Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2026 Jan 9;22(1):e1012019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1012019

Zebrafish genetic model of neuromuscular degeneration associated with Atrogin-1 expression

Romain Menard 1, Elena Morin 1,2,3, Dexter Morse 1, Caroline Halluin 1, Marko Pende 1, Aissette Baanannou 1, Janelle Grendler 1, Heath Fuqua 1, Jijia Li 1,4, Laetitia Lancelot 1,4, Jessica Drent 1, Frédéric Bonnet 1, Joel H Graber 1, Prayag Murawala 1,5, Cédric Dray 2,3, Jean-Philippe Pradère 2,3, James A Coffman 1, Romain Madelaine 1,*
Editor: Ken M Cadigan6
PMCID: PMC12810921  PMID: 41511973

Abstract

The degenerative loss of muscle associated with aging leading to muscular atrophy is called sarcopenia. Currently, practicing regular physical exercise is the only efficient way to delay sarcopenia onset. Identification of therapeutic targets to alleviate the symptoms of aging requires in vivo model organisms of accelerated muscle degeneration and atrophy. The zebrafish undergoes aging, with hallmarks including mitochondrial dysfunction, telomere shortening, and accumulation of senescent cells. However, zebrafish age slowly, and no specific zebrafish models of accelerated muscle atrophy associated with molecular events of aging are currently available. We have developed a new genetic tool to efficiently accelerate muscle-fiber degeneration and muscle-tissue atrophy in zebrafish larvae and adults. We used a gain-of-function strategy with a molecule that has been shown to be necessary and sufficient to induce muscle atrophy and a sarcopenia phenotype in mammals: Atrogin-1 (also named Fbxo32). We report the generation, validation, and characterization of a zebrafish genetic model of accelerated neuromuscular atrophy, the atrofish. We demonstrated that Atrogin-1 expression specifically in skeletal muscle tissue induces a muscle atrophic phenotype associated with locomotion dysfunction in both larvae and adult fish. We identified degradation of the myosin light chain as an event occurring prior to muscle-fiber degeneration. Biological processes associated with muscle aging such as proteolysis, inflammation, stress response, extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, and apoptosis are upregulated in the atrofish. Surprisingly, we observed a strong correlation between muscle-fiber degeneration and reduced numbers of neuromuscular junctions in the peripheral nervous system, as well as neuronal cell bodies in the spinal cord, suggesting that muscle atrophy could underly a neurodegenerative phenotype in the central nervous system. Finally, while atrofish larvae can recover locomotive functions, adult atrofish have impaired regenerative capacities, as is observed in mammals during muscle aging. In the future, the atrofish could serve as a platform for testing molecules aimed at treating or alleviating the symptoms of muscle aging, thereby opening new therapeutic avenues in the fight against sarcopenia.

Author summary

As people grow older, muscles become weaker and dysfunctional, making everyday activities challenging. The gradual loss of muscle strength and mass is called sarcopenia, the age associated muscle atrophy, leading to frailty and increased risk of mortality. Today, the best way to slow the onset of sarcopenia is through regular physical exercise, but scientists are actively searching for new treatments that could one day help millions of people to live a longer healthy life.

To reach this goal we have modeled age associated muscle atrophy in zebrafish, an animal model sharing many genetic and physiological similarities with humans. In this study, we report the development, validation and functional characterization of a new zebrafish genetic model of muscle atrophy, the “atrofish” By expressing a molecule called Atrogin-1, already known to trigger muscle wasting in mammals, we found that this model of muscle aging develops muscle degeneration and swimming dysfunction early in life, but also show problems in their neurons and nerve connections in the central and peripheral nervous system respectively. This zebrafish genetic model could help uncover new ways to fight muscle aging and sarcopenia to keep people moving and healthy late in life.

Introduction

Progress in biomedicine has allowed people to live longer; however, living longer does not always mean living a healthier life, as elderly people often suffer from age-related diseases. Such diseases include muscular atrophy, which is characterized by reduced muscle mass and function. The age-related degenerative loss of muscle that leads to muscular atrophy is called sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was recently recognized as a disease by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. It affects more than 60% of people over 80 years of age and results in mobility disorders and significantly increased risk of mortality. The etiology of sarcopenia is multifactorial, and its phenotype has been linked to mitochondrial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, cellular senescence, motoneuron degeneration, and a decline in muscle regenerative capacity [25].

Currently, the primary means of limiting the decline of skeletal muscle mass and delaying muscle atrophy onset is to engage in regular physical exercise. In healthy people, muscular activity increases muscle mass, and muscle injury activates the muscle stem cell population and a regenerative response [6]. Unfortunately, these hypertrophic and regenerative responses to physical training and muscle injury, respectively, are extremely limited in the elderly or under certain muscle dystrophy conditions [7]. Given the increasing age of the population worldwide and a projected life expectancy reaching ~78 years in 2050, there is a critical need to identify and characterize potential novel therapeutic candidates that will impede sarcopenia development in elderly individuals who lack the capacity for physical exercise or have inefficient hypertrophic and/or regenerative responses. Achieving this goal requires a better understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying age-related muscle degeneration.

In turn, advances in research on muscle aging and identification of therapeutic targets to suppress the symptoms of aging require in vivo model organisms of accelerated muscle atrophy and degeneration. The zebrafish has become a widely used animal model for functional studies relevant to human muscle biology and disease [8,9]. Their advantages as a research platform include their small size; their transparency, which facilitates in vivo imaging; and the ease of genetic manipulation. The zebrafish has been used during the last 25 years as a valuable model system to study embryonic development and cellular regeneration. In addition, recently the zebrafish has been widely used as a model for studying the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying aging [1014]. Zebrafish, which have an average lifespan of approximately three years, harbor hallmarks of aging, notably mitochondrial dysfunction, telomere shortening, and protein oxidation. Also, as in mammals, aged zebrafish exhibit senescent-cell accumulation in various tissues. In addition, skeletal-muscle tissue of old (24-month-old) zebrafish shows symptoms of sarcopenia, including scoliosis, muscle mass reduction, and a decline in muscle regenerative capacity [13,15,16].

While natural aging is physiologically the most relevant model for studying age-related phenomena, development in zebrafish of a severe form of muscle atrophy resembling a sarcopenia phenotype usually requires at least three years, hindering time- and cost-efficient analyses. Although a zebrafish model of accelerated aging has been used to study telomerase-dependent aging, i.e., a mutant for the tert gene [10,12,15,16], which codes for a component of telomerase, this mutant may not be the proper model to study aging-associated muscle atrophy. Specifically, while muscle mass is reduced globally in the tert mutant, skeletal muscles, surprisingly, do not show increased senescence. This observation contrasts with induced senescence in other tissues of this mutant, suggesting that different telomerase-dependent mechanisms of aging may be involved in replicative versus non-replicative tissues such as skeletal muscles. It has been hypothesized that the sarcopenia-like phenotype in tert zebrafish could result from high levels of reactive oxygen species in muscles, the senescence-associated secretory phenotype observed in non-muscle tissues such as the gut, and/or poor nutritional state [12,14,16]. While zebrafish mutants and transgenics have been used to study myopathies and muscular dystrophies, no zebrafish models specific for the study of muscle atrophy and degeneration are currently available to study age-related loss of muscle mass and function [11]. Given the many advantages of zebrafish as a model organism, a zebrafish model of accelerated muscle atrophy and degeneration would be an extremely valuable resource.

As noted above, development of a disease resembling human sarcopenia in naturally aging zebrafish requires at least three years. Here, we report the generation, validation, and characterization of a zebrafish genetic model of accelerated muscle atrophy and degeneration that overcomes some of these limitations. This transgenic zebrafish, which we have named the atrofish, exhibits accelerated muscle-fiber degeneration and muscle-tissue atrophy. We developed this novel research tool using a gain-of-function strategy to overexpress a molecule previously shown to be necessary and sufficient to induce muscle atrophy and a sarcopenia phenotype in mice: Atrogin-1 (Atro1) [1719]. Atrogin-1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in protein degradation, and dysregulation of its expression strongly affects muscle-tissue homeostasis [20]. Atrogin-1 shows increased expression in muscles during aging and is involved in sarcopenia onset [1719], and has been identified as a genetic modifier of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in zebrafish [21]. Interestingly, both atrogin-1 loss of function [21] and gain of function [1719] lead to muscle-fiber degeneration, highlighting the delicately balanced regulation of proteolysis required to maintain muscle-tissue integrity. We hypothesized that recapitulating a molecular event that occurs during natural aging at the onset of sarcopenia, such as Atrogin-1 expression, would be an efficient and biologically relevant strategy for inducing muscle atrophy and degeneration.

We demonstrated that overexpression of Atrogin-1 specifically in skeletal-muscle tissue induces muscle-fiber degeneration and an atrophic phenotype associated with locomotion dysfunction in both larvae and adult zebrafish. In addition, analysis of gene expression by RNA-sequencing indicated that biological processes associated with muscle aging and/or degeneration such as proteolysis, inflammation, and the stress response are upregulated in the atrofish. We also identified myosin light-chain degradation as an event occurring prior to muscle-fiber degeneration in the atrofish. Further, we observed a strong correlation between muscle-fiber degeneration and reduced density of neuromuscular (NMJ) junctions in the peripheral nervous system, and also, surprisingly, degeneration of neuronal cell bodies in the spinal cord. This result raises the intriguing hypothesis that muscle atrophy could underlie a neurodegenerative phenotype in the central nervous system. We also demonstrated that locomotion impairment, neuromuscular degeneration, and associated phenotypes correlated with Atrogin-1 overexpression, are reversible in atrofish larvae. Finally, we validated the efficiency of this new genetic model to induce early muscle atrophy and degeneration in adult zebrafish and showed that reduced swimming performance correlated with this phenotype is not reversible. This observation suggests that the muscle regenerative process is impaired after chronic induction of Atrogin-1 expression and muscle degeneration, and supports the use of the atrofish as a model of accelerated muscle aging in young adult zebrafish.

In future studies, the atrofish could open new therapeutic avenues in the fight against neuromuscular degeneration or sarcopenia and be a valuable resource for the scientific community studying the molecular and cellular mechanisms of muscle atrophy, degeneration, and aging. In addition, the atrofish will be a cost-effective and efficient research platform for in vivo testing of therapeutic molecules designed to limit neuromuscular degeneration or promote tissue regeneration.

Results and discussion

Atrogin-1 expression in skeletal muscles induces muscle atrophy, degeneration, and dysfunction in zebrafish larvae

To recapitulate the overexpression of Atrogin-1 occurring during the onset of age-related muscle atrophy, we generated a set of unique genetic tools. First, we used Tol2 transgenesis [22] to establish two novel Cre/lox lines, i.e., Tg(ubi:Lox-stop-Lox-atrogin1) and Tg(503unc:creERT2), to express the Atrogin-1 protein specifically in skeletal-muscle tissue of zebrafish larvae or young adult zebrafish (503unc is a small, muscle-specific promoter [23]; ubi is an ubiquitous promoter [24]). We then validated the capacity of the Tg(503unc:creERT2) transgene to induce loxP-site recombination after addition of hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) and activation of the inducible Cre recombinase [25]. Results demonstrate that after 72 hours of 4-OHT treatment at 10µM, double-transgenic larvae, i.e., Tg(ubi:Lox-egfp-Lox-mcherry) [24] and Tg(503unc:creERT2), exhibit mCherry expression in trunk skeletal-muscle fibers at 6 days post-fertilization (dpf) (S1A in S1 Fig). This observation indicates that the creERT2 protein expressed under regulation of the 503unc promoter induced efficient loxP-site recombination after 4-OHT treatment. We hypothesized that the use of the same strategy in Tg(ubi:Lox-stop-Lox-atrogin1) and Tg(503unc:creERT2) double-transgenic larvae (these double-transgenic fish are referred to hereafter as atrofish) would result in induction of muscle atrophy and muscle-fiber degeneration following Atrogin-1 expression. Using hybridization chain reaction fluorescent in situ (HCR RNA-FISH), we showed an increase in atrogin-1 expression in trunk skeletal-muscle tissue after 48 hours of 4-OHT treatment (Fig 1A). Finally, following treatment of zebrafish larvae with 10µM 4-OHT for 72 hours, we observed an absence of muscle fibers in atrofish larvae at 6 dpf using birefringence analysis with polarized light, while the organization of skeletal muscles in control larvae (DMSO-treated atrofish larvae) is unaffected, with repeated series of v-shaped myotomes (Fig 1A).

Fig 1. Muscle-specific Atrogin-1 expression leads to muscle atrophy and affects locomotor function in zebrafish larvae.

Fig 1

(A) Schematic representation of the method used to express Atrogin-1 in muscle fibers using Tg(503unc:creERT2) and Tg(ubi:Lox-stop-Lox-atrogin1) transgenic lines (atrofish larvae). Efficient recombination of the loxP sites following 4-OHT treatment leads to Atrogin-1-overexpression-dependent muscle atrophy and degeneration, visualized by birefringence analysis using polarized light. Statistical significance is determined Mann-Whitney test. (B) Phalloidin incorporation in control and atrofish larvae after 72 hours of 4-OHT treatment reveals degenerative phenotypes in trunk skeletal-muscle tissue. Asterisk shows a site of muscle-fiber degeneration. (C) Quantification of muscle thickness in control (DMSO; n = 43) and atrofish (4-OHT; n = 51) larvae after 24 hours of 4-OHT treatment. Statistical significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. (D) Quantification of locomotor activity in control (DMSO; n = 12) and atrofish (4-OHT; n = 12) larvae for one hour after 24 hours of 4-OHT treatment. Statistical significance is determined by a Mann-Whitney test, two-tailed, unpaired. (E) Graphical representation of bulk RNAseq analysis and variation in gene-expression profiles in control (DMSO-treated) (n = 4; 50 larvae/sample) vs. atrofish (n = 4; 50 larvae/sample) after 24 hours of 4-OHT treatment. (F) Quantification of cortisol expression levels in control larvae (4-OHT-treated; n = 8 with 30 larvae/sample) and 4-OHT-treated atrofish larvae (n = 8 with 30 larvae/sample) larvae. Statistical significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. (G) Graphical representation of RNAseq analysis and variation in the cell populations based on gene-expression profiles in control vs. cortisol-treated. To map the effects of cortisol exposure to cell and tissue type, marker genes and cell types were identified within the clusters by matching the annotations from the full embryo atlas to the 5 dpf single-cell data (see method for details). Each differentially expressed gene is represented as a dot within the cluster. Error bars represent s.d. Scale bars: 100 μm.

To better characterize the effect of Atrogin-1 expression on trunk skeletal-muscle tissue homeostasis, we quantified the penetrance of the phenotype in atrofish larvae using phalloidin staining to label muscle fibers. We observed multiple phenotypes associated with Atrogin-1 expression, ranging from normal phalloidin incorporation in muscle fibers (similar to controls: 32.35%); to mild defects, with muscle-fiber degeneration occurring in one site within the trunk (only one site of degeneration: 32.35%); to a strong atrophic phenotype, with large areas of muscle tissue missing in different regions along the dorso-ventral axis of the trunk (multiple sites of degeneration: 35.3%) (Fig 1B; 4-OHT at 10µM for 72 hours). Reduced duration of 4-OHT treatment correlates with a gradual reduction of the phalloidin-incorporation percentages associated with the mild and strong phenotypes; results show only 20.7% and 3.4% for the mild and strong phenotypes, respectively, after 24 hours of CreERT2 activation and Atrogin-1 expression (S1B in S1 Fig). In addition, after 24 hours of 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf, we observed an overall reduction of trunk-muscle thickness by ~23% (Fig 1C), supporting the hypothesis of reduced muscle mass in atrofish larvae. Finally, to correlate muscle-fiber degeneration and muscle atrophy with reduced muscle function, we performed locomotion assays. Interestingly, we observed that after only one day of 4-OHT treatment, atrofish larvae show significantly reduced locomotor activity compared to DMSO-only-treated larvae carrying the Tg(ubi:Lox-stop-Lox-atrogin1) and Tg(503unc:creERT2) transgenes (Fig 1D), indicating that Atrogin-1 expression not only affects muscle-fiber survival but also underlies locomotion defects in zebrafish larvae.

Together, these results demonstrate that Atrogin-1 expression in zebrafish skeletal-muscle tissue is an efficient strategy to induce muscle-fiber degeneration and muscle dysfunction. These data support the atrofish as a potentially valuable genetic model for investigating the molecular and cellular mechanisms of muscle atrophy and associated locomotor dysfunction.

Molecular pathways associated with muscle atrophy, degeneration, and aging are dysregulated in the atrofish.

To better characterize the molecular mechanisms involved in the atrophic phenotype, we performed a bulk RNA-sequencing gene-expression analysis during muscle degeneration in atrofish larvae. This analysis was conducted at 6 dpf using mRNA from double-transgenic larvae treated with either DMSO or 4-OHT between 5 and 6 dpf. We identified a total of 1,972 genes that are significantly dysregulated following Atrogin-1 expression between 5 and 6 dpf. Among them, 1,407 genes are upregulated while 565 are downregulated (Fig 1E and S1 Table). Gene ontology analysis indicates that response to stimuli, inflammation, extra-cellular matrix composition, and endopeptidase activity are among the main biological processes dysregulated after Atrogin-1 expression at 6dpf (S1C in S1 Fig). KEGG pathway analysis supports this observation, with NOD-like-receptor and cytokine-cytokine-receptor signaling as the two most highly dysregulated pathways (S1D in S1 Fig). Interestingly, components of the apoptosis and p53 pathways are also highly represented among the dysregulated pathways, suggesting that apoptosis at least partially underlies the degenerative process in the atrofish.

We found that genes associated with immune response and inflammation including, but not limited to, irg1, ccl34, cxcl8, cxcl18, mmp9, and il1b, are highly upregulated following Atrogin-1 expression (S1C in S1 Fig and S1 Table). We quantified the total number of macrophages in trunk skeletal-muscle tissue using the Tg(mpeg1:mCherry) transgenic line and showed that the total number is similar in control and atrofish larvae, suggesting that increased cytokine expression is mediated by a change in the transcriptome profile of resident macrophages (S2A in S2 Fig). We also identified a transcript named zgc:100868 that is overexpressed tenfold in atrofish larvae (S1 Table). Interestingly, this gene is predicted to code for a protein with serine-type endopeptidase activity, orthologous to the two human serine proteases PRSS27 and PRSS53, which are known to have proteolytic functions [26]. This observation supports the hypothesis that proteolysis homeostasis is affected in the atrofish. Finally, sixteen collagen genes are highly downregulated, including col9a1, col1a1, col4a6, col12a1, col2a1 and col11a1 (S1 Table), indicating that in our atrofish model, ECM composition is strongly affected (S1C, S1D in S1 Fig) by muscle degeneration and associated biological processes. To determine whether these ECM modifications are associated with cellular processes underlying muscle aging such as fat infiltration, gliosis, or fibrosis, we analyzed these mechanisms and demonstrated that fat deposition, and fibrosis are not affected in the skeletal neuromuscular system after atrogin-1 induction (S2B-S2E in S2 Fig). This observation suggests that variations in ECM composition are mediated by a switch in collagen-gene expression in muscle tissue.

Our transcriptomic analysis also revealed that expression of the endogenous atrogin-1 gene is increased approximately fourfold following Atrogin-1 expression in atrofish larvae (S1 Table), suggesting a positive feedback loop regulating Atrogin-1 expression during muscle atrophy and degeneration. This observation is consistent with our data showing that FOXO signaling is upregulated in atrofish larvae (S1D in S1 Fig and S1 Table), and with previous evidence that Atrogin-1 is a target gene of the FOXO signaling pathway [27,28]. In addition, a recent study in mice indicated that FOXO transcription factors cooperate with C/EBPδ to control Atrogin-1 expression [29]. Interestingly, a zebrafish ortholog of C/EBPδ, cebpd, is highly upregulated in our transcriptomic analysis (S1 Table), suggesting that it may participate in regulation of Atrogin-1 expression. Finally, our RNAseq study also shows that core components of the stress response involving cortisol are upregulated in atrofish larvae (S1 Table). Indeed, known glucocorticoid-induced targets including klf9, fkpb5, sgk1, and tsc22d3 are highly expressed after Atrogin-1 expression. Supporting this observation, the pomca gene, which codes for the precursor of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), is also overexpressed.

Because inflammation and ACTH control cortisol expression, we next quantified cortisol levels via ELISA and determined that cortisol expression levels are significantly higher in atrofish larvae than in DMSO-treated control larvae (Fig 1F). Interestingly, previous studies have associated high cortisol levels with upregulation of atrogin-1 expression and demonstrated that this induction is dependent on glucocorticoid receptors function [3032]. A gene expression analysis to define cell populations affected by chronic cortisol treatment showed that cortisol-treated larvae exhibit a severe negative impact on muscle cells homeostasis (Fig 1G). These data are highly relevant for understanding the etiology of age-related muscle atrophy, because high cortisol levels are associated with muscle atrophy [3335] and have been suggested as a biomarker of sarcopenia [36]. Together, these observations suggest crosstalk between Atrogin-1-dependent proteolysis, inflammation, stress responses, and apoptosis, potentially leading to neuromuscular degenerative phenotypes and ECM remodeling in the atrofish.

Myosin light-chain degradation precedes muscle degeneration in the atrofish

The above experiments validated the atrofish as a genetic model of muscle atrophy and reduced muscle function. We next aimed to use it to identify new molecular and/or cellular mechanisms leading to muscle weakness and/or muscle degeneration. Because Atrogin-1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase, it can potentially target a wide variety of proteins for degradation. While most Atrogin-1 targets are not known, some have been identified, including, but not limited to, calcineurin, aquaporin 4, nuclear factor-kB, MyoD, and cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C) [3740]. Recently, an elegant report indicated that the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP is also a target of Atrogin-1 contributing to Duchenne muscular dystrophy [21]. Based on the evidence that cMyBP-C is a target of Atrogin-1, we hypothesized that reduced levels of myosin and/or related proteins involved in myosin-complex formation and function could be, at least partially, responsible for the atrophic phenotype observed in atrofish larvae. Using an F310 antibody that recognizes myosin light chains in fast-twitch muscle fibers, we observed dramatically reduced F310 staining in atrofish larvae after 72 hours of 4-OHT treatment at 10µM (S3A in S3 Fig). Darkfield imaging revealed that while F310 staining is absent in the trunk of 4-OHT-treated larvae, the shape of skin, notochord, and myotomes can be observed (S3A, S3B in S3 Fig), indicating that the axis of the larva is not broken but that no myosin light-chain proteins are present in the tissue. Surprisingly, reduced F310 staining is not always associated with the absence of all muscle fibers. In addition, in atrofish larvae we observed retention of phalloidin staining in some regions of myotomes in which F310 labelling is strongly reduced (Fig 2A), indicating the presence of muscle fibers despite the absence of myosin light-chain expression. This analysis suggests that myosin light-chain protein can be lost after atrogin-1 expression and before muscle-fiber degeneration. Quantification of phalloidin and F310 staining over time in atrofish larvae revealed that most larvae exhibiting reduced F310 staining in regions of trunk-muscle tissue also show reduced phalloidin incorporation in those regions (S3C in S3 Fig). Indeed, only ~3% and ~8% of atrofish larvae show reduced or absent F310 staining without an effect on phalloidin incorporation in muscle fibers after 48 or 24 hours of 4-OHT treatment, respectively. This observation suggests that phalloidin incorporation is rapidly reduced when myosin light-chain expression and function are impaired. Finally, co-immunolabeling of atrofish larvae with phalloidin, F310 (myosin light chains in fast-twitch muscle fibers), and A4.1025 (myosin heavy chains in slow- and fast-twitch muscle fibers) antibodies followed by confocal imaging of myotomes after 24 hours of 4-OHT treatment indicated that myosin light-chain, but not myosin heavy-chain, expression can be rapidly reduced independently of muscle-fiber degeneration (S3D in S3 Fig). Together, these results indicate that Atrogin-1 overexpression in zebrafish affects the expression and/or stability of myosin light chains before muscle-fiber degeneration.

Fig 2. Muscle-specific Atrogin-1 expression leads to myosin light-chain degradation and neuromuscular degeneration in atrofish larvae.

Fig 2

(A) Apotome sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing phalloidin incorporation (green) and F310 immunolabelling (purple) in trunk skeletal muscles. White arrow shows phalloidin incorporation in the absence of F310 expression. (B) Confocal sections of atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 (top) or 48 (bottom) hours at 6 dpf showing GFP expression from Tg(murf1a:gfp) in muscle fibers (green) and F310 immunolabelling (purple) in trunk skeletal muscles. White arrow shows GFP expression in the absence of F310 expression. (C) Confocal sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing phalloidin incorporation (green) and znp-1 (purple) immunolabelling in trunk skeletal muscles. (D) Apotome sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing motoneuron degeneration using the mnx1:mCherry transgenic line. Asterisk indicates the site of degeneration in the spinal cord. Asterisks show sites of muscle-fiber degeneration. Scale bars: 100 μm.

To confirm the role of Atrogin-1 in myosin light-chain degradation in the observed atrophic phenotype in the atrofish, we used the Tg(MuRF1a:GFP) line, which labels muscle fibers, and also used the F310 antibody to specifically label fast-twitch fibers. As shown with phalloidin incorporation (Fig 2A), we demonstrated that after 48 hours of 4-OHT treatment, areas of myotomes showing reduced F310 staining generally also show an absence of GFP expression (Fig 2B), supporting the notion that the muscle-fiber-degeneration and/or muscle-breakdown phenotype is induced by Atrogin-1 expression. Interestingly, 24 hours of 4-OHT treatment can lead to a reduction or absence of myosin light-chain expression despite the presence of GFP-expressing fast-twitch muscle fibers (Fig 2B). This result confirms our previous observations and suggests that early reduction of myosin light-chain expression primes muscle tissue for degeneration, leading to muscle weakness and dysfunction. In the future, a more precise determination of the timing of myosin light-chain degradation relative to that of muscle-fiber degeneration will be needed to fully understand the relationship between the two processes. However, such an investigation would likely require a destabilized fluorescent protein fused to the myosin light-chain protein to perform live imaging of these degenerative processes. Based on these observations, together, we can confidently propose that this genetic model of myosin complex degradation will be valuable for future identification of therapeutic compounds that can stabilize or prevent degradation of myosin light chains as well as associated proteins during muscle atrophy.

Muscle atrophy leads to spinal-neuron degeneration in the atrofish

Having identified an atrophic and degenerative muscle phenotype associated with locomotor dysfunction in the atrofish, we next investigated organization and homeostasis of the neuromuscular system. In muscle tissue, the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) mediates muscle contractions in response to neuronal stimuli. To analyze NMJ maintenance following muscle-fiber degeneration in the atrofish, we first performed axonal and synaptic staining using anti- acetylated-tubulin (axons) and SV2 and znp-1 (pre-synapses) antibodies. We observed reduced peripheral nervous system innervation and synaptic density in muscle tissue at 6 dpf after 24 or 48 hours of 4-OHT treatment compared to control larvae (Fig 2C and S4A in S4 Fig). Interestingly, we found that reduced muscle-tissue innervation correlates positively with muscle-fiber degeneration (Fig 2C and S4A in S4 Fig), suggesting that disrupting synapse stability could also potentially promote motoneuron degeneration. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed motoneurons maintenance using the Tg(mnx1:mCherry) line and revealed that following muscle-fiber degeneration in atrofish larvae, NMJ density is reduced in the atrophic area and this phenotype is associated with reduced motoneuron-cell-body density in the spinal cord (Fig 2C-2D). We observed motoneuron degeneration in the spinal cord in 19%, 11%, and 8% of the atrofish larvae after 72, 48, and 24 hours of 4-OHT treatment, respectively (S4B in S4 Fig). Using the Tg(mnx1:mCherry) line, we analyzed the neuronal degenerative phenotype of atrofish larvae by quantifying the global volume of motoneuron cell bodies in the spinal cord and axons in the peripheral system, axon branching, and NMJ density in control (wild-type larvae treated with DMSO or 4-OHT, and atrofish larvae treated with DMSO) and 4-OHT-treated atrofish larvae (Fig 3A-A” and S1 and S2 Movies). Finally, using HCR RNA-FISH for the mpeg1.2 gene on the mnx1:mCherry genetic background labeling motoneurons, we identified macrophages in the degenerating muscle tissue, particularly in close vicinity to fragmented motoneuron axons and NMJ, with some macrophages showing GFP and mCherry fluorescence (Fig 3B). These HCR RNA-FISH results suggest that, based on mpeg1.1:mCherry expression, immune-cell numbers do not differ significantly between control and atrofish larvae, but that the localization of mpeg1.2 + macrophages may differ between control and atrofish larvae. These results in turn suggest that immune cells are removing degenerated muscles and neurons, and that inflammation is associated with neuromuscular degeneration. Surprisingly, we also determined that muscle-fiber degeneration is a prerequisite to degeneration not only of motoneurons but also of other spinal neurons such as sensory neurons and interneurons, as revealed by the absence of HuC/D expression (a generic marker of postmitotic neurons) and SV2 (pre-synapses) labelling in the spinal cord (S4C in S4 Fig). Concordantly, we have observed no examples of neuron degeneration in the presence of muscle fibers (the latter revealed by phalloidin or A4.1025 staining), and we showed that spinal-neuron degeneration correlates with the absence of muscle fibers (S4D in S4 Fig). Finally, we demonstrated that dorsal root ganglia in the peripheral sensory system or neurons in the gut are not affected by muscle-fiber degeneration (S4D in S4 Fig), suggesting that the neuronal cell bodies degenerative phenotype is specific to the spinal cord in the central nervous system. Altogether, these data indicate that the muscle-fiber degeneration underlying muscle atrophy can lead to neurodegeneration in both the peripheral (NMJ) and central nervous system (cell bodies).

Fig 3. Muscle-specific Atrogin-1 expression affects motoneurons in the central and peripheral nervous system.

Fig 3

(A) Confocal projections (top) and 3D reconstructions (bottom) of control or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 48 hours at 6 dpf. (A’, A”) Analysis of the motoneuron system reveals that motoneurons, axon branching, and neuromuscular connectivity and density (NMJ) are affected in atrofish (DMSO; n = 8 and 4-OHT; n = 7) but not in WT larvae treated with 4-OHT (DMSO; n = 20 and 4-OHT; n = 20). Each biological component was isolated and assigned a unique color label: white (spinal cord), red (axons), magenta (NMJs) and yellow (immune cells mpeg1.2 + macrophages in Fig 3B). Statistical significance was determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired with Welch’s correction. (B) Confocal sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (top) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT (bottom) for 48 hours at 6 dpf showing macrophages in close vicinity of the motoneuron axons and NMJ (mnx1:mCherry) in the degenerating muscle tissue (murf1a:GFP). Arrows show mpeg1 + macrophages expressing both GFP and mCherry (DMSO; n = 7 and 4-OHT; n = 7). Statistical significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired with Welch’s correction. Error bars represent s.d. Scale bars: 100 μm.

While it has been postulated, tested, and widely accepted that denervation and loss of functional synaptic interactions at the NMJ has an impact on muscle-fiber homeostasis with the potential to lead to muscle atrophy [4144], the idea that the reverse sequence of events, i.e., muscle atrophy could lead to neurodegeneration, has not been thoroughly investigated. To our knowledge there is currently no direct evidence that this “reverse” process takes place. Our experiments above, conducted in a zebrafish model of muscle degeneration, reveal that muscle-specific expression of Atrogin-1 leading to skeletal-muscle atrophy can indirectly negatively impact the central nervous systems and spinal-neuron survival. This observation suggests a new pathological component in the etiology of neuromuscular degeneration, and potentially sarcopenia, and raises the intriguing possibility of a detrimental and degenerative feedback loop between muscle fibers and motoneurons during muscle aging.

Muscle dysfunction is reversible in atrofish larvae

The above analysis demonstrates that Atrogin-1 expression in zebrafish larvae underlies neuromuscular degeneration and locomotion dysfunction. We uncovered some of the molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with these defects. We demonstrated that myosin light-chain degradation, muscle atrophy, and neurodegeneration are associated with increased proteolysis, cellular stress, inflammation, and ECM remodeling following Atrogin-1 expression in muscle fibers. To determine whether or not these phenotypes are reversible, we analyzed the recovery of locomotion capacities in atrofish larvae following discontinuation of 4-OHT treatment. We first demonstrated that 4-OHT-treated atrofish larvae show reduced locomotion between 6 and 8 dpf compared to DMSO-treated atrofish larvae and 4-OHT-treated wild-type (WT) larvae (Fig 4A and S3 Movie). Treatment with 4-OHT has no significant impact on cardiovascular-system function in WT or atrofish larvae, as cardiac volume, heartbeat, and blood flow are comparable between the two conditions (Fig 4C and 4D, and S4 and S5 Movies), suggesting that neuromuscular dysfunction is the main driver of reduced locomotion. We next treated atrofish larvae with DMSO or 4-OHT for 24 hours (between 5 and 6 dpf, larvae were treated with DMSO or 4-OHT for 24 hours before the locomotion test), and then placed all larvae in chemical-free medium for a 48-hour locomotion test. We observed that following placement in chemical-free medium, the 4-OHT-treated atrofish larvae recovered locomotion functions and performed similarly to the DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (Fig 4B and S6 Movie). Interestingly, our results also showed that after recovery, 4-OHT-treated atrofish larvae exhibited a circadian pattern of activity identical to that of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae, suggesting that that their circadian clock is functional. Together, these results indicate that the locomotion-defect phenotype is reversible and suggests that atrofish larvae are able to recover from their muscle and neural deficits. While the question of whether the rapid swimming recovery is driven by a regenerative response still requires investigation, the timing suggests that preventing atrogin-1 overexpression in muscle fibers limits the death of additional muscle fibers and allows for an efficient return to a homeostatic and functional state. Indeed, while most, if not all, larvae exhibit defective locomotion, only a small percentage of atrofish exhibit severe neuronal degeneration and/or muscle degeneration after 24 hours of 4-OHT treatment (S1B and S4B in S1 and S4 Figs). Together, these observations indicate that mechanisms other than atrogin-1 overexpression could underlie the defect in locomotion. Because our transcriptomic analysis identified inflammation, the stress response, and ECM remodeling as biological processes significantly dysregulated in atrofish, we hypothesized that these cellular mechanisms could also participate in the reduced swimming capacity phenotype. In addition, if these cellular processes do indeed contribute to defective swimming in atrofish, they could potentially be reversed more quickly than would be possible via the level of cell regeneration required to enable locomotion recovery. We therefore hypothesize that these cellular mechanisms could underlie recovery of swimming function. Further experiments using anti-inflammatory molecules or fish mutants with knockout of the glucocorticoid receptor gene would allow testing of these hypotheses.

Fig 4. Atrogin-1-dependent muscle dysfunction is reversible in atrofish larvae.

Fig 4

(A, B) Quantification of locomotion activity in zebrafish larvae. (A) WT larvae treated with 4-OHT (n = 8) and atrofish larvae treated with DMSO (n = 8) or 4-OHT (n = 8). Larvae were treated with DMSO or 4-OHT for 24 hours between 5 and 6 dpf before the locomotion test, and for 48 hours during the test. The figure shows only the 48-hour test results. (B) Atrofish larvae treated with DMSO or 4-OHT. Larvae were treated with DMSO (n = 12) or 4-OHT (n = 11) for 24 hours between 5 and 6 dpf before the locomotion test, and then placed in chemical-free medium for 48 hours during the locomotion test. The figure shows only the 48-hour test results. Statistical significance is determined by multiple t-test comparison with False Discovery Rate and individual variance for each time point, two-tailed, unpaired. (C, D) Quantification of heart volume after 3D reconstruction in control fish (n = 5) or atrofish (n = 5) (C) or heartbeat using the cmlc2:gfp transgene expressed in cardiomyocytes (D) at 6 dpf in control fish (WT fish) (n = 8) or atrofish (n = 8) treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours between 5 and 6 dpf. Statistical significance is determined by multiple t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. (E) Graphical representation of bulk RNAseq analysis and variation in gene-expression profiles in DMSO-treated control larvae (n = 4; 50 larvae/sample) vs. atrofish (n = 4; 50 larvae/sample) after 24 hours of 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf, followed by 2 days of recovery until 8 dpf. (F) Quantification of cortisol expression levels in control larvae (4-OHT-treated; n = 3 with 30 larvae/sample n = 30) and 4-OHT-treated atrofish larvae (n = 3 with 30 larvae/sample) after recovery. Statistical significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. Error bars represent s.d. Scale bars: 50 μm.

To characterize the recovery response at the molecular level, we performed gene-expression analysis at 8 dpf using mRNA from atrofish larvae treated with either DMSO or 4-OHT between 5 and 6 dpf and then placed in chemical-free medium for 48 hours. We observed that only 124 genes are significantly dysregulated at 8 dpf, i.e., after 48 hours of recovery (Fig 4E and S2 Table), suggesting that 4-OHT-treated atrofish larvae progressively returned to homeostatic conditions following their return to chemical-free medium between 6 and 8 dpf. We then performed GO and KEGG analyses using our gene-expression results. Interestingly, immune and defense responses remain highly represented in 4-OHT-treated atrofish larvae after 48 hours of recovery (S5A and S5B in S5 Fig), but markers for macrophage and neutrophil populations, mpeg and mpx, respectively, are no longer significantly upregulated at this time (S2 Table). In addition, some pro-inflammatory genes that are significantly upregulated at 6 dpf, including ccl34, cxcl8, cxcl18, mmp9, and il1b, are also no longer significantly upregulated at 8 dpf. These data suggest that shortly after recovery of 4-OHT-treated atrofish larvae from locomotion defects, the pro-inflammatory response is reduced in favor of a pro-regenerative (or anti-inflammatory) response, as indicated by high expression of the IL-22 receptor gene (IL-10 family receptors [45]). Stress-response genes, glucocorticoid-receptor-target genes and cortisol are also no longer overexpressed at 8 dpf in atrofish larvae (S2 Table and Fig 4F). Together, the above results indicate that the recovery of locomotion capacity in 4-OHT-treated atrofish larvae correlates with reduced stress and pro-inflammatory responses.

Young adult atrofish exhibit reduced muscle mass and swimming performance

To determine whether the atrophic phenotype that we observe in zebrafish larvae and that is dependent on Atrogin-1 expression in skeletal muscles is recapitulated in adult fish, we treated one-month-old fish carrying Tg(ubi:Lox-stop-Lox-atrogin1) and Tg(503unc:creERT2) transgenes with 1.25µM of tamoxifen (TAM), once every week until 6 months of age. To analyze muscle atrophy, we performed tissue-clearing of whole adult muscle tissue [46]. In combination with MesoSPIM light-sheet microscopy for macrosamples [47], tissue-clearing allowed us to assess and quantify muscle integrity by imaging the fluorescence of the muscle tissue by GFP expression analysis in muscle fibers from the murf1a:gfp transgene. We observed a significant number of areas in the muscle tissue of TAM-treated atrofish with muscle-fiber degeneration (Fig 5A). Volumetric analysis using 3D reconstruction reveals that the volume of GFP+ muscle tissue in the atrofish is ~ 37% less than that of control animals (Fig 5B and 5C). This observation indicates that chronic Atrogin-1 expression in young zebrafish leads to early muscle atrophy and degeneration. In addition to the reduction in muscle volume, we also quantified a 13% reduction in muscle tissue expressing GFP in the atrofish compared to the expected calculated volume after 3D reconstruction (Fig 5D and 5E), suggesting that the atrofish exhibit not only an atrophic phenotype but also reduced muscle mass and muscle degeneration inside the tissue. We identified an average of ~75 sites of injury in the atrofish versus ~10 in control fish (Fig 5F), with an average muscle-degeneration volume of ~4.11x106 µm3 in atrofish versus ~1.06x106 µm3 in control fish (Fig 5G). The distribution of the injury sites indicates that atrofish harbor larger numbers of both small-volume and large-volume injuries compared to control fish at 6 months of age (Fig 5H and 5I). We then calculated the percentages of injuries at different positions in the truck (at each position, the percentage of the total number of injuries in the trunk), and the average injury volume at each position, to correlate the sites of degeneration with the position of the fins. Interestingly, we observed that adult atrofish have ~ 50x, ~ 15x, and ~3x greater amounts of degenerated tissue than control fish at the anal, dorsal, and caudal fins, respectively (S5C in S5 Fig). The above observation suggests that muscle contraction is involved in the development of the degenerative phenotype, with greater numbers of larger injuries at the anal and dorsal fins in the adult atrofish. In addition, we observed a slight but significant reduction in the size of TAM-treated atrofish compared to TAM-treated control fish, 6 months after treatment (S5D and S5E in S5 Fig). To determine if muscle atrophy and degeneration are associated with reduced muscle function, we tested swimming performance. We showed that at 6 months of age, swimming performance of atrofish is reduced by 31% compared to that of control fish (Fig 5J), indicating that muscle atrophy correlates with reduced muscle function in young animals (males and females perform similarly, for both control fish and atrofish; S5F in S5 Fig). However, we observed that control fish treated with TAM until 6 months of age show a slight, but significant, increase in swimming performance compared to control fish treated with DMSO until 6 months of age (Fig 5J). This effect could be attributed to a moderate positive impact of TAM treatment on muscle tissue, as studies in mice have suggested that TAM could have a beneficial effect on muscle hypertrophy and function [4851]. We also demonstrated that 4-OHT treatment of WT larvae has no negative impact on neuronal survival or neuromuscular-system organization. Rather, we observed a slight increase in motoneurons after 4-OHT treatment of WT larvae. Together, these observations suggest that neither TAM nor 4-OHT treatment has a significant negative effect on the zebrafish neuromuscular system that would be responsible for locomotion defects. Next, we asked if, as we observed in larvae, the locomotor phenotype is reversible in adult fish. To test this, we allowed some fish previously treated with TAM between 1 and 6 months of age to recover by maintaining the fish without treatment between 6 and 9 months of age. Importantly, both males and females again showed similar swimming performances in each experimental condition (S5G in S5 Fig). Interestingly, we observed that the swimming performance of “recovered” nine-month-old atrofish is still poorer than that of control fish (Fig 5K). These data indicate that 3 months after stopping the TAM treatment, an efficient regenerative response does not take place in adult atrofish. This observation raises the hypothesis that the muscle stem-cell pool is dysfunctional (senescence?) or absent (exhaustion?) in these animals, potentially because of continuous muscle-fiber degeneration associated with chronic inflammation and stress. Future studies will explore the mechanisms underlying the non-regenerative phenotype in the adult atrofish after chronic Atrogin-1 expression.

Fig 5. Atrogin-1-dependent muscle dysfunctions are irreversible in chronically treated adult atrofish.

Fig 5

(A) Brightfield imaging of adult zebrafish trunk after tissue-clearing showing degeneration of skeletal-muscle tissue in one-month-old atrofish treated with tamoxifen (TAM) for 5 months (bottom) compared to TAM-treated control fish (control; top) at 6 months of age. Arrows indicate regions of degeneration. (B) Quantification of the volume of muscle tissue in TAM-treated control fish (n = 6) or atrofish treated with either DMSO (n = 3) or TAM (n = 10). Statistical significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. (C) Representative images of 3D reconstructed trunk skeletal-muscle tissue after chronic TAM treatment in control fish (top) or atrofish (bottom) at 6 months of age. (D) Quantification of the volume expected after 3D reconstruction of atrofish trunk skeletal-muscle tissue (n = 10). Statistical significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, paired. (E) Representative images of 3D reconstructed trunk skeletal-muscle tissue after chronic TAM treatment in atrofish at 6 months of age. (F, G) Quantification of the number of focal injuries in TAM-treated control fish (n = 6) and TAM-treated atrofish (n = 6) at 6 months of age after 3D construction (F). Quantification of the average volume of injuries in TAM-treated control fish (n = 6) and TAM-treated atrofish (n = 6) at 6 months of age after 3D construction (G). Statistical significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired with Welch’s correction. (H) Quantification of the distribution of the injuries identified in (G) in TAM-treated control fish (n = 6) and TAM-treated atrofish (n = 6) at 6 months of age after 3D construction. n in the graphic indicates the number of injuries per biological replicate. Injuries from 6 biological replicates for control or atrofish have been pulled together to determine statistical significance using t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. (I) Representative images of the numbers and sizes of injuries in trunk skeletal-muscle tissue after chronic TAM treatment in control (top) or atrofish (bottom) at 6 months of age. Each color represents a single injury, quantified in (H). (J) Quantification of swimming capacity of control fish and atrofish at 6 months of age treated with either DMSO or 4-OHT for 5 months (n = 19 for each condition). Statistical significance is determined by Mann-Whitney test, two-tailed, unpaired. (K) Quantification of swimming capacity of control fish (n = 9) and atrofish (n = 15) at 9 months of age, treated with TAM for 5 months, i.e., between 1 and 6 months of age, and then treated with either DMSO (ctrl, n = 5; atro, n = 4) or TAM (ctrl, n = 4; atro, n = 11) for an additional 3 months (i.e., until 9 months of age), to test for recovery of swimming function. Statistical significance is determined by a Two-way Anova. Error bars represent s.d. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Together, our work validates the atrofish as a new genetic model of muscle atrophy, both in zebrafish larvae and adults (Fig 6). We demonstrated that muscle-specific expression of Atrogin-1 leads to dysregulation of processes associated with proteolysis, inflammation, the stress response, and apoptosis. We also identified myosin light-chain degradation as a potential driver of muscle weakness and reduced muscle function. Our observations that many injury sites are located at the anal and/or dorsal fins in both larvae and adult atrofish also suggest that muscle contraction and locomotion behavior are involved in development of the degenerative phenotype. Unexpectedly, muscle-fiber degeneration was correlated not only with NMJ reduction but also with spinal-neuron degeneration. The question of whether or not this phenotype also occurs during degenerative diseases such as sarcopenia in mammals remains unanswered.

Fig 6. Graphical representation of the biological processes underlying the neuromuscular degeneration phenotype associated with Atrogin-1 expression.

Fig 6

Created in BioRender. Menard, R. (2025) - https://BioRender.com/1kpf9fg.

In conclusion, the atrofish is a new genetic model of accelerated neuromuscular degeneration. Determination of its value as a proper model of accelerated muscle aging will require further investigation. Currently, the atrofish provides opportunities to better understand the biological mechanisms underlying degenerative phenotypes associated with Atrogin-1 expression as observed during sarcopenia development in mammals. It also represents a vertebrate genetic model, in larvae and young adult fish, for testing and screening drugs for their therapeutic potential to limit neuromuscular degeneration and/or promote regeneration and alleviate some of the symptoms associated with muscle atrophy and aging.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Experiments were performed in accordance with animal care guidelines. Our IACUC animal protocol (AUP#22–06) is approved by the MDI Biological Laboratory IACUC ethics committee (chair: Wynne Guglielmo; veterinarian: Peter Merril).

Study design and statistical analysis

Research subjects (larval stage, adults vs. larvae, and genotype) and treatments applied are defined in the figures and/or figure legends. Experimental analyses were performed with a minimum of 3 biological replicates (and a minimum of 3 technical replicates when applicable). Regarding statistical power, we calculated the effect size with Cohen’s D and found that all measured differences had D-values that exceeded an absolute value of 4, which qualifies as a very large effect. For experiments using zebrafish larvae as one biological replicate, a minimum of 20 larvae were used. The number of biological replicates and larvae used for each specific experiment as well as the statistical test used to calculate significance is indicated in the figure legends. For statistical analysis, p-values are indicated in the figures. Comparisons were conducted to determine significant differences between control and experimental conditions. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10. The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test and visualized with quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots. Homogeneity of variance between groups was evaluated using F-tests. Based on these preliminary analyses, Student’s T-test, T-test with Welch’s correction, or Mann-Whitney test were selected for subsequent statistical comparisons, as indicated in the figure legends. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Processing and method analysis of the bulk RNAseq dataset is described below in the Materials and Methods section.

Fish lines and developmental conditions

The following transgenic lines have been used in this study: Tg(mpeg1.1:mCherry) [52], Tg(mnx1:mCherry) [53], and Tg(gfap:gfp) [54], Tg(ubi:Lox-stop-Lox-atrogin1), Tg(503unc:creERT2) and Tg(murf1a:gfp). Embryos were raised and staged according to standard protocols [51]. For imaging analysis, larvae were fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde/1xPBS, after which they were dehydrated through an ethanol series and stored at −20°C until use.

Plasmid construction and transgenic line establishment

For generation of Tg(ubi:Lox-stop-Lox-atrogin1) zebrafish, a p5E entry vector containing the ubiquitin promoter and the loxP cassette [24] was used. The atrogin-1 ORF was amplified by PCR from zebrafish cDNA and cloned in the pME middle-entry vector. Generation of the Tg(503unc:creERT2) was perfomed using the small 503unc skeletal-muscle-specific promoter [23] and the creERT2 coding sequence [25].

For generation of Tg(murf1a:gfp) zebrafish, we cloned 5kb of the murf1a gene promoter in the p5E entry clone and used the pME-gfp plasmid as middle-entry vector.

The appropriate entry and middle-entry clones were mixed with the SV40pA 3’ entry vector and recombined into the Tol2 transposon destination vector. To establish stable transgenic lines, plasmids were injected into one-cell-stage embryos with Tol2 transposase mRNA [22].

Pharmacological treatments

Stock solution of 1-phenyl 2-thiourea (PTU; Sigma) was prepared at 25X (0.075%). PTU 1X working solution was used to inhibit pigmentation in zebrafish embryos. A stock solution of hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT; Sigma) was prepared at 10 mM in 100% DMSO (Sigma). For induction of Atrogin-1 expression, zebrafish larvae were treated at a concentration of 10 µM.

Gene-expression analysis

HCR-RNA fish were performed using atrogin-1, pdgfrb or mpeg1.2 probes designed by Molecular Instruments, and in situ hybridization and revelation were performed following the provider protocol.

Total RNA samples for bulk RNAseq analysis were prepared with ~50 larvae/sample. Each experimental condition was performed using biological quadruplicates to ensure reproducibility. Trizol (Invitrogen) was used to homogenize cellular extracts with the TissueLyzer (Qiagen). RNA purification was performed as described above. For bulk RNAseq analysis, library preparation and sequencing were carried out by NovoGene using the Illumina NGS platform. Raw FASTQ sequencing data underwent preprocessing to filter out adapters, poly-N tails, and low-quality reads. Indexing and alignment were performed using HISAT2 (v2.0.5) [55] against the GRCz11 (Danio rerio) reference genome obtained from Ensembl. Mapped reads were assembled using StringTie (v1.3.3b) [56], and quantification was performed using FeatureCounts (v1.5.0-p3) [57]. Differential expression analysis was conducted in the R environment using DeSeq2 [58], and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed using clusterProfiler [59]. All visualizations were generated using ggplot2. RNAseq data are available via the GEO database and the accession number GSE274353.

To map the effects of cortisol exposure to cell and tissue type we used the procedure reported previously [60]. Briefly, we used a published single-cell atlas of zebrafish development [61], reducing the atlas to the data from 5 dpf embryos. The 5dpf data was reclustered and marker genes identified, using Seurat v5 [62,63]. Probable cell types within the clusters were identified by matching the annotations from the full embryo atlas to the 5 dpf single-cell data. Cortisol and matched control bulk RNAseq data sets (GEO records GSE80221 and GSE144885), and quantified using the Nextflow NF-core/rnaseq pipeline (v 3.12.0 for GSE144885 data and v 3.14.0 for GSE80221 data), using the Ensembl release 110 annotations of the Zebrafish GRCz11 genome assembly. The subsequent expression matrixes were joined and converted to rlog values using DESeq2 version 1.26.1 (DESeq2) [58]. The rlog matrixes were normalized on a gene-by-gene basis, by subtracting the gene-specific average and dividing by the gene-specific standard deviation. The resulting Z-transformed matrix was subjected to Principal Components analysis using SAS JMP version 18.0.1 for Mac OS. Inspection of the PCA in conjunction with metadata (experiment, treatment, replicate) indicated that Principal Component 5 captured the response to cortisol. The loading vector for this PC was reduced to only those genes that were identified as cell cluster markers as described above, and the plot of PC5 loading was also generated using JMP.

Cortisol level analysis

Zebrafish larvae were treated with 10 μM hydroxytamoxifen from 5 to 6 dpf. At either 6 dpf or 8 dpf, samples of 30 larvae each were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for 3 minutes and stored at -80°C until analysis. Cortisol levels were measured using the Cortisol ELISA kit (Neogen - 402710). For sample preparation, zebrafish larvae were lysed, homogenized, and resuspended in 250 μL extraction buffer. 200 μL of the homogenate was transferred to a glass tube and mixed with 1 mL of Ethyl Acetate by vortexing for 30 seconds. After phase separation, the upper phase was transferred to a new glass tube and evaporated under nitrogen (N2) stream. The dried sample was reconstituted in 200 μL extraction buffer and assayed immediately following the procedures detailed in the Neogen Cortisol ELISA Kit manual.

Locomotion (larvae) and swimming (adults) analysis

Larvae were treated with hydroxytamoxifen or DMSO at 10 μM from 5 dpf to 7 dpf, or from 5 to 6 dpf followed by multiple washes with fresh water to remove chemicals. Individual larvae were placed in 24- or 48-well plates containing 500 μL of medium. Locomotion assays were performed using Zebrabox and recorded using Viewpoint quantization software. Parameters used were: threshold 19, freezing 5, and burst 6, with data integration every 4 hours. A backlight (20%) and toplight (3%) were activated during the assay. Total locomotive activity per 4-hour period was calculated by summing small burst movements and comparing them with freezing activity. Maximum values did not exceed 14,400 seconds (4 hours) per integration point. Raw data were transformed into percentage of activity and analyzed using GraphPad Prism. Multiple unpaired t-tests with the False Discovery Rate (FDR) method were performed, analyzing mean and variance for each population row. Each data point represents one individual.

Swimming tunnel preparation, calibration, and maintenance were adapted from Burris et al.[64].The swim performance assay was modified to use velocity increments of 5 cm/s every 3 minutes for a total duration of 60min, with fish size positioned at 3 cm in length and an average of 5 zebrafish swimming simultaneously in the swimming chamber. This group size was selected to avoid conflict between zebrafish while enabling accurate recording of swimming performance for each individual fish. Before starting the performance assay, zebrafish were acclimated for 15min in the swimming chamber with a velocity of 30 cm/s. Significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. Error bars represent s.d.

Beating heart analysis

Samples were mounted with 1.2% low-melting agarose in a petri dish 35 mm in diameter, with a glass bottom. Images were acquired using a Spinning-disk confocal unit (CSU-W1, Yokogawa, Japan) on a Nikon inverted Ti-Eclipse microscope stand (Nikon Instruments Inc., Japan), equipped with an objective magnification 20x and numerical aperture (NA) of 0.75, immersion medium Air (dry). For live imaging experiments, the sample was placed into a Stagetop Incubator System (Okolab srl, Italy) and warmed at 28°C using the Heated Chamber for Nikon Motorized Stage (H301-NIKON-Ti-S-ER, Okolab srl, Italy). Images were collected every 15ms, using an exposure time of 10ms for a total duration of 1 minute. To count heartbeats, the Z-plot axis was used and peaks were counted manually. Significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. Error bars represent s.d.

Heart volume analysis

Samples were mounted with 1.2% low-melting agarose in a petri dish 35 mm in diameter, on top of agarose drops. Images were acquired using a point scanning confocal unit (LSM 980, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany) with a 20x magnification and NA of 1.00 objective lens with water immersion medium (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany). For 3D reconstruction, images were 4091*4006 pixels acquired at 8-bit controlled with Zen Blue 3.1 software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany). 124 μm Z-stack images were collected with a step size of 1 μm with the Motorized Scanning Stage 130x85 PIEZO (432022-9903-000, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany). Significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. Error bars represent s.d.

Blood flow analysis

Samples were mounted with 1.2% low-melting agarose in a petri dish 35 mm in diameter, with a glass bottom. Images were acquired using a Spinning-disk confocal unit (CSU-W1, Yokogawa, Japan) on a Nikon inverted Ti-Eclipse microscope stand (Nikon Instruments Inc., Japan), equipped with an objective magnification 20x, numerical aperture (NA) of 0.75, immersion medium Air (dry). Samples were imaged using DIC microscopy. Images were acquired in 2048*2048 pixels, 16-bit with a Scientific CMOS Zyla 4.2 (AndorTechnology, United Kingdom) controlled with NIS AR 5.41.02 software (build 1711, Nikon Instruments Inc., Japan). Samples were placed into a Stagetop Incubator System (Okolabsrl, Italy), warmed at 28°C using the Heated Chamber, and images were collected every 500 ms for a total duration of 10 sec. Significance is determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. Error bars represent s.d.

Immunostaining

Immunostaining was performed using anti-GFP (1/1,000, Torrey Pines Biolabs), anti-DsRed (1/500, Takara), anti-HuC/D (1/500, Invitrogen), anti-znp1 (1/50, DSHB), anti-zn8 (1/50, DSHB), anti-F310 (1/50, DSHB), anti-A4.1025 (1/50, DSHB), anti-SV2 (1/50, DSHB), and anti-acetylated tubulin (1/500, Sigma) as primary antibodies and Alexa 488, Alexa 555, or Alexa 647-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) or goat anti-mouse IgG (1/1,000) as secondary antibodies (Invitrogen). Phalloidin-Alexa 488 was used to bind actin and reveal muscle fibers (Invitrogen).

Niel red and Sirius red stainings

Niel red was used at 0.25mg/ml (0.75 mM) in 0.4% acetone for 30 min on larvae freshly euthanized with tricaine. Larvae were then washed 4 times with PBS tween 0.1% and mounted in glycerol for fluorescent imaging. Sirius red was used at 0.1% in picric acid for 60 min on fixed larvae. Larvae were then washed 4 times with 0.5% citric acid and mounted in glycerol for birefringence imaging.

Tissue Clearing

Tissue clearing was adapted from Pende et al., [45]. Fish were euthanized in ice for 5min and then dehydrated gradually with ethanol and stored until use. Before clearing, fish were rehydrated in 0.1% PBS-Tween and meticulously skinned, and were then placed in 3% H2O2 solution for 10min to increase depigmentation efficiency. Fish were then incubated in Solution 1 (25% urea, 5% Triton-100x, 5% Chaps) for 5h at 37ºC under gentle agitation. Then fish were gradually dehydrated using 50% Tert-butanol/4% PBS-Quadrol; 75% Tert-butanol/4% PBS-Quadrol, overnight at 37ºC; 80% 1-propanol/4% dH2O-Quadrol, overnight at 4ºC; 90% 1-propanol/4% dH2O-Quadrol, overnight at 4ºC; and 100% 1-propanol, overnight at 4ºC. Each step was performed under gentle agitation. For final RI matching fish were then immersed in sDBE consisting of DBE which was first purified with aluminiumoxde and subsequently stabilized with 0.3% propyl gallate.

Image acquisition

Images were acquired using either a widefield Zeiss AxioImager M2 Upright microscope (430004-9902-000, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany), a Zeiss Axio Observer.Z1 inverted microscope (431007-9902-000, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany) or a point scanning confocal unit (LSM 980, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany) on a Zeiss Axio Examiner Z1 upright microscope stand (409000-9752-000, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany), as indicated in figure legends.

For birefringence analysis, we used a Polarizer D (000000-1121-813, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany) and a LD condenser (424244-0000-000, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany).

For light-sheet microscopy, images were acquired using a mesoSPIM light-sheet microscope [46] equipped with a MI Plan 4.0X/ 0.35 Air objective lens (Ref: 130-133-602). The images underwent modifications using Fiji software. To ensure consistency in image processing, a macro was devised in collaboration with our team and the Light Microscopy Facility at MDIBL and will be made available upon request.

3D reconstruction and segmentation

Zebrafish larvae.

To analyze atrogin-1 expression, we imaged larvae using a Zeiss LSM980 confocal microscope. Three-dimensional reconstruction was performed using Imaris software. Volumes of atrogin-1 expression were reconstructed and segmented using the Surfaces module in Imaris. The following parameters were applied: surface detail of 0.0529 μm with background subtraction (local contrast) using a 1.98-μm-diameter sphere. An intensity threshold of 200 and a surface filter of 100 were applied. The “Center point” surface style was selected for optimal rendering. Motoneurons were reconstructed and segmented using the Surfaces module in Imaris. Different parameters were applied for each anatomical component. Spinal cord segmentation: Surface detail of 2 μm with absolute intensity thresholding was applied. An intensity threshold of 3054, minimum volume of 5 μm³, and surface filter above 6000 were used. Axons and NMJ segmentation: Surface detail of 0.2 μm with background subtraction (local contrast) using a 1.98-μm-diameter sphere was applied. An intensity threshold of 375 and surface filter above 15 were used. Two classifications were defined at a threshold of 607 to distinguish NMJs from axons. Visualization and correction: Each anatomical component was isolated and assigned unique color labels: white (spinal cord), red (axons), magenta (NMJs) and yellow (immune cells). Auto-prediction was used to identify different motoneuron components, followed by manual segmentation correction to ensure accurate assignment. Morphometric analysis: Branching patterns were obtained using the Filaments module in Imaris with the soma, branching, and spine model. Soma were defined with an average diameter of 13.2 μm, and segments were set to range between 0.2 and 8 μm. The segment threshold was set at 100. No training data were applied. Quantitative data were extracted from the Statistics module and analyzed using GraphPad Prism. Statistical significance was determined as described in the Statistical Analysis section of the Materials and Methods and Figure legends.

Adult zebrafish.

Fish were imaged using MesoSPIM light-sheet microscopy with both right and left lasers to increase accuracy of the final image, followed by 3D reconstruction using Amira software. Reconstruction of the 3D image required superposition and alignment of both right and left laser images. For alignment, both files were loaded and colored with two high-contrast colors (green and magenta) in the ‘project’ window. Three easily identifiable structures were selected, and one channel was moved along the x, y, and z axes until structures in both images matched. Following alignment, images were reoriented so that the longitudinal section of the fish could be easily visualized on an x-y axis. While optional, this latter step increased efficiency during segmentation of focal injuries in the fish trunk. Volume was reconstructed by creating a mask of GFP-positive tissue and was adjusted manually to correct for autofluorescent structures such as the spinal cord, aorta, and caudal vein. The histogram range obtained from the control reconstruction was used to reconstruct atrofish uninjured reconstructed volume, with manual adjustments as needed. For segmentation, each section was divided into interior (GFP-positive tissue) and exterior (GFP-negative) materials. Individual injuries were isolated and assigned unique color labels. Auto-selection was used for clearly defined injuries not connected to the exterior material, while manual segmentation was performed for open injuries. Videos were extracted from Amira software using Camera Orbit, Animation Director, and Volume Rendering modules and exported as.AVI files at a rate of 25 fps. Snapshots were extracted using Volume Rendering and Snapshot modules, and were exported as.PNG files. Volumes were extracted from the ‘Material Statistics’ module and uploaded to GraphPad Prism for statistical analysis. The significance of injury volumes and location were determined by t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. Error bars represent s.d.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Proteolysis, inflammation, stress response and apoptosis processes are affected in the atrofish.

(A) Schematic representation of the method used to validate Tg(503unc:creERT2) transgenic line with the Tg(ubi:switch) transgene. Efficient recombination of the loxP sites following 4-OHT treatment leads to mCherry expression in muscle fibers. (B) Quantification of proportion of the different phenotypes, as measured via phalloidin incorporation, observed in atrofish larvae treated with DMSO (n = 29), and after 24 (n = 29), 48 (n = 28), or 72 (n = 34) hours of 4-OHT treatment. Significance is determined by contingency Fisher’s exact test. (C) GO (Gene Ontology) analysis between control atrofish larvae (DMSO-treated) and atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours. (D) KEGG analysis between control atrofish larvae (DMSO-treated) and atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours. Error bars represent s.d.

(TIF)

pgen.1012019.s001.tif (28.9MB, tif)
S2 Fig. Inflammation, fat deposition, gliosis, and fibrosis in the atrofish.

Confocal projections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (top) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 48 hours (bottom) at 6 dpf. (A) The number of macrophages was quantified using the mpeg1:mCherry transgenic line (DMSO; n = 13 and 4-OHT; n = 10). (B) Fat deposition was analyzed using Nile red incorporation (DMSO; n = 20 and 4-OHT; n = 20). Statistical significance is determined by multiple t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. Error bars represent s.d. (C) Representative picture of Sirius red staining to analyze collagen deposition in skeletal muscle tissue. (D) Representative images of gfap:gfp expression. GFAP expression was analyzed using the gfap:gfp transgenic line. (E) Representative image of pdgfrb expression. pdgfrb expression was analyzed using HCR fluorescent in situ hybridization. Scale bars: 100 μm.

(TIF)

pgen.1012019.s002.tif (30.4MB, tif)
S3 Fig. Myosin light chain expression in fast-twitch muscle fibers, but not myosin heavy-chain expression, is affected in the atrofish.

(A) Apotome sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 72 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing reduced F310 immunolabelling (purple) in trunk skeletal muscles. (B) Apotome sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 72 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing reduced F310 immunolabelling (purple) in trunk skeletal muscles in combination with dark-field imaging revealing the shape of the skin, myotomes, and notochord. (C) Quantification of proportion of the different phenotypes observed in DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (n = 33) or atrofish larvae after 24 (n = 36), 48 (n = 32), or 72 (n = 28) hours of 4-OHT treatment, with phalloidin incorporation and F310 immunostaining. Significance is determined by contingency Fisher’s exact test exact. (D) Confocal sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (top) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours (bottom) at 6 dpf showing phalloidin incorporation (green), A4.1025 (purple) and F310 (cyan) immunolabelling in trunk skeletal muscles. White arrow shows phalloidin incorporation in the absence of F310 expression but presence of A4.1025 expression. Asterisks show sites of muscle-fiber degeneration. Scale bars: 100 μm.

(TIF)

pgen.1012019.s003.tif (33.5MB, tif)
S4 Fig. Survival of spinal neurons, but not of dorsal root ganglia, is affected in the atrofish.

(A) Apotome sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 48 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing reduced acetylated tubulin (purple) and A4.1025 (green) immunolabelling in trunk skeletal muscles. Asterisks show sites of muscle-fiber degeneration. (B) Quantification of proportion of the different phenotypes observed in DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (n = 32) or atrofish larvae after 24 (n = 38), 48 (n = 35), or 72 (n = 32) hours of 4-OHT treatment, with HuC/D immunostaining showing spinal neurons. Significance is determined by contingency Fisher’s exact test exact. (C) Confocal sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing phalloidin incorporation (green), HuC/D (purple), and SV2 (cyan) immunolabelling in trunk skeletal muscles. Bottom row shows phalloidin, HuC/D, and SV2 staining in the central region of the trunk muscles shown in the top row. (D) Apotome sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 72 hours (middle and right) at 6 dpf showing reduced HuC/D (purple) and A4.1025 (green) immunolabelling in trunk skeletal muscles. Asterisks show sites of muscle-fiber and spinal-neuron degeneration. Dorsal root ganglia in the peripheral nervous system (top arrow) and neurons in the gut (bottom arrow) are not affected by muscle degeneration. Scale bars: 100 μm.

(TIF)

pgen.1012019.s004.tif (38.1MB, tif)
S5 Fig. Atrofish larvae and adults differ in their capacity for recovery.

(A) GO (Gene Ontology) between atrofish larvae treated with DMSO for 24 hours and atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours, with all larvae then placed in chemical-free medium for 48 hours until 8 dpf. (B) KEGG analysis between atrofish larvae treated with DMSO for 24 hours and atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours, with all larvae then placed in chemical-free medium for 48 hours until 8 dpf. (C) Schematic representation of injury locations and distribution (distribution = number of injuries in a particular location as a percentage of the total number of injuries) in control fish (black) and atrofish (red) treated with TAM for 5 months until 6 months of age: ratio of injury size (top), number of injuries (middle), and volume of injuries (bottom) between control and atrofish. The red line separates the different muscle regions of interest for the analysis. (D) Quantification of fish weight in control fish (n = 19) treated with tamoxifen (TAM) or atrofish treated with either DMSO (n = 21) or TAM (n = 21). Statistical significance is determined by Mann-Whitney test, two-tailed, unpaired. (E) Quantification of fish length in TAM-treated control fish (n = 19) or atrofish treated with either DMSO (n = 21) or TAM (n = 21). Statistical significance is determined by Mann-Whitney test, two-tailed, unpaired. (F) Quantification of swimming capacity of control fish and atrofish at 6 months of age, treated with either DMSO (n = 9) or 4-OHT (n = 15) for 5 months, represented by gender. Statistical significance is determined by a Two-way Anova. (G) Quantification of swimming capacity of control fish and atrofish at 9 months of age, treated with TAM for 5 months until 6 months of age, and then treated for with either DMSO (n = 9) or TAM (n = 15) for an additional 3 months (until 9 months of age) to test for recovery of swimming function, represented by gender. Statistical significance is determined by a Two-way Anova. Error bars represent s.d. S5C in S5 Fig: Created in BioRender. Menard, R. (2025) - https://BioRender.com/asky5az.

(TIF)

pgen.1012019.s005.tif (29.6MB, tif)
S1 Table. List of genes dysregulated in the atrofish at 6 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf.

(XLSX)

pgen.1012019.s006.xlsx (751.2KB, xlsx)
S2 Table. List of genes dysregulated in the atrofish at 8 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf, and recovery between 6 and 5 dpf.

(XLSX)

pgen.1012019.s007.xlsx (68.4KB, xlsx)
S1 Movie. Representative 3D reconstruction of the neuromuscular system of control larvae at 6 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf.

(MP4)

Download video file (79.6MB, mp4)
S2 Movie. Representative 3D reconstruction of the neuromuscular system of atrofish larvae at 6 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf.

(MP4)

Download video file (62.1MB, mp4)
S3 Movie. Representative movie of swimming capacity of 4-OHT-treated larvae before and during treatment.

(MP4)

Download video file (37.7MB, mp4)
S4 Movie. Representative movie of blood flow in the trunk circulatory system of control larvae at 6 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf.

(GIF)

pgen.1012019.s011.gif (97.1MB, gif)
S5 Movie. Representative movie of blood flow in the trunk circulatory system of atrofish larvae at 6 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf.

(GIF)

pgen.1012019.s012.gif (93.3MB, gif)
S6 Movie. Representative movie of swimming capacity of 4-OHT-treated larvae during recovery following treatment.

(MP4)

Download video file (68.3MB, mp4)

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Mosimann and Balciunas for sharing Tol2 entry vectors, p5E-ubi:Lox-stop-Lox and pME-ERT2CreERT2 respectively, and Dr. Talbot for sharing the Tg(mnx1:mCherry) line.

Data Availability

Data availability. All data, reagents, and genetic tools presented in this manuscript are available to the scientific community, either in a public repository, within the manuscript itself or as supplementary information. The transcriptomics data are publicly available at the GEO database and the accession numbers are GSE274353, GSE80221 and GSE144885.

Funding Statement

o This study was supported by Institutional Development Awards (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant numbers P20GM103423 and P20GM104318 (MDIBL), as well as P20GM144265 and 3P20GM144265-01A1S1 (RM). Additional funding was provided by NIH (R03-HD099468) and Morris Discovery Fund awards to JAC. The National Science Foundation REU program DBI-2243416 supported JD. This work was also funded by grants from the DFG (527098031) and National Institute of Health (ORIP-R21OD031971) awarded to PM. EM, CD and JPP are supported by ANR grant (ANR-21-CE14-0054-02), the Inspire Program (Region Occitanie, France - Reference number:1901175) and Fondation pour la recherche médicale (DEQ20180339226). The IHU HealthAge was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the France 2030 program (reference number: ANR 23 IAHU 0011). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Cao L, Morley JE. Sarcopenia is recognized as an independent condition by an international classification of disease, tenth revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM) code. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(8):675–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sun N, Youle RJ, Finkel T. The mitochondrial basis of aging. Mol Cell. 2016;61(5):654–66. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chakkalakal JV, Jones KM, Basson MA, Brack AS. The aged niche disrupts muscle stem cell quiescence. Nature. 2012;490(7420):355–60. doi: 10.1038/nature11438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sousa-Victor P, García-Prat L, Serrano AL, Perdiguero E, Muñoz-Cánoves P. Muscle stem cell aging: regulation and rejuvenation. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2015;26(6):287–96. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2015.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sousa-Victor P, Gutarra S, García-Prat L, Rodriguez-Ubreva J, Ortet L, Ruiz-Bonilla V, et al. Geriatric muscle stem cells switch reversible quiescence into senescence. Nature. 2014;506(7488):316–21. doi: 10.1038/nature13013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tedesco FS, Dellavalle A, Diaz-Manera J, Messina G, Cossu G. Repairing skeletal muscle: regenerative potential of skeletal muscle stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(1):11–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI40373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yanay N, Rabie M, Nevo Y. Impaired regeneration in dystrophic muscle-new target for therapy. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:69. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.00069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rossi G, Messina G. Comparative myogenesis in teleosts and mammals. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71(16):3081–99. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1604-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ruparelia AA, Ratnayake D, Currie PD. Stem cells in skeletal muscle growth and regeneration in amniotes and teleosts: Emerging themes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2020;9(2):e365. doi: 10.1002/wdev.365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kishi S, Bayliss PE, Uchiyama J, Koshimizu E, Qi J, Nanjappa P, et al. The identification of zebrafish mutants showing alterations in senescence-associated biomarkers. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(8):e1000152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Daya A, Donaka R, Karasik D. Zebrafish models of sarcopenia. Dis Model Mech. 2020;13(3):dmm042689. doi: 10.1242/dmm.042689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Anchelin M, Alcaraz-Pérez F, Martínez CM, Bernabé-García M, Mulero V, Cayuela ML. Premature aging in telomerase-deficient zebrafish. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6(5):1101–12. doi: 10.1242/dmm.011635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lex K, Maia Gil M, Lopes-Bastos B, Figueira M, Marzullo M, Giannetti K, et al. Telomere shortening produces an inflammatory environment that increases tumor incidence in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(26):15066–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920049117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.El Maï M, Bird M, Allouche A, Targen S, Şerifoğlu N, Lopes-Bastos B, et al. Gut-specific telomerase expression counteracts systemic aging in telomerase-deficient zebrafish. Nat Aging. 2023;3(5):567–84. doi: 10.1038/s43587-023-00401-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Henriques CM, Carneiro MC, Tenente IM, Jacinto A, Ferreira MG. Telomerase is required for zebrafish lifespan. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(1):e1003214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carneiro MC, Henriques CM, Nabais J, Ferreira T, Carvalho T, Ferreira MG. Short telomeres in key tissues initiate local and systemic aging in zebrafish. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(1):e1005798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bodine SC, Latres E, Baumhueter S, Lai VK, Nunez L, Clarke BA, et al. Identification of ubiquitin ligases required for skeletal muscle atrophy. Science. 2001;294(5547):1704–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1065874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jagoe RT, Lecker SH, Gomes M, Goldberg AL. Patterns of gene expression in atrophying skeletal muscles: response to food deprivation. FASEB J. 2002;16(13):1697–712. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0312com [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gomes MD, Lecker SH, Jagoe RT, Navon A, Goldberg AL. Atrogin-1, a muscle-specific F-box protein highly expressed during muscle atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(25):14440–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.251541198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gumucio JP, Mendias CL. Atrogin-1, MuRF-1, and sarcopenia. Endocrine. 2013;43(1):12–21. doi: 10.1007/s12020-012-9751-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ruparelia AA, Montandon M, Merriner J, Huang C, Wong SFL, Sonntag C, et al. Atrogin-1 promotes muscle homeostasis by regulating levels of endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP. JCI Insight. 2024;9(8):e167578. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.167578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kwan KM, Fujimoto E, Grabher C, Mangum BD, Hardy ME, Campbell DS, et al. The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev Dyn. 2007;236(11):3088–99. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Berger J, Currie PD. 503unc, a small and muscle-specific zebrafish promoter. Genesis. 2013;51(6):443–7. doi: 10.1002/dvg.22385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mosimann C, Kaufman CK, Li P, Pugach EK, Tamplin OJ, Zon LI. Ubiquitous transgene expression and Cre-based recombination driven by the ubiquitin promoter in zebrafish. Development. 2011;138(1):169–77. doi: 10.1242/dev.059345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Akerberg AA, Stewart S, Stankunas K. Spatial and temporal control of transgene expression in zebrafish. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bhagwandin VJ, Hau LW-T, Mallen-St Clair J, Wolters PJ, Caughey GH. Structure and activity of human pancreasin, a novel tryptic serine peptidase expressed primarily by the pancreas. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(5):3363–71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209353200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sandri M, Sandri C, Gilbert A, Skurk C, Calabria E, Picard A, et al. Foxo transcription factors induce the atrophy-related ubiquitin ligase atrogin-1 and cause skeletal muscle atrophy. Cell. 2004;117(3):399–412. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00400-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brocca L, Toniolo L, Reggiani C, Bottinelli R, Sandri M, Pellegrino MA. FoxO-dependent atrogenes vary among catabolic conditions and play a key role in muscle atrophy induced by hindlimb suspension. J Physiol. 2017;595(4):1143–58. doi: 10.1113/JP273097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Oyabu M, Takigawa K, Mizutani S, Hatazawa Y, Fujita M, Ohira Y, et al. FOXO1 cooperates with C/EBPδ and ATF4 to regulate skeletal muscle atrophy transcriptional program during fasting. FASEB J. 2022;36(2):e22152. doi: 10.1096/fj.202101385RR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gans I, Hartig EI, Zhu S, Tilden AR, Hutchins LN, Maki NJ, et al. Klf9 is a key feedforward regulator of the transcriptomic response to glucocorticoid receptor activity. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):11415. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68040-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hartig EI, Zhu S, King BL, Coffman JA. Cortisol-treated zebrafish embryos develop into pro-inflammatory adults with aberrant immune gene regulation. Biol Open. 2016;5(8):1134–41. doi: 10.1242/bio.020065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Katsuhara S, Yokomoto-Umakoshi M, Umakoshi H, Matsuda Y, Iwahashi N, Kaneko H, et al. Impact of cortisol on reduction in muscle strength and mass: a mendelian randomization study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(4):e1477–87. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yanagita I, Fujihara Y, Kitajima Y, Tajima M, Honda M, Kawajiri T, et al. A High Serum Cortisol/DHEA-S Ratio Is a Risk Factor for Sarcopenia in Elderly Diabetic Patients. J Endocr Soc. 2019;3(4):801–13. doi: 10.1210/js.2018-00271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schakman O, Kalista S, Barbé C, Loumaye A, Thissen JP. Glucocorticoid-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45(10):2163–72. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.05.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Diago-Galmés A, Guillamón-Escudero C, Tenías-Burillo JM, Soriano JM, Fernández-Garrido J. Salivary testosterone and cortisol as biomarkers for the diagnosis of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in community-dwelling older adults. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(2):93. doi: 10.3390/biology10020093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lokireddy S, Wijesoma IW, Sze SK, McFarlane C, Kambadur R, Sharma M. Identification of atrogin-1-targeted proteins during the myostatin-induced skeletal muscle wasting. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2012;303(5):C512-29. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00402.2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chung SW, Kim J-Y, Yoon JP, Suh DW, Yeo WJ, Lee Y-S. Atrogin1-induced loss of aquaporin 4 in myocytes leads to skeletal muscle atrophy. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71167-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Usui S, Maejima Y, Pain J, Hong C, Cho J, Park JY, et al. Endogenous muscle atrophy F-box mediates pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy through regulation of nuclear factor-kappaB. Circ Res. 2011;109(2):161–71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.238717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mearini G, Gedicke C, Schlossarek S, Witt CC, Krämer E, Cao P, et al. Atrogin-1 and MuRF1 regulate cardiac MyBP-C levels via different mechanisms. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;85(2):357–66. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cisterna BA, Vargas AA, Puebla C, Fernández P, Escamilla R, Lagos CF, et al. Active acetylcholine receptors prevent the atrophy of skeletal muscles and favor reinnervation. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1073. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14063-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bongers KS, Fox DK, Ebert SM, Kunkel SD, Dyle MC, Bullard SA, et al. Skeletal muscle denervation causes skeletal muscle atrophy through a pathway that involves both Gadd45a and HDAC4. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;305(7):E907-15. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00380.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cisterna BA, Cardozo C, Sáez JC. Neuronal involvement in muscular atrophy. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:405. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Muller FL, Song W, Jang YC, Liu Y, Sabia M, Richardson A, et al. Denervation-induced skeletal muscle atrophy is associated with increased mitochondrial ROS production. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007;293(3):R1159-68. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00767.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dudakov JA, Hanash AM, van den Brink MRM. Interleukin-22: immunobiology and pathology. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:747–85. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pende M, Vadiwala K, Schmidbaur H, Stockinger AW, Murawala P, Saghafi S, et al. A versatile depigmentation, clearing, and labeling method for exploring nervous system diversity. Sci Adv. 2020;6(22):eaba0365. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba0365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Voigt FF, Kirschenbaum D, Platonova E, Pagès S, Campbell RAA, Kastli R, et al. The mesoSPIM initiative: open-source light-sheet microscopes for imaging cleared tissue. Nat Methods. 2019;16(11):1105–8. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0554-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dorchies OM, Reutenauer-Patte J, Dahmane E, Ismail HM, Petermann O, Patthey- Vuadens O, et al. The anticancer drug tamoxifen counteracts the pathology in a mouse model of duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am J Pathol. 2013;182(2):485–504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gineste C, Simon A, Braun M, Reiss D, Laporte J. Tamoxifen improves muscle structure and function of Bin1- and Dnm2-related centronuclear myopathies. Brain. 2023;146(7):3029–48. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wu B, Shah SN, Lu P, Bollinger LE, Blaeser A, Sparks S, et al. Long-term treatment of tamoxifen and raloxifene alleviates dystrophic phenotype and enhances muscle functions of FKRP Dystroglycanopathy. Am J Pathol. 2018;188(4):1069–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gayi E, Neff LA, Massana Muñoz X, Ismail HM, Sierra M, Mercier T, et al. Tamoxifen prolongs survival and alleviates symptoms in mice with fatal X-linked myotubular myopathy. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4848. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07058-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203(3):253–310. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002030302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ellett F, Pase L, Hayman JW, Andrianopoulos A, Lieschke GJ. mpeg1 promoter transgenes direct macrophage-lineage expression in zebrafish. Blood. 2011;117(4):e49-56. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-314120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.See K, Yadav P, Giegerich M, Cheong PS, Graf M, Vyas H, et al. SMN deficiency alters Nrxn2 expression and splicing in zebrafish and mouse models of spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(7):1754–70. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bernardos RL, Raymond PA. GFAP transgenic zebrafish. Gene Expr Patterns. 2006;6(8):1007–13. doi: 10.1016/j.modgep.2006.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):907–15. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang T-C, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(3):290–5. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):923–30. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yu G, Wang L-G, Han Y, He Q-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16(5):284–7. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Drepanos L, Gans IM, Grendler J, Guitar S, Fuqua JH, Maki NJ, et al. Loss of Krüppel-like factor 9 deregulates both physiological gene expression and development. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):12239. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39453-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Farnsworth DR, Saunders LM, Miller AC. A single-cell transcriptome atlas for zebrafish development. Dev Biol. 2020;459(2):100–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Satija R, Farrell JA, Gennert D, Schier AF, Regev A. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):495–502. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hao Y, Stuart T, Kowalski MH, Choudhary S, Hoffman P, Hartman A, et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42(2):293–304. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Burris B, Jensen N, Mokalled MH. Assessment of swim endurance and swim behavior in adult zebrafish. J Vis Exp. 2021;(177):10.3791/63240. doi: 10.3791/63240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Pablo Wappner

1 Jun 2025

PGENETICS-D-25-00316

Zebrafish genetic model of neuromuscular degeneration associated with Atrogin-1 expression

PLOS Genetics

Dear Dr. Madelaine,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Genetics. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Genetics's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript within 60 days Jul 31 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosgenetics@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ken M. Cadigan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Genetics

Pablo Wappner

Section Editor

PLOS Genetics

Aimée Dudley

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Anne Goriely

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Journal Requirements:

1) Please ensure that the CRediT author contributions listed for every co-author are completed accurately and in full.

At this stage, the following Authors/Authors require contributions: Romain Menard, Elena Morin, Dexter Morse, Caroline Halluin, Marko Pende, Aissette Baanannou, Janelle Grendler, Heath Fuqua, Jijia Li, Laetitia Lancelot, Jessica Drent, Frédéric Bonnet, Joel H. Graber, Prayag Murawala, Cédric Dray, Jean-Philippe Pradère, James A. Coffman, and Romain Madelaine. Please ensure that the full contributions of each author are acknowledged in the "Add/Edit/Remove Authors" section of our submission form.

The list of CRediT author contributions may be found here: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/s/authorship#loc-author-contributions

2) Please provide an Author Summary. This should appear in your manuscript between the Abstract (if applicable) and the Introduction, and should be 150-200 words long. The aim should be to make your findings accessible to a wide audience that includes both scientists and non-scientists. Sample summaries can be found on our website under Submission Guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/s/submission-guidelines#loc-parts-of-a-submission

3) We do not publish any copyright or trademark symbols that usually accompany proprietary names, eg ©,  ®, or TM  (e.g. next to drug or reagent names). Therefore please remove all instances of trademark/copyright symbols throughout the text, including:

- ® on page: 24.

4) Please upload all main figures as separate Figure files in .tif or .eps format. For more information about how to convert and format your figure files please see our guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/s/figures

5) We notice that your supplementary Figures are included in the manuscript file. Please remove them and upload them with the file type 'Supporting Information'. Please ensure that each Supporting Information file has a legend listed in the manuscript after the references list.

6) Some material included in your submission may be copyrighted. According to PLOSu2019s copyright policy, authors who use figures or other material (e.g., graphics, clipart, maps) from another author or copyright holder must demonstrate or obtain permission to publish this material under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License used by PLOS journals. Please closely review the details of PLOSu2019s copyright requirements here: PLOS Licenses and Copyright. If you need to request permissions from a copyright holder, you may use PLOS's Copyright Content Permission form.

Please respond directly to this email and provide any known details concerning your material's license terms and permissions required for reuse, even if you have not yet obtained copyright permissions or are unsure of your material's copyright compatibility. Once you have responded and addressed all other outstanding technical requirements, you may resubmit your manuscript within Editorial Manager.

Potential Copyright Issues:

i) Please confirm (a) that you are the photographer of 4A, or (b) provide written permission from the photographer to publish the photo(s) under our CC BY 4.0 license.

ii) Figure S4C. Please confirm whether you drew the images / clip-art within the figure panels by hand. If you did not draw the images, please provide (a) a link to the source of the images or icons and their license / terms of use; or (b) written permission from the copyright holder to publish the images or icons under our CC BY 4.0 license. Alternatively, you may replace the images with open source alternatives. See these open source resources you may use to replace images / clip-art:

- https://commons.wikimedia.org

- https://openclipart.org/.

7) In the online submission form, you indicated that "All data, reagents, and genetic tools are available upon request." All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either

1. In a public repository

2. Within the manuscript itself

3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons by return email and your exemption request will be escalated to the editor for approval. Your exemption request will be handled independently and will not hold up the peer review process, but will need to be resolved should your manuscript be accepted for publication. One of the Editorial team will then be in touch if there are any issues.

8) Please ensure that the funders and grant numbers match between the Financial Disclosure field and the Funding Information tab in your submission form. Note that the funders must be provided in the same order in both places as well. Currently, "3P20GM144265-01A1S1" ,"Morris Discovery Fund", "BioMaine association seed", "INSERM", "CNRS", "EFS",  and "Paul Sabatier University" are missing from the Funding Information tab.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Reviewer #1: This study by Menard et al. aims to provide a new model to study sarcopenia in larval zebrafish. Key findings are: (1) the development of a new gain-of-function Atrogin-1 line, specifically in skeletal muscle, (2) loss of both muscle and neurons in the model, and (3) ability of zebrafish to recover from the atrophy. The fact that overexpression of Atrogin-1 causes atrophy is perhaps the most provocative result of this study as mutants of Atrogin-1 also have muscular atrophy. That said, much of the data is primarily descriptive with little mechanistic insight provided. Overall, the problem is important, the topic interesting, but experimental support for the claims is inadequate. Specific concerns are listed below:

1) The authors nicely show that treatment with 4-OHT causes mCherry expression in the muscle fibers and when crossed to the Atrogin-1 fish, a range of muscle atrophy is observed. However, there is no confirmation that Atrogin-1 is consistently upregulated after treatment. Given the range of phenotypes (which can happen with ablation studies but also with imperfect Cre recombination), finding a way to quantify the amount of Atrogin-1 that is overexpressed is critical to evaluate the rest of the paper. This is particularly important as tamoxifen is known to have an effect on muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration in mammalian models.

2) It is not clear why overexpression of Atrogin-1 and knockout of Atrogin-1 would both cause muscular atrophy and increased apoptosis. The authors mention many times a feedback-loop component to this pathway. It would help the reader if a schematic of this feedback loop (known or proposed by the authors) was available. Further, have the authors tried using their overexpression line in the context of the published mutant? Can overexpression of Atrogin-1 rescue the initial atrophy and then additional time/increase concentration of 4-OHT show new development of atrophy? While it may be impractical to generate a double transgenic in the mutant line, a CRISPANT-based approach could get at this without the need to make multiple lines.

3) Sarcopenia is primarily induced (although there are other factors) by changes in muscle synthesis signaling pathways. This leads to increased fat infiltration which can then drive inflammation and reduce strength and activity of the muscles. In Figure 1, the RNAseq suggests inflammation is occurring as cytokines are upregulated. However, there is no further analysis to confirm that the muscle atrophy is modeling sarcopenia (i.e. fat infiltration) and not a cytokine-mediated or inflammation-based atrophy like cachexia. This is critical given the accelerated timeline of the atrophy.

4) The neuronal staining is not compelling. For example, in Figure 2, the authors show that in an atrophied-muscle section, there is a loss of signal in the zn8 staining. But zn8 staining also labels commissural fibers, outer surface of somites, some ganglia and radial glial cells. In SF3, HuC/HuD staining shows a similar absence of staining. However, there is little explanation as to why the staining in the spinal cord is completely missing in just 24-48 hours. It takes time for neurons to die, particularly neurons that are not directly in contact with muscle fibers (sensory tract, interneurons, etc). Given so much of the staining in the spinal cord is gone – could the lack of signal just be due to increased fibrosis or fat infiltration which precludes the antibody from properly staining the spinal tract? This possibility seems even more likely given that HuC/HuD neurons are intact in the sensory bundles across the lateral line, which are also in contact with the atrophied muscle. The zebrafish community has a large number of plasmids and transgenic lines that label motor neurons, interneurons, and other spinal tract cells. Although getting the transgenic overexpression system into the lines may be challenging, plasmid injection would confirm loss of cells without the use of an antibody. Alternatively, staining for neuronal death with apoptosis markers or a using a plasmid-based approach (SecA5) in conjunction with the zn8 antibody at earlier timepoints would make the loss of signal more convincing.

5) The locomotor experiments are not consistent with the staining or each other. In Figure 3, Atrofish 4-OHT have no swimming at the time of treatment (0 hr). 4-OHT takes time to absorb into the larvae and then it takes time for Cre to cause recombination. Why are the transgenic fish already not swimming at the time of 4-OHT application? Are these fish orally gavage or injected with the 4-OHT? There needs to be a timeline of imaging (phallodin staining or the line, whichever is easier) that correlates loss of locomotion with muscle atrophy, and neuronal loss. Otherwise, what is the locomotion reporting on – muscle function or loss of neurons?

6) Similarly, it doesn’t make sense that at the time of washout, the Atrofish 4-OHT swim comparably to DMSO fish. Once recombination with the Cre has occurred, it is permanently overexpressed. It would take the proliferation of cells that didn’t recombine to stop the overexpression of Atrogin-1. Other larval studies with SMA, ALS, and SCI models, show it takes >24 hr for motor neurons to regenerate in 6 dpf larvae. Even if no axons that project from the brain were damaged, without the proper CPG patterning, normal free swim would not be possible within the timeframe of 4-OHT metabolism. Do the larvae exhibit different movements as compensatory actions?

Reviewer #2: This manuscript introduces and characterizes transgenic zebrafish lines (Atrofish) that conditionally overexpress the ubiquitin ligase Atrogin-1 in muscles. The authors show that this system effectively induces muscle degeneration in larvae and adults. Their characterization suggests that inflammation is induced by muscle degeneration in Atrofish larvae, myosin light chain is affected by Atrogin-1 overexpression, muscle degeneration causes non-autonomous neuronal defects in larvae, larvae can recover from Atrogei-1-induced injury, and Atrofish can be used to cause degenerative phenotypes in adults.

This model could be used to further investigate the function of Atrogin-1, and is valuable as a model for characterizing and developing treatments for muscle degeneration. The data presented are shown clearly and, for the most part, analyzed appropriately. Additional analyses, however, would strengthen the manuscript by providing a more thorough characterization, making the model more valuable. Suggestions for further analyses are described below. Not all should be necessary for publication, but each could clarify the phenotypes observed.

Major comments:

1. Transcriptional analyses suggests an increase in inflammation in Atrofish. This is an interesting observation, and suggests that the immune system may play a role in the Atrofish phenotype. Further insight into this idea could be provided by imaging innate immune cells (macrophages and neutrophils) in relation to muscle damage. This can be done in zebrafish relatively easily with stains or immunostaining, or even better, with live imaging of macrophage reporter lines that could be followed in live animals during degeneration.

2. By staining with F310, the authors show that loss of myosin light chain accompanies muscle atrophy, and suggest that loss of myosin light chain may precede overt disruption of muscle fibers, as imaged with Phalloidin. This conclusion is based on the observation that in a small number of cases (<10% with 1-day OHT exposures, according to Figure S2C) F310 staining is impaired without obvious loss of phalloidin staining. For this argument to be more convincing, the authors should perform a time-course, which, if there conclusion is correct, may demonstrate that F310 is lost earlier after exposure than phalloidin staining is lost. (The most convincing way to test the role of myosin light chain in degeneration, which may be beyond the scope of this report, would be to determine if overexpression of the light chain in Atrofish delays muscle degeneration.)

3. The observation that motor neurons are affected non-autonomously in Atrofish is interesting, but this observation could be presented more clearly and quantified better. For example, the defects in motor neurons are difficult to see in Figure 2C with the znp-1 and zn-8 staining. Higher magnification/higher resolution images could help, as well as tracing and quantification of axon length and synapse density. Using a transgenic line that labels motor neurons clearly would be a better way to characterize motor axons. Finally, a time course quantifying axon degeneration over time after Atrogen-1 induction, relative to muscle degeneration, would be most convincing.

4. The loss of staining for neurons throughout an entire segment of the spinal cord (Fig S3C) is surprising and could be exciting, but staining with HuC/D is not the best way to appreciate this phenotype. Loss of staining for this antigen may not be equivalent to loss of neurons. Staining for cell death and/or using a transgenic line to label all neurons would provide insight. It’s hard to imagine how all the neurons in a part of the spinal cord could die, but one possibility is that inflammation in that region is killing neurons and/or impeding staining. Imaging macrophages and microglia, as suggested in point 1 above, could address this possibility.

5. The recovery experiments are surprising. Data previously presented in the manuscript shows that 5-OHT treatment, even for 24 hours, leads to cellular damage of muscles and neurons. Yet, if I understand the data correctly, immediately after removing fish from 5-OHT they behave completely normally (Figure 3B). This does not seem likely to be enough time to repair cellular damage (i.e., activate stem cells to make new muscle fibers, regrow MN axons and synapses). Transcriptional analyses are insufficient to characterize this “recovery” process. Staining for muscle and motorneurons at mulutiple timepoints is necessary to understand this process. The best way to do this experiment would be with a transgenic reporter that labels muscles, so that atrophy and recovery could be monitored longitudinally in live fish.

Minor comment:

1. For the analysis of muscle fibers presented in Figure 1B, the specific criteria distinguishing mild and strong phenotypes should be described.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy , and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: No: I may have missed the excel sheets for all the numerical data but I did not see them attached

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: Yes: Karen Mruk

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

Figure resubmission:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. If there are other versions of figure files still present in your submission file inventory at resubmission, please replace them with the PACE-processed versions.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors of applicable studies deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Pablo Wappner

19 Nov 2025

PGENETICS-D-25-00316R1

Zebrafish genetic model of neuromuscular degeneration associated with Atrogin-1 expression

PLOS Genetics

Dear Dr. Madelaine,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Genetics. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Genetics's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 18 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosgenetics@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ken M. Cadigan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Genetics

Pablo Wappner

Section Editor

PLOS Genetics

Aimée Dudley

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Anne Goriely

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Additional Editor Comments:

Considering the comments of reviewer 2, you do not have to address the time course that they propose (comment #2). But I think comments 1 and 3 are important - including controls that 4-OHT and DMSO by themselves or in combination do not affect your data seems an important point, especially regarding your surprising recovery data. Please also consider comment #4 and whether removing the Zn8 would be acceptable.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The authors present a new genetic model for muscular atrophy using overexpression of atrogin-1 as a driver for accelerated muscular atrophy. The authors have added new live imaging studies which strengthen their conclusions. I am in favor of publication.

Reviewer #2: This revised manuscript describes a zebrafish model of Atrogen-mediated muscle degeneration. The authors have revised the manuscript with additional experiments, analyses, and text revisions. The authors have not been able to answer all reviewer comments, but they have carried out the most feasible suggestions and met the reviewer comments halfway.

Key revisions that have improved the manuscript include better quantification of Atrogin-1 expression level increases in Atrofish, staining for fat infiltration, using a motor neuron transgenic line to better appreciate motor neuron degeneration, and using a transgenic line and in situ hybridization to assess the role of macrophages in inflammation. In particular, the use of the motor neuron line has improved the characterization of the motor neuron degeneration phenotype.

Notwithstanding the improvements to the manuscript, a few concerns remain that the authors should address more directly, at least with additional discussion.

1. The explanation for the quick recovery of swimming behavior after 4-OHT removal is unsatisfying. If it is not a regenerative response that repairs damage, then how would this work? Is it that the 4-OHT is toxic and somehow synergizes with degeneration in Atrofish?

The explanation for this result in the text is inadequate. Perhaps I’m missing something, but I do not understand what the authors mean when they write that “preventing atrogin-1 overexpression [presumably by removing 4-OHT] in muscle fibers allows for an efficient return to a homeostatic and functional state.” How would removing 4-OHT prevent overexpression? Presumably the Cre recombination has already taken place and overexpression is continuing.

Since this is a confusing section of the manuscript, the authors should discuss a plausible explanation for interpreting this “recovery” result. In the absence of a feasible interpretation, this finding is not meaningful and could be misleading--if that is the case, the authors should consider removing it from the manuscript.

2. The evidence suggesting that loss of mlc precedes muscle degeneration remains relatively weak without a time course experiment. I appreciate that a longitudinal experiment is not feasible to do in live animals, but the authors could do a time-course by staining batches of animals at different time-points after induction to determine if there are early time points when there are more mlc-negative, intact muscles. Alternatively, since this isn’t a critical point in the paper, it would be acceptable for the authors to discuss this result more equivocally.

3. The authors sometimes appear to be using 4-OHT in wildtype animals as a control, sometimes use DMSO with Atrofish as a control, and sometimes use both controls. It is not clear why they chose to use different controls in different experiments, but the results are strongest when both controls are used. In particular, it would be reassuring to see the 4-OHT/WT control for the motor neuron/spinal cord degeneration experiments, rather than just the DMSO/Atrofish control. This would rule out the possibility that the hormone is detrimental to neurons.

4. It is not clear how to reconcile the data in S2A showing no changes in macrophages in the transgenic line with the HCR data showing an increase in the macrophage transcript mpeg (Figure 3C). This discrepancy should be discussed.

5. The Zn8 staining in Figure 2 is very grainy and looks like much of it may be background staining. This staining is less clear than zn8 staining I’ve seen in other papers, suggesting that there may be a problem with the authors’ batch of antibody. Since the znp-1 staining and transgenically labeled motor neurons make the same point, this zn8 staining adds little to the manuscript and could probably be removed.

Minor point:

1. What are the yellow blobs in the 3D reconstructions shown in Figure 3B? They are not explained in the text or figure legend.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy , and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: Yes: Karen Mruk

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

Figure resubmission:

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors of applicable studies deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 2

Pablo Wappner

31 Dec 2025

Dear Dr Madelaine,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Zebrafish genetic model of neuromuscular degeneration associated with Atrogin-1 expression" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional acceptance, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about making your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Ken M. Cadigan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Genetics

Pablo Wappner

Section Editor

PLOS Genetics

Aimée Dudley

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Anne Goriely

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

BlueSky: @plos.bsky.social

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository . As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website .

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly:

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-25-00316R2

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy  requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org .

Acceptance letter

Pablo Wappner

PGENETICS-D-25-00316R2

Zebrafish genetic model of neuromuscular degeneration associated with Atrogin-1 expression

Dear Dr Madelaine,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Zebrafish genetic model of neuromuscular degeneration associated with Atrogin-1 expression" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

For Research Articles, you will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Anita Estes

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Proteolysis, inflammation, stress response and apoptosis processes are affected in the atrofish.

    (A) Schematic representation of the method used to validate Tg(503unc:creERT2) transgenic line with the Tg(ubi:switch) transgene. Efficient recombination of the loxP sites following 4-OHT treatment leads to mCherry expression in muscle fibers. (B) Quantification of proportion of the different phenotypes, as measured via phalloidin incorporation, observed in atrofish larvae treated with DMSO (n = 29), and after 24 (n = 29), 48 (n = 28), or 72 (n = 34) hours of 4-OHT treatment. Significance is determined by contingency Fisher’s exact test. (C) GO (Gene Ontology) analysis between control atrofish larvae (DMSO-treated) and atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours. (D) KEGG analysis between control atrofish larvae (DMSO-treated) and atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours. Error bars represent s.d.

    (TIF)

    pgen.1012019.s001.tif (28.9MB, tif)
    S2 Fig. Inflammation, fat deposition, gliosis, and fibrosis in the atrofish.

    Confocal projections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (top) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 48 hours (bottom) at 6 dpf. (A) The number of macrophages was quantified using the mpeg1:mCherry transgenic line (DMSO; n = 13 and 4-OHT; n = 10). (B) Fat deposition was analyzed using Nile red incorporation (DMSO; n = 20 and 4-OHT; n = 20). Statistical significance is determined by multiple t-test, two-tailed, unpaired. Error bars represent s.d. (C) Representative picture of Sirius red staining to analyze collagen deposition in skeletal muscle tissue. (D) Representative images of gfap:gfp expression. GFAP expression was analyzed using the gfap:gfp transgenic line. (E) Representative image of pdgfrb expression. pdgfrb expression was analyzed using HCR fluorescent in situ hybridization. Scale bars: 100 μm.

    (TIF)

    pgen.1012019.s002.tif (30.4MB, tif)
    S3 Fig. Myosin light chain expression in fast-twitch muscle fibers, but not myosin heavy-chain expression, is affected in the atrofish.

    (A) Apotome sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 72 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing reduced F310 immunolabelling (purple) in trunk skeletal muscles. (B) Apotome sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 72 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing reduced F310 immunolabelling (purple) in trunk skeletal muscles in combination with dark-field imaging revealing the shape of the skin, myotomes, and notochord. (C) Quantification of proportion of the different phenotypes observed in DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (n = 33) or atrofish larvae after 24 (n = 36), 48 (n = 32), or 72 (n = 28) hours of 4-OHT treatment, with phalloidin incorporation and F310 immunostaining. Significance is determined by contingency Fisher’s exact test exact. (D) Confocal sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (top) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours (bottom) at 6 dpf showing phalloidin incorporation (green), A4.1025 (purple) and F310 (cyan) immunolabelling in trunk skeletal muscles. White arrow shows phalloidin incorporation in the absence of F310 expression but presence of A4.1025 expression. Asterisks show sites of muscle-fiber degeneration. Scale bars: 100 μm.

    (TIF)

    pgen.1012019.s003.tif (33.5MB, tif)
    S4 Fig. Survival of spinal neurons, but not of dorsal root ganglia, is affected in the atrofish.

    (A) Apotome sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 48 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing reduced acetylated tubulin (purple) and A4.1025 (green) immunolabelling in trunk skeletal muscles. Asterisks show sites of muscle-fiber degeneration. (B) Quantification of proportion of the different phenotypes observed in DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (n = 32) or atrofish larvae after 24 (n = 38), 48 (n = 35), or 72 (n = 32) hours of 4-OHT treatment, with HuC/D immunostaining showing spinal neurons. Significance is determined by contingency Fisher’s exact test exact. (C) Confocal sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours (right) at 6 dpf showing phalloidin incorporation (green), HuC/D (purple), and SV2 (cyan) immunolabelling in trunk skeletal muscles. Bottom row shows phalloidin, HuC/D, and SV2 staining in the central region of the trunk muscles shown in the top row. (D) Apotome sections of DMSO-treated atrofish larvae (left) or atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 72 hours (middle and right) at 6 dpf showing reduced HuC/D (purple) and A4.1025 (green) immunolabelling in trunk skeletal muscles. Asterisks show sites of muscle-fiber and spinal-neuron degeneration. Dorsal root ganglia in the peripheral nervous system (top arrow) and neurons in the gut (bottom arrow) are not affected by muscle degeneration. Scale bars: 100 μm.

    (TIF)

    pgen.1012019.s004.tif (38.1MB, tif)
    S5 Fig. Atrofish larvae and adults differ in their capacity for recovery.

    (A) GO (Gene Ontology) between atrofish larvae treated with DMSO for 24 hours and atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours, with all larvae then placed in chemical-free medium for 48 hours until 8 dpf. (B) KEGG analysis between atrofish larvae treated with DMSO for 24 hours and atrofish larvae treated with 4-OHT for 24 hours, with all larvae then placed in chemical-free medium for 48 hours until 8 dpf. (C) Schematic representation of injury locations and distribution (distribution = number of injuries in a particular location as a percentage of the total number of injuries) in control fish (black) and atrofish (red) treated with TAM for 5 months until 6 months of age: ratio of injury size (top), number of injuries (middle), and volume of injuries (bottom) between control and atrofish. The red line separates the different muscle regions of interest for the analysis. (D) Quantification of fish weight in control fish (n = 19) treated with tamoxifen (TAM) or atrofish treated with either DMSO (n = 21) or TAM (n = 21). Statistical significance is determined by Mann-Whitney test, two-tailed, unpaired. (E) Quantification of fish length in TAM-treated control fish (n = 19) or atrofish treated with either DMSO (n = 21) or TAM (n = 21). Statistical significance is determined by Mann-Whitney test, two-tailed, unpaired. (F) Quantification of swimming capacity of control fish and atrofish at 6 months of age, treated with either DMSO (n = 9) or 4-OHT (n = 15) for 5 months, represented by gender. Statistical significance is determined by a Two-way Anova. (G) Quantification of swimming capacity of control fish and atrofish at 9 months of age, treated with TAM for 5 months until 6 months of age, and then treated for with either DMSO (n = 9) or TAM (n = 15) for an additional 3 months (until 9 months of age) to test for recovery of swimming function, represented by gender. Statistical significance is determined by a Two-way Anova. Error bars represent s.d. S5C in S5 Fig: Created in BioRender. Menard, R. (2025) - https://BioRender.com/asky5az.

    (TIF)

    pgen.1012019.s005.tif (29.6MB, tif)
    S1 Table. List of genes dysregulated in the atrofish at 6 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf.

    (XLSX)

    pgen.1012019.s006.xlsx (751.2KB, xlsx)
    S2 Table. List of genes dysregulated in the atrofish at 8 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf, and recovery between 6 and 5 dpf.

    (XLSX)

    pgen.1012019.s007.xlsx (68.4KB, xlsx)
    S1 Movie. Representative 3D reconstruction of the neuromuscular system of control larvae at 6 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf.

    (MP4)

    Download video file (79.6MB, mp4)
    S2 Movie. Representative 3D reconstruction of the neuromuscular system of atrofish larvae at 6 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf.

    (MP4)

    Download video file (62.1MB, mp4)
    S3 Movie. Representative movie of swimming capacity of 4-OHT-treated larvae before and during treatment.

    (MP4)

    Download video file (37.7MB, mp4)
    S4 Movie. Representative movie of blood flow in the trunk circulatory system of control larvae at 6 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf.

    (GIF)

    pgen.1012019.s011.gif (97.1MB, gif)
    S5 Movie. Representative movie of blood flow in the trunk circulatory system of atrofish larvae at 6 dpf after 4-OHT treatment between 5 and 6 dpf.

    (GIF)

    pgen.1012019.s012.gif (93.3MB, gif)
    S6 Movie. Representative movie of swimming capacity of 4-OHT-treated larvae during recovery following treatment.

    (MP4)

    Download video file (68.3MB, mp4)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PloS Genet_Atrofish_Rebuttal_Final.docx

    pgen.1012019.s014.docx (1.4MB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PloS Genet_Atrofish_RebuttalV2RM.docx

    pgen.1012019.s015.docx (441.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    Data availability. All data, reagents, and genetic tools presented in this manuscript are available to the scientific community, either in a public repository, within the manuscript itself or as supplementary information. The transcriptomics data are publicly available at the GEO database and the accession numbers are GSE274353, GSE80221 and GSE144885.


    Articles from PLOS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES