Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1995 Apr;68(4):1347–1358. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80307-3

Charge selectivity of the designed uncharged peptide ion channel Ac-(LSSLLSL)3-CONH2.

P K Kienker 1, J D Lear 1
PMCID: PMC1282029  PMID: 7540427

Abstract

Charge selectivity in ion channel proteins is not fully understood. We have studied charge selectivity in a simple model system without charged groups, in which an amphiphilic helical peptide, Ac-(Leu-Ser-Ser-Leu-Leu-Ser-Leu)3-CONH2, forms ion channels across an uncharged phospholipid membrane. We find these channels to conduct both K+ and Cl-, with a permeability ratio (based on reversal potentials) that depends on the direction of the KCl concentration gradient across the membrane. The channel shows high selectivity for K+ when [KCl] is lowered on the side of the membrane that is held at a positive potential (the putative C-terminal side), but only modest K+ selectivity when [KCl] is lowered on the opposite side (the putative N-terminal side). Neither a simple Nernst-Planck electrodiffusion model including screening of the helix dipole potential, nor a multi-ion, state transition model allowing simultaneous cation and anion occupancy of the channel can satisfactorily fit the current-voltage curves over the full range of experimental conditions. However, the C-side/N-side dilution asymmetry in reversal potentials can be simulated with either type of model.

Full text

PDF
1347

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams D. J., Dwyer T. M., Hille B. The permeability of endplate channels to monovalent and divalent metal cations. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):493–510. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bek S., Jakobsson E. Brownian dynamics study of a multiply-occupied cation channel: application to understanding permeation in potassium channels. Biophys J. 1994 Apr;66(4):1028–1038. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80884-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blachly-Dyson E., Peng S., Colombini M., Forte M. Selectivity changes in site-directed mutants of the VDAC ion channel: structural implications. Science. 1990 Mar 9;247(4947):1233–1236. doi: 10.1126/science.1690454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borisova M. P., Brutyan R. A., Ermishkin L. N. Mechanism of anion-cation selectivity of amphotericin B channels. J Membr Biol. 1986;90(1):13–20. doi: 10.1007/BF01869681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bormann J., Hamill O. P., Sakmann B. Mechanism of anion permeation through channels gated by glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acid in mouse cultured spinal neurones. J Physiol. 1987 Apr;385:243–286. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bullock J. O., Kolen E. R., Shear J. L. Ion selectivity of colicin E1: II. Permeability to organic cations. J Membr Biol. 1992 May;128(1):1–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00231866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen D. P., Eisenberg R. S. Flux, coupling, and selectivity in ionic channels of one conformation. Biophys J. 1993 Aug;65(2):727–746. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81099-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen B. N., Labarca C., Czyzyk L., Davidson N., Lester H. A. Tris+/Na+ permeability ratios of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are reduced by mutations near the intracellular end of the M2 region. J Gen Physiol. 1992 Apr;99(4):545–572. doi: 10.1085/jgp.99.4.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen B. N., Labarca C., Davidson N., Lester H. A. Mutations in M2 alter the selectivity of the mouse nicotinic acetylcholine receptor for organic and alkali metal cations. J Gen Physiol. 1992 Sep;100(3):373–400. doi: 10.1085/jgp.100.3.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Edmonds D. T. Membrane ion channels and ionic hydration energies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1980 Dec 31;211(1182):51–62. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1980.0157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eisenman G., Horn R. Ionic selectivity revisited: the role of kinetic and equilibrium processes in ion permeation through channels. J Membr Biol. 1983;76(3):197–225. doi: 10.1007/BF01870364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fatima-Shad K., Barry P. H. Anion permeation in GABA- and glycine-gated channels of mammalian cultured hippocampal neurons. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Jul 22;253(1336):69–75. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Franciolini F., Nonner W. Anion and cation permeability of a chloride channel in rat hippocampal neurons. J Gen Physiol. 1987 Oct;90(4):453–478. doi: 10.1085/jgp.90.4.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Franciolini F., Petris A. Transport mechanisms in chloride channels. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Mar 26;1113(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(92)90031-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Galzi J. L., Devillers-Thiéry A., Hussy N., Bertrand S., Changeux J. P., Bertrand D. Mutations in the channel domain of a neuronal nicotinic receptor convert ion selectivity from cationic to anionic. Nature. 1992 Oct 8;359(6395):500–505. doi: 10.1038/359500a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Green W. N., Andersen O. S. Surface charges and ion channel function. Annu Rev Physiol. 1991;53:341–359. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.53.030191.002013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grenningloh G., Rienitz A., Schmitt B., Methfessel C., Zensen M., Beyreuther K., Gundelfinger E. D., Betz H. The strychnine-binding subunit of the glycine receptor shows homology with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nature. 1987 Jul 16;328(6127):215–220. doi: 10.1038/328215a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hall J. E., Vodyanoy I., Balasubramanian T. M., Marshall G. R. Alamethicin. A rich model for channel behavior. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):233–247. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84151-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoch D. H., Romero-Mira M., Ehrlich B. E., Finkelstein A., DasGupta B. R., Simpson L. L. Channels formed by botulinum, tetanus, and diphtheria toxins in planar lipid bilayers: relevance to translocation of proteins across membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Mar;82(6):1692–1696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.6.1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hol W. G. The role of the alpha-helix dipole in protein function and structure. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1985;45(3):149–195. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(85)90001-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Imoto K., Busch C., Sakmann B., Mishina M., Konno T., Nakai J., Bujo H., Mori Y., Fukuda K., Numa S. Rings of negatively charged amino acids determine the acetylcholine receptor channel conductance. Nature. 1988 Oct 13;335(6191):645–648. doi: 10.1038/335645a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Imoto K. Ion channels: molecular basis of ion selectivity. FEBS Lett. 1993 Jun 28;325(1-2):100–103. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81422-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kienker P. K., DeGrado W. F., Lear J. D. A helical-dipole model describes the single-channel current rectification of an uncharged peptide ion channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):4859–4863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kienker P., Tomaselli G., Jurman M., Yellen G. Conductance mutations of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor do not act by a simple electrostatic mechanism. Biophys J. 1994 Feb;66(2 Pt 1):325–334. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80781-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Konno T., Busch C., Von Kitzing E., Imoto K., Wang F., Nakai J., Mishina M., Numa S., Sakmann B. Rings of anionic amino acids as structural determinants of ion selectivity in the acetylcholine receptor channel. Proc Biol Sci. 1991 May 22;244(1310):69–79. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Langosch D., Hartung K., Grell E., Bamberg E., Betz H. Ion channel formation by synthetic transmembrane segments of the inhibitory glycine receptor--a model study. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Mar 18;1063(1):36–44. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(91)90350-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lear J. D., Wasserman Z. R., DeGrado W. F. Synthetic amphiphilic peptide models for protein ion channels. Science. 1988 May 27;240(4856):1177–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.2453923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lockhart D. J., Kim P. S. Electrostatic screening of charge and dipole interactions with the helix backbone. Science. 1993 Apr 9;260(5105):198–202. doi: 10.1126/science.8469972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Montal M., Mueller P. Formation of bimolecular membranes from lipid monolayers and a study of their electrical properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Dec;69(12):3561–3566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.12.3561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Myers V. B., Haydon D. A. Ion transfer across lipid membranes in the presence of gramicidin A. II. The ion selectivity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Aug 9;274(2):313–322. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90179-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Parsegian V. A. Ion-membrane interactions as structural forces. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Dec 30;264:161–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb31481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Raymond L., Slatin S. L., Finkelstein A. Channels formed by colicin E1 in planar lipid bilayers are large and exhibit pH-dependent ion selectivity. J Membr Biol. 1985;84(2):173–181. doi: 10.1007/BF01872215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Reddy G. L., Iwamoto T., Tomich J. M., Montal M. Synthetic peptides and four-helix bundle proteins as model systems for the pore-forming structure of channel proteins. II. Transmembrane segment M2 of the brain glycine receptor is a plausible candidate for the pore-lining structure. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jul 15;268(20):14608–14615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sansom M. S. The biophysics of peptide models of ion channels. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1991;55(3):139–235. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(91)90004-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sather W. A., Yang J., Tsien R. W. Structural basis of ion channel permeation and selectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994 Jun;4(3):313–323. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schofield P. R., Darlison M. G., Fujita N., Burt D. R., Stephenson F. A., Rodriguez H., Rhee L. M., Ramachandran J., Reale V., Glencorse T. A. Sequence and functional expression of the GABA A receptor shows a ligand-gated receptor super-family. Nature. 1987 Jul 16;328(6127):221–227. doi: 10.1038/328221a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Unwin N. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at 9 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1993 Feb 20;229(4):1101–1124. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Villarroel A., Sakmann B. Threonine in the selectivity filter of the acetylcholine receptor channel. Biophys J. 1992 Apr;62(1):196–208. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81805-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wada A. The alpha-helix as an electric macro-dipole. Adv Biophys. 1976:1–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang F., Imoto K. Pore size and negative charge as structural determinants of permeability in the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Oct 22;250(1327):11–17. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES