Skip to main content
Drug Delivery logoLink to Drug Delivery
. 2026 Jan 15;33(1):2614585. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2026.2614585

Next-generation composite vesicular systems: an in-depth review of proniosomes in advanced drug delivery

Jagabandhu Bag a,1, Subhankar Mukhopadhyay b,c,1, Gouranga Nandi d, Hein Min Tun b,c,e,*
PMCID: PMC12810413  PMID: 41536226

ABSTRACT

Proniosomes represent an advanced composite vesicular platform that integrates non-ionic surfactants, lipids, and biodegradable carriers to significantly improve drug solubility, stability, and transmembrane delivery. These dry powdery formulations are transformed into multiscale niosomes upon contact with a hydrated medium to achieve controlled release and enhanced drug permeability. This seminal review delineates the transformative potential of proniosomal systems in treating various diseases, detailing diverse routes of administration, formulation techniques, mechanisms of action, as well as their advantages and limitations. Proniosomes address major issues such as systemic toxicity, poor solubility, and erratic absorption while maintaining green chemistry principles owing to their biodegradable constituents. By critically analyzing the potential for industrial translation, this review highlights the knowledge gap on clinical studies, scalability, and regulatory issues. The translation potential has even been further enhanced by recent developments in bioconjugation and nanotechnology, such as ligand-anchored proniosomes that enable active targeting. The topic's relevance is evident, as proniosomes complement next-generation biotechnology tools, such as mRNA delivery, while offering a sustainable alternative to liposomes. By compiling the most recent data, this review strives to catalyze innovation in novel drug delivery, making it essential for researchers and pharmaceutical developers.

KEYWORDS: Proniosomes, composite vesicular systems, niosomes, controlled release, sustainable pharmaceutics, novel drug delivery

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

graphic file with name IDRD_A_2614585_UF0001_C.jpg

Transformation of proniosome to noisome and their diverse applications in drug delivery. This image was designed with BioRender (https://biorender.com/).

1. Introduction

Vesicular drug encapsulation represents a pivotal advancement in targeted therapeutics, optimizing site-specific delivery while minimizing systemic toxicity (Abd El-Alim et al. 2014; Kapoor et al. 2019). This necessity has directed the synthesis of many vesicular drug delivery systems, such as liposomes and niosomes, and provesicular systems, such as proliposomes and proniosomes. Liposomes have colloidal, vesicular structures with an aqueous core and concentric lipidic bilayers that are arranged with various types of surfactants and drugs (Shubhra 2024). Its oral administration is impeded by physicochemical stability issues such as fusion, hydrolysis, and oxidation (Yasam et al. 2014). This catalytic challenge spurred the invention of proliposomes, a fundamental provesicular system designed to address the aqueous stability issues of conventional liposomes (Payne et al. 1986). However, their reliance on phospholipids limits both their cost-effectiveness and biocompatibility. Based on this foundational concept, proniosomes emerged as a superior and more versatile provesicular system by substituting phospholipids with a wider range of tunable non-ionic surfactants (Khatoon et al. 2017).

Proniosomes are dry, freely flowable composite powder products that, when reconstituted with water, form multi-lamellar niosomal structures (Sachan et al. 2021). They have gained popularity as drug transporters and drug-targeting agents since the 1980s to bypass the limitations of liposomes and niosomes (Khatoon et al. 2017). Proniosomes outperform liposomes and niosomes as potential drug carriers because of their greater chemical stability and lower toxicity, along with efficient entrapment of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs (Hu and Rhodes 1999; Khatoon et al. 2017). As a dry product, proniosomes avoid physical stability issues such as leakage, fusion, and aggregation, enhancing their transport, distribution, packaging, and storage (Chen et al. 2019; Shah et al. 2021). A comparative evaluation of vesicular drug delivery systems is detailed in Table 1. While transferosomes and ethosomes offer better skin penetration, proniosomes offer superior overall functionality. Their evolutionary leap from passive dry powdery carriers to stable, stimuli-responsive compositional-functional composite platforms with exceptional versatility across multiple routes (oral, topical, parenteral, pulmonary etc.) position them as next-generation drug delivery vehicles, overcoming the rigidity and shelf-life limitations inherent in conventional liposomes and niosomes. Proniosomes can be readily converted into unit dosage forms, which enormously adds to their utility and potential for large-scale industrial manufacturing (Ahmad et al. 2017).

Table 1.

Comparative evaluation of vesicular drug delivery systems: proniosomes, niosomes, liposomes, transferosomes, and ethosomes.

Characters Proniosomes Niosomes Liposomes Transferosomes Ethosomes References
Composition Non-ionic surfactants, cholesterol, and carriers Phospholipids, cholesterol, and non-ionic surfactants Phospholipids and cholesterol Phospholipids and edge activators Phospholipids and ethanol (Liga et al. 2024; Mishra and Thakur, 2024 ; Watmode et al. 2024; Matharoo et al. 2024; Mahajan et al. 2024)
Characteristics Microscopic and solid colloidal particles Lipid and microscopic nanoparticles Microscopic lipid vesicles Ultra-flexible vesicles Elastic vesicles (Liga et al. 2024; Mishra and Thakur, 2024 ; Watmode et al. 2024; Matharoo et al. 2024; Mahajan et al. 2024)
Flexibility Physically stable and rigid Rigid and elastic Rigid High deformability due to surfactant Elasticity due to ethanol (Watmode et al. 2024; Matharoo et al. 2024; Yadav et al. 2024; Bhatia et al. 2024)
Extent of skin penetration High permeation Moderate penetration Very less penetration Can easily penetrate Can easily penetrate (Kumari et al. 2014; Matharoo et al. 2024; Mahajan et al. 2024; Trucillo et al. 2024; Jaradat et al. 2024)
Route of administration Oral, parenteral, topical, transdermal, vaginal, pulmonary, intranasal, mucosal, ocular Oral, parenteral, topical, transdermal, pulmonary, intranasal, ocular Oral, parenteral, topical, transdermal Topical and transdermal Topical and transdermal (Sakdiset et al. 2023; Moammeri et al. 2023; Li et al., 2023 ; Jafari et al. 2023; Matharoo et al. 2024)
Marketed products Ketorolac gel, Risperidone,Losartan potassium, Chlorpheniraminem maleate (CPM) Minoxidil transdermal gel, Atorvastatin Calcium Nanovesicular gel Ambisone, Daunoxome Transferosomes ® (Idea AG) Nanominox, Decorin cream (Rajan et al. 2011; Maniyar et al. 2022; Saxena et al. 2023; Izhar et al. 2023)

This review provides an overview of current knowledge on proniosomes by critically dissecting their identity as engineered composite systems and elucidating how strategic integration of polymers, ligands, and other functional excipients transforms them beyond mere niosome precursors. We also provide a thorough scholarly resource by combining mechanisms, formulation techniques, administration routes, and therapeutic uses. Furthermore, we address translational hurdles by assessing the clinical trials, the patent environment, regulatory concerns, and ongoing restrictions to develop a strategic roadmap for realizing proniosomes as transformative, cutting-edge drug delivery tool.

2. Mechanistic insights into proniosomal drug delivery

Proniosomes are the inactive form of niosomes; after hydration, they transform to the active niosomal form. There are two ways of hydration: first, through direct moisture uptake by the skin, and second, in the presence of solvents such as water and buffer solutions. These composite biomaterials encapsulate the drug in their hierarchical structure, shielding it from external conditions and enabling controlled release triggered by environmental factors such as temperature or pH. They can also transport drugs to specific sites in the body, such as cancer cells and inflamed tissues (Khatoon et al. 2017; Shehata et al. 2021). Figure 1 illustrates the drug delivery mechanism of proniosomes, including their hydration-triggered conversion to niosomes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mechanism of proniosomes behind drug delivery. This image was created with BioRender (https://biorender.com/).

Key physicochemical parameters, primarily the surfactant's chemical structure and hydrophilic‒lipophilic balance (HLB), control the effective transformation of proniosomes into multiscale functional niosomes (Kumar and Rajeshwarrao 2011; Ahmed et al. 2025). Additionally, the molar ratio of surfactant to cholesterol significantly influences bilayer integrity and stability. The hydration conditions are equally critical, as the process must exceed the surfactant's phase transition temperature (Tc) to enable sufficient molecular mobility for spontaneous self-assembly into vesicles (Kumar and Rajeshwarrao 2011). The vesicle size, polydispersity, and drug entrapment efficiency are directly governed by hydration parameters, including the agitation method, duration, and aqueous medium properties, such as pH, ionic strength, etc. (Alsarra et al. 2005). Stable and effective proniosomal-turned niosomal dispersions require careful regulation of these factors. Table 2 presents proniosomes as a revolutionary platform that exhibits unmatched adaptability for a wide range of medicinal uses, from transdermal antipsychotics to oral antibiotics. Improved medication penetration, prolonged release, and decreased toxicity are made possible by their special compositions (surfactant/cholesterol matrices). Notably, proniosomes are the next frontier in precision nanomedicine since they outperform traditional administration in terms of bioavailability (such as atenolol's 365-fold increase in area under the curve (AUC) and targeted action (ocular pressure management).

Table 2.

Systematic compilation of proniosomal formulations detailing their therapeutic applications, compositions, and formulation advantages.

Drug Purpose of administration Route of administration Composition Advantages References
Cephradrine Respiratory infections Oral Sorbitol/maltodextrin/span 60/cholesterol Enhanced antibacterial effect with controlled release property. Saim et al. (2022)
Flurbiprofen Osteoarthritis Oral Brij 35/cholesterol Increase in percutaneous permeation. Kumar and Jain, 2016
Fluticasone propionate Corticosteroid Oral Xanthum gum/sodium alginate Reduced systemic adverse effects and prolonged duration of action. Ahmed et al. (2021)
Itraconazole Antifungal Oral Mannitol/maltodextrin Reduced side effects. Ismail and Khattab (2018)
Tizanidine Hydrochloride Anti-spastic Oral Cholesterol/span 40/span 60 Enhancement of anti-nociceptive effect. Mohsen et al. (2023)
Fluconazole Antifungal Oral Span20/soya lecithin/ethanol Maximum drug release and permeability. Salam et al. (2021)
Aceclofenac Pain and inflammation Oral Span 60/orabase gel Enhanced permeation and prolonged drug release for oro-dental conditions. Khindri et al. (2015)
Letrozole Aromatase inhibitor Parenteral Sorbital/sucrose/ethanol Enhanced drug dissolution. Khudair et al. (2020)
Flurbiprofen Osteoarthritis Parenteral Span 80: Span 20/sorbitol/cholesterol long-lasting anti-inflammatory effect and a decrease in dosage frequency. Kumar and Jain, 2016
Levoflaxacin Reduce bacterial infections Dermal Span 20/lecithin/cholesterol Better drug entrapment efficiency. Salam et al. (2021)
5-Fluorouracil Antimetabolite drug Dermal Soya lecithin/span 20 Penetration enhancement. Jampala and Gadela (2021)
Curcumin Anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory Dermal Cholesterol/surfactants Greater penetration and effectiveness. Akbari et al. (2020)
Rutin Reduce arthritis pain Dermal Span 60/cholesterol/soy lecithin/ethanol Reduced toxic effects. Pinzaru et al. (2021)
Cilostazol Reduce leg pain Transdermal Span 60/cholesterol Potential delivery across the skin. Nemr et al. (2021)
Lornoxicam Analgesic and anti-inflammatory Transdermal Lutrol F68/cholesterol/lecithin Better efficacy. Vijaya et al. (2018)
Risperidone Schizophrenia Transdermal Surfactants/soya lecithin/cholesterol Improvement in the mean residence time ensures prolonged blood circulation. Sambhakar et al. (2017)
Atenolol Treat hypertension Transdermal Soya lecithin/ethanol Increased percentage of AUC by 365.38-fold. Ramkanth et al. (2018)
Tramadol Severe pain Transdermal Soya lecithin/cholesterol/HPMC Improvement of antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects. Shah et al. (2020)
Brimonidine tartrate Reduction of intraocular pressure Ocular L-a-phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol/brij 52 Enhancement of drug release rate and greater bioavailability. Emad Eldeeb et al. (2019)
Dorzolamide-HCl Intraocular pressure reduction Ocular L-a-lecithin/span 40/cholesterol Reduce intraocular pressure more effectively than normal formulations. Fouda et al. (2018)
Voriconazole Fungal or yeast infections Ocular HPMC/carbopol 940 Sustained release property. El-Emam et al. (2020)
Sildenafil/Vardenafil/Tadalafil Erectile dysfunction Topical penile therapy Span/lecithin/cholesterol Enhancement of sexual activities. Mohamed et al. (2023)
Vismodegib Metastatic basal cell carcinoma Pulmonary Span/lactose/mannitol Better drug deposition, cytotoxic activity, and effective bioavailability. Gamal et al. (2020)
Gemifloxacin Pneumonia Pulmonary Span 60/tween 60/poloxamer 407/brij 58/cholesterol PB High antibacterial activity. El-Emam et al. (2023)

3. The architectural blueprint of proniosomes: types and composite nature

Proniosomes' formulation design directly contributes to their structural and functional versatility. A deeper understanding arises from recognizing their inherent identity as constructed composite systems, although they can be conventionally classified according to their physical appearance and the size of the vesicles they generate upon hydration. Their capacity for sophisticated functional assembly, as well as their structural makeup, gives them a multifaceted composite character.

3.1. Conventional classification based on vesicular morphology

Proniosomes are traditionally classed based on the morphology of the niosomes generated during hydration, which is ultimately regulated by formulation composition and processing settings (Kakar et al. 2010; Khindri et al. 2015; Reddy and Gandla 2022). Small unilamellar proniosomes (SUPs) are dry, free-flowing particles containing non-ionic surfactants such as Span 60 or Tween 80, cholesterol, and other stabilizers, with a size range between 25 and 100 nm. Sonication or microfluidization methods are mostly used to develop SUPs that promote high drug encapsulation efficiency, controlled release, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Large unilamellar proniosomes (LUPs; size 100–1000 nm) are dry powder composition prepared of non-ionic surfactants, cholesterol, and other additives. LUPs are developed using ether injection or reversed-phase evaporation, resulting in vesicles with a large aqueous core ideal for hydrophilic payloads and a lipid bilayer that can hold hydrophobic drugs. Dry granular proniosomes (DGPs) are a widely investigated class of proniosomal systems. These free-flowing powders are composed of non-ionic surfactants, cholesterol, and other excipients. They are typically produced by freeze-drying, which removes the water content and leaves a dry, granular material. Upon simple hydration, the amphiphilic block copolymers spontaneously organize into vesicular structures with a lipid bilayer arrangement. The hydrophilic drugs are then encapsulated in the aqueous core and the hydrophobic drugs are entrapped in the lipid layers. DGPs have longer shelf-life than liquid proniosomes. Dry granular proniosomes are of two types:

Sorbitol-based proniosomes: Sorbitol-based proniosomes are stable, efficient, and versatile drug delivery systems, with sorbitol serving as a key excipient to stabilize this vesicle. This system offers the advantages of improved stability, easy storage, and controlled drug release upon rehydration.

Maltodextrin-based proniosomes: These are one of the specific types of dry powders that employ maltodextrin polysaccharide along with non-ionic surfactants, cholesterol, and stabilizers. Proniosomes require a filler, which is maltodextrin in this case, to keep the powdery proniosomes intact when stored and offer superior characteristics, such as greater stability and integrated drug release.

3.2. Proniosomes as engineered composite delivery systems

A proniosome is a solid-phase composite matrix in which the active pharmaceutical ingredient is distributed inside a precisely tailored blend of components (e.g. surfactant, lipid, and carrier matrices), each of which plays an important role in determining the performance of the final system (Khatoon et al. 2017). In addition to their intrinsic structural and compositional complexity, the next-generation potential of proniosomes is unlocked through advanced functional compositing, which involves strategically engineered integrations that evolve them from simple drug reservoirs to active and adaptive delivery platforms. This transformation is driven by ligand-anchored targeting, where the surface functionalization of derived niosomes with targeting ligands (e.g. folic acid, peptides, and antibodies) creates drug carrier-targeting triads, enabling active drug delivery, enhanced therapeutic efficacy, and a significant reduction in off-target toxicity. Further sophistication is achieved by polymer-hybrid engineering, where the integration of biopolymers such as chitosan (Khatoon et al. 2019), carbopol (Mohmed and Ahmed 2016), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (Shah et al. 2020), or maltodextrin (Sahoo et al. 2014) yield mucoadhesive hybrid vesicles with prolonged mucosal retention at mucosal surfaces, or by stimuli-responsive ‘smart’ composites that trigger payload release via pH, temperature, or redox cues at pathological sites (Khatoon et al. 2017; Darson et al. 2023). Emerging research should focus on developing hybrid lipid‒polymer proniosomes that synergize lipid biocompatibility with polymeric mechanical resilience and controlled release kinetics to create systems with exceptional robustness and tunability (Gajbhiye et al. 2023). These engineered composite strategies endorse their position as a next-generation system, providing a varied and powerful toolkit to address the various issues of current drug delivery.

4. Fabrication strategies: from conventional techniques to next-generation manufacturing

The fabrication of proniosomes relies on a series of well-established engineering techniques that convert surfactants, lipids, and carrier matrices into stable, free-flowing dry powders. Conventional approaches (as illustrated in Figure 2) are well established and offer a fundamental understanding of proniosome biofabrication. The slurry method utilizes a flask with a circular base to make the slurry with a particular volume of organic solvent, lipid carriers, and surfactants, followed by vacuum-drying to form free-flowing proniosomal powder. The obtained product needs to be placed in a sealed container in a refrigerator at 4 °C to minimize contamination and product degradation (Khudair et al. 2020; Shruthi et al. 2020). Coacervation phase separation is another widely applicable technique for the preparation of proniosomes. In this method, weighed ingredients are placed into a wide-mouthed glass beaker with surfactants and lipid carriers, followed by the addition of an organic solvent. Next, the ingredients are well mixed and heated over a water bath at 60–70 °C until the surfactants are dissolved properly. During the process, precautions must be taken to prevent solvent loss due to evaporation. The mixture should remain in a water bath at a steady temperature while the aqueous phase is added. In the end, the resulting solution is cooled to form proniosomes (Emad Eldeeb et al. 2019; Tareen et al. 2020; Aboumanei and Mahmoud 2020). Furthermore, the spray-coating method involves spraying an organic solvent-based surfactant solution over carrier/coating materials, followed by solvent evaporation to develop a proniosomal formulation. The surfactant creates a thin layer on the carrier materials, which is then hydrated and forms multi-lamellar vesicles (Radha et al. 2013; Mittal et al. 2020).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Schematic representation summarizing the fundamental preparation processes for proniosome production: (A) slurry method, (B) coacervation phase separation technique, and (C) spray coating method. This image was generated with BioRender (https://biorender.com/).

While traditional methods remain the foundation of laboratory-scale proniosomal development, next-generation fabrication approaches promise greater precision, scalability, reproducibility, and environmental sustainability. For instance, adopting microfluidics technology to rapidly mix precursors at the microscale provides superior control over vesicle size and dispersity (Shepherd et al. 2021; Obeid et al. 2022). Meanwhile, supercritical fluid (SCF) technology, which primarily uses carbon dioxide (CO2) as a SCF, presents a potential, solvent-free alternative that overcomes the challenges of residual organic solvents, thereby simplifying downstream processing and improving safety profiles (Falconer et al. 2015; William et al. 2020). Integrating a more holistic quality-by-design (QbD) approach and high-throughput screening will also be crucial, allowing for the systematic optimization of critical formulation and process parameters (Zagalo et al. 2022). Ultimately, this data-driven method is pivotal for developing industrially viable and regulatory-compliant technologies that will elevate proniosomes from a potential breakthrough to a therapeutically translatable, next-generation platform.

5. Physicochemical profiling of proniosomes

Extensive physicochemical characterizations are required to ascertain the quality and forecast the in-vivo effectiveness of niosomes derived from proniosomes. After hydration, the resulting vesicles are subjected to analysis to observe vesicle morphology, size, and lamellarity using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Verma et al. 2016). Dynamic light scattering (DLS), which yields vital information on vesicle homogeneity and colloidal stability, is used to quantify particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential (Shruthi et al. 2021). The entrapment efficiency (%EE), a critical performance parameter, is measured to determine the quantity of drug that is successfully encapsulated. This is typically accomplished by centrifuging the unentrapped drug and analyzing the supernatant (Kapil et al. 2012). In addition, in-vitro drug release profile can be evaluated by using various techniques, such as the dialysis method, to determine the drug release kinetics (Verma et al. 2016). To examine drug‒excipient interactions and validate the amorphous dispersion of the drug within the carrier, solid-state characterization of the dry proniosomes powder is also carried out using methods such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffraction (X-RD). The funnel and cylinder methods are used to measure the angle of repose (θ) (Mishra et al. 2011). Proniosomal powder flows from a height of 10  cm to create a cone in both directions, and the angle is determined using the formula:

θ=Tan1×hr

Here, ‘r’ is the base radius and ‘h’ is the cone height.

In addition, the safety and storage stability of the formulation are also evaluated (Verma et al. 2016; Ramkanth et al. 2018). Collectively, these studies establish a robust physicochemical profile, ensuring that the formulation is suitable for its intended role as a drug delivery system.

6. Proniosomes: a versatile drug delivery platform

Proniosomes are flexible drug delivery systems that can be administered in a variety of ways. Their particular uses in the controlled and targeted delivery of drugs will now be covered in depth in the section below.

6.1. Oral delivery

Oral drug delivery has been the prime mode of drug administration since the beginning of the medical era (Jain 2008). However, it has been associated with several pitfalls. Drugs that are unstable in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, undergo degradation by enzymatic or acidic reactions, exhibit minimal permeability through the intestinal epithelium, or undergo extensive first-pass metabolism must be delivered in special dosage forms (Kaur et al. 2019). To negotiate the gastro-intestinal barrier, drugs need to be present in a dissolved form (Florence and Attwood 1998). This requirement gives rise to a variety of nanocarriers, such as liposomes (Caddeo et al. 2017), niosomes (Khan et al. 2016), lipid nanoparticles (Kraft et al. 2014), micelles (Chen et al. 2013), gold nanoparticles (Chen et al. 2014), quantum dots (Chen et al. 2014), and proniosomes (Mittal et al. 2020). A number of investigations show that oral proniosomal powders can improve the solubility and bioavailability of poorly soluble medications (Nasr 2010). Song et al. developed a free-flowing and stable proniosomal formulation of vinpocetine, a neurological drug with poor solubility, to improve its oral bioavailability and GI absorption. According to the results, vinpocetine-loaded proniosomes showed higher (up to 4.9-fold) bioavailability compared to the free drug (Song et al. 2015). The authors opined that, on reaching the GI lumen, proniosomes are transformed into niosomes by hydration, which is followed by endocytosis. Second, niosomes enter the lymphatic system, which helps them to avoid the first-pass effect and improves their bioavailability. In another study, nateglinide, an anti-diabetic medicine, was encapsulated in proniosomes to increase its oral bioavailability and absorption. They reported significantly higher (32%) plasma concentrations of nateglinide in rabbits compared to the pure drug (Sahoo et al. 2014). Similar to these findings, in a rat pharmacokinetic study, an optimized proniosomal formulation enhanced the oral bioavailability of lipophilic irbesartan by 2-fold over a pure drug suspension (Mujtaba et al. 2024).

These findings established proniosomes’ superiority in oral delivery of poorly hydrophilic drugs compared to others (Khatoon et al. 2017). Another group developed a proniosomal carrier system utilizing various types of molecules, including spans, cholesterol, and maltodextrin (Gad et al. 2014). The system was used to entrap a combination of two drugs, metronidazole and doxycycline hydrochloride. Both medicines were successfully incorporated into the proniosomal structure without any chemical interactions with other substances. The proniosomal powder remained stable for 3 months at 2–8 °C and exhibited free-flowing characteristics. The dry powder was easy to handle, permitted accurate dosing, and resulted in better patient compliance (Gad et al. 2014). While the preparation of proniosomes is easy and has the potential to positively impact drug delivery, there is concern about their large-scale manufacturing (Yuksel et al. 2016). During mass production, the intricate arrangement of the drug and excipient systems can be completely changed and may revert to conventional dosage forms. Hence, the preparation of oral proniosomal tablets should require proper coating, which might increase production costs (Khatoon et al. 2017).

6.2. Parenteral delivery

Drug administration through the parenteral route is a generic strategy typically used for pharmacological components with a restricted therapeutic index and low bioavailability. It is also useful for patients who suffer from swallowing problems, delayed gastric emptying, intestinal motility, vomiting, or are unconscious (Nkanga et al. 2020). In emergencies, when the oral route is not recommended for practical considerations, it is used to provide instant relief. However, this almost ideal system also has several significant drawbacks, including the need for skilled manpower, a rapid decrease in systemic concentration, and frequent administration. One of these drawbacks can be overcome by using biodegradable polymeric nanosystems, which can sustain drug release for an extended period and help in reducing the frequency of dosing and minimizing hazardous side effects (Kim et al. 2023; Din et al. 2017a; Din et al. 2017b).

Sterilization is an essential requirement for parenteral dosage forms. Though a variety of methods are available for these, each has drawbacks of its own. The use of cryoprotectants during freeze drying and sterilization by gamma-irradiation can cause significant physiological changes, especially in terms of particle size and drug release rate (Bozdag et al. 2005). However, proniosomal formulations are devoid of these problems. They can be quickly sterilized, reconstituted with a little agitation, and maintained without any changes in particle size or drug release rate (Nasr 2010). Moreover, proniosomes can be easily divided into unit dosage forms for parenteral administration and remain stable during storage and transportation (Verma et al. 2016). A recent study has shown that the anti-inflammatory properties of flubiprofen can be improved by formulating them into proniosomes. The formulation could maintain the systemic concentration of the drug for a prolonged period of time (3 days), which reduced its frequency of dosing (Verma et al. 2016). In short, proniosomes are stable, accessible, beneficial, and promising advanced substitute for current vesicular and colloidal drug delivery systems with the potential to transform parenteral drug delivery.

6.3. Topical and transdermal delivery

Human skin, a selective barrier that prevents the penetration of unwanted substances while maintaining hydration, has emerged as a promising route for systemic drug delivery (Fukushima et al. 2011). The route has many benefits, among which non-invasiveness and avoiding first-pass metabolism are prime. Drugs prone to GI degradation or difficult to regulate a steady-state plasma concentration are ideal candidates for this delivery route (Kováčik et al. 2020; Ramadon et al. 2022). However, limited drug permeation through the complex structure of the stratum corneum remains an important backdrop. Over the past decade, studies have shown that vesicular drug delivery systems effectively overcome shortcomings in dermal and transdermal administration (Chacko et al. 2020; Witika et al. 2021). There are many types of vesicular systems investigated for topical and transdermal administration, including liposomes, noisomes, and proniosomes (Muzzalupo 2016). Among these, proniosomes offer a unique advantage because of their adherence to the stratum corneum, convert into niosomes when moistened, and subsequently increase skin penetration through the stratum corneum (Shah et al. 2021). These vesicular carriers serve as drug reservoirs in addition to their tunable surface drug release properties (Kamel et al. 2013).

Numerous studies have been carried out to optimize the composition of the constituent molecules of pronisomes (non-ionic surfactants, cholesterol, phospholipids, etc.) that favor the permeation of drugs through the complex structure of the skin. An experiment that evaluated the effectiveness of drug penetration and entrapment of flubiprofen in proniosomes has shown that the optimized batch (maximum amount of nonionic surfactant and minimum amount of cholesterol) of proniosomes had high drug entrapment (39.45%) efficiency and skin permeability (Zidan and Mokhtar 2011). Mehta et al. reported that boswellic acid, a poor bioavailability drug, has improved its absorption (98.52%), release rate (84.83 ± 0.153 mg/cm2 in 24 h), and bioavailability when loaded in a proniosomal gel. In a compositional study, boswellic acid-loaded proniosomal gels containing leukotriene inhibitors showed remarkable (p <0.001) anti-inflammatory properties compared with the marketed voveran gels (Mehta et al. 2016). Similarly, in the treatment of overactive bladder, transdermal administration of tolterodine tartrate proniosomes resulted in better therapeutic efficacy and high drug permeability (35%–42%), while their oral formulation showed many adverse effects (Rajabalaya et al. 2016). An added advantage of transdermal proniosomes is that they can be used in patches, films, and gel carriers to provide bioadhesive properties to improve skin contact using cost-effective raw materials (Khatoon et al. 2017).

6.4. Ocular delivery

In general, low bioavailability is a common issue with ocular dosage forms due to the blinking reflex, low eye capacity, nasolacrimal drainage, and resistance offered by the corneal and conjunctival epithelial barriers. These factors reduce the retention time of drug molecules in the eyes, leading to their limited absorption (Kaur et al. 2012). Therefore, in order to achieve the desired level of therapeutic effectiveness, conventional eye formulations need to be deposited multiple times (Luo et al. 2011), which often leads to patient noncompliance. Several novel ocular drug delivery systems, such as in-situ gels (Gupta et al. 2015), liposomes (Dai et al. 2013), in-situ nanosuspensions (Luschmann et al. 2013), nanoparticles (Nagarwal et al. 2012), nanoemulsions (Garg et al. 2013), and proniosomes (Abdelkader et al. 2012) have been developed to overcome this difficulty. Among these, proniosomes are believed to be most suitable for ocular delivery. Ketoconazole-loaded proniosomal gel increased the bioavailability (up to 20-fold) of the drug in the eyes by prolonging their contact time in the corneal cavity, providing prolonged and sustained action at specific sites and preventing enzymatic metabolism by tears (Abdelbary et al. 2017). This finding aligns with the study by Li et al., in which they produced a tacrolimus-loaded proniosomal formulation. The developed formulation was targeted into rabbit’s cornea, where proniosomes were converted into niosomes in the presence of an aqueous phase and showed better permeability and greater retention time compared to conventional ointments (Li et al. 2014). In a corneal xenograft transplantation model using Sprague-Dawley rats, tacrolimus-loaded proniosomes significantly retarded corneal allograft rejection and sustained retention time (13.86 ± 0.80 days) compared to cyclosporine eye drops (Li et al. 2014).

6.5. Vaginal delivery

Traditionally, the vaginal route is used to treat local microbial infections, mainly vulvovaginal candidiasis and bacterial vaginosis (Lin et al. 2021). Recently, its potential as a drug delivery port for other medicines, such as antimicrobials, antimycotics, sex hormones, and peptides, has been recognized (Ensign et al. 2014). Vagina has a unique set of pearls and perils. On the plus side, it has a rich blood supply, which drains into the inferior vena cava through the iliac veins, bypassing first-pass metabolism as well as good permeability. On the negative side, it has significant idiosyncrasies that result in variances in the bioavailability of many drugs. Several physiological and non-physiological factors, such as menstruation or menopause, sexual activity, and personal cleanliness, may alter the bioavailability of vaginally administered drugs (Vanić and Škalko-Basnet 2013; Yang et al. 2013). The natural clearing process through vaginal mucus secretion also limits many drug molecules from their proper administration at the specific site of action (das Neves et al. 2011). The bioavailability of the vaginal systems is often compromised by leakage and the short residence time of the dosage form. Hence, the focus has shifted to the development of novel formulations with good retention, release, and diffusion properties. Different micro and nano innovative delivery techniques, such as hydrogel (Khade et al. 2014), vaginal sponges (Furst et al. 2015), nanoparticles (Meng et al. 2011), nanocapsules (Santos 2013), solid‒lipid nanoparticles (Alukda et al. 2011), niosomes (Ning et al. 2005), and liposomes (Palac et al. 2014), have been investigated. Many of these studies focused on exploiting mucoadhesive properties, as they play a crucial role in keeping the dosage form in close contact with the vaginal mucosa (de Araújo Pereira and Bruschi 2012). Among vaginal dosage forms, including tablets, solutions, foams, suppositories, and inserts, semisolid dosage forms, particularly gels enjoy the maximum popularity (Neves et al. 2014). Proniosomal gel systems, owing to their strong mucoadhesive properties, hold significant potential as effective carriers for vaginal drug administration. Abdou et al. developed proniosomes of the antifungal drug terconazole to treat vaginitis (Mohmed and Ahmed 2016). It is converted to niosomes upon contact with the vaginal aqueous medium. Microbiological assessment indicated the prolongation of residence time (3 h) of the drug in the vagina, leading to better therapeutic outcomes (Mohmed and Ahmed 2016).

6.6. Pulmonary delivery

The lungs have garnered attention as a drug delivery route, given their role as the primary organs affected by various serious respiratory diseases (Misra et al. 2011). Its importance has recently increased manifold as it has been recognized as an excellent gateway for the systemic administration of drugs. With an enormous surface area (>100 m2) and thin epithelial layers specifically designed for gaseous exchange, the lungs can absorb drug molecules more effectively than most other absorption sites (Nasr 2010). The double blood supply of the lungs is also a significant advantage. Pulmonary-delivered drugs enter systemic circulation directly via the pulmonary veins into the left atrium, completely bypassing first-pass hepatic metabolism. The application of nanotechnology, as well as portable inhalers, makes this method even more convenient for patients (Zhou et al. 2014; Kuzmov and Minko 2015). As a result, for both local and systemic effects, the lungs can be used as the most effective drug delivery route.

Proniosomal drug delivery systems with various types of nasal nebulizers were successfully developed by Elhissi et al. (2013). Beclomethasonedipropionate (BDP) was used as a model drug. Following pulmonary delivery, proniosomes were converted into niosomes, exposing the intrinsic characteristics of aerosols. The findings revealed that proniosomes had a greater level of BDP entrapment (35.4%) than conventional niosomal dosage (27.5%) forms. Additionally, the developed aerosols from the nebulizer systems were able to yield large amounts of drug molecules with a high fine particle fraction (FPF) (Elhissi et al. 2013). In a different study, Abd-Elbary et al. used the nonionic, biocompatible, and biodegradable surfactant ‘sucrose stearate’ to design a controlled-release nebulizable delivery system for cromolyn sodium-loaded proniosomes. The findings demonstrated that proniosomes quickly hydrated (within 2 min) and effectively absorbed through the pulmonary circulation and showed better therapeutic efficacy (Abd-Elbary et al. 2008).

6.7. Intranasal delivery

Drug delivery through the intranasal route is a potentially non-invasive technique to avoid the blood‒brain barrier (BBB) and deliver medicines directly to the central nervous system (CNS). The nasal mucosa, with its olfactory receptor neurons, trigeminal nasal pathways, nasal lymphatic, and porous endothelium, can directly transport the drugs to the CNS (Bors and Erdő 2019). Many therapeutic components are administered to the CNS through the intranasal route (Misra et al. 2016). Moreover, this route allows self-administration and is cost-effective in nature (Bhatt et al. 2015). Despite its advantages, the nasal route presents limitations, including enzymatic degradation, mucosal irritation, potential tissue damage from chronic use, and rapid mucociliary clearance, which collectively constrain its therapeutic utility (Ali et al. 2010). Drug delivery through nanosized carriers (1–100 nm) that can easily cross the brain endothelium membrane can minimize these drawbacks. Nanocarriers can also prevent the enzymatic breakdown of drug molecules and prevent them from harsh environments, improving their bioavailability and cellular absorption (Alsarra et al. 2010; Gurrapu et al. 2012). Proniosomes are promising vesicular drug delivery systems that can deliver both small and large therapeutic agents effectively through the intranasal route to the CNS (Alsarra et al. 2010). Khatoon et al. showed that the unique vesicular structure of proniosomal gels enhanced duloxetine absorption. Their ex-vivo and in-vivo studies have demonstrated that a mucoadhesive proniosomal gel of an antidepressant drug, duloxetine, for intranasal delivery offers promising effects, with extended intranasal retention (54% release over 8 h), enhancing bioavailability and significantly (p <0.005) improving transmucosal permeation (Khatoon et al. 2019).

7. Therapeutic applications of proniosomes

Proniosomes have been effectively used in a variety of therapeutic domains by harnessing their special delivery benefits. The following section will detail their specific applications, including cardiac, diabetic, and hormonal therapy, as well as in gene, peptide, and hemoglobin delivery.

7.1. Application in cardiology

In cardiology, proniosomal drug delivery systems present a potential strategy, especially for improving the bioavailability of drugs such as statins. This technique increases the solubility and stability of pharmaceuticals by encasing them in a proniosomal formulation, which becomes niosomes upon hydration, such as atorvastatin, a medicine based on this mechanism, which is used to prevent heart attacks and strokes. Better absorption and controlled release may result from this tailored distribution, which will ultimately reduces adverse effects and increases patient compliance. Proniosome utilization is a noteworthy development in the efficient treatment of cardiovascular illnesses (Eltellawy et al. 2021). Many studies have shown that the proniosomal system prolongs entrapment efficiency and drug release time into the body. To this end, transdermal delivery of captopril-loaded proniosomes has achieved high encapsulation efficiency (66.7%–68.7%) and sustained release kinetics in hypertensive models (Gupta et al. 2007). Lisinopril dihydrate, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, is another example of a proniosomal drug delivery used in cardiology. Lisinopril was encapsulated in a proniosomal gel comprising cholesterol and non-ionic surfactants, which allowed the medication to hydrolyze and form niosomes (Ahmad et al. 2011). This method improves the drug's solubility and stability, which helps to enhance GI tract absorption effectively. A controlled release of lisinopril sustained therapeutic levels over an extended period of time (24 h) and improved blood pressure and minimized adverse effects (Ahmad et al. 2011).

7.2. Application in diabetes

Drug delivery based on this unique strategy shows several advantages for the management of diabetes. The glibenclamide proniosomal formulation enhanced the solubility of the drug and represents better oral bioavailability. A study assessed that blood glucose levels decreased by approximately 73%, and the formulation was stable compared to other conventional dosage forms (Alshora et al. 2023). Another study established some valuable results for amitriptyline and liraglutide-containing proniosomal formulations to control diabetic neuropathy. It significantly controlled blood glucose level and reduced neuropathic pain, oxidative stress, and inflammation as compared to the oral and subcutaneous administration of amitriptyline and liraglutide. The therapeutic efficacy was greater with minimizing side effects (Eissa et al. 2023). Metformin is another example of proniosomal drug delivery in diabetes. This novel formulation plays a vital role in minimizing GI side effects, increasing solubility and bioavailability, and enabling regulated release, which eventually improves patient adherence in diabetic drug delivery (Loona et al. 2012). Sahoo et al. performed another study on maltodextrin-based proniosomes of nateglinide to reveal their bioavailability in a controlled manner by using a rabbit model. In their study, an HPLC method with photodiode array detection was developed to validate the nateglinide concentration in plasma. As per the findings, rapid release was converted to controlled release with a good retention time (8.72 min), and showed more effective bioavailability (Sahoo et al. 2014).

On the other hand, glibenclamide-loaded proniosomal gel was developed to protect testicular tissue from hyperglycemia fluctuation and ROS. These results indicate that this formulation could reduce oxidative stress in testicular tissues by upregulating anti-ROS enzymes and increasing insulin production (Alyami et al. 2024).

7.3. Application in hormonal therapy

Over the past few decades, various studies have highlighted the current value of proniosomes in hormonal therapy for managing both serious and non-serious health conditions in the human body. Proniosome-based levonorgestrel therapy was introduced for in-vitro and in-vivo assessment to assess its efficacy in emergency medical conditions. These findings discovered a higher entrapment efficiency of the drug, which showed better permeability, good therapeutic effectiveness, with minimized side effects (Vora et al. 1998). Another study demonstrated by development and evaluation of letrozole-based proniosomes. They reported that the formulation had controlled drug release and increased drug entrapment efficiency (~74%) with an effective therapeutic index compared to other dosage form for the treatment of breast cancer (Khudair et al. 2020).

A formulation of proniosomal estradiol showed improved transdermal delivery, near-quantitative drug encapsulation (~100%), and increased bioavailability post hydration. A significant improvement over conventional delivery techniques, this vesicular system allows for regulated hormone release, reduces systemic side effects and maximizes therapeutic efficacy for hormone replacement therapy (Fang et al. 2001).

7.4. Application in peptide drug delivery

The proniosomal drug delivery technology addresses major issues in oral peptide delivery by shielding proteins and peptides from enzymatic degradation. The peptides are saved from GI degradation using a proniosomal dosage form, as the vesicles are capable of providing a surface coating on drug molecules, where the drug is being trapped and can easily survive some harmful factors in the biological system. A vasopressin derivative formulated in a vesicular delivery system demonstrated enhanced oral bioavailability, with superior drug stability and entrapment efficiency (Yoshida et al. 1992). This proniosomal formulation of insulin is one instance of peptide drug delivery. The presence of cholesterol and non-ionic surfactants stabilizes this drug from enzymatic degradation and other biological obstacles. This method provides the stability and significant bioavailability of insulin. Compared to traditional injectable forms, the proniosomal delivery system can provide a more practical and efficient way to manage controlled release and a higher absorption rate in the GI tract (Teaima et al. 2022).

7.5. Application in immune response study

Proniosomes have proven valuable for studying the immune response because of their immunological selectivity, low toxicity, and high stability. Researchers are examining the nature of the immune response triggered by antigens using proniosomes and niosomes (Chandra and Sharma 2008; Kakar 2010). A current study investigated a proniosomal formulation designed for malaria vaccine antigens. These findings indicated that this delivery method significantly increased the immune response, resulting in higher antibody levels in animal models compared to standard formulations (Shegokar 2023). On the other hand, researchers have examined the use of proniosomes to deliver CpG oligodeoxynucleotides as adjuvants. This approach improved the immune response to associated antigens, leading to a stronger T helper (Th1) cell immune reaction in experimental mice (Gogoi et al. 2018).

7.6. Application in hemoglobin delivery

Numerous carrier proteins are found in the blood. Hemoglobin can be easily transported to various locations in the biological systems through proniosomes once they are converted to niosomes. Owing to their permeability to oxygen, niosomal and proniosomal vesicles act as hemoglobin transporters (Radha et al. 2013). These vesicles are important candidate to improve hemoglobin's stability, bioavailability, and controlled release. Proniosomes protect hemoglobin from oxidative damage and facilitate targeted delivery to particular tissues, including ischemic regions with critical oxygen demand. They also allow for non-invasive delivery methods, which enhance patient comfort and compliance. Proniosomes, taken as a whole, offer a flexible and successful method for enhancing hemoglobin treatment in a range of therapeutic situations (Biju et al. 2006; Durga and Veera 2020).

7.7. Application in gene delivery

After moisture-induced conversion to niosomes, proniosomal systems promote efficient gene delivery. Puras et al. described a technique that uses niosomes to transfer the pCMSEGFP plasmid to the retina, highlighting their potential for ocular gene therapy (Puras et al. 2014). By utilizing the solvent emulsification-evaporation process, they developed the niosomes using the cationic lipids 2,3-di(teradecyloxy)propan-1-amine, aqualene, and polysorbate 80. These findings demonstrated that niosomes are capable of shielding DNA from enzymatic degradation and facilitating the entry of gene materials into cells (Puras et al. 2014).

According to a previous study, niosomes can be used as a vehicle to transfer RNAs to human mesenchymal stem cells in order to stimulate cell differentiation. The niosomes have unique characteristics that helps to deliver siRNA/miRNA into cells. These cationic niosomes were developed by using 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium propane (DOTAP), PEGylated lipid (TPGS), and Span 80. Specific gene sequencing in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) can occur when RNAs are complexed with niosomes at the appropriate ratio, and the surface charge is approximately 29.5 mV according to DLS measurements (Figure 3) (Yang et al. 2018).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Schematic of vesicular self-assembly and subsequent endocytosis-mediated siRNA/miRNA delivery. The nanostructure facilitates targeted payload release through signal-triggered membrane fusion. Adapted with permission from reference (Teaima et al. 2022). Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society.

7.8. Other applications

The engineered architecture of proniosomes enables precision drug targeting and controlled release kinetics, expanding their utility beyond conventional disease management.

Sustained release

The pharmaceutical field increasingly adopts proniosomal and niosomal vesicles as advanced platforms for sustained and on-demand release of drugs, addressing critical limitations of traditional drug formulations. After encapsulating a high payload of drug into the core of the vesicles, a minimized dissolution rate was achieved, along with sustained release action and an improved therapeutic index (Madan et al. 2016; Teng et al. 2019). Proniosomes have proven effective in providing prolonged release of various active pharmaceutical ingredients. For instance, a study demonstrated that paclitaxel-containing proniosomes can achieve sustained release, enhancing the drug's bioavailability and improving anticancer efficacy with greater therapeutic outcomes (Najlah et al. 2018). When nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were delivered transdermally, proniosomal formulations considerably prolonged drug release (71.32% over a period of 24 h) in comparison to conventional techniques (Kumar and Jain, 2016 ). An optimized lornoxicam proniosomal gel developed by Madan et al. achieved 66.98% EE and exhibited sustained drug release for more than 24 h (Madan et al. 2016). Proniosomes also maintain the dosing of drugs at a constant level over time, according to a study of metformin hydrochloride for type 2 diabetes treatment. The results highlight the potential of proniosomes to enhance drug distribution and improve therapeutic efficacy, with high drug encapsulation and controlled release of 75.90% after 24 h (Loona et al. 2012).

Targeted drug delivery

Proniosome-based drug delivery is a principal method to achieve local therapeutic action because of the smaller size of nanoparticles and high permeability through connective and epithelial tissues. Proniosomes demonstrated that when a drug is targeted locally, its potency and efficacy are enhanced while minimizing systemic toxicity. For instance, an anti-carcinogenic agent, gossypin-loaded proniosomal gel, demonstrated active transportation of the drug through skin layers for melanoma therapy. As a result, the drug has shown potential and less toxicity (Rajkumar et al. 2021). Another study revealed that an intranasal proniosomal powder loaded with artemether showed enhanced stability, superior penetration, prolonged drug release, and effective brain targeting for the treatment of cerebral malaria induced by Plasmodium falciparum (Uddin et al. 2024). In-vitro and ex-vivo studies have shown that buccal delivery of proniosomal-benzocaine provides targeted sustained release for prolonged anesthesia, making it highly valuable for managing mucosal pain (Abd El-Alim et al. 2014).

8. Biocompatibility and toxicological challenges

Proniosomes are considered to have a good safety profile because of the use of safe and biocompatible components in their preparation. However, some toxicities may occur owing to the chemical nature of surfactants (Yadav et al. 2011). In studies where drugs were delivered by oral and parenteral routes, proniosomes did not exhibit any harmful effects. For example, a lornoxicam-loaded proniosomal formulation was found to be safe and effective (Vijaya et al. 2018). Similarly, lomefloxacin proniosomes revealed that they had a good level of ocular tolerability and did not cause eye redness or inflammation (Khalil et al. 2017). In addition, 5-fluorouracil-loaded proniosomal gel demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy and enhanced safety profiles in cancer treatment (Madan et al. 2016). Hence, collective evidence has established the high safety and excellent tolerability of proniosomes, underscoring their potential for safe and effective therapeutic applications.

9. An analysis of opportunities and obstacles of proniosomes

Proniosomes are positioned as a truly next-generation vesicular platform owing to their compelling profile. However, in order to direct rational composite engineering and clinical advancement, their limitations must be addressed. Among their major advantages, proniosomes significantly improve the solubility and permeability of poorly water-soluble drugs, leading to superior systemic absorption and therapeutic plasma concentrations (Ramkanth et al. 2018). Their inherent architecture enables the controlled and sustained release of active drug molecules to achieve long-term effects and minimize frequent dosing, which is ideal for managing chronic disease (Verma et al. 2016). Furthermore, a variety of therapeutic agents, ranging from small molecules to proteins and nucleic acids, can be effectively encapsulated in the versatile proniosomal matrix. These agents can be engineered for targeted delivery through surface modifications to maximize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing off-target adverse effects. They also reduce systemic exposure to free drugs by incorporating them into biocompatible vesicles, hence reducing the risk of organ-specific toxicity. From a practical standpoint, their exceptional dry state enhances their physicochemical stability by reducing the hydrolysis/oxidation risks associated with aqueous vesicular systems (Kumari et al. 2014). Notably, the methods employed for the preparation of proniosomes are simple and thus amenable to large-scale manufacturing.

However, their transformative potential is offset by several translational obstacles. For instance, higher material (e.g. coating materials, surfactants, cholesterols, etc.) costs for the preparation of proniosomes could impair their industrial production. Surfactant-associated irritation remains a formulation challenge, as some non-ionic surfactants can perturb epithelial integrity at application sites. A substantial absence of comprehensive clinical investigations, along with the inherent complexity of securing regulatory approval for innovative delivery systems, can significantly delay market entry. Since hydration is the primary mechanism of action for proniosomes, their use may not always be practical in clinical settings. Although they are stable in their dry form, their stability may be compromised once hydrated (Bachhav 2016; Benetti et al. 2024). Therefore, a balanced examination of these issues, as illustrated in Figure 4, is critical for strategically directing the future development and clinical translation of proniosomal technology.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The benefits and challenges in proniosomal drug delivery. This image was created with BioRender (https://biorender.com/).

10. Navigating the translational pathway: from bench to bedside

The appealing preclinical data on proniosomes highlight their great promise; nonetheless, the path from intriguing laboratory discovery to mainstream clinical therapy is plagued with acknowledged obstacles that necessitate strategic advances. A thorough examination of this path is required to define the future of this technology.

10.1. Current hurdles and the commercial landscape

Proniosomes have considerable challenges in clinical translation, despite their potential for medicinal use. Widespread adoption is hampered by expensive materials (Khatoon et al. 2017), surfactant-induced irritation (Rajabalaya et al. 2016), and inadequate clinical validation. A comparative clinical study on a tretinoin-loaded proniosomal gel (N8G) for acne treatment in 12 Egyptian patients over the age of 18 years reported superior therapeutic efficacy and a remarkable reduction in skin irritation compared to a standard marketed product (Rahman et al. 2015). While a clear trend toward improvement was observed, the results were not statistically significant, potentially due to the limited statistical power of the small cohort. Similarly, a non-blind, two-treatment, two-period, randomized, crossover clinical investigation of sugar ester-based proniosomes for the transdermal delivery of vinpocetine confirmed enhanced drug permeation and established a well-tolerated profile in human subjects when compared to an oral commercial tablet (El-Laithy et al. 2011). These studies are small (n = 12), short-term (≤4 weeks), and use surrogate endpoints (lesion counts, plasma concentrations) instead of direct clinical outcomes. Additionally, a major absence of large-scale clinical trials data (e.g. on ClinicalTrials.gov) has stalled the transition of this system from the lab to the clinic. This translational gap not only leaves key concerns about human pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy unsolved, but also discourages large-scale pharmaceutical investment.

Furthermore, a review of the intellectual property landscape reveals a thriving, innovative field with significant commercial possibilities. As shown in Table 3, key patents demonstrate a strategic focus on novel niosomal and proniosomal formulations and their targeted therapeutic applications. Foundational, now-expired patents from industry leader L’Oréal pioneered noisome stabilization (EP0611207A1) (Alain Ribier 2001) and cosmeceutical application (US4830857A) (Handjani and Ribier, 1989 ) methods. Furthermore, recent filings (US10364350B2) (Nallani et al. 2019) reflect a shift from broad platform technologies, such as targeted vesicular constructs (US6306838B1) (Singh and Jain 2001) and pro-micelle compositions (US6951655B2) (Cho and Lee 2005), to specialized, high-value vesicular systems. Sustained innovation is evidenced by the predominance of active patents, with expirations extending to 2043. Despite active patenting, the portfolio is dominated by formulation/process improvements, with only a few late-stage clinical candidates, indicating a persistent translation gap. Commercialization becomes more difficult because of regulatory complications and obligatory hydration requirements (Bachhav 2016; Benetti et al. 2024). Additionally, formulation complications arise from stability issues after hydration. Realizing the full market potential of proniosomes requires addressing these constraints through robust manufacturing, tailored excipients, comprehensive characterizations, long-term stability studies, and stringent clinical testing.

Table 3.

Key patents in proniosomal and niosomal drug delivery.

Patent number Assignee Innovation/Title Status/Expiration References
KR102334706B1 Korea Cosmetics Manufacturing Co Ltd. Niosome composition comprising stabilized retinal and personal care composition containing the same Granted-2021 (active)/Anticipated expiration-2041 Kang et al. (2021)
CN102579340A Beijing Increase Pharmaceutical Research Institute Co Ltd., Beijing Increasepharm Co Ltd. Sinomenine vesicle and preparation and preparation method thereof Granted-2016 (active)/Anticipated expiration-2031 Hu Jie (2016)
US11944604B1 King Saud University Nanoformulation of spriooxindole and methods for treating hepatocellular carcinoma Granted-2024 (active)/Anticipated expiration-2043 Barakat et al. (2024)
CN103340823A Southern Medical University Formulation of paeonol proniosomes and preparing method thereof Granted-2015 (active)/Anticipated expiration-2033 Qiang et al. (2015)
US4830857A L’Oréal SA Cosmetic and pharmaceutical compositions containing niosomes and a water-soluble polyamide, and a process for preparing these compositions Granted-1989/Expired-2006 Handjani and Ribier, 1989
EP0611207A1 L’Oréal SA Process for stabilization of vesicles of amphiphilic lipids and composition for topical application containing these stabilized vesicles Granted-2001/Expired-2014 Alain Ribier (2001)
US6306838B1 Panacea Biotec Ltd. Targeted vesicular constructs for cyto protection and treatment of H. pylori infections Granted-2001/Expired-2020 Singh and Jain (2001)
US6951655B2 IMI Biomed Inc Pro-micelle pharmaceutical compositions Granted-2005/Expired-2022 Cho and Lee (2005)
US10364350B2 Agency for Science Technology and Research Singapore Vesicular system and uses thereof Granted-2019 (active)/Anticipated expiration-2030 Nallani et al. (2019)

10.2. Future roadmap: bridging the gap with emerging innovations

In the future, proniosomes can enlighten the pathway of long-acting drug delivery systems to cure diseases while minimizing the rate of side effects and enhancing the therapeutic index through targeted and controlled release to specific tissues and cells. Sustainability will also play a significant role, with a focus on biodegradable materials. Artificial intelligence (AI) will revolutionize proniosome engineering via machine learning-driven QbD. This could be demonstrated by the use of artificial neural networks, deep neural networks to predict optimal surfactant‒cholesterol‒polymer ratios, and Gaussian process models to forecast post-hydration vesicle size, which collectively automate the development of highly stable, effective, and personalized stimuli-responsive composite proniosomes with precise release kinetics (Zidan et al. 2011; Kashani-Asadi-Jafari et al. 2022; Dong et al. 2025). While research evolves, it will be imperative to create educational measures complemented by financial resources to provide professional training in this advanced technology, which will lead to its wider acceptance and views for regulatory endorsement. Collectively, these advantages position proniosomes as a transformative platform poised to redefine future drug delivery paradigms.

11. Conclusion

Proniosomes are an essential aspect of the drug delivery system and have evolved far beyond their origins as stable niosome precursors. They evolved from proliposomal ancestors to next-generation theranostic hybrids to address the inherent instability of conventional vesicular systems by improving their bioavailability, stability, and targeted drug delivery. This was discovered largely due to the advancement in research; and consequently, the combination of nanotechnology as well as various formulation methods are expected to result in enhanced functions, with a focus on bioactive drug molecules as well as biologicals. Furthermore, the proniosomal platform is highly flexible, which aligns with the current shift towards personalized therapeutics. This tunability is evident in its composite character, which can be enhanced by ligands and polymers, in addition to the precise control it provides over size and composition. Switching to biodegradable and sustainable materials, along with AI-integration in product development, will not only address environmental concerns but also promote the marketing of sustainable options. However, extensive clinical translation is hampered by a lack of robust human trials to validate preclinical proofs-of-concept, and the requirement to build standardized, QbD manufacturing methods to overcome regulatory constraints.

The possibility of using proniosomal composite systems in combination with other techniques of drug delivery offers good opportunities for enhancing the effectiveness and preventing adverse effects. Nevertheless, more promising research studies and trials, as well as the approval of various regulatory authorities, need to be conducted to enhance the clinical adoption of the proniosomes. As these concerns are dealt with, awareness about the proniosome technology is imperative for training aspiring researchers and members of the health sciences. In summary, ongoing research on proniosomes will be essential for harnessing their full potential in clinical settings. As we deepen our understanding of this technology, proniosomes may significantly transform drug delivery, ultimately benefiting patient outcomes and therapeutic strategies.

Acknowledgements

Subhankar Mukhopadhyay was partially supported by the Research Committee Postdoctoral Fellowship Scheme of The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Hein Min Tun is an Adjunct Professor at Nanjing Medical University, China, Honorary Associate Professor at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, and Visiting Associate Professor at the National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Funding Statement

This project was partially supported by a start-up research grant and direct grant for research from The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) and grants under the Early Career Scheme and General Research Fund from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (RGC/ECS Project No. 27117022, RGC/GRF Project No. 14113923) to Hein Min Tun. Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee, RGC/ECS: 27117022, RGC/GRF: 14113923.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article, as no new data were created or analyzed in this study. The datasets used for the present study were collected from journals such as Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, SpringerLink, JSTOR, ResearchGate, etc.

Consent for publication

All the authors provided consent for publication.

Ethics approval statement

This article does not contain any studies involving human or animal subjects.

References

  1. Abd El-Alim SH, Kassem AA, Basha M. 2014. Proniosomes as a novel drug carrier system for buccal delivery of benzocaine. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 24(5):452–458. 10.1016/S1773-2247(14)50087-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdelbary GA, Amin MM, Zakaria MY. 2017. Ocular ketoconazole-loaded proniosomal gels: formulation, ex vivo corneal permeation and in vivo studies. Drug Deliv. 24(1):309–319. 10.1080/10717544.2016.1247928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abd-Elbary A, El-laithy HM, Tadros MI. 2008. Sucrose stearate-based proniosome-derived niosomes for the nebulisable delivery of cromolyn sodium. Int J Pharm. 357(1):189–198. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.01.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Abdelkader H, Wu Z, Al-Kassas Ret al. 2012. Niosomes and discomes for ocular delivery of naltrexone hydrochloride: morphological, rheological, spreading properties and photo-protective effects. Int J Pharm. 433(1):142–148. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aboumanei MH, Mahmoud AF. 2020. Design and development of a proniosomal transdermal drug delivery system of caffeine for management of migraine: in vitro characterization, 131I-radiolabeling and in vivo biodistribution studies. Process Biochem. 97:201–212. 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.07.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahmad S, Sabareesh M, Khan PR, Krishna PS, Sudheer B. 2011. Formulation and evaluation of lisinopril dihydrate transdermal proniosomal gels. J Appl Pharm Sci. 1:181–185. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ahmad MZ, Mohammed AA, Mokhtar Ibrahim M. 2017. Technology overview and drug delivery application of proniosome. Pharm Dev Technol. 22(3):302–311. 10.3109/10837450.2015.1135344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ahmed S, Farag MM, Attia Het al. 2025. Exploring the potential of antifungal-loaded proniosomes to consolidate corneal permeation in fungal keratitis: a comprehensive investigation from laboratory characterization to microbiological evaluation. Int J Pharmaceut X. 9:100322. 10.1016/j.ijpx.2025.100322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ahmed MA, Abdelgawad WY, Gad MKet al. 2021. A novel approach for the treatment of oral ulcerative lesion using mucoadhesive proniosome gel. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 63:102460. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102460 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Akbari J, Saeedi M, Enayatifard Ret al. 2020. Curcumin niosomes (curcusomes) as an alternative to conventional vehicles: a potential for efficient dermal delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 60:102035. 10.1016/j.jddst.2020.102035 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Alain Ribier J-TS. 2001. Process for stabilisation of vesicles of amphiphilic lipids and composition for topical application containing these stabilized vesicles. LOreal SA, European Patent Office, EP 0611207A1.
  12. Ali J, Ali M, Baboota Set al. 2010. Potential of nanoparticulate drug delivery systems by intranasal administration. Curr Pharm Des. 16(14):1644–1653. 10.2174/138161210791164108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Alsarra IA, Hamed AY, Alanazi FSet al. 2010. Vesicular systems for intranasal drug delivery. In: Jain KK, editor. Drug delivery to the central nervous system. Humana Press: Totowa, NJ. p 175–203. 10.1007/978-1-60761-529-3_8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Alsarra IA, Bosela A, Ahmed Set al. 2005. Proniosomes as a drug carrier for transdermal delivery of ketorolac. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 59(3):485–490. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Alshora D, Ibrahim M, Alanazi Net al. 2023. Formulation of glibenclamide proniosomes for oral administration: pharmaceutical and pharmacodynamics evaluation. Saudi Pharmaceut J. 31(12):101830. 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Alukda D, Sturgis T, Youan BBC. 2011. Formulation of tenofovir‐loaded functionalized solid lipid nanoparticles intended for HIV prevention. J Pharm Sci. 100(8):3345–3356. 10.1002/jps.22529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Alyami NM, Alnakhli ZA, Alshiban NMet al. 2024. Oral administration of proniosomal glibenclamide formulation protects testicular tissue from hyperglycemia fluctuations and ROS via Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Heliyon. 10(10):e31283. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Araújo Pereira RR, Bruschi ML. 2012. Vaginal mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 38(6):643–652. 10.3109/03639045.2011.623355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bachhav AA. 2016. Proniosome: a novel non-ionic provesicules as potential drug carrier. Asian J Pharmaceut. 10(3):S210–S222. 10.22377/ajp.v10i03.757 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Barakat A, El-Senduny FF, Islam MSet al. 2024.. Nanoformulation of spriooxindole and methods for treating hepatocellular carcinoma. King Saud University, US Patent, US 11944604B1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  21. Benetti AA, Thwin MT, Suhaimi Aet al. 2024. Development of proniosome gel formulation for CHIKV infection. Pharmaceutics. 16(8):994. 10.3390/pharmaceutics16080994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bhatia S, Singh V, Piplani M. 2024. Ethosomes: novel vesicular carriers for effective transdermal delivery of natural therapeutics. Lett Drug Des Discov. 21(4):665–683. 10.2174/1570180820666221226153523 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bhatt R, Singh D, Prakash Aet al. 2015. Development, characterization and nasal delivery of rosmarinic acid-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for the effective management of Huntington’s disease. Drug Deliv. 22(7):931–939. 10.3109/10717544.2014.880860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Biju S, Talegaonkar S, Mishra Pet al. 2006. Vesicular systems: an overview. Indian J Pharm Sci. 68(2):141–153. 10.4103/0250-474X.25707 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bors LA, Erdő F. 2019. Overcoming the blood–brain barrier. challenges and tricks for CNS drug delivery. Sci Pharm. 87(1):6. 10.3390/scipharm87010006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bozdag S, Dillen K, Vandervoort Jet al. 2005. The effect of freeze-drying with different cryoprotectants and gamma-irradiation sterilization on the characteristics of ciprofloxacin HCl-loaded poly(D,L-lactide-glycolide) nanoparticles. J Pharm Pharmacol. 57(6):699–707. 10.1211/0022357056145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Caddeo C, Pons R, Carbone Cet al. 2017. Physico-chemical characterization of succinyl chitosan-stabilized liposomes for the oral co-delivery of quercetin and resveratrol. Carbohydrate Polym. 157:1853–1861. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chacko IA, Ghate VM, Dsouza Let al. 2020. Lipid vesicles: a versatile drug delivery platform for dermal and transdermal applications. Colloids Surf, B. 195:111262. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chandra Ph.D A, Sharma P. 2008. Proniosome based drug delivery system of piroxicam. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2:184–190. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen H, Li B, Qiu Jet al. 2013. Thermal responsive micelles for dual tumor-targeting imaging and therapy. Nanoscale. 5(24):12409–12424. 10.1039/c3nr04529c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen H, Li B, Zhang Met al. 2014. Characterization of tumor-targeting Ag2S quantum dots for cancer imaging and therapy in vivo. Nanoscale. 6(21):12580–12590. 10.1039/C4NR03613A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen H, Chi X, Li Bet al. 2014. Drug loaded multilayered gold nanorods for combined photothermal and chemotherapy. Biomater Sci. 2(7):996–1006. 10.1039/C3BM60323G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen S, Hanning S, Falconer Jet al. 2019. Recent advances in non-ionic surfactant vesicles (niosomes): fabrication, characterization, pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 144:18–39. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cho YW, Lee K-H. 2005. Pro-micelle pharmaceutical compositions. IMI Biomed Inc., US Patent, US 6951655B2.
  35. Dai Y, Zhou R, Liu Let al. 2013. Liposomes containing bile salts as novel ocular delivery systems for tacrolimus (FK506): in vitro characterization and improved corneal permeation. Int J Nanomed. 8:1921–1933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Darson J, Seshadri RT, Katariya Ket al. 2023. Design development and optimisation of multifunctional doxorubicin-loaded Indocynanine green proniosomal gel derived niosomes for tumour management. Sci Rep. 13(1):1697. 10.1038/s41598-023-28891-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. das Neves J, Amiji M, Sarmento B. 2011. Mucoadhesive nanosystems for vaginal microbicide development: friend or foe? WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 3(4):389–399. 10.1002/wnan.144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Din Fu, Choi JY, Kim DWet al. 2017a. Irinotecan-encapsulated double-reverse thermosensitive nanocarrier system for rectal administration. Drug Deliv. 24(1):502–510. 10.1080/10717544.2016.1272651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Din Fu, Kim DW, Choi JYet al. 2017b. Irinotecan-loaded double-reversible thermogel with improved antitumor efficacy without initial burst effect and toxicity for intramuscular administration. Acta Biomater. 54:239–248. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dong S, Yu H, Poupart Pet al. 2025. Gaussian processes modeling for the prediction of polymeric nanoparticle formulation design to enhance encapsulation efficiency and therapeutic efficacy. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 15(1):372–388. 10.1007/s13346-024-01625-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Durga B, Veera L. 2020. Recent advances of non-ionic surfactant-based nano-vesicles (niosomes and proniosomes): a brief review of these in enhancing transdermal delivery of drug. Future J Pharmaceut Sci. 6(1):100. 10.1186/s43094-020-00117-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Eissa RG, Diab NH, Abdelshafi NAet al. 2023. Oral proniosomal amitriptyline and liraglutide for management of diabetic neuropathy: exceptional control over hyperglycemia and neuropathic pain. Int J Pharm. 647:123549. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. El-Emam GA, Girgis GN, El-Sokkary MMAet al. 2020. Ocular inserts of voriconazole-loaded proniosomal gels: formulation, evaluation and microbiological studies. Int J Nanomed. 15:7825–7840. 10.2147/IJN.S268208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. El-Emam GA, El-Baz AM, Shata Aet al. 2023. Formulation and microbiological ancillary studies of gemifloxacin proniosomes for exploiting its role against LPS acute pneumonia model. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 81:104053. 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.104053 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Elhissi A, Hidayat K, Phoenix DAet al. 2013. Air-jet and vibrating-mesh nebulization of niosomes generated using a particulate-based proniosome technology. Int J Pharm. 444(1):193–199. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.12.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. El-Laithy HM, Shoukry O, Mahran LG. 2011. Novel sugar esters proniosomes for transdermal delivery of vinpocetine: preclinical and clinical studies. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 77(1):43–55. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Eltellawy YA, El-Kayal M, Abdel-Rahman RFet al. 2021. Optimization of transdermal atorvastatin calcium – loaded proniosomes: restoring lipid profile and alleviating hepatotoxicity in poloxamer 407-induced hyperlipidemia. Int J Pharm. 593:120163. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Emad Eldeeb A, Salah S, Ghorab M. 2019. Proniosomal gel-derived niosomes: an approach to sustain and improve the ocular delivery of brimonidine tartrate; formulation, in-vitro characterization, and in-vivo pharmacodynamic study. Drug Deliv. 26(1):509–521. 10.1080/10717544.2019.1609622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ensign LM, Cone R, Hanes J. 2014. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery to the vagina: a review. J Control Release. 190:500–514. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Falconer JR, Svirskis D, Adil AAet al. 2015. Supercritical fluid technologies to fabricate proliposomes. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. 18(5):747–764. 10.18433/J3QP58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Fang J-Y, Yu S, Wu Pet al. 2001. In vitro skin permeation of estradiol from various proniosome formulations. Int J Pharm. 215(1):91–99. 10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00669-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Florence AT, Attwood D. 1998. Drug absorption and routes of administration. In: Physicochemical principles of pharmacy. Palgrave, London. p. 372–448. 10.1007/978-1-349-14416-7_10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Fouda NH, Abdelrehim RT, Hegazy DAet al. 2018. Sustained ocular delivery of dorzolamide-HCl via proniosomal gel formulation: in-vitro characterization, statistical optimization, and in-vivo pharmacodynamic evaluation in rabbits. Drug Deliv. 25(1):1340–1349. 10.1080/10717544.2018.1477861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Fukushima K, Ise A, Morita Het al. 2011. Two-layered dissolving microneedles for percutaneous delivery of peptide/protein drugs in rats. Pharm Res. 28(1):7–21. 10.1007/s11095-010-0097-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Furst T, Piette M, Lechanteur Aet al. 2015. Mucoadhesive cellulosic derivative sponges as drug delivery system for vaginal application. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 95:128–135. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gad HA, Kamel AO, Sammour OAet al. 2014. Vesicular powder as carrier for doxycycline hydrochloride and metronidazole combination therapy. Pharm Dev Technol. 19(6):755–768. 10.3109/10837450.2013.829098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gajbhiye KR, Salve R, Narwade Met al. 2023. Lipid polymer hybrid nanoparticles: a custom-tailored next-generation approach for cancer therapeutics. Mol Cancer. 22(1):160. 10.1186/s12943-023-01849-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gamal A, Saeed H, Sayed OMet al. 2020. Proniosomal microcarriers: impact of constituents on the physicochemical properties of proniosomes as a new approach to enhance inhalation efficiency of dry powder inhalers. AAPS PharmSciTech. 21(5):156. 10.1208/s12249-020-01705-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Garg V, Jain GK, Nirmal Jet al. 2013. Topical tacrolimus nanoemulsion, a promising therapeutic approach for uveitis. Med Hypotheses. 81(5):901–904. 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Gogoi H, Mani R, Bhatnagar R. 2018. A niosome formulation modulates the Th1/Th2 bias immune response in mice and also provides protection against anthrax spore challenge. Int J Nanomed. 13:7427–7440. 10.2147/IJN.S153150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Gupta A, Prajapati SK, Balamurugan Met al. 2007. Design and development of a proniosomal transdermal drug delivery system for captopril. Trop J Pharm Res. 6(2):687-693. 10.4314/tjpr.v6i2.14647 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Gupta H, Aqil M, Khar Ret al. 2015. An alternative in situ gel-formulation of levofloxacin eye drops for prolong ocular retention. J Pharm BioAllied Sci. 7(1):9–14. 10.4103/0975-7406.149810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Gurrapu A, Jukanti R, Bobbala SRet al. 2012. Improved oral delivery of valsartan from maltodextrin based proniosome powders. Adv Powder Technol. 23(5):583–590. 10.1016/j.apt.2011.06.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Handjani RM, Ribier A, Vanlerberghe G, Zabotto A, Griat J. 1989. Cosmetic and pharmaceutical compositions containing niosomes and a water-soluble polyamide, and a process for preparing these compositions. LOreal SA, US Patent, US 4830857A.
  65. Hu C, Rhodes DG. 1999. Proniosomes: a novel drug carrier preparation. Int J Pharm. 185(1):23–35. 10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00122-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hu Jie ZY. 2016. Sinomenine vesicle and preparation and preparation method thereof. Beijing Increase Pharmaceutical Research Institute Co Ltd., Beijing Increasepharm Co Ltd., Chinese Patent, CN 102579340A.
  67. Ismail S, Khattab A. 2018. Optimization of proniosomal itraconazole formulation using box behken design to enhance oral bioavailability. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 45:142–150. 10.1016/j.jddst.2018.03.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Izhar MP, Hafeez A, Kushwaha P, Simrah. 2023. Drug delivery through niosomes: a comprehensive review with therapeutic applications. J Cluster Sci. 34(5):2257–2273. 10.1007/s10876-023-02423-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Jafari A, Daneshamouz S, Ghasemiyeh Pet al. 2023. Ethosomes as dermal/transdermal drug delivery systems: applications, preparation and characterization. J Liposome Res. 33(1):34–52. 10.1080/08982104.2022.2085742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Jain KK. 2008. Drug delivery systems-an overview. Drug Delivery Systems. 437:1–50. 10.1007/978-1-59745-210-6_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Jampala R, Gadela R. 2021. Topical drug delivery of 5-fluorouracil proniosomal gel for the treatment of skin cancer: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Pharmaceut Sci Asia. 48(2):147–163. 10.29090/psa.2021.02.20.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Jaradat E, Meziane A, Lamprou DA. 2024. Paclitaxel-loaded elastic liposomes synthesised by microfluidics technique for enhance transdermal delivery. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 15(4):1265–1283. 10.1007/s13346-024-01672-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kakar R, Rao R, Goswami Aet al. 2010. Proniosomes: an emerging vesicular system in drug delivery and cosmetics. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2(4):227–239. [Google Scholar]
  74. Kamel R, Mona B, Abd El-Alim SH. 2013. Development of a novel vesicular system using a binary mixture of sorbitan monostearate and polyethylene glycol fatty acid esters for rectal delivery of rutin. J Liposome Res. 23(1):28–36. 10.3109/08982104.2012.727422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Kang H-s, I M-j, Park S-jet al. 2021. Niosome composition comprising stabilized retinal and personal care composition containing the same. Korea Cosmetics Manufacturing Co Ltd., South Korean Patent, KR 102334706B1.
  76. Kapil S, Rao R, Saini V. 2012. Preparation and evaluation of lornoxicamniosomal gel. Int Res J Pharm. 3:378–383. [Google Scholar]
  77. Kapoor B, Gupta R, Gulati Met al. 2019. The why, where, who, how, and what of the vesicular delivery systems. AdCIS. 271:101985. 10.1016/j.cis.2019.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Kashani-Asadi-Jafari F, Aftab A, Ghaemmaghami S. 2022. A machine learning framework for predicting entrapment efficiency in niosomal particles. Int J Pharm. 627:122203. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Kaur G, Arora M, Kumar MR. 2019. Oral drug delivery technologies—a decade of developments. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 370(3):529–543. 10.1124/jpet.118.255828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Kaur IP, Rana C, Singh Met al. 2012. Development and evaluation of novel surfactant-based elastic vesicular system for ocular delivery of fluconazole. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 28(5):484–496. 10.1089/jop.2011.0176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Khade SM, Behera B, Sagiri SSet al. 2014. Gelatin–PEG based metronidazole-loaded vaginal delivery systems: preparation, characterization and in vitro antimicrobial efficiency. Iran Polym J. 23(3):171–184. 10.1007/s13726-013-0213-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Khalil RM, Abdelbary GA, Basha Met al. 2017. Design and evaluation of proniosomes as a carrier for ocular delivery of lomefloxacin HCl. J Liposome Res. 27(2):118–129. 10.3109/08982104.2016.1167737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Khan MI, Madni A, Peltonen L. 2016. Development and in-vitro characterization of sorbitan monolaurate and poloxamer 184 based niosomes for oral delivery of diacerein. Eur J Pharm Sci. 95:88–95. 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Khatoon M, Sohail MF, Shahnaz Get al. 2019. Development and evaluation of optimized thiolated chitosan proniosomal gel containing duloxetine for intranasal delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 20(7):288. 10.1208/s12249-019-1484-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Khatoon M, Shah KU, Din FUet al. 2017. Proniosomes derived niosomes: recent advancements in drug delivery and targeting. Drug Deliv. 24(2):56–69. 10.1080/10717544.2017.1384520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Khindri S, Aggarwal G, Hari Kumar S. 2015. Role of niosomes and proniosomes for enhancing bioavailability of drugs. J Drug Deliv Therapeut. 5(1):28–33. 10.22270/jddt.v5i1.1043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Khudair N, Agouni A, Elrayess MAet al. 2020. Letrozole-loaded nonionic surfactant vesicles prepared via a slurry-based proniosome technology: formulation development and characterization. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 58:101721. 10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101721 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kim S-J, Puranik N, Yadav Det al. 2023. Lipid nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems: therapeutic advances in the treatment of lung cancer. Int J Nanomed. 18:2659–2676. 10.2147/IJN.S406415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kováčik A, Monika K, Vávrová K. 2020. Permeation enhancers in transdermal drug delivery: benefits and limitations. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 17(2):145–155. 10.1080/17425247.2020.1713087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kraft JC, Freeling JP, Wang Zet al. 2014. Emerging research and clinical development trends of liposome and lipid nanoparticle drug delivery systems. J Pharm Sci. 103(1):29–52. 10.1002/jps.23773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kumar S, Jain PK, Pandey N, Saxena G. 2016. Comparative study of proniosomal drug delivery system of flurbiprofen. J Chem Pharm Res. 8(5):222–228. [Google Scholar]
  92. Kumar GP, Rajeshwarrao P. 2011. Nonionic surfactant vesicular systems for effective drug delivery—an overview. Acta Pharm Sin B. 1(4):208–219. 10.1016/j.apsb.2011.09.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Kumari R, Verma K, Yadav GKet al. 2014. Proniosomes: a key to improved drug delivery. J Drug Delivery Ther. 1:56-65. 10.22270/jddt.v0i0.875 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kuzmov A, Minko T. 2015. Nanotechnology approaches for inhalation treatment of lung diseases. J Control Release. 219:500–518. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Li Q, Li Z, Zeng Wet al. 2014. Proniosome-derived niosomes for tacrolimus topical ocular delivery: in vitro cornea permeation, ocular irritation, and in vivo anti-allograft rejection. Eur J Pharm Sci. 62:115–123. 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.05.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Li M, Li M, Li X, et al. 2023. Preparation, characterization and ex vivo skin permeability evaluation of type I collagen-loaded liposomes. Int J Nanomed. 18:1853–1871. 10.2147/IJN.S404494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Liga S, Paul C, Moacă Eet al. 2024. Niosomes: composition, formulation techniques, and recent progress as delivery systems in cancer therapy. Pharmaceutics. 16(2):223. 10.3390/pharmaceutics16020223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Lin Y-P, Chen W, Cheng Cet al. 2021. Vaginal pH value for clinical diagnosis and treatment of common vaginitis. Diagnostics. 11(11):1996. 10.3390/diagnostics11111996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Loona S, Gupta NB, Khan MU. 2012. Preparation and characterization of metformin proniosomal gel for treatment of diabetes mellitus. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 15(2):108–114. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:40838457 [Google Scholar]
  100. Luo Q, Zhao J, Zhang Xet al. 2011. Nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) coated with chitosan oligosaccharides and its potential use in ocular drug delivery system. Int J Pharm. 403(1):185–191. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Luschmann C, Tessmar J, Schoeberl Set al. 2013. Developing an in situ nanosuspension: a novel approach towards the efficient administration of poorly soluble drugs at the anterior eye. Eur J Pharm Sci. 50(3):385–392. 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Madan JR, Ghuge NP, Dua K. 2016. Formulation and evaluation of proniosomes containing lornoxicam. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 6(5):511–518. 10.1007/s13346-016-0296-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Mahajan K, Sharma P, Abbot Vet al. 2024. Ethosomes as a carrier for transdermal drug delivery system: methodology and recent developments. J Liposome Res. 34(4):697–714. 10.1080/08982104.2024.2339896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Maniyar MM, S. Deshmukh A, J. Shelke S. 2022. Ethosomes: a carrier for transdermal drug delivery system. Asian J Pharmaceut Res. 12(3):225–228. 10.52711/2231-5691.2022.00037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  105. Matharoo N, Mohd H, Michniak-Kohn B. 2024. Transferosomes as a transdermal drug delivery system: dermal kinetics and recent developments. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 16(1):e1918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Mehta M, Harish D, Garg M. 2016. Development and optimization of boswellic acid-loaded proniosomal gel. Drug Deliv. 23(8):3072–3081. 10.3109/10717544.2016.1149744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Meng J, Sturgis TF, Youan B-BC. 2011. Engineering tenofovir loaded chitosan nanoparticles to maximize microbicide mucoadhesion. Eur J Pharm Sci. 44(1):57–67. 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Mishra R, Thakur S, Sharma A, Pawar R. 2024. Formulation & evaluation of topical proniosomal gel for treatment of fungal infections. Int J Res Publicat Rev. 5(1):4399–4404. [Google Scholar]
  109. Mishra A, Kapoor A, Bhargava S. 2011. Proniosomal gel as a carrier for improved transdermal drug-delivery. Asian J Pharm Life Sci. 1(4):370–379. [Google Scholar]
  110. Misra A, Hickey AJ, Rossi Cet al. 2011. Inhaled drug therapy for treatment of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. 91(1):71–81. 10.1016/j.tube.2010.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Misra S, Chopra K, Sinha VRet al. 2016. Galantamine-loaded solid–lipid nanoparticles for enhanced brain delivery: preparation, characterization, in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Drug Deliv. 23(4):1434–1443. 10.3109/10717544.2015.1089956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Mittal S, Chaudhary A, Kumar A. 2020. Proniosomes: the effective and efficient drug-carrier system. Ther Deliv. 11(2):125–137. 10.4155/tde-2019-0065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Moammeri A, Chegeni MM, Sahrayi Het al. 2023. Current advances in niosomes applications for drug delivery and cancer treatment. Mater Today Bio. 23:100837. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Mohamed SA, Rofaeil RR, Salem Het al. 2023. Proniosomal gel-loaded phosphodiesterase inhibitors (sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil): prospects for topical penile therapy of tadalafil for treatment of erectile dysfunction. Gels. 9(8):597. 10.3390/gels9080597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Mohmed E, Ahmed N. 2016. Terconazole proniosomal gels: effect of different formulation factors, physicochemical and microbiological evaluation. J Pharmaceut Drug Delivery Res. 5(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  116. Mohsen AM, El-Hashemy HA, Salama Aet al. 2023. Formulation of tizanidine hydrochloride–loaded provesicular system for improved oral delivery and therapeutic activity employing a 23 full factorial design. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 13(2):580–592. 10.1007/s13346-022-01217-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Mujtaba MA, Kaleem M, Chaware Ret al. 2024. Development and optimization of proniosomal formulation of irbesartan using a box–behnken design to enhance oral bioavailability: physicochemical characterization and in vivo assessment. ACS Omega. 9(14):16346–16357. 10.1021/acsomega.3c10506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Muzzalupo R. 2016. Niosomes and proniosomes for enhanced skin delivery. In: Dragicevic N, Maibach HI, editors. Percutaneous penetration enhancers chemical methods in penetration enhancement: nanocarriers. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg. p 147–160. 10.1007/978-3-662-47862-2_10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Nagarwal RC, Kumar R, Pandit JK. 2012. Chitosan coated sodium alginate–chitosan nanoparticles loaded with 5-FU for ocular delivery: in vitro characterization and in vivo study in rabbit eye. Eur J Pharm Sci. 47(4):678–685. 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Najlah M, Jain M, Wan KWet al. 2018. Ethanol-based proliposome delivery systems of paclitaxel for in vitro application against brain cancer cells. J Liposome Res. 28(1):74–85. 10.1080/08982104.2016.1259628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Nallani M, Sinner E-K, Kunnavakkam M. 2019. Vesicular systems and uses there of. Agency for Science Technology and Research Singapore, US Patent, US 10364350B2.
  122. Nasr M. 2010. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of proniosomes containing celecoxib for oral administration. AAPS PharmSciTech. 11(1):85–89. 10.1208/s12249-009-9364-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Nemr AA, El-Mahrouk GM, Badie HA. 2021. Development and evaluation of proniosomes to enhance the transdermal delivery of cilostazole and to ensure the safety of its application. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 47(3):403–415. 10.1080/03639045.2021.1890111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Neves Jd, Palmeira‐de‐Oliveira R, Rodrigues F. 2014. Vaginal mucosa and drug delivery. In: Mucoadhesive Materials and Drug Delivery Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 99–132. 10.1002/9781118794203.ch05 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  125. Ning M, Guo Y, Pan Het al. 2005. Niosomes with sorbitan monoester as a carrier for vaginal delivery of insulin: studies in rats. Drug Deliv. 12(6):399–407. 10.1080/10717540590968891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Nkanga CI, Fisch A, Rad-Malekshahi Met al. 2020. Clinically established biodegradable long acting injectables: an industry perspective. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 167:19–46. 10.1016/j.addr.2020.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Obeid MA, Khadra I, Aljabali AAAet al. 2022. Characterisation of niosome nanoparticles prepared by microfluidic mixing for drug delivery. Int J Pharmaceut X. 4:100137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Palac Z, Engesland A, Flaten GEet al. 2014. Liposomes for (trans)dermal drug delivery: the skin-PVPA as a novel in vitro stratum corneum model in formulation development. J Liposome Res. 24(4):313–322. 10.3109/08982104.2014.899368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Payne NI, Ambrose CV, Timmins Pet al. 1986. Proliposomes: a novel solution to an old problem. J Pharm Sci. 75(4):325–329. 10.1002/jps.2600750402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Pinzaru I, Tanase A, Enatescu Vet al. 2021. Proniosomal gel for topical delivery of rutin: preparation, physicochemical characterization and in vitro toxicological profile using 3D reconstructed human epidermis tissue and 2D cells. Antioxidants (Basel). 10(1):1–21. 10.3390/antiox10010085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Puras G, Mashal M, Zárate Jet al. 2014. A novel cationic niosome formulation for gene delivery to the retina. J Control Release. 174:27–36. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Qiang L. 2015. Formulation of paeonol proniosomes and preparing method thereof, Southern Medical University, Chinese Patent, CN 103340823A
  133. Radha G, Rani TS, Sarvani B. 2013. A review on proniosomal drug delivery system for targeted drug action. J Basic Clin Pharm. 4(2):42. 10.4103/0976-0105.113609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Rahman SA, Abdelmalak NS, Badawi Aet al. 2015. Formulation of tretinoin-loaded topical proniosomes for treatment of acne: in-vitro characterization, skin irritation test and comparative clinical study. Drug Deliv. 22(6):731–739. 10.3109/10717544.2014.896428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Rajabalaya R, Leen G, Chellian Jet al. 2016. Tolterodine tartrate proniosomal gel transdermal delivery for overactive bladder. Pharmaceutics. 8(3):27. 10.3390/pharmaceutics8030027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Rajan R, Jose S, Biju Mukund Vet al. 2011. Transferosomes-a vesicular transdermal delivery system for enhanced drug permeation. J Adv Pharmaceut Technol Res. 2(3):138–143. 10.4103/2231-4040.85524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Rajkumar J, Radha G, Ganapaty S. 2021. Topical drug delivery of gossypin from proniosomal gel formulations: in vitro efficacy against human melanoma cells. Int J Appl Pharmaceut. 13(1):144–152. 10.22159/ijap.2021v13i1.39609 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Ramadon D, McCrudden MTC, Courtenay AJet al. 2022. Enhancement strategies for transdermal drug delivery systems: current trends and applications. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 12(4):758–791. 10.1007/s13346-021-00909-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Ramkanth S, Chetty CM, Sudhakar Yet al. 2018. Development, characterization & invivo evaluation of proniosomal based transdermal delivery system of atenolol. Future J Pharmaceut Sci. 4(1):80–87. 10.1016/j.fjps.2017.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Reddy KTK, Gandla K. 2022. Novel vesicular drug delivery systems proniosomes. J Pharmaceut Res. 6(3):000272. 10.23880/oajpr-16000272 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  141. Sachan A, K S, Dwivedi T. 2021. A review article on proniosome: as a drug carrier. Asian J Pharmaceut Res Dev. 9(4):128–131. 10.22270/ajprd.v9i4.1010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  142. Sahoo RK, Biswas N, Guha Aet al. 2014. Maltodextrin based proniosomes of nateglinide: bioavailability assessment. Int J Biol Macromol. 69:430–434. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.05.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Saim MAF, Bashir L, Naz Set al. 2022. Development and characterization of cephradine proniosomes for oral controlled drug delivery. Indian J Pharmaceut Educat Res. 56(1):S67–S74. 10.5530/ijper.56.1s.44 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  144. Sakdiset P, Arce FJ, See GLet al. 2023. Preparation and characterization of lidocaine HCl-loaded proniosome gels with skin penetration enhancers. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 86:104639. 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104639 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  145. Salam L, Abdelmottaleb M, Geneidi A. 2021. Formulation and characterization of proniosomal gels loaded with levofloxacin for dermal drug delivery. Archiv Pharmaceut Sci Ain Shams Univ. 5(2):288–303. 10.21608/aps.2021.109363.1077 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  146. Sambhakar S, Paliwal S, Sharma Set al. 2017. Formulation of risperidone loaded proniosomes for effective transdermal delivery: an in-vitro and in-vivo study. Bull Faculty Pharm, Cairo Univ. 55(2):239–247. 10.1016/j.bfopcu.2017.09.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  147. Santos SS, Lorenzoni A, Ferreira LMet al. 2013. Clotrimazole-loaded Eudragit® RS100 nanocapsules: preparation, characterization and in vitro evaluation of antifungal activity against Candida species. Mater Sci Eng C. 33(3):1389–1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Saxena A, Apurvi P, Aslam R. 2023. A review on proniosomes: a propitious outlook to the provesicular drug delivery system. Curr Drug Deliv. 20(8):1115–1126. 10.2174/1567201820666221019093921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Shah J, Nair AB, Jacob Set al. 2020. Enhancement in antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of tramadol by transdermal proniosome gel. Asian J Pharm Sci. 15(6):786–796. 10.1016/j.ajps.2019.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Shah H, Nair AB, Jacob Set al. 2021. Proniosomal vesicles as an effective strategy to optimize naproxen transdermal delivery. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 63:102479. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102479 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  151. Shegokar R. 2023. Malarial drug delivery systems: advances in treatment of infectious diseases. Springer Nature. p x,395. 10.1007/978-3-031-15848-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  152. Shehata TM, Ibrahim MM, Elsewedy HS. 2021. Curcumin niosomes prepared from proniosomal gels: in vitro skin permeability, kinetic and in vivo studies. Polymers. 13(5):791. 10.3390/polym13050791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Shepherd SJ, Issadore D, Mitchell MJ. 2021. Microfluidic formulation of nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 274:120826. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Shruthi P, Pushpadass HA, Franklin MEEet al. 2020. Resveratrol-loaded proniosomes: formulation, characterization and fortification. Lwt. 134:110127. 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110127 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  155. Shruthi PA, Pushpadass HA, Magdaline Eljeeva Emerald Fet al. 2021. Formulation and characterization of catechin‐loaded proniosomes for food fortification. J Sci Food Agric. 101(6):2439–2448. 10.1002/jsfa.10868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Shubhra QT. 2024. Multi-compartment liposomes forge new paths in drug delivery. Nat Chem. 16(10):1578–1579. 10.1038/s41557-024-01638-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Singh A, Jain R. 2001. Targeted vesicular constructs for cytoprotection and treatment of H. pylori infections. Panacea Biotec Ltd., US Patent, US 6306838B1.
  158. Song S, Tian B, Chen Fet al. 2015. Potentials of proniosomes for improving the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 41(1):51–62. 10.3109/03639045.2013.845841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Tareen FK, Shah KU, Ahmad Net al. 2020. Proniosomes as a carrier system for transdermal delivery of clozapine. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 46(6):946–954. 10.1080/03639045.2020.1764020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Teaima M, Gebril M, Allah FIAet al. 2022. Niosomes versus proniosomes as promising drug delivery systems in treatment of diabetes mellitus. Int J Appl Pharmaceut. 14(5):32–40. 10.22159/ijap.2022v14i5.44039 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  161. Teng Z, Yu M, Ding Yet al. 2019. Preparation and characterization of nimodipine-loaded nanostructured lipid systems for enhanced solubility and bioavailability. Int J Nanomed. 14:119–133. 10.2147/IJN.S186899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Trucillo P, Nebbioso V, Brancaccio Ret al. 2024. Nanocarrier‐embedded gels: precision drug delivery via liposomal and niosomal platforms. Polym Adv Technol. 35(4):e6406. 10.1002/pat.6406 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  163. Uddin N, Solunke RS, Joshi SVet al. 2024. A proniosomal drug delivery system for targeting the brain: design, development, and formulation. Afr J Biol Sci. 6(Si3):765–773. [Google Scholar]
  164. Vanić Ž, Škalko-Basnet N. 2013. Nanopharmaceuticals for improved topical vaginal therapy: can they deliver?. Eur J Pharm Sci. 50(1):29–41. 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.04.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Verma P, Prajapati SK, Yadav Ret al. 2016. Single intravenous dose of novel flurbiprofen-loaded proniosome formulations provides prolonged systemic exposure and anti-inflammatory effect. Mol Pharm. 13(11):3688–3699. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Vijaya SK, Sandhya D, Manchala Met al. 2018. Box-behnken method to optimize lornoxicam proniosomes: preparation, in vitro characterization and analgesic activity. Indian Drugs. 55(6):21–33. 10.53879/id.55.06.10289 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  167. Vora B, Khopade AJ, Jain NK. 1998. Proniosome based transdermal delivery of levonorgestrel for effective contraception. J Control Release. 54(2):149–165. 10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00100-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Watmode D, Kubde JA, Hatwar PRet al. 2024. A review on liposome as a drug delivery system for antibiotics. GSC Biol Pharmaceut Sci. 28(01):017–029. 10.30574/gscbps.2024.28.1.0248 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  169. William B, Noémie P, Brigitte Eet al. 2020. Supercritical fluid methods: an alternative to conventional methods to prepare liposomes. Chem Eng J. 383:123106. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123106 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  170. Witika BA, Mweetwa LL, Tshiamo KOet al. 2021. Vesicular drug delivery for the treatment of topical disorders: current and future perspectives. J Pharm Pharmacol. 73(11):1427–1441. 10.1093/jpp/rgab082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Yadav JD. 2011. Niosomes: a review. J Pharm Res. 4(3):632–636. [Google Scholar]
  172. Yadav N, Khan R, Sharma B. 2024. Nanotechnology integration in proniosomal drug delivery system. J Adv Sci Res. 15(7):05–11. 10.55218/JASR.2024150702 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  173. Yang S, Chen Y, Ahmadie Ret al. 2013. Advancements in the field of intravaginal siRNA delivery. J Control Release. 167(1):29–39. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.12.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Yang C, Gao S, Song Pet al. 2018. Theranostic niosomes for efficient siRNA/MicroRNA delivery and activatable near-infrared fluorescent tracking of stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 10(23):19494–19503. 10.1021/acsami.8b05513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Yasam VR, Jakki SL, Natarajan Jet al. 2014. A review on novel vesicular drug delivery: proniosomes. Drug Deliv. 21(4):243–249. 10.3109/10717544.2013.841783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Yoshida H, Lehr C, Kok Wet al. 1992. Niosomes for oral delivery of peptide drugs. J Control Release. 21(1):145–153. 10.1016/0168-3659(92)90016-K [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  177. Yuksel N, Bayindir ZS, Aksakal Eet al. 2016. In situ niosome forming maltodextrin proniosomes of candesartan cilexetil: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Int J Biol Macromol. 82:453–463. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.10.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Zagalo DM, Silva BM, Simões Set al. 2022. A quality by design (QbD) approach in pharmaceutical development of lipid-based nanosystems: a systematic review. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 70:103207. 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103207 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  179. Zhou Q, Tang P, Leung SSYet al. 2014. Emerging inhalation aerosol devices and strategies: where are we headed?. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 75:3–17. 10.1016/j.addr.2014.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Zidan AS, Mokhtar M. 2011. Multivariate optimization of formulation variables influencing flurbiprofen proniosomes characteristics. J Pharm Sci. 100(6):2212–2221. 10.1002/jps.22453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Zidan AS, Rahman Z, Khan MA. 2011. Product and process understanding of a novel pediatric anti-HIV tenofovir niosomes with a high-pressure homogenizer. Eur J Pharm Sci. 44(1):93–102. 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article, as no new data were created or analyzed in this study. The datasets used for the present study were collected from journals such as Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, SpringerLink, JSTOR, ResearchGate, etc.


Articles from Drug Delivery are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES