produces mixed results. Although initial studies showed limited rejuvenation of aged hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) at the functional level, single‐cell transcriptomic analysis has revealed that youthful circulation reverses age‐associated gene expression patterns in subsets of HSCs, including genes involved in cytokine signaling, chromatin remodeling, and circadian regulation (Kuribayashi et al. 2020; Zhang, Lee, et al. 2023). Similarly, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), which support hematopoiesis and bone remodeling, exhibit improved chondrogenesis and ECM production under a youthful systemic influence, contributing to enhanced bone repair (Baht et al. 2015).

Encouraged by murine models, translational research has moved toward human applications. Early‐stage clinical trials, such as those involving human umbilical cord blood plasma (hUCBP), have shown modest benefits on DNA methylation GrimAge and some clinical biomarkers without serious adverse effects (Clement et al. 2022). The “PLASMA” trial and similar studies have tested the safety of young plasma transfusions in older individuals with Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease (Sha et al. 2019; Parker et al. 2020). However, clear evidence of efficacy remains elusive, and more robust, long‐term randomized trials are required.

The commercialization of youthful blood components raises broader ethical and logistical concerns. The limited supply of young plasma, coupled with the increasing demand among aging populations, risks exacerbating healthcare disparities.

5.3. Senescent Cell‐Driven Immune Evasion, Systemic Impact, and Therapeutic Strategies

Aging leads to immune senescence, characterized by diminished immune surveillance, as well as the progressive senescence of somatic cells across multiple organs. Under normal physiological conditions, senescent cells are recognized and cleared by cytotoxic lymphocytes, including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, which target stress‐induced or viral antigens such as HCMV‐gB expressed on senescent cells (Hasegawa et al. 2023). However, senescent cells acquire immune evasion mechanisms that enable them to escape clearance by cytotoxic T cells, thereby exacerbating systemic aging.

Senescent cells in various tissues upregulate immune checkpoint molecules such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) while secreting immunosuppressive SASP factors including IL‐6 and TGF‐β (Onorati et al. 2022). These changes create a local microenvironment that inhibits immune‐mediated clearance. The resultant immune evasion by senescent cells promotes their accumulation, driving chronic low‐grade inflammation, tumorigenesis, and multi‐organ dysfunction (Gorgoulis et al. 2019).

Emerging evidence shows that senescent cells exhibit heterogeneous expression of PD‐L1, which facilitates their evasion of CD8+ T cell‐mediated cytotoxicity. With age, PD‐L1+ senescent cells accumulate in vivo, exhibiting enhanced SASP‐driven inflammation. Notably, immune checkpoint blockade restores immune‐mediated clearance of PD‐L1+ senescent cells, leading to functional improvements such as better lung function, reduced hepatic steatosis, and enhanced motor performance in aged mice (Wang et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2024). These findings highlight the central role of the PD‐1/PD‐L1 pathway in mediating immune escape by senescent cells, linking local cellular senescence to systemic aging.

Therapeutic strategies targeting senescent cells, including senolytics such as dasatinib + quercetin, navitoclax, and fisetin, have demonstrated benefits in multiple aging organs in mice, improving vascular function, bone integrity, metabolic homeostasis, and physical performance, with early pilot studies suggesting feasibility in humans (Clayton et al. 2023; Roos et al. 2016; Farr et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2018; Hickson et al. 2019). Similarly, SGLT2 inhibition has been shown to reduce senescent cell burden and systemic inflammation in aged mice (Katsuumi et al. 2024). These data establish senolysis as a promising anti‐aging strategy; however, whether similar benefits extend to the hematopoietic system is unknown, as no studies to date have demonstrated rejuvenation of aged HSCs or reversal of bone marrow senescence through senolytic treatment. Further work is required to determine whether systemic senolysis can modulate clonal hematopoiesis, immune aging, or age‐associated remodeling of the bone marrow niche, representing an important translational frontier for the field.

5.4. Repositioning Hematopoietic Aging as a Systemic Therapeutic Axis

Hematopoietic aging extends far beyond the confines of the bone marrow, functioning as a central regulator of systemic decline through its influence on inflammation, immune dysregulation, and inter‐organ communication. Moreover, reciprocal signaling from peripheral organs, such as the brain and gut, further shapes hematopoietic aging, highlighting the bidirectional nature of these interactions (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Overview of the bidirectional interactions between hematopoietic aging and systemic aging. Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) – intrinsic aging and age‐related alterations in the bone marrow niche drive myeloid skewing, immunosenescence, and a chronic pro‐inflammatory state. These hematopoietic changes impair immune surveillance and contribute to systemic aging, increasing organ vulnerability and susceptibility to age‐related diseases. In turn, systemic inflammatory cues and extrinsic age‐related factors, including dysbiosis and thymic involution, further exacerbate hematopoietic dysfunction, establishing a feed‐forward loop.

Therapeutically, targeting hematopoietic aging offers a unique opportunity to intercept multiple age‐related diseases through a common upstream axis. Anti‐inflammatory agents such as IL‐1β inhibitors have shown mutation‐specific efficacy in CHIP‐related cardiovascular disease. Senolytics and immune checkpoint blockade may mitigate the pro‐inflammatory burden of senescent cells, thereby restoring immune competence and reducing systemic frailty. Additionally, interventions such as microbiota transplantation, metabolic reprogramming, and parabiosis‐inspired strategies hold promise for rejuvenating hematopoietic and immune function. In the context of clonal hematopoiesis, particularly involving DNMT3A mutations, clonal expansion and the associated cardiovascular risk may be modulated through interventions targeting microbial and metabolic pathways.

Recognizing hematopoietic aging as a systemic amplifier of age‐related pathology shifts the paradigm from organ‐specific treatments to integrative, stem cell‐centered approaches. Future research should prioritize precision targeting of hematopoietic alterations, incorporating clonal, inflammatory, and metabolic profiles to guide personalized interventions aimed at extending healthspan and mitigating multimorbidity in the elderly.

6. Conclusion

The aging of the hematopoietic system is a hallmark of organismal aging, driven by intrinsic stem cell alterations, niche dysfunction, and systemic inflammatory changes. Age‐related hematopoietic dysfunction manifests as myeloid skewing, reduced lymphopoiesis, and increased susceptibility to infections, malignancies, and inflammatory diseases. Mechanistically, intrinsic alterations such as genomic instability, epigenetic drift, and metabolic reprogramming impair HSC function, while niche aging and systemic factors further intensify these effects. Importantly, hematopoietic aging is increasingly recognized as a central amplifier of systemic aging, influencing cardiovascular health, bone homeostasis, and immune regulation through clonal hematopoiesis and chronic inflammation. This reconceptualization opens new therapeutic possibilities: by targeting intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of hematopoietic aging, including senescent cells, mitochondrial dysfunction, and the aging microbiome, we may rejuvenate the hematopoietic system, mitigate multimorbidity, and extend healthspan. Advancing our understanding of hematopoietic aging is thus critical for designing stem cell‐centered strategies to promote healthy aging in the broader population.

Author Contributions

The original draft was written by M.M., S.H., and conceptualization was done by Y.K. Editing of the manuscript was done by S.O. and Y.K. Visualization was handled by Y.K. M.M.

Funding

This research was supported by the Fujita Mind‐Brain Research & Innovation Center for Drug Generation (Fujita Mind‐BRIDGe) of Japan's Peak Research Universities (J‐PEAKS) Program (JPJS00420240019) funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Ethics Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors have nothing to report.

Miyawaki, M. , Hashimoto S., Ogawa S., and Kase Y.. 2026. “Aging of the Hematopoietic System: Mechanisms, Consequences, and Systemic Interactions.” Aging Cell 25, no. 2: e70385. 10.1111/acel.70385.

Contributor Information

Sumito Ogawa, Email: suogawa@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Yoshitaka Kase, Email: kaseyoshitaka@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

References

  1. Agarwal, P. , Sampson A., Hueneman K., et al. 2025. “Microbial Metabolite Drives Ageing‐Related Clonal Haematopoiesis via ALPK1.” Nature 642: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguilar‐Navarro, A. G. , Meza‐León B., Gratzinger D., et al. 2020. “Human Aging Alters the Spatial Organization Between CD34+ Hematopoietic Cells and Adipocytes in Bone Marrow.” Stem Cell Reports 15, no. 2: 317–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aksöz, M. , Gafencu G.‐A., Stoilova B., et al. 2024. “Hematopoietic Stem Cell Heterogeneity and Age‐Associated Platelet Bias Are Evolutionarily Conserved.” Science Immunology 9, no. 98: eadk3469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ambrosi, T. H. , Scialdone A., Graja A., et al. 2017. “Adipocyte Accumulation in the Bone Marrow During Obesity and Aging Impairs Stem Cell‐Based Hematopoietic and Bone Regeneration.” Cell Stem Cell 20, no. 6: 771–784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arends, C. M. , Liman T. G., Strzelecka P. M., et al. 2023. “Associations of Clonal Hematopoiesis With Recurrent Vascular Events and Death in Patients With Incident Ischemic Stroke.” Blood 141, no. 7: 787–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baht, G. S. , Silkstone D., Vi L., et al. 2015. “Exposure to a Youthful Circulation Rejuvenates Bone Repair Through Modulation of β‐Catenin.” Nature Communications 6, no. 1: 7131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Beerman, I. , Bhattacharya D., Zandi S., et al. 2010. “Functionally Distinct Hematopoietic Stem Cells Modulate Hematopoietic Lineage Potential During Aging by a Mechanism of Clonal Expansion.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, no. 12: 5465–5470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Beerman, I. , and Rossi D. J.. 2015. “Epigenetic Control of Stem Cell Potential During Homeostasis, Aging, and Disease.” Cell Stem Cell 16, no. 6: 613–625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bick, A. G. , Weinstock J. S., Nandakumar S. K., et al. 2020. “Inherited Causes of Clonal Haematopoiesis in 97,691 Whole Genomes.” Nature 586, no. 7831: 763–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bogeska, R. , Mikecin A.‐M., Kaschutnig P., et al. 2022. “Inflammatory Exposure Drives Long‐Lived Impairment of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Self‐Renewal Activity and Accelerated Aging.” Cell Stem Cell 29, no. 8: 1273–1284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boueya, I. , Sandhow L., Albuquerque J., Znaidi R., and Passaro D.. 2024. “Endothelial Heterogeneity in Bone Marrow: Insights Across Development, Adult Life and Leukemia.” Leukemia 39: 1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bouzid, H. , Belk J. A., Jan M., et al. 2023. “Clonal Hematopoiesis Is Associated With Protection From Alzheimer's Disease.” Nature Medicine 29, no. 7: 1662–1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brack, A. S. , Conboy M. J., Roy S., et al. 2007. “Increased Wnt Signaling During Aging Alters Muscle Stem Cell Fate and Increases Fibrosis.” Science 317, no. 5839: 807–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bratic, A. , and Larsson N.‐G.. 2013. “The Role of Mitochondria in Aging.” Journal of Clinical Investigation 123, no. 3: 951–957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bruhn‐Olszewska, B. , Markljung E., Rychlicka‐Buniowska E., Sarkisyan D., Filipowicz N., and Dumanski J. P.. 2025. “The Effects of Loss of Y Chromosome on Male Health.” Nature Reviews Genetics 26: 1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Büttner, P. , Böttner J., Krohn K., et al. 2023. “Clonal Hematopoiesis Mutations Are Present in Atherosclerotic Lesions in Peripheral Artery Disease.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 4: 3962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Calvi, L. , Adams G., Weibrecht K., et al. 2003. “Osteoblastic Cells Regulate the Haematopoietic Stem Cell Niche.” Nature 425, no. 6960: 841–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Clayton, Z. S. , Rossman M. J., Mahoney S. A., et al. 2023. “Cellular Senescence Contributes to Large Elastic Artery Stiffening and Endothelial Dysfunction With Aging: Amelioration With Senolytic Treatment.” Hypertension 80, no. 10: 2072–2087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Clement, J. , Yan Q., Agrawal M., et al. 2022. “Umbilical Cord Plasma Concentrate has Beneficial Effects on DNA Methylation GrimAge and Human Clinical Biomarkers.” Aging Cell 21, no. 10: e13696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Conboy, I. M. , Conboy M. J., and Rebo J.. 2015. “Systemic Problems: A Perspective on Stem Cell Aging and Rejuvenation.” Aging (Albany NY) 7, no. 10: 754–765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Conboy, I. M. , Conboy M. J., Wagers A. J., Girma E. R., Weissman I. L., and Rando T. A.. 2005. “Rejuvenation of Aged Progenitor Cells by Exposure to a Young Systemic Environment.” Nature 433, no. 7027: 760–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Conboy, M. J. , Conboy I. M., and Rando T. A.. 2013. “Heterochronic Parabiosis: Historical Perspective and Methodological Considerations for Studies of Aging and Longevity.” Aging Cell 12, no. 3: 525–530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cook, E. K. , Luo M., and Rauh M. J.. 2020. “Clonal Hematopoiesis and Inflammation: Partners in Leukemogenesis and Comorbidity.” Experimental Hematology 83: 85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. De Haan, G. , and Lazare S. S.. 2018. “Aging of Hematopoietic Stem Cells.” Blood 131, no. 5: 479–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dellorusso, P. V. , Proven M. A., Calero‐Nieto F. J., et al. 2024. “Autophagy Counters Inflammation‐Driven Glycolytic Impairment in Aging Hematopoietic Stem Cells.” Cell Stem Cell 31, no. 7: 1020–1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dorsheimer, L. , Assmus B., Rasper T., et al. 2019. “Association of Mutations Contributing to Clonal Hematopoiesis With Prognosis in Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure.” JAMA Cardiology 4, no. 1: 25–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Esplin, B. L. , Shimazu T., Welner R. S., et al. 2011. “Chronic Exposure to a TLR Ligand Injures Hematopoietic Stem Cells.” Journal of Immunology 186, no. 9: 5367–5375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Evans, M. A. , and Walsh K.. 2023. “Clonal Hematopoiesis, Somatic Mosaicism, and Age‐Associated Disease.” Physiological Reviews 103, no. 1: 649–716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Farr, J. N. , Xu M., Weivoda M. M., et al. 2017. “Targeting Cellular Senescence Prevents Age‐Related Bone Loss in Mice.” Nature Medicine 23, no. 9: 1072–1079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fidler, T. P. , Xue C., Yalcinkaya M., et al. 2021. “The AIM2 Inflammasome Exacerbates Atherosclerosis in Clonal Haematopoiesis.” Nature 592, no. 7853: 296–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Flach, J. , Bakker S. T., Mohrin M., et al. 2014. “Replication Stress Is a Potent Driver of Functional Decline in Ageing Haematopoietic Stem Cells.” Nature 512, no. 7513: 198–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Flohr Svendsen, A. , Yang D., Kim K., et al. 2021. “A Comprehensive Transcriptome Signature of Murine Hematopoietic Stem Cell Aging.” Blood, the Journal of the American Society of Hematology 138, no. 6: 439–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Florian, M. C. , Klose M., Sacma M., et al. 2018. “Aging Alters the Epigenetic Asymmetry of HSC Division.” PLoS Biology 16, no. 9: e2003389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Forsberg, L. A. , Rasi C., Malmqvist N., et al. 2014. “Mosaic Loss of Chromosome Y in Peripheral Blood Is Associated With Shorter Survival and Higher Risk of Cancer.” Nature Genetics 46, no. 6: 624–628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Franck, M. , Tanner K. T., Tennyson R. L., et al. 2025. “Nonuniversality of Inflammaging Across Human Populations.” Nature Aging 5: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Fukushima, Y. , Minato N., and Hattori M.. 2018. “The Impact of Senescence‐Associated T Cells on Immunosenescence and Age‐Related Disorders.” Inflammation and Regeneration 38: 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fuster, J. J. , MacLauchlan S., Zuriaga M. A., et al. 2017. “Clonal Hematopoiesis Associated With TET2 Deficiency Accelerates Atherosclerosis Development in Mice.” Science 355, no. 6327: 842–847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gorgoulis, V. , Adams P. D., Alimonti A., et al. 2019. “Cellular Senescence: Defining a Path Forward.” Cell 179, no. 4: 813–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hammond, C. A. , Wu S. W., Wang F., MacAldaz M. E., and Eaves C. J.. 2023. “Aging Alters the Cell Cycle Control and Mitogenic Signaling Responses of Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells.” Blood 141, no. 16: 1990–2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hasegawa, T. , Oka T., Son H. G., et al. 2023. “Cytotoxic CD4+ T Cells Eliminate Senescent Cells by Targeting Cytomegalovirus Antigen.” Cell 186, no. 7: 1417–1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hashimoto, K. , Kouno T., Ikawa T., et al. 2019. “Single‐Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Expansion of Cytotoxic CD4 T Cells in Supercentenarians.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no. 48: 24242–24251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hérault, L. , Poplineau M., Mazuel A., Platet N., Remy É., and Duprez E.. 2021. “Single‐Cell RNA‐Seq Reveals a Concomitant Delay in Differentiation and Cell Cycle of Aged Hematopoietic Stem Cells.” BMC Biology 19, no. 1: 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hickson, L. J. , Prata L. G. L., Bobart S. A., et al. 2019. “Senolytics Decrease Senescent Cells in Humans: Preliminary Report From a Clinical Trial of Dasatinib Plus Quercetin in Individuals With Diabetic Kidney Disease.” eBioMedicine 47: 446–456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ho, Y.‐H. , Del Toro R., Rivera‐Torres J., et al. 2019. “Remodeling of Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Stem Cell Niches Promotes Myeloid Cell Expansion During Premature or Physiological Aging.” Cell Stem Cell 25, no. 3: 407–418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hong, T. , Li J., Guo L., et al. 2023. “TET2 Modulates Spatial Relocalization of Heterochromatin in Aged Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells.” Nature Aging 3, no. 11: 1387–1400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hosseini, M. , Voisin V., Chegini A., et al. 2025. “Metformin Reduces the Competitive Advantage of Dnmt3a R878H HSPCs.” Nature 642: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Iltis, C. , Moskalevska I., Debiesse A., et al. 2025. “A Ganglioside‐Based Immune Checkpoint Enables Senescent Cells to Evade Immunosurveillance During Aging.” Nature Aging 5, no. 2: 219–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Itokawa, N. , Oshima M., Koide S., et al. 2022. “Epigenetic Traits Inscribed in Chromatin Accessibility in Aged Hematopoietic Stem Cells.” Nature Communications 13, no. 1: 2691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Jaiswal, S. , and Ebert B. L.. 2019. “Clonal Hematopoiesis in Human Aging and Disease.” Science 366, no. 6465: eaan4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Jaiswal, S. , Fontanillas P., Flannick J., et al. 2014. “Age‐Related Clonal Hematopoiesis Associated With Adverse Outcomes.” New England Journal of Medicine 371, no. 26: 2488–2498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jaiswal, S. , and Libby P.. 2020. “Clonal Haematopoiesis: Connecting Ageing and Inflammation in Cardiovascular Disease.” Nature Reviews Cardiology 17, no. 3: 137–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jaiswal, S. , Natarajan P., Silver A. J., et al. 2017. “Clonal Hematopoiesis and Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.” New England Journal of Medicine 377, no. 2: 111–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jang, G. , Contreras Castillo S., Esteva E., et al. 2023. “Stem Cell Decoupling Underlies Impaired Lymphoid Development During Aging.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, no. 22: e2302019120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kase, Y. , Otsu K., Shimazaki T., and Okano H.. 2019. “Involvement of p38 in Age‐Related Decline in Adult Neurogenesis via Modulation of Wnt Signaling.” Stem Cell Reports 12, no. 6: 1313–1328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Katsuumi, G. , Shimizu I., Suda M., et al. 2024. “SGLT2 Inhibition Eliminates Senescent Cells and Alleviates Pathological Aging.” Nature Aaging 4, no. 7: 926–938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kawamoto, S. , Uemura K., Hori N., et al. 2023. “Bacterial Induction of B Cell Senescence Promotes Age‐Related Changes in the Gut Microbiota.” Nature Cell Biology 25, no. 6: 865–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kirschner, K. , Chandra T., Kiselev V., et al. 2017. “Proliferation Drives Aging‐Related Functional Decline in a Subpopulation of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Compartment.” Cell Reports 19, no. 8: 1503–1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Koh, B. I. , Mohanakrishnan V., Jeong H.‐W., et al. 2024. “Adult Skull Bone Marrow Is an Expanding and Resilient Haematopoietic Reservoir.” Nature 636: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Komic, H. , Schmachtel T., Simoes C., et al. 2025. “Continuous Map of Early Hematopoietic Stem Cell Differentiation Across Human Lifetime.” Nature Communications 16, no. 1: 2287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Konturek‐Ciesla, A. , Dhapola P., Zhang Q., et al. 2023. “Temporal Multimodal Single‐Cell Profiling of Native Hematopoiesis Illuminates Altered Differentiation Trajectories With Age.” Cell Reports 42, no. 4: 112304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kopp, H.‐G. , Avecilla S. T., Hooper A. T., and Rafii S.. 2005. “The Bone Marrow Vascular Niche: Home of HSC Differentiation and Mobilization.” Physiology 20, no. 5: 349–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kovtonyuk, L. V. , Fritsch K., Feng X., Manz M. G., and Takizawa H.. 2016. “Inflamm‐Aging of Hematopoiesis, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, and the Bone Marrow Microenvironment.” Frontiers in Immunology 7: 502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kowalczyk, M. S. , Tirosh I., Heckl D., et al. 2015. “Single‐Cell RNA‐Seq Reveals Changes in Cell Cycle and Differentiation Programs Upon Aging of Hematopoietic Stem Cells.” Genome Research 25, no. 12: 1860–1872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kuribayashi, W. , Oshima M., Itokawa N., et al. 2020. “Limited Rejuvenation of Aged Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Young Bone Marrow Niche.” Journal of Experimental Medicine 218, no. 3: e20192283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lee, Y.‐h. , Kim S. R., Han D. H., et al. 2019. “Senescent T Cells Predict the Development of Hyperglycemia in Humans.” Diabetes 68, no. 1: 156–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Liu, Z. , Liang Q., Ren Y., et al. 2023. “Immunosenescence: Molecular Mechanisms and Diseases.” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 8, no. 1: 200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lu, Y. , Ruan Y., Hong P., et al. 2023. “T‐Cell Senescence: A Crucial Player in Autoimmune Diseases.” Clinical Immunology 248: 109202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ma, S. , Wang S., Ye Y., et al. 2022. “Heterochronic Parabiosis Induces Stem Cell Revitalization and Systemic Rejuvenation Across Aged Tissues.” Cell Stem Cell 29, no. 6: 990–1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Majewska, J. , Agrawal A., Mayo A., et al. 2024. “p16‐Dependent Increase of PD‐L1 Stability Regulates Immunosurveillance of Senescent Cells.” Nature Cell Biology 26, no. 8: 1336–1345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Manso, B. A. , Medina P., Smith‐Berdan S., et al. 2025. “A Rare Hematopoietic Stem Cell‐Derived Megakaryocyte Progenitor Accumulates via Enhanced Survival and Contributes to Exacerbated Thrombopoiesis Upon Aging.” Aging Cell 24: e70221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Martin, G. S. , Mannino D. M., and Moss M.. 2006. “The Effect of Age on the Development and Outcome of Adult Sepsis.” Critical Care Medicine 34, no. 1: 15–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Mitchell, C. A. , Verovskaya E. V., Calero‐Nieto F. J., et al. 2023. “Stromal Niche Inflammation Mediated by IL‐1 Signalling Is a Targetable Driver of Haematopoietic Ageing.” Nature Cell Biology 25, no. 1: 30–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Mitchell, E. , Spencer Chapman M., Williams N., et al. 2022. “Clonal Dynamics of Haematopoiesis Across the Human Lifespan.” Nature 606, no. 7913: 343–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Mitroulis, I. , Ruppova K., Wang B., et al. 2018. “Modulation of Myelopoiesis Progenitors Is an Integral Component of Trained Immunity.” Cell 172, no. 1: 147–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Morganti, C. , and Ito K.. 2021. “Mitochondrial Contributions to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Aging.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 20: 11117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Morrison, S. J. , and Scadden D. T.. 2014. “The Bone Marrow Niche for Haematopoietic Stem Cells.” Nature 505, no. 7483: 327–334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Nakatani, T. , Sugiyama T., Omatsu Y., Watanabe H., Kondoh G., and Nagasawa T.. 2023. “Ebf3+ Niche‐Derived CXCL12 Is Required for the Localization and Maintenance of Hematopoietic Stem Cells.” Nature Communications 14, no. 1: 6402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nikolich‐Žugich, J. 2018. “The Twilight of Immunity: Emerging Concepts in Aging of the Immune System.” Nature Immunology 19, no. 1: 10–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Ogawa, T. , Kitagawa M., and Hirokawa K.. 2000. “Age‐Related Changes of Human Bone Marrow: A Histometric Estimation of Proliferative Cells, Apoptotic Cells, T Cells, B Cells and Macrophages.” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 117, no. 1–3: 57–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Onorati, A. , Havas A. P., Lin B., et al. 2022. “Upregulation of PD‐L1 in Senescence and Aging.” Molecular and Cellular Biology 42, no. 10: e00171‐00122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Pálovics, R. , Keller A., Schaum N., et al. 2022. “Molecular Hallmarks of Heterochronic Parabiosis at Single‐Cell Resolution.” Nature 603, no. 7900: 309–314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Pang, W. W. , Price E. A., Sahoo D., et al. 2011. “Human Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Stem Cells Are Increased in Frequency and Myeloid‐Biased With Age.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, no. 50: 20012–20017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Parker, J. E. , Martinez A., Deutsch G. K., et al. 2020. “Safety of Plasma Infusions in Parkinson's Disease.” Movement Disorders 35, no. 11: 1905–1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Pascual‐Figal, D. A. , Bayes‐Genis A., Díez‐Díez M., et al. 2021. “Clonal Hematopoiesis and Risk of Progression of Heart Failure With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 77, no. 14: 1747–1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Pellegrino, R. , Paganelli R., Di Iorio A., et al. 2024. “Neutrophil, Lymphocyte Count, and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Predict Multimorbidity and Mortality—Results From the Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging Follow‐Up Study.” Geroscience 46, no. 3: 3047–3059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Pietras, E. M. , Mirantes‐Barbeito C., Fong S., et al. 2016. “Chronic Interleukin‐1 Exposure Drives Haematopoietic Stem Cells Towards Precocious Myeloid Differentiation at the Expense of Self‐Renewal.” Nature Cell Biology 18, no. 6: 607–618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Pinho, S. , and Frenette P. S.. 2019. “Haematopoietic Stem Cell Activity and Interactions With the Niche.” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 20, no. 5: 303–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Pinho, S. , and Zhao M.. 2024. “Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Their Bone Marrow Niches.” In Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Keystone of Tissue Development and Regenerative Medicine, 17–28. Springer. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Poscablo, D. M. , Worthington A. K., Smith‐Berdan S., et al. 2024. “An Age‐Progressive Platelet Differentiation Path from Hematopoietic Stem Cells Causes Exacerbated Thrombosis.” Cell 187, no. 12: 3090–3107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Poulos, M. G. , Crowley M. J., Gutkin M. C., et al. 2015. “Vascular Platform to Define Hematopoietic Stem Cell Factors and Enhance Regenerative Hematopoiesis.” Stem Cell Reports 5, no. 5: 881–894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Poulos, M. G. , Ramalingam P., Gutkin M. C., et al. 2017. “Endothelial Transplantation Rejuvenates Aged Hematopoietic Stem Cell Function.” Journal of Clinical Investigation 127, no. 11: 4163–4178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Pruitt, A. , Gao F., De Togni E., et al. 2023. “Impact of Donor Age and Relationship on Outcomes of Peripheral Blood Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.” Bone Marrow Transplantation 58, no. 8: 855–862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Ramalingam, P. , Gutkin M. C., Poulos M. G., et al. 2023. “Restoring Bone Marrow Niche Function Rejuvenates Aged Hematopoietic Stem Cells by Reactivating the DNA Damage Response.” Nature Communications 14, no. 1: 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Rando, T. A. , and Chang H. Y.. 2012. “Aging, Rejuvenation, and Epigenetic Reprogramming: Resetting the Aging Clock.” Cell 148, no. 1: 46–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Reusswig, F. , An O., and Deppermann C.. 2024. “Platelet Life Cycle During Aging: Function, Production and Clearance.” Platelets 35, no. 1: 2433750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Robertson, A.‐K. L. , and Hansson G. r. K.. 2006. “T Cells in Atherogenesis: For Better or for Worse?” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 26, no. 11: 2421–2432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Roos, C. M. , Zhang B., Palmer A. K., et al. 2016. “Chronic Senolytic Treatment Alleviates Established Vasomotor Dysfunction in Aged or Atherosclerotic Mice.” Aging Cell 15, no. 5: 973–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Rossi, D. J. , Bryder D., Seita J., Nussenzweig A., Hoeijmakers J., and Weissman I. L.. 2007. “Deficiencies in DNA Damage Repair Limit the Function of Haematopoietic Stem Cells With Age.” Nature 447, no. 7145: 725–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Rübe, C. E. , Fricke A., Widmann T. A., et al. 2011. “Accumulation of DNA Damage in Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells During Human Aging.” PLoS One 6, no. 3: e17487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Sano, S. , Oshima K., Wang Y., Katanasaka Y., Sano M., and Walsh K.. 2018. “CRISPR‐Mediated Gene Editing to Assess the Roles of Tet2 and Dnmt3a in Clonal Hematopoiesis and Cardiovascular Disease.” Circulation Research 123, no. 3: 335–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Sano, S. , and Walsh K.. 2025. Loss of the Y Chromosome in Coronary Artery Disease, ehaf072. Oxford University Press UK. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Sato, N. , Goyama S., Chang Y.‐H., et al. 2024. “Clonal Hematopoiesis‐Related Mutant ASXL1 Promotes Atherosclerosis in Mice via Dysregulated Innate Immunity.” Nature Cardiovascular Research 3, no. 12: 1568–1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Säwen, P. , Eldeeb M., Erlandsson E., et al. 2018. “Murine HSCs Contribute Actively to Native Hematopoiesis but With Reduced Differentiation Capacity Upon Aging.” eLife 7: e41258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Scherer, M. , Singh I., Braun M. M., et al. 2025. “Clonal Tracing With Somatic Epimutations Reveals Dynamics of Blood Ageing.” Nature 643: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Sha, S. J. , Deutsch G. K., Tian L., et al. 2019. “Safety, Tolerability, and Feasibility of Young Plasma Infusion in the Plasma for Alzheimer Symptom Amelioration Study: A Randomized Clinical trial.” JAMA Neurology 76, no. 1: 35–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Shimatani, K. , Nakashima Y., Hattori M., Hamazaki Y., and Minato N.. 2009. “PD‐1+ Memory Phenotype CD4+ T Cells Expressing C/EBPα Underlie T Cell Immunodepression in Senescence and Leukemia.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, no. 37: 15807–15812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Simats, A. , Zhang S., Messerer D., et al. 2024. “Innate Immune Memory After Brain Injury Drives Inflammatory Cardiac Dysfunction.” Cell 187, no. 17: 4637–4655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Stucker, S. , Chen J., Watt F. E., and Kusumbe A. P.. 2020. “Bone Angiogenesis and Vascular Niche Remodeling in Stress, Aging, and Diseases.” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 8: 602269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Su, T.‐Y. , Hauenstein J., Somuncular E., et al. 2024. “Aging Is Associated With Functional and Molecular Changes in Distinct Hematopoietic Stem Cell Subsets.” Nature Communications 15, no. 1: 7966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Sudo, K. , Ema H., Morita Y., and Nakauchi H.. 2000. “Age‐Associated Characteristics of Murine Hematopoietic Stem Cells.” Journal of Experimental Medicine 192, no. 9: 1273–1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Sun, D. , Luo M., Jeong M., et al. 2014. “Epigenomic Profiling of Young and Aged HSCs Reveals Concerted Changes During Aging That Reinforce Self‐Renewal.” Cell Stem Cell 14, no. 5: 673–688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Svensson, E. C. , Madar A., Campbell C. D., et al. 2022. “TET2‐Driven Clonal Hematopoiesis and Response to Canakinumab: An Exploratory Analysis of the CANTOS Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA Cardiology 7, no. 5: 521–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Tahir, S. , Fukushima Y., Sakamoto K., et al. 2015. “A CD153+ CD4+ T Follicular Cell Population With Cell‐Senescence Features Plays a Crucial Role in Lupus Pathogenesis via Osteopontin Production.” Journal of Immunology 194, no. 12: 5725–5735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Taichman, R. S. , and Emerson S. G.. 1994. “Human Osteoblasts Support Hematopoiesis Through the Production of Granulocyte Colony‐Stimulating Factor.” Journal of Experimental Medicine 179, no. 5: 1677–1682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Tan, Y. , Zhu X., Huang Y., et al. 2025. “Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential Is Associated With Incident Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 45, no. 7: 1326–1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Thompson, D. J. , Genovese G., Halvardson J., et al. 2019. “Genetic Predisposition to Mosaic Y Chromosome Loss in Blood.” Nature 575, no. 7784: 652–657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Totani, H. , Matsumura T., Yokomori R., et al. 2025. “Mitochondria‐Enriched Hematopoietic Stem Cells Exhibit Elevated Self‐Renewal Capabilities, Thriving Within the Context of Aged Bone Marrow.” Nature Aging 5: 1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Tuljapurkar, S. R. , McGuire T. R., Brusnahan S. K., et al. 2011. “Changes in Human Bone Marrow Fat Content Associated With Changes in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Numbers and Cytokine Levels With Aging.” Journal of Anatomy 219, no. 5: 574–581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Urbanus, J. , Cosgrove J., Beltman J. B., et al. 2023. “DRAG In Situ Barcoding Reveals an Increased Number of HSPCs Contributing to Myelopoiesis With Age.” Nature Communications 14, no. 1: 2184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Vicario, R. , Fragkogianni S., Weber L., et al. 2025. “A Microglia Clonal Inflammatory Disorder in Alzheimer's Disease.” eLife 13: RP96519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Wang, J. , Sun Q., Morita Y., et al. 2012. “A Differentiation Checkpoint Limits Hematopoietic Stem Cell Self‐Renewal in Response to DNA Damage.” Cell 148, no. 5: 1001–1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Wang, K. , Zhang W., Yi L., et al. 2024. “The Impact of Age and Number of Mutations on the Size of Clonal Hematopoiesis.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, no. 8: e2319364121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Wang, T.‐W. , Johmura Y., Suzuki N., et al. 2022. “Blocking PD‐L1–PD‐1 Improves Senescence Surveillance and Ageing Phenotypes.” Nature 611, no. 7935: 358–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Warr, M. R. , Binnewies M., Flach J., et al. 2013. “FOXO3A Directs a Protective Autophagy Program in Haematopoietic Stem Cells.” Nature 494, no. 7437: 323–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Watanuki, S. , Kobayashi H., Sugiura Y., et al. 2024. “SDHAF1 Confers Metabolic Resilience to Aging Hematopoietic Stem Cells by Promoting Mitochondrial ATP Production.” Cell Stem Cell 31, no. 8: 1145–1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Watson, C. J. , Papula A., Poon G. Y., et al. 2020. “The Evolutionary Dynamics and Fitness Landscape of Clonal Hematopoiesis.” Science 367, no. 6485: 1449–1454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. White, R. H. 2003. “The Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism.” Circulation 107, no. 23_suppl_1: 4–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Xu, M. , Pirtskhalava T., Farr J. N., et al. 2018. “Senolytics Improve Physical Function and Increase Lifespan in Old Age.” Nature Medicine 24, no. 8: 1246–1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Yahata, T. , Takanashi T., Muguruma Y., et al. 2011. “Accumulation of Oxidative DNA Damage Restricts the Self‐Renewal Capacity of Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells.” Blood, the Journal of the American Society of Hematology 118, no. 11: 2941–2950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Young, A. L. , Challen G. A., Birmann B. M., and Druley T. E.. 2016. “Clonal Haematopoiesis Harbouring AML‐Associated Mutations Is Ubiquitous in Healthy Adults.” Nature Communications 7, no. 1: 12484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Yu, B. , Roberts M. B., Raffield L. M., et al. 2021. “Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis With Incident Heart Failure.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 78, no. 1: 42–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Zeng, X. , Li X., Li X., et al. 2023. “Fecal Microbiota Transplantation From Young Mice Rejuvenates Aged Hematopoietic Stem Cells by Suppressing Inflammation.” Blood 141, no. 14: 1691–1707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Zhang, B. , Lee D. E., Trapp A., et al. 2023. “Multi‐Omic Rejuvenation and Lifespan Extension on Exposure to Youthful Circulation.” Nature Aging 3, no. 8: 948–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Zhang, X. , Cao D., Xu L., et al. 2023. “Harnessing Matrix Stiffness to Engineer a Bone Marrow Niche for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Rejuvenation.” Cell Stem Cell 30, no. 4: 378–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.


Articles from Aging Cell are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES