Skip to main content
Brain Communications logoLink to Brain Communications
. 2026 Jan 2;8(1):fcaf508. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf508

Contribution of local amyloid-β and tau burden to hypometabolism in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease

Catarina Tristão-Pereira 1,2,#, Stephanie Langella 3,#, Ana Baena 4, Natalia Londono 5, Justin S Sanchez 6, Lusiana Martinez 7,8, Sergio Alvarez 9, Monica Vidal 10, David Aguillon 11, Yi Su 12, Hillary Protas 13, Michael J Properzi 14, Vincent Malotaux 15,16, Bing He 17,18, Averi Giudicessi 19,20, Eric M Reiman 21, Bernard J Hanseeuw 22,23, Yakeel T Quiroz 24,25,26,
PMCID: PMC12816921  PMID: 41567829

Abstract

Glucose hypometabolism is observed in early Alzheimer’s disease. However, there are regional discrepancies in hypometabolism and Alzheimer’s pathological markers. We examined the local and global contributions of amyloid-β and tau pathology to glucose metabolism and their interplay in memory decline in Presenilin-1 E280A mutation carriers and non-carriers from the largest autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease kindred. This cross-sectional study included 43 mutation carriers (6 cognitively impaired) and 39 non-carriers from the Colombia-Boston Biomarker Study. Glucose metabolism was assessed with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and memory performance with the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease word list learning. A subgroup of 22 carriers and 26 non-carriers additionally had measures of amyloid-β and tau using 11C-Pittsburgh compound B and 18F-flortaucipir PET, respectively. First, we compared regional glucose metabolism between groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Then, we studied regional glucose metabolism associations with age, co-localized amyloid-β and tau pathology, and memory using Spearman correlation. Local specificity was assessed by partial correlations controlling for global amyloid-β and tau burden. Finally, we studied whether the link between Alzheimer’s pathology and memory was mediated by regional glucose hypometabolism. Mutation carriers exhibited lower glucose metabolism in the precuneus and isthmus cingulate compared to non-carriers. Hypometabolism correlated locally with greater tau accumulation in the medial temporal lobe, inferior temporal gyrus and prefrontal cortex, and with greater amyloid-β accumulation in the inferior temporal gyrus in carriers. These associations were no longer significant when controlled for global pathology, except for the frontal tau-hypometabolism correlation, which was independent of global tau burden, suggesting local specificity. Additionally, lower memory performance in carriers was associated with hypometabolism in regions typically affected by tau. The mediation analysis revealed a region-specific interplay in pathology, with the associations of amyloid-β and tau pathology with memory decline being mediated by hypometabolism in the inferior temporal. Our findings highlight the metabolic vulnerability of the precuneus in early stages, supporting a common pathophysiology between autosomal-dominant and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. The lack of local correlations between amyloid-β, tau and hypometabolism suggests that distant effects may explain the regional discrepancies between pathology accumulation and metabolic alterations. This study describes a model where pathology advances and interacts in a region-specific manner to impact clinical outcomes, underscoring the importance of regional [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET as an independent predictor of cognitive decline. Overall, our findings improve understanding of the spatial progression of pathology, which could have important implications in disease management.

Keywords: FDG–PET, cerebral hypometabolism, autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease, imaging biomarkers, cognition


Tristão-Pereira et al. investigate the local and global contributions of amyloid-β and tau to glucose metabolism in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease using PET. Their findings suggest that distant rather than local effects may explain regional discrepancies between pathology accumulation and metabolic decline, underscoring that region-specific pathology interactions contribute to memory function.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Cerebral glucose hypometabolism, measured with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET, is a primary feature of Alzheimer’s disease (AD).1 Hypometabolism occurs slowly with normal aging2-4 and accelerates along AD progression, typically affecting temporal and parietal brain regions in mild cognitive impairment (MCI),5,6 extending to the frontal lobe in sporadic AD.7-9 In autosomal-dominant AD (ADAD), a genetically determined form of early-onset AD, hypometabolism begins in the precuneus approximately a decade prior to the estimated onset of clinical symptoms.10-12

Within the Amyloid, Tau and Neurodegeneration research framework, hypometabolism follows the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles and precedes neuronal loss.1 The presence of Aβ is believed to promote tau spread from the medial temporal lobe to neocortical regions.13 Widespread tau then becomes closely linked to neurodegeneration, resulting in cognitive decline.14 However, the spatio-temporal interplay between Aβ, tau and hypometabolism in the disease progression is unclear. Some studies have not found any associations between glucose metabolism and Aβ pathology in sporadic AD15-17 or ADAD,18 while others have shown that hypometabolism and Aβ accumulation are locally correlated in temporal and parietal brain regions.19-21 The local specificity of these correlations has been questioned as the pattern of hypometabolism might depend on cortex-wide Aβ accumulation rather than regional deposits of fibrillar Aβ plaques.22 In turn, regional correlations between hypometabolism and tau in the entorhinal and inferior temporal cortices have been more consistently reported in sporadic AD23-25 and ADAD,18,26 though their local specificity has not been investigated. Given that the FDG-PET signal reflects, in part, neuronal loss, hypometabolism might be more influenced by intraneuronal tau tangles than extracellular Aβ.27

Thus, several studies have sought to determine whether glucose metabolism offers insights into cognitive function above the influence of AD pathology. Hypometabolism predicts cognitive decline from normal aging6,23,28 and is associated with memory deterioration in AD.29-31 Consistent with a model where tau and hypometabolism drive neurodegeneration before clinical symptoms, Aβ accumulation alone does not explain cognitive impairment in AD.15,32,33 Yet, conflicting findings pertaining to the role of tau in these associations cast doubt on whether cognitive correlates of hypometabolism are independent of34 or mediated by tau pathology.35

Together, existing literature improves understanding of the role glucose hypometabolism plays in the AD pathological cascade. However, there is inconsistent evidence for the contribution of regional Aβ and tau pathology to AD-related hypometabolism and their interplay in downstream cognitive deterioration. To investigate this, we propose to study FDG-PET data in Presenilin-1 (PSEN1) E280A mutation carriers from the largest ADAD Colombian kindred. In this kindred, carriers develop MCI at a median age of 44 years and AD dementia at 49 years.36 Despite showing a more rapid progression,37 ADAD can serve as a roadmap for the late-onset form of the disease, given its well-characterized trajectory. Here, our first aim is to determine the regional pattern of glucose metabolism across the AD continuum in PSEN1 mutation carriers and its age-related changes. Second, we aim to study cortical and subcortical glucose metabolism in relation to co-localized Aβ and tau burden, while accounting for global pathology burden. Third, we aim to examine the memory correlates of regional glucose metabolism and determine whether these are influenced by AD pathology. We hypothesize that tau, rather than Aβ, will primarily underlie FDG-PET reductions in brain regions of early pathology accumulation and that region-specific hypometabolism will correlate with cognitive impairment in ADAD.

Materials and methods

Study participants

In this study, we used data from PSEN1 E280A carriers and age-matched non-carrier family members from the Colombia-Boston (COLBOS) Biomarker Study, conducted at the Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, USA) in collaboration with the Neuroscience Group of Antioquia at the University of Antioquia and the Pablo Tobón Uribe Hospital (Medellin, Colombia).36 All participants with available FDG-PET scans and neuropsychological assessments were included in the study. Participants were excluded if they had a significant medical, psychiatric or neurological disorder or a history of stroke, seizures or substance abuse. A subset of participants also had [11C] Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) and [18F]flortaucipir (FTP) PET scans available for Aβ and tau quantification. All participants provided written informed consent before study assessments and were compensated. This study was approved by the local institutional review boards of the Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Antioquia. Researchers and participants were blind to genetic status.

Neuropsychological assessment

Neuropsychological evaluations were conducted in Spanish at the University of Antioquia within six months of neuroimaging data collection. The Functional Assessment Staging Tool (FAST; range: 1–7) was used to determine cognitive status, with a score ≤ 2 indicating no objective cognitive impairment.38 The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; range: 0–30) was used to assess global cognitive function39 and the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) word list learning (range: 0–30) was used to assess memory performance,40 one of the earliest indicators of preclinical changes in PSEN1 E280A carriers.41 Other tests included the CERAD’s Semantic Fluency test42 and the Trail Making Test Part A (TMTA) to assess processing speed.43 The neuropsychological battery is detailed in Supplementary material and has been previously reported.36,41

Image acquisition and processing

Structural T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired on a Siemens 3 Tesla Tim Trio scanner (repetition time = 2300 ms, echo time = 2.95 ms, flip angle = 9 degrees, voxel size = 1.05 × 1.05 × 1.2 mm). Images were processed using Freesurfer v7.2.0 to identify white and pial surfaces and to segment cortical and subcortical regions of interest (ROIs) from the Desikan atlas.44,45 Visual inspection of the outputs was conducted, and manual edits were made when necessary to ensure accurate segmentation.

FDG-PET scans were acquired on a 64-section Siemens Biograph mCT PET/CT. Intravenous injection of 5 mCi of FDG was administered 30 min before a dynamic emission scan of 6 × 5-minute frames in fasting conditions (≥5 h). FDG-PET images were reconstructed with a computed tomographic attenuation correction and were processed using PET Unified Pipelines, which included scanner harmonization to 8 mm, motion correction and frame summation.46 Aβ and tau data were acquired on a Siemens Emission Computed Axial Tomography High Resolution + PET scanner (3D mode; 63 image planes; 15.2 cm axial field of view; 5.6 mm transaxial resolution; 2.4 mm slice interval). Aβ data were acquired with a 60-minute dynamic protocol immediately after a 8.5–15 mCi bolus injection of PiB (12 × 15-second + 57 × 60-second frames) and analysed by the Logan reference method.47 Tau data were acquired 80–100 min after a 9.0–11.0 mCi bolus injection of FTP (4 × 5-minute frames). PET and MRI images were co-registered with affine transformations, and PET data were sampled using Freesurfer-derived Desikan ROIs. Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) for FDG and FTP data and distribution volume ratio (DVR) for PiB data were estimated. We used the cerebellar grey matter as the reference region due to its low intraindividual variability in glucose metabolism and to ensure comparability across PET modalities.48 Each PET regional SUVR and DVR underwent partial volume correction using the regional spread function method.49 This method reduces atrophy-related bias by modelling a spill-over matrix at the regional level based on individual anatomical segmentations and the scanner’s point spread function.50 Left and right hemispheres were averaged for each FDG, FTP and PiB ROIs. Composite regions were used to account for global Aβ and tau pathology in early accumulation regions, with frontal, lateral temporal, parietal and retrosplenial PiB uptake averaged to represent global Aβ burden51 and precuneus, entorhinal and inferior temporal FTP uptake averaged to represent global tau burden, respectively.52

Statistical analysis

Demographic characteristics were compared between PSEN1 mutation carriers and non-carriers using two-tailed t-tests for continuous variables and χ2-tests for categorical variables. First, we compared FDG SUVR across all cortical and subcortical ROIs between carriers and non-carriers using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Paired Wilcoxon rank-sum tests compared FDG SUVR in the left and right hemispheres. Effect sizes of those differences were assessed using the rank-biserial correlation r. In the ROIs with the largest between-group differences, we assessed the correlation between FDG SUVR and age using Spearman correlation. The same approach was used to compare FTP SUVR and PiB DVR between groups. Second, we conducted Spearman correlations between the same-region FDG SUVR and FTP SUVR, as well as FDG SUVR and PiB DVR across all cortical and subcortical ROIs in PSEN1 mutation carriers and non-carriers. To understand whether the observed significant effects were due to global pathology rather than local specificity, we performed partial correlations controlling for global FTP SUVR in local FDG–FTP correlations and for global PiB DVR in local FDG–PiB correlations. In addition, to explore the interplay between co-localized pathology burden, local FDG–FTP correlations were controlled for local PiB DVR and local FDG–PiB correlations for local FTP SUVR. Lastly, we assessed the link between regional FDG SUVR and memory (CERAD’s word list learning) in PSEN1 mutation carriers and non-carriers using Spearman correlation. Secondary models assessed correlations with semantic fluency (CERAD’s semantic fluency) and processing speed (TMTA time) as well. All associations in PSEN1 mutation carriers were further adjusted for MMSE (global cognition) using partial Spearman correlation. Mediation analyses were then performed in the imaging sub-sample to study whether the effects of Aβ and tau burden on memory were mediated by glucose metabolism. In mediation models, the independent variable was either PiB DVR or FTP SUVR, the dependent variable was memory (CERAD’s word list learning), and the mediator was FDG SUVR. These models were carried out in the four ROIs with the largest differences between groups and/or the strongest correlations (precuneus, caudal middle frontal, inferior temporal and hippocampus) and were adjusted for PSEN1 mutation status. We used R’s mediation package with 1000 bootstrapping simulations.

We used Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons in all regional analyses and bootstrapping methods to calculate confidence intervals. Statistical significance was set at α=0.05. All analyses were performed in R (v4.4.1).

Results

Sample characteristics

A total of 43 PSEN1 E280A mutation carriers and 39 non-carriers were included in this study (Table 1). Mean age was 38.2 ± 7.5 years in carriers and 39.6 ± 6.7 years in non-carriers. Age, sex or education years did not differ between groups. Among mutation carriers, six were cognitively impaired (FAST > 2), while all non-carriers were cognitively intact (P < 0.001). MMSE scores (P < 0.001), CERAD’s word list learning (P = 0.005) and TMTA times (P = 0.023) were significantly lower in carriers compared to non-carriers. Of those, a subgroup of 22 PSEN1 mutation carriers and 26 non-carriers had PiB-PET and FTP-PET data available in addition to FDG-PET data and neuropsychological assessments. The demographics of this subgroup are comparable to the main sample (Supplementary Table 1).

Table 1.

Sample demographics

PSEN1 E280A carriers (n = 43) Non-carriers (n = 39) P-value
Age (years) 38.2 ± 7.5 39.6 ± 6.7 0.399
Education (years) 10.2 ± 3.9 11.5 ± 4.1 0.140
Sex (n, %) 0.744
 Female 29 (67%) 24 (62%)
 Male 14 (33%) 15 (38%)
FAST <0.001
 ≤2 37 (86%) 39 (100%)
 >2 6 (14%) 0
MMSE 27.3 ± 2.4 28.8 ± 1.0 <0.001
CERAD’s word list learning 18.0 ± 5.1 20.8 ± 3.8 0.005
CERAD’s semantic fluency 21.4 ± 5.1 21.2 ± 3.8 0.845
TMTA time 53.9 ± 37.3 39.7 ± 13.5 0.023

Demographics were compared between PSEN1 mutation carriers (n = 43) and non-carriers (n = 39) using two-tailed t-tests for continuous variables and χ2-tests for categorical variables. Bold font represents statistical significance (P < 0.05).

Continuous variables are represented as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables as n (%).

CERAD, Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease; FAST, Functional Assessment Staging Tool; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; TMTA,Trail Making Test Part A.

Regional patterns of glucose hypometabolism in PSEN1 E280A carriers

First, we assessed between-group differences in mean FDG uptake across bilateral cortical and subcortical regions. We observed a pattern of hypometabolism in parietal, temporal and frontal regions, with significantly lower glucose metabolism in PSEN1 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers in the precuneus [W = 473, r = −0.436, 95% confidence interval (CI: −0.643, −0.186), P < 0.001, padj = 0.027] and isthmus cingulate [W = 475, r = −0.434, 95% CI (−0.643, −0.219), P < 0.001, padj = 0.027], after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (Fig. 1A). We observed hemispheric differences in FDG SUVR, which were consistent in both carriers and non-carriers (Supplementary Fig. 1). In these brain regions, glucose metabolism was negatively correlated with age in carriers [precuneus: ρ = −0.540, 95% CI (−0.717, −0.282), P < 0.001; isthmus cingulate: ρ = −0.649, 95% CI (−0.788, −0.437), P < 0.001] but not in non-carriers [precuneus: ρ = 0.086, 95% CI (−0.257, 0.377), P = 0.604; isthmus cingulate: ρ = 0.117, 95% CI (−0.181, 0.399), P = 0.476] (Fig. 1BC). The intersection point was at ages 28.4 years in the precuneus and 31.6 years in the isthmus cingulate, which corresponds to 15.6 years and 12.4 years before the estimated age of clinical onset in carriers (44 years).11 The correlation between FDG uptake and age in carriers remained significant after adjusting for global cognition (Supplementary Table 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Regional glucose metabolism differences between PSEN1 mutation carriers and non-carriers. Ordered effect sizes of the differences in regional FDG SUVR between groups calculated as the rank-biserial correlation r of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (dots, n = 82) (A). Whiskers represent upper and lower bounds of bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals. Negative effect sizes indicate lower FDG SUVR in PSEN1 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers. Brain projections highlight the regions with statistically significant differences between groups (P < 0.05), with light colours representing larger effect sizes. Regions highlighted within the forest plot represent models that survived Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Scatter plots showing the associations between age and FDG SUVR in the precuneus (B) and isthmus cingulate (C) for PSEN1 mutation carriers (n = 43) and non-carriers (n = 39), using Spearman correlation ρ. Data points represent subjects; colour lines represent estimated regression slopes; and shadows represent 95% confidence intervals. *: padj < 0.05. FDG, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio; Banks Sup Temp Sulcus, banks of the superior temporal sulcus; Ventral DC, ventral diencephalon.

Additionally, regional differences in FTP SUVR revealed higher tau accumulation in PSEN1 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers, mainly in medial temporal lobe structures, including the parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, hippocampus and entorhinal cortex (Supplementary Fig. 2A). In contrast, regional PiB DVR showed widespread higher Aβ burden in carriers than non-carriers, with the greatest differences in basal ganglia and neocortical structures (Supplementary Fig. 2B).

Local and global associations between hypometabolism and Aβ and tau pathology in PSEN1 E280A carriers

Further, we assessed the local associations of FDG SUVR with FTP SUVR and PiB DVR across cortical and subcortical regions in PSEN1 mutation carriers and non-carriers. Glucose metabolism and tau accumulation were inversely associated in frontal, temporal and parietal regions in carriers (Fig. 2ABC). Specifically, glucose hypometabolism was locally correlated with greater tau burden after Bonferroni correction in the caudal middle frontal [ρ = −0.773, 95% CI (−0.909, −0.491), P < 0.001, padj < 0.001], inferior temporal [ρ = −0.762, 95% CI (−0.905, −0.487), P < 0.001, padj = 0.005], entorhinal [ρ = −0.730, 95% CI (−0.856, −0.476), P < 0.001, padj = 0.009], inferior parietal [ρ = −0.696, 95% CI (−0.897, −0.326), P < 0.001, padj = 0.023], rostral middle frontal [ρ = −0.693, 95% CI (−0.859, −0.383), P < 0.001, padj = 0.023] and isthmus cingulate [ρ = −0.666, 95% CI (−0.832, −0.361), P = 0.001, padj = 0.045]. To test for local specificity, we controlled local correlations between FDG SUVR and FTP SUVR in PSEN1 mutation carriers for global tau pathology. Partial correlations remained significant in the caudal [ρ = −0.706, 95% CI (−0.869, −0.405), P < 0.001] and rostral [ρ = −0.473, 95% CI (−0.746, −0.064), P = 0.030] middle frontal, but not in the other brain regions (Table 2). Additionally, all these regional partial correlations remained unchanged when controlling for co-localized Aβ accumulation (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Regional association between glucose metabolism and Aβ and tau pathology in PSEN1 mutation carriers. Ordered correlation coefficients ρ of the regional associations of FDG SUVR with FTP SUVR (A) and PiB DVR (D) in PSEN1 mutation carriers (dots, n = 22) calculated from Spearman correlation. Whiskers represent upper and lower bounds of bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals. Brain projections highlight the regions with statistically significant correlations, with light colours representing larger effect sizes for negative correlations. Regions highlighted within the forest plot represent models that survived Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Scatter plots showing the associations of FDG SUVR with FTP SUVR in the caudal middle frontal (B) and inferior temporal (C) and with PiB DVR in the inferior temporal (E) and inferior parietal (F) in PSEN1 mutation carriers (n = 22) and non-carriers (n = 26), using Spearman correlation ρ. Data points represent subjects; colour lines represent estimated regression slopes; and shadows represent 95% confidence intervals. *: padj < 0.05, **: padj < 0.01, ***: padj < 0.001. DVR, distribution value ratio; FDG, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose; FTP, [18F]flortaucipir; PiB, [11C]Pittsburgh compound B; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio; Banks Sup Temp Sulcus, banks of the superior temporal sulcus; ventral DC, Ventral diencephalon; CMF, caudal middle frontal.

Table 2.

Local and global effects of Aβ and tau accumulation on glucose metabolism in PSEN1 mutation carriers

Partial correlations between local FDG SUVR and FTP SUVR in PSEN1 carriers
Region Simple correlation Controlling for global FTP SUVR Controlling for local PiB DVR
 Caudal Middle Frontal −0.773
[−0.908, −0.444]
(P  <  0.001)
−0.706
[−0.869, −0.405]
(P  <  0.001)
−0.698
[−0.865, −0.392]
(P  <  0.001)
 Inferior Temporal −0.762
[−0.894, −0.512]
(P  <  0.001)
−0.343
[−0.668, 0.092]
(P = 0.128)
−0.482
[−0.751, −0.076]
(P  =  0.027)
 Entorhinal −0.730
[−0.854, −0.482]
(P  <  0.001)
−0.425
[−0.718, 0.000]
(P = 0.055)
−0.747
[−0.889, −0.474]
(P  <  0.001)
 Inferior Parietal −0.696
[−0.894, −0.326]
(P  <  0.001)
−0.353
[−0.674, 0.080]
(P = 0.116)
−0.495
[−0.758, −0.092]
(P  =  0.023)
 Rostral Middle Frontal −0.693
[−0.852, −0.361]
(P  <  0.001)
−0.473
[−0.746, −0.064]
(P  =  0.030)
−0.584
[−0.807, −0.215]
(P  =  0.005)
 Isthmus Cingulate −0.666
[−0.839, −0.337]
(P  =  0.001)
−0.157
[−0.283, 0.543]
(P = 0.496)
−0.635
[−0.834, −0.292]
(P  =  0.002)
Partial correlations between local FDG SUVR and PiB DVR in PSEN1 carriers
 Region Simple correlation Controlling for global PiB DVR Controlling for local FTP SUVR
 Inferior Temporal −0.756
[−0.869, −0.498]
(P  <  0.001)
−0.228
[−0.481, 0.060]
(P = 0.124)
−0.465
[−0.741, −0.054]
(P  =  0.034)

Local simple and partial correlations of FDG SUVR with FTP SUVR and PiB DVR in PSEN1 mutation carriers (n = 22) in brain regions where simple correlations survived Bonferroni correction. Partial correlations were either controlled for global FTP SUVR or same-region PiB DVR and for global PiB DVR or same-region FTP SUVR. Spearman correlation coefficients ρ, bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P-values are shown for each correlation. Bold font represents statistical significance (P < 0.05). DVR, distribution value ratio; FDG, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose; FTP, [18F]flortaucipir; PiB, [11C]Pittsburgh compound B; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio.

The relationship between glucose metabolism and Aβ accumulation was not as extensive across the brain, with PSEN1 mutation carriers showing a Bonferroni-corrected correlation between lower glucose metabolism and higher Aβ burden only in the inferior temporal [ρ = −0.756, 95% CI (−0.873, −0.500), P < 0.001, padj = 0.005] (Fig. 2DEF). When controlling for global Aβ pathology, the partial correlation between FDG SUVR and PiB DVR in the inferior temporal was no longer significant [ρ = −0.228, 95% CI (−0.481, 0.060), P = 0.124; Table 2]. In contrast, this partial correlation remained unchanged when controlling for co-localized tau accumulation (Table 2). Same-region correlations between FDG SUVR and FTP SUVR as well as FDG SUVR and PiB DVR in carriers were independent of global cognition, with MMSE-adjusted correlations remaining significant (Supplementary Table 2).

In non-carriers, FDG SUVR did not correlate with either FTP SUVR or PiB DVR after Bonferroni correction (Supplementary Fig. 3). Local and partial correlations were similar in the whole imaging sub-sample as in PSEN1 mutation carriers (Supplementary Table 3).

Associations of regional hypometabolism with memory and their interplay with Aβ and tau pathology

We then assessed the association between memory and glucose metabolism across cortical and subcortical brain regions. FDG uptake in temporal and parietal regions was correlated with the CERAD’s word list learning in PSEN1 mutation carriers (Fig. 3A). We observed significant Bonferroni-corrected correlations between worse memory performance and hypometabolism in the hippocampus[ρ = 0.569, 95% CI (0.329, 0.745), P < 0.001, padj = 0.005], inferior temporal [ρ = 0.511, 95% CI (0.202, 0.740), P < 0.001, padj = 0.023] and entorhinal [ρ = 0.509, 95% CI (0.229, 0.708), P < 0.001, padj = 0.023; Fig. 3BC]. Partial correlations between memory and FDG uptake remained statistically significant when adjusted for MMSE (Supplementary Table 2). In non-carriers, memory performance was not associated with glucose metabolism across the brain (Supplementary Fig. 4). Among other cognitive functions, reduced FDG uptake was associated with increased processing speed in carriers, in a pattern similar to that of memory, but not to semantic fluency (Supplementary Fig. 5).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Association between regional glucose metabolism and memory performance in PSEN1 mutation carriers. Ordered correlation coefficients ρ of the associations of regional FDG SUVR with CERAD word list learning (memory performance, (A) in PSEN1 mutation carriers (dots, n = 43) calculated from Spearman correlation. Whiskers represent upper and lower bounds of bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals. Brain projections highlight the regions with statistically significant correlations, with light colours representing larger effect sizes for positive correlations. Regions highlighted within the forest plot represent models that survived Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Scatter plots showing the associations of CERAD word list learning in the hippocampus (B) and inferior temporal (C) for PSEN1 mutation carriers (n = 43) and non-carriers (n = 39), using Spearman correlation ρ. Data points represent subjects; colour lines represent estimated regression slopes; and shadows represent 95% confidence intervals. *: padj < 0.05, **: padj < 0.01. CERAD, Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s disease; FDG, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose; SUVR , standardized uptake value ratio; Banks Sup Temp Sulcus, banks of the superior temporal sulcus; ventral DC, ventral diencephalon.

Lastly, we evaluated whether hypometabolism mediated the memory correlates of Aβ and tau pathology in relevant brain regions in the imaging sub-sample (n = 48) while adjusting for PSEN1 mutation status. Region-specific mediations were observed. In the precuneus and caudal middle frontal, the effect of PiB DVR or FTP SUVR on memory was independent of FDG SUVR as the exposure-outcome pathway was statistically significant (total and direct effects) while the mediator-outcome pathway was not (indirect effect; Fig. 4AB). In the inferior temporal, FDG SUVR partially mediated the association between PiB DVR and memory [total effect: β = −0.715, 95% CI (−1.188, −0.280), P = 0.002; direct effect: β = −0.500, 95% CI (−0.961, −0.050), P = 0.022; indirect effect: β = −0.215, 95% CI (−0.487, −0.020), P = 0.026; proportion mediated: 30%] as well as between FTP SUVR and memory [total effect: β = −0.578, 95% CI (−1.089, −0.310), P < 0.001; direct effect: β = −0.421, 95% CI (−0.753, −0.180), P = 0.006; indirect effect: β = −0.157, 95% CI (−0.422, −0.010), P = 0.042; proportion mediated: 27%; Fig. 4C]. In the hippocampus, FDG SUVR was associated with memory beyond PiB DVR [total effect: β = −0.246, 95% CI (−0.637, 1.150), P = 0.580], while the association between FTP SUVR and memory was unaffected by FDG SUVR (mediator-outcome not significant; Fig. 4D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mediator role of glucose metabolism on the memory correlates of Aβ and tau pathology. Associations of PiB DVR and FTP SUVR with memory performance (CERAD’s word list learning) mediated by FDG SUVR in the precuneus (A), caudal middle frontal (B), inferior temporal (C) and hippocampus (D) in the imaging sub-sample (n = 48). Mediation was performed with bootstrapping. Arrows indicate the effect of the exposure on the outcome. Solid/dashed lines represent statistically significant/non-significant associations (P < 0.05). The total and direct effects are the effects of the exposure on the outcome before and after accounting for the mediator, respectively; the indirect effect is the contribution of the mediator on the total effect; and the proportion mediated is the indirect effect over the total effect. Results are represented as standardized regression coefficients. *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001. DVR, distribution value ratio; FDG, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose; FTP, [18F]flortaucipir; PiB, [11C]Pittsburgh compound B; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio.

Discussion

Aβ and tau accumulation precede neurodegeneration in AD but their contribution to glucose hypometabolism and downstream cognition remains unclear. Thus, this multi-modal imaging study aimed to explore the local and global effects of Aβ and tau pathology on glucose metabolism as well as their interplay in memory decline in PSEN1 E280A mutation carriers from the COLBOS Biomarker Study. We observed glucose metabolism reductions in parietal brain regions in PSEN1 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers, which correlated with closer age to symptom onset. In carriers, hypometabolism correlated with greater tau accumulation in the medial temporal lobe, parietal and prefrontal regions, and with greater Aβ accumulation in the inferior temporal. These correlations were mainly explained by global pathology, except for frontal hypometabolism, which co-localized with tau accumulation independently of global tau pathology. Moreover, hypometabolism in the medial temporal lobe correlated with memory impairment in carriers. We found a region-specific interplay between AD biomarkers, glucose hypometabolism and memory performance, with hypometabolism in the inferior temporal mediating the effects of Aβ and tau burden on memory decline. Our study provides a comprehensive examination of the synergy between AD-specific pathology and hypometabolism and their impact on clinical symptoms that can help improve knowledge of the spatial and temporal progression of AD.

Glucose hypometabolism was most prominent in the precuneus and isthmus cingulate in PSEN1 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers. In these brain regions, hypometabolism correlated with age in carriers and started to deviate from non-carriers approximately 15 and 12 years before the estimated age of MCI onset, respectively. This is in line with previous work carried out in ADAD showing precuneus hypometabolism 10–15 years prior to onset.10-12,53 Notably, in our Colombian kindred, cortical Aβ burden is elevated in PSEN1 mutation carriers 16 years before MCI diagnosis.11 Beyond parietal regions, we also found a trend for hypometabolism in the superior temporal and middle frontal gyri in carriers compared to non-carriers, consistent with other ADAD studies.26,53,54 This pattern matches the well-known hypometabolism in typical sporadic AD in which parietal, temporal and frontal regions are progressively affected with disease severity.3,5,7-9,55-57 However, hemispheric asymmetries in PSEN1 mutation carriers and normal aging should be further explored to obtain insights into disease-driven heterogeneities. Though early-onset AD patients present more severe hypometabolism in the precuneus than late-onset AD patients,37 our findings support a common pathophysiology between ADAD and sporadic AD that renders the precuneus metabolically vulnerable and demonstrate the value of ADAD to study the spatio-temporal disease trajectory.

Similarly, PSEN1 mutation carriers displayed greater Aβ and tau accumulation than non-carriers, following typical patterns in ADAD.26  ,52,58 We observed regional correlations between greater tau burden and lower metabolism in the inferior temporal, entorhinal cortex, inferior parietal and isthmus cingulate. Previous studies have reported similar correlations in late-onset23-25,59 as well as early-onset AD.18,26 We further revealed that most correlations were no longer significant when controlled for global tau pathology. To our knowledge, our study is the first to account for local and global effects of pathology in ADAD. Though FDG-PET and FTP-PET are typically assumed to overlap and predict neuronal loss,1 our findings suggest a lack of local specificity between hypometabolism and tau accumulation in temporo-parietal brain regions, which is in agreement with the regional discrepancy between early tau deposition in the medial temporal lobe52,60 and early hypometabolism in the precuneus and posterior cingulate in AD. This discrepancy alludes to the idea of distant effects of tau pathology on hypometabolism, which originated from studies reporting tau-metabolism correlations in different but functionally connected brain regions.23,24

In contrast, we found a correlation between hypometabolism and tau accumulation in the caudal and rostral middle frontal regions, which was independent of global tau pathology. This suggests co-localization of tau tangles and deficient glucose utilization in the prefrontal cortex, a hub of the default mode network (DMN) that plays an important role in regulating complex cognition and behaviour.61 In this kindred, our group has shown that greater tau is linked with lower functional connectivity in the DMN, mainly in the precuneus and prefrontal cortex.62 Moreover, tau deposition, functional connectivity and metabolic covariance patterns have been shown to closely converge in sporadic AD.63,64 Despite higher Aβ pathology in the prefrontal cortex in PSEN1 mutation carriers than non-carriers, the correlation between frontal tau accumulation and hypometabolism was mostly independent of Aβ accumulation, consistent with previous studies.13,30,65 Thus, frontal hypometabolism in our cohort could reflect dysconnectivity and neurodegeneration locally induced by the early spread of tau from the medial temporal lobe. More studies are critically needed to explore metabolic and functional networks in ADAD.

Despite cortex-wide Aβ accumulation in PSEN1 mutation carriers, the regional association between Aβ burden and lower glucose metabolism was restricted to the inferior temporal gyrus in carriers. This correlation was mainly dependent on the global presence of Aβ, in line with observations in sporadic AD,22 indicating that inferior temporal hypometabolism does not result from regional deposits of fibrillary Aβ plaques. Some studies have observed local correlations between Aβ deposition and hypometabolism in temporo-parietal regions,19-21 whereas others found no correlations across the brain either in sporadic AD15-17,59,65-67 or ADAD.18 It has been proposed that long-term exposure to Aβ rather than absolute burden could lead to more severe hypometabolism or that the detrimental effect on metabolism is due to toxic Aβ oligomers instead of fibrillar Aβ as imaged by PiB-PET.37 This lack of correlation between Aβ and hypometabolism could also be interpreted as Aβ not playing a prominent role in ongoing neurodegeneration after reaching a plateau.

The link between reduced glucose metabolism and cognitive decline has been well described. Across the AD continuum, hypometabolism in the temporal lobe and posterior cingulate is associated with memory impairment, visuospatial and language deficits as well as global cognitive dysfunction.6,29,31,32,35,68 In our study, we also observed that lower glucose metabolism in the hippocampus, inferior temporal and entorhinal was associated with worse memory performance in PSEN1 mutation carriers. Notably, these regions are involved in tau spatial spread, which highly correlates with cognition.14,69 Cognitive correlates of Aβ are, however, poorly understood,33,67 calling into question the contribution of AD hallmarks to memory deficits. We found that the interplay between Aβ, tau and glucose metabolism in memory performance was region-specific. In the precuneus and caudal middle frontal, greater Aβ and tau burden were associated with worse memory independently of hypometabolism. Similarly, in the hippocampus, the association between tau and memory deficits was not mediated by hypometabolism. This indicates that Aβ and tau pathology may affect cognition synergistically prior to neurodegeneration and supports the temporal ordering of events theorized in AD.1 Given the closer link between tau and hypometabolism in these regions, our findings also offer evidence for the role of tau as the primary driver of downstream pathology, as widely proposed in the literature.27,70

Interestingly, we found concurrent higher Aβ and tau accumulation, lower glucose metabolism and lower memory performance in the inferior temporal in PSEN1 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers. The correlation between Aβ and hypometabolism was considerably reduced when controlling for local tau accumulation, in line with a study revealing that Aβ burden had an indirect effect on cerebral blood flow and volume in the inferior temporal gyrus via tau accumulation,13 considering that glucose hypometabolism mirrors both brain atrophy and brain hypoperfusion.71,72 However, the partial correlation between hypometabolism and tau controlling for Aβ accumulation, also remained significant, suggesting an intricate relationship between AD pathology and metabolic deficits in the inferior temporal. Both greater Aβ and tau burden were associated with worse memory, yet these effects were partially mediated (30%) by hypometabolism in this region. While mediation results must be interpreted with caution due to the non-causal exploratory nature of this statistical approach and the limited sample size, they suggest that these biomarkers might be independent contributors to cognitive decline in ADAD. These findings align with studies showing that hypometabolism may predict cognitive decline independently of tau in sporadic AD and ADAD.34,35,73 The potential FDG-PET’s ability to independently predict cognitive decline might be explained by hypometabolism being closer in time to symptom onset compared to Aβ and tau accumulation. We could hypothesize that the mechanisms through which inefficient glucose utilization in certain vulnerable brain regions leads to neurodegeneration may occur regardless of the presence of AD pathology,74 which would have important implications in disease management. Ultimately, our findings contribute to the growing evidence that supports the introduction of combination therapy aiming to slow down cognitive decline due to tau pathology as well as deficient glucose utilization. Overall, the present study describes a model where pathology advances and interacts in a region-specific manner to impact clinical outcomes, underscoring the importance of differential regional vulnerability in AD, with FDG-PET demonstrating to be an invaluable biomarker to unveil the spatial progression of pathology. More studies of how regional glucose hypometabolism relates to the wider spectrum of cognitive domains are warranted to provide a more comprehensive understanding of regional vulnerability expression and clinical interpretation of FDG-PET.

Although the examination of a single ADAD mutation provides methodological and conceptual benefits, this study has multiple limitations. Our Colombian kindred has a high load of Aβ pathology but not tau pathology compared to sporadic AD,58 which limits the generalizability of our findings. In addition, the small sample size precludes us from building more complex mediation models to further investigate the intercorrelations between the different biomarkers. Other methodological limitations include the lack of medication data among carriers and the reference region selection, which may be prone to off-target binding of FTP.75 Moreover, the cross-sectional nature of this study hinders causal interpretations of our mediation findings. To that end, longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the interactions between progression of Aβ, tau and glucose hypometabolism across the AD spectrum. Finally, FDG-PET is an unspecific marker of brain health that reflects not only neurodegeneration, but vascular dysfunction as well, which was not accounted for in this study.71,72,76 Our study also has multiple strengths. This unique cohort of PSEN1 mutation carriers with multi-modal imaging available has a deterministic trajectory of pathological and clinical decline. Given that the mean age of symptom onset is 44 years old,36 we are able to examine different biomarkers without the confound of normal aging. Additionally, due to the young age of this cohort, the prevalence of other potential confounders such as vascular risk is relatively low.

Supplementary Material

fcaf508_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

We thank the Colombian families with ADAD for contributing their time to this study and for their continued commitment to this research. We also thank Francisco Piedrahita, Alex Navarro, and Liliana Lopez from Grupo de Neurociencias de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia in Medellín, Colombia as well as Diana Munera, Alex Badillo Cabrera and Nikole Bonillas Felix from the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, MA, USA, for helping coordinate visits to Boston and assisting with data collection and processing. This work was supported by Harvard Catalyst consulting services.

Contributor Information

Catarina Tristão-Pereira, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Stephanie Langella, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Ana Baena, Grupo de Neurociencias de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia.

Natalia Londono, Grupo de Neurociencias de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia.

Justin S Sanchez, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Lusiana Martinez, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Sergio Alvarez, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín 050034, Colombia.

Monica Vidal, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín 050034, Colombia.

David Aguillon, Grupo de Neurociencias de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia.

Yi Su, Banner Alzheimer’s Institute and Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA.

Hillary Protas, Banner Alzheimer’s Institute and Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA.

Michael J Properzi, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA.

Vincent Malotaux, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Bing He, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Averi Giudicessi, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Eric M Reiman, Banner Alzheimer’s Institute and Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA.

Bernard J Hanseeuw, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1348, Belgium.

Yakeel T Quiroz, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Grupo de Neurociencias de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Brain Communications online.

Funding

S.L. was supported by the Alzheimer’s Association (AARF-22-920754). Y.T.Q. and F.L. received funding from the U.S National Institute on Aging (no. R01AG077627), the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Executive Committee on Research (MGH Research Scholar Award), the Alzheimer’s Association and the U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (grant RM1NS132996). The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. All other co-authors have nothing to disclose.

Competing interests

Y.T.Q. has served as a consultant for Biogen. E.M.R is a co-founder and advisor for ALZpath and a compensated member of the Alzheon, Beren Therapeutics, Denali, Enigma Diagnostics, Jocanta Therapeutics, Retromer Therapeutics, and Vaxxinity Scientific Advisory Boards. All other co-authors report no competing interests.

Data availability

Anonymized clinical, genetic and imaging data are available upon request, subject to an internal review by Y.T.Q. to ensure that the participants’ anonymity, confidentiality, and PSEN1 E280A carrier or non-carrier status are protected. Data requests will be considered based on a proposal review, and completion of a data sharing agreement, in accordance with the University of Antioquia and Mass General Brigham institutional guidelines. Please submit data requests to Y.T.Q.

References

  • 1. Jack  CR, Andrews  JS, Beach  TG, et al.  Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer’s disease: Alzheimer’s Association Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(8):5143–5169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chételat  G, Landeau  B, Salmon  E, et al.  Relationships between brain metabolism decrease in normal aging and changes in structural and functional connectivity. NeuroImage. 2013;76:167–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Reiman  EM, Caselli  RJ, Yun  LS, et al.  Preclinical evidence of Alzheimer’s disease in persons homozygous for the ε4 allele for apolipoprotein E. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(12):752–758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Knopman  DS, Jack  CR, Lundt  ES, et al.  Evolution of neurodegeneration-imaging biomarkers from clinically normal to dementia in the Alzheimer disease spectrum. Neurobiol Aging.  2016;46:32–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Nestor  PJ, Fryer  TD, Ikeda  M, Hodges  JR. Retrosplenial cortex (BA 29/30) hypometabolism in mild cognitive impairment (prodromal Alzheimer’s disease). Eur J Neurosci.  2003;18(9):2663–2667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mosconi  L, De Santi  S, Li  J, et al.  Hippocampal hypometabolism predicts cognitive decline from normal aging. Neurobiol Aging.  2008;29(5):676–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Minoshima  S, Giordani  B, Berent  S, Frey  KA, Foster  NL, Kuhl  DE. Metabolic reduction in the posterior cingulate cortex in very early Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol.  1997;42(1):85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Herholz  K, Nordberg  A, Salmon  E, et al.  Impairment of neocortical metabolism predicts progression in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1999;10(6):494–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fouquet  M, Desgranges  B, Landeau  B, et al.  Longitudinal brain metabolic changes from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2009;132(8):2058–2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Bateman  RJ, Xiong  C, Benzinger  TLS, et al.  Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):795–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Fleisher  AS, Chen  K, Quiroz  YT, et al.  Associations between biomarkers and age in the Presenilin 1 E280A autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease kindred: A cross-sectional study. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(3):316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gordon  BA, Blazey  TM, Su  Y, et al.  Spatial patterns of neuroimaging biomarker change in individuals from families with autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease: A longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol.  2018;17(3):241–250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Bilgel  M, Wong  DF, Moghekar  AR, Ferrucci  L, Resnick  SM; the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative . Causal links among amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration. Brain Commun.  2022;4(4):fcac193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bejanin  A, Schonhaut  DR, La Joie  R, et al.  Tau pathology and neurodegeneration contribute to cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2017;140(12):3286–3300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Furst  AJ, Rabinovici  GD, Rostomian  AH, et al.  Cognition, glucose metabolism and amyloid burden in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging.  2012;33(2):215–225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jagust  WJ, Landau  SM. For the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. Apolipoprotein E, not fibrillar β-amyloid, reduces cerebral glucose metabolism in normal aging. J Neurosci. 2012;32(50):18227–18233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. La Joie  R, Perrotin  A, Barré  L, et al.  Region-specific hierarchy between atrophy, hypometabolism, and β-Amyloid (Aβ) load in Alzheimer’s disease dementia. J Neurosci. 2012;32(46):16265–16273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Smith  R, Wibom  M, Olsson  T, et al.  Posterior accumulation of tau and concordant hypometabolism in an early-onset Alzheimer’s disease patient with presenilin-1 mutation. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(2):339–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Klunk  WE, Engler  H, Nordberg  A, et al.  Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh compound-B. Ann Neurol.  2004;55(3):306–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Edison  P, Archer  HA, Hinz  R, et al.  Amyloid, hypometabolism, and cognition in Alzheimer disease: An [11C]PIB and [18F]FDG PET study. Neurology. 2007;68(7):501–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Cohen  AD, Price  JC, Weissfeld  LA, et al.  Basal cerebral metabolism may modulate the cognitive effects of Abeta in mild cognitive impairment: An example of brain reserve. J Neurosci. 2009;29(47):14770–14778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Altmann  A, Ng  B, Landau  SM, Jagust  WJ, Greicius  MD. Regional brain hypometabolism is unrelated to regional amyloid plaque burden. Brain. 2015;138(12):3734–3746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hanseeuw  BJ, Betensky  RA, Schultz  AP, et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose metabolism associated with tau-amyloid interaction predicts memory decline. Ann Neurol.  2017;81(4):583–596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ishii  K, Yamada  T, Hanaoka  K, et al.  Regional differences in glucose metabolic decline and tau deposition in the Alzheimer’s continuum brain. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2024;102(1):228–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Matthews  DC, Kinney  JW, Ritter  A, et al.  Relationships between plasma biomarkers, tau PET, FDG PET, and volumetric MRI in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease patients. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024;10(3):e12490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Gordon  BA, Blazey  TM, Christensen  J, et al.  Tau PET in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease: Relationship with cognition, dementia and other biomarkers. Brain. 2019;142(4):1063–1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Carbonell  F, McNicoll  C, Zijdenbos  AP, Bedell  BJ; for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative . Tau-related reduction of glucose metabolism in mild cognitive impairment occurs independently of APOE ε4 genotype and is influenced by Aβ. Alzheimers Dementia. 2025;21(2):e14625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Jagust  W, Gitcho  A, Sun  F, Kuczynski  B, Mungas  D, Haan  M. Brain imaging evidence of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease in normal aging. Ann Neurol.  2006;59(4):673–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chételat  G, Ossenkoppele  R, Villemagne  VL, et al.  Atrophy, hypometabolism and clinical trajectories in patients with amyloid-negative Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2016;139(9):2528–2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ossenkoppele  R, Schonhaut  DR, Schöll  M, et al.  Tau PET patterns mirror clinical and neuroanatomical variability in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2016;139(5):1551–1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Landau  SM, Harvey  D, Madison  CM, et al.  Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI. Neurobiol Aging.  2011;32(7):1207–1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jagust  WJ, Landau  SM, Shaw  LM, et al.  Relationships between biomarkers in aging and dementia. Neurology. 2009;73(15):1193–1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Landau  SM, Mintun  MA, Joshi  AD, et al.  Amyloid deposition, hypometabolism, and longitudinal cognitive decline. Ann Neurol. 2012;72(4):578–586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Mayblyum  DV, Becker  JA, Jacobs  HIL, et al.  Comparing PET and MRI biomarkers predicting cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2021;96(24):e2933–e2943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tanner  JA, Iaccarino  L, Edwards  L, et al.  Amyloid, tau and metabolic PET correlates of cognition in early and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2022;145(12):4489–4505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Acosta-Baena  N, Sepulveda-Falla  D, Lopera-Gómez  CM, et al.  Pre-dementia clinical stages in presenilin 1 E280A familial early-onset Alzheimer’s disease: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol.  2011;10(3):213–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Rabinovici  GD, Furst  AJ, Alkalay  A, et al.  Increased metabolic vulnerability in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease is not related to amyloid burden. Brain. 2010;133(2):512–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Reisberg  B. Functional assessment staging (FAST). Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(4):653–659. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Folstein  MF, Folstein  SE, McHugh  PR. Mini-mental state. J Psychiatr Res.  1975;12(3):189–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Aguirre-Acevedo  DC, Gómez  RD, Moreno  S, et al.  [Validity and reliability of the CERAD-Col neuropsychological battery]. Rev Neurol. 2007;45(11):655–660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Giudicessi  A, McDowell  CP, Martinez  JE, et al.  Cognitive outcomes in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease: A comprehensive review from a Colombian kindred with the presenilin-1 E280A mutation. J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;101(2):397–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Strauss  E, Sherman  EMS, Spreen  O, Spreen  O. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Llinàs-Reglà  J, Vilalta-Franch  J, López-Pousa  S, Calvó-Perxas  L, Torrents Rodas  D, Garre-Olmo  J. The trail making test. Assessment. 2017;24(2):183–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Fischl  B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):774–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Desikan  RS, Cabral  HJ, Hess  CP, et al.  Automated MRI measures identify individuals with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2009;132(8):2048–2057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Su  Y, D’Angelo  GM, Vlassenko  AG, et al.  Quantitative analysis of PiB-PET with FreeSurfer ROIs. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e73377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Logan  J, Fowler  JS, Volkow  ND, et al.  Graphical analysis of reversible radioligand binding from time—Activity measurements applied to [N11 C-methyl]-(−)-cocaine PET studies in human subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1990;10(5):740–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Rasmussen  JM, Lakatos  A, Van Erp  TGM, et al.  Empirical derivation of the reference region for computing diagnostic sensitive 18fluorodeoxyglucose ratios in Alzheimer’s disease based on the ADNI sample. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(3):457–466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Su  Y, Blazey  TM, Snyder  AZ, et al.  Partial volume correction in quantitative amyloid imaging. NeuroImage. 2015;107:55–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Rousset  OG, Ma  Y, Evans  AC. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: Principle and validation. J Nucl Med. 1998;39(5):904–911. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Johnson  KA, Schultz  A, Betensky  RA, et al.  Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol.  2016;79(1):110–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Sanchez  JS, Hanseeuw  BJ, Lopera  F, et al.  Longitudinal amyloid and tau accumulation in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease: Findings from the Colombia-Boston (COLBOS) biomarker study. Alz Res Therapy. 2021;13(1):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Benzinger  TLS, Blazey  T, Jack  CR, et al.  Regional variability of imaging biomarkers in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(47):E4502–E4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Mosconi  L, Sorbi  S, de Leon  MJ, et al.  Hypometabolism exceeds atrophy in presymptomatic early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(11):1778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Alexander  GE, Chen  K, Pietrini  P, Rapoport  SI, Reiman  EM. Longitudinal PET evaluation of cerebral metabolic decline in dementia: A potential outcome measure in Alzheimer’s disease treatment studies. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(5):738–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Hanseeuw  B, Dricot  L, Lhommel  R, Quenon  L, Ivanoiu  A. Patients with amyloid-negative mild cognitive impairment have cortical hypometabolism but the hippocampus is preserved. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;53(2):651–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Sala  A, Caprioglio  C, Santangelo  R, et al.  Brain metabolic signatures across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(2):256–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Fleisher  AS, Chen  K, Quiroz  YT, et al.  Florbetapir PET analysis of amyloid-β deposition in the presenilin 1 E280A autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease kindred: A cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol.  2012;11(12):1057–1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Strom  A, Iaccarino  L, Edwards  L, et al.  Cortical hypometabolism reflects local atrophy and tau pathology in symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2022;145(2):713–728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Quiroz  YT, Sperling  RA, Norton  DJ, et al.  Association between amyloid and tau accumulation in young adults with autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(5):548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Fransson  P, Marrelec  G. The precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex plays a pivotal role in the default mode network: Evidence from a partial correlation network analysis. NeuroImage. 2008;42(3):1178–1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Guzmán-Vélez  E, Diez  I, Schoemaker  D, et al.  Amyloid-β and tau pathologies relate to distinctive brain dysconnectomics in preclinical autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(15):e2113641119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Li  W, Zhang  M, Huang  R, et al.  Topographic metabolism-function relationships in Alzheimer’s disease: A simultaneous PET/MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp.  2024;45(2):e26604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Ossenkoppele  R, Iaccarino  L, Schonhaut  DR, et al.  Tau covariance patterns in Alzheimer’s disease patients match intrinsic connectivity networks in the healthy brain. Neuroimage Clin.  2019;23:101848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Bischof  GN, Jessen  F, Fliessbach  K, et al.  Impact of tau and amyloid burden on glucose metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016;3(12):934–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Li  Y, Rinne  JO, Mosconi  L, et al.  Regional analysis of FDG and PIB-PET images in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35(12):2169–2181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Ossenkoppele  R, Tolboom  N, Foster-Dingley  JC, et al.  Longitudinal imaging of Alzheimer pathology using [11C]PIB, [18F]FDDNP and [18F]FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(6):990–1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Groot  C, Risacher  SL, Chen  JQA, et al.  Differential trajectories of hypometabolism across cognitively-defined Alzheimer’s disease subgroups. Neuroimage Clin.  2021;31:102725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Tristão-Pereira  C, Langella  S, Sanchez  JS, et al.  Tau-PET pathology in the subregions of the amygdala and its associations with cognitive performance and neuropsychiatric symptoms in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Alz Res Therapy. 2025;17(1):64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Aschenbrenner  AJ, Gordon  BA, Benzinger  TLS, Morris  JC, Hassenstab  JJ. Influence of tau PET, amyloid PET, and hippocampal volume on cognition in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2018;91(9):e859–e866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Yan  L, Liu  CY, Wong  KP, et al.  Regional association of pCASL-MRI with FDG-PET and PiB-PET in people at risk for autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin.  2018;17:751–760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Ottoy  J, Verhaeghe  J, Niemantsverdriet  E, et al.  18 F-FDG PET, the early phases and the delivery rate of 18 F-AV45 PET as proxies of cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer’s disease: Validation against 15 O-H 2 O PET. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2019;15(9):1172–1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Boccalini  C, Ribaldi  F, Hristovska  I, et al.  The impact of tau deposition and hypometabolism on cognitive impairment and longitudinal cognitive decline. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2024;20(1):221–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Wirth  M, Madison  CM, Rabinovici  GD, Oh  H, Landau  SM, Jagust  WJ. Alzheimer’s disease neurodegenerative biomarkers are associated with decreased cognitive function but not β-amyloid in cognitively normal older individuals. J Neurosci. 2013;33(13):5553–5563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. López-González  FJ, Costoya-Sánchez  A, Paredes-Pacheco  J, et al.  Impact of spill-in counts from off-target regions on [18F]Flortaucipir PET quantification. Neuroimage. 2022;259:119396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Chételat  G, Arbizu  J, Barthel  H, et al.  Amyloid-PET and 18F-FDG-PET in the diagnostic investigation of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Lancet Neurol.  2020;19(11):951–962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

fcaf508_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

Anonymized clinical, genetic and imaging data are available upon request, subject to an internal review by Y.T.Q. to ensure that the participants’ anonymity, confidentiality, and PSEN1 E280A carrier or non-carrier status are protected. Data requests will be considered based on a proposal review, and completion of a data sharing agreement, in accordance with the University of Antioquia and Mass General Brigham institutional guidelines. Please submit data requests to Y.T.Q.


Articles from Brain Communications are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES