Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1990 Aug;58(2):533–547. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82397-3

Molecular dynamics of an in vacuo model of duplex d(CGCGAATTCGCG) in the B-form based on the amber 3.0 force field.

J Srinivasan 1, J M Withka 1, D L Beveridge 1
PMCID: PMC1280992  PMID: 2207251

Abstract

The characteristics of 100 ps of molecular dynamics (MD) on the DNA dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG) at 300 K are described and investigated. The simulation is based on an in vacuo model of the oligomer and the AMBER 3.0 force field configured in the manner of Singh, U. C., S. J. Weiner, and P. A. Kollman, (1985, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:755-759). The analysis of the results was carried out using the "curves, dials, and windows" procedure (Ravishanker, G., S. Swaminathan, D. L. Beveridge, R. Lavery, and H. Sklenar. 1989. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 6:669-699). The results indicate this dynamical model to be a provisionally stable double helix which lies at approximately 3.2 A rms deviation from the canonical B-form. There is, however, a persistent nonplanarity in the base pair orientations which resemble that observed in canonical A-DNA. The major groove width is seen to narrow during the course of the simulation and the minor groove expands, contravariant to the alterations in groove width seen in the crystal structure of the native dodecamer (Drew, H. R., R. M. Wing, T. Takano, C. Broka, S. Tanaka, I. Itakura, and R. E. Dickerson, 1981. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:2179-2183). The propeller twist in the bases, the sequence dependence of the base pair roll and aspects of bending in the helix axis are in some degree of agreement with the crystal structure. The patterns in DNA bending are observed to follow Zhurkin theory (Zhurkin, V. B. 1985. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2:785-804.). The relationship between the dynamical model and structure in solution is discussed.

Full text

PDF
533

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnott S., Hukins D. W. Optimised parameters for A-DNA and B-DNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972 Jun 28;47(6):1504–1509. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(72)90243-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnott S., Hukins D. W. Refinement of the structure of B-DNA and implications for the analysis of x-ray diffraction data from fibers of biopolymers. J Mol Biol. 1973 Dec 5;81(2):93–105. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90182-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dickerson R. E., Drew H. R. Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer. II. Influence of base sequence on helix structure. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jul 15;149(4):761–786. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90357-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dougherty A. M., Causley G. C., Johnson W. C., Jr Flow dichroism evidence for tilting of the bases when DNA is in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(8):2193–2195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drew H. R., Dickerson R. E. Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer. III. Geometry of hydration. J Mol Biol. 1981 Sep 25;151(3):535–556. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90009-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drew H. R., Wing R. M., Takano T., Broka C., Tanaka S., Itakura K., Dickerson R. E. Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer: conformation and dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Apr;78(4):2179–2183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.4.2179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fratini A. V., Kopka M. L., Drew H. R., Dickerson R. E. Reversible bending and helix geometry in a B-DNA dodecamer: CGCGAATTBrCGCG. J Biol Chem. 1982 Dec 25;257(24):14686–14707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gulotta M., Goss D. J., Diem M. IR vibrational CD in model deoxyoligonucleotides: observation of the B----Z phase transition and extended coupled oscillator intensity calculations. Biopolymers. 1989 Dec;28(12):2047–2058. doi: 10.1002/bip.360281202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gupta G., Bansal M., Sasisekharan V. Conformational flexibility of DNA: polymorphism and handedness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6486–6490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN). Abbreviations and symbols for the description of conformations of polynucleotide chains. Recommendations 1982. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Mar 1;131(1):9–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07225.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kopka M. L., Fratini A. V., Drew H. R., Dickerson R. E. Ordered water structure around a B-DNA dodecamer. A quantitative study. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jan 5;163(1):129–146. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90033-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lavery R., Sklenar H. Defining the structure of irregular nucleic acids: conventions and principles. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989 Feb;6(4):655–667. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1989.10507728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lavery R., Sklenar H. The definition of generalized helicoidal parameters and of axis curvature for irregular nucleic acids. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1988 Aug;6(1):63–91. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1988.10506483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McClarin J. A., Frederick C. A., Wang B. C., Greene P., Boyer H. W., Grable J., Rosenberg J. M. Structure of the DNA-Eco RI endonuclease recognition complex at 3 A resolution. Science. 1986 Dec 19;234(4783):1526–1541. doi: 10.1126/science.3024321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nilsson L., Clore G. M., Gronenborn A. M., Brünger A. T., Karplus M. Structure refinement of oligonucleotides by molecular dynamics with nuclear Overhauser effect interproton distance restraints: application to 5' d(C-G-T-A-C-G)2. J Mol Biol. 1986 Apr 5;188(3):455–475. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90168-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Patel D. J., Pardi A., Itakura K. DNA conformation, dynamics, and interactions in solution. Science. 1982 May 7;216(4546):581–590. doi: 10.1126/science.6280281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ravishanker G., Swaminathan S., Beveridge D. L., Lavery R., Sklenar H. Conformational and helicoidal analysis of 30 PS of molecular dynamics on the d(CGCGAATTCGCG) double helix: "curves", dials and windows. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989 Feb;6(4):669–699. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1989.10507729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Seibel G. L., Singh U. C., Kollman P. A. A molecular dynamics simulation of double-helical B-DNA including counterions and water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(19):6537–6540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.19.6537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Singh U. C., Weiner S. J., Kollman P. Molecular dynamics simulations of d(C-G-C-G-A) X d(T-C-G-C-G) with and without "hydrated" counterions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Feb;82(3):755–759. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.3.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang Y., Thomas G. A., Peticolas W. L. A duplex of the oligonucleotides d(GGGGGTTTTT) and d(AAAAACCCCC) forms an A to B conformational junction in concentrated salt solutions. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989 Jun;6(6):1177–1187. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1989.10506543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhurkin V. B. Sequence-dependent bending of DNA and phasing of nucleosomes. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1985 Feb;2(4):785–804. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1985.10506324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES