Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jan 15;2(1):e70220. doi: 10.1002/pmf2.70220

The psychological impact of childbirth: Unscheduled cesarean delivery associates with increased risk for acute stress response

Hadas Allouche‐Kam 1, Isha Hemant Arora 2, Christina T Pham 2, Eunice Chon 2, Mary Lee 2, Onyekachi Agwu 2, Jiajia Zhang 2, Evelyn Milavsky 2, Andrea G Edlow 3,4, Francine Hughes 3, Scott P Orr 5, Anjali J Kaimal 6, Sharon Dekel 1,
PMCID: PMC12818021  PMID: 41567290

Abstract

Introduction

Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States. Despite their frequency and medical necessity, the acute psychological response associated with unscheduled cesarean delivery is unknown. This study aimed to assess the rates and nature of peritraumatic stress reactions during and shortly after unscheduled cesarean delivery, and whether acute stress predicts later mental health symptoms.

Methods

A total of 1146 patients receiving routine perinatal care at a single tertiary, urban hospital were assessed for peritraumatic stress reactions during the delivery hospitalization, on average 31 hours postpartum using the patient self‐report Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI). A subgroup (n = 795; 69.4%) completed an assessment at approximately 1.9 months postpartum. Delivery mode, obstetric complications, prior trauma exposure, and antepartum and postpartum psychiatric symptoms were obtained from questionnaires and medical records. Chi‐square tests, adjusted relative risk estimates, mixed‐effects models, and regression analyses were used to evaluate acute stress by delivery mode, its persistence over time, and associations with postpartum mental health outcomes.

Results

A total of 10.4% of participants met criteria for clinical acute stress (PDI ≥15). Among women undergoing unscheduled cesarean, 26.6% reported clinical stress, with higher rates observed for cesarean performed during labor (29.3%) and those with greater obstetric morbidity (ρ = 0.20, p = 0.005). Compared with vaginal delivery, unscheduled cesarean delivery was associated with a fourfold increased risk of acute stress (26.6% vs. 6.3%; relative risk = 4.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.92–6.05). Adjusting for the interval between delivery and PDI completion (hours), demographics, primiparity, obstetric complications, labor induction, prior trauma, and antepartum mental health, unscheduled cesarean remained associated with increased risk. Stress levels among patients undergoing unscheduled cesareans were persistently elevated over time (estimate = 0.39, p = 0.44), while vaginal delivery was associated with a significant symptom reduction (estimate = 0.52, p = 0.03). Acute responses strongly predicted subsequent posttraumatic stress disorder (β = 0.48, p < 0.001) and depressive (β = 0.30, p < 0.001) symptoms and maternal–infant bonding (β = 0.32, p < 0.001) difficulties.

Conclusions

A substantial proportion of women undergoing unscheduled cesarean delivery experience significant psychological stress during childbirth with enduring morbidities. Screening for acute traumatic stress during postpartum stay is warranted to optimize mental health outcomes.

Keywords: childbirth trauma, childbirth‐related PTSD, maternal mental health, maternal morbidity, postpartum depression, postpartum screening, unscheduled cesarean: unplanned cesarean

1. INTRODUCTION

Childbirth represents one of the most physiologically intense experiences in human life, involving a coordinated surge in neuroendocrine, autonomic, immune, and pain‐regulatory activity to facilitate labor and delivery and maternal adaptation [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Specifically, there are drastic changes in hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (HPA) regulation with heightened sympathetic activity and rapid parasympathetic restoration in the immediate postpartum [6, 7, 8].

A substantial percentage of births (∼32%) in the United States are by cesarean delivery (CD) [9], a major surgical procedure [10, 11] that in many cases is unscheduled or emergent [12]. An estimated one in five women in the first delivery undergo an unscheduled CD [13, 14] that is typically performed during active labor due to failure to progress or non‐reassuring fetal assessment [13, 14, 15] and intended to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality [16]. Existing data show that unscheduled CD and/or the underlying indications for the procedure can be associated with short‐ and long‐term medical implications for maternal (e.g., increased risk of repeat cesarean and abnormal placentation in subsequent pregnancies) and infant health (e.g., increased risk of respiratory distress and altered gut microbiota) [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. However, far less is known about the psychological consequences of unscheduled CD, particularly its acute emotional impact and its enduring impact.

Unscheduled CD and the circumstances surrounding it may fulfill diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM‐5) Criterion A for exposure to a traumatic event, involving real or perceived threats to life or serious injury, either to the self or to others [23]. The unanticipated need for major surgery, especially in the context of prior physiological and emotional strain during active labor, may provoke intense emotional responses and perceived traumatization [24]. A large body of research has documented peritraumatic stress reactions that occur during or immediately after a traumatic event across various trauma‐exposed samples [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33]. These responses are shown to be strong predictors of subsequent posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34], even more so than pre‐trauma vulnerability factors [32, 35]. Understanding the magnitude of peritraumatic stress associated with unscheduled CD, during an important time for the formation of maternal–infant bonding, may have implications for targeted screening and implementations of clinical approaches in labor and delivery and postpartum units to enhance postoperative recovery.

We hypothesized that given the potential traumatic experience of unscheduled CD and its acuity, compared to other delivery modes, it would be associated with more clinically significant acute stress responses during childbirth, accounting for prepartum and peripartum factors, which would remain enduring in the early postpartum period; and that acute stress predicts subsequent mental health symptoms and bonding problems.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Study population

A total of 1146 women who recently gave birth and received routine perinatal care at a single tertiary, urban hospital, and completed an immediate postpartum assessment for acute stress were included in this study. Of these women, 340 (29.7%) underwent CD and 806 (70.3%) delivered vaginally. All participants were assessed during the third trimester for mental health and prior trauma (Time point 0), then on average 31 hours postdelivery (range = 0.4–120 hours) (Time point 1), primarily through in‐person evaluations conducted during their maternity hospitalization. A subgroup (n = 795, 69.4%) completed a second postpartum assessment approximately at 1.92 months post delivery (range = 0.6–2.67) (Time point 2). Completers were different on demographic background (i.e., maternal age, education, income, marital status, race and ethnicity), antepartum PTSD symptoms, and use of epidural. The sample is derived from two prospective, longitudinal cohorts of studies on the mental health sequelae and childbirth experiences. The cohorts targeted the similar population: third‐trimester patients who planned to deliver at the study hospital with recruitment occurring at different time periods: Cohort 1 between October 2016 and October 2022, excluding participants who gave birth during the COVID pandemic, with enrollment during routine perinatal visits and Cohort 2 from March 2023 with data available through January 2025 with recruitment via hospital's Patient Gateway portal. While the cohorts were largely the same on background factors, cohort 2 entailed more underrepresented minorities (Black and Hispanic), participants with higher income, and more antenatal depression and trauma history. Participants provided implied consent by completing the study questionnaires via Redcap after receiving detailed information about study procedures. The studies were approved by the hospital's Human Research Committee.

3. MEASURES

3.1. Mental health

Acute stress reactions to childbirth were assessed using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) [31]. This is a 13‐item questionnaire that measures emotional and physiological responses experienced during and shortly after a traumatic event [31]. Responses are rated on a 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Extremely true) scale with higher total scores indicating greater distress. The PDI demonstrates strong reliability and validity across trauma‐exposed populations and postpartum samples [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39]; and clinical cutoff scores inform PTSD risk [27, 29, 30, 31, 40]. A cutoff score of 15 (excluding item 4) has been suggested to identify individuals at risk for childbirth‐related PTSD [41] and was used in the present study. Reliability of the PDI was high (α = 0.83).

Depression symptoms were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the recommended screening tool for peripartum depression in clinical settings [42, 43]. EPDS scores were primarily obtained from participants’ medical records. A score of 13 or higher was used as the clinical cutoff indicating probable depression [42, 43, 44, 45].

PTSD symptoms were measured with the well‐validated PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5), a 20‐item self‐report questionnaire that assesses DSM‐5 PTSD symptoms [46, 47]. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Extremely); higher total scores reflect greater symptom severity. The PCL‐5 demonstrates strong validity [47, 48], including in perinatal populations [49, 50]. A cutoff of 32 is used for a provisional PTSD diagnosis [47, 49, 51]. Reliability was high (for pregnancy, α = 0.93; for postpartum assessment specified to recent childbirth, α = 0.91).

Maternal–infant bonding problems were measured with the Maternal Attachment Inventory (MAI) [52]. This is a 26‐item self‐report questionnaire designed to assess mother's emotions and perceptions towards the infant and aligns with observational assessments. Items are rated on a 4‐point scale, with higher scores indicating stronger perceived bonding impairment (α = 0.92).

Trauma history was assessed using the Life Events Checklist for DSM‐5 (LEC‐5) [53], which captures exposure to various traumatic events (e.g., natural disasters, physical or sexual assault, sudden accidental death). The total number of events endorsed as “happened to me” was summed to generate a total trauma exposure score.

3.2. Obstetric information

Delivery mode based on electronic medical record data was categorized as vaginal, assisted vaginal (i.e., vacuum/forceps extraction), scheduled CD (including elective and/or clinically indicated), and unscheduled CD (including emergent cases based on the physician's indication). The latter group was categorized into non‐laboring (i.e., before the initiation of contractions, e.g., premature rupture of membranes (PROM) non‐vertex/non‐trail of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) candidate, newly diagnosed macrosomia, etc.) and laboring specified as; first or second stage of labor. Severity of obstetric complications was classified as: severe, life‐threatening conditions per the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) [54] (e.g., uterine rupture, eclampsia and unplanned hysterectomy); moderate, significant morbidity or long‐term risk (e.g., fetal labor intolerance, hemorrhage ≥1500 cc, blood transfusion, third/fourth‐degree lacerations, and infant health complications); mild, short‐term complications (e.g., manual placenta removal without hemorrhage and failure to progress); or none. Additional medical record data included gestational age at delivery, primiparity, labor induction, and epidural administration.

3.3. Analysis

Missing data for single items for mental health measures (i.e., PDI, PCL‐5, EPDS, MAI for 3.04% of the mental health data) and other factors (i.e., demographics, trauma history, and obstetrical data for 3.85% of these data) (3.15% of the total data) were determined to be missing completely at random (MCAR) (Little's MCAR Test, χ2(10,901) = 4548.0, p = 1). Relevant missing information was handled with multiple imputation using the “mice” package in R [55]. Descriptive statistics were computed using proportions for categorical variables and means with standard deviations for continuous variables. Differences in rates of significant acute stress (PDI ≥15) and background, obstetrics, and mental health data were evaluated across delivery modes using chi‐square tests of independence (or Fisher's exact test) and analysis of variance performed for continuous variables. Comparisons for acute stress (primary outcome) by delivery mode included adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and were computed using log‐binomial regression, controlling for the interval between delivery and PDI completion (hours), demographics, mental health, and obstetric factors, if associated with PDI score (p ≤ 0.10). A repeated measures linear mixed model with Kenward–Roger adjustment was used to assess stability of stress levels between time points and across delivery modes, adjusting for identified contributors with planned post hoc analyses using estimated marginal means (EMMs) and Sidak adjustment to identify between‐ and within‐group changes. Stress rates were stratified by severity of obstetric complications (and labor stage for unscheduled CD). We further examined childbirth‐related PTSD, postpartum depression and maternal–infant bonding as secondary outcomes, using a regression analysis for the prediction of these outcomes by acute stress, controlling for obstetric factors. Statistical analyses were conducted in R (version 4.3.0) [56].

4. RESULTS

The mean maternal age was 33.7 (SD = 4.07) years; 38.4% of participants were primiparous. Most women (95%) delivered at full‐term and 70.3% had vaginal delivery, while 29.7% underwent CD. Obstetric complications were identified in 36.9% of cases with 0.2% life‐threatening complications. Table 1 presents sample demographics, prepartum mental health status, and obstetric information, all stratified by delivery mode.

TABLE 1.

Demographics, mental health, and obstetric factors by mode of delivery.

Mode of delivery

Unscheduled cesarean

(n = 192)

Scheduled cesarean

(n = 148)

Vaginal

(n = 744)

Assisted vaginal

(n = 62)

Characteristics n/M (%/SD) n/M (%/SD) n/M (%/SD) n/M (%/SD) F/χ 2/V
Demographics
Maternal age at delivery 33.6b (4.35) 35.24a (4.38) 33.52b (3.92) 32.85b (3.53) 8.56 ***
Not married/domestic partnership 11 (5.73) 7 (4.73) 33 (4.44) 1 (1.61) 0.04
Education < bachelor's degree 32 (16.67) 22 (14.86) 81 (10.89) 4 (6.45) 0.08 +
Household income < $100,000 50 (26.04) 29 (19.59) 147 (19.76) 10 (16.13) 4.65
Hispanic 28 (14.58) 17 (11.49) 81 (10.89) 5 (8.06) 0.04
Black or African American 10 (5.21) 10 (6.76) 36 (4.84) 2 (3.23) 0.05
Mental health
Trauma history 134 (69.79) 100 (67.57) 484 (65.05) 41 (66.13) 1.67
Antepartum depression α 9 (4.95) 4 (2.94) 20 (2.92) 1 (1.64) 0.05
Antepartum PTSD α 10b (5.99) 7b (5.38) 15a (2.31) 4b (7.27) 0.10 *
Obstetrics
Primiparity 95a (49.48) 35b (23.65) 269c (36.16) 41a (66.13) 45.32 ***
Gestational age 39.3a,b (1.67) 38.95a (1.5) 39.5b (1.31) 39.47b (1.22) 6.6 ***
Labor induction 92b (47.92) 8a (5.41) 319b (42.88) 34b (54.84) 87.31 ***
Epidural 153b (79.69) 57a (38.51) 601b (80.78) 55b (88.71) 128.57 ***
Complications, labor, and delivery
Mild 79b (41.15) 33a (22.30) 73c (9.81) 7a,c (11.29) 112.2 ***
Moderate 104b (54.17) 18a (12.16) 75a (10.08) 31b (50) 227.28 ***
Severe 1 (0.52) 1 (0.68) 1 (0.13) 0 0.04

Note: Unscheduled cesarean delivery (CD) = unscheduled (n = 167) and emergent (n = 25) CD; trauma history = number of traumatic events “happened to me” using the Life Event Checklist for DSM‐5 (LEC‐5); depression, pregnancy = Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS ≥13) indicating probable depression; PTSD, pregnancy = Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5 ≥32) indicating probable PTSD; epidural for scheduled cesarean delivery includes epidural or combined spinal‐epidural; obstetric complications = mild (i.e., short‐term complications), moderate (i.e., significant morbidity or long‐term risk), and severe (i.e., life threatening conditions). The highest complication severity was counted for participants with more than one complication. Means and counts with different superscript letters are significantly different at p < 0.1 based on Sidak adjustment. For categorical variables with participants counts less than 5, Fisher's exact test was applied, and Cramer's V was calculated to quantify effect size. Missing information on demographics (age, marital status, education, and income), mental health (trauma history, and antepartum depression and PTSD) and obstetric information (primiparity) were handeled using data imputation.

Abbreviation: PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.

α

Missing responses corrected only for individual items, hence n is smaller.

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.

***

p < 0.001.

+

p < 0.1.

At the immediate postpartum assessment (∼31 hours postpartum), 10.5% (n = 120) of the sample reported clinical stress (PDI ≥15) occurring during childbirth or immediately after. At the later time point (∼1.9 months postpartum), 9.6% (n = 76) continued to meet this threshold. Stress responses were associated with the obstetric complications severity (ρ = 0.28, p < 0.001) (Table S1).

4.1. Acute stress reactions to childbirth and delivery mode

Among participants who underwent unscheduled CD, 26.6% endorsed clinically significant acute stress reactions. Rates varied by stage of labor during which the unscheduled CD was performed: 14.3% when non‐laboring (5/35), 25.3% in the first stage (23/91), and 34.9% during the second stage (23/66) (Table 2). Rates were higher for unscheduled CD during laboring in comparison to non‐laboring (χ2(1) = 3.31, p = 0.07) and stress levels were associated with obstetric complications severity, ρ = 0.20, p = 0.005 (20.3% and 33.7% in patients with minor and moderate complications, respectively). In contrast, acute stress rates were 6.3% among participants with vaginal delivery and 22.6% in assisted vaginal delivery (28.6% and 29.0% in minor and moderate obstetric complications) (Table 3).

TABLE 2.

Acute stress response by labor stage and obstetric morbidity in unscheduled cesarean delivery.

Complication severity

Acute stress

(PDI ≥15)

Labor stage n (%)
Non‐laboring None 0
Mild 3 (15.79)
Moderate 2 (14.29)
Severe
First stage None 0
Mild 4 (14.29)
Moderate 19 (33.33)
Severe
Second stage None
Mild 9 (28.13)
Moderate 14 (42.42)
Severe 0

Note: Acute stress reactions to recent childbirth measured in the immediate postpartum (∼31 h) using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI), clinical cutoff (≥15); labor stages during performance of unscheduled cesarean delivery = non‐laboring (n = 35): prior to initiation of contractions (e.g., PROM non‐vertex/non‐TOLAC candidate, newly diagnosed macrosomia, etc.) and laboring with regard to the stages of labor; first stage (n = 91): from onset of labor to full cervical dilation; and second stage (n = 66): full dilation to fetal delivery; obstetric complications severity = mild: short‐term complications; moderate: significant morbidity or long‐term risk, including infant health complications; and severe: life‐threatening conditions. For multiple complications, the highest severity of complication was counted. n = 192.

TABLE 3.

Acute stress response by delivery mode and obstetric morbidity.

Delivery mode Complication severity Acute stress
M SD Range PDI ≥15
n (%)
Unscheduled cesarean None 1.88 3 [0–8] 0
Mild 8.56 6.97 [0–24] 16 (20.25)
Moderate 11.37 9.65 [0–44] 35 (33.65)
Severe [14] 0
Scheduled cesarean None 3.65 4.72 [0–26] 3 (3.13)
Mild 4 3.94 [0–14] 0
Moderate 8.78 8.04 [0–27] 5 (27.78)
Severe [11] 0
Vaginal None 4.65 4.97 [0–30] 31 (5.21)
Mild 4.93 5.31 [0–26] 6 (8.22)
Moderate 8.35 7 [0–39] 10 (13.33)
Severe [12] 0
Assisted vaginal None 7.96 8.54 [0–37] 3 (12.50)
Mild 6.71 6.45 [0–15] 2 (28.57)
Moderate 10.97 10.01 [0–37] 9 (29.03)
Severe

Note: Acute stress pertains to reactions during or immediately after childbirth measured in the immediate postpartum (∼31 h) using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) clinical cutoff (≥15); delivery modes: unscheduled cesarean = unscheduled (n = 167) and emergent (n = 25) cesarean delivery; scheduled cesarean delivery (n = 148); vaginal delivery (n = 744); and assisted vaginal delivery (n = 62). Obstetric complications severity = mild: short‐term complications; moderate: significant morbidity or long‐term risk, including infant health complications; and severe: life‐threatening conditions. For multiple complications, only the highest severity of complication was counted.

Table 4 presents the risk for acute stress by delivery mode. The rate of clinically significant acute stress was higher in response to unscheduled CD, compared to other modes (excluding assisted vaginal delivery) (χ2(3) = 80.47, p < 0.001). At the immediate postpartum assessment, the relative risk (RR) of acute stress in unscheduled CD, compared to vaginal delivery, was 4.20 (confidence interval [CI], 2.92–6.05). Accounting for contributors associated with acute stress levels (p ≤ 0.10) (i.e., time interval between delivery and PDI completion, maternal age, education, income, primiparity, antenatal depression/PTSD, induction, and obstetric complications), aRR was 2.60 (CI, 1.59–4.24). The unscheduled CD group also had higher risk for acute stress compared to scheduled CD (RR = 4.91; CI, 2.41–10.03; aRR = 3.25; CI, 1.37–7.72).

TABLE 4.

Acute stress responses to childbirth by mode of delivery.

Acute stress
Mode of delivery Acute stress (PDI ≥15), n (%) χ2 Relative risk [95% CI] M SD Range
Unscheduled cesarean 51 (26.56) 80.47 *** Reference 9.83 8.66 [0–44]
Scheduled cesarean 8 (5.41) 4.91 *** [2.41–10.03] 4.40 5.32 [0–27]
3.25 ** [1.37–7.72] a
Vaginal 47 (6.32) 4.20 *** [2.92–6.05] 5.06 5.35 [0–39]
2.60 *** [1.59–4.24] a
Assisted vaginal 14 (22.58) 1.25 [0.65–2.41] 9.32 9.15 [0–37]
1.19 [0.73–1.94] a

Note: Participants assessment completed ∼31 h after childbirth (n = 1146). Stress response measured using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) clinical cutoff ≥15 using unscheduled cesarean delivery (CD) as a reference group. Unscheduled CD = unscheduled (n = 167) and emergent (n = 25) CD; scheduled CD (n = 148); vaginal delivery (n = 744); and assisted vaginal delivery (n = 62).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.

a

Adjusted relative risk in reference to unscheduled CD accounting for maternal age, education, income, trauma history, antepartum depression and PTSD, primiparity, labor induction, and obstetric complications.

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.

***

p < 0.001.

+

p < 0.1.

Commonly endorsed acute stress items for women who had unscheduled CD included having physical stress reactions (64.6%), feeling helpless (37%),  feeling they might pass out (37%), and thinking they might die (14.6%) (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Characteristics of acute stress responses to childbirth by mode of delivery. The histogram bars represent the percentage of participants by delivery mode with endorsement of a score of 2 or higher (i.e., at least a moderate degree) on each of the 12 items of the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI), excluding item 4. Assessment obtained ∼31 h after childbirth. n = 1146.

4.2. Stability of acute stress and delivery mode

Figure 2 presents acute stress levels in response to childbirth by delivery mode assessed across time points (model fit, marginal R 2 = 0.22; conditional R 2 = 0.73). Significant fixed effects were observed for delivery mode (F(3, 661) = 12.77, p < 0.001) and for the interaction (delivery by time) (F (3, 671) = 3.47, p = 0.02). The time effect was not significant (F(1, 671) = 0.45, p = 0.50).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Level of acute stress to childbirth over time by delivery mode. The figure depicts stress levels in response to recent childbirth assessed by the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) (total score) for each delivery mode in the immediate postpartum assessment (∼29.4 h post‐delivery) time point and the second (∼1.9 months post‐delivery) assessment. n = 795.

The unscheduled CD had higher stress (PDI score) across time points in comparison to vaginal delivery (estimate = 3.84, p < 0.001) and scheduled CD (estimate = 3.94, p < 0.001) but not assisted vaginal delivery (estimate = 0.81, p = 0.83). While stress levels were stable for the unscheduled CD (estimate = 0.39, p = 0.44) and assisted vaginal delivery (estimate = 0.34, p = 0.68), the levels decreased for vaginal delivery (estimate = 0.52, p = 0.03) and increased for scheduled CD (estimate = 1.33, p = 0.01), accounting for contributing factors.

4.3. Acute stress as a risk factor for later mental health problems

Regression analyses revealed that acute stress reported immediately postpartum significantly predicted mental health and maternal–infant bonding outcomes around two months later. Accounting for obstetric factors (i.e., delivery mode, complications severity, primiparity, epidural use, and labor induction), acute stress levels predicted childbirth‐related PTSD symptoms (β = 0.48, p < 0.001, R 2‐change, ΔR 2 = 0.19), depressive symptoms (β = 0.30, p < 0.001, ΔR 2 = 0.09), and bonding difficulties (β = 0.32, p < 0.001, ΔR 2 = 0.08). When applying Holm–Bonferroni adjustment to account for multiple analyses, results remained significant (p < 0.017, Holm‐adjusted).

5. DISCUSSION

5.1. Principal findings

The reported study documents high rates of psychological stress among patients who underwent unscheduled CD, most of whom experienced non‐emergent procedures. A total of 26.6% of unscheduled CD patients reported clinically significant acute stress reactions occurring during childbirth or immediately after with higher rates related to stages of labor (29.3% in CD performed in labor) and obstetric morbidity. The risk of endorsing acute stress was approximately three times higher for patients undergoing unscheduled CD, compared to those with vaginal delivery, after accounting for factors including demographic background, primiparity, obstetric complications, labor induction, antepartum mental health status, and trauma history. Reported heightened traumatic stress among women with unscheduled CD persisted through the early postpartum months, while those who had vaginal delivery exhibited low stress levels that further declined over time. Acute stress during childbirth predicted subsequent PTSD and depressive symptoms and maternal–infant bonding problems. These findings demonstrate that unscheduled CD may signal increased vulnerability to psychological stress during childbirth and heightened stress may have enduring effects on maternal mental health. Importantly, rates of acute stress were similar between women undergoing unscheduled CD and those with assisted vaginal delivery, suggesting that underlying obstetric acuity, the need for an unanticipated intervention, or morbidity might be associated with stress responses, rather than the procedure itself.

5.2. Results in the context of what is known

There is growing recognition of childbirth as an experience that can be psychologically stressful for some individuals [57, 58, 59, 60]. Prior studies have shown that unscheduled CD is associated with an increased risk of developing PTSD symptoms [36, 61, 62, 63, 64]. Yet, there remains a limited understanding of the immediate psychological impact of unscheduled CD. This study documents significant stress reactions during childbirth in women who undergo unscheduled CD. These immediate reactions are clinically meaningful, as they may serve as early indicators of subsequent maternal posttraumatic and depressive symptoms and maternal–infant bonding problems. The pattern of clinically significant stress we observed closely mirrors immediate psychological responses reported in individuals exposed to other traumas [26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31].

5.3. Clinical implications

While the first 24 hours after childbirth is well recognized as a critical window for monitoring physical recovery [54, 65, 66, 67, 68], especially after CD [69], the psychological contribution of the mode of delivery has received limited attention in clinical practice and maternity care planning. This study demonstrates that unscheduled CD associates with heightened psychological stress reactions during this important period of maternal behavior initiation. Because peritraumatic reaction can serve as a risk factor for posttraumatic mental health conditions [25, 32, 33, 41], timely screening for acute stress responses immediately following unscheduled CD or other medically complicated deliveries with unanticipated interventions, such as cases of assisted vaginal delivery, would improve the accuracy of mental health determinations, enhance opportunities for early and effective treatment [70], and better prepare patients for future pregnancies [24, 41, 70].

Currently, US hospital screening protocols focus on maternal depression (e.g., using the EPDS) and do not assess traumatic stress. Our findings support the ACOG recommendation for more comprehensive mental health screening [71]. Importantly, our findings highlight the potential of the PDI as a brief, scalable screening tool that can be administered during maternity hospitalization stay to identify women at elevated risk for PTSD or other adverse psychological outcomes after complicated or traumatic deliveries [41]. Anticipating risk for traumatization during pregnancy may inform shared decision‐making around birth plans and delivery mode and optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes [72].

Unscheduled CD may disrupt oxytocin and cortisol surges that support labor [73, 74]. Dysregulated stress responses in combination with the threat of undergoing an unplanned major obstetric procedure and its acuity may increase susceptibility to traumatization. Acute stress reactions were higher among women who underwent unscheduled CD after labor had already started, compared to those who had unscheduled CD before labor began or scheduled CD. We also found that acute stress was associated with the degree of obstetric complications, suggesting a dose–response relationship between obstetric morbidity and acute stress. Thus, the disruption of naturally occurring maternal‐stress regulation during labor and/or the events leading to the surgery may intensify acute stress response. Our findings also point to the direction of considering the unanticipated obstetric intervention rather than merely the mode of delivery in triggering maternal distress potentially via increased sense of loss of control.

5.4. Research implications

An important direction for future research is the development of comprehensive risk assessment models that integrate obstetric factors commonly associated with unscheduled CD, such as labor induction, pain intensity, epidural use, time of birth, and maternal or neonatal complications, alongside pre‐existing psychological vulnerabilities. Given that the subjective childbirth experience plays a key role in posttraumatic maternal outcomes [75, 76], future studies are needed to investigate the role of a support person, staff support, and patient–clinician interactions in shaping trauma responses. Understanding how these interpersonal and contextual factors amplify or buffer distress will be essential for developing evidence‐based recommendations for trauma‐informed care in the wake of unanticipated obstetric interventions beyond unscheduled CD. Gaining insight into the potential for psychological growth following a traumatic childbirth as well as the processes facilitating meaning‐making may provide pathways for maternal resilience [77, 78, 79, 80]. More research is needed to understand the potential psychophysiological pathways underlying stress responses and medically complicated deliveries, including a comprehensive assessment of obstetrical factors that may amplify these responses. As heightened stress during labor can lead to sympathetic dominance that may impact uterine contractions and impede labor progress, increasing unscheduled CD risk [4, 5], examination of the bi‐directional relationship between stress and medically complicated deliveries is warranted.

5.5. Strengths and limitations

A key strength of this study is the ability to assess patients’ stress reactions to childbirth during the immediate postpartum period. We used a well‐established structured instrument to measure traumatic stress, previously validated in trauma‐exposed populations, to capture clinically significant acute reactions to childbirth. Rather than relying on a community sample, the study was performed in a clinical setting to estimate rates of stress reaction. We conducted repeated assessments to evaluate the stability of recalled stress reactions and their association with postpartum mental health. The risk of acute stress associated with unscheduled CD was compared to other delivery modes. We incorporated electronic medical record data to assess obstetric complications, labor induction, and important antepartum mental health status and prior trauma, which allowed more nuanced and adjusted analysis of unscheduled CD's link with traumatic stress.

Several limitations should be noted. The study design does not permit causality or the separation of the contribution of stressful or acute events leading to unscheduled CD from the contribution of the procedure itself to acute stress responses. While we accounted for obstetric complications, it is not possible to know whether it is the unscheduled CD, the indication for the unscheduled CD, or the unexpected nature of having a serious medical procedure that is associated with increased acute stress responses compared to vaginal delivery. There could have been differences between the two reported cohorts on other background factors beyond those reported, as well as differences in obstetric practice. Women experiencing severe stress were potentially less likely to be approached and, therefore maybe less represented in the study sample. We did not include biological measures of acute stress (e.g., heart rate variability), which could have provided mechanistic insights. Finally, although the obstetric characteristics of participants who completed both assessments were generally representative of the original cohort, there were differences between completers and non‐completers on some demographic characteristics. As a significant proportion of study participants were lost to follow‐up, potentially due to assessments performed during the demanding first postpartum months, monetary incentives, and remote engagement, this should be taken into account in findings’ interpretation. Cultural or sociodemographic differences may limit the generalizability of our findings to other populations or healthcare systems.

6. CONCLUSIONS

Unscheduled CD can be lifesaving for both mother and fetus. Our findings provide evidence for an associated increased risk of psychological traumatization among patients who undergo unscheduled CD, with consequences for maternal mental health. Given that trauma exposure and stress can lead to profound neurobiological changes [79, 80, 81], and heighten vulnerability to re‐traumatization with subsequent traumatic events [33, 82, 83], there is a need to prioritize birth trauma prevention in perinatal care after obstetrical acuity, especially those entailing unanticipated interventions. Patient and provider education is an essential first step that should facilitate implementation of trauma‐informed screening, early intervention strategies, and systemic policy reforms.

6.1. Declaration of generative AI and AI‐assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT‐4o in order to improve language and readability and reduce word count. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Andrea G. Edlow reports consulting fees from Mirvie, Inc and Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, and research funding from Merck, Sharp and Dohme, all outside of this work. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting Information

PMF2-2-e70220-s001.docx (27.4KB, docx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Gabriella Dishy for building the first Redcap survey and Sabrina Chan for assisting in data cleaning. S.D. was supported by grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD108619, R21HD100817, and R21HD109546). H.A.K. is a recipient of a fellowship grant from the American Physicians Fellowship for Medicine in Israel.

The study was presented at the 2025 New England Science Symposium (Poster Presentation) and the 2025 MGB AMC Public and Community Psychiatry Symposium (Poster Presentation).

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ouzounian, J. G. and Elkayam U.. 2012. “Physiologic Changes During Normal Pregnancy and Delivery.” Radiologic Clinics 30(3): 317–29. 10.1016/j.ccl.2012.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zuarez‐Easton, S. , Erez O., Zafran N., Carmeli J., Garmi G., and Salim R.. 2023. “Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Options for Pain Relief During Labor: An Expert Review.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 228(5S): S1246–59. 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Uvnäs‐Moberg, K. , Ekström‐Bergström A., Berg M., Buckley S., Pajalic Z., Hadjigeorgiou E., Kotlowska A., and Lengler L.. 2019. “Maternal Plasma Levels of Oxytocin During Physiological Childbirth—A Systematic Review With Implications for Uterine Contractions and Central Actions of Oxytocin.” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19(1): 285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Walter, M. H. , Abele H., and Plappert C. F.. 2021. “The Role of Oxytocin and the Effect of Stress During Childbirth: Neurobiological Basics and Implications for Mother and Child.” Front Endocrinol 12: 742236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Buckley, S. J. 2015. “Executive Summary of Hormonal Physiology of Childbearing: Evidence and Implications for Women, Babies, and Maternity Care.” Journal of Perinatal Education 24(3): 145–53. 10.1891/1058-1243.24.3.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gumusoglu, S. B. and Stelzer I. A.. 2025. “Pregnancy as an Opportunity to Explore Brain‐Immune Connections in Mental Health.” Science Advances 11: eadu8270. 10.1126/sciadv.adu8270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kim, P. 2021. “How Stress Can Influence Brain Adaptations to Motherhood.” Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 60: 100875. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2020.100875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Witteveen, A. B. , Stramrood C. A. I., Henrichs J., Flanagan J. C., van Pampus M. G., and Olff M.. 2020. “The Oxytocinergic System in PTSD Following Traumatic Childbirth: Endogenous and Exogenous Oxytocin in the Peripartum Period.” Archives of Women's Mental Health 23(3): 317–29. 10.1007/s00737-019-00994-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hamilton, B. E. , Martin J. A., and Osterman M. J. K.. 2024. “Births: Provisional Data for 2023.” National Vital Statistics Rapid Release 35: 1–8. Available From: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr035.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. World Health Organization . 2014. World Health Statistics 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available From: apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112738/1/9789240692671_eng.pdf?ua=1. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Boerma, T. , Ronsmans C., Melesse D. Y., Barros A. J. D., Barros F. C., Juan L., Moller A. B., et al. 2018. “Global Epidemiology of Use of and Disparities in Cesarean Sections.” Lancet 392(10155): 1341–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine . 2020. “Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 133(2): e73–e109. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Carlson, N. S. , Carlson M. S., Erickson E. N., Higgins M., Britt A. J., and Amore A. D.. 2023. “Disparities by Race/ethnicity in Unplanned Cesarean Birth Among Healthy Nulliparas: A Secondary Analysis of the nuMoM2b Dataset.” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23(1): 342. 10.1186/s12884-023-05667-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Panda, S. , Begley C., and Daly D.. 2022. “Factors Associated With Cesarean Birth in Nulliparous Women: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.” Birth 49(1): 72–81. 10.1111/birt.12654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kissler, K. and Hurt K. J.. 2023. “The Pathophysiology of Labor Dystocia: Theme With Variations.” Reproductive Sciences 30(3): 729–42. 10.1007/s43032-022-01018-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. World Health Organization . 2018. WHO Recommendations: Non‐Clinical Interventions to Reduce Unnecessary Cesarean Sections. Geneva: World Health Organization. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Vogel, J. P. , Jung J., Lavin T., Simpson G., Kluwgant D., Abalos E., Diaz V., et al. 2024. “Neglected Medium‐Term and Long‐Term Consequences of Labour and Childbirth: A Systematic Analysis of the Burden, Recommended Practices, and a Way Forward.” Lancet Global Health 12(2): e317–e30. 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00454-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Blondel, B. , Coulm B., Bonnet C., and Goffinet F.. 2019. “Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity Associated With Cesarean Delivery and the Role of Maternal Age: A Population‐Based Propensity Score Analysis.” CMAJ 191(13): E352–E60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Pires‐Menard, A. , Flatley C., and Kumar S.. 2021. “Severe Neonatal Outcomes Associated With Emergency Cesarean Section at Term.” Journal of Maternal‐Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 34(4): 629–33. 10.1080/14767058.2019.1611770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Neu, J. and Rushing J.. 2011. “Cesarean Versus Vaginal Delivery: Long‐Term Infant Outcomes and the Hygiene Hypothesis.” Clinics in Perinatology 38(2): 321–31. 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sandall, J. , Tribe R. M., Avery L., Mola G., Visser G. H., Homer C. S., Gibbons D., et al. 2018. “Short‐Term and Long‐Term Effects of Cesarean Section on the Health of Women and Children.” Lancet 392(10155): 1349–57. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Keag, O. E. , Norman J. E., and Stock S. J.. 2018. “Long‐Term Risks and Benefits Associated With Cesarean Delivery for Mother, Baby, and Subsequent Pregnancies: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Plos Medicine 15(1): e1002494. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. DSM‐5 Task Force . 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM‐5. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Washington DC. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Dekel, S. and Hughes F.. 2025. “Understanding the Link Between Cesarean Delivery and Childbirth‐Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 232(6): e214. 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Vance, M. C. , Kovachy B., Dong M., and Bui E.. 2018. “Peritraumatic Distress: A Review and Synthesis of 15 Years of Research.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 74(9): 1457–84. 10.1002/jclp.22612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Thomas, É. , Saumier D., and Brunet A.. 2012. “Peritraumatic Distress and the Course of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Meta‐Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 57: 122–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nishi, D. , Matsuoka Y., Yonemoto N., Noguchi H., Kim Y., and Kanba S.. 2010. “Peritraumatic Distress Inventory as a Predictor of Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder After a Severe Motor Vehicle Accident.” Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 64(2): 149–56. 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ennis, N. , Anton M., and Bravoco O., et al. 2021. “Prediction of Posttraumatic Stress and Depression One‐Month Post‐Injury: A Comparison of Two Screening Instruments.” Health Psychology 40(10): 702–5. 10.1037/hea0001114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bunnell, B. E. , Davidson T. M., and Ruggiero K. J.. 2018. “The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory: Factor Structure and Predictive Validity in Traumatically Injured Patients Admitted Through a Level I Trauma Center.” Journal of Anxiety Disorders 55: 8–13. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Guardia, D. , Brunet A., Duhamel A., Ducrocq F., Demarty A. L., and Vaiva G.. 2013. “Prediction of Trauma‐Related Disorders: A Proposed Cutoff Score for the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory.” Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 15(1): PCC.12l01406. 10.4088/PCC.12l01406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Brunet, A. , Weiss D. S., Metzler T. J., Best S. R., Neylan T. C., Rogers C., Fagan J., et al. 2001. “The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory: A Proposed Measure of PTSD Criterion A2.” American Journal of Psychiatry 158(9): 1480–5. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ozer, E. J. , Best S. R., Lipsey T. L., and Weiss D. S.. 2003. “Predictors of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Symptoms in Adults: A Meta‐Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 129(1): 52–73. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Dekel, S. , Gilberston M., Orr S., Rauch S., Nellie W., and Pittman R.. 2016. “Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder”. In T. A Stern, M. Fava, T. Wilens, J.F. Rosenbaum (EDs.): Mass General Hosp Compreh Clin Psych 2nd Ed. 380–94. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Antičević, V. , Bubić A., and Britvić D.. 2021. “Peritraumatic Distress and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: The Contributions of Psychosocial Factors and Pandemic‐Related Stressors.” Journal of Traumatic Stress 34(4): 691–700. 10.1002/jts.22701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Breh, D. C. and Seidler G. H.. 2007. “Is Peritraumatic Dissociation a Risk Factor for PTSD?.” Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 8(1): 53–69. 10.1300/J229v08n01_04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Thiel, F. and Dekel S.. 2020. “Peritraumatic Dissociation in Childbirth‐Evoked Posttraumatic Stress and Postpartum Mental Health.” Archives of Women's Mental Health 23(2): 189–97. 10.1007/s00737-019-00978-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chan, B. S. S. J. , Thiel F., Kaimal A. J., Pitman R. K., Orr S. P., and Dekel S.. 2022. “Validation of Childbirth‐Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Psychophysiological Assessment.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 227: 656–9. 10.1016/j.ajog. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Carmassi, C. , Bui E., Bertelloni C. A., Dell'Oste V., Pedrinelli V., Corsi M., Baldanzi S., et al. 2021. “Validation of the Italian Version of the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory: Validity, Reliability and Factor Analysis in a Sample of Healthcare Workers.” European Journal of Psychotraumatology 12(1): 1879552. 10.1080/20008198.2021.1879552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Mayopoulos, G. A. , Ein‐Dor T., Dishy G. A., Nandru R., Chan S. J., Hanley L. E., Kaimal A. J., et al. 2021. “COVID‐19 Is Associated With Traumatic Childbirth and Subsequent Mother‐Infant Bonding Problems.” Journal of Affective Disorders 282: 122–5. 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Rybojad, B. , Aftyka A., and Milanowska J.. 2019. “Peritraumatic Distress Among Emergency Medical System Employees: A Proposed Cut‐Off for the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory.” Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 26(4): 579–84. 10.26444/aaem/105436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Jagodnik, K. M. , Ein‐Dor T., Chan S. J., et al. 2024. “Screening for Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder Following Childbirth Using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory.” Journal of Affective Disorders 348: 17–25. 10.1016/j.jad.2023.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Cox, J. L. , Holden J. M., and Sagovsky R.. 1987. “Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10‐Item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.” British Journal of Psychiatry 150: 782–6. 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. 2023. “Screening and Diagnosis of Mental Health Conditions During Pregnancy and Postpartum: ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 4.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 141(6): 1232–61. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Levis, B. , Negeri Z., Sun Y., Benedetti A., and Thombs B. D.; DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) EPDS Group . 2020. “Accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for Screening to Detect Major Depression Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Individual Participant Data.” BMJ 371: m4022. 10.1136/bmj.m4022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Gibson, J. , McKenzie‐McHarg K., Shakespeare J., Price J., and Gray R.. 2009. “A Systematic Review of Studies Validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Antepartum and Postpartum Women.” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 119(5): 350–64. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01363.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Weathers, F. W. , Litz B. T., Keane T. M., Palmieri P. A., Marx B. P., and Schnurr P. P.. 2013. The PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5). National Center for PTSD. Available From: https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/adult-sr/ptsd-checklist.asp. [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Blevins, C. A. , Weathers F. W., Davis M. T., Witte T. K., and Domino J. L.. 2015. “The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation.” Journal of Traumatic Stress 28(6): 489–8. 10.1002/jts.22059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Bovin, M. J. , Marx B. P., Weathers F. W., Gallagher M. W., Rodriguez P., Schnurr P. P., and Keane T. M.. 2016. “Psychometric Properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders‐Fifth Edition (PCL‐5) in Veterans.” Psychological Assessment 28(11): 1379–91. 10.1037/pas0000254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Arora, I. H. , Woscoboinik G. G., Mokhtar S., Quagliarini B., Bartal A., Jagodnik K. M., Barry R. L., et al. 2024. “A Diagnostic Questionnaire for Childbirth Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Validation Study.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 231(1): 134.e1–e13. 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Gelaye, B. , Zheng Y., Medina‐Mora M. E., Rondon M. B., Sánchez S. E., and Williams M. A.. 2017. “Validity of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorders (PTSD) Checklist in Pregnant Women.” BMC Psychiatry 17(1): 179. 10.1186/s12888-017-1304-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Forkus, S. R. , Raudales A. M., Rafiuddin H. S., Weiss N. H., Messman B. A., and Contractor A. A.. 2023. “The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM‐5: A Systematic Review of Existing Psychometric Evidence.” Clinical Psychology 30(1): 110–21. 10.1037/cps0000111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Müller, M. E. 1994. “A Questionnaire to Measure Mother‐to‐Infant Attachment.” Journal of Nursing Measurement 2: 129–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Weathers, F. W. , Blake D. D., Schnurr P. P., Kaloupek D. G., Marx B. P., and Keane T. M.. 2013. Life Events Checklist for DSM‐5 (LEC‐5). Instrument Available From the National Center for PTSD. Available From: https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/te-measures/life_events_checklist.asp. [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Kilpatrick, S. K. , J. L. Ecker, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine . 2016. “Severe Maternal Morbidity: Screening and Review.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 215(3): B17–22. 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. van Buuren, S. and Groothuis‐Oudshoorn K.. 2011. “mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R.” Journal of Statistical Software 45(3): 1–67. 10.18637/jss.v045.i03. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. R Core Team . 2024. The R Reference Manual: Base Package. Version 4.4.0. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available From: www.cran.r‐project.org/doc/manuals/r‐release/fullrefman.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Hollander, M. H. , van Hastenberg E., van Dillen J., van Pampus M. G., de Miranda E., and Stramrood C. A. I.. 2017. “Preventing Traumatic Childbirth Experiences: 2192 Women's Perceptions and Views.” Archives of Women's Mental Health 20(4): 515–23. 10.1007/s00737-017-0729-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Ayers, S. 2004. “Delivery as a Traumatic Event: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Treatment for Postnatal Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 47(3): 552–67. 10.1097/01.grf.0000129919.00756.9c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Dekel, S. , Stuebe C., and Dishy G.. 2017. “Childbirth Induced Posttraumatic Stress Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Risk Factors.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 560. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Grekin, R. and O'Hara M. W.. 2014. “Prevalence and Risk Factors of Postpartum Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Meta‐Analysis.” Clinical Psychology Review 34(5): 389–401. 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Hüner, B. , Friedl T., Schütze S., Polasik A., Janni W., and Reister F.. 2024. “Post‐Traumatic Stress Syndromes Following Childbirth Influenced by Birth Mode—Is an Emergency Cesarean Section Worst?.” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 309(6): 2439–46. 10.1007/s00404-023-07114-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Froeliger, A. , Deneux‐Tharaux C., Loussert L., Bouchghoul H., Laure Sutter‐Dallay A., Madar H., Sentilhes L., et al. 2025. “Prevalence and Risk Factors for Postpartum Depression 2 Months After Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Multicenter Study.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 232(5): 491. 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Chan, S. J. , Ein‐Dor T., Mayopoulos P. A., Mesa M. M., Sunda R. M., McCarthy B. F., Kaimal A. J., et al. 2020. “Risk Factors for Developing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Following Childbirth.” Psychiatry Research 290: 113090. 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Dekel, S. , Ein‐Dor T., Dishy G. A., and Mayopoulos P. A.. 2020. “Beyond Postpartum Depression: Posttraumatic Stress‐Depressive Response Following Childbirth.” Archives of Women's Mental Health 23(4): 557–64. 10.1007/s00737-019-01006-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Dol, J. , Hughes B., Bonet M., Dorey R., Dorling J., Grant A., Langlois E. V., et al. 2022. “Timing of Maternal Mortality and Severe Morbidity During the Postpartum Period: A Systematic Review.” JBI Evidence Synthesis 20(9): 2119–4. 10.11124/JBIES-20-00578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Ahmed, I. , Ali S. M., Amenga‐Etego S., Ariff S., Bahl R., Baqui A. H., Begum N., et al. 2018. “Population‐Based Rates, Timing, and Causes of Maternal Deaths, Stillbirths, and Neonatal Deaths in South Asia and Sub‐Saharan Africa: A Multi‐Country Prospective Cohort Study.” Lancet Global Health 6(12): e1297–e308. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30385-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Li, X. F. , Fortneyb J. A., Kotelchuck M., and Gloverb L. H.. 1996. “The Postpartum Period: The Key to Maternal Mortality.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 54: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. World Health Organization . 2022. WHO Recommendations on Maternal and Newborn Care for a Positive Postnatal Experience. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available From: www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240045989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Patel, K. , and Zakowski M.. 2021. “Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean: Current and Emerging Trends.” Current Anesthesiology Reports 11(2): 136–44. 10.1007/s40140-021-00442-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Dekel, S. , Papadakis J. E., Quagliarini B., Pham C. T., Pacheco‐Barrios K., Hughes F., Jagodnik K. M., et al. “Preventing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Following Childbirth: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 230(6): 610–61. 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. 2021. “Caring for Patients Who Have Experienced Trauma: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 825.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 137(4): e94–9. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Simpson, M. , Schmied V., Dickson C., and Dahlen H. G.. 2018. “Postnatal Post‐Traumatic Stress: An Integrative Review.” Women Birth 31(5): 367–79. 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Nurdin, O. S. , Wantania J. E., and Mewengkang R. A. A.. 2022. “Association Between Serum Cortisol Levels and Anxiety Levels in Elective and Emergency Cesarean Section.” Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 10(4). 10.32771/inajog.v10i4.1624. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Shishido, E. and Horiuchi S.. 2023. “Oxytocin Changes in Women With Emergency Cesarean Section: Association With Maternal Blues by Delivery Mode.” Heliyon 9(4): e15405. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Bartal, A. , Jagodnik K. M., Chan S. J., Babu M. S., and Dekel S.. 2023. “Identifying Women With Postdelivery Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Natural Language Processing of Personal Childbirth Narratives.” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 5(3): 100834. 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Bartal, A. , Jagodnik K. M., Chan S. J., and Dekel S.. 2024. “AI and Narrative Embeddings Detect PTSD Following Childbirth via Birth Stories.” Scientific Reports 14(1): 8336. 10.1038/s41598-024-54242-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Berman, Z. , Thiel F., Dishy G. A., Chan S. J., and Dekel S.. 2021. “Maternal Psychological Growth Following Childbirth.” Archives of Women's Mental Health 24(2): 313–20. 10.1007/s00737-020-01053-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Babu, M. S. , Chan S. J., Ein‐Dor T., and Dekel S.. 2022. “Traumatic Childbirth During COVID‐19 Triggers Maternal Psychological Growth and in Turn Better Mother‐Infant Bonding.” Journal of Affective Disorders 313: 163–6. 10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Bremner, J. D. 2006. “Traumatic Stress: Effects on the Brain.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 8(4): 445–61. 10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.4/jbremner. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Lanius, R. , and Olff M.. 2017. “The Neurobiology of PTSD.” European Journal of Psychotraumatology 8(1): 1314165. 10.1080/20008198.2017.1314165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Sherin, J. E. and Nemeroff C. B.. 2011. “Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder: The Neurobiological Impact of Psychological Trauma.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 13(3): 263–78. 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.2/jsherin. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Berman, Z. , Thiel F., Kaimal A. J., and Dekel S.. 2021. “Association of Sexual Assault History With Traumatic Childbirth and Subsequent PTSD.” Archives of Women's Mental Health 24(5): 767–71. 10.1007/s00737-021-01129-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Breslau, N. , Chilcoat H. D., Kessler R. C., and Davis G. C.. 1999. “Previous Exposure to Trauma and PTSD Effects of Subsequent Trauma: Results From the Detroit Area Survey of Trauma.” American Journal of Psychiatry 156(6): 902–7. 10.1176/ajp.156.6.902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

PMF2-2-e70220-s001.docx (27.4KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.j.) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES