Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1990 Jul;58(1):143–148. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82360-2

Frequency domain analysis of membrane capacitance of cultured cells (HeLa and myeloma) using the micropipette technique.

K Asami 1, Y Takahashi 1, S Takashima 1
PMCID: PMC1280947  PMID: 2383628

Abstract

The membrane capacitance and conductance of cultured cells (HeLa and mouse myeloma) are investigated using the micropipette method. Mean values of the membrane capacities were found to be 1.9 microF/cm2 for HeLa cells and 1.0 microF/cm2 for myeloma cells. These values are in agreement with those obtained using the suspension method. Whereas the suspension method is unable to provide the information on membrane conductance, the micropipette method is able to measure even an extremely small membrane conductance if leakage current is negligibly small. The membrane conductances were found, using this technique, to be approximately 90-100 microS/cm2 for both HeLa and myeloma cells. One of the purposes of this study is to establish the frequency profile of membrane capacitance. It was found, however, that membrane capacitances of these cells are independent of frequency between 1 Hz and 1 KHz within the resolution of this technique.

Full text

PDF
143

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong C. M., Bezanilla F. Charge movement associated with the opening and closing of the activation gates of the Na channels. J Gen Physiol. 1974 May;63(5):533–552. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.5.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asami K., Takahashi Y., Takashima S. Dielectric properties of mouse lymphocytes and erythrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989 Jan 17;1010(1):49–55. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(89)90183-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fishman H. M., Poussart D. J., Moore L. E., Siebenga E. K+ conduction description from the low frequency impedance and admittance of squid axon. J Membr Biol. 1977 Apr 22;32(3-4):255–290. doi: 10.1007/BF01905222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fishman H. M., Poussart D., Moore L. E. Complex admittance of Na+ conduction in squid axon. J Membr Biol. 1979 Oct 5;50(1):43–63. doi: 10.1007/BF01868787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keynes R. D., Rojas E. Kinetics and steady-state properties of the charged system controlling sodium conductance in the squid giant axon. J Physiol. 1974 Jun;239(2):393–434. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Takashima S., Asami K., Takahashi Y. Frequency domain studies of impedance characteristics of biological cells using micropipet technique. I. Erythrocyte. Biophys J. 1988 Dec;54(6):995–1000. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83037-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Takashima S. Passive electrical properties and voltage dependent membrane capacitance of single skeletal muscle fibers. Pflugers Arch. 1985 Feb;403(2):197–204. doi: 10.1007/BF00584100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Takashima S., Schwan H. P. Passive electrical properties of squid axon membrane. J Membr Biol. 1974;17(1):51–68. doi: 10.1007/BF01870172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES