Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Jan 21;21(1):e0341445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341445

RIPK2 induces docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer through the NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway

Shaoqiang Xing 1,2,#, Zhaoliang Xu 1,2,#, Sheng Zeng 2, Minghao Yue 2, Wenzhou Xing 2, Qian Liu 1,2,*
Editor: Saki Raheem3
PMCID: PMC12822930  PMID: 41563982

Abstract

Chemoresistance is a reason for treatment failure in prostate cancer. Receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIPK2) has been shown to play a role in drug resistance in various cancers; however, its role and the underlying mechanism of chemoresistance in prostate cancer are unclear. We analyzed data from The Cancer Genome Atlas for RIPK2 expression in prostate cancer and its association with clinicopathological features. We also elucidated the role and mechanism of action of RIPK2 in prostate cancer cell resistance to docetaxel (DTX). The results showed that RIPK2 expression was upregulated in prostate cancer tissues and was associated with poor pathological grading. RIPK2 was also upregulated in 22RV1/DTX, C4-2/DTX, PC-3/DTX, and DU145/DTX cell lines and involved in DTX resistance. Mechanistic experiments revealed that RIPK2 was involved in DTX resistance by upregulating P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression through the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway. Xenograft tumor experiments confirmed that inhibition of RIPK2 or P-gp enhanced the efficacy of DTX in suppressing PC-3/DTX growth. Taken together, these results suggest that RIPK2 mediates DTX resistance in prostate cancer cells through the NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway. RIPK2 and its downstream signaling molecules are potential targets for the treatment of chemoresistant prostate cancer.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is a common genitourinary tumor in men with serious effects on patients’ physical and mental health. Between 2015 and 2022, the incidence of prostate cancer in China increased from 10.2/100,000 to 18.6/100,000 [1,2]. Currently, treatments for prostate cancer include surgery, endocrine therapy, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy [3,4]. Chemotherapy is an important strategy for the treatment of advanced metastatic prostate cancer following endocrine or radiation therapy failure, and the use of drugs such as docetaxel (DTX), carboplatin, and olaparib has significantly prolonged patient survival [5,6]. However, tumors tend to develop acquired resistance to these drugs when administered over long periods, leading to treatment failure. Therefore, overcoming chemoresistance in prostate cancer is of great clinical importance.

Receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIPK2) is a serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase that was first reported to be involved in inflammation and innate immunity [7,8]. Recent studies have shown that RIPK2 also plays pivotal roles in tumorigenesis and malignant tumor progression. Clinical studies have found that RIPK2 is associated with poor prognosis in pancreatic [9], lung [10], renal [11], and colorectal [12] cancers and can be used as a prognostic marker. RIPK2 is involved in tumor cell proliferation [13], migration [14], invasion [15], and metastasis [16]. In addition, RIPK2 may play a role in tumor immune escape by inhibiting antigen presentation and the cytotoxicity of cytotoxic T cells [17]. Recent studies have shown that RIPK2 mediates paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer [18] and temozolomide resistance in glioma [19]. Other studies have shown that RIPK2 promotes prostate cancer metastasis by increasing c-Myc activity via mitogen-activated protein kinase 7 [20]. However, whether RIPK2 mediates chemoresistance in prostate cancer remains unclear.

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an ATP-dependent carrier protein encoded by the human multidrug resistance gene MDR1 [21]. P-gp is widely distributed in normal human tissues, and its expression effectively protects organisms from exogenous harmful substances under physiological conditions [21]. Under pathological conditions, P-gp may be involved in the development of chemoresistance in tumor cells [22]. However, the involvement of RIPK2 in prostate cancer chemoresistance and its association with P-gp has not yet been reported. In this study, we aimed to observe the effect of RIPK2 on the chemoresistance of prostate cancer cells and the mediatory role of P-gp to provide a reference for the development of novel therapeutics.

Materials and methods

Access to public datasets

Prostate cancer RIPK2 expression and Gleason scores from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset were analyzed using the UALCAN portal (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/), which analyzes cancer omics data and provides comprehensive transcriptomic data on cancer from TCGA. A total of 497 tumor samples and 52 normal tissue samples were included in the analysis. Gleason score grouping and subsequent statistical analysis were performed using the default parameters of UALCAN.

PC-3/DTX resistant cell line construction

22RV1, C4-2, PC-3, and DU145 cells were purchased from the BeNa Culture Collection (Xinyang, China). Cells were cultured in F-12K medium (Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco-BRL). 22RV1/DTX, C4-2/DTX, PC-3/DTX, and DU145/DTX DTX-resistant cell lines were obtained after six months by gradually increasing the concentration of DTX (MedChem Express, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) with intermittent induction.

In vitro cell assays

The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, MedChem Express) assay was performed as follows: cells were inoculated in 96-well plates overnight and treated with a DTX concentration gradient (0.001–100 nM) for 48 h. Ten microliters of CCK-8 solution were added to each well according to the manufacturer’s instructions and incubated for 4 h. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using an enzyme marker (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Crystalline violet staining was performed as follows: cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Codow, Guangzhou, China) and treated with 0.5% crystal violet staining solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China) for 10 min. Cells were observed and photographed under a TS2 inverted microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

siRNA transfection

RIPK2 siRNA and control siRNA were designed and synthesized by Genomeditech (Shanghai, China). Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Biosynth, Tianjin, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 150 pM of siRNA was used for transfection. After 8 h of transfection, the medium was replaced with F-12K medium containing 10% FBS. After 24 h of transfection, the cells were ready for use in subsequent experiments. siRNA complementary to RIPK2 mRNA with the following sequences: 5′-CACCAATCCTTTGCAGATAAT-3′, and nontargeting control siRNA, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU-3′

Plasmid transfection

The pLV-Puro RIPK2-containing plasmid and the empty plasmid were designed and synthesized by Genomeditech. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 8 μg/ml of plasmid was used for transfection. After 8 h of transfection, the medium was replaced with F-12K medium containing 10% FBS. Cell lines with stable expression were screened using a monoclonal method.

Western blotting

Protein quantification and sample preparation were performed using a bicinchoninic acid kit (Absin, Shanghai, China) and loading buffer (Absin), respectively. The total protein was separated using 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (LMAI, Shanghai, China). The PVDF membrane was closed in a sealing solution for 4 h, and then successively incubated with the primary and secondary antibodies. Primary antibodies included antibodies against RIPK2 (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:1000), GAPDH (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:2000), p-NF-κB p65 (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:1000), NF-κB p65 (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:2000), IκBα (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:1000), and P-gp (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:1000) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). A sheep anti-rabbit IgG HRP peroxidase-conjugated antibody was used as the secondary antibody (1:4000) (Cell Signaling Technology). The PVDF membranes were treated with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit and placed in a gel imager (Bio-Rad) for imaging and photography.

Immunofluorescence assay

Cells were inoculated into confocal dishes and cultured for 24 h. The cells were sequentially fixed, permeabilized, and closed using methanol, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 5% goat serum (Solarbio). Cells were incubated with NF-κB p65 (1:200) or P-gp (1:100) (Absin) antibodies. The primary antibodies were then conjugated to goat anti-rabbit IgG-AF488 and goat anti-mouse IgG-AF555 antibodies (Absin). Cells were blocked by incubation with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Solarbio) for nuclear staining followed by dropwise addition of anti-fluorescence burst blocking solution. Cells were imaged and photographed under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon).

Flow cytometry

Cells were digested with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-free trypsin (Absin) and collected in 5 ml centrifuge tubes. Flow cytometry was performed using an apoptosis detection kit (Absin) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells were collected and resuspended with 300 μL of 1 × binding buffer. 5 μL Annexin V-FITC was added to the suspension and incubated for 15 min, followed by 5 μL PI for 2 min. Apoptosis was detected using an Accuri C6 Plus flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

Animal experiments

The animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin First Central Hospital (Protocol Number: 2023-0815-001) and followed the Regulations on the Management of Experiments approved by the State Council of China. This study followed the ARRIVE guidelines. All surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. Six- to seven-week-old BALB/c-Nude mice were purchased from Changzhou Cavens Laboratory Animal Co. The experimental animals were kept in a SPF-level Laboratory Animal Room for one week, and then subcutaneously injected with 200 μL PC-3/DTX cell suspension (1 × 107 cells/mL) in the right dorsum. Tumor volume was measured using Vernier calipers and calculated using the following formula: tumor volume (TV) = tumor long diameter × short diameter 2/2. Tumor measurement and analysis were performed using a blinded method. When the xenograft tumors grew to approximately 200 mm3, the mice were randomly divided into four groups (4 animals per group): DTX (MedChem Express, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA), DTX + GSK583 (MedChem Express), DTX+tariquidar (MedChem Express), and Control. DTX (15 mg/kg, i.v.), GSK583 (3 mg/kg, p.o.), and tariquidar (15 mg/kg, p.o.) were administered twice per week for four weeks. The control group received the corresponding vehicle via gavage and tail vein injection. Daily monitoring of animal health and behavior was conducted, with humane endpoints implemented when animals showed >15% weight loss (1-week period), excessively large tumors (≥20 mm in diameter), or overt signs of poor condition (e.g., reduced activity, anorexia). At the end of the experiment, mice were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane and subsequently rapidly sacrificed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation. The tumors were stripped, weighed, and subsequently placed in 4% paraformaldehyde for internal fixation.

Immunohistochemistry

Tissues were cut into small pieces and placed in an embedding box for dehydration and tissue embedding. The embedded tissue was cut into 4 μm sections. Sections were spread in warm water at 37°C and then fixed on slides before baking. Sections were sequentially deparaffinized, hydrated, antigenically repaired (100℃, 15 min), and incubated with 5% goat serum for 30 min. The sections were then incubated overnight with antibodies against Ki67 (mouse monoclonal antibody; 1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and P-gp (1:100). Ki67 or P-gp antibody was conjugated with an enzymatically labeled goat anti-mouse/rabbit IgG secondary antibody (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China). They were then washed to remove any unbound antibodies and incubated with DAB chromogenic solution (ZSGB-BIO) until the color developed. Sections were re-stained with hematoxylin (ZSGB-BIO) for nuclei, dehydrated, and sealed with neutral gum (ZSGB-BIO). The following day, the sections were observed and photographed under an orthostatic microscope (Nikon). The integrated optical density values of tissue sections were measured using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 27.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) for Windows. In vitro data were based on biological triplicate experiments, with each biological replicate performed in at least three technical repeats to ensure reproducibility. All results are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. Data comparisons between multiple groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance, and multiple comparisons were made using Tukey’s test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

RIPK2 expression in prostate cancer

We first analyzed prostate cancer RIPK2 expression in TCGA database using the University of Alabama at Birmingham cancer data analysis (UALCAN) portal. RIPK2 mRNA levels were upregulated in prostate cancer tissues when compared to those in normal prostate tissues (Fig 1A). RIPK2 expression was consistently positively correlated with prostate cancer Gleason scores (Fig 1B).

Fig 1. RIPK2 expression in prostate cancer cells.

Fig 1

(A) RIPK2 mRNA expression levels in normal prostate and prostate cancer tissues as identified by TCGA data. **P < 0.01 compared to Normal. (B) Association of RIPK2 mRNA expression with Gleason scores in prostate cancer based on TGCA data. ** P < 0.01 compared to Normal; ## P < 0.01 compared to Gleason score 6; ^^ P < 0.01 compared to Gleason score 7; & P < 0.05 compared to Gleason score 8.

RIPK2 induces DTX resistance in prostate cancer cells

We induced DTX-resistant prostate cancer cell lines 22RV1/DTX, C4-2/DTX, PC-3/DTX, and DU145/DTX by progressively increasing the drug concentration, with resistance indices of 16.2, 6.1, 11.5, and 6.6, respectively (Fig 2A). We further found that RIPK2 protein expression was upregulated in these four cells (Fig 2B). To observe the relationship between RIPK2 protein and DTX resistance, we used siRNA to interfere with RIPK2 expression and observed the changes in sensitivity to DTX in 22RV1/DTX, C4-2/DTX, PC-3/DTX, and DU145/DTX cells. The results showed that each DTX-resistant cell showed increased sensitivity to DTX after interfering with RIPK2 protein expression, with PC-3/DTX showing the most pronounced increase (Fig 2C). For this reason, we used PC-3/DTX cells for subsequent studies. Verification of the silencing effect of RIPK2 by crystal violet staining revealed that silencing of RIPK2 enhanced the sensitivity of PC-3/DTX cells to DTX (Fig 2D). In addition, we overexpressed RIPK2 in PC-3 cells and found that the sensitivity of the cells to DTX was significantly reduced (Fig 2E-2G).

Fig 2. Effects of RIPK2 on DTX resistance in prostate cancer cells.

Fig 2

(A) 22RV1/DTX, C4-2/DTX, PC-3/DTX, and DU145/DTX cells were treated with DTX (0.001 ~ 100 nM) for 48 h. Cell viability was measured by CCK-8 assay. (B) Western blotting was performed to detect the expression level of RIPK2 in normal and drug-resistant prostate cancer cells. (C) Effect of DTX on 22RV1/DTX, C4-2/DTX, PC-3/DTX, and DU145/DTX cell viability after siRNA interference with RIPK2 expression. (D) Crystalline violet staining assay to detect the sensitivity of PC-3/DTX cells to DTX after RIPK2 silencing. (E) RIPK2 protein expression level in PC-3 cells after transfection with RIPK2 plasmid. RIPK2 expression levels in PC-3 cells after transfection with the RIPK2 plasmid. Sensitivity of PC-3 cells to DTX was detected by CCK-8 assay (F) and crystal violet staining (G) after overexpression of RIPK2. **P < 0.01. n = 3 in A-G.

RIPK2 induces activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in prostate cancer cells

To explore the biological role of RIPK2 in prostate cancer cells, we examined the NF-κB signaling pathway. We found that transfection of the RIPK2 plasmid induced NF-κB p65 phosphorylation, as well as downregulation of IκBα protein expression in PC-3 cells (Fig 3A). Transfection of the RIPK2 plasmid also induced the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 (Fig 3B). The addition of siRNAs against RIPK2 led to decreased NF-κB p65 phosphorylation levels and upregulated IκBα protein expression in PC-3/DTX cells (Fig 3C). Meanwhile, the expression of NF-κB p65 in the nuclei of PC-3/DTX cells decreased after RIPK2 knockdown (Fig 3D).

Fig 3. Effects of varying RIPK2 expression on the NF-κB signaling pathway.

Fig 3

(A) Changes in p-NF-κB p65 and IκBα expression in PC-3 cells after overexpression of RIPK2. (B) Changes in the subcellular distribution of NF-κB p65 in PC-3 cells after RIPK2 overexpression. (C) Changes in p-NF-κB p65 and IκBα expression in PC-3/DTX cells after RIPK2 knockdown. (D) Changes in NF-κB p65 subcellular distribution in PC-3/DTX cells after RIPK2 knockdown. **P < 0.01. n = 3 in A-D.

RIPK2/NF-κB signaling mediates the upregulation of P-gp protein expression

We further found that RIPK2 overexpression in PC-3 cells was accompanied by an upregulation in P-gp protein expression (Fig 4A). Meanwhile, silencing RIPK2 expression resulted in the downregulation of P-gp expression in PC-3/DTX cells (Fig 4A). Immunofluorescence experiments showed that P-gp expression and the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 increased in RIPK2-overexpressing PC-3 cells (Fig 4B). Silencing of RIPK2 had the opposite effect in PC-3/DTX cells (Fig 4B). To verify the relationship between RIPK2/NF-κB signaling and P-gp protein expression, we assessed the effects of NF-κB inhibitors (JSH-23, BAY11−7085, and SN50) on PC-3 cells. Pretreatment with JSH-23, BAY11−7085, or SN50 inhibited upregulation of P-gp expression induced by RIPK2 overexpression (Fig 4C), thus leading to decreased P-gp expression in PC-3/DTX cells (Fig 4D).

Fig 4. Effect of the RIPK2/NF-κB signaling pathway on P-gp expression.

Fig 4

(A) Effects of exogenous regulation of RIPK2 expression in PC-3 and PC-3/DTX cells and western blotting for P-gp expression. (B) Effect of RIPK2 on subcellular localization of NF-κB p65 and P-gp expression, as determined by immunofluorescence. PC-3/DTX cells (C) or RIPK2-overexpressing PC-3 cells (D) were treated with the NF-κB inhibitors JSH-23, BAY11-7085, or SN50, and P-gp expression was detected using western blotting. **P < 0.01. n = 3 in A-D.

Inhibition of the RIPK2/NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway enhances the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to DTX

We further validated the role of the RIPK2/NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway in the resistance of prostate cancer cells to DTX. We found that treatment with either SN50, an NF-κB inhibitor, or tariquidar, a P-gp inhibitor, enhanced the inhibitory effect of DTX on the proliferation of RIPK2-overexpressing PC-3 cells (Fig 5A). Treatment with SN50 or tariquidar also enhanced DTX-induced apoptosis in RIPK2-overexpressing PC-3 cells (Fig 5B). We confirmed the role of the RIPK2/NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway in PC-3/DTX cells. Treatment with SN50 or tariquidar had similar effects on proliferation and apoptosis in PC-3/DTX cells (Fig 5C and 5D). In addition, treatment with GSK583, a RIPK2 inhibitor, enhanced the efficacy of DTX in PC-3/DTX cells, leading to decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis (Fig 5C and 5D).

Fig 5. Inhibition of the RIPK2/NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway enhances the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to DTX.

Fig 5

RIPK2-overexpressing PC-3 cells were treated with the NF-κB inhibitor SN50 or P-gp inhibitor tariquidar, and cell sensitivity to DTX (12 nM) was assessed using crystal violet staining (A) and flow cytometry (B). PC-3/DTX cells were treated with SN50, tariquidar, or the RIPK2 inhibitor GSK583, and cell sensitivity to DTX (12 nM) was detected using crystal violet staining (C) and flow cytometry (D). **P < 0.01. n = 3 in A-D.

The results of the animal experiments showed that GSK583 treatment downregulated P-gp expression in PC-3/DTX xenograft tumor tissues (Fig 6A). Treatment with GSK583 or tariquidar in combination with DTX downregulated the expression of the proliferation marker Ki67 (Fig 6A).

Fig 6. Effects of RIPK2 and P-gp inhibition on DTX-treated prostate cancer xenografts.

Fig 6

(A) P-gp and Ki67 expression in xenograft tumor tissues of the control, DTX, DTX + GSK583, and DTX+tariquidar groups. **P < 0.01. n = 3 in A. (B) Photographs of xenograft tumors in the control, DTX, DTX + GSK583, and DTX+tariquidar groups after 28 days of treatment. (C) Comparison of tumor volumes by group. (D) Comparison of tumor weights by group. **P < 0.01. n = 4 in B-D.

Inhibition of the RIPK2/P-gp signaling pathway enhances DTX sensitivity in PC-3/DTX xenograft tumors

Finally, we validated the role of the RIPK2/P-gp signaling pathway in DTX resistance using xenograft tumor experiments. The experimental results showed that DTX did not have a marked tumor-suppressing effect on PC-3/DTX xenograft tumors (Fig 6B-6D). GSK583 and tariquidar enhanced the sensitivity of PC-3/DTX xenograft tumors to DTX (Fig 6B-6D).

Discussion

RIPK2 plays a vital role in the progression of various tumors, including prostate cancer. Studies have shown that Serratia marcescens promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma xenograft tumor growth through the RIPK2-mediated activation of NF-κB [23]. RIPK2 is also involved in the regulation of gastric cancer tumor growth by inhibiting apoptosis [24]. The paired protein kinases PRKCI and RIPK2 promote pancreatic cancer growth and metastasis through activation of the JNK/ERK pathway via NF-κB phosphorylation [16]. Yan et al. [20] reported that RIPK2 is amplified in approximately 65% of metastatic prostate cancers, and its expression is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. Our TCGA analysis revealed that RIPK2 mRNA levels were upregulated in prostate cancer tissues. Consistently, RIPK2 expression positively correlated with prostate cancer Gleason scores. These results agree with those of previous studies. RIPK2 is associated with drug resistance in malignant tumors. RIPK2 is highly expressed in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines, and high RIPK2 expression is associated with paclitaxel resistance in plasmacytoid ovarian cancer [18]. Pan-cancer analyses revealed that RIPK2 exacerbates cytotoxic T-lymphocyte dysfunction and promotes resistance to immunotherapies through the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway and γ-interferon response [25]. Furthermore, RIPK2 contributes to temozolomide resistance by inducing stemness in glioma cells through the NF-κB signaling pathway [19]. These findings indicate that RIPK2 plays a role in chemotherapy and immunotherapy resistance in a variety of malignant tumors. Our study found that RIPK2 expression was elevated in 22RV1/DTX, C4-2/DTX, PC-3/DTX, and DU145/DTX prostate cancer cells, and silencing RIPK2 expression increased cell sensitivity to DTX. Additionally, RIPK2-overexpressing PC-3 cells showed decreased DTX sensitivity. These results suggested RIPK2 involvement in the resistance of prostate cancer cells to DTX.

NF-κB is part of a regulatory pathway involved in inflammatory response, and dysregulated NF-κB activity can lead to inflammation-related diseases and cancer; thus, it is a potential target for cancer therapy [26,27]. The NF-κB signaling pathway is downstream of RIP2, thereby mediating RIP2-induced cancer progression [28,29]. Thus, we examined the effects of varying RIPK2 expression in prostate cancer cells on the NF-κB signaling pathway. We found that RIPK2 overexpression induced upregulation of NF-κB P65 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation in PC-3 cells while downregulating the expression of the NF-κB-inhibiting protein IκBα. In contrast, silencing RIPK2 expression in PC-3/DTX cells reduced NF-κB P65 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation but upregulated IκBα expression. This suggests that RIPK2 activates the NF-κB signaling pathway in prostate cancer cells.

We further found that exogenous regulation of RIPK2 expression positively regulated P-gp expression. Additionally, NF-κB inhibition reversed the RIPK2-induced upregulation of P-gp expression in prostate cancer cells. It is suggested that RIPK2 regulates P-gp protein expression in prostate cancer cells through the NF-κB pathway. P-gp, an ATP-dependent transmembrane protein, has a large central pathway for drug binding and efflux into its transmembrane region [30,31]. Upregulation of P-gp expression in cancer cells enhances the efflux of chemotherapeutic drugs, thereby reducing drug accumulation in cancer cells and ultimately producing chemoresistance [32,33]. N-methylpretrichodermamide B enhances DTX sensitivity in drug-resistant prostate cancer cells by downregulating P-gp expression [34]. Spongian diterpenes demonstrated strong anti-proliferative effects in human DTX-resistant prostate cancer cells, and this effect was mainly attributed to the inhibition of P-gp-mediated drug efflux [35]. These results suggest that RIPK2/NF-κB-induced DTX resistance in our study may be associated with upregulated P-gp expression. We further validated the role of the RIPK2/NF-κB/P-gp pathway in DTX resistance using in vitro cellular experiments and xenograft tumor experiments. We found that inhibition of either RIPK2, NF-κB, or P-gp enhanced the sensitivity of PC-3/DTX and RIPK2-overexpressing PC-3 cells to DTX. Combining the RIPK2 inhibitor GSK583 or P-gp inhibitor tariquidar with DTX inhibited Ki67 expression (a marker of proliferation) and enhanced the growth-inhibiting effect of DTX on PC-3/DTX xenograft tumors. In addition, GSK583 inhibited P-gp expression in PC-3/DTX xenograft tumors. These results suggest that RIPK2 is involved in DTX resistance by upregulating P-gp expression through activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway.

In conclusion, RIPK2 expression is upregulated in prostate cancer, and its expression correlates with pathological grading. Our study revealed a potential mechanism by which RIPK2 regulates the resistance of prostate cancer cells to chemotherapy. RIPK2 activates the NF-κB pathway and upregulates P-gp protein expression, which in turn mediates DTX resistance (Fig 7). Thus, RIPK2 and its downstream signaling targets may serve as therapeutic targets for chemoresistant prostate cancers. However, the biological mechanism of action of RIPK2 in prostate cancer is not fully understood and requires further investigation.

Fig 7. Schematic diagram of the mechanism underlying RIPK2 inducing DTX resistance.

Fig 7

RIPK2 activates the NF-κB pathway and upregulates P-gp protein expression, which in turn mediates DTX resistance.

Supporting information

S1 File. Raw images.

(PDF)

pone.0341445.s001.pdf (199.1KB, pdf)
S2 File. Dataset supporting the experimental results of this study.

(PDF)

pone.0341445.s002.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project (TJYXZDXK-3-024C). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135(5):584–90. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sekhoacha M, Riet K, Motloung P, Gumenku L, Adegoke A, Mashele S. Prostate Cancer Review: Genetics, Diagnosis, Treatment Options, and Alternative Approaches. Molecules. 2022;27(17):5730. doi: 10.3390/molecules27175730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schaeffer EM, Srinivas S, Adra N, An Y, Barocas D, Bitting R, et al. Prostate Cancer, Version 4.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(10):1067–96. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Swami U, McFarland TR, Nussenzveig R, Agarwal N. Advanced Prostate Cancer: Treatment Advances and Future Directions. Trends Cancer. 2020;6(8):702–15. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Riaz IB, Sweeney CJ. The role of chemotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2022;32(3):292–301. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Balamayooran T, Batra S, Balamayooran G, Cai S, Kobayashi KS, Flavell RA, et al. Receptor-interacting protein 2 controls pulmonary host defense to Escherichia coli infection via the regulation of interleukin-17A. Infect Immun. 2011;79(11):4588–99. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05641-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jeong Y-J, Kang M-J, Lee S-J, Kim C-H, Kim J-C, Kim T-H, et al. Nod2 and Rip2 contribute to innate immune responses in mouse neutrophils. Immunology. 2014;143(2):269–76. doi: 10.1111/imm.12307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li X, Li Z, Zhu H, Yu X. Autophagy Regulatory Genes MET and RIPK2 Play a Prognostic Role in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Bioinformatic Analysis Based on GEO and TCGA. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8537381. doi: 10.1155/2020/8537381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li G, Xu Z, Peng J, Yan Y, Liu Y, Zhang X, et al. The RIPK family: expression profile and prognostic value in lung adenocarcinoma. Aging (Albany NY). 2022;14(14):5946–58. doi: 10.18632/aging.204195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li D, Tang L, Liu B, Xu S, Jin M, Bo W. RIPK2 is an unfavorable prognosis marker and a potential therapeutic target in human kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(7):10450–67. doi: 10.18632/aging.202808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jaafar RF, Ibrahim Z, Ataya K, Hassanieh J, Ard N, Faraj W. Receptor-Interacting Serine/Threonine-Protein Kinase-2 as a Potential Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(7):709. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang Z, Pan Y, Zhao Y, Ren M, Li Y, Lu G, et al. RIPK2 promotes the progression of colon cancer by regulating BIRC3-mediated ubiquitination of IKBKG. Exp Cell Res. 2023;429(1):113644. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2023.113644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang Q, Tian S, Liu Z, Dong W. Knockdown of RIPK2 Inhibits Proliferation and Migration, and Induces Apoptosis via the NF-κB Signaling Pathway in Gastric Cancer. Front Genet. 2021;12:627464. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.627464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang W, Wang Y. Activation of RIPK2-mediated NOD1 signaling promotes proliferation and invasion of ovarian cancer cells via NF-κB pathway. Histochem Cell Biol. 2022;157(2):173–82. doi: 10.1007/s00418-021-02055-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jiao J, Ruan L, Cheng C-S, Wang F, Yang P, Chen Z. Paired protein kinases PRKCI-RIPK2 promote pancreatic cancer growth and metastasis via enhancing NF-κB/JNK/ERK phosphorylation. Mol Med. 2023;29(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s10020-023-00648-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sang W, Zhou Y, Chen H, Yu C, Dai L, Liu Z, et al. Receptor-interacting Protein Kinase 2 Is an Immunotherapy Target in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2024;14(2):326–47. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-23-0584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shen Y, Lin H, Chen K, Ge W, Xia D, Wu Y, et al. High expression of RIPK2 is associated with Taxol resistance in serous ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2022;15(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13048-022-00986-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang X-L, Jiao B-H, Wu J-L, Yang J-K, Hu Y-H, Cui K. Mechanism of RIP2 enhancing stemness of glioma cells induces temozolomide resistance. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022;28(12):2319–30. doi: 10.1111/cns.13981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yan Y, Zhou B, Qian C, Vasquez A, Kamra M, Chatterjee A, et al. Receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIPK2) stabilizes c-Myc and is a therapeutic target in prostate cancer metastasis. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):669. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28340-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Elmeliegy M, Vourvahis M, Guo C, Wang DD. Effect of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) Inducers on Exposure of P-gp Substrates: Review of Clinical Drug-Drug Interaction Studies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59(6):699–714. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00867-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guan Y, Lei H, Xing C, Yan B, Lin B, Yang X, et al. Multimodal Nanoplatform with ROS Amplification to Overcome Multidrug Resistance in Prostate Cancer via Targeting P-Glycoprotein and Ferroptosis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(3):e2301345. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202301345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nomoto D, Baba Y, Liu Y, Tsutsuki H, Okadome K, Harada K, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression via the NOD1/RIPK2/NF-κB pathway. Cancer Lett. 2022;530:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang Q, Hong K, Li Y, Shi P, Yan F, Zhang P. Receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 is associated with tumor immune infiltration, immunotherapy-related biomarkers, and affects gastric cancer cells growth in vivo. J Cancer. 2024;15(1):176–91. doi: 10.7150/jca.90008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Song J, Yang R, Wei R, Du Y, He P, Liu X. Pan-cancer analysis reveals RIPK2 predicts prognosis and promotes immune therapy resistance via triggering cytotoxic T lymphocytes dysfunction. Mol Med. 2022;28(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s10020-022-00475-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mirzaei S, Saghari S, Bassiri F, Raesi R, Zarrabi A, Hushmandi K, et al. NF-κB as a regulator of cancer metastasis and therapy response: A focus on epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Cell Physiol. 2022;237(7):2770–95. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cornice J, Verzella D, Arboretto P, Vecchiotti D, Capece D, Zazzeroni F, et al. NF-κB: Governing Macrophages in Cancer. Genes (Basel). 2024;15(2):197. doi: 10.3390/genes15020197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang D, Chen J, Li R, Wu G, Sun Z, Wang Z, et al. PAX5 interacts with RIP2 to promote NF-κB activation and drug-resistance in B-lymphoproliferative disorders. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(11):2261–72. doi: 10.1242/jcs.183889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cai X, Yang Y, Xia W, Kong H, Wang M, Fu W, et al. RIP2 promotes glioma cell growth by regulating TRAF3 and activating the NF‑κB and p38 signaling pathways. Oncol Rep. 2018;39(6):2915–23. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ding Y, Fan J, Fan Z, Zhang K. γ-Tocotrienol reverses multidrug resistance of breast cancer cells through the regulation of the γ-Tocotrienol-NF-κB-P-gp axis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2021;209:105835. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2021.105835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Braconi L, Teodori E, Riganti C, Coronnello M, Nocentini A, Bartolucci G, et al. New Dual P-Glycoprotein (P-gp) and Human Carbonic Anhydrase XII (hCA XII) Inhibitors as Multidrug Resistance (MDR) Reversers in Cancer Cells. J Med Chem. 2022;65(21):14655–72. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang H, Xu H, Ashby CR Jr, Assaraf YG, Chen Z-S, Liu H-M. Chemical molecular-based approach to overcome multidrug resistance in cancer by targeting P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Med Res Rev. 2021;41(1):525–55. doi: 10.1002/med.21739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Md S, Alhakamy NA, Sharma P, Ansari MS, Gorain B. Nanocarrier-based co-delivery approaches of chemotherapeutics with natural P-glycoprotein inhibitors in the improvement of multidrug resistance cancer therapy. J Drug Target. 2022;30(8):801–18. doi: 10.1080/1061186X.2022.2069782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dyshlovoy SA, Busenbender T, Hauschild J, Girich EV, Kriegs M, Hoffer K, et al. Cytotoxic N-Methylpretrichodermamide B Reveals Anticancer Activity and Inhibits P-Glycoprotein in Drug-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells. Mar Drugs. 2022;20(10):597. doi: 10.3390/md20100597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dyshlovoy SA, Shubina LK, Makarieva TN, Hauschild J, Strewinsky N, Guzii AG, et al. New diterpenes from the marine sponge Spongionella sp. overcome drug resistance in prostate cancer by inhibition of P-glycoprotein. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):13570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17447-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Saki Raheem

15 Oct 2025

Dear Dr. Liu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 29 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Saki Raheem, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“This work was supported by the Tianjin Key Medical Discipline(Specialty) Construction Project.”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

Additional Editor Comments:

The manuscript investigates the role of RIPK2 in mediating docetaxel (DTX) resistance in prostate cancer, proposing a mechanism via NF-kB activation and upregulation of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). The study includes in vitro experiments, TCGA dataset analysis, and xenograft models. The topic is relevant to therapeutic resistance in prostate cancer and fits PLOS ONE's emphasis on scientific rigour. However, several clarifications and improvements are needed before the manuscript can be considered for publication.

1. TCGA/UALCAN analysis- clarification needed:

The use of the UALCAN portal for TCGA analysis is appropriate, but a few reporting details would improve transparency and reproducibility. In particular, please indicate: How many tumour and normal samples were included? What statistical test did UALCAN apply, and how were the Gleason score groups defined?

If default UALCAN settings were used, a brief statement to that effect would be sufficient.

2. Please indicate whether in vitro data (e.g., IC50) were based on biological triplicates, and how many replicates were performed.

3. The in vivo experiments are generally well described, but to meet PLOS ONE and ARRIVE reporting standards, a few brief clarifications would improve transparency and reproducibility.

  • Please specify the number of animals per group in the Methods

  • Indicate whether randomisation was used when assigning mice to treatment groups.

  • State whether blinding was applied during tumour measurement or analysis (or clarify if not performed).

  • Briefly note the monitoring frequency and any humane endpoint criteria used before the scheduled sacrifice.

  • clarify the nature of the control treatment/vehicle given to the drug-control group.

These additions would align the manuscript with ARRIVE  expectations without requiring new experiments.

4. Writing and Style: Minor language edits would improve clarity and consistency. There are occasional tense shifts and missing articles. The introduction is also quite long and could be streamlined to avoid repetition. A light language edit would help polish the text.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: I am writing to provide feedback on the manuscript titled " RIPK2 induces docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer through the NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway " (PONE-D-25-24339) which I understand is under consideration for publication. After a thorough review, I have identified several areas that could benefit from further attention to enhance the overall quality and impact of the paper.

References and Citations: It is crucial to ensure uniformity in the formatting of all references and citations, adhering to the required style guide. Consistency in this aspect upholds the manuscript's professionalism.

Clarity and Conciseness: The manuscript would benefit from a focus on clear and concise communication. Avoiding excessive jargon and simplifying complex ideas will make the paper more accessible to a broader audience.

Data Presentation: I recommend a review of how figures and tables are integrated into the paper. They should be clearly labeled and directly referenced in the text, ensuring they effectively support the paper's conclusions.

Logical Flow: Ensuring a coherent flow throughout the paper, with seamless transitions between sections, is key to keeping the reader engaged and ensuring the paper is easily understandable.

Abstract and Conclusion: These sections should succinctly summarize the main findings and their significance. It is important to avoid overstating results or generalizations not supported by the data.

Consistency in Terminology: Uniform use of technical terms throughout the manuscript is essential for clarity and to avoid potential confusion among readers.

Objective Language: Maintaining an objective tone throughout the paper is crucial. Subjective or evaluative language should be reserved for discussing hypotheses or theoretical frameworks.

Compliance with Journal Guidelines: Finally, ensuring that the manuscript aligns with the journal's specific guidelines in terms of formatting, submission, and ethics will facilitate a smoother review and publication process.

I trust these suggestions will be valuable in enhancing the manuscript's effectiveness and suitability for publication. Thank you for the opportunity to review this work.

Sincerely,

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS atfigures@plos.org

PLoS One. 2026 Jan 21;21(1):e0341445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341445.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


6 Nov 2025

2025/11/05

Dear Editor and Reviewers:

Thank you very much for your time and constructive comments on our manuscript entitled " RIPK2 induces docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer through the NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway". We greatly appreciate the valuable suggestions, which have helped us significantly improve the quality of this work. According to the reviewers' comments, we have carefully revised the manuscript and addressed all the concerns raised. The main revisions are summarized as follows, and detailed responses to each comment are provided below. We hope the revised version meets the publication standards of PLOS ONE.

Sincerely,

Qian Liu

Department of Urology, First Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, No. 24, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300190, China. +86 18963106651

simonlq1971@126.com

Journal Requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Reply: We have reviewed the manuscript according to the formatting requirements and file naming conventions specified by PLOS ONE.

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“This work was supported by the Tianjin Key Medical Discipline(Specialty) Construction Project.”

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Reply: We have incorporated the revised statement of the funding agency's role into the cover letter.

3. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

Reply: The blot/gel image data are included in the Supplementary Materials. We have supplemented the relevant information in the cover letter.

Additional Editor Comments:

The manuscript investigates the role of RIPK2 in mediating docetaxel (DTX) resistance in prostate cancer, proposing a mechanism via NF-kB activation and upregulation of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). The study includes in vitro experiments, TCGA dataset analysis, and xenograft models. The topic is relevant to therapeutic resistance in prostate cancer and fits PLOS ONE's emphasis on scientific rigour. However, several clarifications and improvements are needed before the manuscript can be considered for publication.

1. TCGA/UALCAN analysis- clarification needed:

The use of the UALCAN portal for TCGA analysis is appropriate, but a few reporting details would improve transparency and reproducibility. In particular, please indicate: How many tumour and normal samples were included? What statistical test did UALCAN apply, and how were the Gleason score groups defined?

If default UALCAN settings were used, a brief statement to that effect would be sufficient.

Reply: We have incorporated the number of cases used in the TCGA/UALCAN analysis into the ‘Materials and Methods’ section. Additionally, we performed Gleason score grouping and statistical analysis using default settings, with supplementary descriptions provided in the manuscript.

2. Please indicate whether in vitro data (e.g., IC50) were based on biological triplicates, and how many replicates were performed.

Reply: In vitro data (e.g., IC50 values) were based on biological triplicate experiments, with each biological replicate performed in at least three technical repeats to ensure reproducibility. We have supplemented the relevant descriptions in the manuscript.

3. The in vivo experiments are generally well described, but to meet PLOS ONE and ARRIVE reporting standards, a few brief clarifications would improve transparency and reproducibility.

Please specify the number of animals per group in the Methods

Indicate whether randomisation was used when assigning mice to treatment groups.

State whether blinding was applied during tumour measurement or analysis (or clarify if not performed).

Briefly note the monitoring frequency and any humane endpoint criteria used before the scheduled sacrifice.

clarify the nature of the control treatment/vehicle given to the drug-control group.

These additions would align the manuscript with ARRIVE expectations without requiring new experiments.

Reply: We have supplemented the relevant descriptions in the manuscript.

4. Writing and Style: Minor language edits would improve clarity and consistency. There are occasional tense shifts and missing articles. The introduction is also quite long and could be streamlined to avoid repetition. A light language edit would help polish the text.

Reply: We have invited native English speakers with academic writing experience to polish the manuscript, focusing on optimizing language fluency, correcting grammatical errors, and refining academic expression to meet the journal’s standards.

Reviewers' comments:

5. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: I am writing to provide feedback on the manuscript titled " RIPK2 induces docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer through the NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway " (PONE-D-25-24339) which I understand is under consideration for publication. After a thorough review, I have identified several areas that could benefit from further attention to enhance the overall quality and impact of the paper.

References and Citations: It is crucial to ensure uniformity in the formatting of all references and citations, adhering to the required style guide. Consistency in this aspect upholds the manuscript's professionalism.

Reply: We have verified the references and citations.

Clarity and Conciseness: The manuscript would benefit from a focus on clear and concise communication. Avoiding excessive jargon and simplifying complex ideas will make the paper more accessible to a broader audience.

Reply: We have invited native English speakers with academic writing experience to polish the manuscript, focusing on optimizing language fluency, correcting grammatical errors, and refining academic expression to meet the journal’s standards.

Data Presentation: I recommend a review of how figures and tables are integrated into the paper. They should be clearly labeled and directly referenced in the text, ensuring they effectively support the paper's conclusions.

Reply: We have systematically reviewed the manuscript data to identify and eliminate potential errors, including data entry inconsistencies, statistical calculation discrepancies, and figure caption mismatches.

Logical Flow: Ensuring a coherent flow throughout the paper, with seamless transitions between sections, is key to keeping the reader engaged and ensuring the paper is easily understandable.

Reply: We have reviewed and checked the entire text.

Abstract and Conclusion: These sections should succinctly summarize the main findings and their significance. It is important to avoid overstating results or generalizations not supported by the data.

Reply: We have reviewed and confirmed the abstract and conclusions.

Consistency in Terminology: Uniform use of technical terms throughout the manuscript is essential for clarity and to avoid potential confusion among readers.

Reply: We have reviewed and checked the entire text.

Objective Language: Maintaining an objective tone throughout the paper is crucial. Subjective or evaluative language should be reserved for discussing hypotheses or theoretical frameworks.

Reply: We have reviewed and checked the entire text.

Compliance with Journal Guidelines: Finally, ensuring that the manuscript aligns with the journal's specific guidelines in terms of formatting, submission, and ethics will facilitate a smoother review and publication process.

Reply: We have checked the manuscript against the journal guidelines.

I trust these suggestions will be valuable in enhancing the manuscript's effectiveness and suitability for publication. Thank you for the opportunity to review this work.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0341445.s003.docx (22.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Saki Raheem

9 Dec 2025

Dear Dr. Liu,

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 23 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jianhong Zhou

Staff Editor

PLOS One

Saki Raheem, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: I am writing to provide feedback on the manuscript titled "RIPK2 induces docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer through the NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway" which I understand is under consideration for publication.

The comments raised have been corrected and are acceptable.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes: Mohsen Rashidi

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

PLoS One. 2026 Jan 21;21(1):e0341445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341445.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


18 Dec 2025

2025/12/11

Dear Editor:

We thank the editors and reviewers for all their efforts in reviewing the manuscript. In response to the comments raised in the second round of review, we hereby provide detailed data regarding the maximum tumor size in our xenograft experiments. None of the xenograft tumors exceeded 10% of the host mice’s body weight, which is in strict compliance with the ethical guidelines for animal experiments. The largest tumor, with a volume of 1991.23 mm³ and a weight of 1.321 g, accounted for only 4.98% of the corresponding mouse’s body weight (26.5 g). It should be noted that tumor volume measurements might be slightly overestimated due to the irregular morphology of xenograft tumors; however, the overall results are consistent with our experimental expectations.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Qian Liu

Department of Urology, First Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, No. 24, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300190, China. +86 18963106651

simonlq1971@126.com

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

pone.0341445.s004.docx (16.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Saki Raheem

22 Dec 2025

Dear Dr. Liu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 05 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Miquel Vall-llosera Camps

Senior Staff Editor

PLOS One

Saki Raheem, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

2. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Comments from the Editorial Staff:

Thank you for your response to our previous requests. At this time, please provide the complete data points underlying Figure 6C, to confirm that 1991.23 being the largest tumour size is correct, given that the error bars appear to indicate otherwise.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

PLoS One. 2026 Jan 21;21(1):e0341445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341445.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 3


23 Dec 2025

2025/12/23

Dear Editor:

We thank the editors and reviewers for all their efforts in reviewing the manuscript. In response to the comments raised in the second round of review, we hereby provide detailed data regarding the maximum tumor size in our xenograft experiments. None of the xenograft tumors exceeded 10% of the host mice’s body weight, which is in strict compliance with the ethical guidelines for animal experiments. The largest tumor, with a volume of 1991.23 mm³ and a weight of 1.321 g, accounted for only 4.98% of the corresponding mouse’s body weight (26.5 g). It should be noted that tumor volume measurements might be slightly overestimated due to the irregular morphology of xenograft tumors; however, the overall results are consistent with our experimental expectations.

We have uploaded the detailed data on tumor volumes in each group (Day 28) under the “Other” section. Please refer to this dataset.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Qian Liu

Department of Urology, First Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, No. 24, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300190, China. +86 18963106651

simonlq1971@126.com

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_3.docx

pone.0341445.s005.docx (17.1KB, docx)

Decision Letter 3

Saki Raheem

7 Jan 2026

RIPK2 induces docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer through the NF-κB/P-gp signaling pathway

PONE-D-25-24339R3

Dear Dr. Liu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Saki Raheem, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Acceptance letter

Saki Raheem

PONE-D-25-24339R3

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Liu,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Saki Raheem

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Raw images.

    (PDF)

    pone.0341445.s001.pdf (199.1KB, pdf)
    S2 File. Dataset supporting the experimental results of this study.

    (PDF)

    pone.0341445.s002.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0341445.s003.docx (22.2KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

    pone.0341445.s004.docx (16.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_3.docx

    pone.0341445.s005.docx (17.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES