Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1995 Jan;68(1):62–68. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80159-1

Acetylcholinesterase: diffusional encounter rate constants for dumbbell models of ligand.

J Antosiewicz 1, M K Gilson 1, I H Lee 1, J A McCammon 1
PMCID: PMC1281661  PMID: 7711269

Abstract

For some enzymes, virtually every substrate molecule that encounters the entrance to the active site proceeds to reaction, at low substrate concentrations. Such diffusion-limited enzymes display high apparent bimolecular rate constants ((kcat/KM)), which depend strongly upon solvent viscosity. Some experimental studies provide evidence that acetylcholinesterase falls into this category. Interestingly, the asymmetric charge distribution of acetylcholinesterase, apparent from the crystallographic structure, suggests that its electrostatic field accelerates the encounter of its cationic substrate, acetylcholine, with the entrance to the active site. Here we report simulations of the diffusion of substrate in the electrostatic field of acetylcholinesterase. We find that the field indeed guides the substrate to the mouth of the active site. The computed encounter rate constants depend upon the particular relative geometries of substrate and enzyme that are considered to represent successful encounters. With loose reaction criteria, the computed rates exceed those measured experimentally, but the rate constants vary appropriately with ionic strength. Although more restrictive reaction criteria lower the computed rates, they also lead to unrealistic variation of the rate constants with ionic strength. That these simulations do not agree well with experiment suggests that the simple diffusion model is incomplete. Structural fluctuations in the enzyme or events after the encounter may well contribute to rate limitation.

Full text

PDF
62

Images in this article

64FIGURE 1
on p.64

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Antosiewicz J., McCammon J. A., Gilson M. K. Prediction of pH-dependent properties of proteins. J Mol Biol. 1994 May 6;238(3):415–436. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antosiewicz J., Porschke D. Turn of promotor DNA by cAMP receptor protein characterized by bead model simulation of rotational diffusion. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1988 Feb;5(4):819–837. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1988.10506429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bazelyansky M., Robey E., Kirsch J. F. Fractional diffusion-limited component of reactions catalyzed by acetylcholinesterase. Biochemistry. 1986 Jan 14;25(1):125–130. doi: 10.1021/bi00349a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Garcia de la Torre J. G., Bloomfield V. A. Hydrodynamic properties of complex, rigid, biological macromolecules: theory and applications. Q Rev Biophys. 1981 Feb;14(1):81–139. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500002080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilson M. K., Honig B. H. The dielectric constant of a folded protein. Biopolymers. 1986 Nov;25(11):2097–2119. doi: 10.1002/bip.360251106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilson M. K. Multiple-site titration and molecular modeling: two rapid methods for computing energies and forces for ionizable groups in proteins. Proteins. 1993 Mar;15(3):266–282. doi: 10.1002/prot.340150305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilson M. K., Straatsma T. P., McCammon J. A., Ripoll D. R., Faerman C. H., Axelsen P. H., Silman I., Sussman J. L. Open "back door" in a molecular dynamics simulation of acetylcholinesterase. Science. 1994 Mar 4;263(5151):1276–1278. doi: 10.1126/science.8122110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harel M., Schalk I., Ehret-Sabatier L., Bouet F., Goeldner M., Hirth C., Axelsen P. H., Silman I., Sussman J. L. Quaternary ligand binding to aromatic residues in the active-site gorge of acetylcholinesterase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):9031–9035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.9031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Klapper I., Hagstrom R., Fine R., Sharp K., Honig B. Focusing of electric fields in the active site of Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase: effects of ionic strength and amino-acid modification. Proteins. 1986 Sep;1(1):47–59. doi: 10.1002/prot.340010109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Radić Z., Gibney G., Kawamoto S., MacPhee-Quigley K., Bongiorno C., Taylor P. Expression of recombinant acetylcholinesterase in a baculovirus system: kinetic properties of glutamate 199 mutants. Biochemistry. 1992 Oct 13;31(40):9760–9767. doi: 10.1021/bi00155a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Richards F. M. Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1977;6:151–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.001055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sines J. J., Allison S. A., McCammon J. A. Point charge distributions and electrostatic steering in enzyme/substrate encounter: Brownian dynamics of modified copper/zinc superoxide dismutases. Biochemistry. 1990 Oct 9;29(40):9403–9412. doi: 10.1021/bi00492a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wade R. C., Luty B. A., Demchuk E., Madura J. D., Davis M. E., Briggs J. M., McCammon J. A. Simulation of enzyme-substrate encounter with gated active sites. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 Jan;1(1):65–69. doi: 10.1038/nsb0194-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES