Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1979 Jan;286:283–300. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012619

Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin.

R S Johansson, A B Vallbo
PMCID: PMC1281571  PMID: 439026

Abstract

1. Single unit impulses were recorded with percutaneously inserted tungsten needle electrodes from the median nerve in conscious human subjects. 2. A sample of 334 low threshold mechanoreceptive units innervating the glabrous skin area of the hand were studied. In accordance with earlier investigations, the units were separated into four groups on the basis of their adaptation and receptive field properties: RA, PC, SA I and SA II units. 3. The locations of the receptive fields of individual units were determined and the relative unit densities within various skin regions were calculated. The over-all density was found to increase in the proximo-distal direction. There was a slight increase from the palm to the main part of the finger and an abrupt increase from the main part of the finger to the finger tip. The relative densities in these three regions were 1, 1.6, 4.2. 4. The differences in over-all density were essentially accounted for by the two types of units characterized by small and well defined receptive fields, the RA and SA I units, whereas the PC and SA II units were almost evenly distributed over the whole glabrous skin area. 5. The spatial distribution of densities supports the idea that the RA and SA I units account for spatial acuity in psychophysical tests. This capacity is known to increase in distal direction along the hand. 6. On the basis of histological data regarding the number of myelinated fibres in the median nerve, a model of the absolute unit density was proposed. It was estimated that the density of low threshold mechanoreceptive units at the finger tip is as high as 241 u./cm2, whereas in the palm it is only 58 u./cm2.

Full text

PDF
283

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Behse F., Buchthal F., Carlsen F., Knappeis G. G. Endoneurial space and its constituents in the sural nerve of patients with neuropathy. Brain. 1974 Dec;97(4):773–784. doi: 10.1093/brain/97.1.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown A. G., Hayden R. E. The distribution of cutaneous receptors in the rabbit's hind limb and differential electrical stimulation of their axons. J Physiol. 1971 Mar;213(2):495–506. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown A. G., Iggo A. A quantitative study of cutaneous receptors and afferent fibres in the cat and rabbit. J Physiol. 1967 Dec;193(3):707–733. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burgess P. R., Petit D., Warren R. M. Receptor types in cat hairy skin supplied by myelinated fibers. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Nov;31(6):833–848. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.6.833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CAUNA N., MANNAN G. The structure of human digital pacinian corpuscles (corpus cula lamellosa) and its functional significance. J Anat. 1958 Jan;92(1):1–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CAUNA N. Nerve supply and nerve endings in Meissner's corpuscles. Am J Anat. 1956 Sep;99(2):315–350. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000990206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chambers M. R., Andres K. H., von Duering M., Iggo A. The structure and function of the slowly adapting type II mechanoreceptor in hairy skin. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1972 Oct;57(4):417–445. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1972.sp002177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Darian-Smith I., Johnson K. O., Dykes R. "Cold" fiber population innervating palmar and digital skin of the monkey: responses to cooling pulses. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Mar;36(2):325–346. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Georgopoulos A. P. Functional properties of primary afferent units probably related to pain mechanisms in primate glabrous skin. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Jan;39(1):71–83. doi: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Iggo A., Muir A. R. The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(3):763–796. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Iggo A., Ogawa H. Correlative physiological and morphological studies of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in cat's glabrous skin. J Physiol. 1977 Apr;266(2):275–296. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johansson R. S. Receptive field sensitivity profile of mechanosensitive units innervating the glabrous skin of the human hand. Brain Res. 1976 Mar 12;104(2):330–334. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90627-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jänig W., Schmidt R. F., Zimmermann M. Single unit responses and the total afferent outflow from the cat's foot pad upon mechanical stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 1968;6(2):100–115. doi: 10.1007/BF00239165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Knibestöl M. Stimulus-response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in human glabrous skin area. J Physiol. 1973 Aug;232(3):427–452. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Knibestöl M. Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J Physiol. 1975 Feb;245(1):63–80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Knibestöl M., Vallbo A. B. Single unit analysis of mechanoreceptor activity from the human glabrous skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1970 Oct;80(2):178–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1970.tb04783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumazawa T., Perl E. R. Primate cutaneous sensory units with unmyelinated (C) afferent fibers. J Neurophysiol. 1977 Nov;40(6):1325–1338. doi: 10.1152/jn.1977.40.6.1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee R. G., Ashby P., White D. G., Aguayo A. J. Analysis of motor conduction velocity in the human median nerve by computer simulation of compound muscle action potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1975 Sep;39(3):225–237. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90144-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lindblom U., Lund L. The discharge from vibration-sensitive receptors in the monkey foot. Exp Neurol. 1966 Aug;15(4):401–417. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(66)90138-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lindblom U. Properties of touch receptors in distal glabrous skin of the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Sep;28(5):966–985. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.5.966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lynn B. The nature and location of certain phasic mechanoreceptors in the cat's foot. J Physiol. 1969 May;201(3):765–773. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. MILLER M. R., RALSTON H. J., 3rd, KASAHARA M. The pattern of cutaneous innervation of the human hand. Am J Anat. 1958 Mar;102(2):183–217. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001020203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Matsumoto A., Mori S. Number and diameter distribution of myelinated afferent fibers innervating the paws of the cat and monkey. Exp Neurol. 1975 Aug;48(2):261–274. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(75)90156-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Merzenich M. M., Harrington T. H. The sense of flutter-vibration evoked by stimulation of the hairy skin of primates: comparison of human sensory capacity with the responses of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hairy skin of monkeys. Exp Brain Res. 1969;9(3):236–260. doi: 10.1007/BF00234457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. O'Sullivan D. J., Swallow M. The fibre size and content of the radial and sural nerves. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968 Oct;31(5):464–470. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.31.5.464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Perl E. R. Myelinated afferent fibres innervating the primate skin and their response to noxious stimuli. J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):593–615. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pubols B. H., Pubols L. M. Coding of mechanical stimulus velocity and indentation depth by squirrel monkey and raccoon glabrous skin mechanoreceptors. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Jul;39(4):773–787. doi: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.4.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Swallow M. Fibre size and content of the anterior tibial nerve of the foot. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1966 Jun;29(3):205–213. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.29.3.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Talbot W. H., Darian-Smith I., Kornhuber H. H., Mountcastle V. B. The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Mar;31(2):301–334. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.2.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Torebjörk H. E. Afferent C units responding to mechanical, thermal and chemical stimuli in human non-glabrous skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1974 Nov;92(3):374–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1974.tb05755.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Torebjörk H. E., Hallin R. G. Identification of afferent C units in intact human skin nerves. Brain Res. 1974 Mar 8;67(3):387–403. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90489-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vallbo A. B., Hagbarth K. E. Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects. Exp Neurol. 1968 Jul;21(3):270–289. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(68)90041-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Hees J., Gybels J. M. Pain related to single afferent C fibers from human skin. Brain Res. 1972 Dec 24;48:397–400. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90198-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Whitehorn D., Howe J. F., Lessler M. J., Burgess P. R. Cutaneous receptors supplied by myelinated fibers in the cat. I. Number of receptors innervated by a single nerve. J Neurophysiol. 1974 Nov;37(6):1361–1372. doi: 10.1152/jn.1974.37.6.1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES