Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1995 Mar;68(3):866–875. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80263-8

Dimensions of the narrow portion of a recombinant NMDA receptor channel.

A Villarroel 1, N Burnashev 1, B Sakmann 1
PMCID: PMC1281811  PMID: 7538803

Abstract

Glutamate-activated single-channel and ensemble currents were recorded from Xenopus laevis oocytes and HEK 293 cells expressing a recombinant NMDA receptor, assembled from NR1 and NR2A subunits. Cesium was the main charge carrier, and organic cations were used to determine the presence of vestibules of this channel and to estimate its pore diameter. The large organic cations tris-(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane (Tris), N-methyl-glucamine (NMG), arginine (NMG), arginine (Arg), choline, and tetramethylammonium (TMA), when added in millimolar concentrations to the extracellular or cytoplasmic side, produced a voltage-dependent blockade of single-channel Cs+ currents. These molecules behaved as impermeant ions that only partially traverse the channel from either side. The smaller cations trimethylammonium (TriMA) and dimethylammonium (DMA) produced a small and nearly voltage-independent reduction in current amplitude, suggesting that they are permeant. In biionic experiments with Cs+ as the reference ion, the large blocking cations NMG, Arg, Tris, TMA, choline, hexamethonium (Hme), triethylammonium (TriEA), and tetraethylammonium (TEA) showed no measurable permeability. TriMA and smaller ammonium derivatives were permeant. Both the permeability and single-channel conductance of organic cations, relative to Cs+, decreased as the ion size increased. The results suggest that the NMDA receptor has extracellular and cytoplasmic mouths that can accommodate large cations up to 7.3 A in mean diameter. The narrow portion of the pore is estimated to have a mean diameter of 5.5 A.

Full text

PDF
866

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ascher P., Nowak L. The role of divalent cations in the N-methyl-D-aspartate responses of mouse central neurones in culture. J Physiol. 1988 May;399:247–266. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Betz H. Homology and analogy in transmembrane channel design: lessons from synaptic membrane proteins. Biochemistry. 1990 Apr 17;29(15):3591–3599. doi: 10.1021/bi00467a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bormann J., Hamill O. P., Sakmann B. Mechanism of anion permeation through channels gated by glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acid in mouse cultured spinal neurones. J Physiol. 1987 Apr;385:243–286. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burnashev N., Schoepfer R., Monyer H., Ruppersberg J. P., Günther W., Seeburg P. H., Sakmann B. Control by asparagine residues of calcium permeability and magnesium blockade in the NMDA receptor. Science. 1992 Sep 4;257(5075):1415–1419. doi: 10.1126/science.1382314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen C., Okayama H. High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Aug;7(8):2745–2752. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.8.2745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coronado R., Miller C. Conduction and block by organic cations in a K+-selective channel from sarcoplasmic reticulum incorporated into planar phospholipid bilayers. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Apr;79(4):529–547. doi: 10.1085/jgp.79.4.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cull-Candy S. G., Howe J. R., Ogden D. C. Noise and single channels activated by excitatory amino acids in rat cerebellar granule neurones. J Physiol. 1988 Jun;400:189–222. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cull-Candy S. G., Usowicz M. M. Multiple-conductance channels activated by excitatory amino acids in cerebellar neurons. Nature. 1987 Feb 5;325(6104):525–528. doi: 10.1038/325525a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang L. Y., Catterall W. A., Ehrenstein G. Selectivity of cations and nonelectrolytes for acetylcholine-activated channels in cultured muscle cells. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Apr;71(4):397–410. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.4.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Iino M., Ozawa S., Tsuzuki K. Permeation of calcium through excitatory amino acid receptor channels in cultured rat hippocampal neurones. J Physiol. 1990 May;424:151–165. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ishii T., Moriyoshi K., Sugihara H., Sakurada K., Kadotani H., Yokoi M., Akazawa C., Shigemoto R., Mizuno N., Masu M. Molecular characterization of the family of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits. J Biol Chem. 1993 Feb 5;268(4):2836–2843. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jahr C. E., Stevens C. F. Glutamate activates multiple single channel conductances in hippocampal neurons. Nature. 1987 Feb 5;325(6104):522–525. doi: 10.1038/325522a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewis C. A. Ion-concentration dependence of the reversal potential and the single channel conductance of ion channels at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:417–445. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mayer M. L., Westbrook G. L. Mixed-agonist action of excitatory amino acids on mouse spinal cord neurones under voltage clamp. J Physiol. 1984 Sep;354:29–53. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McCleskey E. W., Almers W. The Ca channel in skeletal muscle is a large pore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):7149–7153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.7149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Methfessel C., Witzemann V., Takahashi T., Mishina M., Numa S., Sakmann B. Patch clamp measurements on Xenopus laevis oocytes: currents through endogenous channels and implanted acetylcholine receptor and sodium channels. Pflugers Arch. 1986 Dec;407(6):577–588. doi: 10.1007/BF00582635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller C. Bis-quaternary ammonium blockers as structural probes of the sarcoplasmic reticulum K+ channel. J Gen Physiol. 1982 May;79(5):869–891. doi: 10.1085/jgp.79.5.869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Monyer H., Burnashev N., Laurie D. J., Sakmann B., Seeburg P. H. Developmental and regional expression in the rat brain and functional properties of four NMDA receptors. Neuron. 1994 Mar;12(3):529–540. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90210-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Monyer H., Sprengel R., Schoepfer R., Herb A., Higuchi M., Lomeli H., Burnashev N., Sakmann B., Seeburg P. H. Heteromeric NMDA receptors: molecular and functional distinction of subtypes. Science. 1992 May 22;256(5060):1217–1221. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5060.1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mori H., Masaki H., Yamakura T., Mishina M. Identification by mutagenesis of a Mg(2+)-block site of the NMDA receptor channel. Nature. 1992 Aug 20;358(6388):673–675. doi: 10.1038/358673a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Moriyoshi K., Masu M., Ishii T., Shigemoto R., Mizuno N., Nakanishi S. Molecular cloning and characterization of the rat NMDA receptor. Nature. 1991 Nov 7;354(6348):31–37. doi: 10.1038/354031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sanchez J. A., Dani J. A., Siemen D., Hille B. Slow permeation of organic cations in acetylcholine receptor channels. J Gen Physiol. 1986 Jun;87(6):985–1001. doi: 10.1085/jgp.87.6.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sommer B., Keinänen K., Verdoorn T. A., Wisden W., Burnashev N., Herb A., Köhler M., Takagi T., Sakmann B., Seeburg P. H. Flip and flop: a cell-specific functional switch in glutamate-operated channels of the CNS. Science. 1990 Sep 28;249(4976):1580–1585. doi: 10.1126/science.1699275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stern P., Béhé P., Schoepfer R., Colquhoun D. Single-channel conductances of NMDA receptors expressed from cloned cDNAs: comparison with native receptors. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Dec 22;250(1329):271–277. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stern P., Cik M., Colquhoun D., Stephenson F. A. Single channel properties of cloned NMDA receptors in a human cell line: comparison with results from Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol. 1994 May 1;476(3):391–397. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Unwin N. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at 9 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1993 Feb 20;229(4):1101–1124. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Unwin N. The structure of ion channels in membranes of excitable cells. Neuron. 1989 Dec;3(6):665–676. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90235-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Villarroel A., Alvarez O., Oberhauser A., Latorre R. Probing a Ca2+-activated K+ channel with quaternary ammonium ions. Pflugers Arch. 1988 Dec;413(2):118–126. doi: 10.1007/BF00582521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Villarroel A., Sakmann B. Threonine in the selectivity filter of the acetylcholine receptor channel. Biophys J. 1992 Apr;62(1):196–208. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81805-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vyklicky L., Jr, Krusek J., Edwards C. Differences in the pore sizes of the N-methyl-D-aspartate and kainate cation channels. Neurosci Lett. 1988 Jul 8;89(3):313–318. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(88)90545-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang F., Imoto K. Pore size and negative charge as structural determinants of permeability in the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Oct 22;250(1327):11–17. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Woodhull A. M. Ionic blockage of sodium channels in nerve. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Jun;61(6):687–708. doi: 10.1085/jgp.61.6.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wright J. M., Kline P. A., Nowak L. M. Multiple effects of tetraethylammonium on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-channels in mouse brain neurons in cell culture. J Physiol. 1991 Aug;439:579–604. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yakel J. L., Shao X. M., Jackson M. B. The selectivity of the channel coupled to the 5-HT3 receptor. Brain Res. 1990 Nov 12;533(1):46–52. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91793-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang J. Ion permeation through 5-hydroxytryptamine-gated channels in neuroblastoma N18 cells. J Gen Physiol. 1990 Dec;96(6):1177–1198. doi: 10.1085/jgp.96.6.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES