Abstract
Vascular inflammation, augmented vasoconstriction, reduced vasodilatory capacity, and endothelial dysfunction are cardinal features of the maternal vascular dysfunction phenotype in preeclampsia. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), bioactive molecules loaded with proteins, glycans, lipids, and nucleic acids, facilitate intracellular signaling and cell-to-cell crosstalk. Circulating EV concentrations rise throughout normal pregnancy; however, preeclampsia is characterized by a further increase in multiple types of EVs and a shift toward a pro-inflammatory, vasoactive cargo. Emerging evidence suggests that in preeclampsia, circulating EVs activate maternal endothelial cells, propagate vascular inflammation, and impair vascular tone and endothelial integrity, contributing to the development of hypertension and excess vasoconstriction. This review briefly introduces fundamental knowledge about EV biogenesis, morphology, and cargo selection, then focuses on current evidence on EV-induced endothelial inflammation and vascular dysfunction in pregnancies with preeclampsia versus uncomplicated pregnancies. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of engineered or stem cell-derived EVs to restore maternal vascular health in preeclampsia.
Keywords: Preeclampsia, microparticles, exosomes, endothelial function, vascular inflammation
INTRODUCTION
Preeclampsia is a multifactorial pregnancy-specific syndrome with unclear etiology and limited treatment options. It is diagnosed as new-onset hypertension with or without proteinuria with maternal end-organ damage after 20 weeks of gestation (1). Preeclampsia is associated with a high risk of maternal mortality during pregnancy. Moreover, women with a history of preeclampsia have a 3.6-fold increased risk of heart failure, a 2-fold increased risk of coronary heart disease or stroke (2), a 4-fold increased risk of chronic hypertension (3), and a 2-fold increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease (2, 4). Thus, the history of preeclampsia has a significant impact on maternal cardiovascular health during and after pregnancy.
The timing of preeclampsia diagnosis and symptom severity are significant determinants of the magnitude of short-term and long-term cardiovascular disease risk. As such, early onset preeclampsia (i.e., diagnosis at less than 34 weeks of gestation), poor outcomes, and diagnosis of preeclampsia with severe features have the strongest associations with premature and long-term cardiovascular disease (5).
Vascular inflammation, excess vasoconstriction, reduced vasodilatory capacity, and endothelial dysfunction encompass cardinal features of maternal vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia (6, 7). In some cases, vascular dysfunction develops before pregnancy and contributes to poor remodeling of the uteroplacental vascular network and impaired maternal cardiovascular adaptations to the increasing metabolic demands of pregnancy (8–10). In other cases, dysfunction of the maternal vascular system is a response to systemic inflammation and immune system overactivation due to interactions between circulating pro-inflammatory and vasoactive molecules and the maternal vascular system (11–13).
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are released by most tissues, packaging and transferring a bioactive cargo that facilitates interorgan and intercellular communication (14, 15). Characteristics of EVs, such as size, concentration, and mechanisms of release, differ in preeclampsia compared to healthy pregnancies (16, 17), suggesting a potential contribution of EVs to disease etiology and pathophysiology. Circulating EVs can influence maternal endothelial function and vascular tone either by engaging vascular cells locally or by modulating systemic signaling pathways. The primary objective of this review is to synthesize and critically evaluate the current literature on the role of EVs in maternal vascular dysfunction during preeclampsia. We begin with an overview of EV biology, highlighting their morphology, cargo composition, and mechanisms of biogenesis and release. We then discuss how EVs contribute to vascular inflammation and dysfunction in non-pregnant states, followed by an in-depth examination of their roles in healthy pregnancy and preeclampsia. Finally, we consider emerging evidence on the potential application of EVs in as therapeutic tools in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia.
OVERVIEW OF EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES
Morphology, cargo, and packaging
EVs are bioactive molecules that contain a diverse cargo of proteins, glycans, lipids, nucleic acids, and amino acids (reviewed in (18)). This cargo can elicit responses in recipient cells, mediating cell-to-cell communication and regulating intracellular processes such as cell proliferation and angiogenesis (19–31). The most frequently used terminology and differentiation for EVs is based on EV size and includes, but not limited to: exosomes (~30–160 nm (32, 33)), microparticles (also known as microvesicles; ~100–1000 nm (34)) and apoptotic bodies (~1000–5000 nm (35, 36)).
Exosomes form intracellularly through the endosomal route, which is initiated by inward invagination of plasma membrane, and they mature into late endosomes or multivesicular bodies (reviewed here (37–39)). Exosomal biogenesis involves two main pathways: an endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)-dependent process and an ESCRT-independent pathway (40). The ESCRT pathway is the primary mechanism of exosome formation and is associated with the activation of four protein complexes: ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II, and ESCRT-III (41). ESCRT-0 activation recognizes and captures cargo proteins, followed by membrane invagination and fission mediated by ESCRT-I to ESCRTIII (reviewed in (40)). The ESCRT-independent pathway involves lipid-, tetraspanin-, and RAB31-driven mechanisms (41–43). After formation, exosomes either fuse with lysosomes, leading to their degradation along with their contents, or fuse with the plasma membrane, releasing their contents into the extracellular space (40, 41, 44).
Microparticles (or microvesicles) form differently from exosomes. Their biogenesis involves outward budding of the plasma membrane, followed by shedding from the cell surface and release into the extracellular space (reviewed in detail here (45)). Microparticles arise from cholesterol-rich lipid rafts, and their shedding is reduced when membrane cholesterol is depleted (46). Microparticles can also form through an actomyosin-based membrane abscission mechanism regulated by ARF6-GTP-dependent activation of phospholipase D (47). Key factors affecting their formation and release include hypoxia, calcium, shear stress, high concentrations of extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP), ultraviolet B radiation and inflammatory cytokines and growth factors (48–51). Hypoxia-inducible factors activate RAB22A transcription and increase expression of small GTPase RAB22A, a protein that localizes with budding microparticles (49). In addition, depletion of endoplasmic reticulum calcium stores and blockage of store-operated calcium entry inhibit microparticle biogenesis (50), suggesting dependance on a calcium-calpain dependent pathway. ATP stimulation has also been shown to induce microparticles production, and these effects are mediated by functional P2X7 receptor (48).
Shear stress potentiates microparticle formation through activation of protein kinase C and binding of von Willebrand factor (vWF) to platelet glycoprotein lb, an event that mediates cleavage of actin binding protein by calpains. In addition, shear stress promotes activation of vWF binding to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa that subsequently induces the shedding of microparticles (52). Low shear stress stimulates microparticle release through increased activation of endothelial Rho kinases and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) and reorganization of cytoskeleton. On the other hand, physiological atheroprotective high shear stress prevents the release of microparticles by limiting phosphatidylserine exposure, resulting from release of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) and subsequent downregulation of ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 expression (53).
Numerous cytokines related to inflammation, such as interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin-4 (IL-4), as well as IL-6, IL-13, IL-23, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) have been shown to mediate microparticle release (48), indicating an association between inflammation and EV formation.
Apoptotic bodies are large vesicles, which are formed in the early stages of apoptosis. Early apoptosis is characterized by cell shrinkage and pyknosis, extensive plasma membrane blebbing, and subsequent packaging of cellular fragments into apoptotic bodies (54, 55). Caspase-3 activates Rho-activated serine/threonine kinase 1, and this process regulates actin-myosin filament assembly, cell contractility, and membrane blebbing through phosphorylation of the myosin light chain. Phosphorylation of myosin light chain then stimulates actomyocin contraction that contributes to delamination of the plasma membrane from the cytoskeleton membrane, leading to plasma membrane blebbing (56). Caspases also activate p21-activated kinase and LIM-kinase 1, which also induce cytoskeletal reorganization and membrane blebbing (reviewed in (56)). Once formed, apoptotic bodies are released into the extracellular space and degraded within phagolysosomes (57). The degradation of apoptotic bodies prevents harmful exposure of pro-inflammatory and immunogenic cargo and plays an important role in the resolution of inflammation (58). It is apparent, therefore, that EV formation and degradation are associated with both the induction, propagation, and resolution of inflammation, underlying the complexity of this relationship and its dependence on EV characteristics, type, and cargo.
Extracellular vesicles: endothelial inflammation and vascular effects
Circulating EVs may contribute to the development of inflammation on the vascular endothelium (59–62). Osada-Oka and colleagues demonstrated increased levels of microRNA (miR)-17, a negative regulator of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression, in serum-derived exosomes from rats with angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Levels of miR-145–5P, miR-221 and miR-222–5P that target plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) were not affected (59). Co-culture of these exosomes with human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) upregulated ICAM-1 and PAI-1, thus suggesting that exosomes may regulate ICAM-1 expression via miR-dependent mechanisms. These effects were primarily driven by exosomes derived from macrophages (59). Similarly, Tang et al. showed that small (<100 nm) exosomes from monocytes induced adhesion and proinflammatory factors, such as ICAM-1, C-C motif ligand 2 (CCL2), and IL-6 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (61). Exosome-induced expression of ICAM-1 and CCL-2 was, at least in part, driven by activation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) signaling (61), a key pattern-recognition receptor of the innate immune system (63).
These data suggest that the pro-inflammatory effects of exosomes on the vascular endothelium are linked to innate immune system activation. Indeed, monocyte-derived microparticles that are released from cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a potent activator of the innate immune system, induce phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and activate the nuclear factor-κB (NF-kB) pathway via downregulation of IκB-α and phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of p65 (a subunit of NF-kB). Also, those microparticles increased expression of NF-κB-dependent genes such as ICAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and E-selectin in HUVECs (60), an effect that was mediated by IL-1 receptor activation. This endothelial cell activation was linked to the presence of IL-1β, elevated levels of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and components of the inflammasome (i.e., NLRP3, caspase-1 p10 and inflammasome adaptor molecule ASC) in monocyte-derived microparticles (60).
In addition to miRNAs, several other EV cargo components can contribute to the regulation of inflammatory responses. For example, Hirsova et al. demonstrated that incubation of primary hepatocytes with palmitate or lysophosphatidylcholine increased the release of EVs containing TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, which in turn induced pro-inflammatory il-1β and il6 mRNA expression in macrophages (64). EV-associated lipids also play a role in intercellular communication (reviewed in (65, 66) and have been implicated in the development of inflammation (67). Esser et al. showed that exosomes derived from macrophages and dendritic cells contain enzymes involved in leukotrienes biosynthesis, a well-established proinflammatory lipid mediator (67). Together, these findings highlight that EV proteins and lipids, in addition to nucleic acids, can act as potent modulators of endothelial inflammatory responses.
Microparticle interactions with endothelial cells may be potent inducers of vascular disease. For instance, Gomez et al. previously showed that high-fat diet affects circulating levels and adhesion patterns of microparticles derived from neutrophils, platelets, and monocytes (62). Mice that were fed a Western diet for 6 weeks and treated with neutrophil-derived microparticles (~165 ± 7.5 nm) exhibited high deposition of these vesicles at the atheroprone regions of the aorta (62). These data suggest that neutrophil-derived microparticles adhere preferentially to atheroprone sites within arteries in conditions of hypercholesterolemia (62). In in vitro experiments, Gomez and colleagues modelled flow at atheroprone regions and flow at atheroprotected areas using oscillatory and high shear stress, respectively. Neutrophil-derived microparticles adhered more to HCAECs under oscillatory shear stress compared to high shear stress, (62). The oscillatory shear stress-mediated effect was due to high expression of ICAM-1 on the surface of HCAECs, and thus, application of anti-ICAM-1 antibody inhibited its adhesion. Moreover, under oscillatory shear stress conditions, those microparticles enhanced monocyte adhesion to HCAECs and promoted monocyte transendothelial migration toward the chemokine CCL2 on the surface of microparticles, effects that were mediated by CD18, a component of β2 integrins (62).
Neutrophil-derived microparticles can likewise induce inflammatory activation of HCAECs (62). Static (absent or low shear) and oscillatory (dynamic mechanical bursts) shear stress conditions confer distinct effects on the inflammatory response to neutrophil-derived microparticles. Specifically, under static conditions, neutrophil-derived microparticles favor upregulation of cytokines and adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-2) and release of monocyte chemoattractant CCL2 and neutrophil chemoattractant CXCL8 from HCAECs, promoting transient recruitment of monocytes and neutrophils. Conversely, under oscillatory shear stress, neutrophil-derived microparticles significantly increased the release of IL-6 and CXCL8 from HCAECs, while their effects on CCL2 was smaller compared to that observed under static conditions. IL-6 enhances endothelial cell activation and leukocyte adhesion, whereas CXCL8 maintains the recruitment of neutrophils, together orchestrating a chronic inflammatory environment that favors the formation of atherosclerotic plaques (62).
The pro-inflammatory effects of neutrophil-derived microparticles have been attributed, at least in part, to their miRNA cargo. miRNA are single-stranded, non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally (17, 68–72). These vesicles contain several miRNAs, including regulators of inflammation such as miR-9, miR-150, miR-155, miR-186, and miR-223. Once internalized, microparticles can lead to an enhanced endothelial expression of miR-155 that is associated with reduced expression of BCL6 (62), a basal and inducible inhibitor of NF-κB (73). These findings suggest that microparticles may contribute to endothelial inflammation through miRNA-mediated mechanisms.
In addition to their pro-inflammatory effects on the vascular endothelium, EVs impact vascular tone and reactivity and these vasoactive actions vary with the EV cellular source. Densmore et al. showed that endothelium-derived microparticles that were released from HUVECs upon stimulation with PAI diminished endothelium-dependent vasodilation in mouse facialis artery and human colon submucosal arterioles (74). These effects were attributed to reduced eNOS phosphorylation and disrupted interaction with heat shock protein 90 (74), leading to impaired eNOS phosphorylation at Ser1179 and reduced NO production. Free-radical scavengers did not alter these effects, excluding the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). These data demonstrated that endothelium-derived microparticles can affect the NOS pathway without invoking oxidative stress in mouse and human microvessels (74). Similarly, Brodsky et al. observed impaired aortic endothelial function after exposure to microparticles from rat renal microvascular endothelial cells (75). In contrast to the study by Densmore et al. (74), these effects were driven by both increased superoxide production and reduced NO production (75). Even though the parent cells were endothelial in both studies, the distinct mechanistic outcomes may be associated with their distinct organ-specific origin (i.e., kidney vs. umbilicus).
In a subsequent study, Good et al. reported that EVs (size range of <100 nm to 1000 nm) from normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats reduced endothelium-dependent vasodilation in normotensive resistance arteries but had no effect in arteries from spontaneously hypertensive rats (76). Inhibiting NOS with N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) decreased relaxation in control arteries but not in arteries from hypertensive rats, suggesting diminished involvement of the NO pathway in EV-mediated vascular dysfunction in hypertension. The anti-dilatory effects of EVs that were isolated from rats prior to development of hypertension but not after the establishment of disease led to the conclusion that alterations in EV effects on vascular function occurs during and after the development of hypertension. Thus, EVs may contribute to both the pathogenesis and the establishment of the disease. These findings highlight the importance of the disease environment in altering vesicle cargo.
Inflammatory activation of the endothelium alone is adequate to endow EVs with a distinct proinflammatory profile. Hosseinkhani et al. showed that endothelial cells treated with TNF-α released a mixed population of microparticles and exosomes that exhibit immunomodulatory content (77). Mainly, CD9, CD63 and ICAM-1 were enriched in EVs derived from TNF-α-stimulated HUVECs (compared to unstimulated cells). Also, those EVs had high expression of tumor necrosis factor receptor, TNF-α, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (a growth factor that is important for cytokine production (78)), proinflammatory IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8, anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-13, ICAM-, and chemokines CXCL-10, CCL-2 and CCL-5 (77). These vesicles mediated immune cell adhesion to HUVECs and promoted transendothelial migration, thereby confirming their role in the transfer of immune inducers across cells. Also, EVs upregulated ICAM-1, IL-6, IL-8, CCL-2, CCL-4, CCL-5 and IL-6 receptors in recipient HUVEC cells, thereby confirming that EVs derived from inflammatory environment can on their own trigger endothelial inflammation.
Complementary work by Chang et al. demonstrated that endothelial cells exposed to TNF-α or oscillatory shear stress became atherogenic (validated by the expressions of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1) and triggered inflammatory responses in macrophages manifested by upregulation of proinflammatory genes such as IL-6, IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (79). This response was associated with miR-92a, which was enriched within EVs (79). Increased levels of pri-mi-92a were found in endothelial cells but not in macrophages, while mature miR-92a levels were increased in both cell types. These findings suggested that biogenesis of miR-92a was likely absent in macrophages, and its transport from the atherogenic endothelium to macrophages was facilitated via an EV route. Functionally, EVs increased macrophage expression of TNF-α and IL-6, suppressed macrophage levels of anti-inflammatory CD163, and reduced Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) (79), a critical regulator of macrophage polarization (M1/M2) that suppresses proinflammatory genes in M2 macrophages and inhibits NF-κB transcriptional activity (80). Further analysis revealed that EVs from cytokine-pretreated endothelial cells enhanced macrophage secretion of IL-6, CXCL1, and complement component 5a and IL-1α (79). Together, these findings indicate that endothelial cells in atheroprone environments can package EVs with miR-92a and other inflammatory mediators, thereby indirectly propagating inflammation.
These studies illustrate distinct mechanistic pathways whereby EVs induce vascular dysfunction. The complexity of these molecular interactions reflects EV size, cellular origin, cargo composition, and disease environment. We still know little about how EV cargo changes in different disease states. Clarifying these cargo-specific mechanisms will be critical for developing therapies to counter EV-mediated vascular inflammation and dysfunction.
EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES IN HEALTHY PREGNANCY AND PREECLAMPSIA
Changes in EV concentration and cargo
Circulating EVs are essential for normal pregnancy progression due to their involvement in embryo implantation and development (81–84), immunomodulation (85, 86), maternal-fetal communication (87, 88), regulation of maternal vascular reactivity (89–97), and remodeling (98).
The concentration of circulating EVs is at least 3-fold greater in pregnant compared to the non-pregnant state and increases with the progression of gestation (99). Specifically, the concentrations of both total and placental alkaline phosphatase-positive (PLAP+) EVs rise at later stages of pregnancy, while in the first trimester, the concentrations of placenta-derived EVs are very low (100, 101). In addition, the EV cargo changes during healthy pregnancy, supporting immunosuppression. For example, exosome-like EVs (~145 nm) at 12 and 28 weeks of gestation carry higher amounts of the immunosuppressive cytokines IL-10 and transforming growth factor β1 compared to EVs from non-pregnant controls (102). These EVs are taken up by B cells and natural killer (NK) cells (102). Compared with EVs from non-pregnant controls, EVs from pregnant women enhanced caspase-3 activity in a cytotoxic subset of NK cells (102) known as CD56dim NK cells (103), promoting apoptosis. Because NK cell functionality is vital for maternal immune system adaptation, these findings suggest that EVs contribute to the immunosuppressive state of pregnancy via caspase-3-dependent apoptosis of cytotoxic CD56dim NK cells (102).
Circulating EV concentrations fluctuate in response to physiological stress, and such changes may reveal important differences between normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. Exercise provides a unique model to probe these responses. Abolbaghaei et al. found that moderate-intensity exercise reduces circulating levels of large EVs in non-pregnant participants, whereas these changes are absent in pregnant women (104). Conversely, focusing on small EVs (~ 10–120 nm), Mohammad et al. observed higher post-exercise levels of small EVs in pregnant women compared to non-pregnant controls (105). Although the functional importance of exercise-induced EV adaptations during pregnancy remains to be determined, exercise-derived EVs can exert antioxidant and cardioprotective effects in other contexts. For example, EVs (~70–200 nm) released after a single bout of endurance exercise increased glutathione peroxidase and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activities, decreased ROS and lipid peroxidation, and improved cell viability in young healthy men (106). Similarly, in mice, exosomes released after exercise increased endothelial cell survival under high glucose and hypoxic conditions via upregulation of miR-126 (107). These findings raise the possibility that pregnancy-related differences in exercise-induced EV release may influence maternal vascular resilience, and that such mechanisms could be dysregulated in preeclampsia.
Compared to normotensive pregnancies, pregnancies with preeclampsia are characterized by greater abundance of multilayer vesicles containing small vesicles, with a prevalent content of placenta-derived EVs (PLAP+-EVs (108)). EVs from pregnancies with preeclampsia are of similar size to EVs from normotensive pregnancies (99), while only one study has reported bigger diameter of exosomes in preeclampsia (107.5 nm) compared to healthy pregnancy (84.9 nm) (71). In contrast to similarities in size, the concentration of both small and large EV fractions and their protein content are elevated in preeclampsia (99, 108). Also, in preeclampsia, the biggest increase in EV concentration occurs in the first trimester, while dropping on the second and third trimesters (99). Nevertheless, EV concentrations remain higher in pregnancies with preeclampsia compared to healthy pregnancies throughout gestation (99).
Preeclamptic sera causes greater release of micro- and nano-EVs from placental explants compared to healthy controls (109), indicating dissimilar mechanisms of placental release of EVs in preeclampsia and healthy pregnancy. In addition, there are cargo differences in EVs from preeclamptic and healthy pregnancies. Compared to small EVs from healthy pregnancies, those from preeclamptic pregnancies (size < 200 nm) contain higher levels of miR-517c-3p and miR-519d-3p, and incubation of macrophages with these EVs increases macrophage miR-517c-3p levels (108). Moreover, Nejad et al. reported increased circulating cell-free levels of miR-517c-3p and miR-210–3p in preeclampsia (110); these miRNAs were linked to reduced cell proliferation and impaired trophoblast invasion (111, 112).
In addition to distinct cargo content, preeclamptic EVs display differential downstream effects when compared to EVs from normal pregnancies. Liu et al. reported that trophoblast-derived EVs from women with preeclampsia upregulated gene markers (i.e., IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6) in proinflammatory M1 macrophages and downregulated the anti-inflammatory endocytic receptor CD163 (113) compared with EVs from normal pregnancies (114). Interestingly, this effect was attributed to alterations in 37 lipid species in preeclamptic EVs that modulated classical inflammatory pathways in these macrophages (114).
Placenta-derived EVs have been proposed as biomarkers of preeclampsia. Jiang et al. reported that first-trimester serum levels of CD10-PLAP+ and CD63-PLAP+ small EVs were higher in women who later developed early-onset preeclampsia compared to those with normal pregnancies (115). These findings support that preeclampsia is associated with elevated EV levels and altered cargo, which may contribute to differential effects on the maternal immune and cardiovascular systems (Figure 1). Thus, EVs may serve as valuable early biomarkers for identifying women at risk for preeclampsia.
Figure 1.
Circulating extracellular vesicles mediate maternal vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia
Preeclampsia-associated stressors, such as hypoxia, oxidative stress, and inflammation, act on placental villi, triggering the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs) enriched with proinflammatory and vasoactive cargo (i.e., miRNA, DNA, cytokines). These EVs enter the maternal circulation, where they bind to and are internalized by vascular endothelial cells, leading to increased adhesion molecule expression, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Collectively, these effects promote endothelial inflammation, disrupt endothelial integrity, and impair maternal vascular function. EVs from the maternal vascular endothelium, other maternal organs, and circulating cells (i.e., immune cells; not shown in schematic) may also contribute to the circulating EV pool in preeclampsia. Additionally, EVs can potentiate the interactions between oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1 (LOX-1), as well as angiotensin II (Ang II) and its receptor (AT1-R), further amplifying EV release, reducing vasodilation, and enhancing vasoconstriction. HMBG1, High Mobility Group Box 1; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Created in BioRender. Goulopoulou, S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/ ewfykfy.
An interplay between placental- and maternal-derived EVs, along with their molecular cargo, has been implicated in the initiation and progression of the pathogenesis of preeclampsia (116). Elevated concentrations of endothelium-derived EVs have been linked to the development of systemic pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant states in preeclampsia. Similarly, erythrocyte-derived EVs, which are reported to be elevated in preeclampsia (117), exert potent pro-coagulant effects (reviewed in (118)) and may contribute to thrombosis. In addition, syncytiotrophoblast-derived EVs have been shown to enhance platelet activation (119), underscoring the systemic vascular consequences of placental EV release. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that multiple cellular sources of EVs contribute to the complex vascular pathology of preeclampsia.
Extracellular vesicles and endothelial cell inflammation
Previous studies in preeclampsia have reported an upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines: maternal plasma and choriodecidual blood IFN-γ, plasma IL-8 and IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP), and villous TNF-α, indicating systemic activation of the maternal immune system (120–124). Conversely, preeclampsia is associated with diminished anti-inflammatory signaling. Maternal IL-4 is reduced in plasma, while IL-10 is decreased in villous trophoblast cells, serum and plasma (121–123). Blood mononuclear cells from preeclamptic pregnancies secrete less IL-5, and maternal serum contains high levels of IL-17 (125, 126). Dong et al. further reported higher placental IL-2/IL-10 and TNF-α/IL-10 ratios in preeclamptic compared to uncomplicated pregnancies (127), indicating a T helper 1 (Th1)-dominant, proinflammatory shift in the maternal immune milieu, which characterizes preeclampsia. This systemic Th1 bias is mirrored, and is possibly amplified, by changes in circulating EVs.
Indeed, EV-mediated endothelial inflammation has been documented in pregnancies with preeclampsia. For instance, EVs from first-trimester placental explants that were exposed to preeclamptic serum upregulated ICAM-1 expression in endothelial cells and increased levels of the proinflammatory alarmin high-mobility group box 1 (109). Complementing these results, Ramos et al. demonstrated that microvascular endothelial cells exposed to sera supplemented with preeclamptic EVs exhibited greater ROS production, as well as increased expression of vWF and VCAM-1 compared to non-supplemented sera (128).
In non-pregnant states, the pro-inflammatory properties of monocyte-derived exosomes have been attributed, in part, to activation of TLR-4 signaling. This may also be relevant to preeclampsia, since TLR-4 has been involved in the induction of sterile inflammation and the development of pregnancy complications. Specifically, Mulla et al. reported that the TLR-4/MyD88 pathway mediates placental inflammatory responses in women with antiphospholipid antibodies, a population with high risk for pregnancy loss and late gestational complications, including preeclampsia (129). These effects were accompanied by increased secretion of IL-8, MCP-1, CXCL1α, and IL-1β (129). Furthermore, the same group in their later study demonstrated that TLR-4 is involved in the production of uric acid in human trophoblast that activates the Nalp3/ASC inflammasome and leads to IL-1β processing and secretion (130). Alterations in abundance and function of TLR-4 are associated with the development of preeclampsia. For instance, single nucleotide polymorphism in TLR-4 aggregate with early-onset preeclampsia (131). Moreover, Litang et al. have shown high serum levels of TLR-4 and NF-κB in patients with preeclampsia compared to normal pregnant group, thus suggesting it as a potential biomarker for predicting preeclampsia (132). Those results were also shown in monocytes and neutrophils from women with preeclampsia (133, 134). As such, by activating TLR-4, EVs potentially may induce endothelial inflammation in preeclampsia, however, further research is needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Collectively, these findings demonstrate that EVs originating, or conditioned by a preeclamptic environment drive a prooxidant, proinflammatory state in endothelial cells, with potential consequences for maternal vascular function and health.
Extracellular vesicles and vascular function
EVs released from normal and preeclamptic placentas have divergent effects on vascular tone, which may arise from engagement of a common molecular pathway that becomes differentially regulated in preeclampsia, leading to distinct vascular outcomes. Syncytiotrophoblast-derived EVs (STBEVs) from term, uncomplicated pregnancies reduce endothelium-dependent dilation in arteries from human subcutaneous adipose tissue and this effect has been attributed to endothelial disruption by deported microvilli (135). Spaans et al. confirmed a similar impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in late-pregnant mouse uterine arteries exposed to STBEVs isolated from normal human placenta (136). Authors linked the STBEV-induced impaired vasodilation to activation of the lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) and a reduced contribution of endothelial NO. Neutralizing LOX-1 with a blocking antibody preserved vasodilation and increased eNOS expression (136).
Independent evidence implicates LOX-1 in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia (137, 138). Maternal plasma from preeclamptic women upregulates LOX-1 expression and enhances uptake of oxidized, small-dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in HUVECs (138), effects reproduced in the reduced uteroplacental perfusion pressure (RUPP) rat model of preeclampsia (139). Plasma from these patients also elevated NADPH-oxidase activity and increased levels of superoxide and peroxynitrite in HUVECs, highlighting a redox-dependent component (138). It is noteworthy that oxidized LDL, which is increased in pregnancies with preeclampsia (140), can trigger the release of EVs, potentially perpetuating a vicious cycle (141). Together, these findings indicate that STBEV-driven vascular dysfunction in normal pregnancy converges on the LOX-1/eNOS pathway, which is impaired once pregnancy is complicated by preeclampsia and an environment of increased concentrations of small lipoprotein subfractions.
A previous study by Kao et al. reported vascular dysfunction caused by circulating factors in the plasma of patients with preeclampsia (142). Specifically, incubation of uterine arteries from pregnant rats with preeclamptic plasma resulted in increased superoxide production, impaired endothelial function, increased eNOS expression, and decreased iNOS expression (142). These effects were vascular bed-specific, as no functional alterations were observed in the mesenteric arteries, which represents the systemic circulation.
STEVBs, including microvesicles (323.2 ± 7.1 nm) and exosomes (89.3 ± 9.7 nm), from normal pregnancies express eNOS (but not iNOS) and can produce NO (143). In contrast, syncytiotrophoblast-derived exosomes from preeclamptic pregnancies exhibit reduced NOS activity, suggesting a contribution to the overall decrease in NO bioavailability (143). Supporting this, Murugesan et al. demonstrated that 48-hour incubation of mouse thoracic aortas with EVs derived from patients with preeclampsia reduced total and phosphorylated eNOS levels and impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation compared to EVs from normotensive pregnant women (90).
Similarly, Villalobos-Labra et al. showed that STEVBs from pregnancies with preeclampsia reduced the NO-mediated component of vasodilation in mesenteric arteries from late pregnant rats (89). Notably, inhibition of LOX-1 restored NO bioavailability, while treatment with superoxide dismutase or the NADPH-oxidase inhibitor apocynin rescued endothelium-dependent vasodilation (89). These findings further support the involvement of the LOX-1/NO/ROS signaling pathway in EV-induced reduction in vasodilatory capacity in preeclampsia.
While dysregulation of the LOX-1/eNOS pathway is a common theme, EVs also affect other vasoactive signaling pathways, sometimes enhancing and other times dampening contractile responses. Erlandsson et al. showed that preeclamptic STBEVs (50–450 nm) increased angiotensin II (Ang II)-mediated contraction and induced structural damage on human subcutaneous arteries via (AT1-R) (93). These effects were prevented by blocking vesicle uptake with chlorpromazine or neutralizing LOX-1, implicating LOX-1 and clathrin-mediated endocytosis in STBEV-AT1R interactions and their vascular effects (93).
In contrast, Tesse et al. observed that preeclamptic microparticles reduced vascular contraction to high potassium, phenylephrine (PE) and serotonin (5-HT) in late pregnant mouse aortas. This effect was accompanied by ~2-fold increase in NO production, elevated prostaglandin E2, and increased 8-isoprostane levels (144). Similarly, studies by Meziani et al. and Boisrame-Helms et al. reported reduced PE- and 5HT-induced vasoconstriction in human omental arteries and mouse aorta in response to EVs from patients with preeclampsia. These effects were associated with elevated iNOS expression, enhanced synthesis of 8-isoprostane and NF-κB p65 expression, increased oxidative stress (145, 146) and nitrotyrosilation, and decreased production of thromboxane A2 (146) and upregulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (145).
Supporting this multifaceted dysfunction, Sandoval et al. demonstrated that EVs from patients with preeclampsia downregulated the tight junction protein claudin 5 (CLDN5) in cultured endothelial cells. In vivo, RUPP dams exhibited posterior blood-brain-barrier disruption attributable to CLDN5 loss (147), likely mediated by CLDN5-targeting microRNAs (miRNAs) present within the vesicles. Collectively, these studies illustrate that EV-mediated vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia varies with vessel type, stimulus, and EV subtype.
Beyond vessel and stimulus-specific influences, the clinical subtype of preeclampsia further determines how circulating EVs affect the maternal vasculature. The time of diagnosis (early-onset vs. late-onset) is a significant determinant of maternal and fetal outcomes. Early-onset preeclampsia carries the greatest severity and worst perinatal outcomes, including fetal growth restriction, hemolysis, neurological complications, and severe cardiorespiratory, hematological, and fetoplacental complications (148). EVs isolated from placentas of early- vs. late-onset preeclamptic pregnancies exhibit distinct vasoactive profiles. Specifically, mesenteric resistance arteries from mice injected with EVs from early-onset preeclampsia displayed increased contractile responses to PE, Ang II, and endothelin-1 (ET-1), and reduced vasodilatory responses to acetylcholine (ACh) compared to arteries from mice treated with EVs from normotensive pregnancies (94). In contrast, EVs from late-onset preeclampsia elicited less pronounced pro-contractile effects. These functional differences mirror the hemodynamic profiles of the two preeclampsia subtypes. Early-onset preeclampsia is characterized by higher systemic vascular resistance and reduced cardiac output (10, 149), whereas late onset preeclampsia presents with lower systemic vascular resistance and increased cardiac output (10, 150). Placenta-derived EVs may therefore contribute to these divergent hemodynamic and vascular phenotypes of early and late-onset preeclampsia.
Although strong evidence links EVs to reduced vasodilation, impaired vasoconstriction, and barrier disruption in preeclampsia, direct mechanistic connections between EV-induced endothelial inflammation and overt vascular dysfunction remain to be elucidated.
EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES AS A POTENTIAL THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION IN COMPLICATED PREGNANCIES
Although EVs contribute to the development and progression of vascular dysfunction, they can also serve as therapeutic agents in preeclampsia. For instance, preeclampsia has been associated with lower levels of transcription factor cellular promoter 2 (TFCP2) (151) which has diverse functions, including embryonic development (152). Yang et al. showed that EVs derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (HUCMSC-EVs, 103 ± 30 nm) loaded with TFCP2, decreased apoptosis, activated the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in extravillous trophoblast cells, enhancing their proliferation, migration, and invasion (151). These findings indicated that TFCP2-enriched HUCMC-EVs could target preeclampsia-associated trophoblast deficits.
Building on this proof-of-concept, recent preclinical studies have tested HUCMSC-EVs in animal models. Yu and colleagues reported that HUCMSC-EV (100–200 nm) promoted cell proliferation and reduced the expression of inflammatory markers (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, IL-6) and endothelial cell injury markers (ET-1, tissue-type plasminogen activator and soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) in TNF-α or LPS-treated HUVECs, a cellular model of inflammation-induced endothelia dysfunction, a key contributor to preeclampsia (95). Moreover, administration of HUCMSC-EVs in a mouse model of preeclampsia reduced maternal hypertension and proteinuria, alleviated renal injury, and promoted placental vascularization (95).These benefits were correlated with increased arginine levels, higher NO content and NO synthase activity, and activation of the arginine metabolic pathway that indicates improved endothelial function. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was not tested in this study (95).
Similarly, Xiong et al. found that exosomes from HUCMSCs (with diameters of 30–100 nm) decreased blood pressure and urinary protein concentrations, increased litter size, preserved placental architecture and organelle function, increased microvascular density and serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, and reduced apoptosis and circulating levels of sFlt-1 in an L-NAME-induced rat model of preeclampsia (153). In this study, placentas from rats with preeclampsia-like phenotype exhibited marked ultrastructural abnormalities, including swollen mitochondria within the syncytiotrophoblast, increased mitochondrial vacuoles, and dilated endoplasmic reticulum. These changes were ameliorated following treatment with HUCMSC-derived exosomes. It is important to note, however, that these cellular observations were based on a small number of animals and were not validated using complimentary techniques. Collectively, while these findings suggest that HUCMSC-EVs may help preserve mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum integrity and represent promising candidates for preeclampsia therapy, they also underscore the need for confirmation across multiple models and methods.
Investigations are now leveraging vesicular cargo, particularly dysregulated miRNAs, to refine EV-based therapies. Cui and colleagues showed that EV-encapsulated miR-101, which is downregulated in preeclampsia, suppressed its targets, bromodomain-containing protein 4 and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11 (CXCL11), promoted trophoblast proliferation and migration via inhibition of the NF-κB/CXCL11 axis, and reduced blood pressure and proteinuria in vivo (154).
In parallel, Yang et al. demonstrated that restoring miR-18b, which is markedly reduced in placental tissue and HUCMSC-EVs from patients with preeclampsia enhanced trophoblast migration and proliferation in vitro, potentially through repression of Notch2 and downstream inhibition of the TIM3/mTORC1 signaling pathway (155). miR-18b-enriched HUCMSC‐EVs also reduced blood pressure, proteinuria, and placental apoptosis in L-NAME-treated rats with preeclampsia-like symptoms (155).
Collectively, these studies demonstrate that EV-based delivery, whether of intact vesicles or vesicles loaded with specific miRNAs, such as miR-101 and miR-18b, restores trophoblast function, reduces endothelial inflammation, and ameliorates preeclampsia-like symptoms in in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies. However, there are several safety concerns and limitations regarding the implementation of MSC-EV-based delivery into clinical practice. MSCs are well known for their reparative ability (156–158) and, as mentioned above, are proposed as a potential therapeutic intervention in complicated pregnancies in pre-clinical setting. However, safety concerns arise in its implementation in practice. For instance, cells can be transformed in the cell culture setting and express different morphological, physiological and functional properties (reviewed in (158)). Despite routine screening for certain types of viruses, MSCs may contain genetic material of other types of viruses and, in this way, induce an immune response. A number of studies show unpredictable side effects (159, 160) or no beneficial effects upon implementation of MSCs therapies (161, 162). Regarding side effects, Kuriyan et al. reported a case study where patients lost their vision after intravitreal injections of autologous adipose tissue-derived “stem cells” (159). Another study by Saraf et al. reported retinal detachment after bilateral intravitreal injections of “stem cells” in a patient with exudative macular degeneration (160). These studies raise concern about clinical significance of MSC therapies. Moll et al. raised concern regarding the implementation of MSC therapies in COVID-19 patients (163). Mainly, MSCs products express pro-coagulant tissue products, and in combination with COVID-19-mediated hypercoagulable state, those types of therapies may put patients at risk for the development of intravascular coagulation and other accompanying health issues. As such, the authors emphasize the importance of precise characterization of products with a robust manufacturing procedure. This is in line with work by Takakura et al., which raised the urgency for establishment and characterization of cell banks (164). This step is essential to confirm the identity of each cell type, and to test for the presence of specific marker molecules and expression of surface markers, as it is essential to maintain reproducibility and effectiveness of EVs production.
OPPORTUNITIES, METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS, AND PERSPECTIVES
Circulating EV concentrations rise with advancing gestational age in healthy pregnancies and increase even further in preeclampsia. Overall, EVs released during normal pregnancy have anti-inflammatory effects, whereas EVs from pregnancies with preeclampsia are enriched with proinflammatory, vasoconstrictive, and oxidative mediators that facilitate endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, and aberrant trophoblast function.
High-resolution characterization of EV cargo is highly promising in the development of new therapeutics for preeclampsia. Molecular “fingerprinting” can offer a minimally invasive readout of placental health and yield prognostic markers of evolving maternal cardiovascular dysfunction. A few studies have focused on the regulatory role of EV-contained miRNAs; yet other nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, and metabolites could also contribute to preeclampsia pathogenesis and warrant further investigation. In a previous study, we demonstrated that vesicle-encapsulated cell-free mitochondrial DNA, a pro-inflammatory damage-associated molecular pattern, is approximately 400-fold more abundant than the vesicle-free fraction in healthy pregnancy and greater than 1,000-fold more abundant in preeclampsia (165). Furthermore, gestational hypoxia selectively increased mitochondrial DNA loading into exosome-like EVs without altering vesicle size (166). Such cargo-specific signatures could enable early risk stratification and inspire cargo-editing strategies to restore maternal endothelial function.
To fully harness these opportunities, however, several methodological limitations must be addressed. First, there is a lack of uniform EV characterization across studies, with heterogeneity in isolation and analytical methods (see Table 1), which complicates cross-study comparisons. International guidelines on EV nomenclature and standardization provide an important framework that should be consistently implemented (167). Second, species differences remain a challenge: while bioassays using human biological fluids (e.g., plasma) as the trigger and animal tissues as the target provide mechanistic insights, the compatibility of EV effects across species—particularly in immune responses—requires careful interpretation. Third, some studies stimulate healthy tissues (e.g., vessels from healthy pregnant animals) with plasma EVs from patients with preeclampsia, a strategy that, although highly informative, may not fully recapitulate human pathophysiology.
Table 1.
Methods of characterization and tissue sources for extracellular vesicles.
| Citation | NTA | WB | TEM | FC | Tissue source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
|
| |||||
| Li et al., 2023 (101) | ✓ | CD63, TSG101 | Plasma | ||
|
| |||||
| Nardi et al., 2016 (102) | ✓ | Hsp70, ICAM-I, CD63, TSG101, CD9, CD81 Negative control: CYC1 |
Serum | ||
|
| |||||
| Mohammad et al., 2021 (105) | ✓ | TSG-101, flottilin-1; Negative control: calnexin |
✓ | Plasma | |
|
| |||||
| Lisi et al., 2023 (106)* | ✓ | ALIX, TSG101, Syntenin-1, APO A1 | ✓ | Plasma | |
|
| |||||
| Ma et al., 2018 (107) | ✓ | CD63, TSG101, CD34, VEGFR2 Negative control: Isotype-matched (IgG) nonspecific antibodies |
Plasma | ||
|
| |||||
| Winter et al., (108)** | ✓ | ALIX, TSG 101, CD63, PLAP, GAPDH, | ✓ | ✓ | Plasma |
|
| |||||
| Li et al., 2020 (71) | ✓ | CD63, CD9, TSG 101, PLAP | ✓ | ✓ | Plasma |
|
| |||||
| Xiao et al., 2017 (109) | ✓ | Placenta | |||
|
| |||||
| Liu et al., 2022 (114) | ✓ | CD9, TG101, PLAP | ✓ | ✓ | Placenta |
|
| |||||
| Ramos et al., 2024 (128) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Serum | |
|
| |||||
| Spaans et al., 2017 (136) | ✓ | ✓ | Placenta | ||
|
| |||||
| Maaninka et al., 2023 (141) | ✓ | CD41, CD63, CD9, TSG101 Negative control: calnexin |
✓ | ✓ | Platelets |
|
| |||||
| Motta-Mejia et al., 2017 (143) | ✓ | PLAP, ALIX, syntenin, CD9 | ✓ | Placenta | |
|
| |||||
| Murugesan et al., 2022 (90) | ✓ | CD63, flotillin 1, GM130, APO A1 | ✓ | Plasma | |
|
| |||||
| Villalobos-Labra et al., 2023 (89) | ✓ | PLAP, TSG101 Negative control: CYC1 |
✓ | Placenta | |
|
| |||||
| Erlandsson et al., 2023 (93) | ✓ | PLAP | Placenta | ||
|
| |||||
| Tesse et al., 2007 (144) | CD11, CD31 | Plasma | |||
|
| |||||
| Boisrame-Helms et al., 2015 (145) *** | Plasma | ||||
|
| |||||
| Sandoval et al., 2025 (147) | ✓ | HSP70, CD81, CD63, Alix, TSG101, PLAP | ✓ | Placenta | |
|
| |||||
| Lau et al., 2024 (94) bioRxiv. | ✓ | CD63, cytokeratin 7, vimentin Negative control: calnexin |
✓ | Placenta | |
EVs, extracellular vesicles; NTA, nanoparticle tracking analysis; WB, western blotting; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; FC, flow cytometry; Hsp70, heat Shock Protein 70; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; CYC1, mitochondrial protein cytochrome C; VE-Cadherin, vascular endothelial-cadherin; ALIX, ALG-2-interacting protein X; TSG101, Tumor Susceptibility Gene 101; APOA1, Apolipoprotein A1; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2; PLAP, placental alkaline phosphatase.
Characterization of EVs was also performed with
surface plasmon resonance imaging analysis
micro bicinchoninic acid assay
prothrombinase assay and a covalently coated streptavidin multiwell plate.
Fourth, the methodology of EV extraction and preparation can also impact their biological effects and represent a major limitation in data assessment and interpretation. For instance, Tannetta et al. evaluated differences in preparations of STBVs (i.e., placental perfusion vs. mechanical disruption) and their biological characteristics (168). They reported that PLAP+ mean fluorescence intensity was lower in mechanically prepared STBVs compared to placental perfusion preparations (168). Endoglin (CD105), a protein highly abundant on endothelial cells and placental syncytiotrophoblast and a prominent marker of preeclampsia (169–171), was not altered in mechanically prepared STBVs, whereas the perfusion method revealed decreased levels in preeclampsia (168). The authors speculated that placental perfusion more closely mimics in vivo conditions, as it maintains the integrity of the syncytiotrophoblast layer, whereas mechanical disruption introduces damage of the villous tissue. Thus, methodological choices in EV preparation should be carefully considered in experimental design and interpretation of results.
An additional consideration for therapeutic translation is whether EVs offer advantages over other drug delivery systems, such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and conventional intravenous infusion of drugs, miRNAs, or other bioactive molecules. EVs provide a natural delivery platform with the ability to protect their cargo from enzymatic degradation, extend circulation time, and facilitate uptake via receptor-mediated endocytosis. Compared to conventional approaches, EVs exhibit lower immunogenicity and toxicity while mimicking natural cell-to-cell communication. The potential use of patient-derived EVs further minimizes immunogenicity and reduces off-target toxicity (172). Nonetheless, challenges remain in controlling EV biodistribution, ensuring scalable production, and standardizing cargo loading methods. Importantly, the biodistribution of EVs to the placenta and fetus must also be taken into consideration. Addressing these issues will be critical to determine whether EV-based delivery truly surpasses traditional systemic administration in efficacy and safety for preeclampsia therapies.
Future work should focus on combining longitudinal clinical cohorts with preclinical studies that a) identify the tissue and cellular sources of EVs in preeclampsia, b) map temporal changes in EV cargo, c) test bioengineered or stem-cell-derived therapeutic EVs in preclinical models of preeclampsia. Transforming EVs from pathophysiological transporters into therapeutic tools could lead to biomedical applications of clinical-grade EVs as new therapeutic tools for preeclampsia, improving pregnancy outcomes and reducing maternal and offspring cardiovascular risk later in life.
Acknowledgments.
ChatGPT (v. 4.0) and Grammarly (v1.136.5) were used for grammar and syntax editing in portions of the paper. These tools were used in a manner that does not conflict with APS ethical policies, and the authors take full responsibility for the content.
Grants.
This study was supported by NIH R01 HL146562 (SG), AHA 24POST1198395 (NH) and the Dean’s Stipend Award from the School of Medicine, Loma Linda University (DE). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
ABBREVIATIONS
- ACh
Acetylcholine
- Ang II
Angiotensin II
- AT1-
Angiotensin II receptor type 1
- ATP
Adenosine triphosphate
- CCL2
C-C motif ligand 2
- CRP
C-reactive protein
- CLDN5
Claudin 5
- CXCL11
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11
- eNOS
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase
- ESCRT
Endosomal sorting complex required for transport
- ET-1
Endothelin-1
- ERK1/2
Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2
- EVs
Extracellular vesicles
- HCAECs
Human coronary artery endothelial cells
- HUCMSC(s)
Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell(s)
- HUVECs
Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
- iNOS
Inducible nitric oxide synthase
- ICAM-1
Intercellular adhesion molecule-1
- IFN-γ
Interferon gamma
- IL
Interleukin
- KLF4
Krüppel-like factor 4
- LOX-1
Lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1
- LDL
Low-density lipoprotein
- LPS
Lipopolysaccharide
- miRNA
MicroRNA
- NK
Natural Killer
- NO
Nitric oxide
- L-NAME
N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
- NF-kB
Nuclear factor-κB
- PE
Phenylephrine
- PLAP
Placental alkaline phosphatase
- PAI-1
Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- RUPP
Reduced uteroplacental perfusion pressure
- sFlt-1
Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1
- STBEVs
Syncytiotrophoblast extracellular vesicles
- Th1
T helper 1
- TFCP2
Transcription factor CP2
- TGF-β
Transforming growth factor beta
- VCAM-1
Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1
- vWF
von Willebrand factor
Footnotes
Disclosures. No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).
REFERENCES
- 1.Zakiyah N, Postma MJ, Baker PN, van Asselt AD, Consortium IM. Pre-eclampsia Diagnosis and Treatment Options: A Review of Published Economic Assessments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(10):1069–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wu P, Haththotuwa R, Kwok CS, Babu A, Kotronias RA, Rushton C, et al. Preeclampsia and Future Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(2). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hassdenteufel K, Muller M, Gutsfeld R, Goetz M, Bauer A, Wallwiener M, et al. Long-term effects of preeclampsia on maternal cardiovascular health and postpartum utilization of primary care: an observational claims data study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(1):275–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Meng ML, Frere Z, Fuller M, Li YJ, Habib AS, Federspiel JJ, et al. Maternal Cardiovascular Morbidity Events Following Preeclampsia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesth Analg. 2023;136(4):728–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yang C, Baker PN, Granger JP, Davidge ST, Tong C. Long-Term Impacts of Preeclampsia on the Cardiovascular System of Mother and Offspring. Hypertension. 2023;80(9):1821–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Enkhmaa D, Wall D, Mehta PK, Stuart JJ, Rich-Edwards JW, Merz CN, et al. Preeclampsia and Vascular Function: A Window to Future Cardiovascular Disease Risk. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016;25(3):284–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tomimatsu T, Mimura K, Matsuzaki S, Endo M, Kumasawa K, Kimura T. Preeclampsia: Maternal Systemic Vascular Disorder Caused by Generalized Endothelial Dysfunction Due to Placental Antiangiogenic Factors. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(17). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Espinoza J Uteroplacental ischemia in early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia: a role for the fetus? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(4):373–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hu X, Zhang L. Uteroplacental Circulation in Normal Pregnancy and Preeclampsia: Functional Adaptation and Maladaptation. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(16). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Gagliardi G, Novelli GP. Early and late preeclampsia: two different maternal hemodynamic states in the latent phase of the disease. Hypertension. 2008;52(5):873–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Das UN. Cytokines, angiogenic, and antiangiogenic factors and bioactive lipids in preeclampsia. Nutrition. 2015;31(9):1083–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lamarca B The role of immune activation in contributing to vascular dysfunction and the pathophysiology of hypertension during preeclampsia. Minerva Ginecol. 2010;62(2):105–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cornelius DC, Cottrell J, Amaral LM, LaMarca B. Inflammatory mediators: a causal link to hypertension during preeclampsia. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176(12):1914–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu YJ, Wang C. A review of the regulatory mechanisms of extracellular vesicles-mediated intercellular communication. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mo W, Peng Y, Zheng Y, Zhao S, Deng L, Fan X. Extracellular vesicle-mediated bidirectional communication between the liver and other organs: mechanistic exploration and prospects for clinical applications. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23(1):190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Knight M, Redman CW, Linton EA, Sargent IL. Shedding of syncytiotrophoblast microvilli into the maternal circulation in pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(6):632–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ghosh S, Thamotharan S, Fong J, Lei MYY, Janzen C, Devaskar SU. Circulating extracellular vesicular microRNA signatures in early gestation show an association with subsequent clinical features of pre-eclampsia. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):16770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dixson AC, Dawson TR, Di Vizio D, Weaver AM. Context-specific regulation of extracellular vesicle biogenesis and cargo selection. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24(7):454–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Couch Y, Buzas EI, Di Vizio D, Gho YS, Harrison P, Hill AF, et al. A brief history of nearly EV-erything - The rise and rise of extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles. 2021;10(14):e12144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pitt JM, Kroemer G, Zitvogel L. Extracellular vesicles: masters of intercellular communication and potential clinical interventions. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(4):1139–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bayraktar R, Van Roosbroeck K, Calin GA. Cell-to-cell communication: microRNAs as hormones. Mol Oncol. 2017;11(12):1673–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hyenne V, Ghoroghi S, Collot M, Bons J, Follain G, Harlepp S, et al. Studying the Fate of Tumor Extracellular Vesicles at High Spatiotemporal Resolution Using the Zebrafish Embryo. Dev Cell. 2019;48(4):554–72 e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Souza W, Barrias ES. Membrane-bound extracellular vesicles secreted by parasitic protozoa: cellular structures involved in the communication between cells. Parasitol Res. 2020;119(7):2005–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Avalos PN, Wong LL, Forsthoefel DJ. Extracellular vesicles promote proliferation in an animal model of regeneration. bioRxiv. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ateeq M, Broadwin M, Sellke FW, Abid MR. Extracellular Vesicles’ Role in Angiogenesis and Altering Angiogenic Signaling. Med Sci (Basel). 2024;12(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kakarla R, Hur J, Kim YJ, Kim J, Chwae YJ. Apoptotic cell-derived exosomes: messages from dying cells. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(1):1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee SS, Won JH, Lim GJ, Han J, Lee JY, Cho KO, et al. A novel population of extracellular vesicles smaller than exosomes promotes cell proliferation. Cell Commun Signal. 2019;17(1):95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lopez K, Lai SWT, Lopez Gonzalez EJ, Davila RG, Shuck SC. Extracellular vesicles: A dive into their role in the tumor microenvironment and cancer progression. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1154576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yan W, Cao M, Ruan X, Jiang L, Lee S, Lemanek A, et al. Cancer-cell-secreted miR-122 suppresses O-GlcNAcylation to promote skeletal muscle proteolysis. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24(5):793–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cao M, Isaac R, Yan W, Ruan X, Jiang L, Wan Y, et al. Cancer-cell-secreted extracellular vesicles suppress insulin secretion through miR-122 to impair systemic glucose homeostasis and contribute to tumour growth. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24(6):954–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao S, Mi Y, Zheng B, Wei P, Gu Y, Zhang Z, et al. Highly-metastatic colorectal cancer cell released miR-181a-5p-rich extracellular vesicles promote liver metastasis by activating hepatic stellate cells and remodelling the tumour microenvironment. J Extracell Vesicles. 2022;11(1):e12186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020;367(6478). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Colombo M, Raposo G, Thery C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:255–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stahl AL, Johansson K, Mossberg M, Kahn R, Karpman D. Exosomes and microvesicles in normal physiology, pathophysiology, and renal diseases. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;34(1):11–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hristov M, Erl W, Linder S, Weber PC. Apoptotic bodies from endothelial cells enhance the number and initiate the differentiation of human endothelial progenitor cells in vitro. Blood. 2004;104(9):2761–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jeppesen DK, Fenix AM, Franklin JL, Higginbotham JN, Zhang Q, Zimmerman LJ, et al. Reassessment of Exosome Composition. Cell. 2019;177(2):428–45 e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gurung S, Perocheau D, Touramanidou L, Baruteau J. The exosome journey: from biogenesis to uptake and intracellular signalling. Cell Commun Signal. 2021;19(1):47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Samanta S, Rajasingh S, Drosos N, Zhou Z, Dawn B, Rajasingh J. Exosomes: new molecular targets of diseases. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2018;39(4):501–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gurunathan S, Kang MH, Kim JH. A Comprehensive Review on Factors Influences Biogenesis, Functions, Therapeutic and Clinical Implications of Exosomes. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:1281–312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Han QF, Li WJ, Hu KS, Gao J, Zhai WL, Yang JH, et al. Exosome biogenesis: machinery, regulation, and therapeutic implications in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2022;21(1):207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lee YJ, Shin KJ, Chae YC. Regulation of cargo selection in exosome biogenesis and its biomedical applications in cancer. Exp Mol Med. 2024;56(4):877–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tschuschke M, Kocherova I, Bryja A, Mozdziak P, Angelova Volponi A, Janowicz K, et al. Inclusion Biogenesis, Methods of Isolation and Clinical Application of Human Cellular Exosomes. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wei D, Zhan W, Gao Y, Huang L, Gong R, Wang W, et al. RAB31 marks and controls an ESCRT-independent exosome pathway. Cell Res. 2021;31(2):157–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Akers JC, Gonda D, Kim R, Carter BS, Chen CC. Biogenesis of extracellular vesicles (EV): exosomes, microvesicles, retrovirus-like vesicles, and apoptotic bodies. J Neurooncol. 2013;113(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Clancy JW, Schmidtmann M, D’Souza-Schorey C. The ins and outs of microvesicles. FASEB Bioadv. 2021;3(6):399–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Del Conde I, Shrimpton CN, Thiagarajan P, Lopez JA. Tissue-factor-bearing microvesicles arise from lipid rafts and fuse with activated platelets to initiate coagulation. Blood. 2005;106(5):1604–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Muralidharan-Chari V, Clancy J, Plou C, Romao M, Chavrier P, Raposo G, et al. ARF6-regulated shedding of tumor cell-derived plasma membrane microvesicles. Curr Biol. 2009;19(22):1875–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Colombo F, Bastoni M, Nigro A, Podini P, Finardi A, Casella G, et al. Cytokines Stimulate the Release of Microvesicles from Myeloid Cells Independently from the P2X7 Receptor/Acid Sphingomyelinase Pathway. Front Immunol. 2018;9:204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang T, Gilkes DM, Takano N, Xiang L, Luo W, Bishop CJ, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors and RAB22A mediate formation of microvesicles that stimulate breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(31):E3234–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Taylor J, Azimi I, Monteith G, Bebawy M. Ca(2+) mediates extracellular vesicle biogenesis through alternate pathways in malignancy. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;9(1):1734326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Frommeyer TC, Gilbert MM, Brittain GV, Wu T, Nguyen TQ, Rohan CA, et al. UVB-Induced Microvesicle Particle Release and Its Effects on the Cutaneous Microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2022;13:880850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Miyazaki Y, Nomura S, Miyake T, Kagawa H, Kitada C, Taniguchi H, et al. High shear stress can initiate both platelet aggregation and shedding of procoagulant containing microparticles. Blood. 1996;88(9):3456–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Vion AC, Ramkhelawon B, Loyer X, Chironi G, Devue C, Loirand G, et al. Shear stress regulates endothelial microparticle release. Circ Res. 2013;112(10):1323–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Elmore S Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(4):495–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ihara T, Yamamoto T, Sugamata M, Okumura H, Ueno Y. The process of ultrastructural changes from nuclei to apoptotic body. Virchows Arch. 1998;433(5):443–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang Y, Chen X, Gueydan C, Han J. Plasma membrane changes during programmed cell deaths. Cell Res. 2018;28(1):9–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Maderna P, Godson C. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and the resolution of inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1639(3):141–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kourtzelis I, Hajishengallis G, Chavakis T. Phagocytosis of Apoptotic Cells in Resolution of Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2020;11:553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Osada-Oka M, Shiota M, Izumi Y, Nishiyama M, Tanaka M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Macrophage-derived exosomes induce inflammatory factors in endothelial cells under hypertensive conditions. Hypertens Res. 2017;40(4):353–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang JG, Williams JC, Davis BK, Jacobson K, Doerschuk CM, Ting JP, et al. Monocytic microparticles activate endothelial cells in an IL-1beta-dependent manner. Blood. 2011;118(8):2366–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tang N, Sun B, Gupta A, Rempel H, Pulliam L. Monocyte exosomes induce adhesion molecules and cytokines via activation of NF-kappaB in endothelial cells. FASEB J. 2016;30(9):3097–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gomez I, Ward B, Souilhol C, Recarti C, Ariaans M, Johnston J, et al. Neutrophil microvesicles drive atherosclerosis by delivering miR-155 to atheroprone endothelium. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kuzmich NN, Sivak KV, Chubarev VN, Porozov YB, Savateeva-Lyubimova TN, Peri F. TLR4 Signaling Pathway Modulators as Potential Therapeutics in Inflammation and Sepsis. Vaccines (Basel). 2017;5(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hirsova P, Ibrahim SH, Krishnan A, Verma VK, Bronk SF, Werneburg NW, et al. Lipid-Induced Signaling Causes Release of Inflammatory Extracellular Vesicles From Hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(4):956–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ghadami S, Dellinger K. The lipid composition of extracellular vesicles: applications in diagnostics and therapeutic delivery. Front Mol Biosci. 2023;10:1198044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Fyfe J, Casari I, Manfredi M, Falasca M. Role of lipid signalling in extracellular vesicles-mediated cell-to-cell communication. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2023;73:20–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Esser J, Gehrmann U, D’Alexandri FL, Hidalgo-Estevez AM, Wheelock CE, Scheynius A, et al. Exosomes from human macrophages and dendritic cells contain enzymes for leukotriene biosynthesis and promote granulocyte migration. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(5):1032–40, 40 e1–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cirkovic A, Stanisavljevic D, Milin-Lazovic J, Rajovic N, Pavlovic V, Milicevic O, et al. Preeclamptic Women Have Disrupted Placental microRNA Expression at the Time of Preeclampsia Diagnosis: Meta-Analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:782845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bao S, Zhou T, Yan C, Bao J, Yang F, Chao S, et al. A blood-based miRNA signature for early non-invasive diagnosis of preeclampsia. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bounds KR, Chiasson VL, Pan LJ, Gupta S, Chatterjee P. MicroRNAs: New Players in the Pathobiology of Preeclampsia. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2017;4:60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Li H, Ouyang Y, Sadovsky E, Parks WT, Chu T, Sadovsky Y. Unique microRNA Signals in Plasma Exosomes from Pregnancies Complicated by Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2020;75(3):762–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Motawi TMK, Sabry D, Maurice NW, Rizk SM. Role of mesenchymal stem cells exosomes derived microRNAs; miR-136, miR-494 and miR-495 in pre-eclampsia diagnosis and evaluation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2018;659:13–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Barish GD, Yu RT, Karunasiri M, Ocampo CB, Dixon J, Benner C, et al. Bcl-6 and NF-kappaB cistromes mediate opposing regulation of the innate immune response. Genes Dev. 2010;24(24):2760–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Densmore JC, Signorino PR, Ou J, Hatoum OA, Rowe JJ, Shi Y, et al. Endothelium-derived microparticles induce endothelial dysfunction and acute lung injury. Shock. 2006;26(5):464–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Brodsky SV, Zhang F, Nasjletti A, Goligorsky MS. Endothelium-derived microparticles impair endothelial function in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286(5):H1910–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Good ME, Musante L, La Salvia S, Howell NL, Carey RM, Le TH, et al. Circulating Extracellular Vesicles in Normotension Restrain Vasodilation in Resistance Arteries. Hypertension. 2020;75(1):218–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hosseinkhani B, Kuypers S, van den Akker NMS, Molin DGM, Michiels L. Extracellular Vesicles Work as a Functional Inflammatory Mediator Between Vascular Endothelial Cells and Immune Cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lee KMC, Achuthan AA, Hamilton JA. GM-CSF: A Promising Target in Inflammation and Autoimmunity. Immunotargets Ther. 2020;9:225–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Chang YJ, Li YS, Wu CC, Wang KC, Huang TC, Chen Z, et al. Extracellular MicroRNA-92a Mediates Endothelial Cell-Macrophage Communication. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(12):2492–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Liao X, Sharma N, Kapadia F, Zhou G, Lu Y, Hong H, et al. Kruppel-like factor 4 regulates macrophage polarization. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2736–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kurian NK, Modi D. Extracellular vesicle mediated embryo-endometrial cross talk during implantation and in pregnancy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(2):189–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mishra A, Ashary N, Sharma R, Modi D. Extracellular vesicles in embryo implantation and disorders of the endometrium. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2021;85(2):e13360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Paul N, Sultana Z, Fisher JJ, Maiti K, Smith R. Extracellular vesicles- crucial players in human pregnancy. Placenta. 2023;140:30–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Xue Y, Zheng H, Xiong Y, Li K. Extracellular vesicles affecting embryo development in vitro: a potential culture medium supplement. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1366992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Stenqvist AC, Nagaeva O, Baranov V, Mincheva-Nilsson L. Exosomes secreted by human placenta carry functional Fas ligand and TRAIL molecules and convey apoptosis in activated immune cells, suggesting exosome-mediated immune privilege of the fetus. J Immunol. 2013;191(11):5515–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kovacs AF, Fekete N, Turiak L, Acs A, Kohidai L, Buzas EI, et al. Unravelling the Role of Trophoblastic-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Regulatory T Cell Differentiation. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(14). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Martin C, Bergamelli M, Malnou CE, D’Angelo G. Placental extracellular vesicles in maternal-fetal communication during pregnancy. Biochem Soc Trans. 2022;50(6):1785–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Buca D, Bologna G, D’Amico A, Cugini S, Musca F, Febbo M, et al. Extracellular Vesicles in Feto-Maternal Crosstalk and Pregnancy Disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Villalobos-Labra R, Liu R, Spaans F, Saez T, Semeria Maitret T, Quon A, et al. Placenta-Derived Extracellular Vesicles From Preeclamptic Pregnancies Impair Vascular Endothelial Function via Lectin-Like Oxidized LDL Receptor-1. Hypertension. 2023;80(10):2226–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Murugesan S, Hussey H, Saravanakumar L, Sinkey RG, Sturdivant AB, Powell MF, et al. Extracellular Vesicles From Women With Severe Preeclampsia Impair Vascular Endothelial Function. Anesth Analg. 2022;134(4):713–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Murugesan S, Addis DR, Hussey H, Powell MF, Saravanakumar L, Sturdivant AB, et al. Decreased Extracellular Vesicle Vasorin in Severe Preeclampsia Plasma Mediates Endothelial Dysfunction. bioRxiv. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Powell JS, Gandley RE, Lackner E, Dolinish A, Ouyang Y, Powers RW, et al. Small extracellular vesicles from plasma of women with preeclampsia increase myogenic tone and decrease endothelium-dependent relaxation of mouse mesenteric arteries. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022;28:66–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Erlandsson L, Ohlsson L, Masoumi Z, Rehnstrom M, Cronqvist T, Edvinsson L, et al. Preliminary evidence that blocking the uptake of placenta-derived preeclamptic extracellular vesicles protects the vascular endothelium and prevents vasoconstriction. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):18425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Lau SY, Groom K, Hisey CL, Chen Q, Barrett C, Chamley L. Placental extracellular vesicles from early-onset but not late-onset preeclampsia induce a pro-vasoconstrictive and anti-vasodilatory state in resistance arteries. bioRxiv. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Yu Z, Zhang W, Wang Y, Gao M, Zhang M, Yao D, et al. Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Human Umbilical Cord MSC Improve Vascular Endothelial Function in In Vitro and In Vivo Models of Preeclampsia through Activating Arginine Metabolism. Mol Pharm. 2023;20(12):6429–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Sandoval H, Ibañez B, Contreras M, Troncoso F, Castro FO, Caamaño D, et al. Extracellular vesicles from preeclampsia disrupt the blood-brain barrier via reduced claudin-5: potential role of vascular endothelial growth factor. bioRxiv. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Leon J, Acurio J, Bergman L, Lopez J, Karin Wikstrom A, Torres-Vergara P, et al. Disruption of the Blood-Brain Barrier by Extracellular Vesicles From Preeclampsia Plasma and Hypoxic Placentae: Attenuation by Magnesium Sulfate. Hypertension. 2021;78(5):1423–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Salomon C, Yee SW, Mitchell MD, Rice GE. The possible role of extravillous trophoblast-derived exosomes on the uterine spiral arterial remodeling under both normal and pathological conditions. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:693157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Barnes MVC, Pantazi P, Holder B. Circulating extracellular vesicles in healthy and pathological pregnancies: A scoping review of methodology, rigour and results. J Extracell Vesicles. 2023;12(11):e12377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Germain SJ, Sacks GP, Sooranna SR, Sargent IL, Redman CW. Systemic inflammatory priming in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia: the role of circulating syncytiotrophoblast microparticles. J Immunol. 2007;178(9):5949–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Li Z, Tao M, Huang M, Pan W, Huang Q, Wang P, et al. Quantification of placental extracellular vesicles in different pregnancy status via single particle analysis method. Clin Chim Acta. 2023;539:266–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Nardi Fda S, Michelon TF, Neumann J, Manvailer LF, Wagner B, Horn PA, et al. High levels of circulating extracellular vesicles with altered expression and function during pregnancy. Immunobiology. 2016;221(7):753–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Cooper MA, Fehniger TA, Caligiuri MA. The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends Immunol. 2001;22(11):633–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Abolbaghaei A, Mohammad S, da Silva DF, Hutchinson KA, Myette RL, Adamo KB, et al. Impact of acute moderate-intensity aerobic exercise on circulating extracellular vesicles in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2023;48(2):198–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Mohammad S, Hutchinson KA, da Silva DF, Bhattacharjee J, McInnis K, Burger D, et al. Circulating small extracellular vesicles increase after an acute bout of moderate-intensity exercise in pregnant compared to non-pregnant women. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):12615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Lisi V, Senesi G, Bertola N, Pecoraro M, Bolis S, Gualerzi A, et al. Plasma-derived extracellular vesicles released after endurance exercise exert cardioprotective activity through the activation of antioxidant pathways. Redox Biol. 2023;63:102737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Ma C, Wang J, Liu H, Chen Y, Ma X, Chen S, et al. Moderate Exercise Enhances Endothelial Progenitor Cell Exosomes Release and Function. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(10):2024–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Winter HE, Murrieta-Coxca JM, Alvarez D, Henao-Restrepo J, Fuentes-Zacarias P, Arcila-Barrera S, et al. Enhanced capture of preeclampsia-derived extracellular vesicles from maternal plasma by monocytes and T lymphocytes. J Reprod Immunol. 2025;167:104417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Xiao X, Xiao F, Zhao M, Tong M, Wise MR, Stone PR, et al. Treating normal early gestation placentae with preeclamptic sera produces extracellular micro and nano vesicles that activate endothelial cells. J Reprod Immunol. 2017;120:34–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Nejad RMA, Saeidi K, Gharbi S, Salari Z, Saleh-Gohari N. Quantification of circulating miR-517c-3p and miR-210–3p levels in preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019;16:75–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Liu RF, Xu X, Huang J, Fei QL, Chen F, Li YD, et al. Down-regulation of miR-517a and miR-517c promotes proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via targeting Pyk2. Cancer Lett. 2013;329(2):164–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Luo R, Shao X, Xu P, Liu Y, Wang Y, Zhao Y, et al. MicroRNA-210 contributes to preeclampsia by downregulating potassium channel modulatory factor 1. Hypertension. 2014;64(4):839–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Skytthe MK, Graversen JH, Moestrup SK. Targeting of CD163(+) Macrophages in Inflammatory and Malignant Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Liu X, Fei H, Yang C, Wang J, Zhu X, Yang A, et al. Trophoblast-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Promote Preeclampsia by Regulating Macrophage Polarization. Hypertension. 2022;79(10):2274–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Jiang S, Zhang W, Cao Q, Rahbar M, Cooke W, Ono M, et al. ExoCounter Assays Identify Women Who May Develop Early-Onset Preeclampsia From 12.5 muL First-Trimester Serum by Characterizing Placental Small Extracellular Vesicles. Hypertension. 2023;80(7):1439–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Gilani SI, Weissgerber TL, Garovic VD, Jayachandran M. Preeclampsia and Extracellular Vesicles. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016;18(9):68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Marques FK, Campos FM, Filho OA, Carvalho AT, Dusse LM, Gomes KB. Circulating microparticles in severe preeclampsia. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;414:253–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.He Y, Wu Q. The Effect of Extracellular Vesicles on Thrombosis. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023;16(3):682–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Tannetta DS, Hunt K, Jones CI, Davidson N, Coxon CH, Ferguson D, et al. Syncytiotrophoblast Extracellular Vesicles from Pre-Eclampsia Placentas Differentially Affect Platelet Function. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Cemgil Arikan D, Aral M, Coskun A, Ozer A. Plasma IL-4, IL-8, IL-12, interferon-gamma and CRP levels in pregnant women with preeclampsia, and their relation with severity of disease and fetal birth weight. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(9):1569–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Hennessy A, Pilmore HL, Simmons LA, Painter DM. A deficiency of placental IL-10 in preeclampsia. J Immunol. 1999;163(6):3491–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Pinheiro MB, Martins-Filho OA, Mota AP, Alpoim PN, Godoi LC, Silveira AC, et al. Severe preeclampsia goes along with a cytokine network disturbance towards a systemic inflammatory state. Cytokine. 2013;62(1):165–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Arriaga-Pizano L, Jimenez-Zamudio L, Vadillo-Ortega F, Martinez-Flores A, Herrerias-Canedo T, Hernandez-Guerrero C. The predominant Th1 cytokine profile in maternal plasma of preeclamptic women is not reflected in the choriodecidual and fetal compartments. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2005;12(5):335–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Saito S, Shiozaki A, Nakashima A, Sakai M, Sasaki Y. The role of the immune system in preeclampsia. Mol Aspects Med. 2007;28(2):192–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Jonsson Y, Matthiesen L, Berg G, Ernerudh J, Nieminen K, Ekerfelt C. Indications of an altered immune balance in preeclampsia: a decrease in in vitro secretion of IL-5 and IL-10 from blood mononuclear cells and in blood basophil counts compared with normal pregnancy. J Reprod Immunol. 2005;66(1):69–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Molvarec A, Czegle I, Szijarto J, Rigo J Jr. Increased circulating interleukin-17 levels in preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol. 2015;112:53–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Dong M, He J, Wang Z, Xie X, Wang H. Placental imbalance of Th1- and Th2-type cytokines in preeclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(8):788–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Ramos A, Youssef L, Molina P, Torramade-Moix S, Martinez-Sanchez J, Moreno-Castano AB, et al. Circulating extracellular vesicles and neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1488127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Mulla MJ, Brosens JJ, Chamley LW, Giles I, Pericleous C, Rahman A, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies induce a pro-inflammatory response in first trimester trophoblast via the TLR4/MyD88 pathway. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2009;62(2):96–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Mulla MJ, Salmon JE, Chamley LW, Brosens JJ, Boeras CM, Kavathas PB, et al. A role for uric acid and the Nalp3 inflammasome in antiphospholipid antibody-induced IL-1beta production by human first trimester trophoblast. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Xie F, Hu Y, Speert DP, Turvey SE, Peng G, Money DM, et al. Toll-like receptor gene polymorphisms and preeclampsia risk: a case-control study and data synthesis. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2010;29(4):390–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Litang Z, Hong W, Weimin Z, Xiaohui T, Qian S. Serum NF-kappaBp65, TLR4 as Biomarker for Diagnosis of Preeclampsia. Open Med (Wars). 2017;12:399–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Romao-Veiga M, Bannwart-Castro CF, Borges VTM, Golim MA, Peracoli JC, Peracoli MTS. Increased TLR4 pathway activation and cytokine imbalance led to lipopolysaccharide tolerance in monocytes from preeclamptic women. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2020;21:159–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Xie F, Hu Y, Turvey SE, Magee LA, Brunham RM, Choi KC, et al. Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 and the cryopyrin inflammasome in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2010;117(1):99–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Cockell AP, Learmont JG, Smarason AK, Redman CW, Sargent IL, Poston L. Human placental syncytiotrophoblast microvillous membranes impair maternal vascular endothelial function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(2):235–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Spaans F, Kao CK, Morton JS, Quon AL, Sawamura T, Tannetta DS, et al. Syncytiotrophoblast extracellular vesicles impair rat uterine vascular function via the lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Saez T, Spaans F, Kirschenman R, Sawamura T, Davidge ST. High-cholesterol diet during pregnancy induces maternal vascular dysfunction in mice: potential role for oxidized LDL-induced LOX-1 and AT1 receptor activation. Clin Sci (Lond). 2020;134(17):2295–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Sankaralingam S, Xu Y, Sawamura T, Davidge ST. Increased lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 expression in the maternal vasculature of women with preeclampsia: role for peroxynitrite. Hypertension. 2009;53(2):270–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Morton JS, Abdalvand A, Jiang Y, Sawamura T, Uwiera RRE, Davidge ST. Lectin-Like Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein 1 Receptor in a Reduced Uteroplacental Perfusion Pressure Rat Model of Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2012;59(5):1014–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Sattar N, Bendomir A, Berry C, Shepherd J, Greer IA, Packard CJ. Lipoprotein subfraction concentrations in preeclampsia: pathogenic parallels to atherosclerosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(3):403–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Maaninka K, Neuvonen M, Kerkela E, Hyvarinen K, Palviainen M, Kamali-Moghaddam M, et al. OxLDL sensitizes platelets for increased formation of extracellular vesicles capable of finetuning macrophage gene expression. Eur J Cell Biol. 2023;102(2):151311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Kao CK, Morton JS, Quon AL, Reyes LM, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Davidge ST. Mechanism of vascular dysfunction due to circulating factors in women with pre-eclampsia. Clin Sci (Lond). 2016;130(7):539–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Motta-Mejia C, Kandzija N, Zhang W, Mhlomi V, Cerdeira AS, Burdujan A, et al. Placental Vesicles Carry Active Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase and Their Activity is Reduced in Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2017;70(2):372–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Tesse A, Meziani F, David E, Carusio N, Kremer H, Schneider F, et al. Microparticles from preeclamptic women induce vascular hyporeactivity in vessels from pregnant mice through an overproduction of NO. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293(1):H520–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Boisrame-Helms J, Meziani F, Sananes N, Boisrame T, Langer B, Schneider F, et al. Detrimental arterial inflammatory effect of microparticles circulating in preeclamptic women: ex vivo evaluation in human arteries. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2015;29(5):450–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Meziani F, Tesse A, David E, Martinez MC, Wangesteen R, Schneider F, et al. Shed membrane particles from preeclamptic women generate vascular wall inflammation and blunt vascular contractility. Am J Pathol. 2006;169(4):1473–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Sandoval H, Ibanez B, Contreras M, Troncoso F, Castro FO, Caamano D, et al. Extracellular Vesicles From Preeclampsia Disrupt the Blood-Brain Barrier by Reducing CLDN5. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2025;45(2):298–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Wojtowicz A, Zembala-Szczerba M, Babczyk D, Kolodziejczyk-Pietruszka M, Lewaczynska O, Huras H. Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia: A Comprehensive Cohort Study of Laboratory and Clinical Findings according to the New ISHHP Criteria. Int J Hypertens. 2019;2019:4108271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Melchiorre K, Sharma R, Thilaganathan B. Cardiovascular implications in preeclampsia: an overview. Circulation. 2014;130(8):703–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Thilaganathan B, Kalafat E. Cardiovascular System in Preeclampsia and Beyond. Hypertension. 2019;73(3):522–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Yang Z, Jia X, Deng Q, Luo M, Hou Y, Yue J, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles loaded with TFCP2 activate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling to alleviate preeclampsia. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;115:109732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Taracha A, Kotarba G, Wilanowski T. Neglected Functions of TFCP2/TFCP2L1/UBP1 Transcription Factors May Offer Valuable Insights into Their Mechanisms of Action. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Xiong ZH, Wei J, Lu MQ, Jin MY, Geng HL. Protective effect of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell exosomes on preserving the morphology and angiogenesis of placenta in rats with preeclampsia. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;105:1240–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Cui J, Chen X, Lin S, Li L, Fan J, Hou H, et al. MiR-101-containing extracellular vesicles bind to BRD4 and enhance proliferation and migration of trophoblasts in preeclampsia. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Yang Z, Shan N, Deng Q, Wang Y, Hou Y, Mei J, et al. Extracellular vesicle-derived microRNA-18b ameliorates preeclampsia by enhancing trophoblast proliferation and migration via Notch2/TIM3/mTORC1 axis. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(10):4583–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Rustad KC, Gurtner GC. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Home to Sites of Injury and Inflammation. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2012;1(4):147–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Warnecke A, Prenzler N, Harre J, Kohl U, Gartner L, Lenarz T, et al. First-in-human intracochlear application of human stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles. 2021;10(8):e12094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Zhu YG, Shi MM, Monsel A, Dai CX, Dong X, Shen H, et al. Nebulized exosomes derived from allogenic adipose tissue mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with severe COVID-19: a pilot study. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13(1):220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Kuriyan AE, Albini TA, Townsend JH, Rodriguez M, Pandya HK, Leonard RE 2nd, et al. Vision Loss after Intravitreal Injection of Autologous “Stem Cells” for AMD. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(11):1047–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Saraf SS, Cunningham MA, Kuriyan AE, Read SP, Rosenfeld PJ, Flynn HW Jr., et al. Bilateral Retinal Detachments After Intravitreal Injection of Adipose-Derived ‘Stem Cells’ in a Patient With Exudative Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48(9):772–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Maksimova NV, Michenko AV, Krasilnikova OA, Klabukov ID, Gadaev IY, Krasheninnikov ME, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy alone does not lead to complete restoration of skin parameters in diabetic foot patients within a 3-year follow-up period. Bioimpacts. 2022;12(1):51–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Staff NP, Madigan NN, Morris J, Jentoft M, Sorenson EJ, Butler G, et al. Safety of intrathecal autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with ALS. Neurology. 2016;87(21):2230–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Moll G, Drzeniek N, Kamhieh-Milz J, Geissler S, Volk HD, Reinke P. MSC Therapies for COVID-19: Importance of Patient Coagulopathy, Thromboprophylaxis, Cell Product Quality and Mode of Delivery for Treatment Safety and Efficacy. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Takakura Y, Hanayama R, Akiyoshi K, Futaki S, Hida K, Ichiki T, et al. Quality and Safety Considerations for Therapeutic Products Based on Extracellular Vesicles. Pharm Res. 2024;41(8):1573–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Cushen SC, Ricci CA, Bradshaw JL, Silzer T, Blessing A, Sun J, et al. Reduced Maternal Circulating Cell-Free Mitochondrial DNA Is Associated With the Development of Preeclampsia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(2):e021726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Gardner JJ, Oliveira da Silva RN, Bradshaw JL, Mabry S, Wilson EN, Hula N, et al. Gestational Chronic Intermittent Hypoxia Triggers Maternal Inflammation and Disrupts Placental Stress Responses. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Welsh JA, Goberdhan DCI, O’Driscoll L, Buzas EI, Blenkiron C, Bussolati B, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): From basic to advanced approaches. J Extracell Vesicles. 2024;13(2):e12404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Tannetta DS, Dragovic RA, Gardiner C, Redman CW, Sargent IL. Characterisation of syncytiotrophoblast vesicles in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: expression of Flt-1 and endoglin. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Gebara N, Scheel J, Skovronova R, Grange C, Marozio L, Gupta S, et al. Single extracellular vesicle analysis in human amniotic fluid shows evidence of phenotype alterations in preeclampsia. J Extracell Vesicles. 2022;11(5):e12217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Strijbos MH, Snijder CA, Kraan J, Lamers CH, Gratama JW, Duvekot JJ. Levels of circulating endothelial cells in normotensive and severe preeclamptic pregnancies. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2010;78(6):382–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Robinson CJ, Johnson DD. Soluble endoglin as a second-trimester marker for preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(2):174 e1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Liu S, Wu X, Chandra S, Lyon C, Ning B, Jiang L, et al. Extracellular vesicles: Emerging tools as therapeutic agent carriers. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12(10):3822–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

