Skip to main content
Frontiers in Public Health logoLink to Frontiers in Public Health
. 2026 Jan 8;13:1661344. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1661344

A cross-sectional study on clinical vigilance in the diagnosis and treatment of listeriosis among pregnant women and their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding listeriosis in Gansu Province, China

Wen-Xuan Lin 1, Kai-Li Wang 1, Xiang-Lai Sang 1, Zhen-Yin Shi 1, Xiao-Cheng Liang 1,*
PMCID: PMC12823871  PMID: 41584175

Abstract

Background

Listeriosis is a serious foodborne disease that threatens the health of pregnant women and their fetuses. Gansu Province, in northwest China, is economically underdeveloped and covers a large geographic area. No population-based studies on listeriosis have been conducted there. In 2022, Gansu added listeriosis to its foodborne disease surveillance system and started a pilot program at five tertiary hospitals in four cities. By the end of 2024, 13 confirmed cases had been reported, including three linked to pregnancy: one miscarriage and two preterm births at 27 weeks and 34 weeks plus 2 days, respectively.

Objectives

This study aims to assess the clinical vigilance for listeriosis in Gansu Province and to investigate pregnant women’s knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding the disease.

Methods

Eight tertiary hospitals were selected as research sites. A convenience sampling method was used to survey 207 physicians from obstetrics, emergency medicine, and gastroenterology departments, along with 589 pregnant women receiving prenatal care. Descriptive statistics were generated using WPS Office 10.8.0, while SPSS 21.0 was employed for ANOVA, Spearman correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression modeling.

Results

The proportion of physicians who had treated listeriosis patients and those who had participated in relevant training was identical at 14.98%. Failure to diagnose the disease was identified as the primary reason for underreporting among clinicians. A low percentage of physicians were aware of foods commonly contaminated by Listeria monocytogenes, as well as the main clinical symptoms and recommended treatment options for listeriosis. Over half of the surveyed pregnant women reported cleaning their refrigerators no more than twice per year, consumed high-risk foods within 4 weeks prior to the survey, and failed to separate raw and cooked foods on cutting boards at home. Pregnant women with lower-educated pregnant women showed higher rates of using the same cutting board for raw and cooked foods and poor handwashing habits. All differences were statistically significant (χ2 = 13.177, 9.939; all p < 0.05), Those first-time pregnant women were more likely to eat at mobile food stalls, consume high-risk foods, and clean refrigerators≤2 times/year than non-first-time mothers (χ2 = 4.267, 10.436, 14.150; all p < 0.05). Higher overall scores on listeriosis-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors were associated with advanced maternal age, higher education level, increased family income, later gestational stage, and being a first-time mother.

Conclusion

Clinical vigilance for listeriosis diagnosis and treatment among physicians in tertiary hospitals remains limited. Pregnant women exhibit low awareness of listeriosis and engage in high-risk behaviors at elevated rates.

Keywords: listeriosis, physicians, diagnosis and treatment, pregnant women, knowledge-attitude-practice survey

1. Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes (LM), the main causative agent of human listeriosis, a highly pathogenic intracellular bacterium that demonstrates the characteristics of psychrotrophic growth and flagellum-mediated motility (1). Individuals with compromised immune systems are particularly susceptible to infection (2). Elevated progesterone levels and reduced cellular immunity increase the risk of invasive LM infection during pregnancy. Pregnant women have a 10–20 times higher risk of contracting listeriosis from consuming LM-contaminated food compared to the general population (3), and more than 100 times higher risk than non-pregnant women of reproductive age (4). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 43% of all reported listeriosis cases occur during pregnancy, with 14% occurring in the third trimester (5). LM can cross the placental barrier, leading to bacteremia in pregnant women and potentially causing severe adverse pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriage, stillbirth, and neonatal infection. From 1964 to 2010, 46 pregnancy-related listeriosis cases were documented in literature in China, while from 2010 to 2023, 482 cases were reported, with neonatal mortality rates of 46 and 27.1%, respectively (6). Despite being a notifiable disease in countries like the United States, Canada, and some EU nations, listeriosis remains non-notifiable in China. Notably, an estimated 99% of listeriosis cases in China are transmitted through food (7). The clinical presentation of listeriosis lacks specificity (8), and blood cultures are positive in only 36% of symptomatic pregnant patients (9), making diagnosis challenging and increasing the likelihood of missed or misdiagnosed cases (10, 11). Therefore, enhancing clinicians’ vigilance of listeriosis, initiating early antimicrobial coverage for LM, and promoting timely detection and treatment are crucial for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, health education targeting pregnant women plays a vital role in disease prevention. The investigation aims to assess the clinical vigilance for listeriosis and evaluate pregnant women’s knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in Gansu Province, with the ultimate goal of informing and enhancing listeriosis surveillance and public prevention education. The study integrates on-site survey administration with targeted health education delivered to pregnant women after completing the questionnaire.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Participants

Eight tertiary medical institutions were randomly selected across Gansu Province, located in Lanzhou, Qingyang, Wuwei, and Dingxi cities, including three listeriosis monitoring sentinel hospitals. The study population included doctors from the departments of obstetrics, emergency medicine, and gastroenterology, as well as pregnant women receiving prenatal care between September and December 2023.

2.2. Sample size determination

Physicians: 220 actively practicing physicians from the departments of obstetrics, emergency medicine, and gastroenterology who provided informed consent. Pregnant women cohort: the sample size was calculated based on an assumed listeriosis vigilance rate of 7.78%, derived from reported prevalence data in Beijing, with a z-score (μα/2) of 1.96, a margin of error (δ) of 0.05, and a design effect (deff) of 1.5. The minimum required sample size was calculated to be 578, ultimately, 589 participants were enrolled to ensure sufficient statistical power.

2.3. Survey instruments

Physician assessment questionnaire: Demographic and professional characteristics (institution, department, educational attainment, professional rank); Clinical experience with listeriosis; Knowledge assessment parameters; Therapeutic approaches; Professional training history; Diagnostic challenges and barriers.

Pregnancy KAP (Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices) questionnaire: section 1: Demographic profile (age, occupation, education level, household income, parity, gestational age); section 2: Knowledge evaluation (6 items, dichotomous scoring, maximum six points); section 3: Attitude assessment (four items, 3-point Likert scale: positive = 2, neutral = 1, negative = 0, maximum eight points); section 4: Behavioral practices (nine items, binary scoring: safe practice = 1, high-risk behavior = 0, maximum nine points). Note: Multiple-response items were scored as incorrect (0) for any wrong selection, and correct (1) for complete or partially correct responses.

The survey was implemented utilizing convenience sampling with face-to-face questionnaire administration.

2.4. Quality assurance protocol

The principal investigator supervised all field operations. Standardized training was delivered to survey staff at all study sites prior to data collection. Quality control measures were implemented as follows:

  1. Pre-analysis questionnaire screening for completeness and logical consistency.

  2. Double data entry using Epidata software with consistency verification.

  3. Random audit of 10% of the questionnaires to ensure data accuracy.

2.5. Statistical analysis

Data were exported from Epidata and analyzed using SPSS 21.0. Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x ± s), while non-normally distributed measurement data were presented as median and interquartile range [M (P25–P75)]. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages (%). Group comparisons of categorical variables were conducted using the chi-square test, with Yates’ continuity correction applied where appropriate. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between non-parametric continuous variables. A multiple linear regression model was performed to explore the factors influencing pregnant women’s knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding listeriosis, and corresponding regression coefficients were estimated. Variables were included in the model based on an entry criterion of α < 0.05. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed p value less than 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Results of physicians

3.1.1. Characteristics

A total of 220 physicians were surveyed on-site, with 207 valid questionnaires collected, resulting in a recovery rate of 94.1%. The majority of the participants held a bachelor’s degree, representing 70.53% (146/207). The professional titles of “Resident physician” and “Attending physician” accounted for 41.06% (85/207) and 39.13% (81/207), respectively. Among the respondents, 14.98% (31/207) had clinical experience treating patients with Listeria (Physicians with prior experience managing listeriosis cases includes those who encountered such patients not only at their current institution but also during training/rotations at other hospitals), and an equal proportion (14.98%, 31/207) reported having participated in relevant training programs. Failure to diagnose listeriosis was identified as the primary reason for underreporting (The failure to diagnose represents a subjective judgment made by the investigated physician, indicating that the physician perceived a lack of vigilanceregarding the disease), cited by 63.29% (131/207) of the respondents. Additionally, 85.02% (176/207) of the physicians indicated that they had not attended any listeriosis-related training or academic conferences within the past 2 years (Figure 1 and Table 1 for detailed information).

Figure 1.

Bar chart displaying the number of physicians in various categories. Departments: Obstetrics and Gynecology (96), Emergency Medicine (71), Gastroenterology (40). Education levels: Master’s degree or higher (55), Bachelor’s degree (146), Associate degree (6). Professional titles: Chief Physician (41), Attending Physician (81), Resident Physician (85). Experience with Listeriosis: Yes (31), No (176). Participation in Listeriosis training: Yes (31), No (176). Factors hindering Listeriosis reporting: Underdiagnosis (131), Lack of hospital testing capabilities (52), Other reasons (24).

Demographic characteristics of physicians (n).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of physicians n (%).

Characteristics Groups n (%)
Department Obstetrics and gynecology 96(46.38)
Emergency medicine 71(34.30)
Gastroenterology 40(19.32)
Highest education level Master’s degree or higher 55(26.57)
Bachelor’s degree 146(70.53)
Associate degree 6(2.90)
Professional title Chief physician 41(19.81)
Associate chief physician 28(13.53)
Attending physician 81(39.13)
Resident physician 85(41.06)
Prior experience with listeriosis cases Yes 31(14.98)
No 176(85.02)
Participation in listeriosis-related training Yes 31(14.98)
No 176(85.02)
Factors hindering listeriosis reporting Underdiagnosis 131(63.29)
Lack of hospital testing capabilities 52(25.12)
Other reasons 24(11.59)

3.1.2. Physicians’ knowledge and treatment practices regarding listeriosis in pregnant women

Among the 207 physicians surveyed on-site, 46.86% (97/207) were aware of the high-risk populations for listeriosis, 27.54% (57/207) had knowledge of the treatment options for listeriosis, 26.57% (55/207) were aware of food items commonly associated with LM contamination, and 24.15% (50/207) recognized the primary clinical symptoms of listeriosis in patients (Figure 2 and Table 2 for further details).

Figure 2.

Bar chart showing physicians' responses about listeriosis risks. For high-risk populations, 97 correct and 110 wrong answers. For contaminated foods, 57 correct and 150 wrong; 55 correct and 152 wrong; 50 correct and 157 wrong. Correct answers are dark green, wrong answers are light green.

Listeriosis knowledge assessment among surveyed physicians (n).

Table 2.

Listeriosis knowledge assessment among surveyed physicians n (%).

Assessment item Number of correct answers Knowledge rate (%)
Listeriosis high-risk populations 97 46.86
Listeriosis treatment options 57 27.54
LM-contaminated foods 55 26.57
Listeriosis primary clinical symptoms 50 24.15

3.2. Results of pregnant women

3.2.1. Characteristics

This study conducted on-site investigations among 663 pregnant women and collected 589 valid questionnaires, achieving a questionnaire recovery rate of 88.84%. The age range of the participants was 18–49 years, with 49.58% (292/589) falling within the 30–39 age group. Participants with postgraduate, undergraduate, or junior college degrees made up the largest group, accounting for 68.42% (403/589). Approximately half of the participants (50.25%, 296/589) reported a combined monthly household income between 5,000 and 10,000 Chinese Yuan. The ratio of first-time pregnancies to previous pregnancies was 1.04:1. Additionally, 51.10% (301/589) of the respondents were in their third trimester of pregnancy (Figure 3 and Table 3 for detailed information).

Figure 3.

Bar chart showcasing pregnant women categorized by age, education level, monthly income, pregnancy history, and gestational age. Each category displays different colored bars representing the number of women. Most pregnant women are aged eighteen to thirty-nine, have a college degree, earn between two thousand and four thousand nine hundred ninety-nine yuan, are pregnant for the first time, and are in their twelfth to twenty-seventh week of gestation.

Pregnant participants demographics (n).

Table 3.

Pregnant participants demographics n (%).

Characteristics Groups n (%)
Age (years) 18–29 289(49.07)
30–39 292(49.58)
≥40 8(1.36)
Education level College/university 403(68.42)
High school/vocational 121(20.54)
Middle school or below 65(11.04)
Monthly household income (¥) <2,000 40(6.79)
2,000–4,999 162(27.50)
5,000–9,999 296(50.25)
≥10,000 91(15.45)
Pregnancy history Pregnant for the first time 300(50.93)
Pregnant before 289(49.07)
Gestational age (weeks) <12 61(10.36)
12–27 227(38.54)
≥28 301(51.10)

3.2.2. Awareness of listeriosis among pregnant women

Among the pregnant women surveyed, only 23.09% (136/589) had heard of or possessed some knowledge about the disease. Of the respondents, 20.37% were aware that listeriosis is caused by consuming food contaminated with LM. A smaller proportion (16.30%) correctly identified high-risk food items, including cooked meat products, Chinese-style cold dishes, raw fruits and vegetables, and Machine-made ice cream. Additionally, 15.96% understood that LM can survive and proliferate in refrigerated environments. Only 15.28% recognized that pregnant women are at higher risk for LM infection compared to the general population. Furthermore, 14.26% were aware that LM infection during pregnancy may result in serious complications such as miscarriage, preterm delivery, stillbirth, or neonatal meningitis. Detailed data are presented in Table 4 and illustrated in Figure 4.

Table 4.

Knowledge of listeriosis among pregnant women n (%).

Knowledge item Correct response(n) %
Have heard or knew about listeriosis? 136 23.09
Did you know that listeriosis is caused by consuming food contaminated with LM? 120 20.37
Do you know the high-risk foods for listeriosis? 96 16.30
Is LM capable of surviving and proliferating within the crisper compartment of a refrigerator? 94 15.96
pregnant women are more susceptible to LM than others? 90 15.28
Can pregnant women infected with LM lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes? 84 14.26
Figure 4.

Bar chart showing the number of correct (light blue) and wrong (dark blue) responses from pregnant women on knowledge about Listeriosis, across six questions. The highest incorrect response is 136 for awareness of Listeriosis, while the lowest is 20 for food contamination knowledge. Correct responses range from 453 to 505.

Knowledge of listeriosis among pregnant women.

3.2.3. Maternal attitudes toward listeriosis prevention

Pregnant women demonstrate a generally positive attitude toward listeriosis prevention. Specifically, 94.40% of the participants expressed willingness to pay increased attention to food safety after getting pregnant, and 91.34% indicated readiness to acquire knowledge regarding food safety during pregnancy. Additionally, 88.12% reported they would seek medical care promptly if symptoms such as diarrhea or fever occurred during pregnancy. However, only 73.17% were willing to undergo LM testing when visiting healthcare providers, indicating a relatively lower acceptance rate for this preventive measure (Figure 5 and Table 5).

Figure 5.

Bar chart showing responses from pregnant women. Four categories are represented with two sets of bars each, indicating positive and negative responses. Categories: attention to food safety, learning about food safety knowledge, seeking medical care for pregnancy-related symptoms, and undergoing necessary tests. Positive responses are significantly higher in all categories.

Pregnancy attitudes regarding listeriosis prevention.

Table 5.

Pregnancy attitudes regarding listeriosis prevention.

Preventive behaviors Positive responses (n) %
Be willing to pay more attention to food safety after getting pregnant 556 94.40
Willing to learn about food safety knowledge related to pregnancy 538 91.34
Would seek prompt medical care for pregnancy-related symptoms during pregnancy, such as diarrhea or fever 519 88.12
Be willing to undergo necessary LM tests conducted by doctors when seeking medical treatment 431 73.17

3.2.4. High-risk behaviors related to listeriosis among pregnant women

Among the surveyed pregnant women, 62.99% of households clean their refrigerators no more than twice per year and 28.86% fail to maintain separation in refrigerators; Additionally, 53.82% reported consuming high-risk LM foods within the 4 weeks prior to the survey, Furthermore, 17.83% have consumed leftover meals from the refrigerator that were not adequately reheated, and 7.47% consume at least one daily meal at roadside or mobile food vendors. In terms of hygiene practices, 52.12% of households do not separate raw and cooked foods on cutting boards, 21.05% of pregnant women or their family members do not wash hands after handling raw meat before proceeding with other cooking steps (see Figure 6 and Table 6).

Figure 6.

A vertical bar chart depicting the number of responses and non-responses from pregnant women on several food safety habits. Categories include cleaning refrigerators, storing raw and cooked foods together, consuming high-risk foods, eating meals from street vendors, using the same cutting board for raw and cooked foods, and not handwashing after raw meat handling. Each bar is divided into yellow (responses) and orange (non-responses) sections. Most categories show a higher number of responses than non-responses.

Listeriosis risk behaviors in pregnancy n (%).

Table 6.

Listeriosis risk behaviors in pregnancy n (%).

Risk behavior Responses (n) %
Clean refrigerator ≤2 times/year 371 62.99
Store raw/cooked foods together in refrigerator 170 28.86
Ate high-risk foods in past 4 weeks 317 53.82
Consumed improperly reheated leftovers 105 17.83
Ate ≥1 meal/day from street vendors 44 7.47
Use same cutting board for raw/cooked foods 307 52.12
No handwashing after handling raw meat 124 21.05

3.2.5. Comparison of high-risk behaviors among pregnant women across different characteristics

Pregnant women with higher education levels were more likely to engage in high-risk behaviors such as consuming high-risk foods and cleaning refrigerators ≤2 times/year in the 4 weeks before the survey, compared to those with lower education levels. In contrast, lower-educated pregnant women showed higher rates of using the same cutting board for raw and cooked foods and poor handwashing habits. All differences were statistically significant (χ2 = 13.920, 7.901, 13.177, 9.939; all p < 0.05).

Five high-risk behaviors—including eating at roadside or mobile food stalls, consuming inadequately reheated leftovers, infrequent refrigerator cleaning, not washing hands after handling raw meat, cross-contamination on cutting boards—differed significantly across income groups (χ2 = 12.708, 23.402, 9.427, 34.838, 18.765; all p < 0.05).

First-time pregnant women were more likely to eat at mobile food stalls, consume high-risk foods, and clean refrigerators≤2 times/year than non-first-time mothers (χ2 = 4.267, 10.436, 14.150; all p < 0.05). Conversely, non-first-time mothers had a higher rate of consuming underheated leftovers (χ2 = 5.094; p = 0.036). Pregnant women in the first trimester were more likely to eat at mobile food stalls than those in the second or third trimesters (χ2 = 9.925; p = 0.031) (see Supplementary Table 1).

3.2.6. Correlation analysis of knowledge, attitude, and behavior related to listeriosis among pregnant women

The average total score for listeriosis related knowledge, attitude, and behavior among pregnant women was 15.52 ± 2.953, with a maximum score of 23 and a minimum score of 7. The median scores (interquartile range) for knowledge, attitude, and behavior were [0 (0–2)], [8 (7–8)], and [7 (5.5–8)], respectively. Spearman correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between knowledge and attitude (r = 0.182, p < 0.001), as well as a weaker but still significant correlation between knowledge and behavior (r = 0.094, p = 0.022). However, no significant correlation was observed between attitude and behavior (r = −0.038, p = 0.053).

3.2.7. Analysis of influencing factors on knowledge, attitude, and behavior regarding listeriosis among pregnant women

A multiple linear stepwise regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between the overall scores of knowledge, attitude, and behavior regarding listeriosis among pregnant women and selected sociodemographic factors, including age, educational level, family income, gestational age, and parity (whether it was their first pregnancy). The results indicated that all of these factors had a statistically significant influence on the overall score. Specifically, higher scores were associated with older maternal age, higher educational level, greater family income, more advanced gestational age, and being a primiparous woman (first-time mother). The derived linear regression equation is as follows: Y = 8.859 + 0.888X₁ + 0.420X2 + 0.319X3 + 0.424X4 + 0.079X5.

4. Discussion

China launched a nationwide pilot surveillance program for listeriosis across six provinces /municipalities in 2013. Data from the National Risk Assessment Center (2013–2019) revealed 211 confirmed listeriosis cases across 64 sentinel hospitals in 11 provinces, with notable inter-provincial variation in reported case numbers. Between 2015 and 2020, Henan Province reported 71 listeriosis cases from 16 sentinel hospitals, including 38 perinatal infections (12). Research reports suggest that listeriosis in mainland China is underestimated, with perinatal cases likely being significantly higher than reported (13). Gansu Province incorporated listeriosis into its public health surveillance system in 2022. Since then, a pilot surveillance program has been implemented across five medical institutions in the province. In 2023, Qinyang People’s Hospital identified two pregnancy-associated cases, including one miscarriage and one preterm delivery. Wuwei Liangzhou Hospital reported one pregnancy-associated case involving a live birth at 27 weeks of gestation. The remaining three participating institutions did not report any pregnancy-related cases during the same period. No pregnancy-associated cases of listeriosis were detected in Gansu Province between 2024 and 2025. In certain cases, the reporting of listeriosis is contingent upon the diagnostic vigilance of clinicians. Among 207 surveyed tertiary hospital physicians in current study, only 14.98% had prior experience treating listeriosis, 26.57% were familiar with common LM-contaminated foods, 24.15% could recognize listeriosis symptoms, and 27.54% knew the appropriate treatment drugs. However, medical staff in Gansu Province demonstrated a relatively higher awareness of susceptible populations (46.86%) compared to Beijing’s foodborne disease surveillance personnel (38.78%) in 2016 (14). He et al. identified nonspecific clinical presentations, limited physician experience, and insufficient laboratory diagnostics as key factors contributing to underreporting and misdiagnosis of notifiable infectious diseases (15). Similarly, this study found that missed listeriosis diagnoses primarily resulted from lack of clinical suspicion and inadequate hospital testing capacity. Furthermore, most physicians had not received any listeriosis related training or continuing education in the past 2 years, which may contribute to underdiagnosis and underreporting of listeriosis cases in Gansu Province. Like many foodborne illnesses, Listeriosis often presents with nonspecific symptoms—vomiting, diarrhea, fever, abdominal pain—necessitating thorough clinical and epidemiological evaluation alongside laboratory confirmation (16). Overall, to effectively improve the efficiency of listeriosis surveillance in Gansu Province, it is essential to strengthen training for clinicians on listeriosis, enhance their diagnostic vigilance, and expand the current surveillance network to include more healthcare facilities. Furthermore, The standard treatment for listeriosis in humans involves β-lactams, particularly aminopenicillins like ampicillin or amoxicillin, typically combined with an aminoglycoside, most often gentamicin, to enhance the synergistic bactericidal effect (17), Notably, cephalosporins—frequently used as empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics—are ineffective against LM due to intrinsic resistance (8). Therefore, improving the vigilance of clinicians for listeriosis and ensuring adequate empirical antimicrobial coverage for LM is critically important for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes among affected pregnant women.

This survey revealed that 23.09% of the surveyed pregnant women were aware of or had heard about listeriosis, a rate higher than that reported in Beijing (18), yet significantly lower compared to findings from countries such as the Netherlands (19, 20). The willingness of pregnant women to acquire knowledge about listeriosis and to seek timely medical attention upon experiencing symptoms indicates a positive attitude, which facilitates the implementation of health education initiatives related to listeriosis among pregnant women. LM is capable of growth and reproduction at lower refrigeration temperatures (21), suggesting that refrigeration does not completely prevent food contamination. The results indicated that over 60% of pregnant women cleaned their refrigerators no more than twice per year, particularly among those with higher educational attainment, higher household income, and those who were not primigravid. Additionally, 17.83% of the surveyed pregnant women reported consuming leftover meals from the refrigerator without adequate reheating, predominantly among those with lower household income and primigravid women. Therefore, while promoting comprehensive listeriosis related health education for all pregnant women, targeted interventions should be emphasized for these specific subgroups. Efforts should focus on encouraging regular refrigerator cleaning and maintaining hygiene to prevent prolonged neglect, which may lead to LM proliferation and subsequent contamination of food, thereby posing potential risks to human health.

Machine-made ice cream, Chinese cold dishes, and ready-to-eat cooked meat products are recognized as high-risk food items for LM contamination (22). According to national surveillance data from 2021, the detection rate of LM in ready-to-eat cooked meat products across China was 2.49% (23). In Changchun City, between 2010 and 2023, the reported detection rate of LM in commercially available cold dishes reached 9.49% (24). This study found that more than half of the participants had consumed these high-risk foods within the past 4 weeks, with a higher proportion among those with higher educational attainment and first-time pregnant women. Given the relatively low incidence of listeriosis and its non-specific clinical presentation upon infection, public awareness of LM remains limited. Therefore, implementing targeted health education initiatives focusing on pregnant women is of critical importance.

Listeriosis is a preventable foodborne illness that can be mitigated through standard food safety practices, such as separating raw and cooked foods and ensuring thorough heating of food before consumption. In this survey, over half of the participating pregnant women did not maintain separate cutting boards for raw and cooked ingredients, and some failed to practice proper hand hygiene after handling raw meat during food preparation. Given that raw meat and processed meat products are recognized as high-risk vehicles for LM contamination, adherence to basic food safety principles is essential. A systematic review conducted by Zhang et al. revealed that the prevalence of LM in livestock and poultry meat in northern China was consistently higher than in southern regions (25). The positive detection rates of LM in ice cream and Chinese cold mixed dishes in Gansu Province from 2007 to 2011 were 8.33 and 3.14%, respectively (26). In 2022, the detection rate of LM in processed meat products—such as chicken and duck meat links, chicken fillets, and restructured beef steaks—was 9.16%, while raw poultry meat showed a detection rate of 12.11%, indicated raw meat and processed meat products may be susceptible to contamination by LM. Inadequate hygiene practices, such as improper separation of raw and cooked foods or failure to wash hands after handling raw meat, may lead to cross-contamination of cooked or ready-to-eat foods, thereby increasing the risk of human infection. Therefore, cultivating good food hygiene habits is critical for the prevention of listeriosis and other foodborne diseases. Moreover, the study found that a relatively small but notable proportion of pregnant women consume at least one daily meal from roadside stalls or mobile food vendors. While such food sources offer convenience and accessibility, they often lack adequate food safety controls. As a vulnerable population group, the nutritional and health status of pregnant women significantly influences both maternal and fetal well-being. Therefore, targeted interventions to guide pregnant women in making scientifically informed food choices and selecting appropriate dining venues are essential for preventing foodborne disease occurrence.

The Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) theory describes a sequential process in which individuals acquire knowledge, develop attitudes or beliefs, and ultimately form corresponding behaviors, with a positive interrelationship among these components. This study revealed a significant positive correlation between knowledge and attitude regarding listeriosis among pregnant women; however, no significant association was observed between attitude and behavior. These findings suggest that pregnant women in Gansu Province demonstrate coherence in acquiring listeriosis related knowledge and forming preventive beliefs. Although they tend to develop favorable attitudes toward listeriosis prevention after gaining relevant knowledge, this attitudinal shift does not appear to translate into consistent preventive actions. This discrepancy may stem from a mismatch between the knowledge acquired and the specific preventive measures required for listeriosis, or from an inadequate understanding of high-risk behaviors associated with the disease. Therefore, future health education initiatives on listeriosis should emphasize clear communication of actionable preventive strategies to enhance recipients’ comprehension and promote behavior change. Additionally, our survey found that older pregnant women with higher education levels, better family incomes, and those who are further along in their pregnancies—or experiencing their first pregnancy—tend to have better knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors when it comes to listeriosis. That means while we should keep providing health education to all pregnant women, we should especially focus on younger moms-to-be, those with less education, lower income, those in their early pregnancy, and those who have been pregnant before. Guiding the population to establish good hygiene habits and abandon high-risk behaviors of listeriosis is of great significance for avoiding adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Ongoing attention will be given to the surveillance and reporting of listeriosis cases in Gansu Province.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the participants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the investigation hospitals in Lanzhou City, Qingyang City, Wuwei City, and Dingxi City.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the Epidemiology Training Project of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Project No. 102393220020010000027), with a total grant of 32,000 Chinese yuan. The funder did not participate in the writing of this text. No commercial funding was involved.

Footnotes

Edited by: Linas Rovas, Klaipeda University Hospital, Lithuania

Reviewed by: Hidayet Metin Erdogan, Aksaray University, Türkiye

Tomislav Sukalić, Croatian Veterinary Institute, Croatia

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

W-XL: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Software, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Data curation, Visualization. K-LW: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Supervision, Investigation. X-LS: Resources, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Z-YS: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Investigation. X-CL: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1661344/full#supplementary-material

Table_1.pdf (124.2KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Orsi RH, Wiedmann M. Characteristics and distribution of Listeria spp., including Listeria species newly described since 2009. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2016) 100:5273–87. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7552-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yang M, Bai RY, Tai JG, Guo PJ, Dong K. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of 32 patients with Listeria monocytogenes bacteremia. Chin J Zoonoses. (2024) 40:652–5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2024.00.104 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khsim IEF, Ma A, Horte IB. Listeriosis in pregnancy: anumbrella review of maternal exposure, treatment and neonatal complications. BJOG. (2022) 129:1427–33. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pouillot R, Hoelzer K, Jackson KA, Henao OL, Silk BJ. Relative risk of listeriosis in foodborne diseases active surveillance network (FoodNet) sites according to age, pregnancy, and ethnicity. Clin infect dis. (2012) 54:405–10. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Desai RW, Smith MA. Pregnancy-related listeriosis. Birth Defects Res. (2017) 109:324–35. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1012, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang ZF, Liu XJ, Chen WW. Characteristics of listeriosis cases reported in literatures in China, 2010-2023. Chin J Zoonoses. (2024) 40:652–5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2024.00.095 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cheng Y, Dong QL, Liu YT, Liu H, Zhang HZ, Wang X, et al. Systematic review of Listeria monocytogenes from food and clinical samples in Chinese mainland from 2010 to 2019. Trop Med Int Health. (2022) 27:1037–46. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13828 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen ZM, Xu LH, Lei X, Liu H, Zhang H, Wang X. Clinical feature and laboratory findings of 14 cases of listeriosis during pregancy. Chin J Clin Infect Dis. (2022) 15:132–6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2022.02.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang P, Chen YQ. A clinical analysis of 16 patients with maternal listeriosis. Chin J Intern Med. (2015) 54:763–7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2015.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu RR, Fu SF. Maternal and infant outcomes of Listeria infection during pregnancy: a case report. Chin Med Case Rep. (2024) 6:E2820. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cmcr20240312-00396 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang YH, Chen RH. One case of listeria infection during pregnancy. Chin Med Case Rep. (2024) 6:E2820. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cmcr20241202-02677 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chui HX, Qi HY, Qiu Z Y, Li WW, Jia SH, Wang GY, et al. Analysis on epidemiological characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes in patients from Henan province between 2015 to 2020. Chin J Lab Med (2021)44:749–754. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20201012-00768 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang LF, Jing X, Wang H. Listeriosis in mainland China: a systematic review. Int J Infect Dis. (2019) 81:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.01.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ma XC, Ma R, Zeng B, Xue YF, Wu YB, Wang C, et al. Investigation on the current status of knowledge, attitude and behavior of foodborne diseases among medical staff in sentinel hospitals in Beijing. Chin J Prev Med. (2016) 17:69–71. doi: 10.16506/j.1009-6639.2016.01.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.He R, Chi XW, Wang HT, Wang XW, Kong WJ, Hong BL, et al. Investigation on the current situation of diagnosis and treatment of statutory infectious diseases and the demand for symptom monitoring and early warning system. Chin J Nosocomiol. (2024) 34:3817–22. doi: 10.11816/cn.ni.2024-240123 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang SH, Yang HZ, Hou XM, Li MY, Mao ZQ, Wang SS, et al. Clinical analysis of 12 cases of Listeria monocytogenes infection during pregnancy. J Pract Obstet Gynecol. (2022) 38:794–8. doi: 10.13390/j.issn.1003-6946.2022.10.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schlech WF. Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of Listeria monocytogenes infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2019) 7:12. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0014-2018, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang TY, Ma XC, Niu YL, Wang C, Wu YB, Jiang JR, et al. Investigation on knowledge, attitude and practice related to listeriosis among pregnant woman in Beijing. Chin J Health Educ. (2022) 38:222–7. doi: 10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2022.03.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Monique TP, Judith M, Evelien RSP, Schellevis FG, Hutton EK. Observational study to assess pregnant women's knowledge and behaviour to prevent toxoplasmosis, listeriosis and cytomegalovirus. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2013) 13:1–12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Greye H, Henning S, Freese K, Köhn A, Lux A, Radusch A, et al. Cross-sectional study to assess awareness of cytomegalovirus infection among pregnant women in Germany. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2022) 22:964. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05312-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.FAO/WHO . Risk assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods:Interpretative summary. (2015). Available online at: http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/agns/jemra-riskassessment-listeria-en-asp
  • 22.Niu YL, Li WW, Xu BY, Chen W, Qi X, Zhou Y, et al. Risk factors associated with food consumption and food-handling habits for sporadic listeriosis: a case-control study in China from 2013 to 2022. Emerg Microbes Infect. (2024) 13:2348526. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2348526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang SR, Peng ZX, Yang DJ. Prevalence of microbial contamination in commercially available ready-to-eat meat products-China, 2021. J Hyg Res. (2024) 53:831–3. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.Weishengyanjiu [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gong YW, Li YT. Analysis of Listeria monocytogenes detection in food products sold in Changchun City from 2010 to 2023. Chin J Public Health Eng. (2024) 23:473–7. doi: 10.19937/j.issn.1671-4199.2024.04.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang HQ, Dong PC, Zhu LX, Liu YG, Mao YW, Luo X, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in livestock and poultry in China. Chin J Food Hyg. (2023) 35:1120–8. doi: 10.13590/j.cjfh.2023.07.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hu XN, Su CY, Quan YL. Detection and analysis of L. monocytogenes from instant food in Gansu Province from 2007 to 2011. Bull Dis Control Prev. (2013) 28:50–2. doi: 10.13215/j.cnki.jbyfkztb.2013.03.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table_1.pdf (124.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Public Health are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES