Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2026 Jan 20;22(1):e1012022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1012022

Retraction: Genome-wide identification of RETINOBLASTOMA RELATED 1 binding sites in Arabidopsis reveals novel DNA damage regulators

The PLOS Genetics Editors
PMCID: PMC12818592  PMID: 41557589

After this article [1] was published, the corresponding author contacted the journal to raise concerns about the integrity and reliability of the results in [1], specifically regarding image overlap in panels describing different experimental conditions in Fig 9C of [1] and Fig EV1B of [2] (withdrawn in [3]), and to request that the journal conduct a further assessment of the images in the article. PLOS noted that in Figs 7 and 9, the following panels appear to partially or fully overlap:

  • In Fig 7A:
    • The WT/MS and the +CiPt/at2g45460-1 panels.
    • The MS/flip-3 and MS/ubp21-1 panels.
    • The MS/kno1-1 and +CiPt/WT panels.
  • In Fig 9C:
    • The WT/Mock and ubp21-1/Mock - α-γH2AX panels, when levels are adjusted to visualize the background.
    • The WT/Mock and ubp21-1/Mock - α-RAD51 panels, when levels are adjusted to visualize the background.
    • The WT/Mock panels and the WT/Mock panels in Fig EV1B of [2] (withdrawn in [3]).
    • The kno1-1/Mock panels and the kno1/Mock panels in Fig EV1B of [2] (withdrawn in [3]).
    • The kno1-1/+CiPt - DAPI panel and the kno1/CiPt - DAPI panel in Fig EV1B of [2] (withdrawn in [3]).
    • The ubp21-1/+BLM panels and the WT/MMC panels in Fig EV1B of [2] (withdrawn in [3]).

The corresponding author agreed with the above image concerns and noted that the data underlying Figs 7, 8, 9C, and S10-S12 are no longer available. They also stated that they consider that the ChIP data and the article’s main conclusion remains valid, including the claim that these data could be used to identify new DNA damage regulators, and that original data are available to support the article’s other results (Figs 1-6, 9A-B, Figs S1-S9 and S13, Tables S1-S5, Appendices S1 and S2).

In light of the above unresolved concerns about Figs 7 and 9, the PLOS Genetics Editors retract this article.

DB, MH, HH, FR, CG, and AS agreed with the retraction. PC either did not respond directly or could not be reached.

References

  • 1.Bouyer D, Heese M, Chen P, Harashima H, Roudier F, Grüttner C, et al. RETRACTED: Genome-wide identification of RETINOBLASTOMA RELATED 1 binding sites in Arabidopsis reveals novel DNA damage regulators. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(11):e1007797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 2.Chen P, De Winne N, De Jaeger G, Ito M, Heese M, Schnittger A. KNO1-mediated autophagic degradation of the Bloom syndrome complex component RMI1 promotes homologous recombination. EMBO J. 2023;42(10):e111980. doi: 10.15252/embj.2022111980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 3.Chen P, De Winne N, De Jaeger G, Ito M, Heese M, Schnittger A. Withdrawal Note: KNO1-mediated autophagic degradation of the Bloom syndrome complex component RMI1 promotes homologous recombination. EMBO J. 2025;45(1):353. doi: 10.1038/s44318-025-00500-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLOS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES