Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1978 Mar;276:403–417. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012243

Effects of dithiothreitol on end-plate currents.

D A Terrar
PMCID: PMC1282434  PMID: 25960

Abstract

1. End-plate currents have been studied in frog cutaneus pectoris nerve-muscle preparations mounted in continuously flowing solution, using the voltage clamp technique. 2. Exposure of the muscle to 1 mM-dithiothreitol reduced the amplitude of end-plate currents by a factor of 2.7 (mean; range 1.6-3.4; twelve fibres). 3. 1 mM-dithiothreitol also caused a 2.7-fold (2.3-3.1) increase in the rate of decay, and a 1.4-fold (1.3-1.6) decrease in the time to peak of end-plate currents. During the onset of action of dithiothreitol, there was little or no indication of departure of end-plate current decay from a simple exponential. 4. Dithiothreitol actions on amplitude and decay of end-plate currents developed with similar time courses and both effects were slower in onset at pH 7.2 than at pH 8.5. 5. The actions of dithiothreitol were reversed by exposure of the muscle to 1 mM-5,5'-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid). 6. Following dithiothreitol treatment, the rates of decay of end-plate currents continued to depend on membrane potential; there was little or no change in the slope of the relation between in (rate of decay) and membrane potential, consistent with little or no change in the dipole moment of a gating molecule for ion channels. 7. Dithiothreitol changed the relation between peak end-plate current and membrane potential, so that peak conductance increased at more negative membrane potentials; this finding could be accounted for in terms of the closure of ion-channel gates becoming faster though remaining voltage-sensitive after exposure to dithiothreitol. 8. It is concluded that dithiothreitol causes changes in the kinetics of gating of ion channels associated with receptors and that these changes accompany changes in the binding of ACh to receptors.

Full text

PDF
403

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R. An analysis of the dose-response curve at voltage-clamped frog-endplates. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Oct 28;360(2):145–153. doi: 10.1007/BF00580537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams P. R. Voltage dependence of agonist responses at voltage-clamped frog endplates. Pflugers Arch. 1976 Jan 30;361(2):145–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00583458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albuquerque E. X., Sokoll M. D., Sonesson B., Thesleff S. Studies on the nature of the cholinergic receptor. Eur J Pharmacol. 1968 Aug;4(1):40–46. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(68)90007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ben-Haim D., Dreyer F., Peper K. Acetylcholine receptor: modification of synaptic gating mechanism after treatment with a disulfide bond reducing agent. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Mar 22;355(1):19–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00584796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ben-Haim D., Landau E. M., Silman I. The role of a reactive disulphide bond in the function of the acetylcholine receptor at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Oct;234(2):305–325. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Biesecker G. Molecular properties of the cholinergic receptor purified from Electrophorus electricus. Biochemistry. 1973 Oct 23;12(22):4403–4409. doi: 10.1021/bi00746a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown D. A., Kwiatkowski D. A note on the effect of dithiothreitol (DTT) on the depolarization of isolated sympathetic ganglia by carbachol and bromo-acetylcholine. Br J Pharmacol. 1976 Jan;56(1):128–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1976.tb06968.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. CLELAND W. W. DITHIOTHREITOL, A NEW PROTECTIVE REAGENT FOR SH GROUPS. Biochemistry. 1964 Apr;3:480–482. doi: 10.1021/bi00892a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Colquhoun D., Large W. A., Rang H. P. An analysis of the action of a false transmitter at the neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1977 Apr;266(2):361–395. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Connor J. A., Stevens C. F. Inward and delayed outward membrane currents in isolated neural somata under voltage clamp. J Physiol. 1971 Feb;213(1):1–19. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dionne V. E., Stevens C. F. Voltage dependence of agonist effectiveness at the frog neuromuscular junction: resolution of a paradox. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):245–270. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dreyer F., Peper K. Density and dose-response curve of acetylcholine receptors in frog neuromuscular junction. Nature. 1975 Feb 20;253(5493):641–643. doi: 10.1038/253641a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fleisch J. H., Krzan M. C., Titus E. Alterations in pharmacologic receptor activity by dithiothreitol. Am J Physiol. 1974 Dec;227(6):1243–1248. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1974.227.6.1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gage P. W., Eisenberg R. S. Action potentials without contraction in frog skeletal muscle fibers with disrupted transverse tubules. Science. 1967 Dec 29;158(3809):1702–1703. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3809.1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gage P. W. Generation of end-plate potentials. Physiol Rev. 1976 Jan;56(1):177–247. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1976.56.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartzell H. C., Kuffler S. W., Yoshikami D. Post-synaptic potentiation: interaction between quanta of acetylcholine at the skeletal neuromuscular synapse. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):427–463. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Howell J. N. A lesion of the transverse tubules of skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1969 May;201(3):515–533. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hucho F., Changeux J. P. Molecular weight and quaternary structure of the cholinergic receptor protein extracted by detergents from Electrophorus electricus electric tissue. FEBS Lett. 1973 Dec 15;38(1):11–15. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(73)80500-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jenkinson D. H., Terrar D. A. Influence of chloride ions on changes in membrane potential during prolonged application of carbachol to frog skeletal muscle. Br J Pharmacol. 1973 Feb;47(2):363–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1973.tb08334.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. A study of the desensitization produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 29;138(1):63–80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karlin A., Bartels E. Effects of blocking sulfhydryl groups and of reducing disulfide bonds on the acetylcholine-activated permeability system of the electroplax. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Nov 8;126(3):525–535. doi: 10.1016/0926-6585(66)90010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Karlin A., Winnik M. Reduction and specific alkylation of the receptor for acetylcholine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Jun;60(2):668–674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.60.2.668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Katz B., Miledi R. The binding of acetylcholine to receptors and its removal from the synaptic cleft. J Physiol. 1973 Jun;231(3):549–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Landau E. M., Ben-Haim D. Acetylcholine noise: analysis after chemical modification of receptor. Science. 1974 Sep 13;185(4155):944–946. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4155.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. A quantitative description of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):173–197. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Magleby K. L., Terrar D. A. Factors affecting the time course of decay of end-plate currents: a possible cooperative action of acetylcholine on receptors at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(2):467–495. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mallart A., Dreyer F., Peper K. Current-voltage relation and reversal potential at junctional and extrajunctional ACh-receptors of the frog neuromuscular junction. Pflugers Arch. 1976 Mar 11;362(1):43–47. doi: 10.1007/BF00588679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rang H. P. Drug receptors and their function. Nature. 1971 May 14;231(5298):91–96. doi: 10.1038/231091a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rang H. P., Ritter J. M. The effect of disulfide bond reduction on the properties of cholinergic receptors in chick muscle. Mol Pharmacol. 1971 Nov;7(6):620–631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Terrar D. A. The effect of dithiothreitol on the time course of end-plate currents in the presence of neostigmine [proceedings]. J Physiol. 1976 Dec;263(1):119P–120P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES