Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2025 Dec 16;17:685. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67320-4

Calcium-sensitive synaptotagmin 11-lipid interaction modulates exo-endocytosis

Xuanang Wu 1,2,3,✉,#, Jingyu Yao 1,#, Jingxiao Huo 1,#, Shaoqin Hu 1, Bianbian Wang 1, Ziyang Li 1, Yingmei Pei 1, Hong Fan 1, Shuqin Zhan 1, Rong Huang 1, Xinjiang Kang 2,3,4, Cong Ma 5, Ying Lai 6, Jing Han 7, Lianying Jiao 8,, Qian Song 1,, Changhe Wang 1,2,3,, Huadong Xu 1,
PMCID: PMC12819558  PMID: 41402317

Abstract

Synaptotagmins (Syts) are the primary Ca2+-sensors for synaptic vesicle exocytosis, while most mammalian Syts are non-Ca2+-affinitive and play critical roles in neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity with unclear mechanisms. Here, we show that high-alkaline non-Ca2+-binding Syt11 exhibits higher affinity for acidic phospholipids and Ca2+-inhibited liposome-binding, thereby competing with the Ca2+-binding Syt1. Physiological levels of Ca2+ eliminate this competition by promoting Ca2+-dependent membrane insertion of Syt1 while suppressing Syt11’s binding through electrostatic shielding of the membrane surface. Site-directed mutagenesis reveals a dual-regional lipid-binding mode (a lysine-rich motif for Ca2+-independent binding and Ca2+-binding loops for Ca2+-facilitation) for Syt1, and a redundant multi-point lipid-binding interface for Syt11. Consistent with the Ca2+-dependent competition, Syt11 inhibits both the early stages of exocytosis and endocytosis in neurons, while the maximal rate of exocytosis remains intact. This Ca2+-sensitivity of Syt11 proposes Syt1-Syt11 inter-switching in membrane-occupancy as a critical step precisely controlling exocytosis and endocytosis during synaptic transmission.

Subject terms: Exocytosis, Membrane trafficking, Membrane proteins, Molecular modelling


Syt1 is a primary Ca2+ sensor for secretion but the function of non-Ca2+ -affinitive Syt11 remains unknown. Here, authors identify strong but Ca2+ -inhibited lipid affinity of Syt11, and a Syt11-1-11 inter-switch during excitation-coupled exo-endocytosis.

Introduction

Ca2+ is the key messenger triggering neural transmission, yet how Ca2+ signals are faithfully translated into transmission events is not fully understood. Synaptotagmins (Syts) are the primary Ca2+ sensors responsible for triggering synaptic vesicle exocytosis by forming fusion machinery with the soluble N-ethylmaleimidesensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex. However, the molecular architecture and assembly mechanisms of this fusion machinery remain largely unknown1. Mammalian Syts constitute a large gene family with 17 members (Syt 1–17), each sharing a conserved structural framework: (1) a luminal (or extracellular) domain; (2) a single-helix transmembrane domain (TMD, or membrane-anchoring sites in Syt 17); (3) a juxtamembrane linker; and (4 and 5) two tandem C2 domains (C2A and C2B). These C2 domains bind 2–4 Ca2+ ions each through aspartate residues (DCa) in their loop regions. Notably, only 8 of them (Syt 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10) are canonical Ca2+-affinitive Syts (Ca☑-Syts), while the remaining 9 isoforms are non-Ca2+-affinitive (Ca⌧-Syts) due to evolutionary mutations in these key aspartate or related residues, e.g., the aspartate-to-serine substitutions in the C2A domains of Syt4 and Syt112. Despite their lack of Ca2+-affinity, several Ca⌧-Syts are abundantly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and have been implicated in neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders, e.g., Syt11 has been defined as a risk factor mediating the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and schizophrenia36. However, whether and how these Ca⌧-Syts directly participate in vesicular exocytosis remain unclear.

Ca☑-Syts, despite their distinct binding affinities, serve as the primary Ca2+ sensors initiating vesicular exocytosis and synaptic transmission79. They play critical roles in vesicle docking, priming, and fusion pore dynamics during exocytosis1013, as well as the coupling of endocytosis to exocytosis during synaptic transmission. Our previous work has depicted a bidirectional regulatory role of Syt1 in promoting clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) but inhibiting activity-dependent bulk endocytosis during sustained synaptic activity14. Meanwhile, Syt3 has been reported to localize post-synaptically to drive the off-membrane trafficking of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) through Ca2+-dependent endocytosis15. In contrast, Ca⌧-Syts have been shown to function opposite to Ca☑-Syts. Ca⌧-Syt4 has been shown to inhibit exocytosis and endocytosis1618. We have also demonstrated that Syt11 exerts inhibitory effects on both CME and bulk endocytosis in dorsal root ganglion, hippocampal, and midbrain dopaminergic neurons4,19. However, the molecular basis and mechanisms underlying the inhibitory roles of Ca⌧-Syts remain poorly understood. Furthermore, whether and how Ca☑-Syts and Ca⌧-Syts cooperate to regulate exocytosis and endocytosis during synaptic transmission remain virtually unknown.

The molecular mechanism by which Syt proteins regulate exocytosis and endocytosis remains a subject of debate1. In the case of Syt1, crystallographic studies have revealed its multiple distinct interaction interfaces with SNARE complex, including a conserved R-apex (residues R398/R399)20,21, which is essential for Syt1 to initiate Ca2+-dependent exocytosis. Syt1 also adopts a clamping conformation with SNARE to prevent spontaneous membrane fusion before Ca2+ influx2224. Meanwhile, the interactions of Syt1 with phospholipids and Ca2+ are equally critical for vesicle docking, fusion initiation, and pore dilation2527. Syt1 is proposed to bind acidic phosphatidylserine (PS) liposomes in a Ca2+-dependent manner2831, while a conserved K-rich motif (also known as the polybasic patch) enables Ca2+-independent binding to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2)3234. Lipid-binding enhances the Ca2+ affinity of Syt135, forming a Syt-Ca2+-lipid complex that enables a deep penetration of the Ca2+-binding loops into phospholipids bilayer and causes the deforming of the plasma membrane to facilitate fusion36,37. While some hypotheses suggest that Syt-Ca2+-lipid interactions may be more critical than Syt-SNARE interactions in exocytosis38. According to our model, the Ca2+-dependent membrane remodeling effects of Syt1 also provide a compelling explanation for its bidirectional role in endocytosis14. Therefore, elucidating the molecular basis of Syt-lipid interactions and their Ca2+-sensitivity is essential for understanding the dual roles of Syt proteins in coordinating exocytosis and endocytosis during neurotransmission.

In the present work, by using a combination of biochemical assays, in silico analyses, in vitro liposome experiments, and pHlourin imaging in primary cultured neurons, we show that the C2 domains of Ca☑-Syts exhibit distinct dynamics in Ca2+/lipid binding, define the Ca2+-sensitive binding of Ca⌧-Syts to liposomes, and propose a Ca2+-dependent Ca☑-Syt/Ca⌧-Syt inter-switch working model for the excitation-coupled exocytosis and endocytosis during synaptic transmission.

Results

Non-Ca2+-affinitive Syts display higher alkaline surfaces

The structures of all 34 rat Syt-C2 domains predicted by AlphaFold39,40 were used to estimate their lipid-binding potential. We found that the C2 domains of Ca☑-Syts shared a common characteristic of highly basic surfaces, e.g., the lysine (K)-rich motifs in the C2B domains of Syt1 and Syt7, which is critical for establishing strong electrostatic interactions, thereby conferring high affinity for the acidic surface of the plasma membrane. Based on the full-length amino acid sequence similarity of Syts, the Ca⌧-Syts 12 ~ 17 were distinguished from Ca☑-Syts, while the Ca⌧-Syts 4, 8, and 11 clustered with Ca☑-Syts 1, 2, 5, and 7 (Fig. 1a), indicating that not all Ca⌧-Syts are evolved independently with Ca☑-Syts. Thus, Syts 4, 8, and 11 are likely to exhibit greater molecular and functional consistencies rather than differentials with Ca☑-Syts, except for Ca2+-affinity. Although the C2A domains of Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts showed diverse isoelectric points (pIs), most C2B domains had a higher pI (> 8.5), suggesting that the C2B domains of Ca⌧-Syts also exhibit highly alkaline, positively-charged surfaces (Fig. 1b). Consistent with this, the electrostatic potential mapping of C2 domains revealed that most C2B domains of both Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts harbored a large region of high alkalinity (Fig. 1c, red region), centered around the K-rich motif. In contrast, such alkaline region was absent in the C2A domains.

Fig. 1. Non-Ca2+-affinitive Syts exhibit high alkalinity.

Fig. 1

a Phylogenetic tree of amino acid sequence similarities among all human and rat Syts, showing Ca⌧-Syts 4, 8, and 11 are clustered within Ca☑-Syts. Ca☑-Syts: gray; Ca⌧-Syts: red; x-axis: the distance values represent the number of substitutions as a proportion of the alignment length (excluding gaps), thereby indicating the extent of genetic change. b Calculated pIs of all rat Syt-C2 domains, highlighting the high pI of most C2B domains. c AlphaFold-predicted structures of all rat C2 domains, illustrating surface electrostatic potential. Top left: Syt11-C2 domains aligned with a Ca2+-bound Syt1 crystal structure (PDB: 5CCH); top right: Ca☑-Syt C2 domains with positive (red) and negative (blue) electrostatic potentials; bottom: Ca⌧-Syt C2 domains showing extensive alkaline surfaces. d Electrostatic potential profiles of Ca☑- and Ca⌧-C2 domains plotted from N- to C-terminus, showing regional similarity and difference in alkalinity. e Averaged electrostatic potential of residues across all C2 domains (Number of residues is indicated by N). f Calculated solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) of highly basic regions (potential > 75 mV) for all C2 domains, demonstrating higher alkalinity of Ca⌧-Syts (Number of Syt isoforms is indicated by N). Data are presented as the mean ± 90% CI for (d); Box-and-whisker for (e, f): the median represented by the central line inside each box, the 25th and 75th percentiles represented by the edges of the box, and the whiskers extending to the most extreme data points; two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, ***P < 0.001, n.s. no significant difference. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

The electrostatic profiles of Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syt C2 domains were largely similar when analyzed from the N- to C-terminus, except for a short fragment around residue-25 in the C2B domains where Ca☑-Syts exhibited a negative and Ca⌧-Syts displayed a positive potential (Fig. 1d). Most C2A domains in both Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts showed a negative electrostatic potential, though this potential was higher in Ca⌧-Syts compared to Ca☑-Syts. In contrast, the C2B domains had a positive potential, which was also higher in Ca⌧-Syts (Fig. 1e). To further quantify these differences, we then analyzed the solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) of highly basic regions (defined as atoms with an electrostatic potential > 75 mV). Most C2A domains had a smaller basic SASA than C2B domains, which was higher in Ca⌧-C2s than that in Ca☑-C2s in average (Fig. 1f). Collectively, these findings indicate a high potential of Ca⌧-Syts for lipid interactions, which is even stronger than that of Ca☑-Syts.

Syt11 binds acidic phospholipids with Ca2+-sensitivity

To investigate the phospholipid binding capabilities of Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts, we purified Syt1 (a representative Ca☑-Syt) and Syt11 (a representative Ca⌧-Syt) for the in vitro co-liposome precipitation (co-LP) analysis (Fig. 2a). The TMD and most of the juxtamembrane linker region were removed from both proteins to minimize their interference. We used two distinct lipid compositions: (1) the tubulation assay (TA) lipids, which contain a higher concentration of acidic phospholipids (45% PS + 5% PIP2), as used in our previous research14; and (2) the brain extract total (BET) lipids, which contain a lower concentration of acidic phospholipids (~10.6% PS + 1% PIP2). As a Ca2+ sensor, Syt1 exhibited a clear Ca2+-enhancement in binding to BET liposomes. However, when TA lipids were used, Ca2+ did not enhance the binding (Fig. 2b), suggesting that the interaction is predominantly electrostatic in nature and that the higher negative charge density of the TA membrane compensates for the Ca2+-promotion effect on Syt-lipid interactions. In contrast, Syt11, as a Ca⌧-Syt, bound to both TA and BET liposomes in the absence of Ca2+, and this binding was suppressed by increasing Ca2+ concentrations. The inhibitory effect became apparent at 0.1 mM Ca2+ and a complete blockage occurred at ~5 mM Ca2+. This Ca2+-dependent inhibition was not due to changes in protein stability or ionic strength, as Ca2+ did not alter Syt11’s behavior in the absence of liposomes, and higher concentrations of KCl (up to 100 mM) did not affect the binding as CaCl2 did (Fig. 2c). These findings validate the Ca2+-sensitive nature (facilitation vs inhibition) of Syt1/11–lipid interactions, most probably mediated by direct electrostatic forces.

Fig. 2. Ca2+ inhibits Syt11-acidic membrane interaction and blocks its competition with Syt1.

Fig. 2

a Schematic of the co-LP assay. b Soluble tandem C2A-C2B domain of Syt1 binds to liposomes, with significant Ca2+-promotion effect dependent on acidic phospholipid levels (n = 3 independent biological replicates). c Syt11-liposome binding is suppressed at high-Ca2+ concentrations. The “Lipo (-)” condition, which contains the protein in solution in the absence of liposomes, is used as a negative control, and the results from other groups are quantified and presented as a percentage relative to this control condition (left: n = 5 independent biological replicates; right: n = 3 independent biological replicates). d Ca2+-inhibition persists in Ca⌧-Syts (Syt4 and Ca-deficient Syt1 mutants, n = 3 independent biological replicates) but is absent in the Ca2+-affinity-restored Syt11-S247D mutant (n = 4 independent biological replicates). e Syt11 (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 μg) competes with Syt1 (5 μg) for liposome-binding in Ca2+-free conditions but not in 2 mM Ca2+ (n = 3 independent biological replicates). GST-Syt1 (amino acids 96-421) was used to distinguish the protein bands of Syt1 and Syt11. f To eliminate the potential influence of GST dimerization on the competition experiments, tag-free Syt1 (96-421) was generated from Thrombin digestion (n = 3 independent biological replicates). g The Syt11-S247D mutant partially regains competitive ability in the presence of Ca2+ (n = 3 independent biological repeats). h 20 μM Ca2+ abolishes competitive effects (n = 6), suggesting physiological relevance. Data are presented as the mean ± s.e.m.; two-tailed paired Student’s t test for two-group comparison (bh), one-way ANOVA for multi-group comparison (ch), and two-way ANOVA for multi-group comparison (eg). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s. no significant difference. TA tubulation assay, BET brain extract total. Source data and full scan gels are provided as a Source Data file.

An intermediate lipid composition (40% PS + 1.5% PIP2) was used in subsequent experiments to compensate the charge effect. Various lipid compositions have been used to study Syt–lipid interactions in vitro over the past 30 years. For instance, the TA lipids, which contain higher levels of PIP2, can attenuate the Ca2+-promotion effect of Syt1–lipid binding (Fig. 2b). In contrast, BET lipids, sourced from Avanti as whole brain lipids from porcine brains, contain ~10.6% PS but lack the specific presentation of the synaptic active zone (AZ). Meanwhile, human brain PS levels vary between 11.4 and 20.5%, depending on individual differences and brain regions41; and PIP2 in whole-cell lipids accounts for ~1%42,43. On the other hand, since both PS and PIP2 are predominantly located in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, their concentrations can reach 22.8-41% and ~2%, respectively. Furthermore, PIP2 is enriched in clusters at AZs, with local concentrations reaching up to ~5%4446 or even higher47. Therefore, to maintain the potential Ca2+-promoting effects, the lipid composition of 40% PS and 1.5% PIP2 are used to approximate physiological relevance.

To explore the molecular basis for the Ca2+-sensitivity of Syt-lipid interactions, the evolutionarily-substituted serine residue in the C2A domain of Syt11 was mutated back to aspartate (Syt11-S247D) to restore Ca2+-binding ability. Interestingly, Ca2+ failed to inhibit the liposome binding of the Syt11-S247D mutant, suggesting that the Ca2+-neutralized loop region facilitates lipid binding. Meanwhile, Ca2+ did not show promotion either, likely because the C2B domain of this mutant remains Ca2+-insensitive. On the contrary, the Syt1-D2N (D230/232/363/365 to asparagine) and D2E (D230/232/363/365 to glutamic acid) mutants, in which DCa residues in the C2AB were mutated to abolish Ca2+-affinity, replicated the Ca2+-inhibition in lipid binding like that observed in Ca⌧-Syts. Consistently, the Ca⌧-Syt4 also exhibited Ca2+-suppressed lipid-binding (Fig. 2d). Collectively, these results validate a conserved Ca2+-inhibition mechanism in the binding of Ca⌧-Syts to acidic phospholipids, and propose both facilitatory and inhibitory roles of Ca2+ in modulating Syt-lipid interactions.

The Ca2+-sensitive Syt1/11 competition for lipid binding

Given the opposing effects of Ca2+ on lipid-binding properties of Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts, we next tested whether these proteins compete for lipid binding. Notably, we observed a dose-dependent competition between Syt1 and Syt11 for lipid binding in the absence of Ca2+. However, this competitive effect was abolished under 2 mM Ca2+ conditions, and Syt11 was mostly removed from liposomes by Ca2+ (Fig. 2e, f). This outcome indicates a dual effect of Ca2+ on Syt1 (facilitation) and Syt11 (inhibition). In contrast, the Syt11-S247D mutant restored the competition with Syt1 in liposome-binding to some extent in 2 mM Ca2+ conditions. This might be due to the Ca2+-facilitation of lipid-binding of the S247D mutant, although its C2B domain remains Ca2+-insensitive, which was supported by that the liposome attachment of S247D mutant was much stronger than that of wild type Syt11 (Fig. 2g). These findings also suggest that Ca2+-binding generates additional membrane attachment sites for Ca☑-Syts, thereby reinforcing their Ca2+-independent lipid interactions. Thus, we propose that the competitive effect of Syt11 on Syt1-lipid binding can be effectively negated by Ca2+. Consistent with this, 20 μM Ca2+ was sufficient for Syt1 to overcome competition from Syt11 (Fig. 2h). Considering that the activation of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) induces a transient (lasting ∼1–2 ms) local Ca2+ concentrations of ∼10–100 μM within nano/microdomains13,4850, our results reveal a fascinating inter-switch mechanism between Syt1 and Syt11 on membrane occupancy.

Lipid charge shielding by Ca2+ increases surface Zeta potential

Given the well-established Ca2+-insensitivity of Syt4 and Syt11, the universal Ca2+-inhibition effect observed here is unlikely attributable to the protein itself, but rather suggests a lipid-centered mechanism. We proposed that the Coulomb force between Syts and acidic lipids plays a central role in their interactions. The highly concentrated phosphate groups of PIP2 have been shown to facilitate Ca2+ chelation51, which may be responsible for the Ca2+-modulated Syt-membrane interactions. We performed electrophoretic light scattering (ELS) to measure the Zeta potential of 400-nm liposomes in different Ca2+ conditions (Fig. 3a). Strikingly, 0.05 mM CaCl2 was sufficient to increase the Zeta potential of the liposomes, indicating an effective shielding of negative charges of PIP2. This effect is not attributed to altered physical properties of the solution, such as conductivity or viscosity, because 10 mM KCl did not produce similar effect (Fig. 3b–d). These results are consistent with previous reports that high concentrations of Mg2+ inhibit Syt1-mediated liposome fusion38. Collectively, these findings suggest that the shielding of surface negative charges is a key contributor to the Ca2+-dependent inhibition of Syt-liposome interactions.

Fig. 3. Ca2+ shields electrostatic surface potential of acidic membranes.

Fig. 3

a Schematic of Zeta potential measurement via electrophoretic light scattering (ELS). b Ca2+ increases the surface potential of PC:PS:PIP2 liposomes (400 nm), with near-maximal effects at ~0.1 mM Ca2+. c 50 μM Ca2+ significantly alters membrane electrostatic states. Numbers of independent biological replicates are labeled on each bar. d Phase plot for Zeta potential calculation of liposomes at varying Ca2+ concentrations. Data are presented as the mean + s.e.m., one-way ANOVA and two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s. no significant difference. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Double-regional interactions confer Ca2+-sensitive Syt1-membrane associations

The highly basic surface of C2 domains may provide a large interface for association with acidic membrane. The K-rich motif of Syt1 is composed of 4 consecutive lysine (K) residues in both the C2A and C2B domains. However, in the C2B domain, this motif can be extended to an 8-residue fragment containing ~6 lysine/arginine (K/R) residues, forming a conserved feature shared by both Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts (Fig. 4a). To examine the role of these motifs in Ca2+-independent lipid binding, we mutated key residues in the K-rich motifs of Syt1-C2A and C2B domains and assessed their binding capabilities using co-LP assays (Fig. 4b). The Syt1-AKA (K189/190/191 to alanine in C2A) showed a minimal reduction in liposome-binding in Ca2+-free conditions, while Syt1-BKA (R322N-K324/325A in C2B) exhibited a dramatic decrease in binding. Furthermore, Syt1-ABKA (AKA + BKA), in which both motifs were mutated, completely lost its ability to bind liposomes. Importantly, Ca2+-dependent enhancement of lipid binding was retained in all mutants (Fig. 4c), suggesting a double-regional interaction (Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent) between Syt1 and liposomes. The Ca2+-independent lipid-binding was mediated primarily by the K-rich motif in the C2B domain, but not the C2A domain, which is consistent with the electrostatic analyses of Ca☑-Syts (Fig. 1). On the other hand, the Ca2+-dependent lipid-binding was mediated by Ca2+-binding loops in both C2A and C2B domains, independent of K-rich motifs (Figs. 2d, 4c). Collectively, these findings define both Ca2+-independent (through the K-rich motif in the C2B) and Ca2+-facilitated (Ca2+-binding loops in both C2 domains) Syt1-liposome interactions, highlighting the dual regulatory roles of Syt1 in lipid interactions.

Fig. 4. Syt11 employs a multi-regional redundant membrane-binding mode.

Fig. 4

a Conserved K-rich motifs in Syt-C2 domains. b K-rich motif of Syt1 displayed on structures. c Mutations in the K-rich motif of Syt1-C2B dramatically reduce liposome affinity, while C2A plays a minor role, indicating a primarily single-region membrane-binding mode for Syt1 in Ca2+-free conditions (n = 3 independent biological repeats). d The C2B, but not C2A, domain of Syt11contributes to liposome binding (n = 3 independent biological replicates). e The C2B, but not C2A, domain of Syt11 contributes to the competition with Syt1 for liposome binding (n = 4 independent biological replicates). f The K-rich motif of Syt11-C2B, and basic regions in loops 1, 2, and 3, displayed on structures. g Mutations in the K-rich motif of Syt11-C2B or deletions of loops 1, 2, 3, or 1 + 3 do not block liposome binding, suggesting redundant interactions (Syt11-BKA: n = 4 independent biological replicates; others: n = 3 independent biological replicates). hj Systematic single- (h), double- (i), and triple- (j) regional mutations reveal loss of liposome-binding, confirming a multi-regional membrane-binding mode of Syt11 (WT and BLp1m: n = 4 independent biological replicates; others: n = 3 independent biological replicates). k Mutated residues and regions displayed on Syt11-C2B structures. l Opposite-potential fragments in Ca☑- and Ca⌧-C2B domains highlight a alkaline region in the loop1 of Ca⌧-C2Bs for acidic membrane interaction. Data are presented as the mean + s.e.m.; two-tailed paired Student’s t test (de, g) for two-group comparison, and two-way ANOVA (c, e) and one-way ANOVA (g) for multi-group comparison. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, n.s. no significant difference. Source data and full scan gels are provided as a Source Data file.

Multi-regional interactions confer redundant binding of Syt11-C2B to the membrane

As for Ca⌧-Syt11, we found that the C2B domain, rather than the C2A domain, is responsible for liposome-binding and Ca2+-inhibition. No associations between the C2A and C2B domains were observed (Fig. 4d). Competition assay further demonstrated that only Syt11-C2B, but not Syt11-C2A, competes with Syt1 for liposome binding in Ca2+-free conditions (Fig. 4e), underscoring a central role of the C2B domain in Syt11-membrane interactions.

Strikingly, the mutations in the K-rich motif (K340N-R341N-K344/346A) of Syt11-C2B (Syt11-BKA) failed to abolish Ca2+-inhibition of its lipid-binding ability (Fig. 4f, g), suggesting additional binding interfaces in Syt11. Given that loop-1 and loop-3 are responsible for Ca2+-coordination and membrane insertion of the C2 domains in Ca☑-Syt1, we next investigated analogous basic residues in the loop regions of Syt11-C2B, despite their lack of Ca2+-binding ability. Systematic deletion of loops-1, 2, and 3 individually or in combination revealed that none of the Syt11-C2B mutants, including Δloop1 (C2B: aa319-325 to “GS”), Δloop2 (C2B: aa348-357 to “GSG”), Δloop3 (C2B: aa382-390 to “GGS”), or Δloop1 + 3 (Δloop1+Δloop3), showed abolished liposome-binding either (Fig. 4f, g), and all of them retained Ca2+-inhibition (Fig. 4g). These results suggest a redundant multi-regional interaction mode for Syt11-C2B in liposome binding.

To comprehensively define the membrane-binding mode of Syt11, we generated 14 Syt11-C2B mutants by permuting and combining the K-rich motif (Kmotifm) and 3 loop regions (BLp1m, BLp2m, and BLp3m). To preserve chemical properties of the protein, K/R/histidine (H) residues were mutated to N/glutamine (Q) instead of A, D, E, or glycine (G). These mutants were categorized into 3 groups: single-regional, double-regional, and triple-regional mutations. We found that the lipid-binding ability gently decreased but the Ca2+-inhibition remained in single-regional mutantss (Fig. 4h). Some double-regional mutants showed a significant decrease in lipid-binding (Fig. 4i), while most triple-regional mutants lost binding capability entirely (Fig. 4j). This defines a redundant multi-regional membrane-binding hierarchy for Syt11: C2B K-rich motif (primary) > C2B loop-1 > C2B loop-3 ≈ C2B loop-2 ≫ C2A (negligible).

Key sites for Syt11-C2B-lipid binding and the mutations examined in this study are summarized in Fig. 4k. Notably, Ca☑-Syt1 and Ca⌧-Syt11 share similar lipid-binding sites, except for a basic “KARH” fragment that confers sub-regional positive potential in loop-1 of Syt11-C2B, whereas the corresponding “EAKN” fragment in Syt1 exhibits an overall negative potential (Fig. 4l). This motif is exactly located in the short fragment representing a major electrostatic potential difference between the C2B domains of Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts (Fig. 1d). This suggests a universal yet distinct membrane-binding mode for Ca⌧-Syts, which may confer higher lipid-binding affinity in the absence of Ca2+, enabling competitive membrane binding. Together with the universal mechanism of Ca2+-inhibition of the K-rich motif, and the Ca2+-facilitation of the loop region in Ca☑-Syts, these findings provide a molecular basis for the activity-dependent Ca☑/Ca⌧-Syts inter-switch model mediating precise control of synaptic transmission.

PInP2 docks to specific regions of Syt11-C2B

To investigate the atomic mechanism underlying the interaction between Syt11 and acidic lipids, we applied in silico docking of the headgroup of PIP2 (PInP2) to predict the lipid-binding structure of Syt11-C2B (Fig. 5a). Previous studies have validated that the K-rich motif in the C2 domains of rabphilin and PKC serves as a basic binding pocket for the acidic headgroup of PIP252,53. Consistent with these findings, we found that PInP2 can dock into the same pocket of Syt11-C2B with various conformations, forming tight interactions mediated by electrostatic forces (Fig. 5b). We then generated a Syt11-Kmotifm mutation to neutralize the electric interference of the K-rich motif, and found that PInP2 could still dock to the basic regions of loop-1 and loop-2 in Syt11-C2B through electrostatic interactions (Fig. 5c). However, PInP2 failed to dock automatically to the loop-3 region of Syt11-Kmotifm or KmotifmBLp2m unless a predefined binding box was used to enforce interaction in this region (Fig. 5d). This suggests a synergistic effect between the K-rich motif and loop-3 in lipid-interactions, which is supported by the observed interaction between the glycerol backbone of PInP2 and K388 in loop-3 (Fig. 5b). Thus, loop-3 may play a more significant role in liposomal or in vivo conditions, where PIP2 is more abundant or clustered. These results define an atomic model of Syt11-lipid interactions, in which PIP2 binds to multiple regions of Syt11-C2B to form a large multi-point interface (Fig. 5e).

Fig. 5. In silico docking of PInP2 to Syt11-C2B.

Fig. 5

a Atomic view of Syt11-C2B and PInP2 docking. b PInP2 docks into the K-rich motif’s basic pocket in Syt11-C2B via electrostatic interactions. c PInP2 docks to basic regions on loops 1 and 2 of the Syt11-Kmotifm mutant. d PInP2 requires a predefined box to dock to the basic region of loop3, suggesting synergistic effects between loop3 and other regions, such as the K-rich motif. e Model of Syt11-C2B interacting with abundant PInP2s in the active zone of the plasma membrane.

Syt11-membrane interaction regulates exocytosis and endocytosis at different stages

We have previously established that Syt11 inhibits both clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) and activity-dependent bulk endocytosis during synaptic transmission4,5,14,19. To investigate the role of Syt11-lipid interactions in synaptic exocytosis and endocytosis, we next performed live synaptophysin-pHluorin (Syp-pH) imaging in cultured primary neurons. Cortical neurons from homozygous floxed Syt11-null mice were infected with synapsin-driven Cre-expressing (Syn-Cre) recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) to generate a knockout (KO) genotype, and full-length wild-type (WT) Syt11 or mutants were over-expressed to rescue the phenotypes (Fig. 6a). A sustained 70 mM KCl depolarization was applied to trigger exocytosis and endocytosis of synaptic vesicles, represented by the rising and decay of Syp-pH fluorescence signals (Fig. 6b, c). The differential of each trace (dF/dt) was calculated to assess the rate of exo-endocytosis (Fig. 6d).

Fig. 6. Syt11-membrane interaction regulates synaptic exocytosis and endocytosis.

Fig. 6

a Schematic of Syp–pH imaging in the synaptic bouton of a primary cortical neuron. b 70 mM K+ depolarization-triggered vesicle exo-endocytosis events, reflected by Syp-pH fluorescence. Scale bar: 20 μm. c Syp-pH signals show rising and decay phases across genotypes. d Derivative fluorescence signals (dF/dt) indicate the speed of exo-endocytosis. e Syt11-KO shortens acceleration time (from 0.1Vmax to Vmax) in the rising phase, indicating an inhibitory role of Syt11 in exocytosis. For normalization, only traces with similar F0 were calculated. f Syt11-KO does not affect Vmax. g Syt11-KO reduces τdecay, indicating endocytosis inhibition. Lipid-binding-deficient mutants fail to rescue Syt11-KO effects, confirming that the regulatory role of Syt11 in exo/endocytosis is mediated by protein-lipid interactions. h Hypothetical model of exo/endocytosis uncoupling and the cytoplasmic Ca2+ dynamics. Immediate post-stimulation decay reflects reduction of exocytosis and cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels. A Syt1-Syt11 inter-switch may mask Syt11’s influence on Vmax, depending on Ca2+ fluctuations during neuronal activity. Data are presented as the mean ± 90% CI for (c, d) and mean + s.e.m. for (eg); number of biological replicates were labeled as N in (eg); two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s. no significant difference. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

In our experiments, fluorescence changes reflect the collective activity of all vesicles per synapse rather than transient dynamics of individual vesicles. While the rising time depends on stimulation duration, the Vmax of the rising phase reflects the maximal exocytosis. To define the early stage of exocytosis, we calculated the rising time from 0.1·Vmax to Vmax as the acceleration time (taccel), during which interference from Ca2+ accumulation and endocytosis is minimized, allowing assessment of exocytosis driven by the fusion machinery. Strikingly, Syt11-KO reduced the taccel of Spy-pH, which was fully rescued by WT-Syt11 but not Syt11-Kmotifm or Syt11-BLp123m mutant (Fig. 6e), suggesting that Syt11 inhibits exocytosis via membrane-binding during the early stage of synaptic transmission. However, the Vmax of the rising phase remained unchanged in Syt11-KO neurons (Fig. 6f), suggesting that the inhibitory role of Syt11 is alleviated or abolished during sustained exocytosis when accumulated Ca2+ weakens Syt11-lipid interactions and promotes Syt1 competition. In the decaying phase, the exponentially fitted τdecay was dramatically reduced by Syt11-KO, which was rescued by WT-Syt11 but not the mutants (Fig. 6g), suggesting that the inhibitory role of Syt11 in endocytosis is also mediated via membrane binding. Therefore, we proposed a hypothetic working model of the molecular processes during Syp-pH imaging (Fig. 6h). The fluorescence change rate (dF/dt) is composed of a positive exocytosis component and a negative endocytosis component. Vesicular exocytosis mainly depends on Ca2+, while endocytosis depends on both Ca2+ and exocytic extent. Syt11 inhibits exocytosis through competitive binding to the plasma membrane at the early stage of Ca2+ rising, but not the high-activity stage following sustained stimulation, when high Ca2+ promotes a probable Syt1-Syt11 displacement to temporarily retire Syt11. The immediate and rapid decay of Syp-pH after 70 mM KCl treatment indicates an immediate and rapid restore of cytoplasmic Ca2+, removing the Ca2+-inhibition in Syt11-lipid binding and thus enabling Syt11 as a brake of endocytosis at this stage.

To investigate the impact of the altered Ca2+-affinity of Syt11-S247D on vesicle recycling, we conducted membrane capacitance (Cm) recordings in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons (Fig. S1a). A 200-ms depolarization stimulus induced a Cm jump and decay, validating that knock-down (KD) of Syt11 increased both the speed and the amount of endocytosis (Fig. S1b, c). Notably, the expression of the Syt11-S247D mutant led to a further increase in endocytic speed, but it did not affect the amount of endocytosis. The Cm decay in Syt11S247D-rescued neurons was initially very rapid, reaching a stationary phase more quickly than in control conditions, and the overshoot phenomenon observed in KD neurons was effectively eliminated (Fig. S1a). This behavior can be rationalized by considering the dual-stage function of Syt11-S247D. In the early phase, when Ca2+ levels are high, Syt11-S247D can sense Ca2+ and accelerate endocytosis similarly to a canonical Ca☑-Syt, such as Syt1. However, as Ca2+ levels decline at the later phase, Syt11-S247D reverts to functioning like WT Syt11, thereby rescuing the KD effect. This switch is likely attributed to that the S247D mutant selectively restores the Ca2+ affinity of the C2A domain, while leaving the C2B domain unaffected. Consequently, its overall Ca2+ sensitivity remains lower than that of canonical Ca☑-Syts like Syt1, rendering it inactive under low Ca2+ conditions.

Discussion

Collectively, our findings reveal a multiple-point lipid-binding interface for both Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts, but with quite different membrane interaction modes (Fig. 7). Ca☑-Syt1 primarily binds the acidic membrane via the highly basic K-rich motif in the C2B domain in the absence of Ca2+, and Ca2+ binding to loops 1-3 of both C2 domains dramatically enhances membrane insertion into phospholipid bilayer, leading to membrane deformation. In contrast, Ca⌧-Syt11 adopts a multi-regional interaction involving the K-rich motif and basic sites on loops 1, 2, and 3 of the C2B domain, in which the “KARH” fragment on loop-1 may confer higher lipid-binding affinity in Ca2+-free conditions. The surface distribution of these regions might enable Syt11 to prefer curved membranes or stabilize curvature. However, Ca2+ does not bind Syt11 but interacts strongly with the acidic headgroups of lipids, effectively weakening the membrane-binding of Syt11 via electrostatic shielding. This mechanism facilitates the Syt1-Syt11 inter-switch in membrane occupancy during synaptic transmission.

Fig. 7. Working model of Syt11 function in neural secretion.

Fig. 7

In molecular terms, Syt11 engages in C2B-driven, multi-regional, and Ca2+-sensitive acidic membrane interactions. Ca2+ inhibits the lipid-binding of Syt11 but promotes Syt1-membrane interactions. Physiological Ca2+ levels block the competitive effect of Syt11 with Syt1 in membrane occupancy. Synaptically, the inhibitory role of Syt11 in exo/endocytosis, mediated by membrane interactions, is allocated via a Syt1-Syt11 inter-switch in high-activity, high-Ca2+ conditions (e.g., continuous neuronal excitation). This model underscores Syt proteins as direct regulators for vesicle recycling, extends Ca2+-sensitivity to Ca⌧-Syts, and highlights Syt family similarity, diversity, and functional connections.

At the synaptic level, the strong membrane-binding ability of Syt11 may contribute to the vesicle docking in resting states (given its strong membrane affinity and our previous report showing that Syt11-KO led to a reduced Cm jump by a 200 ms depolarization pulse stimulus in DRG neurons19). During low-activity exocytosis, action potential (AP)-induced Ca2+ influx triggers membrane penetration of Syt1 and the subsequent vesicle-plasma membrane fusion. Syt11 remains membrane-bound and inhibits early exocytosis dynamics. However, sustained excitation leads to Ca2+-accumulation and weakens Syt11’s membrane affinity, enabling free Syt1 to displace Syt11 and thus accelerating fusion. Syt1, a major synaptic vesicle protein (7–8% of total vesicle proteins)30, is well-suited for such displacement under physiological conditions. Syt11 re-establishes its inhibitory roles in endocytosis by re-displacing Syt1 when cytoplasmic Ca2+ decays from the steady state. Therefore, the dynamic competitive membrane-binding of Syt1 and Syt11 cooperatively controls both precise excitation-secretion coupling and tight exocytosis-endocytosis coupling during synaptic transmission (Fig. 7).

Although Syt proteins are well-established as primary Ca2+ sensors mediating exocytosis and endocytosis, the coexistence of numerous Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts in synaptic transmission remains enigmatic. The molecular properties and regulatory mechanisms of Ca⌧-Syts are particularly poorly understood. Here we elucidate the lipid-binding properties and Ca2+-sensitivity of both Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts, define a multi-point Syt-lipid interface, and propose a Syt1-Syt11 inter-switch model governing the precise control of excitation-secretion coupling and vesicle recycling during synaptic transmission.

Non-Ca2+-affinitive but highly alkaline

While the functions of Ca☑-Syts are well-documented in neuronal and non-neuronal cells, Ca⌧-Syts have been considered evolutionarily functional-deficient. However, the greater number of Ca⌧-Syts suggests their underappreciated roles in the brain. For instance, Syt4, one of the earliest identified Ca⌧-Syts, has been reported to inhibit exocytosis and endocytosis with unknown mechanisms17,18. Syt11, linked to Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia4,5,19,54, is gaining attention. We reveal that the high alkalinity of the C2B domain is a common feature of most Syts. Sequence similarity analyses indicate that some Ca⌧-Syts (Syt 4, 8, and 11) share more similarities with Ca☑-Syts, suggesting functional consistency between them in certain aspects. Consistent with this, we found that Syt11 inhibits exo/endocytosis via the membrane interaction with its strongly positively-charged surface, which is similar as Syt1 but with opposing biological effects. Remarkably, Ca⌧-Syts exhibit a higher average surface electrostatic potential and larger basic surface area than Ca☑-Syts, suggesting that they evolved to lose their Ca2+-binding ability while gaining higher resting-state membrane affinity.

C2A vs C2B

Most C2B domains are highly alkaline, whereas C2A domains are not, often being acidic. The co-LP assays show weak lipid-binding ability of C2A domains of both Syt1 and Syt11 in Ca2+-free conditions. Although the C2A domain is required for Syt1 to support fast synchronous release55,56 and enhance lipid affinity with Ca2+, it is redundant for membrane-binding. In contrast, the C2B domain of Syt1 is capable of self-assembling into ring-like oligomers and plays a key role in vesicle docking, clamping-to-fusion switch, and fusion pore dilation5763. However, the tandem C2AB domains of Syt 1/7 bind membranes more strongly than individual domains64, and the orientation of C2A and C2B, modulated by the poly-proline linkers, is critical for exocytosis65. Moreover, Syt1-C2A prefers vesicle membranes to the plasma membrane, while C2B does the opposite, leading to a Ca2+-activated bridging effect6670. For Syt11, the C2A domain is dispensable for membrane-binding but may interact with proteins like Vti1a to inhibit spontaneous neurotransmission71. Some Syt C2A domains (Syts 7, 14, 15, and 16) remain alkaline (Fig. 1), suggesting a higher Ca2+-independent lipid-binding probability. In agreement with this, the membrane affinity and Ca2+-sensitivity of Syt7-C2A is much higher than that of Syt17274.

Non-Ca2+-affinitive but Ca2+-sensitive

Neuronal activity is modulated by intracellular Ca2+. Ca⌧-Syts, though lacking Ca2+-binding ability, remain sensitive to neural activity and thus may play essential roles in synaptic transmission. The non-Ca2+-affinity of Syt11 is determined by its amino acid sequence and has been validated by thermal denaturation and nuclear magnetic resonance studies2,75. Here, we have defined the Ca2+-sensitive lipid-binding of Syt11 in vitro and in situ, which is suppressed by high levels of Ca2+. A similar inhibitory phenomenon has been observed in early studies of Ca☑-Syts, where GST-Syts were used to pull-down liposomes76. This Ca2+-sensitivity is shared by Syt4 and Ca2+-deficient Syt1 mutants. Membrane-binding and Ca2+-sensitivity together define Ca⌧-Syts as fine-tuned regulators during synaptic transmission.

Multi-regional lipid-binding

Screening of the lipid-binding sites on Syt1/11-C2B identify distinct Ca2+-dependent binding-modes between them. Syt1 binds to lipid via a K-rich motif in Ca2+-free conditions, transitioning to a dual-regional binding mode (K-rich motif and Ca2+-binding loops) in the presence of Ca2+. In contrast, Syt11 adopts a multi-regional mode (K-rich motif and basic loop regions) in resting states, which is abolished by high Ca2+. The conserved K-rich motif, the primary lipid-binding region of both Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts in resting states, has been termed as “polybasic strand” or “polylysine patch”. However, only Ca☑-Syts (except Syt7) and the Ca⌧-Syt8 contain the canonical pattern of consecutive four basic residues, while a more general pattern is the basic residue-enriched short strand (~6 K/R enriched 8 aa) when extended to Ca⌧-Syts. Moreover, we use “motif” to hint at a correspondence to the biological function of this fragment, e.g., acidic membrane binding, instead of “strand” or “patch” which are just structural descriptions.

Interplay between Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts

We found that Ca2+ not only enhances membrane-affinity of Ca☑-Syts but also dose-dependently inhibits the membrane-binding of Ca⌧-Syts. This bi-directional promotion-inhibition effect drives a membrane-occupying switch between Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts, in which Syt11 competes with Syt1 under resting conditions but is excluded by Syt1 upon strong neural excitation, providing a fine-tune control of vesicular exocytosis by microdomain Ca2+ during synaptic transmission. Post-exocytosis, we have demonstrated the bidirectional role of Syt1 in endocytosis via its membrane remodeling ability14, as well as the constitutively inhibitory role of Syt11 in endocytosis, with mechanisms remained unknown4,5,8,19,77. Here, we found that the Ca2+-independent membrane-remodeling enables Syt11 as a constitutive brake of endocytosis, while the Ca2+-sensitivity of this binding-ability establishes the dynamic modulation of Syt11-membrane attachment and thus the activity-dependent removal of this endocytic brake. Collectively, these findings suggest a Syt1–Syt11 inter-switch working model mediating both the excitation-secretion coupling and the exocytosis-endocytosis coupling during synaptic transmission, emphasizing the cooperation and competition within the Syt family, especially that between Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts, in neural or non-neural cells.

Ca2+-affinitive phospholipid membrane

The interaction between Ca2+/Mg2+ and PIP2 has been extensively documented across various chemical studies51,7881, in which the phenomenon of PIP2 shielding provides a compelling explanation for the Ca2+-mediated inhibition of Syt11-membrane binding observed in the present work. Similar Mg2+ shielding effects have been reported to abrogate Syt1-SNARE interactions and thus inhibit vesicle fusion38. Ca2+ has been shown to increase the surface potential of PC:PIP2 liposomes more effectively than Mg2+, but the concentrations below 0.1 mM show only minimal effects82. Therefore, the role of Ca2+-lipid interplay has long been under-estimated during synaptic transmission. Here, we found that 0.05 mM Ca2+, a physiological level of free intracellular Ca2+ during neural activity, is sufficient to induce a dramatic increase in the Zeta potential of PC:PS:PIP2 liposomes. Moreover, the microdomain PIP2-Ca2+ coordination could be facilitated by that: (1) PIP2 is concentrated in exo/endocytic hot-spots; (2) the tightly-coupling between Ca2+ channel and fusion machinery83 can generate a nanodomain of >100 μM Ca2+ near the fusion sites; (3) the transmembrane potential (TMP) inversion post-depolarization also drives the influent Ca2+ to diffuse toward the inner membrane. Collectively, we propose a PIP2-Ca2+ chelation model for the dynamic modulation of Ca☑-Syts/Ca⌧-Syts inter-switches in membrane occupancy (Fig. 7).

Efficiency of Ca2+ inhibition

High concentrations of Ca2+ are required to inhibit Syt11 to a significant extent, and the average intracellular Ca2+ levels rarely exceed 100 μM. However, it is important to recognize that Ca2+ signaling is highly compartmentalization, with local Ca2+ concentration vary significantly84. This compartmentalization is particularly pronounced in synapses, where voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) directly interact with Syt and SNARE proteins, positioning them close to the fusion site and forming Ca2+ micro- and nano-domains85. For instance, a 120 μs depolarization simulating an AP in Xenopus neuromuscular junction (NMJ) synapse can generate local Ca2+ concentration >150 μM86. Similarly, the giant squid synapse can produce Ca2+ microdomains ranging from 200 to 300 μM87, and local Ca2+ concentrations in anuran hair cell synapse has been measured to vary between 10 μM and 1 mM88. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that Syts, including Syt11, frequently encounter high Ca2+ levels, especially under conditions of high synaptic activity.

A primary concern regarding the Ca2+-shifted competition between Syt1 and Syt11 is that Syt1 is well-known for its highly Ca2+-sensitive membrane binding, which exceeds that of Syt11. To assess the relative contributions of Syt11 and Syt1, we used Ca2+-binding deficient Syt1 mutants in Ca2+-sensitive competition assays. However, Syt1-D2N and Syt1-D2E, while losing Ca2+-promoted binding, exhibited Ca2+-inhibition in lipid binding similar to Syt11 (Fig. 2d), complicating the interpretation of our results. Despite these challenges, we propose that the Ca2+-promoted binding of Syt1 and the Ca2+-inhibited binding of Syt11 work synergistically to drive Ca2+-sensitive competition. Even if Syt11’s contribution is relatively smaller, the observed Ca2+-sensitive competition supports our model of Syt1-Syt11 inter-switching.

Collectively, this work reveals diverse membrane-binding abilities of both Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts, defines a multi-point Syt-membrane interface, pinpoints both Ca2+-inhibition and Ca2+-facilitation of Ca☑-Syt membrane interactions, demonstrates the Ca2+-sensitive membrane-binding abilities of Ca⌧-Syts, and proposes the activity-dependent Syt1-Syt11 inter-switch membrane-occupancy as a promising and fine-tuned working mode controlling both excitation-secretion coupling and exocytosis–endocytosis coupling during synaptic transmission. This model extends the understanding of the Ca2+-sensitivity of non-Ca2+-affinitive Syts, and highlights the kinetic interplay between Ca☑- and Ca⌧-Syts during neural secretion. Given pathogenic roles of Syt11 in both PD-like neurotoxicity (via the impaired vesicle recycling)4,14,19,54 and schizophrenia (via the accelerated vesicle recycling)14, this work underscores critical roles of fine-tuned vesicle recycling in the homeostasis of neurotransmission.

Methods

Ethics statement

For all animal studies, the use and care of animals were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and regulations approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Xi’an Jiaotong University (NO.2016-10).

Structural analyses

All structures of C2 domains used in this study were predicted using AlphaFold 239,40. Amino acid sequence similarity analyses of all Syts were performed using Clustal Omega89. The sequences used from humans are (hSyt 1-17): P21579, Q8N9I0, Q9BQG1, O00445, Q5T7P8, O43581, Q86SS6, Q6XYQ8, Q9H2B2, Q8NBV8, Q9BT88, Q8IV01, Q7L8C5, Q8NB59, Q9BQS2, Q17RD7, and Q9BSW7. The sequences used from rat are (rSyt 1-17): P21707, P29101, P40748, P47861, Q62746, Q62747, Q925C0, O08625, P50232, Q925B4, O08835, P97610, Q925B5, M0R7W7, P59926, A0A0G2K644, and Q62807. The isoelectric points (pI) of C2 domains were calculated using the ExPASy Server90. Electrostatic potential calculations for each C2 domain were performed using Protein-Sol91. Solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) calculations and protein structure mutagenesis were performed using PyMol. In silico docking of the PIP2 headgroup (PInP2, CID 125105) to Syt11-C2B was performed using DockThor92.

Plasmids

For the expression of cytoplasmic tandem C2A-C2B domains of Syt for co-liposome precipitation (co-LP) experiments, the rat Syt1 (rSyt1, aa139-421) and Syt11 (rSyt11, aa154-430) sequences were cloned into the pET-His vector. The isolated C2A and C2B domains of rSyt11 were defined as aa154-282 and aa290-430, respectively, and cloned into the pET-His and pRSFDuet-sumo vectors. For the Syt11-Syt1 competition assays, the rSyt1-C2AB (aa96-421) was expressed from the pGEX-KG vector described in our previous research14. All mutants were generated using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The mutated sites are as follows: Syt1-AKA (C2A domain: K189/190/191-to-A), Syt1-BKA (C2B domain: R322-to-N and K324/325-to-A), Syt1-ABKA (combination of AKA and BKA mutations), Syt11-BKA (C2B domain: K340-to-N, R341-to-N, and K344/346-to-A), Syt11-Δloop1 (C2B domain: aa319-325 replaced with “GS”), Syt11-Δloop3 (C2B domain: aa382-390 replaced with “GGS”), Syt11-Δloop1 + 3 (combination of Δloop1 and Δloop3 mutations), Syt11-Δloop2 (C2B domain: aa348-357 replaced with “GSG”), and Syt11-Kmotif/BLp1/2/3 m (see Fig. 4k for details). For the K-motif of Syt11, 4 of the 6 K/R residues were randomly selected for mutation. The H/K/R residues mutated in loop1/2/3 were chosen based on their alkaline properties. The primers used to generate these mutants are listed in Table S1. They are available for reuse from the corresponding author upon request.

Protein purification

Constructs were transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) and cultured in lysogeny broth at 37 °C to an optical density of ~1.0. Protein expression was induced with 0.2 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 18 °C for 10 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C and resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 5% glycerol, 0.2% Triton X-100, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, and 1 mM PMSF). After sonication softly on ice and centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 30 min, the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 μm pore-size membrane. For pGEX-KG-expressed proteins, the supernatant was further incubated with Glutathione Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) at 4 °C for 2 h. Beads were collected by centrifugation at 400 × g for 3 min and washed thoroughly with 10 μg/mL DNase I and 10 μg/mL RNase I in the binding buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol), then eluted with additional 10 mM reduced glutathione (GSH). For the preparation of tag-free Syt1, thrombin digestion was carried out on the beads at room temperature for 30 min, and then the flow-through containing the cleaved protein was collected. For pET-His and pRSFDuet-sumo-expressed proteins, Ni-NTA Sepharose 6FF beads were used for purification. Proteins on column were washed with additional 40 mM imidazole, then eluted with 400 mM imidazole. The purified proteins were checked via Nanodrop for a 280:260 nm absorbance ratio >1.8 and concentrated to ~10 mg/mL.

Liposome preparation

For co-LP assays, phospholipids (Avanti) were mixed in chloroform with indicated compositions and dried under vacuum. Lipids were resuspended in binding buffer to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, vortexed thoroughly for 5 min, and subjected to 5 freeze-thaw cycles to form large multilamellar vesicles. For Zeta potential measurements, liposomes containing either 2% or 10% PIP2 were used to assess their coordination with Ca2+. The liposomes were prepared in ELS buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 40 mM NaCl; the lower salt concentration was chosen to facilitate electrophoresis), with 15 freeze-thaw cycles, followed by extrusion through 400-nm polycarbonate filters for another 15 cycles to generate homogenous unilamellar vesicles.

Co-LP assays

Co-LP assays were performed at room temperature (RT) in binding buffer with additional amounts of EDTA, CaCl2, or KCl. Syt proteins (5 μg) were pre-incubated in binding buffer for 10 min, centrifuged to remove unstable precipitates, and incubated with 10 μg liposomes for 30 min. Liposomes were collected by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 20 min, and co-precipitated Syt proteins were analyzed via SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. Band intensities were quantified using Fiji93. Full gel scans and quantified data were supplied in the Source Data file.

Zeta potential measurements

The surface potential of liposomes was measured via electrophoretic light scattering using a Zetasizer Nano ZSE (Malvern). Liposomes were diluted to 0.1 mg/mL in buffers with indicated concentrations of CaCl2 or KCl, and Zeta potential was calculated using phase analysis light scattering.

Animals and viruses

Floxed Syt11-null (syt11f/f) transgenic mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (strain B6.129-Syt11tm1Sud/J). C57BL/6J (B6) mice were sourced from Charles River Laboratories. The use and care of animals were approved and directed by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Xi’an Jiaotong University. All animals were housed in the animal facility of Xi’an Jiaotong University, maintained under a 12-h light/dark cycle at 22 ± 2 °C and 40–60% humidity, and provided with ad libitum access to food and water. The animals were finally euthanized with CO2, followed by cervical dislocation. For each experiment, the postnatal day 0 (P0) to P2 C57 or syt11f/f mice of both sexes (overall number of 20) were used for primary cortical neuron culture. Wistar rats (male, ~60 g, overall number of 6) were used for DRG culture. AAV2/9 used for primary neuron transfection included: AAV2/9-Psyn-Cre produced by Shanghai Heyuan Biotech, AAV2/9-Pcag-DIO-Syp-pHluorin produced by Hanbio Biotechnology, and AAV2/9-Pef1α-DIO-rSyt11-P2A-mCherry and its mutants (Kmotifm, BLp123m) produced by BrainVTA.

Cortical neuron culture and transfection

Primary cortical neurons were isolated and cultured as previously described with few modifications94. Anterior cortex tissues from P0 to P2 mice were dissected and cut into ~1 mm pieces in the Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS). The tissue fragments were digested with 0.25% trypsin at 37 °C for ~12 min, followed by three rounds of mechanical dissociation using the 1 mL tips on pipettes. Neurons were plated on poly-L-lysine-coated glass coverslips and maintained in DMEM (Gibco) + 10% FBS medium for 4 h, which was then replaced with Neurobasal (Gibco) + 2% B27 + 1% GlutMAX medium. Five micromolar cytosine arabinoside was added at day 2 in vitro (DIV2) to suppress glia growth. Medium were half-changed every 3–4 days. rAAV transfection was performed at DIV6, and experiments were conducted on mature neurons after DIV14.

DRG neuron culture and Cm recording

The culture of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons and the membrane capacitance (Cm) recordings were performed as previously described (PMID: 26589353). Adult Wistar rats (male, ~60 g) were used to isolate DRGs in ice-cold L15 medium (Gibco). The ganglia were treated with a mixture of trypsin (0.3 mg/ml) and collagenase (1 mg/ml) for 40 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, cells were dissociated, collected, and transfected using the NeonTM transfection system (MPK10096, Invitrogen). Cells were then plated on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)-F12 supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco). For gene silencing experiments, 24 h post-transfection, the culture medium was replaced with Neurobasal-A medium supplemented with 2% B27 (Gibco), 0.5 mM L-glutamine (Gibco), 10 ng/ml nerve growth factor, and 5 μM cytosine arabinoside. Experiments were performed at day 2 in vitro (DIV2).

To silence the expression of Syt11, the nucleotide target sequences G GCT GAG ATC ACA AAT ATA CG (shSyt11) was synthesized and inserted into the plasmid pRNAT-H1.1-GFP-shSyt11. A random sequence (TTC TCC GAA CGT GTC ACG T), which was predicted to target no genes in human, rat, and mouse cells, was used as a negative control. For rescue experiments, an RNAi-resistant form of rSyt11 was generated by introducing the following silent mutations: G GCG GAAATTACCAAT ATACG.

Cm recordings were performed under the whole-cell configuration using an EPC10/2 amplifier controlled by Pulse software (HEKA Elektronik). The membrane potential was clamped at −70 mV, and pipette resistance was maintained between 3 and 4 MΩ. The external solution contained (in mM) 150 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 H-HEPES, and 10 D-glucose (pH 7.4). The intracellular pipette solution contained (in mM) 153 CsCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 H-HEPES, and 4 Mg-ATP (pH 7.2). A 200 ms membrane depolarization was used to induce exocytosis and endocytosis. Data were collected with PatchMaster v2x90.2 (HEKA EPC10). Offline data analysis was performed using Igor Pro 6.22 software (Wavemetrics), with capacitance traces low-pass filtered at 30 Hz.

Syp-pH imaging

The real-time synaptic fluorescence imaging was performed using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. An inverted microscope equipped with a 100 × TIRF objective lens (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti-U; numerical aperture 1.45) was used for image-capturing via an Andor EMCCD camera with NIS-Elements BR software, with an exposure time of 100 ms per frame. Neurons were bathed in resting solution (in mM: 140 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 D-glucose, and 10 HEPES pH 7.4), and high K+ solution (changed to 72.5 mM NaCl, 70 mM KCl) was locally applied to induce neuronal activity. Time-series signals were analyzed using Fiji 1.54f and Graphpad Prism 8.0 for smoothing and differentiation.

Statistics

All experiments were performed with side-by-side controls and in random order, and were replicated at least three times. No samples that provided successful measurements were excluded from analysis. All the data are presented as the mean ± s.e.m. Statistical comparisons were made with the one/two-way ANOVA, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test or paired Student’s t test as indicated. Normality of the data was tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test, and the equality of variance was determined with Lenene’s test. All the statistical analyses were made using GraphPad Prism 8.0 (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA), and significant differences were accepted at P < 0.05. Numbers of cells or biological repeats analyzed are indicated in the figures and figure legends.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (338.2KB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (5MB, pdf)

Source data

Source Data (6MB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Yachong Hu (Xi’an Jiaotong University, China) for assistance with liposome preparation; Yayun Ma and Mingming Gan (Core Facilities Sharing Platform, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China) for assistance with Zetasizer; the Experimental Animal Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University for carefully raising each kind of experimental animal. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32571210 to H.X., 32525031 and 32171233 to C.W., 32400650 to R.H.), the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province of China (2024JC-YBMS-146 to H.X., 2023-ZDLSF-23 to C.W., 2025SF-YBXM-320 to Q.S., 2024JC-YBMS-141 to R.H.), Sanqin Talent Special Support Program (2024STD04 to C.W., 2023SYJ09 to R.H.), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2025ZNSFSC0013 and 2024ZYD0077 to X.K.), the Shaanxi Postdoc Funding (2023BSHTBZZ15 to H.X.), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2025MS1180 to X.K.), the Luzhou Science and technology Program (2024LZXNYDJ002 to X.K.).

Author contributions

H.X., C.W., Q.S., and L.J. conceived the study and designed the experiments with the help of J.H., Y.L., C.M., X.K., R.H., and S.Z. X.W., J.Y., J.H., S.H., B.W., Z.L., Y.P., and H.F. performed the experiments and analyses. H.X., C.W., Q.S., L.J., and X.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved its submission.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

All data presented in this study are either included in this article and its Supplemental Information or are available upon request to the corresponding author. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Xuanang Wu, Jingyu Yao, Jingxiao Huo.

Contributor Information

Xuanang Wu, Email: anicqnumber@126.com.

Lianying Jiao, Email: jiaoly@xjtu.edu.cn.

Qian Song, Email: songqian1986@xjtu.edu.cn.

Changhe Wang, Email: changhewang@xjtu.edu.cn.

Huadong Xu, Email: hdxu@pku.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-025-67320-4.

References

  • 1.Park, Y. & Ryu, J.-K. Models of synaptotagmin-1 to trigger Ca2+-dependent vesicle fusion. FEBS Lett.592, 3480–3492 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.von Poser, C., Ichtchenko, K., Shao, X., Rizo, J. & Südhof, T. C. The evolutionary pressure to inactivate. A subclass of synaptotagmins with an amino acid substitution that abolishes Ca2+ binding. J. Biol. Chem.272, 14314–14319 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Inoue, S. et al. Synaptotagmin XI as a candidate gene for susceptibility to schizophrenia. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet.144b, 332–340 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang, C. et al. Synaptotagmin-11 is a critical mediator of parkin-linked neurotoxicity and Parkinson’s disease-like pathology. Nat. Commun.9, 81 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen, Y. et al. Synaptotagmin-11 deficiency mediates schizophrenia-like behaviors in mice via dopamine over-transmission. Nat. Commun.15, 10571 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mittelsteadt, T. et al. Differential mRNA expression patterns of the synaptotagmin gene family in the rodent brain. J. Comp. Neurol.512, 514–528 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wolfes, A. C. & Dean, C. The diversity of synaptotagmin isoforms. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.63, 198–209 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu, X., Hu, S., Kang, X. & Wang, C. Synaptotagmins: beyond Presynaptic Neurotransmitter Release. Neuroscientist26, 9–15 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lai, Y. et al. Inhibition of calcium-triggered secretion by hydrocarbon-stapled peptides. Nature603, 949–956 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xu, J., Mashimo, T. & Südhof, T. C. Synaptotagmin-1, -2, and -9: Ca2+ sensors for fast release that specify distinct presynaptic properties in subsets of neurons. Neuron54, 567–581 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bacaj, T. et al. Synaptotagmin-1 and synaptotagmin-7 trigger synchronous and asynchronous phases of neurotransmitter release. Neuron80, 947–959 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen, C., Satterfield, R., Young, S. M. & Jonas, P. Triple function of synaptotagmin 7 ensures efficiency of high-frequency transmission at central GABAergic synapses. Cell Rep.21, 2082–2089 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Volynski, K. E. & Krishnakumar, S. S. Synergistic control of neurotransmitter release by different members of the synaptotagmin family. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.51, 154–162 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen, Y. et al. Synaptotagmin-1 is a bidirectional Ca2+ sensor for neuronal endocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA119, e2111051119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Awasthi, A. et al. Synaptotagmin-3 drives AMPA receptor endocytosis, depression of synapse strength, and forgetting. Science363, 10.1126/science.aav1483 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Bhalla, A., Chicka, M. C. & Chapman, E. R. Analysis of the synaptotagmin family during reconstituted membrane fusion. J. Biol. Chem.283, 21799–21807 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dean, C. et al. Synaptotagmin-IV modulates synaptic function and long-term potentiation by regulating BDNF release. Nat. Neurosci.12, 767–776 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang, Z., Bhalla, A., Dean, C., Chapman, E. R. & Jackson, M. B. Synaptotagmin IV: a multifunctional regulator of peptidergic nerve terminals. Nat. Neurosci.12, 163–171 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang, C. et al. Synaptotagmin-11 inhibits clathrin-mediated and bulk endocytosis. EMBO Rep.17, 47–63-63 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhou, Q. et al. Architecture of the synaptotagmin–SNARE machinery for neuronal exocytosis. Nature525, 62–67 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou, Q. et al. The primed SNARE–complexin–synaptotagmin complex for neuronal exocytosis. Nature548, 420–425 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schupp, M. et al. Interactions Between SNAP-25 and Synaptotagmin-1 Are Involved in Vesicle Priming, Clamping Spontaneous and Stimulating Evoked Neurotransmission. J. Neurosci.36, 11865–11880 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grushin, K. et al. Structural basis for the clamping and Ca2+ activation of SNARE-mediated fusion by synaptotagmin. Nat. Commun.10, 2413 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Courtney, N. A., Bao, H., Briguglio, J. S. & Chapman, E. R. Synaptotagmin 1 clamps synaptic vesicle fusion in mammalian neurons independent of complexin. Nat. Commun.10, 4076 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chang, S., Trimbuch, T. & Rosenmund, C. Synaptotagmin-1 drives synchronous Ca2+-triggered fusion by C2B-domain-mediated synaptic-vesicle-membrane attachment. Nat. Neurosci.21, 33–40 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen, Y. et al. Synaptotagmin-1 interacts with PI(4,5)P2 to initiate synaptic vesicle docking in hippocampal neurons. Cell Rep.34, 108842 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tsemperouli, M. et al. Vesicle docking and fusion pore modulation by the neuronal calcium sensor Synaptotagmin-1. Biophys. J.10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.023 (2024).
  • 28.Brose, N., Petrenko, A. G., Südhof, T. C. & Jahn, R. Synaptotagmin: a calcium sensor on the synaptic vesicle surface. Science256, 1021–1025 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Davletov, B. A. & Südhof, T. C. A single C2 domain from synaptotagmin I is sufficient for high affinity Ca2+/phospholipid binding. J. Biol. Chem.268, 26386–26390 (1993). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chapman, E. R. & Jahn, R. Calcium-dependent interaction of the cytoplasmic region of synaptotagmin with membranes. Autonomous function of a single C2-homologous domain. J. Biol. Chem.269, 5735–5741 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chapman, E. R. & Davis, A. F. Direct interaction of a Ca2+-binding loop of synaptotagmin with lipid bilayers. J. Biol. Chem.273, 13995–14001 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bai, J., Tucker, W. C. & Chapman, E. R. PIP2 increases the speed of response of synaptotagmin and steers its membrane-penetration activity toward the plasma membrane. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.11, 36–44 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kuo, W., Herrick, D. Z., Ellena, J. F. & Cafiso, D. S. The calcium-dependent and calcium-independent membrane binding of synaptotagmin 1: two modes of C2B binding. J. Mol. Biol.387, 284–294 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pérez-Lara, Á et al. PtdInsP2 and PtdSer cooperate to trap synaptotagmin-1 to the plasma membrane in the presence of calcium. eLife5, e15886 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.van den Bogaart, G., Meyenberg, K., Diederichsen, U. & Jahn, R. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate increases Ca2+ affinity of synaptotagmin-1 by 40-fold. J. Biol. Chem.287, 16447–16453 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bai, J., Wang, P. & Chapman, E. R. C2A activates a cryptic Ca(2+)-triggered membrane penetration activity within the C2B domain of synaptotagmin I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99, 1665–1670 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tucker, W. C., Weber, T. & Chapman, E. R. Reconstitution of Ca2+-regulated membrane fusion by synaptotagmin and SNAREs. Science304, 435–438 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Park, Y. et al. Synaptotagmin-1 binds to PIP2-containing membrane but not to SNAREs at physiological ionic strength. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.22, 815–823 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature596, 583–589 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database in 2024: providing structure coverage for over 214 million protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res.52, D368–D375 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Svennerholm, L. Distribution and fatty acid composition of phosphoglycerides in normal human brain. J. Lipid Res.9, 570–579 (1968). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cremona, O. et al. Essential role of phosphoinositide metabolism in synaptic vesicle recycling. Cell99, 179–188 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wenk, M. R. et al. Phosphoinositide profiling in complex lipid mixtures using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol.21, 813–817 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aoyagi, K. et al. The activation of exocytotic sites by the formation of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate microdomains at syntaxin clusters. J. Biol. Chem.280, 17346–17352 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Milosevic, I. et al. Plasmalemmal phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate level regulates the releasable vesicle pool size in chromaffin cells. J. Neurosci.25, 2557–2565 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.James, D. J., Khodthong, C., Kowalchyk, J. A. & Martin, T. F. J. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate regulates SNARE-dependent membrane fusion. J. Cell Biol.182, 355–366 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.van den Bogaart, G. et al. Membrane protein sequestering by ionic protein–lipid interactions. Nature479, 552–555 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stern, M. D. Buffering of calcium in the vicinity of a channel pore. Cell Calcium13, 183–192 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fakler, B. & Adelman, J. P. Control of KCa channels by calcium nano/microdomains. Neuron59, 873–881 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tadross, M. R., Tsien, R. W. & Yue, D. T. Ca2+ channel nanodomains boost local Ca2+ amplitude. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA110, 15794–15799 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Levental, I. et al. Calcium-dependent lateral organization in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2)- and cholesterol-containing monolayers. Biochemistry48, 8241–8248 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Guerrero-Valero, M. et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into the association of PKCalpha-C2 domain to PtdIns(4,5)P2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA106, 6603–6607 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ferrer-Orta, C. et al. Structural characterization of the Rabphilin-3A–SNAP25 interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA114, E5343–E5351 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dong, N. et al. Compensatory synaptotagmin-11 expression conceals parkinson’s disease-like phenotypes in parkin knockout mice. Cell Commun. Signal23, 61 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lee, J., Guan, Z., Akbergenova, Y. & Littleton, J. T. Genetic analysis of synaptotagmin C2 domain specificity in regulating spontaneous and evoked neurotransmitter release. J. Neurosci.33, 187–200 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wu, Z. et al. Polybasic patches in both C2 domains of synaptotagmin-1 are required for evoked neurotransmitter release. J. Neurosci.42, 5816–5829 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang, J. et al. Calcium sensitive ring-like oligomers formed by synaptotagmin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA111, 13966–13971 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zanetti, M. N. et al. Ring-like oligomers of Synaptotagmins and related C2 domain proteins. eLife5, e17262 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rothman, J. E., Krishnakumar, S. S., Grushin, K. & Pincet, F. Hypothesis – buttressed rings assemble, clamp, and release SNAREpins for synaptic transmission. FEBS Lett.591, 3459–3480 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bello, O. D. et al. Synaptotagmin oligomerization is essential for calcium control of regulated exocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, E7624–E7631 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ramakrishnan, S. et al. Synaptotagmin oligomers are necessary and can be sufficient to form a Ca2+-sensitive fusion clamp. FEBS Lett.593, 154–162 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tagliatti, E. et al. Synaptotagmin 1 oligomers clamp and regulate different modes of neurotransmitter release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA117, 3819–3827 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li, F. et al. Quantitative single-molecule analysis of assembly and Ca2+-dependent disassembly of synaptotagmin oligomers on lipid bilayers. Commun. Biol.7, 1608 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tran, H. T., Anderson, L. H. & Knight, J. D. Membrane-binding cooperativity and coinsertion by C2AB tandem domains of synaptotagmins 1 and 7. Biophys. J.116, 1025–1036 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bai, H. et al. Different states of synaptotagmin regulate evoked versus spontaneous release. Nat. Commun.7, 10.1038/ncomms10971 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 66.Bai, J., Earles, C. A., Lewis, J. L. & Chapman, E. R. Membrane-embedded synaptotagmin penetrates cis or trans target membranes and clusters via a novel mechanism. J. Biol. Chem.275, 25427–25435 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Vennekate, W. et al. Cis- and trans-membrane interactions of synaptotagmin-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA109, 11037–11042 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Prasad, R. & Zhou, H.-X. Membrane association and functional mechanism of synaptotagmin-1 in triggering vesicle fusion. Biophys. J.119, 1255–1265 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nyenhuis, S. B., Thapa, A. & Cafiso, D. S. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5 Bisphosphate Controls the cis and trans Interactions of Synaptotagmin 1. Biophys. J.117, 247–257 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bender, J. et al. Ca2+-dependent lipid preferences shape synaptotagmin-1 C2A and C2B dynamics: Insights from experiments and simulations. Structure32, 1691–1704.e1695 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Li, W. R. et al. Synaptotagmin-11 inhibits spontaneous neurotransmission through vti1a. J. Neurochem.159, 729–741 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Brandt, D. S., Coffman, M. D., Falke, J. J. & Knight, J. D. Hydrophobic contributions to the membrane docking of synaptotagmin 7 C2A domain: mechanistic contrast between isoforms 1 and 7. Biochemistry51, 7654–7664 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Voleti, R., Tomchick, D. R., Südhof, T. C. & Rizo, J. Exceptionally tight membrane-binding may explain the key role of the synaptotagmin-7 C2A domain in asynchronous neurotransmitter release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA114, E8518–E8527 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Courtney, K. C. et al. Synaptotagmin-7 outperforms synaptotagmin-1 to promote the formation of large, stable fusion pores via robust membrane penetration. Nat. Commun.14, 7761 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dai, H. et al. Structural basis for the evolutionary inactivation of Ca2+ binding to synaptotagmin 4. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.11, 844–849 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sugita, S., Shin, O. H., Han, W., Lao, Y. & Südhof, T. C. Synaptotagmins form a hierarchy of exocytotic Ca2+ sensors with distinct Ca2+ affinities. EMBO J.21, 270–280 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Xie, Z. et al. Molecular mechanisms for the coupling of endocytosis to exocytosis in neurons. Front. Mol. Neurosci.10, 47 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bilkova, E. et al. Calcium directly regulates phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate headgroup conformation and recognition. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 4019–4024 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chapman, E. R. How does synaptotagmin trigger neurotransmitter release? Annu. Rev. Biochem.77, 615–641 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ellenbroek, W. G. et al. Divalent cation-dependent formation of electrostatic PIP2 clusters in lipid monolayers. Biophys. J.101, 2178–2184 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sarmento, M. J., Coutinho, A., Fedorov, A., Prieto, M. & Fernandes, F. Ca2+ induces PI(4,5)P2 clusters on lipid bilayers at physiological PI(4,5)P2 and Ca2+ concentrations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr.1838, 822–830 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Toner, M., Vaio, G., McLaughlin, A. & McLaughlin, S. Adsorption of cations to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Biochemistry27, 7435–7443 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Eggermann, E., Bucurenciu, I., Goswami, S. P. & Jonas, P. Nanodomain coupling between Ca2+ channels and sensors of exocytosis at fast mammalian synapses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.13, 7–21 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lopes, J. P. & Cunha, R. A. What is the extracellular calcium concentration within brain synapses? J. Neurochem.149, 435–437 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Adler, E. M., Augustine, G. J., Duffy, S. N. & Charlton, M. P. Alien intracellular calcium chelators attenuate neurotransmitter release at the squid giant synapse. J. Neurosci.11, 1496–1507 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Yazejian, B., Sun, X. P. & Grinnell, A. D. Tracking presynaptic Ca2+ dynamics during neurotransmitter release with Ca2+-activated K+ channels. Nat. Neurosci.3, 566–571 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Llinás, R., Sugimori, M. & Silver, R. B. Microdomains of high calcium concentration in a presynaptic terminal. Science256, 677–679 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Roberts, W. M., Jacobs, R. A. & Hudspeth, A. J. Colocalization of ion channels involved in frequency selectivity and synaptic transmission at presynaptic active zones of hair cells. J. Neurosci.10, 3664–3684 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Madeira, F. et al. The EMBL-EBI Job Dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res.52, W521–W525 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gasteiger, E. et al. The Proteomics Protocols Handbook (ed John M. Walker) 571–607 (Humana Press, 2005).
  • 91.Hebditch, M., Carballo-Amador, M. A., Charonis, S., Curtis, R. & Warwicker, J. Protein–Sol: a web tool for predicting protein solubility from sequence. Bioinformatics33, 3098–3100 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Santos, K. B., Guedes, I. A., Karl, A. L. M. & Dardenne, L. E. Highly flexible ligand docking: benchmarking of the DockThor program on the LEADS-PEP protein–peptide data set. J. Chem. Inf. Model.60, 667–683 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 676–682 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hu, S. et al. STED imaging of vesicular endocytosis in the synapse. Neurosci. Bull.40, 1379–1395 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (338.2KB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (5MB, pdf)
Source Data (6MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All data presented in this study are either included in this article and its Supplemental Information or are available upon request to the corresponding author. Source data are provided with this paper.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES