Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1995 Jan;68(1):89–95. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80162-1

Inactivation in ShakerB K+ channels: a test for the number of inactivating particles on each channel.

F Gomez-Lagunas 1, C M Armstrong 1
PMCID: PMC1281664  PMID: 7711272

Abstract

Fast inactivation in ShakerB K channels results from pore-block caused by "ball peptides" attached to the inner part of each K channel. We have examined the question of how many functional inactivating balls are on each channel and how this number affects inactivation and recovery from inactivation. To that purpose we expressed ShakerB in the insect cell line Sf9 and gradually removed inactivation by perfusing the cell interior with the hydrolytic enzyme papain under whole cell patch clamp. Inactivation slows down as the balls are removed by an amount consistent with the presence of four balls on each channel. Recovery from inactivation has the same time course early and late in papain action; it does not depend on the number of balls remaining on the channel, consistent with the idea that reinactivation is not significant during recovery from inactivation. Our conclusion is that ShakerB has four ball peptides, each capable of causing inactivation. Statistically, the balls are identical and independent. The stability of N-type inactivation by the remaining balls is not appreciably affected by removing some of the balls from a channel.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

91FIGURE 3
on p.91

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong C. M., Bezanilla F. Inactivation of the sodium channel. II. Gating current experiments. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Nov;70(5):567–590. doi: 10.1085/jgp.70.5.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong C. M., Bezanilla F., Rojas E. Destruction of sodium conductance inactivation in squid axons perfused with pronase. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Oct;62(4):375–391. doi: 10.1085/jgp.62.4.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armstrong C. M. Sodium channels and gating currents. Physiol Rev. 1981 Jul;61(3):644–683. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1981.61.3.644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Catterall W. A. Structure and function of voltage-sensitive ion channels. Science. 1988 Oct 7;242(4875):50–61. doi: 10.1126/science.2459775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Choi K. L., Aldrich R. W., Yellen G. Tetraethylammonium blockade distinguishes two inactivation mechanisms in voltage-activated K+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 15;88(12):5092–5095. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cota G., Armstrong C. M. Sodium channel gating in clonal pituitary cells. The inactivation step is not voltage dependent. J Gen Physiol. 1989 Aug;94(2):213–232. doi: 10.1085/jgp.94.2.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Demo S. D., Yellen G. The inactivation gate of the Shaker K+ channel behaves like an open-channel blocker. Neuron. 1991 Nov;7(5):743–753. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90277-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gonoi T., Hille B. Gating of Na channels. Inactivation modifiers discriminate among models. J Gen Physiol. 1987 Feb;89(2):253–274. doi: 10.1085/jgp.89.2.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grissmer S., Cahalan M. TEA prevents inactivation while blocking open K+ channels in human T lymphocytes. Biophys J. 1989 Jan;55(1):203–206. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82793-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guy H. R., Conti F. Pursuing the structure and function of voltage-gated channels. Trends Neurosci. 1990 Jun;13(6):201–206. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90160-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoshi T., Zagotta W. N., Aldrich R. W. Biophysical and molecular mechanisms of Shaker potassium channel inactivation. Science. 1990 Oct 26;250(4980):533–538. doi: 10.1126/science.2122519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoshi T., Zagotta W. N., Aldrich R. W. Two types of inactivation in Shaker K+ channels: effects of alterations in the carboxy-terminal region. Neuron. 1991 Oct;7(4):547–556. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90367-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Iverson L. E., Rudy B. The role of the divergent amino and carboxyl domains on the inactivation properties of potassium channels derived from the Shaker gene of Drosophila. J Neurosci. 1990 Sep;10(9):2903–2916. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-09-02903.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. How might the diversity of potassium channels be generated? Trends Neurosci. 1990 Oct;13(10):415–419. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90123-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Klaiber K., Williams N., Roberts T. M., Papazian D. M., Jan L. Y., Miller C. Functional expression of Shaker K+ channels in a baculovirus-infected insect cell line. Neuron. 1990 Aug;5(2):221–226. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90311-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MacKinnon R., Aldrich R. W., Lee A. W. Functional stoichiometry of Shaker potassium channel inactivation. Science. 1993 Oct 29;262(5134):757–759. doi: 10.1126/science.7694359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MacKinnon R. Determination of the subunit stoichiometry of a voltage-activated potassium channel. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):232–235. doi: 10.1038/350232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Matteson D. R., Carmeliet P. Modification of K channel inactivation by papain and N-bromoacetamide. Biophys J. 1988 Apr;53(4):641–645. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83143-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Noda M., Ikeda T., Kayano T., Suzuki H., Takeshima H., Kurasaki M., Takahashi H., Numa S. Existence of distinct sodium channel messenger RNAs in rat brain. Nature. 1986 Mar 13;320(6058):188–192. doi: 10.1038/320188a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oxford G. S., Wagoner P. K. The inactivating K+ current in GH3 pituitary cells and its modification by chemical reagents. J Physiol. 1989 Mar;410:587–612. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pusch M., Neher E. Rates of diffusional exchange between small cells and a measuring patch pipette. Pflugers Arch. 1988 Feb;411(2):204–211. doi: 10.1007/BF00582316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ruppersberg J. P., Frank R., Pongs O., Stocker M. Cloned neuronal IK(A) channels reopen during recovery from inactivation. Nature. 1991 Oct 17;353(6345):657–660. doi: 10.1038/353657a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stühmer W., Conti F., Suzuki H., Wang X. D., Noda M., Yahagi N., Kubo H., Numa S. Structural parts involved in activation and inactivation of the sodium channel. Nature. 1989 Jun 22;339(6226):597–603. doi: 10.1038/339597a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zagotta W. N., Aldrich R. W. Voltage-dependent gating of Shaker A-type potassium channels in Drosophila muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1990 Jan;95(1):29–60. doi: 10.1085/jgp.95.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zagotta W. N., Hoshi T., Aldrich R. W. Restoration of inactivation in mutants of Shaker potassium channels by a peptide derived from ShB. Science. 1990 Oct 26;250(4980):568–571. doi: 10.1126/science.2122520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES