Abstract
The utilization of organophosphate pesticides (OPs) has escalated in response to the growing global food demand driven by a rapidly increasing population and the environmental disruptions caused by climate change. While acute exposure leads to cholinergic poisoning, chronic OP exposure has been linked to organ dysfunction, inflammation, and carcinogenesis. Serum samples from healthy individuals (n = 11), patients with acute OP exposure (n = 12), and those with chronic OP exposure (n = 31) were analyzed to discern the differentially expressed pathways after acute and chronic OP exposure. Differential expression analysis identified 132 proteins altered in chronic exposure vs. control, 86 in acute exposure vs. control, and 124 in chronic vs. acute exposure. Pathway analysis revealed increased blood coagulation and reduced LXR/RXR activation and DCHR24 signaling in both acute and chronic exposures. Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory proteins, such as S100A8, VWF, and GPIBA, were observed, particularly in chronic exposure, highlighting significant inflammatory effects of OP exposure. These findings provide insights into the pathological mechanisms underlying chronic OP exposure and its contribution to inflammation and long-term health risks.
Keywords: Organophosphate exposure, blood-serum proteomics, LC-MS/MS, carcinogenesis, inflammation
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
Pesticides refer to chemical agents applied to crops for protection from pests, weeds, and insects and include a wide range of insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, and rodenticides1, 2. Four major categories of pesticides are used today, classified based on their chemical composition, mode of action, level of toxicity, and method of application; Carbamates, Organochlorine, Organophosphate, and Pyrethroids1. Organophosphate-based pesticides (OPs) are molecules containing esters, amides, or thiols derived from phosphoric acid1, 3. In recent years, the prevalence of OPs has increased dramatically, primarily driven by the increasing food demand due to the rapidly growing population, especially in developing countries4. However, with the increased use of OPs comes environmental degradation and biological toxicity4. Detectable levels of organophosphate residues – such as chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and malathion – have been identified in biological matrices such as human blood serum and urine5–7.
Organophosphates primarily exert their pesticide effects by the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in pests; however, because OPs have the same effect on humans, avoidance of exposure is necessary8, 9. AChE is primarily located in the neuromuscular junctions, as well as peripheral and central cholinergic nerve terminals10. AChE is responsible for the hydrolysis of acetylcholine at these sites into acetate and choline11. Acetylcholine (ACh) plays a pivotal role in modulating several vital physiological functions, including myocardial contractions, regulation of vascular tone, gastrointestinal peristalsis, and exocrine glandular secretion10, 12. Within the CNS, ACh is integral to cognitive processes such as learning, memory consolidation, and the regulation of circadian rhythm. At the neuromuscular junction, ACh facilitates the excitation of skeletal muscle fibers, initiating muscle contraction12. Prolonged inhibition of AChE can cause a buildup of acetylcholine at such neuromuscular junctions leading to cholinergic poisoning13. Cholinergic poisoning at neuromuscular junctions can lead to muscle fasciculations and inflammation due to overactivation of acetylcholine receptors14. Whereas the inhibition of AChE in the central nervous system may lead to insomnia, confusion, and drowsiness14, 15.. AChE is primarily located in the neuromuscular junctions, as well as peripheral and central cholinergic nerve terminals10. AChE is responsible for the hydrolysis of acetylcholine at these sites into acetate and choline11. Acetylcholine (ACh) plays a pivotal role in modulating several vital physiological functions, including myocardial contractions, regulation of vascular tone, gastrointestinal peristalsis, and exocrine glandular secretion10, 12. Within the CNS, ACh is integral to cognitive processes such as learning, memory consolidation, and the regulation of circadian rhythm. At the neuromuscular junction, ACh facilitates the excitation of skeletal muscle fibers, initiating muscle contraction12. Prolonged inhibition of AChE can cause a buildup of acetylcholine at such neuromuscular junctions leading to cholinergic poisoning13. Cholinergic poisoning at neuromuscular junctions can lead to muscle fasciculations and inflammation due to overactivation of acetylcholine receptors14. Whereas the inhibition of AChE in the central nervous system may lead to insomnia, confusion, and drowsiness14, 15.
Recent epidemiological studies have identified a correlation between organophosphate exposure and an elevated risk of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), Parkinson’s Disease (PD), and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)16, 17. Although the acute neurotoxic effects of OPs, particularly their role in cholinergic poisoning, are well-established, there remains a substantial gap in our understanding of how OPs interact with the broader human proteome. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that OPs may also contribute to multi-organ dysfunction18. This includes hepatic fibrosis and impaired liver function19, pulmonary damage20, and cardiovascular complications21, all of which are underexplored in current literature. The need for comprehensive studies on the systemic effects of OPs beyond their neurotoxic impact is critical for a fuller understanding of their long-term health consequences.16, 17. Although the acute neurotoxic effects of OPs, particularly their role in cholinergic poisoning, are well-established, there remains a substantial gap in our understanding of how OPs interact with the broader human proteome. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that OPs may also contribute to multi-organ dysfunction18. This includes hepatic fibrosis and impaired liver function19, pulmonary damage20, and cardiovascular complications21, all of which are underexplored in current literature. The need for comprehensive studies on the systemic effects of OPs beyond their neurotoxic impact is critical for a fuller understanding of their long-term health consequences.
This study aims to address this research gap using an advanced bottom-up LC-MS/MS-based proteomics approach to analyze blood serum samples acquired from patients who were either acutely or chronically exposed to OPs. We aim to elucidate the alterations in biological mechanisms and pathways that underpin the diverse and often severe health effects associated with chronic OP exposure and to distinguish these mechanisms from those involved in acute exposure. These insights have the potential to transform the therapeutic approach to OP exposure and inform the development of a more targeted public health strategy amidst the escalating use of pesticides worldwide.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Reagents
HPLC-grade water (H2O), acetonitrile (ACN), and MS-grade formic acid (FA) were sourced from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). Ammonium bicarbonate (ABC), dithiothreitol (DTT), and iodoacetamide (IAA) were obtained from Sigma-Aldric (St. Louis, MO, USA). The Trypsin/Lys-C mix MS-grade was supplied by Promega (Madison, WI, USA). The 14 Multiple Affinity Removal Column, along with Buffer A and Buffer B, were purchased from Agilent Technologies Inc. (Santa Clara, CA).
Study Participants
The study was conducted according to a protocol approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University (approval number 0107603) and in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, and its later amendments. The study was registered on the Protocol Registration and Results System of ClinicalTrials.gov under the Identifier NCT06021262. The study aimed at examining the potential neuroinflammatory biomarkers in patients with chronic OP exposure. For recruitment, sample size was estimated guided by reported serum levels for two inflammatory markers reported to increase in Parkinson’s disease, a neuroinflammatory consequence of OP exposure22, the first being IL-623, while the second was the C-reactive protein24. Based on the differences and observed variabilities reported for these markers23, 25, a sample size analysis26 for 1(control or acute OP exposure):2(Chronic OP exposure) enrolment ratio returned a 10/20 sample based on IL-6 values, and a 9/18 sample based on CRP values for an 80% power with 95% confidence. Since the present study was exploratory with an interest in changes in chronic exposure patients, patient recruitment in this group extended to an additional 50% margin to improve the detection of differences, while maintaining a reasonable recruitment time frame.
Blood samples, including control (n = 11), chronic OP exposure (n = 31), and acute exposure (n = 12) were obtained from 18–60-year-old subjects after signing an informed consent. Chronic exposure samples were collected in October 2022 from male small-holder vegetable farmers from Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate in Egypt with known repeated exposure to the OP pesticide through repeated self-application over at least the previous three cultivation seasons. Farmers were interviewed to confirm the exposure through the lack of use of personal protective gear. Acute exposure samples were collected from patients presenting to the Poison Center at the Alexandria Main University Hospital with documented OP pesticide exposure between May and October 2023. Control samples were obtained from age-matched city dwellers from Alexandria, Egypt. Five ml of whole blood were collected in tubes containing a separating gel and clot activator. The tubes were left to rest for 1 hour then centrifuged in a refrigerated centrifuge at 1,500 x g for 10 minutes, the serum was then separated into 0.5ml aliquots stored at −80°C. At the time of experiment, serum proteins were extracted from 100 μL of human blood serum by adding 200 μL Dichloromethane/ methanol (DCM/MeOH) (1:2 v/v) and vortexing for 30 s. The samples were then incubated on ice for 1 h before 75 μL of DCM and water were added and vortexed vigorously for 30 s each time. Next, the samples were centrifuged at 5000 RPM for 15 min. Three layers consisting of water soluble metabolites, proteins, and lipid fractions were formed, from which the middle layer containing the proteins was carefully collected and transferred to a new tube.
The mean age was 40 for control, 39 for acute exposure, and 43 for chronic exposure. Profenofos was the predominant OP compound, accounting for 5 (41.67%) of acute cases and 17 (54.85%) of chronic cases. Other significant OP compounds included Chlorpyrifos, Malathion, and Methamidofos. Most patients had no prior health conditions; however, among chronic exposure cases, 2 patients had diabetes and 2 had hypertension, while 1 acute exposure patient presented with chronic kidney disease. The primary route of exposure for both acute and chronic exposure were inhalation and dermal contact. Lastly, the median exposure time for chronic patients was 15 years.
Depletion of High-Abundance Proteins and Protein Assay
Prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, 14 high-abundant proteins in the serum samples were depleted to enhance the sensitivity of low-abundant proteins. These proteins include Albumin, IgG, antitrypsin, IgA, haptoglobin, transferrin, alpha-2-macroglobulin, fibrinogen, alpha-1-acid-glycoprotein, IgM, complement C3, apolipoprotein AI, apolipoprotein AII, transthyretin. These high-abundance proteins constitute the majority of the total protein concentration in serum and interfere with the detection and quantification of low-abundance proteins. Given their critical biological significance, the study of low-abundance proteins is crucial for a comprehensive proteomics analysis.
The samples were reconstituted in 200 μL of 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC) solution containing 2.5% sodium deoxycholate (SDC). The samples were then homogenized using a microtube homogenizer and subjected to sonication on ice for an hour. Then, 30 μL of both control and experimental samples were subjected to depletion using the Human 14 Multiple Affinity Removal Column by Agilent. Following depletion, the resulting fractions were concentrated using a 5K MWCO Amicon spin concentrator and then reconstituted in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC) buffer for further analysis. The protein concentrations for the final samples were determined using the Micro BCA™ Protein Assay Kit from Thermo Scientific, Rockford, PIL.
Tryptic Digestion of Low Abundance Proteins
The equivalent of 50 μg of protein was taken from each sample and denatured at 90 °C for 15 minutes. The denatured proteins were then reduced by the addition of 2.5 μL of 200 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and incubation at 60°C for 45 minutes. The reduced samples were then carbamidomethylated using 10 μL of 200 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) and incubated at 37°C for 45 minutes. A second addition of 2.5 μL of 200 mM DTT followed by incubation at 37°C for 30 minutes was performed to quench the excess IAA. Trypsin was added to the alkylated samples in a 1:25 enzyme-to-protein ratio and the samples were incubated at 37°C for 18 hours. Samples were then dried using a SpeedVac concentrator, reconstituted in 0.1% formic acid, and subjected to LC-MS/MS proteomics analysis.
LC-MS/MS Proteomics Analysis
The tryptic digests, once dried, were reconstituted in a solution containing 2% ACN and 0.1% FA. For analysis, 1 μL of these samples, corresponding to 1 μg of total protein, was injected into a C18 trap column (75 μm x 2 cm, 2 μm, 100 Å; from Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and maintained there for 10 minutes. Subsequently, the samples were transferred to an Aclaim PepMap C18 capillary column (75 μm x 15 cm, 2 μm, 100 Å; also, from Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) via an Ultimate 3000 nanoUHPLC system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA). The system operated at a flow rate of 300 nL/min and a temperature of 30°C. The mobile phase A comprised an aqueous solution with 2% ACN and 0.1% FA, while mobile phase B was a mix of ACN, 2% water, and 0.1% FA. The peptide separation gradient involved initially holding 5% of mobile phase B for the first 10 minutes, followed by a linear increase to 35% between 11 and 80 minutes, then a rise to 60% at 110 minutes. From 110 to 113 minutes, mobile phase B was increased from 60% to 90%. This 90% level was maintained for 5 minutes, then reduced to 5% between 118 and 119 minutes, and finally held at 5% from 119 to 135 minutes. The nanoUHPLC system was connected to an Orbitrap QExactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA), operating in positive ion mode. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent acquisition mode with an MS1 resolution of 120,000 for MS1, covering an m/z range of 370–1800 with an AGC target of 1E6. The MS2 acquisition was performed at a resolution of 45,000, with a scan range of 200–2000 m/z and a dynamic exclusion window of 10 seconds. A summary of the proteomics workflow is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Summary of the Experimental Workflow.
Protein Identification and Quantification
Protein identification and quantification were performed using Proteome Discoverer (PD) software (Thermo Scientific) using the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot human protein database. The peptide length was specified between 6 and 40 amino acids. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was set as a constant modification, with acetylation of the N-terminus and oxidation of methionine were variable modifications. Identification criteria included 1% FDR for high-confidence proteins and 5% FDR for medium-abundance proteins. Only high-confidence peptides were considered. Protein precursor mass tolerance was set to 10 ppm. A total of 401 proteins were identified, comprising 386 high-confidence and 15 medium-confidence proteins. The low-confidence proteins (FDR > 0.05) were filtered out prior to further analysis. None of the 14 high-abundance proteins were among the 401 proteins used for further analysis.
Further analysis, including statistical testing, differential expression analysis via hierarchically clustered heatmaps and volcano plots, and gene set enrichment analysis were performed using R and Python scripts. Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) by Qiagen was used to examine functional correlations and perform further pathway analysis.
Data Analysis
Displaying high dimensional data, beyond 3-dimensions, can be extremely challenging. Principal component analysis is a dimensionality reduction operation used to reduce the dimensionality of large data sets while preserving as much information in the data as possible. PCA is particularly valuable in proteomics experiments as it allows for the visualization of high-dimensional data, where each protein represents a dimension, in either two- or three- dimensional space. Furthermore, its unsupervised nature allows for the visualization of natural clusters within the data without prior knowledge of sample classification, making it especially useful for uncovering differences between cohorts or identifying hidden patterns. Principal components (PCs) are ranked based on the amount of information they contain. Usually, the first 2 principal components are displayed in a 2D scatter plot, each representing a unique sample. PCA was performed on the entirety of the proteomics data, the resulting plot is displayed in Figure 2A.
Figure 2.

A) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plot of the whole proteome in control, acute exposure, and chronic exposure cohorts. Volcano plot comparisons for B) chronic exposure (n = 31) vs. control (n = 11), C) acute exposure (n = 12) vs. control (n = 11), and D) chronic exposure (n = 31) vs. acute exposure (n = 12). The significance thresholds are displayed by the dashed lines (p-value < 0.05 and fold-change > 2) and color-coded points, with red signifying upregulation and green downregulation. The grey points represent proteins outside the statistical threshold.
Following the PCA, differential expression analysis was conducted to identify proteins displaying significantly altered expression pattern. Three comparisons were made, chronic OP exposure vs. control, acute OP exposure vs. control, and chronic vs. acute OP exposure using a Welch’s T-test. Proteins with p-values < 0.05 were considered to be differentially expressed. Volcano plots were constructed to display the expression patterns of the significantly altered proteins. A volcano plot is a scatter plot displaying the log2-fold chance on the x-axis and the -log10(p-value) on the y-axis, with the upregulated highly differentially expressed proteins (red) being towards the top right, and downregulated (green) towards the top left of the scatter plot.
Furthermore, hierarchically clustered heatmaps were constructed for each comparison to identify clusters of significantly altered proteins displaying similar changes in expression. Following comparative statistical analysis, gene ontology (GO), hallmark, and panther gene set enrichment analysis were conducted for the statistically significant proteins across each comparison. The analysis aimed to discern the altered biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular pathways underlying organophosphate exposure. The clusterProfiler package was employed along with Hallmark, Panther, and the Genome-wide annotation for humans for the gene set enrichment analysis. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) plots were constructed to identify connections between differentially expressed proteins. PPI plots, also known as string analysis, are used to analyze connections between a group of proteins. Proteins are represented as nodes (circles) and the connections between them as edges. Proteins that are either expressed, colocalized, or involved in similar functions tend to cluster together with bolder connections
Parallel Reaction Monitoring Validation
Finally, parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) was conducted to validate the expression of 14 differentially expressed proteins, including VWF, DNAH9, ACTG1, ITIH2, ITIH3, MBL2, GPX3, APOL1, IGF2, AGT, APOA4, S100A8, AGT, and APOE. These proteins were specifically selected due to their involvement in key pathways discussed throughout this article. Only 26 out the 31 chronic exposure samples could be used for PRM analysis due to limitations in sample quantity. The LC-MS/MS parameters were identical to those of the full scan, except for the addition of the inclusion list. A retention time window ± 5 minutes (totaling 10 minutes) around the peak elution time was used for each peptide to accommodate minor shifts in the elution time. Peptide identification was performed using Proteome Discoverer (Thermo Scientific) and subsequent quantification was performed using Skyline (MacCoss Lab Software) using the fragments provided by Proteome Discoverer. The quantified data was log2 transformed and a Welch’s t-test was utilized for differential expression analysis, with a p-value < 0.05 signifying differential expression.
Results
The 2D PCA plot represented in Figure 2A demonstrates a distinct separation among the control, chronic exposure, and acute exposure groups, highlighting substantial proteomic changes following organophosphate exposure. The ellipsoids represent a 98% confidence interval for each sample group, calculated based on a normal distribution. It is important to note that gender-specific principal component analysis was not performed due to the chronic exposure cohort consisting solely of male patients. For detailed comparisons, PCA plots for individual group analyses are provided in Figure S1.
Differential Expression Analysis via Volcano Plots and Hierarchically Clustered Heatmaps
The differential expression analysis identified 132 differentially expressed proteins in the chronic exposure versus control comparison, 86 in the acute exposure versus control comparison, and 124 in the chronic versus acute exposure comparison. The detailed results of this differential expression analysis are presented in Table 1. The volcano plots in Figure 2B–2D display the expression of significantly altered proteins. Two major clusters were identified in the hierarchically clustered heatmaps for each comparison, belonging to upregulated and downregulated proteins. A subset cluster of upregulated proteins involved in blood coagulation was identified after chronic exposure, including kininogen (KNG1), protein C (PROC), and von Willebrand factor (VWF). The heatmaps for the significantly altered proteins in each comparison are displayed in Figure S2–S4.
Table 1.
Summary of Differential Expression Analysis using Welch’s T-Test for pairwise comparison
| Comparison | Differentially Expressed1 | Upregulated2 | Downregulated2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic vs. Control | 132 | 61 | 71 |
| Acute vs. Control | 86 | 37 | 49 |
| Chronic vs. Acute | 124 | 69 | 55 |
Proteins with p-value < 0.05 are classified as differentially expressed across each comparison
Differentially expressed proteins with log2(fold-change) > 0 are considered upregulated and log2(fold-change) < 0 are considered downregulated
Comparative Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins
Intersection analysis was performed to identify common differentially expressed proteins across different comparisons. As shown in Figure 3A, 31 proteins were significantly altered and common to all three comparisons. The corresponding heatmap and pathway involvements are displayed in Figure 3B, 3C, and 3D respectively. Additionally, 28 proteins were uniquely altered in the chronic exposure vs. control comparison, 5 were unique to acute exposure vs. control, and 20 were unique to chronic vs. acute exposure. The representative barplots for the 31 proteins commonly altered in all three groups are provided in Figure S5.
Figure 3.

Comparison analysis of differentially expressed proteins represented by the A) Venn diagram comparing common significant proteins between the three comparisons, B) Hierarchically clustered heatmap for the 31 proteins commonly differentially expressed between the three cohorts. The Sankey plot displaying Hallmark gene annotations for common differentially expressed proteins in C) chronic exposure vs. control and D) acute exposure vs. control, only processes involving two or more proteins are displayed.
Notably, A major downregulation of apolipoproteins was observed in both acute and chronic exposure, with the decrease being more pronounced in acute exposure. Apolipoprotein E (APOE), C1 (APOC1), C3 (APOC3), and A4 (APOA4) were significantly downregulated in both chronic and acute exposure. The downregulation in acute exposure was substantial enough to also be significant when comparing chronic vs. acute exposure.
A significant disruption in the serpin family of proteins was observed, with specific members showing differential expressions in response to chronic and acute organophosphate exposure. Specifically, SERPINA4, SERPINA6, SERPINA7, SERPINF1, SERPINF2 were downregulated in patients with chronic exposure, while SERPINA10 and SERPIND1 were upregulated. In cases of acute exposure, SERPINA6 and SERPINC1 were downregulated, whereas SERPINA7 and SERPINA10 were upregulated. The serpin proteins are known to play critical roles in processes such as blood coagulation, inflammation, and complement activation, indicating significant dysregulation in these biological pathways.
Additionally, a similar pattern of disruption was observed among apolipoproteins, with APOA4, APOC1, APOC3, and APOL1 clustering together, as illustrated in the heatmap in Figure 3B. This clustering further suggests that organophosphate exposure leads to widespread proteomic alterations that may have profound implications for lipid metabolism and related physiological processes. The corresponding boxplots for these proteins are available in Figure S5, providing a detailed view of their expression levels across different exposure conditions.
Gene Set Enrichment and Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis
Hallmark and panther gene set enrichment revealed major alterations in the blood coagulation pathway in chronic and acute exposure cohorts. Out of the significant proteins for chronic exposure vs. control and acute exposure vs. control, there were 26 and 16 proteins involved in the coagulation pathway respectively. Panther analysis revealed disruptions in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor signaling pathway after chronic and acute exposure, with the effect being more pronounced in chronic exposure, suggesting a worsening effect of organophosphates on acetylcholinesterase over prolonged exposure.
The disruption was primarily evident from the dysregulation of key proteins such as MYH1, MYH7B, MYH8, MYH6, ACTBL2, ACTG1, and BCHE for both chronic and acute exposure. Butyryl choline esterase is involved in the scavenging of organophosphate radicals before they act upon AChE in the central nervous system27, 28. Unlike AChE, loss of function of BCHE is not associated with any toxicity in humans, hence upregulation of BCHE in both acute and chronic patients suggests a compensatory mechanism from the human body against organophosphates. Furthermore, under high concentrations of acetylcholine, as would be the case upon suppression of AChE, BCHE becomes highly efficient at the hydrolysis of acetylcholine29, 30.
Additionally, the p53 and Alzheimer’s disease-presenilin pathways were uniquely dysregulated in chronic OP exposure, indicating potential neurodegenerative and carcinogenic effects associated with prolonged exposure. Lastly, the complement system was observed to be disrupted in both acute and chronic exposure samples. In total, 14 proteins associated with the complement pathway were dysregulated in patients with chronic exposure, compared to 10 proteins in those with acute exposure, suggesting a more pronounced impact on the immune system with prolonged exposure.
PPI analysis for the significantly altered proteins in chronic OP exposure vs. control revealed a major cluster of proteins involved in lipid metabolism, complement activation, and coagulation. Furthermore, another small cluster of proteins involved in muscle contraction was also observed. These clusters were also observed in acute exposure vs. control. The PPI plots are displayed in Figures 4E and 4F.
Figure 4.

Hallmark gene set enrichment for A) chronic exposure vs. control and C) acute exposure vs. control. The x-axis represents the -log10(p-value), with higher values indicating higher significance. Panther gene set enrichment for B) chronic exposure vs. control and D) acute exposure vs. control, similarly with the x-axis representing -log10(p-value). Protein-protein interaction plots for E) chronic exposure vs. control and F) acute exposure vs. control with major clusters being highlighted in the red-dashed circles.
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis
While gene set enrichment analysis can identify disrupted pathways, they are essentially hypergeometric and may not predict whether a pathway is activated or inhibited. Thus, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software (Qiagen) was used for directional pathway analysis. A summary of the statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) are provided in supplementary figure S6 and S7 for chronic exposure vs. control and acute exposure vs. control, respectively.
For chronic exposure patients, LXR/RXR activation and DHCR24 signaling pathways were the most downregulated, while the formation of fibrin clots and serotonin receptor signaling pathways were upregulated as displayed in Figure 5A. Furthermore, adhesion of blood platelets, aggregation of blood cells, and coagulation were all functions that were upregulated suggesting a significant increase in the coagulation and clotting pathways (Figure 5A). Function of muscle was downregulated, suggesting muscle damage effect of chronic organophosphate exposure. Multiple proteins such as VWF, SERPIND1, S100A8, GP1BA, APOE, APOB, and FGA were found to be involved in more than one of these pathways, as displayed in Figure 5A and 5C. Upstream analysis for chronic samples predicted inhibition of key transcription factors such as HNF4A, CEBPA, TP53, HTT, and RET. A dramatic increase in the serotonin signaling pathway was observed in chronic exposure. Activation of serotonin receptor signaling has previously been reported in acute OP exposure31–33, here we observe that the increase was more prominent in chronic exposure patients. Serotonin signaling was elevated in acute exposure patients but was not statistically significant. Lastly, the inhibition of the SUMO family of proteins, including SUMO1, SUMO2, and SUMO3 along with PRDX1 and NFE2L2 was also predicted, as represented in Figure 5B.
Figure 5.

Ingenuity pathway analysis for differentially expressed proteins. A) Canonical pathways and disease and function enrichment for chronic exposure vs. control. B) Predicted downregulation of SUMO family, PRDX1, and NFE2L2 in chronic exposure vs. control. C) Canonical pathways and disease and function enrichment for acute exposure vs. control. D) Predicted downregulation of the TP53 gene after organophosphate exposure. Predicted downregulation is represented in blue, predicted upregulation in orange, observed downregulation in green, and observed upregulation in red.
LXR/RXR activation and DCHR24 signaling pathways were similarly inhibited in acute exposure patients, along with the activation of the S100 family signaling pathway (Figure 5C). The disease and function analysis revealed an increase in the formation of blood clots, inflammation of the lungs, and cerebrovascular dysfunction along with a decrease in the concentration of fatty acids as shown in Figure 5C. Lastly, TP53 was predicted to be significantly downregulated after both acute and chronic OP exposure, however a larger number of proteins that predicted the downregulation of TP53 were altered under chronic exposure, suggesting a bigger change (Figure 5D).
PRM Validation Results
A total of 86 peptides from the 14 proteins chosen for PRM quantitation were identified and quantified, with majority of the peptides displaying a similar trend as observed in the main study. Boxplots for six representative peptides are displayed in Figure 6, with the further boxplots being displayed in Supplementary Figure S9. Additionally, the abundance data for each peptide has been provided in Supplementary Table S4 along with their gene names and Uniprot accession IDs.
Figure 6.

Boxplot displaying the PRM abundance of 6 representative peptides (control in grey, acute exposure in yellow, and chronic exposure in red). The majority of the peptides were found to follow a similar trend in PRM and full-scan MS.
Discussion
While the acute neurotoxic effects of OP exposure, primarily cholinergic poisoning, are well-documented and understood, emerging evidence suggests that chronic exposure to OPs can lead to significant and often overlooked organ dysfunction19–21. Gulf War illness (GWI), affecting 30–44% of 1990–1991 Gulf War veterans, is primarily linked to chronic organophosphate exposure and remains a major health concern despite decades of research and significant healthcare investments34, 35, 36. This study aimed to identify the biochemical pathways and protein interactions that contribute to the disorders observed after chronic OP exposure, beyond the well-known acute neurotoxic effects. Findings revealed disrupted lipid metabolism, increased inflammation via dysregulated liver X receptor (LXR) pathways, reduced SUMOylation, and upregulation of pro-inflammatory proteins such as S100A8 and Von Willebrand Factor (VWF). These changes suggest a persistent inflammatory state contributing to organ dysfunction and neuroinflammation-related cognitive disorders. Serum proteins play essential roles in transport, immune response, inflammation regulation, and blood coagulation, making them critical targets for studying the effects of organophosphate exposure. Furthermore, serum proteins provide a minimally invasive diagnostic tool for detecting organophosphate exposure, offering a practical alternative to tissue biopsies.
The liver X receptors (LXRs) are type II nuclear receptors part of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily responsible for gene regulation via controlling cholesterol and lipid metabolism37. LXRs are accountable for raising lipoprotein concentration, and the downregulation of various apolipoproteins such as APOE, APOC3, APOC1, and APOL were majorly responsible for the prediction of the inhibition of LXR/RXR pathway38. LXRs possess an anti-inflammatory effect by repressing the expression of various pro-inflammatory proteins37, 39. LXRs are activated by various oxysterol ligands and form heterodimers with Retinoid X Receptors (RXRs) upon ligand binding40. The LXR/RXR heterodimer promotes the transcription of APOE (downregulated), ABCA1, ABCG, and various other proteins involved in lipid metabolism39, 41.The liver X receptors (LXRs) are type II nuclear receptors part of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily responsible for gene regulation via controlling cholesterol and lipid metabolism37. LXRs are accountable for raising lipoprotein concentration, and the downregulation of various apolipoproteins such as APOE, APOC3, APOC1, and APOL were majorly responsible for the prediction of the inhibition of LXR/RXR pathway38. LXRs possess an anti-inflammatory effect by repressing the expression of various pro-inflammatory proteins37, 39. LXRs are activated by various oxysterol ligands and form heterodimers with Retinoid X Receptors (RXRs) upon ligand binding40. The LXR/RXR heterodimer promotes the transcription of APOE (downregulated), ABCA1, ABCG, and various other proteins involved in lipid metabolism41. Furthermore, SUMOylated LXRs also interact with the corepressor complex at the promoter of NFkB, preventing the clearance of these corepressors and thus inhibiting the expression of these pro-inflammatory genes (Figure 5). Inhibition of the LXR/RXR activation pathway suggests an increase in the transcription of pro-inflammatory proteins and an overall increase in inflammation40, 42, 43. Furthermore, the anti-inflammatory effects of synthetic LXRs have previously been demonstrated39, 44–46.
Notably, a decrease in SUMOylation was also observed in patients with chronic exposure, as indicated by the predicted inhibition of the SUMO family of proteins shown in Figure 5B. SUMOylation, much like ubiquitination, is a post-translational modification involving the attachment of a small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) proteins to lysine residues in target proteins47. This modification plays a critical role in the regulation of transcription, cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and subcellular localization47, 48. Additionally, SUMOylation inhibits NF-κB pathway activity by modifying IκBα, with a reduction in SUMOylation suggesting an increase in the release of pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-649–52. Furthermore, SUMOylation is essential for the function of the survival of motor neuron (SMN) complex, with deficiencies in SMN linked to spinal muscular atrophy53. These findings highlight the multifaceted impact of SUMOylation on inflammation and cellular function, suggesting that disrupted SUMOylation may contribute significantly to the pathology observed in chronic OP exposure. Notably, a decrease in SUMOylation was also observed in patients with chronic exposure, as indicated by the predicted inhibition of the SUMO family of proteins shown in Figure 5B. SUMOylation, much like ubiquitination, is a post-translational modification involving the attachment of a small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) proteins to lysine residues in target proteins47. This modification plays a critical role in the regulation of transcription, cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and subcellular localization47, 48. Additionally, SUMOylation inhibits NF-κB pathway activity by modifying IκBα, with a reduction in SUMOylation suggesting an increase in the release of pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-649–52. Furthermore, SUMOylation is essential for the function of the survival of motor neuron (SMN) complex, with deficiencies in SMN linked to spinal muscular atrophy53. These findings highlight the multifaceted impact of SUMOylation on inflammation and cellular function, suggesting that disrupted SUMOylation may contribute significantly to the pathology observed in chronic OP exposure.
S100 calcium-binding protein A8 (S100A8) was notably upregulated after chronic and acute exposure, with the effect being more prominent in chronic exposure patients. S100A8 plays an essential role in inflammation via the recruitment of neutrophils and has been observed to be upregulated in various inflammatory diseases such as gout, diabetes, and obesity54, 55. Von Willebrand Factor (VWF), another protein involved in the progression of inflammation via neutrophil recruitment, was also observed to be significantly upregulated in both acute and chronic exposure patients56.
Blood coagulation, also referred to as blood clotting, is a crucial physiological process that prevents excessive blood loss upon injury57, 58. Coagulation is essential for maintaining the integrity of the circulatory system upon injury; however, constant upregulation of the coagulation cascade can lead to serious medical problems such as thrombosis59, myocardial infarction60, and ischemic stroke61. Furthermore, vascular abnormalities and alterations in the coagulation system have also been associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD)62. A significant increase in blood coagulation was observed in both acute and chronic exposure cohorts, as shown in Figures 4A – 4D, 5A, and 5C. Thrombospondin-1 (THBS1) is a component of the platelet-α-granules released during platelet activation and is known to accelerate platelet aggregation. THBS1 was found to be significantly increased in chronic exposure patients, and while there was an overall increase in acute exposure patients, the increase was not statistically significant. Glycoprotein Ib-IX-V-complex, composed of glycoprotein Ib-beta (GPIBB), glycoprotein Ib-alpha (GPIBA), glycoprotein IX, and GPV, acts as a receptor for VWF on the platelet surface. The binding of VWF to the GP Ib-IX-V complex facilitates platelet adhesion to vascular subendothelium to increase blood coagulation63, 64.Blood coagulation, also referred to as blood clotting, is a crucial physiological process that prevents excessive blood loss upon injury57, 58. Coagulation is essential for maintaining the integrity of the circulatory system upon injury; however, constant upregulation of the coagulation cascade can lead to serious medical problems such as thrombosis59, myocardial infarction60, and ischemic stroke61. Furthermore, vascular abnormalities and alterations in the coagulation system have also been associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD)62. A significant increase in blood coagulation was observed in both acute and chronic exposure cohorts, as shown in Figures 4A – 4D, 5A, and 5B. Thrombospondin-1 (THBS1) is a component of the platelet-α-granules released during platelet activation and is known to accelerate platelet aggregation. THBS1 was found to be significantly increased in chronic exposure patients, and while there was an overall increase in acute exposure patients, the increase was not statistically significant. Glycoprotein Ib-IX-V-complex, composed of glycoprotein Ib-beta (GPIBB), glycoprotein Ib-alpha (GPIBA), glycoprotein IX, and GPV, acts as a receptor for VWF on the platelet surface. The binding of VWF to the GP Ib-IX-V complex facilitates platelet adhesion to vascular subendothelium to increase blood coagulation63, 64. The increase in expression of GPIBA, which contains the binding site for VWF, concurrent with the increase of VWF in chronic exposure patients suggests a systemic increase in blood coagulation.
3ß-hydroxysterol-Δ24-reductase (DHCR24) is involved in the final step of cholesterol synthesis and catalyzes the reduction of the delta-24 double bond of sterol intermediates65. DCHR24 is known to protect cells from oxidative stress by reducing caspase 3 activity along with promoting resistance towards Alzheimer’s disease-associated neurodegeneration66, 67. The strong inhibition of DHCR24 signaling (Supplementary figure S8) after organophosphate exposure suggests a strong neurotoxic effect of OPs primarily caused by cholesterol deficiency and desmosterol accumulation67 in the brain.
Additionally, neuroinflammation and vascular damage, often caused by aberrant coagulation, have been implicated in neurodegenerative disorders such as vascular cognitive impairment and dementia68–70. Moreover, NFkB is responsible for inducing the expression of various pro-inflammatory genes such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) as displayed in Figure 7. Therefore, downregulation of the LXR/RXR activation pathway may indirectly predict the upregulation of IL-6, which has been associated with Alzheimer’s disease and general cognitive decline69, 71. The coordinated regulation of DHCR24 and LXR/RXR activation pathways plays a critical role in attenuating inflammatory responses as evidenced by the substantial overlap in protein networks involved in both pathways. Disruptions in LXR/RXR signaling and DHCR24 function, along with the upregulation of pivotal coagulation-related proteins such as VWF, GPIBA, and S100A8 and downregulation of apolipoproteins, underscore a mechanistic connection between chronic organophosphate exposure and the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders.
Figure 7.

Predicted downregulation of LXR/RXR activation and its impact on inflammatory mediators and immune response. Predicted downregulation is represented in blue, predicted upregulation in orange, observed downregulation in green, and observed upregulation in red.
The increase in inflammation upon chronic exposure was further substantiated by the downregulation of inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chains H2 (ITIH2) and H3 (ITIH3). These proteins are members of the inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitors (ITIs) family which are made up of several heavy chains (ITIH1, ITIH2, ITIH3, and ITIH4) and a light chain, bikunin72. The ITI family is integral to numerous physiological processes, including tumor suppression, wound healing, and the regulation of inflammation72. Both ITIH2 and ITIH3 are postulated to have anti-inflammatory properties and a decrease in concentration has been associated with various cancers73, 74.The increase in inflammation upon chronic exposure was further substantiated by the downregulation of inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chains H2 (ITIH2) and H3 (ITIH3). These proteins are members of the inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitors (ITIs) family which are made up of several heavy chains (ITIH1, ITIH2, ITIH3, and ITIH4) and a light chain, bikunin72. The ITI family is integral to numerous physiological processes, including tumor suppression, wound healing, and the regulation of inflammation72. Both ITIH2 and ITIH3 are postulated to have anti-inflammatory properties and a decrease in concentration has been associated with various cancers73, 74. The concurrent downregulation of ITIH2 and ITIH3 in response to chronic OP exposure not only corroborates the heightened inflammatory response but also offers new insights into the potential relationship between prolonged organophosphate exposure and an increase risk of cancer development. The increase in inflammation and the inhibition of the LXR/RXR activation and DHCR24 signaling pathways were confirmed through the validation of protein expression using parallel-reaction monitoring. This analysis targeted key proteins involved in these pathways, including apolipoproteins (APOA4, APOE, APOC3, and APOL1), inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitors (ITIH2 and ITIH3), von Willebrand factor (VWF), glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3), protein S100-A8 (S100A8), actin (ACTG1), and angiotensinogen (AGT).
While the primary risks associated with organophosphate exposure are cholinergic poisoning and inflammation, recent epidemiologic studies have linked OPs to an increased risk of developing cancer75, 76. We observed a similar effect with the predicted downregulation of tumor protein P53 (TP53) after OP exposure as displayed in Figure 5D. TP53 dubbed the “guardian of the genome”, is the most well-known tumor suppressor gene and is in charge of various cell responses such as apoptosis, cell repair, cell survival, and transcriptional regulation77–80.
Mannose-binding lectin 2 (MBL2) is associated with innate immunity and decreased MBL2 amounts have been associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and predict a poor outcome81. Glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3), also downregulated after OP exposure, is known to have tumor-suppressor properties82. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide radicals can promote carcinogenesis by causing DNA damage and promoting cell proliferation83, 84. GPX3 prevents cancer growth via scavenging of ROS and its downregulation has been associated with the development of breast, ovarian, colon, and gastric cancers83, 85–88. Lastly, Heat shock 70 kDa protein 8 (HSPA8), responsible for molecular chaperoning and protein folding was observed to be upregulated after OP exposure. Overexpression of HSPA8 has been observed in colorectal, liver, and breast cancer89–92. The predicted downregulation of TP53 coupled with aberrant expression of key proteins such as GPX3, MBL2, and HSPA8 illustrate a pro-tumorigenesis effect of organophosphates.
Exposure to OP compounds, including chlorpyrifos93, profenofos94, and malathion95, have previously been associated with an increase in systemic inflammation and carcinogenesis through generation of reactive oxygen species. However, thus far the underlying biochemical mechanisms have remained understudied. This study highlights the alterations in serum proteins that may directly contribute to the observed effects. These findings not only enhance our understanding of the biochemical alterations caused by organophosphate exposure, but also highlight potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic tools. Moreover, key pathways such as LXR/RXR activation and DHCR24 signaling may serve as possible therapeutic targets for treatment of OP exposure related symptoms. Although this study represents a beginning into the exploration of proteomic changes associated with OP exposure, future research is clearly warranted. While the findings of this study present potential protein markers that may prove valuable for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, subsequent investigations involving a larger cohort is necessary to confirm and validate these findings. Moreover, because this study primarily focused on overall protein expression, it will be essential to investigate post-translational modifications – such as glycosylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and SUMOylation – that may also contribute to the observed increase in inflammation and carcinogenesis. Future research direction may involve utilizing animal models to investigate proteomic changes associated with specific exposure routes, providing insights into how various routes of exposure may uniquely impact the proteome within a controlled environment. Additionally, animal model studies would allow for the study of tissue specific changes associated with chronic OP exposure.
Conclusion
Extensive bottom-up proteomic analysis of human serum samples from patients exposed to organophosphate (OP) pesticides revealed significant alterations in biological pathways critical to inflammation, coagulation, neurodegeneration, and cancer. Differential expression analysis identified key proteins, including apolipoproteins, serpin family members, and VWF that were especially dysregulated in chronic exposure, suggesting a progressive increase in inflammation, carcinogenesis, and liver dysfunction. Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed the downregulation of critical pathways such as LXR/RXR activation and DCHR24 signaling, indicating potential pro-inflammatory and neurotoxic effects of OPs. The predicted inhibition of key tumor suppressor proteins like TP53, along with the observed dysregulation of proteins involved in protection from oxidative stress and innate immunity, such as GPX3 and MBL2, suggests a possible carcinogenic risk associated with chronic OP exposure. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying various neurocognitive and organ dysfunction symptoms associated with chronic OP exposure and emphasize the need for further research for the development of possible therapeutics and interventions to mitigate the adverse effects of OP poisoning.
Supplementary Material
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at *******.
Organophosphate_Proteomics_SI_V5: Principal component analysis for individual comparisons. A) Chronic exposure vs. control, B) acute exposure vs. control, C) chronic vs. acute exposure. The ellipsoids represent 99% confidence interval; Heatmaps with hierarchical clustering for chronic exposure vs. control. Upregulation is represented in red and downregulation is represented in blue. The top annotations represent the grouping with control being grey and chronic exposure dark red; Heatmaps with hierarchical clustering for acute exposure vs. control. Upregulation is represented in red and downregulation is represented in blue. The top annotations represent the grouping with control being grey and acute exposure light red; Heatmaps with hierarchical clustering for chronic exposure vs. acute exposure. Upregulation is represented in red and downregulation is represented in blue. The top annotations represent the grouping with control being dark red and acute exposure light red; Boxplots for proteins differentially expressed between all three comparisons (chronic vs. control, acute vs. control, and chronic vs. acute). *, pvalue < 0.05, **, pvalue < 0.01, ***, pvalue < 0.001; Canonical Pathways involvements of significant proteins for chronic exposure vs. control. Orange represents upregulation and blue represents downregulation. DHCR24 signaling pathway as predicted in chronic OP exposure vs. control. The downregulation of the pathway leads to an increase in cognitive impairment and the activation of the NFkB inflammatory pathway. Blue indicates predicted inhibition and orange indicates predicted activation. Boxplots displaying the abundance of peptides targeted for PRM analysis.
Acknowledgements
TOC figure and Figure 1 created with biorender.com.
Funding Sources
This project is supported by grants from the National Institute of Health (NIH) (1U01CA225753-05), (1R01GM130091-07), and Robert A. Welch Foundation (No. D-0005) and the CH Foundation.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Data Availability Statement
The raw mass spectrometry data from this study is publicly available on data dryad via the following link: http://datadryad.org/stash/share/MEFoRXnxYPFRVnXk-ek6BLPeWjb9-Axp4UDLPNC0xAI
References
- (1).Ore OT; Adeola AO; Bayode AA; Adedipe DT; Nomngongo PN Organophosphate pesticide residues in environmental and biological matrices: Occurrence, distribution and potential remedial approaches. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology 2023, 5, 9–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.enceco.2022.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Kaushal J; Khatri M; Arya SK A treatise on Organophosphate pesticide pollution: Current strategies and advancements in their environmental degradation and elimination. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2021, 207, 111483. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Vale A; Lotti M Organophosphorus and carbamate insecticide poisoning. Elsevier, 2015; pp 149–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Dar MA; Kaushik G; Villareal Chiu JF Pollution status and biodegradation of organophosphate pesticides in the environment. Elsevier, 2020; pp 25–66. [Google Scholar]
- (5).Akramipour R; Golpayegani MR; Sedighi M; Fattahi F; Fattahi N Determination of common organophosphorus pesticides in the blood of children with acute leukaemia using a double-solvent system as a novel extractant for dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. RSC Advances 2020, 10 (73), 44736–44742. DOI: 10.1039/d0ra09303c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Thompson HM; Walker CH Blood Esterases as Indicators of Exposure to Organophosphorus and Carbamate Insecticides. CRC Press, 2020; pp 37–62. [Google Scholar]
- (7).Gao B; Poma G; Malarvannan G; Dumitrascu C; Bastiaensen M; Wang M; Covaci A Development of an analytical method based on solid-phase extraction and LC-MS/MS for the monitoring of current-use pesticides and their metabolites in human urine. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2022, 111, 153–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2021.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Russom CL; Lalone CA; Villeneuve DL; Ankley GT Development of an adverse outcome pathway for acetylcholinesterase inhibition leading to acute mortality. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2014, 33 (10), 2157–2169. DOI: 10.1002/etc.2662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Costa LG Organophosphorus Compounds at 80: Some Old and New Issues. Toxicol Sci 2018, 162 (1), 24–35. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Colovic MB; Krstic DZ; Lazarevic-Pasti TD; Bondzic AM; Vasic VM Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors: Pharmacology and Toxicology. Current Neuropharmacology 2013, 11 (3), 315–335. DOI: 10.2174/1570159x11311030006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).McHardy SF; Wang H-YL; McCowen SV; Valdez MC Recent advances in acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors and Reactivators: an update on the patent literature (2012–2015). Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 2017, 27 (4), 455–476. DOI: 10.1080/13543776.2017.1272571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Sam C; Bordoni B Physiology, Acetylcholine. In StatPearls, 2024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Ireland D; Zhang S; Bochenek V; Hsieh J-H; Rabeler C; Meyer Z; Collins E-MS Differences in neurotoxic outcomes of organophosphorus pesticides revealed via multi-dimensional screening in adult and regenerating planarians. Frontiers in Toxicology 2022, 4. DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2022.948455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Robb EL; Regina AC; Baker MB Organophosphate Toxicity. In StatPearls, 2024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Fuhrimann S; Van Den Brenk I; Atuhaire A; Mubeezi R; Staudacher P; Huss A; Kromhout H Recent pesticide exposure affects sleep: A cross-sectional study among smallholder farmers in Uganda. Environment International 2022, 158, 106878. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Mostafalou S; Abdollahi M The susceptibility of humans to neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental toxicities caused by organophosphorus pesticides. Archives of Toxicology 2023, 97 (12), 3037–3060. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-023-03604-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Sánchez-Santed F; Colomina MT; Herrero Hernández E Organophosphate pesticide exposure and neurodegeneration. Cortex 2016, 74, 417–426. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Mishra A; Pandya H; Dave N; Mehta M Multi-organ dysfunction syndrome with dual organophosphate pesticides poisoning. Toxicology International 2013, 20 (3), 275. DOI: 10.4103/0971-6580.121682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Alvarez-Alvarez I; Andrade RJ Organophosphate pesticides: Another silent liver hazard? Liver International 2023, 43 (2), 268–270. DOI: 10.1111/liv.15492 (acccessed 2024/08/31). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Hulse EJ; Clutton RE; Drummond G; Thompson AP; Van Beek EJR; Smith SH; Eddleston M Lung injury caused by aspiration of organophosphorus insecticide and gastric contents in pigs. Clinical Toxicology 2022, 60 (6), 725–736. DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2022.2028803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Kuo H-S; Yen C-C; Wu C-I; Li Y-H; Chen J-Y Organophosphate poisoning presenting as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A clinical challenge. Journal of Cardiology Cases 2017, 16 (1), 18–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2017.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Wang A; Cockburn M; Ly TT; Bronstein JM; Ritz B The association between ambient exposure to organophosphates and Parkinson’s disease risk. Occup Environ Med 2014, 71 (4), 275–281. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Scalzo P; Kümmer A; Cardoso F; Teixeira AL Serum levels of interleukin-6 are elevated in patients with Parkinson’s disease and correlate with physical performance. Neuroscience letters 2010, 468 (1), 56–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.10.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Qiu X; Xiao Y; Wu J; Gan L; Huang Y; Wang J C-Reactive Protein and Risk of Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol 2019, 10, 384. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Lachine NA; Elnekiedy AA; Megallaa MH; Khalil GI; Sadaka MA; Rohoma KH; Kassab HS Serum chemerin and high-sensitivity C reactive protein as markers of subclinical atherosclerosis in Egyptian patients with type 2 diabetes. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2016, 7 (2), 47–56. DOI: 10.1177/2042018816637312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).SP K Sample Size Calculator. ClinCalc. 2024. https://clincalc.com/stats/samplesize.aspx (accessed 2024 Dec 19, 2024).
- (27).Masson P; Lockridge O Butyrylcholinesterase for protection from organophosphorus poisons: Catalytic complexities and hysteretic behavior. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 2010, 494 (2), 107–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2009.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Lockridge O; Norgren RB; Johnson RC; Blake TA Naturally Occurring Genetic Variants of Human Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase and Their Potential Impact on the Risk of Toxicity from Cholinesterase Inhibitors. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2016, 29 (9), 1381–1392. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Greig NH; Utsuki T; Ingram DK; Wang Y; Pepeu G; Scali C; Yu Q-S; Mamczarz J; Holloway HW; Giordano T; et al. Selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibition elevates brain acetylcholine, augments learning and lowers Alzheimer β-amyloid peptide in rodent. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102 (47), 17213–17218. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0508575102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Silver A The biology of cholinesterases. Frontiers of Biology 1974, 36, 426–447. [Google Scholar]
- (31).Judge SJ; Savy CY; Campbell M; Dodds R; Gomes LK; Laws G; Watson A; Blain PG; Morris CM; Gartside SE Mechanism for the acute effects of organophosphate pesticides on the adult 5-HT system. Chemico-Biological Interactions 2016, 245, 82–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2015.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Prioux-Guyonneau M; Coudray-Lucas C; Coq HM; Cohen Y; Wepierre J Modification of Rat Brain 5-Hydroxytryptamine Metabolism by Sublethal Doses of Organophosphate Agents. Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica 1982, 51 (4), 278–284. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1982.tb01027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Fernando JCR; Hoskins BH; Ho IK A striatal serotonergic involvement in the behavioural effects of anticholinesterase organophosphates. European Journal of Pharmacology 1984, 98 (1), 129–132. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(84)90118-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Ahmed ST; Steele L; Richardson P; Nadkarni S; Bandi S; Rowneki M; Sims KJ; Vahey J; Gifford EJ; Boyle SH; et al. Association of Gulf War Illness-Related Symptoms with Military Exposures among 1990–1991 Gulf War Veterans Evaluated at the War-Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC). Brain Sciences 2022, 12 (3), 321. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12030321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Dursa E; Barth S; Porter B; Schneiderman A Gulf war illness in the 1991 Gulf War and Gulf era veteran population: An application of the centers for disease control and prevention and Kansas case definitions to historical data. Journal of Military and Veterans Health 2018, 26 (2), 43–50, Journal Article. (acccessed 2024/09/01). [Google Scholar]
- (36).Upshall D Gulf Related Illness - Current Perspectives. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 2000, 146 (1), 13–17. DOI: 10.1136/jramc-146-01-03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Schulman IG Liver X receptors link lipid metabolism and inflammation. FEBS Letters 2017, 591 (19), 2978–2991. DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.12702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Spillmann F; Van Linthout S; Miteva K; Lorenz M; Stangl V; Schultheiss H-P; Tschöpe C LXR agonism improves TNF-α-induced endothelial dysfunction in the absence of its cholesterol-modulating effects. Atherosclerosis 2014, 232 (1), 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Joseph SB; Castrillo A; Laffitte BA; Mangelsdorf DJ; Tontonoz P Reciprocal regulation of inflammation and lipid metabolism by liver X receptors. Nature Medicine 2003, 9 (2), 213–219. DOI: 10.1038/nm820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Skerrett R; Pellegrino MP; Casali BT; Taraboanta L; Landreth GE Combined Liver X Receptor/Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ Agonist Treatment Reduces Amyloid β Levels and Improves Behavior in Amyloid Precursor Protein/Presenilin 1 Mice. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2015, 290 (35), 21591–21602. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.652008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Tavazoie MF; Pollack I; Tanqueco R; Ostendorf BN; Reis BS; Gonsalves FC; Kurth I; Andreu-Agullo C; Derbyshire ML; Posada J; et al. LXR/ApoE Activation Restricts Innate Immune Suppression in Cancer. Cell 2018, 172 (4), 825–840.e818. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Saijo K; Crotti A; Glass CK Regulation of microglia activation and deactivation by nuclear receptors. Glia 2013, 61 (1), 104–111. DOI: 10.1002/glia.22423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Ghisletti S; Huang W; Ogawa S; Pascual G; Lin M-E; Willson TM; Rosenfeld MG; Glass CK Parallel SUMOylation-Dependent Pathways Mediate Gene- and Signal-Specific Transrepression by LXRs and PPARγ. Molecular Cell 2007, 25 (1), 57–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Zelcer N Liver X receptors as integrators of metabolic and inflammatory signaling. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2006, 116 (3), 607–614. DOI: 10.1172/jci27883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Li N; Li Y; Han X; Zhang J; Han J; Jiang X; Wang W; Xu Y; Xu Y; Fu Y; Si S LXR agonist inhibits inflammation through regulating MyD88 mRNA alternative splicing. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.973612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (46).Blaschke F; Takata Y; Caglayan E; Collins A; Tontonoz P; Hsueh WA; Tangirala RK A Nuclear Receptor Corepressor–Dependent Pathway Mediates Suppression of Cytokine-Induced C-Reactive Protein Gene Expression by Liver X Receptor. Circulation Research 2006, 99 (12), e88–e99. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.0000252878.34269.06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Maejima Y; Sadoshima J SUMOylation. Circulation Research 2014, 115 (8), 686–689. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.114.304989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Flotho A; Melchior F Sumoylation: A Regulatory Protein Modification in Health and Disease. Annual Review of Biochemistry 2013, 82 (1), 357–385. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061909-093311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Desterro JMP; Rodriguez MS; Hay RT SUMO-1 Modification of IκBα Inhibits NF-κB Activation. Molecular Cell 1998, 2 (2), 233–239. DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80133-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Han X SUMOylation and deacetylation affect NF-κB p65 activity induced by high glucose in human lens epithelial cells. International Journal of Ophthalmology 2019, 12 (9), 1371–1379. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2019.09.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).Wagner T; Kiweler N; Wolff K; Knauer SK; Brandl A; Hemmerich P; Dannenberg J-H; Heinzel T; Schneider G; Krämer OH Sumoylation of HDAC2 promotes NF-κB-dependent gene expression. Oncotarget 2015, 6 (9), 7123–7135. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Yang Q; Tang J; Xu C; Zhao H; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Yang M; Chen X; Chen J Histone deacetylase 4 inhibits NF-κB activation by facilitating IκBα sumoylation. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology 2021, 12 (12), 933–945. DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjaa043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Riboldi GM; Faravelli I; Kuwajima T; Delestrée N; Dermentzaki G; De Planell-Saguer M; Rinchetti P; Hao LT; Beattie CC; Corti S; et al. Sumoylation regulates the assembly and activity of the SMN complex. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25272-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Wang S; Song R; Wang Z; Jing Z; Wang S; Ma J S100A8/A9 in Inflammation. Frontiers in Immunology 2018, 9. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (55).Miyashita D; Inoue R; Tsuno T; Okuyama T; Kyohara M; Nakahashi-Oda C; Nishiyama K; Fukushima S; Inada Y; Togashi Y; et al. Protective effects of S100A8 on sepsis mortality: Links to sepsis risk in obesity and diabetes. iScience 2022, 25 (12), 105662. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (56).Gragnano F; Sperlongano S; Golia E; Natale F; Bianchi R; Crisci M; Fimiani F; Pariggiano I; Diana V; Carbone A; et al. The Role of von Willebrand Factor in Vascular Inflammation: From Pathogenesis to Targeted Therapy. Mediators of Inflammation 2017, 2017, 1–13. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5620314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (57).Palta S; Saroa R; Palta A Overview of the coagulation system. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2014, 58 (5), 515. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.144643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (58).Andrews RK; Berndt MC Platelet physiology and thrombosis. Thrombosis Research 2004, 114 (5–6), 447–453. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (59).Michels A; Lillicrap D; Yacob M Role of von Willebrand factor in venous thromboembolic disease. JVS-Vascular Science 2022, 3, 17–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2021.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (60).Krychtiuk KA; Speidl WS; Giannitsis E; Gigante B; Gorog DA; Jaffe AS; Mair J; Möckel M; Mueller C; Storey RF; et al. Biomarkers of coagulation and fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a joint position paper of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care and the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis. European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care 2021, 10 (3), 343–355. DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (61).Todd M; McDevitt E; McDowell F Stroke and Blood Coagulation. Stroke 1973, 4 (3), 400–405. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.4.3.400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (62).Singh PK; Chen Z-L; Strickland S; Norris EH Increased Contact System Activation in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients with Impaired Short-Term Memory. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 2020, 77 (1), 59–65. DOI: 10.3233/jad-200343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (63).Hollenhorst MA; Tiemeyer KH; Mahoney KE; Aoki K; Ishihara M; Lowery SC; Rangel-Angarita V; Bertozzi CR; Malaker SA Comprehensive analysis of platelet glycoprotein Ibα ectodomain glycosylation. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2023, 21 (4), 995–1009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (64).Tischer A; Machha VR; Moon-Tasson L; Auton M Platelet-type von Willebrand disease: Local disorder of the platelet GPIbα β-switch drives high-affinity binding to von Willebrand factor. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2019, 17 (12), 2022–2034. DOI: 10.1111/jth.14597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (65).Schaaf CP; Koster J; Katsonis P; Kratz L; Shchelochkov OA; Scaglia F; Kelley RI; Lichtarge O; Waterham HR; Shinawi M Desmosterolosis—phenotypic and molecular characterization of a third case and review of the literature. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 2011, 155 (7), 1597–1604. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (66).Lu X; Li Y; Liu J; Cao X; Wang X; Wang D; Seo H; Gao B The membrane topological analysis of 3β-hydroxysteroid-Delta24 reductase (DHCR24) on endoplasmic reticulum. J Mol Endocrinol 2012, 48 (1), 1–9. DOI: 10.1530/jme-11-0132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (67).Bai X; Mai M; Yao K; Zhang M; Huang Y; Zhang W; Guo X; Xu Y; Zhang Y; Qurban A; et al. The role of DHCR24 in the pathogenesis of AD: re-cognition of the relationship between cholesterol and AD pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathologica Communications 2022, 10 (1). DOI: 10.1186/s40478-022-01338-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (68).Iadecola C; Duering M; Hachinski V; Joutel A; Pendlebury ST; Schneider JA; Dichgans M Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2019, 73 (25), 3326–3344. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (69).Lyra E Silva NM; Gonçalves RA; Pascoal TA; Lima-Filho RAS; Resende EDPF; Vieira ELM; Teixeira AL; De Souza LC; Peny JA; Fortuna JTS; et al. Pro-inflammatory interleukin-6 signaling links cognitive impairments and peripheral metabolic alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Translational Psychiatry 2021, 11 (1). DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01349-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (70).Sartori AC; Vance DE; Slater LZ; Crowe M The Impact of Inflammation on Cognitive Function in Older Adults. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 2012, 44 (4), 206–217. DOI: 10.1097/jnn.0b013e3182527690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (71).Singh-Manoux A; Dugravot A; Brunner E; Kumari M; Shipley M; Elbaz A; Kivimaki M Interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein as predictors of cognitive decline in late midlife. Neurology 2014, 83 (6), 486–493. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000000665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (72).Lord MS; Melrose J; Day AJ; Whitelock JM The Inter-α-Trypsin Inhibitor Family: Versatile Molecules in Biology and Pathology. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry 2020, 68 (12), 907–927. DOI: 10.1369/0022155420940067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (73).Hamm A; Veeck J; Bektas N; Wild PJ; Hartmann A; Heindrichs U; Kristiansen G; Werbowetski-Ogilvie T; Del Maestro R; Knuechel R; Dahl E Frequent expression loss of Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain (ITIH) genes in multiple human solid tumors: A systematic expression analysis. BMC Cancer 2008, 8 (1), 25. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (74).Wickramasekara RN; Morrill S; Farhat Y; Smith SJ; Yilmazer-Hanke D Glutathione and Inter-α-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 3 (Itih3) mRNA levels in nicotine-treated Cd44 knockout mice. Toxicology Reports 2018, 5, 759–764. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (75).Lerro CC; Koutros S; Andreotti G; Friesen MC; Alavanja MC; Blair A; Hoppin JA; Sandler DP; Lubin JH; Ma X; et al. Organophosphate insecticide use and cancer incidence among spouses of pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2015, 72 (10), 736–744. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (76).Pardo LA; Beane Freeman LE; Lerro CC; Andreotti G; Hofmann JN; Parks CG; Sandler DP; Lubin JH; Blair A; Koutros S Pesticide exposure and risk of aggressive prostate cancer among private pesticide applicators. Environmental Health 2020, 19 (1). DOI: 10.1186/s12940-020-00583-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (77).Bourdon J-C; Surget S; Khoury MP Uncovering the role of p53 splice variants in human malignancy: a clinical perspective. OncoTargets and Therapy 2013, 57. DOI: 10.2147/ott.s53876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (78).Toufektchan E; Toledo F The Guardian of the Genome Revisited: p53 Downregulates Genes Required for Telomere Maintenance, DNA Repair, and Centromere Structure. Cancers (Basel) 2018, 10 (5). DOI: 10.3390/cancers10050135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (79).Beckerman R; Prives C Transcriptional Regulation by P53. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2010, 2 (8), a000935-a000935. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (80).Li M; He Y; Dubois W; Wu X; Shi J; Huang J Distinct Regulatory Mechanisms and Functions for p53-Activated and p53-Repressed DNA Damage Response Genes in Embryonic Stem Cells. Molecular Cell 2012, 46 (1), 30–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (81).Su C; Lin Y; Cai L; Mao Q; Niu J Association between mannose-binding lectin variants, haplotypes and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: A case-control study. Scientific Reports 2016, 6 (1), 32147. DOI: 10.1038/srep32147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (82).Nirgude S; Choudhary B Insights into the role of GPX3, a highly efficient plasma antioxidant, in cancer. Biochemical Pharmacology 2021, 184, 114365. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (83).Zhu X; Wang J; Li L; Deng L; Wang J; Liu L; Zeng R; Wang Q; Zheng Y GPX3 suppresses tumor migration and invasion via the FAK/AKT pathway in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Transl Res 2018, 10 (6), 1908–1920. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (84).Dreher D; Junod AF Role of Oxygen Free Radicals in Cancer Development. European Journal of Cancer 1996, 32 (1), 30–38, Review. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00531-5 Scopus. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (85).Yu YP; Yu G; Tseng G; Cieply K; Nelson J; Defrances M; Zarnegar R; Michalopoulos G; Luo J-H Glutathione Peroxidase 3, Deleted or Methylated in Prostate Cancer, Suppresses Prostate Cancer Growth and Metastasis. Cancer Research 2007, 67 (17), 8043–8050. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (86).Yi Z; Jiang L; Zhao L; Zhou M; Ni Y; Yang Y; Yang H; Yang L; Zhang Q; Kuang Y; et al. Glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3) suppresses the growth of melanoma cells through reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α and 2-α. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 2019, 120 (11), 19124–19136. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.29240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (87).Lou W; Ding B; Wang S; Fu P Overexpression of GPX3, a potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer, inhibits progression of breast cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Cell International 2020, 20 (1). DOI: 10.1186/s12935-020-01466-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (88).Hu Q; Chen J; Yang W; Xu M; Zhou J; Tan J; Huang T GPX3 expression was down-regulated but positively correlated with poor outcome in human cancers. Frontiers in Oncology 2023, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.990551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (89).Li B; Ming H; Qin S; Zhou L; Huang Z; Jin P; Peng L; Luo M; Zhang T; Wang K; et al. HSPA8 Activates Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling to Facilitate BRAF V600E Colorectal Cancer Progression by CMA-Mediated CAV1 Degradation. Advanced Science 2024, 11 (3). DOI: 10.1002/advs.202306535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (90).Wang Y; Zhao M; Zhao L; Geng Y; Li G; Chen L; Yu J; Yuan H; Zhang H; Yun H; et al. HBx-Induced HSPA8 Stimulates HBV Replication and Suppresses Ferroptosis to Support Liver Cancer Progression. Cancer Res 2023, 83 (7), 1048–1061. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-22-3169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (91).Wu E; Wu C; Jia K; Zhou SA; Sun L HSPA8 inhibitors augment cancer chemotherapeutic effectiveness via potentiating necroptosis. Molecular Biology of the Cell 2024, 35 (8). DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e24-04-0194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (92).Ying B; Xu W; Nie Y; Li Y HSPA8 Is a New Biomarker of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Related to Prognosis and Immune Infiltration. Dis Markers 2022, 2022, 8446857. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8446857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (93).Thakur S; Sarkar B; Dhiman M; Mantha AK Organophosphate-pesticides induced survival mechanisms and APE1-mediated Nrf2 regulation in non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology 2021, 35 (2). DOI: 10.1002/jbt.22640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (94).Pandiyan A; Lari S; Vanka J; Kumar BS; Ghosh S; Jee B; Jonnalagadda PR Plasma pesticide residues–serum 8-OHdG among farmers/non-farmers diagnosed with lymphoma, leukaemia and breast cancers: A case-control study. PLOS ONE 2024, 19 (10), e0295625. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (95).Anjitha R; Antony A; Shilpa O; Anupama KP; Mallikarjunaiah S; Gurushankara HP Malathion induced cancer-linked gene expression in human lymphocytes. Environmental Research 2020, 182, 109131. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw mass spectrometry data from this study is publicly available on data dryad via the following link: http://datadryad.org/stash/share/MEFoRXnxYPFRVnXk-ek6BLPeWjb9-Axp4UDLPNC0xAI
