Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1978 Mar;276:299–310. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012234

Effects of picrotoxin and strychnine on rabbit retinal ganglion cells: changes in centre surround receptive fields.

J H Caldwell, N W Daw
PMCID: PMC1282425  PMID: 650452

Abstract

1. The effects of picrotoxin and strychnine on the centre surround types of ganglion cell (X, Y, sluggish sustained and sluggish transient with on or off centres, and colour coded) were studied in the rabbit retina. 2. Picrotoxin changed the centre surround balance in favour of the centre for Y cells and sluggish transient cells but not for X cells or sluggish sustained cells. 3. Inhibition by a moving radial grating was abolished by picrotoxin for off centre Y cells, but not for on centre Y cells. 4. Picrotoxin abolished the surround response for six on centre sustained cells. These were hybrid cells with conduction velocities and receptive field properties characteristic of more than one of the X, Y and sluggish categories. The surround was not abolished by picrotoxin for any of the cells which fell in the standard X, Y and sluggish categories. 5. Strychnine did not affect the centre surround balance substantially in any of the cells tested. Strychnine did effect the transients: in general strychnine shortened or abolished them, while picrotoxin made them larger.

Full text

PDF
299

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ames A., 3rd, Pollen D. A. Neurotransmission in central nervous tissue: a study of isolated rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol. 1969 May;32(3):424–442. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.3.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caldwell J. H., Daw N. W. New properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:257–276. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caldwell J. H., Daw N. W., Wyatt H. J. Effects of picrotoxin and strychnine on rabbit retinal ganglion cells: lateral interactions for cells with more complex receptive fields. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:277–298. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chan R. Y., Naka K. The amacrine cell. Vision Res. 1976;16(10):1119–1129. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(76)90252-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cleland B. G., Levick W. R., Sanderson K. J. Properties of sustained and transient ganglion cells in the cat retina. J Physiol. 1973 Feb;228(3):649–680. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dowling J. E. Organization of vertebrate retinas. Invest Ophthalmol. 1970 Sep;9(9):655–680. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dowling J. E. Synaptic organization of the frog retina: an electron microscopic analysis comparing the retinas of frogs and primates. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1968 Jun 11;170(1019):205–228. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1968.0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaneko A. Physiological and morphological identification of horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in goldfish retina. J Physiol. 1970 May;207(3):623–633. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaneko A. Receptive field organization of bipolar and amacrine cells in the goldfish retina. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;235(1):133–153. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kirby A. W., Enroth-Cugell C. The involvement of gamma-aminobutyric acid in the organization of cat retinal ganglion cell receptive fields. A study with picrotoxin and bicuculline. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Oct;68(4):465–484. doi: 10.1085/jgp.68.4.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Matsumoto N., Naka K. I. Identification of intracellular responses in the frog retina. Brain Res. 1972 Jul 13;42(1):59–71. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90042-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller R. F., Dacheux R. F. Synaptic organization and ionic basis of on and off channels in mudpuppy retina. I. Intracellular analysis of chloride-sensitive electrogenic properties of receptors, horizontal cells, bipolar cells, and amacrine cells. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Jun;67(6):639–659. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.6.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Naka K., Marmarelis P. Z., Chan R. Y. Morphological and functional identifications of catfish retinal neurons. III. Functional identification. J Neurophysiol. 1975 Jan;38(1):92–131. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.1.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nelson R. A comparison of electrical properties of neurons in Necturus retina. J Neurophysiol. 1973 May;36(3):519–535. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.3.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Werblin F. S., Dowling J. E. Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. J Neurophysiol. 1969 May;32(3):339–355. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.3.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Werblin F. S. Lateral interactions at inner plexiform layer of vertebrate retina: antagonistic responses to change. Science. 1972 Mar 3;175(4025):1008–1010. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4025.1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES