Abstract
Preparing for tomorrow’s threats by enhancing our ability to help patients today
For decades the focus of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID)’s research has been on the three areas of HIV, biodefense/pandemic preparedness, and all other immunological and infectious diseases combined into a single third category. NIAID’s new vision will refocus on the two related pillars of infectious diseases and immunology, opening wider areas for research into the challenges most relevant to keeping Americans healthy today.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the NIAID and its then-Director, Anthony Fauci, became for many the face of the pandemic response1. Though not directly under NIAID’s purview, many of the recommended policies, including lockdowns, social distancing, school closures, masking, and vaccine mandates, lacked robust confirmatory evidence and remain the subject of debate regarding their overall benefits and unintended consequences2. Where enforced, vaccine mandates contributed to decreased public confidence in routine voluntary immunizations3. We recognize that much of the American public lost trust in NIAID, the National Institutes of Health (of which NIAID is a part), and in the greater scientific community4.
As current leaders of the NIH and the NIAID, we acknowledge this breach of trust, but we remain committed to the idea that the scientific method used to generate valid, clinically relevant evidence can and must be applied to the continuing challenges of allergic, immunologic, and infectious diseases. These remain as important as ever to making America healthy. NIAID’s role is to develop and disseminate evidence by performing and funding meritorious research to address important biomedical questions, not in setting policy.
Over the past quarter century, NIAID’s overall strategic plan – which is being updated after almost a decade - had three main foci: (1) HIV research, including developing a vaccine or cure; (2) civilian biodefense and pandemic preparedness; and (3) all other priorities, including most infections and allergic, immunologic, and autoimmune conditions. To this end, we articulate here a new vision for the work of NIAID in the 21st Century. As infectious agents and immune responses and our understanding of them evolve, the research agenda should evolve to address their critical roles in maintaining human health and preventing or treating disease.
NIAID can point to considerable success in HIV.5 There are now safe, effective, and more convenient medications to prevent and treat HIV infection, thanks to NIAID-funded research, as well as numerous advances in basic science that have resulted in improved health. Yet HIV persists as an ongoing threat to Americans, with nearly 40,000 persons newly infected annually.6 On pandemic preparedness, no matter one’s position on the origin of SARS-CoV-2, NIAID’s work clearly neither prevented the pandemic nor prevented Americans from suffering among the highest levels of all-cause excess mortality in the developed world during that time7. Finally, given the increasing prevalence of allergic and autoimmune disorders and the burden of common infections in the population over the past decades,8 NIAID must focus research on these conditions with a greater sense of urgency.
Given these considerations, our vision for reforming NIAID is to replace these three strategic aims with just two: (1) to address the most impactful infectious diseases that Americans currently face with evidence from gold standard science; and (2) to support innovative research to address fundamental studies in immunology and allergic and autoimmune diseases to improve patient outcomes. (see Figure 1)
Figure 1.

An integrated, holistic approach to immunological and infectious disease research to improve human health.
Strategic aim 1: Support research to address important challenges in infectious diseases that affect Americans
A key part of NIAID’s portfolio will be to achieve progress in the aspirational goal first articulated by President Trump in his 2019 State of the Union speech: ending the HIV epidemic in the U.S. by the end of this decade. In the past year, key technological breakthroughs for the long-term prevention of HIV infection,9 based in large part on NIAID-funded research, provided tools to make progress towards accomplishing this aim. We should celebrate these tremendous achievements while we learn how to best apply those successes in real-world settings. Collaborating with other NIH institutes and partners10 we will expand research on how to implement tools to control HIV in the U.S. Concurrently, we will maintain a strong research and development pipeline for additional long-acting antiviral agents and other novel therapeutic and preventative strategies to complement this critical implementation research.
The second part of the NIAID portfolio will be improving patient outcomes in both acute and chronic infections, regardless of the type of microbe causing the disease. These infectious illnesses, in addition to HIV, substantially impact the health of Americans. While we cannot accurately predict future pandemics or novel infectious disease outbreaks, we can and must prepare for future events by renewing our focus on improving patient outcomes with common infections. These include disease from seasonal influenza viruses, arthropod-borne diseases, and common bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections, that collectively kill or cause morbidity in tens of thousands of Americans annually. These cause the greatest burdens of disease in patients today. We can best serve Americans, for example, by improving upon the suboptimal effectiveness of current influenza vaccine strategies.
We will place renewed emphasis on research in patients who experience antimicrobial resistance (AMR), by defining AMR as patients who have poor outcomes on current therapies, rather than solely on in vitro biological activity of drugs against specific organisms.11 NIH research shows that 94% of deaths and over 99% of serious infections are associated with organisms “susceptible” in vitro to currently available therapies. Yet these patients still experience poor outcomes as their disease is “resistant” in vivo to the effects of current drugs12 due to host factors and need for better rapid point-of-care diagnosis.
Focusing on patients who lack current effective therapies will open new areas of research on phage, microbiome, and host-directed therapies with the goal of improving overall patient outcomes. Overuse and misuse of antibiotics in humans and animals, underperforming diagnostics, and hospital-acquired infections still impact patients’ lives. NIAID will continue to focus on basic and clinical research to address these serious problems.
Third, NIAID will strictly adhere to new regulatory frameworks on dangerous Gain of Function (dGOF) research, as defined in President Trump’s Executive Order 14292, and which will be established by the Office of Science and Technology Policy. We will ensure that NIH-supported research follows the new guidelines, review processes, and prohibitions. While most infectious disease research poses no catastrophic threat to human populations, those projects that do will play no part in the NIAID portfolio going forward.
Strategic Aim 2: Support research addressing key problems in immunology and allergic and autoimmune disorders affecting Americans.
A better understanding of immune system development and homeostasis is the key to unlocking solutions for health, and many diseases Americans face. NIAID must support basic, applied, and clinical immunology research to address the ever-increasing chronic diseases from which Americans suffer. These include not only the short and long-term effects of infections, allergies, and autoimmunity, but also the immunopathology underlying common chronic diseases like heart disease, diabetes, and many other chronic diseases.
NIAID will foster research to better understand long-term post-infectious and non-infectious inflammatory syndromes, such as long COVID, chronic Lyme disease, myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, and adverse events following vaccination. This work will also extend to advancing scientific evidence on possible infectious triggers or contributors to other chronic diseases, such as Type 1 diabetes mellitus and multiple sclerosis. Such research supporting immunology and collaboration across institutes will dramatically improve our scientific understanding of all chronic diseases.
NIAID will expand work to identify the causes of allergic and autoimmune diseases, beginning in childhood and throughout life, focusing on prevention. While we continue research on treatment and management of these diseases, this new focus will identify ways to reduce the risk of their development and prevalence. This will also require further research to understand the critical role played by the human microbiome in the development and maintenance of the immune system and the consequences of microbiome alteration in health and disease13. A better understanding of the complexities of immune responses14 will also be needed to develop a new generation of safer and more effective therapeutics and vaccines15.
Ultimately, with these changes to the NIAID’s strategic aims, we will refocus the institute’s important research on areas currently impacting the American people. These priorities, in addition to the important ongoing and funded research portfolio, will collectively better prepare us for the future by driving basic, translational, and clinical research that addresses the health challenges in immunologic and infectious diseases that Americans face today.
Acknowledgements:
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, under Contract No. 75N91019D00024 Task Order No. 75N91019F00130.
Footnotes
Competing interest statement: none declared
References:
- 1.News B Anthony Fauci: The face of America’s fight against coronavirus. Vol. 2025 (BBC News, London, 2020). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jefferson T, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1, CD006207 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rains SA & Richards AS US state vaccine mandates did not influence COVID-19 vaccination rates but reduced uptake of COVID-19 boosters and flu vaccines compared to bans on vaccine restrictions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 121, e2313610121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Annenberg Public Policy Center. Public Confidence in U.S. Health Agencies Slides, Fueled by Declines Among Democrats. Vol. 2025 (Annenberg Public Policy Center, Philadelphia, 2025). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gandhi RT, et al. Antiretroviral Drugs for Treatment and Prevention of HIV in Adults: 2024 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel. JAMA 333, 609–628 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Force USPST, et al. Preexposure Prophylaxis to Prevent Acquisition of HIV: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 330, 736–745 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bor J, et al. Excess US Deaths Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Health Forum 6, e251118 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Conrad N, et al. Incidence, prevalence, and co-occurrence of autoimmune disorders over time and by age, sex, and socioeconomic status: a population-based cohort study of 22 million individuals in the UK. Lancet 401, 1878–1890 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Patel RR, et al. Clinical Recommendation for the Use of Injectable Lenacapavir as HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis - United States, 2025. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 74, 541–549 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Donenberg GR, et al. Harmonizing Implementation and Outcome Data Across HIV Prevention and Care Studies in Resource-Constrained Settings. Glob Implement Res Appl 2, 166–177 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Powers JH 3rd & Zuckerman DM Rethinking “Antimicrobial Resistance”: Focusing on Patients Instead of Pathogenic Organisms. Medical Research Archives 13(2025). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kadri SS, et al. Difficult-to-Treat Resistance in Gram-negative Bacteremia at 173 US Hospitals: Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcome of Resistance to All First-line Agents. Clin Infect Dis 67, 1803–1814 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hou K, et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7, 135 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alfonso-Gonzalez L, Fernandez FJ & Vega MC Systems immunology: When systems biology meets immunology. Front Immunol 16, 1630488 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gupta A, Rudra A, Reed K, Langer R & Anderson DG Advanced technologies for the development of infectious disease vaccines. Nat Rev Drug Discov 23, 914–938 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
