Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Jan 21;21(1):e0339464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339464

Paleo-proteomic analysis of Iron Age dental calculus provides direct evidence of Scythian reliance on ruminant dairy

Jaruschka Pecnik 1,2,*, Alicia R Ventresca Miller 3,4,5, Christian Panse 6,7, Laura Kunz 6, Antje Dittmann 6, James A Johnson 8, Sergey Makhortykh 9, Ludmilla Litvinova 9, Svetlana Andrukh 10, Gennady Toschev 10, Michael Krützen 11, Verena J Schuenemann 1,2,11,12,13, Shevan Wilkin 1,2,5,14,*
Editor: Branislav T Šiler15
PMCID: PMC12822928  PMID: 41563953

Abstract

The Scythians, often described as mounted horse-back warriors of the Iron Age steppe with lavish burial goods, have attracted increasing scientific interest over the past years. Recent genetic and multi-isotopic studies have uncovered that the ‘Scythians’ were neither a homogenous political nor a cultural group, but rather diverse populations of heterogeneous origins with intricate socio-political systems. Although populational differences in agro-pastoral subsistence regimes of Northern Black Sea Region groups have previously been identified through stable isotope analysis, it remains unclear which animal products were consumed. Here we investigate the dietary systems of two Scythian-era populations in present-day Ukraine using protein analysis of ancient dental calculus. Various dietary proteins and their taxonomic origin were identified revealing the consumption of milk from ruminant and equine species. This study supplements previous findings that Scythians engaged in complex, agro-pastoralist subsistence strategies in forest-steppe and steppe environments.

Introduction

During the Iron Age (ca. 700–200 cal. BCE), Scythian warriors occupied vast expanses of the Eurasian steppe, spanning from modern-day Hungary to the Altai mountains [1]. At multiple steppe sites, an ubiquitous prevalence of unique animal-style art (ASA) has been recovered, indicating unprecedented inter-regional interactions between Scythians [2]. However, detailed studies on ancient DNA, multi-isotopic analyses of Scythian populations, and well-established archaeological data have demonstrated that the notion of a Scythian “empire” [3] was actually composed of several heterogeneous groups of multiregional origins with differences in lifestyles, social stratifications, and subsistence strategies [411]. Hence, the shared motifs and artistic renditions of ASA that previously suggested nomadic forms of mobility [2], have been reconsidered as indications of regional separations [12]. Within these culturally and genetically distinct populations, Scythian-era groups likely had complex and varied subsistence systems and mobility strategies (ranging from highly mobile to sedentary), with hierarchical societies that included royals, farmers, and artisans. Some of these groups also interacted with neighbouring and distant populations, such as the Greeks, which is indicated by variety of cultural material findings such as pottery or gold objects in Scythian mounded burials (kurgans) and historical records [1,13,14].

The Eurasian steppe encompasses vast expanses of grasslands and is characterised by a continental climate, marked by hot summers and cold winters [15]. Across the steppe, different soil conditions and water resources built the basis of various forms of subsistence strategies and/ or combinations of hunter-gatherer, pastoral and agricultural lifestyles. For pastoralists, the vast grasslands offer ample sustenance for large herds resulting in access to primary (e.g., meat) and secondary animal products (e.g., milk) from livestock such as cattle, goats, sheep, and horses [14]. Since the Early Bronze Age (~ 3,000 BCE), fresh milk has provided a vital hydration resource on the arid environment and enabled steppe populations the conversion of inedible grasses into consumable milk products such as yoghurts and cheeses [1618]. Apart from the vast grasslands, the Eurasian steppe also contains regions (such as parts of present-day Ukraine and Kazakhstan) where crop cultivation occurs in areas with adequate precipitation or where irrigation is possible. Hence, in such regions, favourable climatic and environmental conditions like nutrient-rich soils [19] and easily accessible water sources [20] enabled some western steppe populations to practise horticulture or agriculture of crops such as wheat, barley, and millet [7]. Although most populations of the Scythian-era engaged in some form of agro-pastoralism supplemented by hunting and gathering [7,21], the particular species exploited for their food systems, especially milk and dairy products remain unknown, and may have varied between populations on the steppe and forest-steppe.

In present-day Ukraine, the sites Bilsk (ca. 700–200 cal. BCE) and Mamai-Gora (ca. 500–200 cal. BCE) (Fig 1) have been identified through historical records, (bio)archaeological findings, and multi-isotope analyses as two important political and economic centres of the Scythian “empire”, where inhabitants engaged in agro-pastoralism [7,2123]. In northeastern Ukraine, Bilsk is located within the border of forest-steppe and steppe environment and encompasses a huge area of approximately 5000 ha with channels and streams. Over 1000 burials were identified within (e.g., Cemetery B and Tsarina) and outside (e.g., Osnyagi 3rd Field, Pereschepino, and Marchenki 8th and 9th Fields) of the eastern and western fortification walls of Bilsk [19,24,25]. Archaeological findings and historical records indicate that this population consisted not only of a complex stratified social structure, but also operated as an important centre for political authority [19,26]. Several researchers link this site to the historical city Gelonus mentioned by Herodotus (490/480–424 BCE) and associate it with one of the Scythian kings’ centre of power [10,19,23,26,27]. Compared with Bilsk, Mamai-Gora is located in south-central Ukraine steppe environment on the left bank of the river Dnieper and has a rather dense necropolis with over 390 explored burials. The majority of the graves have been dated by archaeological material analyses and radiocarbon dating to between 500 and 300 BCE, whereas a few graves were testified to around 700–600 BCE [7,21,22,26,28].

Fig 1. World map with the location of the Scythian-era sites in the northern Black Sea region in present-day Ukraine.

Fig 1

The map was created using QGIS 3.42.3 [https://qgis.org/en/site/], the free vector and raster map data from Natural Earth [https://www.naturalearthdata.com/], and the coordinates from Google Maps [maps.google.com].

Despite a few stable isotopic analyses on Scythian-era communities that provided broad insights into dietary variation [7,21,29], there has been a marked lack of biomolecular studies that illuminate their dietary practices. Protein analysis from archaeological materials such as ceramic and metal vessels [3032] or bioarchaeological remains like dental calculus (mineralized dental plaque) [17,3336] can offer more detailed information about the species specific content of diets, recovered dietary proteins, and their taxonomic origins through the identification of amino acid sequences [3739]. Dental calculus is particularly well-suited for analysing past human diets, as its formation rapidly traps proteins from both the host and the surrounding environment, along with other biomolecules, micro-remains, and debris. This layered accumulation on the supra- and subgingival surfaces of teeth throughout an individual’s life provides valuable insights into subsistence strategies at both individual and populational level, revealing whether consumed foods were locally sourced or obtained through trade [17,18,3436,40,41].

To resolve more details about Scythian-era food systems, we report the first proteomic study of dental calculus of 28 individuals from the Scythian-era sites of Bilsk and Mamai-Gora located on in present-day Ukraine (Fig 1). Our results demonstrate that individuals at both sites consumed milk from ruminant herd animals, such as cattle, sheep, and goats. Additionally, horse milk consumption was identified in a single individual at Bilsk at the subsite Tsarina. Based on proteomic evidence of milk and dairy consumption, combined with established stable isotopic data of domestic grain production, we propose that these communities had diverse diets.

Results

We analysed 43 dental calculus samples (Bilsk: n = 21, Mamai-Gora: n = 22) from 28 individuals (Bilsk: n = 16, Mamai-Gora: n = 12, Table 1) excavated from six different Iron Age subsites at Bilsk (Cemetery B, Marchenki 8th and 9th Fields, Osnyagi 3rd Field, Pereschepino, and Tsarina) and Mamai-Gora (Fig 1). Five samples (201, 206, 207, 209, and 213) were replicated from their corresponding dental calculus deposits due to an inadequate oral signature to test whether the result was caused by an initially insufficient amount of material for protein extraction. However, even with an increased amount of dental calculus in most cases (S2 Table in S2 File), the proteomes of the replicated samples still did not exhibit an adequate oral signature and were therefore not analysed further (S3 Table in S2 File).

Table 1. Information about the recovered individuals from Bilsk and Mamai-Gora along with burial context and identified peptides extracted from dental calculus.

Excavation context, bioarchaeological information, and mobility identification Dietary protein analysis
Individual Site Subsite Sex Age estimation Locality of individual (Sr)* Identified proteins PSMs count Unique peptides Taxa identified
135 Bilsk Cemetery B M ~35 y _ 0 0
143 Bilsk Tsarina M 40 + y Locala BLG1, BLG, Alpha-S1-casein 18 11 Bovidae, Bovinae, Bovinae/Ovis, Caprinae, Ovis, Equus, unspecific
147 Bilsk Cemetery B M 30-35y Locala 0 0
151-152 Bilsk Marchenki 8th Field M 45 + y Locala Alpha-S1-casein 2 2 Bovidae, Bovinae
158 Bilsk Tsarina M 24-35y Born in Bilsk, moved away as adolescent and returned as an adulta 0 0
181-182 Bilsk Marchenki 9th Field F 45 + y Born outside of region and moved to Bilsk as a childa BLG, Alpha-S1-casein 7 6 Pecora, Bovidae, Bovinae, Bovinae/Ovis
185-186 Mamai-Gora M 20-35y Localb 0 0
192 Mamai-Gora F 30-45y Localb BLG 2 2 Bovinae, Bovinae/Ovis
200 Mamai-Gora M 21-35y Born and lived outside of Mamai-Gora until adolescenceb 0 0
203 Mamai-Gora F 18-21 y Localb BLG, BTN1A1, Alpha-S1-casein 11 9 Pecora, Bovidae, Bovinae, Bovinae/Ovis, unspecific (Mammalia)
220-221 Mamai-Gora M 40-50y Localb BLG, Alpha-S1-casein 10 7 Pecora, Bovidae, Bovinae, Bovinae/Ovis, Capra

More information about the samples and recovered dietary peptides can be found in S1 and S4 Tables in S2 File, respectively. * Interpretation based on strontium isotopic data (87Sr/86Sr).

aVentresca Miller et al., 2019

bVentresca Miller et al., 2021

Out of 43 samples from 28 individuals, the proteomes of only 15 samples from 11 individuals passed the oral signature assessment (Bilsk: n = 6, Mamai-Gora: n = 5) (S1 Fig in S1 File). Since the teeth had not been treated with consolidants and the extraction blanks processed alongside the samples in the dedicated clean laboratory were clean, the high failure rate was interpreted as reflecting variable preservation in the samples. Within the group of individuals who passed the oral signature authentication, a Wilcoxon rank-sum test showed a significant difference in total deamidation rates between contaminants and the group of oral cavity and dietary proteins (p = 1.1 × 10 ⁻ ⁵). In contrast, no significant difference was observed within the failed group (p = 0.3) (S2A Fig in S1 File). The deamidation rates of asparagine to aspartic acid (N2D) and glutamine to glutamic acid (Q2E), plotted from all proteomes that passed the oral signature assessment, showed higher deamidation rates for asparagine than for glutamine (S2B Fig in S1 File), consistent with the slower deamidation rate of glutamine compared to asparagine [42].

From the 11 individuals with an adequate oral signature, we recovered dietary proteins that derived from milk or dairy products in six individuals, from which three derived from Bilsk (Fig 2A) and three from Mamai-Gora (Fig 2B). Unfortunately, no other dietary proteins at distinct taxonomic levels were detected, limiting our ability to gain further insights into Scythian food systems. All of the results were correlated with excavation subsites and multi-isotopic data from previous publications, revealing insights into subsistence practices (Table 1) [7,2123,43].

Fig 2. Stacked bar plot of milk peptide spectrum matches (PSMs) per individual at Bilsk (A) and Mamai-Gora (B).

Fig 2

At both sites, a total of 50 peptide spectrum matches (PSMs) (Bilsk: 27, Mamai-Gora: 23) originating from the milk proteins Beta-lactoglobulin (BLG) and Beta-lactoglobulin-1 (BLG-1), Alpha-S1-casein, and the milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) protein Butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 (BTN1A1) were detected (S4 Table in S2 File). BLG was identified in 2 individuals from Bilsk: 143 (Tsarina, n = 9 PSMs) and 181–182 (Marchenki 9th, n = 4 PSMs), and in 3 individuals from Mamai-Gora: 192 (n = 2 PSMs), 203 (n = 5 PSMs), and 220–221 (n = 8 PSMs). In contrast, BLG-1 was identified exclusively in individual 143 from Bilsk (Tsarina, n = 7 PSMs). Alpha-S1-casein was identified in 3 individuals from Bilsk: 143 (Tsarina, n = 2 PSMs), 151–152 (Marchenki 8th, n = 2 PSMs), and 181–182 (Marchenki 9th, n = 3 PSMs), as well as in 2 individuals from Mamai-Gora: 203 (n = 4 PSMs) and 220–221 (n = 2 PSMs). While BTN1A1, was identified only in individual 203 (n = 2 PSMs) from Mamai-Gora (Fig 2).

Taxonomic assignments based on the identified milk peptide sequences included various ruminants and Equus (horse) (Figs 3A, 3B, and 3D), with the latter identified solely in the individual 143 from Bilsk (Tsarina) (Figs 3C and 3D). While the ruminant assignments of the identified milk peptides ranged from species-specific classifications, such as Ovis (sheep) and Capra (goat), to broader categories like the subfamilies Caprinae (e.g., sheep and goats) and Bovinae (e.g., cattle, yak, bison, water buffalo), the family Bovidae (e.g., cattle, sheep, and goats), and the higher infra-order Pecora (all even-toed mammals with ruminant digestion). The taxonomic grouping of “Caprinae and Capra” was specifically identified only at Tsarina (Bilsk) and Mamai-Gora, while “Pecora and Bovidae” and “Bovinae and/ or Ovis” were found at all sites. The latter grouping of bovines or sheep is reasoned by the aspartic acid (D) at the 6th position of the recovered BLG peptide TPEVDDEALEK which ambiguously can be identified as derived either from an unmodified bovine sequence or as a deamidated asparagine residue (N → D) of a sheep BLG peptide [44].

Fig 3. Taxonomic assignments of detected peptide spectrum matches (PSMs) in individuals from the two Scythian-era sites, Bilsk and Mamai-Gora.

Fig 3

Pie charts and total PSMs count of taxonomic assignments at Bilsk (A) and Mamai-Gora (B). (C) depicts one MS/MS fragmentation spectra from a horse peptide recovered from an individual from Tsarina, Bilsk. (C) shows a bar plot of the taxonomic assignments of PSMs at the different subsites in Bilsk. For visualisation purposes, taxonomic assignments were summarised when the grouping did not exclude taxonomic specification, i.e., Pecora and Bovidae”, “Bovinae and/ or Ovis”, and “Caprinae and Capra”.

Discussion

Scythian-era societies were neither homogeneously sedentary nor always mobile, instead engaging in intricate forms of social interaction, societal structures, and subsistence regimes. Along with established archaeological and stable isotopic evidence of dietary practices [7,12,14,21], this paleo-proteomic study of dental calculus supports findings of complex subsistence economies with the identification of milk proteins derived from ruminants and horses, indicating a diverse set of agro-pastoral lifeways of Scythian populations on the Western Steppe in steppe and forest-steppe environment. However, it must be noted that an absence of certain dietary proteins in the recovered dental calculus proteomes does not mean that the corresponding individuals did not consume these foods. The incorporation, preservation, and detection of proteins in dental calculus is affected by several factors such the process and timing of calculus formation, food or beverage consistency (solid or liquid), the processing methods of dietary products, burial contexts, and the degradation of proteins over time [17,35,45]. As such, we can only comment on the presence, rather than an absence of particular taxa or tissues.

As with other steppe groups, milk was a crucial dietary resource for Scythians, as it provided a consistent, renewable, and moveable source of hydration and nutrients in the form of raw milk and processed dairy products, prior to and beyond the Iron Age [7,17,46]. Importantly, in fresh ruminant milk, casein outweighs the whey fraction (e.g., 1.1:1 in equines, 4.7:1 in bovines, and ~3.3:1 in caprines) [47,48]. This is further compounded during the processing of milk into other products where whey is removed. Overall, the ratios of casein and whey proteins found in fresh milk are not reflected in our ancient protein analysis, which is consistent with a common pattern in paleo-proteomic studies of dental calculus [17,33,34,36,40,49]. Even though the enduring survival of BLG and inverse ratio of whey and casein proteins in modern and preserved findings is still questioned [42], it can likely be explained by the complex and globular molecular structure of BLG in comparison to the simpler secondary structures of casein proteins [50]. The complex and tightly bound structure of BLG presumably allows for much of the protein sequence to be less susceptible to denaturation induced by environmental factors like temperature or enzymatic attack, which properties may lead to the preservation of the protein sequences over a long period of time [45,50]. In contrast to whey and casein proteins, milk-fat-globule membrane (MFGM) proteins represent only a small fraction (~1%) of the total protein count in milk [47]. To our knowledge, we have provided the first paleo-proteomic evidence of BTN1A1 in dental calculus, as MFGM peptides have so far only been detected in archaeological material such as ceramic vessels [30], grass woven baskets [51], and preserved ancient cheese [52].

Apart from the ruminant-derived milk proteins, horse milk proteins (Beta-lactoglobulin 1) were only identified in a single individual at Bilsk (Tsarina: 143). Although the domestication and economic uses of horses have been documented before the emergence of the Scythians in the Iron Age [53,54], this presents the first direct biomolecular evidence that the Scythians included horse-derived products in their diet. Possible evidence of horse milk consumption on the Eurasian steppe has been presented in the form of fatty acids as organic residues in ceramics from Botai in northern Kazakhstan [55] as well as, more recently, proteomic evidence found in dental calculus of western steppe dwellers from the Early Bronze Age Pontic-Caspian region [18] and those from the Late Bronze Age to the Mongol Empire (and into today) on the far eastern steppe in Mongolia [17,56].

Horses were clearly an integral part of the economic, political, and cultural life across the diverse range of Scythian populations as evidenced by findings of equestrian accoutrements, equine skeletal remains, and intricate horse-style craftworks included in burials [1,9,14,57,58]. According to historical records, the Scythians used horses not only for facilitated transportation, complex warfare, and as symbolic entities in their belief system, but also for milk and meat production. In these literary sources, the Scythians are even referred to as mare’s milk drinking tribes that also consumed the alcoholic fermented horse milk beverage “koumiss” [14]. However, how widespread the practice was among the varied Scythian-associated communities is unclear. With the lack of evidence for horse milk consumption in most individuals from the current study, it is possible that access to koumiss was limited to those with cultural or political power. It could also be argued that the Scythians divided the functionality of their livestock according to the differential needs in animal husbandry, with horses serving a special purpose in society, used for riding and as pack animals, rather than for dietary purposes. While our contextualisation of scarce mare’s milk consumption in the wider Scythian range of influence remains speculative, further archaeological and biomolecular data from a wider portion of Scythian-era populations can help to clarify disparities between social, cultural, and political structures.

Conclusion

Our paleo-proteomic study of dietary foods consumed by Scythian populations provides new insights into the diverse subsistence strategies of communities in Iron Age Ukraine. Our proteomic evidence of mixed dairy pastoralism, supports previously published stable isotopic and archaeological data. Based on the recovered milk proteins, our data demonstrates that ruminant milk was consumed across the Northern Black Sea Region among Iron Age steppe populations. The scarce mare’s milk protein recovery could be interpreted as Scythian-era populations were primarily focused on riding or traction-focused horse herds that were not milked, or that there were hierarchical divisions affecting access to certain foods.

For upcoming studies, we propose to increase the overall number of Iron Age study individuals from Scythian-era populations in order to conduct a more thorough proteomic analysis of individuals from both urban and more ephemeral pastoral sites across steppe and forest-steppe regions. In addition, a comparison of proteomic data between different Scythians populations, as well against those of other steppe peoples may reveal differences in diet, such as the consumption of mare’s milk. An extension of additional biomolecular archaeological methods, such as ancient DNA and lipid analysis on bioarchaeological and archaeological material, but also the analysis of micro-remains in dental calculus can provide more detailed information and further clarify consistencies and differences in food systems across Scythian-era populations.

Methods

Sample collection and extraction

Dental calculus samples from the individuals excavated from Bilsk and Mamai-Gora were collected at the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Kyiv under the permission of a signed “Agreement Concerning Scientific Collaboration”. The project was approved by the Director of the Institute of Archaeology of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. Originally, the study protocol did not include analysis of human dental calculus, but approvals were subsequently received from respective parties. Additional information regarding the ethical, cultural, and scientific considerations specific to inclusivity in global research is included in the Supporting Information (S3 File).

From the individuals with dental calculus, between 1 mg to 15 mg dental calculus powder or chunks were sampled and stored in Eppendorf tubes. Protein extractions were conducted in a dedicated, clean protein laboratory facility according to the Single-Pot, Solid-Phase, Sample-Preparation (SP3) protocol [59], at University of Zurich (UZH). Each sample batch included one extraction blank as a negative control. Prior to measurement using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) at the Functional Genomics Centre Zurich (FGCZ), the samples were adjusted through dilution to a peptide concentration up to 0.03 µg/µl (S1 and S2 Tables in S2 File).

Proteomic measurements

Mass spectrometry analysis was performed in the Functional Genomics Centre of Zürich (FGCZ) based on instrument availability on either the Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a Digital PicoView source (New Objective) or on the Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a Nanospray Flex Ion Source (Thermo Fisher Scientific), both coupled to an M-Class UPLC (Waters). In each instrument, solvent composition at the two channels was 0.1% formic acid for channel A and 0.1% formic acid, 99.9% acetonitrile for channel B. Column temperature was at 50°C. For each sample 2–5 μL of peptides were loaded on a commercial ACQUITY UPLC M-Class Symmetry C18 Trap Column (100Å, 5 µm, 180 µm x 20 mm, Waters) followed by ACQUITY UPLC M-Class HSS T3 Column (100Å, 1.8 µm, 75 µm X 250 mm, Waters) on the Q Exactive HF or on a commercial nanoEase MZ Symmetry C18 Trap Column (100Å, 5 µm, 180 µm x 20 mm, Waters) followed by a nanoEase MZ C18 HSS T3 Column (100Å, 1.8 µm, 75 µm x 250 mm, Waters) on the Orbitrap Exploris 480. The peptides were eluted at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. For measurement on the Q Exactive HF, after a 3 min initial hold at 5% B, a gradient from 5 to 22% B in 50 min and 22–40% B in additional 10 min was applied. For measurement on Orbitrap Exploris 480, after a 3 min initial hold at 5% B, a gradient from 5 to 22% B in 80 min and 22–32% B in additional 10 min was applied. The column was cleaned after the run by increasing to 95% B and holding 95% B for 10 min prior to re-establishing loading condition. All samples were measured in randomised order.

Q Exactive HF.

The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode with a maximum cycle time of 3 s, using Xcalibur (tune version: 4.4), with spray voltage set to 2.3 kV, funnel RF level at 60%, and heated capillary temperature at 275 °C. Full-scan MS spectra (350 − 1’500 m/z) were acquired at a resolution of 120’000 at 200 m/z after accumulation to an automated gain control (AGC) target value of 100’000 or for a maximum injection time of 100 ms. Precursors with an intensity above 45’000 were selected for MS/MS. Ions were isolated using a quadrupole mass filter with a 1.2 m/z isolation window and fragmented by higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) using a normalised collision energy of 28%. MS2 spectra were recorded at a resolution of 30’000 and a maximum injection time of 50 ms. Charge state screening was enabled, and singly, unassigned charge states and charge states higher than seven were excluded. Precursor masses previously selected for MS/MS measurement were excluded from further selection for 30 s, applying a mass tolerance of 10 ppm. The samples were acquired using internal lock mass calibration on m/z 371.1012 and 445.1200.

Orbitrap Exploris 480.

The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode with a maximum cycle time of 3 s, using Xcalibur (tune version: 4.4), with spray voltage set to 2.3 kV, funnel RF level at 40%, heated capillary temperature at 275 °C, and Advanced Peak Determination (APD) on. Full-scan MS spectra (350 − 1’200 m/z) were acquired at a resolution of 120’000 at 200 m/z after accumulation to a target value of 3’000’000 or for a maximum injection time of 45 ms. Precursors with an intensity above 5’000 were selected for MS/MS. Ions were isolated using a quadrupole mass filter with a 1.2 m/z isolation window and fragmented by higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) using a normalised collision energy of 30%. HCD spectra were acquired at a resolution of 30’000 and maximum injection time was set to Auto. The automatic gain control (AGC) was set to 100’000 ions. Charge state screening was enabled such that singly, unassigned and charge states higher than six were rejected. Precursor masses previously selected for MS/MS measurement were excluded from further selection for 20 s, and the exclusion window was set at 10 ppm. The samples were acquired using internal lock mass calibration on m/z 371.1012 and 445.1200.

The mass spectrometry proteomics data were handled using the local laboratory information management system (LIMS) [60].

Data analysis

The raw MS/MS data files (.raw) were converted to Mascot generic files (.mgf) to be searched via in the Mascot daemon program (www.matrixscience.com, version: 2.7.0.1) [61] using the database from Wilkin and colleagues [62], which is compiled of the entirety of Swiss-Prot (downloaded: April 2021) combined with a custom dairy database used in previously published studies of steppe dairy populations [17,18,62]. The Mascot search included the following settings: carbamidomethylation of cysteine (C) as a fixed modification, and deamidation of asparagine and glutamine (N and Q) and oxidation of methionine (M) as variable modification. The instrument was set as QExactive, with precursor ions mass tolerance at 10 ppm, with allowances for one isotopic mass shift, and fragment ion mass tolerance at 0.01 Da. Trypsin was selected as the enzyme, and we allowed up to 3 missed cleavages per peptide and included peptides with charges of 2 + , 3 + , and 4 + .

The Mascot results were filtered using the custom-made R script MS-MARGE.R (Freely available at: https://bitbucket.org/rwhagan/ms-marge/src/master/) [17,63], which resulted in three output files: a CSV file of filtered peptide spectrum matches (PSM), a FASTA file of the results, and an HTML file that contains information on false discovery rate (FDR) and filtered protein PSM counts. MS-MARGE.R contains adjustable filtering parameters for the minimum PSM count per protein and e-value cut-off (the default values used are >=2 and 0.01, respectively). Samples that failed to meet the false-discovery rate thresholds, by means protein FDR > 5% and peptide FDR > 2%, were excluded from further analysis. The false discovery rates for the samples that were further analyzed for their dietary content ranged for protein from 0–3.76% and for peptide from 0–1.16%, respectively.

To further validate all dietary PSMs with a Mascot ion score below 40, we applied the same strategy for spectral angle validation as conducted by Wilkin and colleagues in Review [64]. We compared each spectrum after removal of the precursor ion peak with the corresponding `AlphaPept_ms_generic` [65] fragment-ion prediction model using R (version 4.5.1), Bioconductor (version 3.19), and the koinar package [66,67]. For this, we used the model parameters of QE for Thermo Fischer Scientific (TFS) QExactive mass spectrometer and of 28eV for the collision energy (CE) setting. The spectral data was extracted from the TFS generated raw files using the rawrr package [68]. We considered PSMs without methionine or proline modification (Unimod:35) with spectral angle Pearson scores >= 0.70 as positively identified peptides, whereas PSMs with these modifications had to reach a threshold of >=0.60 for incorporation in the study. The latter adapted threshold is due to the limited prediction power with respect to post-translational modifications in current prediction models [64]. Based on spectral angle Pearson scores and minimum PSM count per protein (>=2), a total of six dietary PSMs had to be excluded from this study (S4 Table in S2 File).

Assessment of oral signature for sample authentication

To assess the oral signature of the recovered dental calculus proteomes, we screened all of them for the presence of oral signature proteins, e.g., host-expressed salivary proteins and oral microbiome, and common and lab contaminants [44]. Similar as in the study of Ventresca Miller and colleagues (2023), we did not perform the database search against the Oral Signature Screening Database (OSSD) from Bleasdale, Boivin, and Richter (2021) [44,49], but rather searched within the filtered data from our searches in Mascot using an adapted version of the OSSD entries. We identified in each proteome the presence of peptide-spectrum matches (PSM) that match to oral signature proteins (oral microbiome and salivary proteins) and contaminants (common environmental and laboratory contaminants). These four databases are compiled out of previous publications [44,69,70]. For our authentication score, we divided for each proteome the oral signature PSM counts by the sum of the oral and contaminant PSM counts. These resulting scores were min-max normalized for better comparison across them. Based on the visual inspection of each proteome and the comparison of the oral and contaminant PSM counts within the whole dataset, the threshold to pass as an authentic sample was set to 0.5. In case two proteomes from the same individual passed with an authentic oral signature, their raw MS/MS data were merged (name resulted from the combination of the single sample numbers with a hyphen) and followingly, the database search, proteomic pre-processing and oral signature assessment was repeated. Exclusively, single or merged samples that successfully passed this workflow were further analysed (S3 Table in S2 File).

In addition, a bulk deamidation analysis of asparagine and glutamine was conducted to assess possible indications of age-induced degradation [38]. For this, we compared the deamidation rates in proteins matching the laboratory and common contaminant database with those matching the oral cavity (oral microbiome and host proteins) and dietary proteins. To compare total deamidation rates between contaminants and the group of oral cavity and dietary proteins, we performed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests separately within the groups of individuals who passed and failed the oral signature authentication. Data processing, statistical testing, and visualisations were performed in R (version 4.5.1) using the packages tidyverse [71] and ggpubr [72].

Assessment of taxonomic assignments of dietary proteins

All PSMs that were identified in the Mascot search as derived from dietary proteins were further authenticated in a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST, edition: BLAST+ 2.12.0). In this search, the peptide sequences of interest were searched against the BLAST database of all known and hypothetical sequences in a non-redundant protein sequences (nr) database with the algorithm protein-protein BLAST (blastp). Only unique hits to taxa were assessed, whereas certain dairy peptides align to hypothetical protein sequences of bacteria species, e.g., Alpha-S1-casein peptides align with hypothetical proteins of Jeotgalicoccus coquina (WP_229715011), Jeotgalicoccus aerolatus (WP_231957245), and Phocicoccus schoeneichii (WP_229713947). As discussed by Wilkin and colleagues (2021), such theoretical hits are assumed to be derived from contaminations during the genome sequencing because of their high sequence similarities [18]. In addition, certain peptides from Beta-lactoglobulin also align with the lipocalin/fatty-acid binding family protein from Staphylococcus aureus (MBO8907834), since this predicted sequence derived from protein homology and we recovered several Beta-lactoglobulin peptides that were exclusively identified from various ruminant species, we counted these hits as Beta-lactoglobulin peptides. All figures were created in R (version 4.5.1) using the packages tidyverse [71], cowplot [73], and MetBrewer [74].

Supporting information

S1 File. Oral signature heatmaps of individuals from Bilsk and Mamai-Gora and bulk deamidation rates of asparagine and glutamine of proteomes that passed and failed the oral signature assessment.

(DOCX)

pone.0339464.s001.docx (386KB, docx)
S2 File. Sample information, details on extraction and measurement method of samples, oral signature assessment, and dietary peptide spectrum matches.

(XLSX)

pone.0339464.s002.xlsx (36.4KB, xlsx)
S3 File. Inclusivity in global research.

(DOCX)

pone.0339464.s003.docx (67.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

Dr. Ludmilla Litvinova cannot be contacted as of the time of the article’s publication. The corresponding author vouches for her contributions to the work as reported in the article and is unaware of potential competing interests for Dr. Ludmilla Litvinova that would have impacted or been relevant to this work. This work was supported by the University of Zurich’s University Research Priority Program “Evolution in Action: From Genomes to Ecosystems” (S.W., V.J.S).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files except for mass spectrometry proteomics data, which is publicly accessible on MassIVE (massive.ucsd.edu; MSV000092635).

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Cunliffe B. The Scythians: Nomad Warriors of the Steppe. Oxford University Press. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Simpson SJ, Pankova S. Scythian warriors of ancient Siberia. London: The British Museum. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beckwith CI. The Scythian Empire: Central Eurasia and the Birth of the Classical Age from Persia to China. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Damgaard P de B, Marchi N, Rasmussen S, Peyrot M, Renaud G, Korneliussen T, et al. 137 ancient human genomes from across the Eurasian steppes. Nature. 2018;557(7705):369–74. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0094-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gnecchi-Ruscone GA, Khussainova E, Kahbatkyzy N, Musralina L, Spyrou MA, Bianco RA, et al. Ancient genomic time transect from the Central Asian Steppe unravels the history of the Scythians. Sci Adv. 2021;7(13):eabe4414. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe4414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Juras A, Krzewińska M, Nikitin AG, Ehler E, Chyleński M, Łukasik S, et al. Diverse origin of mitochondrial lineages in Iron Age Black Sea Scythians. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43950. doi: 10.1038/srep43950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ventresca Miller AR, Johnson J, Makhortykh S, Gerling C, Litvinova L, Andrukh S, et al. Re-evaluating Scythian lifeways: Isotopic analysis of diet and mobility in Iron Age Ukraine. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0245996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murphy EM, Schulting R, Beer N, Chistov Y, Kasparov A, Pshenitsyna M. Iron Age pastoral nomadism and agriculture in the eastern Eurasian steppe: implications from dental palaeopathology and stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes. J Archaeol Sci. 2013;40(5):2547–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Parzinger H. Die skythen. C.H. Beck. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Unterländer M, Palstra F, Lazaridis I, Pilipenko A, Hofmanová Z, Groß M, et al. Ancestry and demography and descendants of Iron Age nomads of the Eurasian Steppe. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14615. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Маkhortykh SV. Concerning the Problem of Identifying the Sсythian Centers of Power in Eastern Europe In The VII—VI centuries BC. journal. 2019;33(4):74–9. doi: 10.37445/adiu.2019.04.04 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.MacFarland K. Cycles of historical inquiry: evaluating the historical paradigm of nomadism in Iron Age north central Eurasia. World Archaeology. 2018;50(5):748–63. doi: 10.1080/00438243.2019.1604259 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Burghardt M. Social stratification of the population of the forest-steppe area of the Dnieperland in the Early Scythian period (VII – first half of VI cent. BC). Spraw Archeol. 2017;69:133–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rolle R. The World of the Scythians. University of California Press. 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bendrey R. Some like it hot: environmental determinism and the pastoral economies of the later prehistoric Eurasian steppe. Pastor Res Policy Pract. 2011;1(1):8. doi: 10.1186/2041-7136-1-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scott A, Reinhold S, Hermes T, Kalmykov AA, Belinskiy A, Buzhilova A, et al. Emergence and intensification of dairying in the Caucasus and Eurasian steppes. Nat Ecol Evol. 2022;6(6):813–22. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01701-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wilkin S, Ventresca Miller A, Taylor WTT, Miller BK, Hagan RW, Bleasdale M, et al. Dairy pastoralism sustained eastern Eurasian steppe populations for 5,000 years. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020;4(3):346–55. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1120-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wilkin S, Ventresca Miller A, Fernandes R, Spengler R, Taylor WT-T, Brown DR, et al. Dairying enabled Early Bronze Age Yamnaya steppe expansions. Nature. 2021;598(7882):629–33. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03798-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zöllner H, Ulrich B, Rolle R, Makhortykh S, Orlyuk M. Results of geophysical prospection in the Scythian settlement of Belsk (Bol’šoe Belskoe Gorodišče). In: Posluschny A, Lambers K, Herzog I, editors. Layers of Perception: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wendelken RW. Horses and Gold: The Scythians of the Eurasian Steppes. The Role of Migration in the History of the Eurasian Steppe. Palgrave Macmillan US. 2000:189–206. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-61837-8_10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ventresca Miller AR, Johnson JA, Makhortykh S, Litvinova L, Taylor T, Rolle R, et al. Mobility and diet in the Iron Age Pontic forest‐steppe: A multi‐isotopic study of urban populations at Bel’sk. Archaeometry. 2019;61(6):1399–416. doi: 10.1111/arcm.12493 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Andrukh SI, Toschev GN. Mamai-Gora Cemetery. Zaporizhzhya National University. 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shramko BA. Bel’sk an ancient settlement of the Scythian epoch (the city of Gelon). Naukova Dumka. 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Makhortykh S. History of research of the kurgan necropolises of the Belsk hillfort. The Early Iron Age. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Makhortykh S. Burial structures and rite of the barrow necropoleis of the Bel’sk hillfort. Strat Plus J. 2013;2013(3). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Järve M, Saag L, Scheib CL, Pathak AK, Montinaro F, Pagani L, et al. Shifts in the Genetic Landscape of the Western Eurasian Steppe Associated with the Beginning and End of the Scythian Dominance. Curr Biol. 2019;29(14):2430–2441.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rolle R. The Scythians: Between mobility, tomb architecture, and early urban structures. In: Bonfante L, editor. The Barbarians of Ancient Europe: Realities and Interactions. Cambridge University Press. 2011:107–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yatsenko SA. Planigraphy of the Scythian Cemetery of Mamai-Gora. In: Filjuk O, editor. Antiquities of Steppe Black Sea Region and Crimea. CUL. 2017:306. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gerling C. Prehistoric mobility and diet in the West Eurasian steppes 3500 to 300 BC: An isotopic approach. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hendy J, Colonese AC, Franz I, Fernandes R, Fischer R, Orton D, et al. Ancient proteins from ceramic vessels at Çatalhöyük West reveal the hidden cuisine of early farmers. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4064. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06335-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tanasi D, Cucina A, Cunsolo V, Saletti R, Di Francesco A, Greco E, et al. Paleoproteomic profiling of organic residues on prehistoric pottery from Malta. Amino Acids. 2021;53(2):295–312. doi: 10.1007/s00726-021-02946-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wilkin S, Hommel P, Ventresca Miller A, Boivin N, Pedergnana A, Shishlina N, et al. Curated cauldrons: Preserved proteins from early copper-alloy vessels illuminate feasting practices in the Caucasian steppe. iScience. 2023;26(9):107482. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Charlton S, Ramsøe A, Collins M, Craig OE, Fischer R, Alexander M. New insights into Neolithic milk consumption through proteomic analysis of dental calculus. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2019;11(11):6183–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Geber J, Tromp M, Scott A, Bouwman A, Nanni P, Grossmann J, et al. Relief food subsistence revealed by microparticle and proteomic analyses of dental calculus from victims of the Great Irish Famine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(39):19380–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908839116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hendy J, Warinner C, Bouwman A, Collins MJ, Fiddyment S, Fischer R, et al. Proteomic evidence of dietary sources in ancient dental calculus. Proc Biol Sci. 2018;285(1883):20180977. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Warinner C, Hendy J, Speller C, Cappellini E, Fischer R, Trachsel C, et al. Direct evidence of milk consumption from ancient human dental calculus. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7104. doi: 10.1038/srep07104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Buckley M. Paleoproteomics: An Introduction to the Analysis of Ancient Proteins by Soft Ionisation Mass Spectrometry. Population Genomics. Springer International Publishing. 2018:31–52. doi: 10.1007/13836_2018_50 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hendy J. Ancient protein analysis in archaeology. Sci Adv. 2021;7(3):eabb9314. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb9314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Warinner C, Korzow Richter K, Collins MJ. Paleoproteomics. Chem Rev. 2022;122(16):13401–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Soncin S, Hendy J, Speller C, Manzi G, Tafuri MA. Diet and health in middle bronze age Italy: a metaproteomic analysis of human dental calculus in two case-studies. In: Pap Present IMEKO Int Conf Metrol Archaeol Cult Herit Torino Italy, 2016. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/107287/ [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Warinner C, Speller C, Collins MJ. A new era in palaeomicrobiology: prospects for ancient dental calculus as a long-term record of the human oral microbiome. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1660):20130376. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ramsøe A, Crispin M, Mackie M, McGrath K, Fischer R, Demarchi B, et al. Assessing the degradation of ancient milk proteins through site-specific deamidation patterns. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1). Available from: doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87125-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Makhortykh S, Rolle R. Some results of the investigation of the Bel’sk hillfort and its suburbs held by the Ukrainian-German expedition. Archaeol Chron Dnieper Left-Bank Ukr. 2006;2–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ventresca Miller AR, Wilkin S, Bayarsaikhan J, Ramsøe A, Clark J, Byambadorj B, et al. Permafrost preservation reveals proteomic evidence for yak milk consumption in the 13th century. Commun Biol. 2023;6(1):351. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04723-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hendy J, Welker F, Demarchi B, Speller C, Warinner C, Collins MJ. A guide to ancient protein studies. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018;2(5):791–9. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kuzmina EE. The Prehistory of the Silk Road. In: Mair VH, editor. The Prehistory of the Silk Road. University of Pennsylvania Press. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fox PF, Uniacke-Lowe T, McSweeney PLH, O’Mahony JA. Milk Proteins. Dairy Chemistry and Biochemistry. Springer International Publishing. 2015:145–239. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14892-2_4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Uniacke-Lowe T, Huppertz T, Fox PF. Equine milk proteins: Chemistry, structure and nutritional significance. International Dairy Journal. 2010;20(9):609–29. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2010.02.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bleasdale M, Richter KK, Janzen A, Brown S, Scott A, Zech J, et al. Ancient proteins provide evidence of dairy consumption in eastern Africa. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):632. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20682-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Palmer KS, Makarewicz CA, Tishkin AA, Tur SS, Chunag A, Diimajav E, et al. Comparing the Use of Magnetic Beads with Ultrafiltration for Ancient Dental Calculus Proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2021;20(3):1689–704. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Xie M, Shevchenko A, Wang B, Shevchenko A, Wang C, Yang Y. Identification of a dairy product in the grass woven basket from Gumugou Cemetery (3800 BP, northwestern China). Quat Int. 2016;426:158–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yang Y, Shevchenko A, Knaust A, Abuduresule I, Li W, Hu X. Proteomics evidence for kefir dairy in Early Bronze Age China. J Archaeol Sci. 2014;45:178–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Librado P, Khan N, Fages A, Kusliy MA, Suchan T, Tonasso-Calvière L, et al. The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes. Nature. 2021;598(7882):634–40. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04018-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Taylor WTT, Clark J, Bayarsaikhan J, Tuvshinjargal T, Jobe JT, Fitzhugh W, et al. Early Pastoral Economies and Herding Transitions in Eastern Eurasia. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61080-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Outram AK, Stear NA, Bendrey R, Olsen S, Kasparov A, Zaibert V, et al. The earliest horse harnessing and milking. Science. 2009;323(5919):1332–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1168594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ventresca Miller AR, Wilkin S, Hendy J, Turbat T, Batsukh D, Bayarkhuu N, et al. The spread of herds and horses into the Altai: How livestock and dairying drove social complexity in Mongolia. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0265775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Makhortykh S. Horse harness of the Scythian period in the Vorskla basin (based on the materials of Bels’k hillfort cemeteries). Archaeol Early Hist Ukr. 2010;4:55–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Makhortykh S, Rolle R. Images of detached animal paw and human hand in the art of steppe and forest-steppe Scythia. Strat Plus J. 2015;2015(3). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wilkin S, Hagan R, Hebestreit S, Bleasdale M, Nayak A, Tang L. Protein Extraction for Dental Calculus. Nature Communications. 2021;3:1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Türker C, Akal F, Joho D, Panse C, Barkow-Oesterreicher S, Rehrauer H. B-Fabric: The Swiss Army Knife for Life Sciences. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, 2010. 717–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999;20(18):3551–67. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wilkin S, Lanigan LT, Montes N, Sharma M, Avanzi C, Sejdiu D, et al. Sequential trypsin and ProAlanase digestions unearth immunological protein biomarkers shrouded by skeletal collagen. iScience. 2024;27(5):109663. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hagan R. MS-MARGE. https://bitbucket.org/rwhagan/ms-marge/src/master/. 2018.
  • 64.Wilkin S, Grossmann J, Reynard J, Dekker JAA, Wiessner P, Carleton C. Residues of daily life: proteomics of accumulations on archaeological African Holocene beads. Nature Ecology & Evolution. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zeng W-F, Zhou X-X, Willems S, Ammar C, Wahle M, Bludau I, et al. AlphaPeptDeep: a modular deep learning framework to predict peptide properties for proteomics. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):7238. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34904-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lautenbacher L, Yang KL, Kockmann T, Panse C, Chambers M, Kahl E, et al. Koina: Democratizing machine learning for proteomics research. bioRxiv. 2024. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.01.596953v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lautenbacher L, Panse C. KoinaR - Remote machine learning inference using Koina. https://bioconductor.org/packages/koinar
  • 68.Kockmann T, Panse C. The rawrr R Package: Direct Access to Orbitrap Data and Beyond. J Proteome Res. 2021;20(4):2028–34. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bleasdale M, Boivin N, Richter KK. Oral Signature Screening Database for Palaeoproteomic Analyses of Dental Calculus. https://zenodo.org/record/4306365. 2020.
  • 70.Innocenti G, Martino ME, Stellini E, Di Fiore A, Quagliariello A. Dental calculus microbiome correlates with dietary intake. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2023;38(3):189–97. doi: 10.1111/omi.12404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan L, François R, et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. JOSS. 2019;4(43):1686. doi: 10.21105/joss.01686 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kassambara A. ggpubr: “ggplot2” Based Publication Ready Plots. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr. 2023.
  • 73.Wilke CO. cowplot: Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for “ggplot2”. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cowplot. 2024.
  • 74.Mills BR. MetBrewer: Color Palettes Inspired by Works at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MetBrewer. 2022.

Decision Letter 0

Branislav Šiler

5 Jun 2025

Dear Dr. Pecnik,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Even providing valuable information on dairy feeding habits of Scythians, the study may suffer from lack of robustness and possible insufficient number of individuals tested, as commented by reviewers. Possible risk of contamination was also mentioned as a considerable problem and the authors should meticulously address this issue. Several other methodological omissions are noted by Reviewer #2.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 20 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include a complete copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research in your revised manuscript. Our policy for research in this area aims to improve transparency in the reporting of research performed outside of researchers’ own country or community. The policy applies to researchers who have travelled to a different country to conduct research, research with Indigenous populations or their lands, and research on cultural artefacts. The questionnaire can also be requested at the journal’s discretion for any other submissions, even if these conditions are not met.  Please find more information on the policy and a link to download a blank copy of the questionnaire here: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting. Please upload a completed version of your questionnaire as Supporting Information when you resubmit your manuscript.

3. In your manuscript, please provide additional information regarding the specimens used in your study. Ensure that you have reported human remain specimen numbers and complete repository information, including museum name and geographic location.

If permits were required, please ensure that you have provided details for all permits that were obtained, including the full name of the issuing authority, and add the following statement:

“All necessary permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations.”

If no permits were required, please include the following statement:

“No permits were required for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations.”

For more information on PLOS ONE's requirements for paleontology and archeology research, see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-paleontology-and-archaeology-research .

4. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

5. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include authors J. Pecnik, A. R. Ventresca Miller, J. A. Johnson, S. Makhortykh, L. Litvinova, S. Andrukh, G. Toschev, M. Krützen, V. J. Schuenemann, and S. Wilkin.

6. Please amend your authorship list in your manuscript file to include authors Jaruschka Pecnik, Alicia Ventresca Miller, James Johnson, Sergey Makhortykh, Ludmilla Litvinova, Svetlana Andrukh, Gennady Toschev, Michael Krützen, Verena Schuenemann,  and Shevan Wilkin.

7. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain map/satellite images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

 Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

8. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: This paper presents original research on palaeo-proteomic analysis of human dental calculus to assess reliance on dairy products. Previous research presented in the paper have provided a broad picture of subsistence practices among the Scythian culture and the use of palaeo-proteomic analysis to assess specific contents of the diet is particularly useful as a complementary element of research.

The study provides evidence for the first palaeo-proteomic evidence of BTNS1A1 from dental calculus, a nice result that will encourage additional research by demonstrating additional potential questions.

While the sample size is small, this is the result of assessing the reliability of samples through oral signature assessment. It is more desirable for researchers to present small, pilot samples of solid data rather than inflate sample size with inadequate results. In addition, while the sample size is small, the proteomic data is well integrated with previous isotope and ceramic residue data to strengthen interpretations. The interpretation and conclusions presented in the paper are not overstated. The suggestion of limited access to horse milk consumption is presented as a possibility with a specific call for further assessment. The final paragraph of the conclusion focuses specifically on additional methods to further expand the initial patterns presented here.

I have only one correction - line 185, The sentence should start "As such"

Reviewer #2: This study analyzes 43 dental calculus samples from Scythian individuals and successfully identifies milk proteins in six individuals, including horse-derived milk proteins in one case. The results are archaeologically significant and offer important insights into subsistence strategies. However, several methodological and analytical aspects need more clarification or improvement.

1. High exclusion rate of dental calculus samples and possible contamination

Only 11 out of 43 samples passed the oral signature assessment, resulting in a very high exclusion rate. The authors should clearly address why so many samples failed to meet the criteria. For example, the following possibilities are candidates:

・Poor preservation of dental calculus

・Effects of post-excavation treatment or consolidation (e.g., glue from adhesives or stabilizers)

・Differences in burial environments or soil conditions at the archaeological sites

At present, it is unclear whether the low success rate reflects limitations of the proteomic protocol or issues related to sample integrity or handling.

2. Incomplete adherence to established reliability criteria in paleoproteomics

While the study reports the use of thresholds such as PSM ≥ 2, protein-level FDR < 5%, and peptide-level FDR < 2%, it does not employ stricter commonly used standards such as unique peptides ≥ 2 and FDR < 1%.

For example, the following publication supports the use of "unique peptide ≥ 2" to reduce false positives:

Peng et al., 2003, Journal of Proteome Research

https://doi.org/10.1021/pr025556v

Given the implications for reproducibility and interpretive confidence, the authors should explain why these stringent thresholds were not used, and what additional steps (if any) were taken to control the FDR. If such rationale cannot be sufficiently justified, the authors should consider reanalyzing the dataset using these established criteria.

3. Omission of deamidation analysis

Deamidation is one of the most commonly used indicators of authenticity in ancient protein studies. The authors should calculate the deamidation rates and show them in the manuscript. The authors mentioned Ramsøe et al. (2021) and other papers to justify the exclusion of deamidation analysis, bbut the previous study does not argue against calculating the deamidation rate. Instead, it highlights variability of deamidation rate of dental calculus across individuals and samples, and suggests that deamidation should be used in combination with multiple lines of evidence to authenticate ancient protein data. Given the high exclusion rate of calculus samples in this study, it would be especially valuable to report deamidation rates to support the authenticity of the peptide identifications.

4. Minor comments

・Integration with ancient genomics: The authors should discuss ancient genome of Scythians, particularly lactase persistence-related variants. Such genetic data could help to consider about the dietary interpretations.

・Equine protein spectra: Since the identification of equine milk consumption is discussed in detail, it would strengthen the study to show the MS2 spectra of the relevant peptides, particularly those assigned to Equus.

Reviewer #3: This manuscript presents a relevant study on an important topic: the history of dairying. The authors apply a relatively recent analytical approach to examine dental calculus contents and successfully retrieve dietary information of Scythian populations in present-day Ukraine, contributing to the growing body of literature about these Iron Age societies.

The analyses appear careful and methodologically rigorous, and the authors acknowledge the interpretive limitations of their data. They also clearly outline future research directions that could address the gaps and hypotheses raised in the discussion of the manuscript.

Their results provide evidence of mixed dairy pastoralism in the Scythian era, supporting previous isotopic and archaeological findings. Another important contribution of this study is the identification of horse milk protein in the dental calculus of one of the analyzed individuals, marking the first direct evidence of milk consumption from this species by the Scythians. This finding aligns with historical records of Scythian practices and adds a valuable layer of molecular data to our understanding of their dietary habits.

Furthermore, the identification of BTN1A1 (a MFGM peptide) in dental calculus represents a novel contribution to paleo-proteomics, as this marker had previously only been detected in archaeological artifacts (ceramic vessels and woven baskets) and ancient preserved cheese. This adds methodological value to the study and could influence future research in the field.

Limitations and Suggestions:

Despite the merits outlined above, the study is limited by its small sample size. Only two archaeological sites are represented, and out of 43 calculus samples collected, only samples from 11 individuals yielded proteomes that passed the criteria for dietary analysis in the “assessment of oral signature for sample authentication”. Moreover, milk protein was detected in only 6 individuals (3 per site), and horse milk was identified in just one case.

As the authors correctly acknowledge, generalizations based on such a small dataset should be cautiously approached. While the challenges of working with bioarchaeological material are well-known, and limited sample sizes are not uncommon, the study’s interpretive reach should be kept proportionate to the available evidence.

Based on the scarcity of horse milk protein in the samples, the authors suggest that access to horse milk may have varied within Scythian society, potentially reflecting hierarchical divisions. While this is a plausible hypothesis, it remains speculative given the data. Moreover, the absence of a dietary marker (such as horse milk protein) does not necessarily imply non-consumption, due to the fact that several factors affect calculus formation and the preservation of exogenous remains in its matrix.

The authors are commendably transparent about these caveats and argue that “further archaeological and biomolecular data from a wider portion of Scythian-era populations” could complement the investigations and fill the gaps left. Adding to this discussion, I would also suggest incorporating, whenever feasible, a multi-proxy approach in future analyses of dental calculus, combining, for example, protein, aDNA, and plant and other microremains data from samples (or subsamples) of the same individuals and contexts. This could strengthen interpretations and allow for a broader reconstruction of ancient diets.

In addition, I think it would be beneficial to include other bioarchaeological or bioanthropological data (if available) from the analyzed individuals, particularly the one with evidence of horse milk consumption. Such data could help assess whether status-related differences in diet are supported by other lines of evidence.

Specific observations:

• The authors state that “no other dietary proteins at distinct taxonomic levels were detected” but do not clarify whether this results from methodological limitations, database constraints, or a genuine absence of other dietary proteins. A brief explanation would be helpful.

• The section titled “Background and Workflow” is more appropriately categorized as a methodological description rather than a result. I suggest merging it with the “Methods” section for consistency and clarity.

• Line 118: The term “replication”, referring to five calculus samples, is unclear. Does this mean multiple samples from the same individual, or sub-sampling of a single calculus deposit? If the former, the authors should explain why additional samples were taken. Since the techniques used to access the dental calculus contents are typically destructive, it is important to note whether efforts were made to conserve material for future analysis and to document (by photographing and recording macroscopic aspects) the calculus deposits before its detachment. This is particularly relevant given the growing value of calculus as a multi-proxy resource.

Text revision:

Finally, the manuscript is clear and generally well written. However, it would benefit from some revisions and careful proofreading. Below are some issues I have identified in both the main text and the “Supplementary Information”:

Main Text:

• Line 68: “...easily accessible to water sources…” → Remove “to”: “easily accessible water sources.”

• Line 84: Replace “microfossil” with “micro-remains,” which is now the preferred and more accurate term in the context of dental calculus studies.

• Lines 87–88: The publication year for Soncin et al. is repeated. Please, revise for accuracy.

• Line 93: The map (Figure 1) should be cited earlier in the text, ideally when the archaeological sites are first introduced. I suggest replacing “see Supplementary Information” with “see Figure 1.”

• Lines 145–150: The sentence beginning with “While the ruminant assignments…” is unclear and needs rephrasing.

• Page 16: The URL provided for Geber et al. (2019) appears to be incorrect. Please verify and correct the citation.

Supplementary Information:

The section titled “Scythian settlements and cemeteries” would be better integrated into the manuscript’s Introduction and requires grammatical editing. For example:

- Lines 27–30: “As two important political and economic centres, the Scythian inhabitants engaged in agro-pastoralism, industrial workmanship, and trading, evidenced by historical records, (bio)archaeological findings, and multi-isotope analyses.” → This sentence should be restructured for clarity.

- Lines 34 & 52: Revise to “Bel’sk is located in northeastern Ukraine” and “in south-central Ukraine,” respectively.

- Line 66: In Supplementary Figure 2, “represent” should be corrected to “represents.”

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2026 Jan 21;21(1):e0339464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339464.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


30 Sep 2025

Response to reviewers

The authors would like to express great gratitude to the reviewers for their thoughtful reviews, constructive comments, and detailed suggestions. We greatly appreciate the opportunity to submit a major revision of our manuscript titled “Paleo-proteomic analysis of Iron Age dental calculus provides direct evidence of Scythian reliance on ruminant dairy” for your renewed consideration for submission in PLOS One. We have carefully addressed all comments and revised the manuscript accordingly. Page and line numbers refer to the revised manuscript unless otherwise noted. We also want to inform, that we adapted the site name “Bel’sk” to the Ukrainian name “Bilsk”.

Reviewers comments

Reviewer #1:

This paper presents original research on palaeo-proteomic analysis of human dental calculus to assess reliance on dairy products. Previous research presented in the paper have provided a broad picture of subsistence practices among the Scythian culture and the use of palaeo-proteomic analysis to assess specific contents of the diet is particularly useful as a complementary element of research.

The study provides evidence for the first palaeo-proteomic evidence of BTNS1A1 from dental calculus, a nice result that will encourage additional research by demonstrating additional potential questions.

While the sample size is small, this is the result of assessing the reliability of samples through oral signature assessment. It is more desirable for researchers to present small, pilot samples of solid data rather than inflate sample size with inadequate results. In addition, while the sample size is small, the proteomic data is well integrated with previous isotope and ceramic residue data to strengthen interpretations. The interpretation and conclusions presented in the paper are not overstated. The suggestion of limited access to horse milk consumption is presented as a possibility with a specific call for further assessment. The final paragraph of the conclusion focuses specifically on additional methods to further expand the initial patterns presented here.

I have only one correction - line 185, The sentence should start "As such"

Our response:

We thank the reviewer for their kind assessment of our study. We have amended the text.

Reviewer #2:

This study analyzes 43 dental calculus samples from Scythian individuals and successfully identifies milk proteins in six individuals, including horse-derived milk proteins in one case. The results are archaeologically significant and offer important insights into subsistence strategies. However, several methodological and analytical aspects need more clarification or improvement.

1. High exclusion rate of dental calculus samples and possible contamination

Only 11 out of 43 samples passed the oral signature assessment, resulting in a very high exclusion rate. The authors should clearly address why so many samples failed to meet the criteria. For example, the following possibilities are candidates:

・Poor preservation of dental calculus

・Effects of post-excavation treatment or consolidation (e.g., glue from adhesives or stabilizers)

・Differences in burial environments or soil conditions at the archaeological sites

At present, it is unclear whether the low success rate reflects limitations of the proteomic protocol or issues related to sample integrity or handling.

Our response:

We were also disappointed by the small number of samples that passed the oral signature assessment threshold, however, this outcome is not uncommon. Poor preservation and differences in burial environments / soil conditions are the most likely explanations, as they are linked, with preservation being highly dependent on factors such as microbial communities, soil conditions, and waterlogging. Preservation also varies over time and space, with some areas having amazing preservation, such as permafrost Mongolian environments. However, there have been other regions (Switzerland, Germany) where preservation may be expected to be high, but is rather the opposite. As several of these studies resulted in a lack of dietary proteins the data are often not published. While publishing negative results is ideal, these reports cannot interpret missing data and therefore generally do not meet journal requirements for publication. The preservation in this paper is not as consistently good as others, but nevertheless does contain the first proteomic dietary data for Scythians, and we believe it deserves to be published. Ideally, more samples will be assessed in the future, lending additional and more nuanced insights into their diets across a greater area of their realm of influence. There were no glues or other curatorial issues with these samples, and they were extracted using a well-established protocol for ancient human dental calculus.

However, it is important that we point out that out of 43 dental calculus samples that derived from a total of 28 individuals, 15 instead of 11 samples passed the oral signature assessment. These 15 samples with an authentic oral signature derived from 11 individuals.

Our analysis process for the assessment of the oral signature for sample authentication can be found in the method section, which explains that the proteome of all samples were first analyzed for its oral signature and only the proteomes that passed were further analyzed for the presence of dietary proteins. However, in case multiple proteomes from the same individual passed the assessment, the raw MS/MS data of these samples were merged (i.e., 151-152, 181-182, 185-186, and 220-221) and subsequently, the data pre-processing and assessment of oral signature was performed. With this approach, we wanted to make sure that we only analyze or merge data with a good oral signature.

We have adapted this sentence in the results section to make it clearer:

Out of 43 samples from 28 individuals, the proteomes of only 15 samples from 11 individuals passed the oral signature assessment (Bilsk: n=6, Mamai-Gora: n=5).

2. Incomplete adherence to established reliability criteria in paleoproteomics

While the study reports the use of thresholds such as PSM ≥ 2, protein-level FDR < 5%, and peptide-level FDR < 2%, it does not employ stricter commonly used standards such as unique peptides ≥ 2 and FDR < 1%.

For example, the following publication supports the use of "unique peptide ≥ 2" to reduce false positives:

Peng et al., 2003, Journal of Proteome Research

https://doi.org/10.1021/pr025556v

Given the implications for reproducibility and interpretive confidence, the authors should explain why these stringent thresholds were not used, and what additional steps (if any) were taken to control the FDR. If such rationale cannot be sufficiently justified, the authors should consider reanalyzing the dataset using these established criteria.

Our response:

While a 1% FDR is used widely in single organism/tissue studies of modern proteomics, we are looking at an extremely diverse and ancient metaproteome. It is generally accepted in these cases, especially dental calculus, to aim for 5% protein FDR and 2% peptide FDR. These percentages are used as initial aims, but the actual FDR percentages are always lower, and are reported in the supplementary tables. Please note that when looking at the actual peptide FDR for each sample that passed the preservation assessment in the Supplementary Tables (ST4), the rates are 0.43; 0; 0.98; 1.16; 0.22; 0.7; 0.83; 0.23; 1.03; 0; 0.62, with an average peptide FDR of 0.56.

Furthermore, as clearly stated in the data analysis paragraph of our methods section, before the FDR was calculated the data from each sample were filtered to include only proteins supported by 2 PSMs, and PSMs with an expect value lower than 0.01, which excludes unreliable PSMs.

These papers have also used an aim of 5% protein and 2% peptide cutoffs, which includes Nature, PNAS, and this journal:

Wilkin et al., 2021, Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03798-4

Wilkin et al., 2020, Nature Ecol Evol, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1120-y

Ventresca Miller et al., 2022, PLOS One, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265775

Hendy et al., 2018, Nat Commun, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06335-6

Jeong et al., 2018, PNAS, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181360811

Also, we conducted an additional validation of the PSMs with Mascot ion scores below 40 using spectral angle validation. With this newly established strategy in paleo-proteomics by Wilkin and colleagues (in review), we had to exclude a total of six dietary PSMs which did not reach the Spectral angle Pearson scores or after this assessment, the data did not meet the >= 2 PSMs per protein requirement. Hence, the figures, tables, and data in the text had to be adapted accordingly. A detailed description of the analysis can be found in the method section of the manuscript and the corresponding data can be found in the S4 Table of the supplementary information.

The new paragraph in the method section of “Data analysis” reads like this:

To further validate all dietary PSMs with a Mascot ion score below 40, we applied the same strategy for spectral angle validation as conducted by Wilkin and colleagues in Review (64). We compared each spectrum after removal of the precursor ion peak with the corresponding `AlphaPept_ms_generic` (65) fragment-ion prediction model using R (version 4.5.1), Bioconductor (version 3.19), and the koinar package (66,67). For this, we used the model parameters of QE for Thermo Fischer Scientific (TFS) QExactive mass spectrometer and of 28eV for the collision energy (CE) setting. The spectral data was extracted from the TFS generated raw files using the rawrr package (68). We considered PSMs without methionine or proline modification (Unimod:35) with spectral angle Pearson scores >= 0.70 as positively identified peptides, whereas PSMs with these modifications had to reach a threshold of >=0.60 for incorporation in the study. The latter adapted threshold is due to the limited prediction power with respect to post-translational modifications in current prediction models (64). Based on spectral angle Pearson scores and minimum PSM count per protein (>=2), a total of six dietary PSMs had to be excluded from this study (S4 Table).

3. Omission of deamidation analysis

Deamidation is one of the most commonly used indicators of authenticity in ancient protein studies. The authors should calculate the deamidation rates and show them in the manuscript. The authors mentioned Ramsøe et al. (2021) and other papers to justify the exclusion of deamidation analysis, bbut the previous study does not argue against calculating the deamidation rate. Instead, it highlights variability of deamidation rate of dental calculus across individuals and samples, and suggests that deamidation should be used in combination with multiple lines of evidence to authenticate ancient protein data. Given the high exclusion rate of calculus samples in this study, it would be especially valuable to report deamidation rates to support the authenticity of the peptide identifications.

Our response:

We agree with the reviewer and we have now included a bulk deamidation assessment for this study. Details about the method are described in the “Assessment of oral signature for sample authentication” section and results of the assessment can be found in the results section such as the corresponding figure in the supplementary information (S2 Fig).

The new section in the methods reads now like this:

In addition, a bulk deamidation analysis of asparagine and glutamine was conducted to assess possible indications of age-induced degradation (38). For this, we compared the deamidation rates in proteins matching the laboratory and common contaminant database with those matching the oral cavity (oral microbiome and host proteins) and dietary proteins. To compare total deamidation rates between contaminants and the group of oral cavity and dietary proteins, we performed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests separately within the groups of individuals who passed and failed the oral signature authentication. Data processing, statistical testing, and visualisations were performed in R (version 4.5.1) using the packages tidyverse (71) and ggpubr (72).

The new paragraph in the results section reads like this:

Out of 43 samples from 28 individuals, the proteomes of only 15 samples from 11 individuals passed the oral signature assessment (Bilsk: n=6, Mamai-Gora: n=5) (S1 Fig). Within the group of individuals who passed the oral signature authentication, a Wilcoxon rank-sum test showed a significant difference in total deamidation rates between contaminants and the group of oral cavity and dietary proteins (p = 1.1 × 10⁻⁵). In contrast, no significant difference was observed within the failed group (p = 0.3) (S2A Fig). The deamidation rates of asparagine to aspartic acid (N2D) and glutamine to glutamic acid (Q2E), plotted from all proteomes that passed the oral signature assessment, showed higher deamidation rates for asparagine than for glutamine (S2B Fig), consistent with the slower deamidation rate of glutamine compared to asparagine (42).

4. Minor comments

・Integration with ancient genomics: The authors should discuss ancient genome of Scythians, particularly lactase persistence-related variants. Such genetic data could help to consider about the dietary interpretations.

Our response:

LP allele frequency in the Iron Age is very low, around 2-3% in Scythians, which is the same as all other Europeans and Central Asians at the time. LP was low until much later in time, even though people were clearly consuming dairy for over 5000 years. To understand the nuances regarding the link between LP allele and Scythian’s ability to drink fresh milk we will need more information past gut microbiomes and pre-consumptions methods that reduce or break down lactose. Interestingly, today in Mongolia (as occurred over the last 5,000 years) people consume large amounts of fresh milk, especially in Spring-Autumn, without a genetic adaptation to break down the lactose into glucose and galactose so that it can be absorbed. Therefore, whether the Scythians did or have the allele may not have affected their ability to drink milk without negative side effects. As we have very little information on milk consumption over the entirety of the Scythian range of influence, we would like to reserve this conversation for when we have more data.

Unterländer et al., 2017, Nat Commun, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14615

Evershed et al., 2022, Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05010-7

Segurel et al., 2020, PLoS Biol, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000742

・Equine protein spectra: Since the identification of equine milk consumption is discussed in detail, it would strengthen the study to show the MS2 spectra of the relevant peptides, particularly those assigned to Equus.

Our response

We have now added an MS/MS fragmentation spectra of a horse peptide to the newly created Figure 3.

Reviewer #3:

This manuscript presents a relevant study on an important topic: the history of dairying. The authors apply a relatively recent analytical approach to examine dental calculus contents and successfully retrieve dietary information of Scythian populations in present-day Ukraine, contributing to the growing body of literature about these Iron Age societies.

The analyses appear careful and methodologically rigorous, and the authors acknowledge the interpretive limitations of their data. They also clearly outline future research directions that could address the gaps and hypotheses raised in the discussion of the manuscript.

Their results provide evidence of mixed dairy pastoralism in the Scythian era, supporting previous isotopic and archaeological findings. Another important contribution of this study is the identification of horse milk protein in the dental calculus of one of the analyzed individuals, marking the first direct evidence of milk consumption from this species by the Scythians. This finding aligns with historical records of Scythian practices and adds a valuable layer of molecular data to our understanding of their dietary habits.

Furthermore, the identification of

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0339464.s005.docx (32.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Branislav Šiler

26 Nov 2025

Dear Dr. Pecnik,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Several additional clarifications should be made, according to Reviewer #4.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 10 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #2: N/A

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #4: I enjoyed reading and assessing this manuscript on the palaeoproteomics of Scythian dental calculus. The topic addressed is important for understanding the occurrence and diversity of dairy use in the Iron Age steppe context. The study is clearly written and appears to be methodologically careful, particularly following the recent manuscript revisions. The identification of BTN1A1 is an interesting and valuable aspect of the work. The reports of horse milk assignment are quite well supported. Overall, this is a well-conducted and interesting contribution, and I have only a few comments that should be straightforward to address.

Sample size

The sample size is small but carefully filtered, which is entirely appropriate. This approach is preferable to inflating n with data of uncertain or poor quality, and it reflects a commendable level of caution in data selection.

Clarification from the response to Reviewer 2

In the response to Reviewer 2, the authors state that “the high failure rate is interpreted as reflecting variable preservation rather than laboratory contamination, as no consolidants were used and blanks were clear.” This is a reasonable explanation, but it is not clear whether this statement appears explicitly in the main text. If not, it would be good to include a brief mention of this rationale in the manuscript itself for transparency.

Title and framing

The title emphasises milk as a staple through the word “reliance.” While this is an engaging framing, it might be a little strong given that the dataset comprises only six samples with milk proteins from two sites. This represents solid direct evidence for dairy consumption, and likely regular consumption, but “reliance” may somewhat overstate the strength of the direct data unless the authors’ argument is that these proteomic findings confirm or complement historical accounts of horse milk use among Scythian groups. Some slight moderation or clarification of this framing could be considered.

Threshold at 0.5

The choice of a pass threshold at 0.5 “based on inspection” could benefit from a brief justification in the Methods section. For instance, was this threshold selected because it effectively distinguishes between highly contaminated samples and oral-rich proteomes? A short explanatory sentence would help readers understand how this decision was made and improve methodological clarity.

Deamidation

The inclusion of deamidation assessment in the revised manuscript is reassuring and significantly strengthens confidence in the authenticity of the results. This is a valuable addition.

Protein naming consistency

There appear to be inconsistencies in the naming of BTN1A1 / BTNS1A1 / BTS1A1. These should be standardised throughout the manuscript for clarity and accuracy.

Data availability

In the tracked version, the following statement appears:

“Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited on MassIVE (massive.ucsd.edu; MSV000092635). For reviewer access use the username: MSV000092635_reviewer and the password: Scythian-Paper!.”

This is perfectly acceptable during peer review but would raise a minor concern if carried into the published version, as it suggests the repository may not yet be fully public. PLOS will expect the dataset to be completely open (no login required) upon publication.

In the final version, the Data Availability statement should therefore read simply:

“Mass spectrometry proteomics data are available on MassIVE (MSV000092635).”

No usernames or passwords should be included.

Table 1 – Locality of individual (Sr)

In Table 1, the column “Locality of individual (Sr)” includes the entry “born outside and moved as a child.” I understand this derives from a previous study, but it remains an interpretation rather than a directly observed result. While it may be a strong inference, it is still an inference. The column heading or note should make clear that this is an interpretive statement rather than a direct measurement.

Overall, this is a thoughtful and well-constructed study that makes a meaningful contribution to the growing field of ancient proteomics. With a few minor clarifications and adjustments as suggested above, it will make a solid addition to the literature.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #4: Yes:  Robert C. Power

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures 

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation. 

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

PLoS One. 2026 Jan 21;21(1):e0339464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339464.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


5 Dec 2025

Response to reviewers

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the reviewers for their careful evaluation and valuable insights. We are very thankful that we have the opportunity to submit the following minor revisions of our manuscript titled “Paleo-proteomic analysis of Iron Age dental calculus provides direct evidence of Scythian reliance on ruminant dairy” for the consideration for submission in PLOS One. We have carefully addressed all comments and revised the manuscript accordingly. Page and line numbers refer to the revised manuscript unless otherwise noted.

Reviewers comments

Reviewer #4:

I enjoyed reading and assessing this manuscript on the palaeoproteomics of Scythian dental calculus. The topic addressed is important for understanding the occurrence and diversity of dairy use in the Iron Age steppe context. The study is clearly written and appears to be methodologically careful, particularly following the recent manuscript revisions. The identification of BTN1A1 is an interesting and valuable aspect of the work. The reports of horse milk assignment are quite well supported. Overall, this is a well-conducted and interesting contribution, and I have only a few comments that should be straightforward to address.

Sample size

The sample size is small but carefully filtered, which is entirely appropriate. This approach is preferable to inflating n with data of uncertain or poor quality, and it reflects a commendable level of caution in data selection.

Clarification from the response to Reviewer 2

In the response to Reviewer 2, the authors state that “the high failure rate is interpreted as reflecting variable preservation rather than laboratory contamination, as no consolidants were used and blanks were clear.” This is a reasonable explanation, but it is not clear whether this statement appears explicitly in the main text. If not, it would be good to include a brief mention of this rationale in the manuscript itself for transparency.

Our response:

Thank you very much for your thoughtful review and kind words. We agree that the manuscript could benefit from our explanation to reviewer #2 from our first revision, thus we have added the following sentence to the results section from line 128 to 131: Since the teeth had not been treated with consolidants and the extraction blanks processed alongside the samples in the dedicated clean laboratory were clean, the high failure rate was interpreted as reflecting variable preservation in the samples.

Title and framing

The title emphasises milk as a staple through the word “reliance.” While this is an engaging framing, it might be a little strong given that the dataset comprises only six samples with milk proteins from two sites. This represents solid direct evidence for dairy consumption, and likely regular consumption, but “reliance” may somewhat overstate the strength of the direct data unless the authors’ argument is that these proteomic findings confirm or complement historical accounts of horse milk use among Scythian groups. Some slight moderation or clarification of this framing could be considered.

Our response:

Thank you very much for your insights. We believe that the title, “Paleo-proteomic analysis of Iron Age dental calculus provides direct evidence of Scythian reliance on ruminant dairy,” accurately reflects the findings of our manuscript, which in our study are interpreted in the context of existing archaeological, historical, and multi-isotopic evidence. Our results show that preserved dietary peptides provide direct evidence for the consumption of ruminant dairy among multiple individuals at both studied sites, whereas horse milk was detected in only one individual. Therefore, the term “reliance” reflects the integration of these proteomic findings with the broader archaeological, historical, and stable isotopic evidence, indicating that ruminant dairy was likely a regular and significant component of their diet. In contrast, the limited horse milk peptide findings do not allow us to make the same claim.

Threshold at 0.5

The choice of a pass threshold at 0.5 “based on inspection” could benefit from a brief justification in the Methods section. For instance, was this threshold selected because it effectively distinguishes between highly contaminated samples and oral-rich proteomes? A short explanatory sentence would help readers understand how this decision was made and improve methodological clarity.

Our response:

Thank you very much for pointing this out. We have adapted to text for further clarification to the following (lines 380 – 381): Based on the visual inspection of each proteome and the comparison of the oral and contaminant PSM counts within the whole dataset, the threshold to pass as an authentic sample was set to 0.5.

Deamidation

The inclusion of deamidation assessment in the revised manuscript is reassuring and significantly strengthens confidence in the authenticity of the results. This is a valuable addition.

Protein naming consistency

There appear to be inconsistencies in the naming of BTN1A1 / BTNS1A1 / BTS1A1. These should be standardised throughout the manuscript for clarity and accuracy.

Our response:

Thank you very much for noticing the inconsistencies in the naming of Butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1. We have adapted all of those instances to the correct name of BTN1A1 (i.e. lines: 156, 162, and 221, and Table 1).

Data availability

In the tracked version, the following statement appears:

“Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited on MassIVE (massive.ucsd.edu; MSV000092635). For reviewer access use the username: MSV000092635_reviewer and the password: Scythian-Paper!.”

This is perfectly acceptable during peer review but would raise a minor concern if carried into the published version, as it suggests the repository may not yet be fully public. PLOS will expect the dataset to be completely open (no login required) upon publication.

In the final version, the Data Availability statement should therefore read simply:

“Mass spectrometry proteomics data are available on MassIVE (MSV000092635).”

No usernames or passwords should be included.

Our response:

Thank you for your comment. We have already made the data public on MassIVE during the last revision process and therefore the sentence with the password credentials was flagged as deleted in the manuscript with track changes document. Nevertheless, we have amended the text according to your suggestion, so it reads clearer.

Table 1 – Locality of individual (Sr)

In Table 1, the column “Locality of individual (Sr)” includes the entry “born outside and moved as a child.” I understand this derives from a previous study, but it remains an interpretation rather than a directly observed result. While it may be a strong inference, it is still an inference. The column heading or note should make clear that this is an interpretive statement rather than a direct measurement.

Our response:

Thank you for your comment. We agree that the column could benefit from clarification. Therefore, we have amended the column title with an asterisk and added an explanation at the bottom of the table (line 149), which reads like this: * Interpretation based on strontium isotopic data (87Sr/86Sr).

Overall, this is a thoughtful and well-constructed study that makes a meaningful contribution to the growing field of ancient proteomics. With a few minor clarifications and adjustments as suggested above, it will make a solid addition to the literature.

Our response:

We want to express at this point again great gratitude to the careful review and thoughtful comments of Robert C. Power.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

pone.0339464.s006.docx (22.4KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Branislav Šiler

8 Dec 2025

Paleo-proteomic analysis of Iron Age dental calculus provides direct evidence of Scythian reliance on ruminant dairy

PONE-D-25-05635R2

Dear Dr. Pecnik,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Branislav Šiler

PONE-D-25-05635R2

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Pecnik,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Branislav T. Šiler

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Oral signature heatmaps of individuals from Bilsk and Mamai-Gora and bulk deamidation rates of asparagine and glutamine of proteomes that passed and failed the oral signature assessment.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0339464.s001.docx (386KB, docx)
    S2 File. Sample information, details on extraction and measurement method of samples, oral signature assessment, and dietary peptide spectrum matches.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0339464.s002.xlsx (36.4KB, xlsx)
    S3 File. Inclusivity in global research.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0339464.s003.docx (67.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0339464.s005.docx (32.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

    pone.0339464.s006.docx (22.4KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files except for mass spectrometry proteomics data, which is publicly accessible on MassIVE (massive.ucsd.edu; MSV000092635).


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES